LSND/MiniBooNE Follow-up Experiment with DAEdALUS W.C. Louis Los Alamos National Laboratory August...

LSND/MiniBooNE Follow-up Experiment with DAEdALUS

W.C. Louis

Los Alamos National Laboratory

August 6, 2010

2

Outline

LSND & MiniBooNE e Oscillation Results

3+1 Fit to World Antineutrino Data Testing the LSND/MiniBooNE Signals with DAEdALUS Conclusions

3

LSND Signal

LSND experiment Stopped pion beam

+ e+ e

Excess of e in beam

e signature: Cherenkov light

from e+ with delayed from n-capture

Excess=87.9 ± 22.4 ± 6 (3.8)

4

LSND Signal

Assuming two neutrino oscillations

Can't reconcile LSND result with atmospheric and solar neutrino using only 3 Standard Model neutrinos – only two independent mass splitings

2mass

5

Sterile Neutrinos

3+N models

N>1 allows CP violation

e

≠ e

2mass

m34

2 ~ 0.1 – 100 eV2

m45

2 ~ 0.1 – 100 eV2

6

MiniBooNE Neutrino ResultPRL 102, 101802 (2009)

6.5e20 POT

No excess of events in signal region (E>475 MeV)

Ruled out simple 2 oscillations as LSND explanation (assuming no CP or CPT violation)

SIGNAL REGION

Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 231801 (2007)

7

MiniBooNE Neutrino ResultPRL 102, 101802 (2009)

• Excess of events observed at low energy:128.8 ± 20.4 ± 38.3 (3.0σ)

• Shape not consistent with simple 2 oscillations

• Magnitude consistent with LSND

• Anomaly Mediated Neutrino-Photon Interactions at Finite Baryon Density: Jeffrey A. Harvey, Christopher T. Hill, & Richard J. Hill, arXiv:0708.1281

• CP-Violation 3+2 Model: Maltoni & Schwetz, arXiv:0705.0107; T. Goldman, G. J. Stephenson Jr., B. H. J. McKellar, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 091301.

• Extra Dimensions 3+1 Model: Pas, Pakvasa, & Weiler, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 095017

• Lorentz Violation: Katori, Kostelecky, & Tayloe, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 105009

• CPT Violation 3+1 Model: Barger, Marfatia, & Whisnant, Phys. Lett. B576 (2003) 303

• New Gauge Boson with Sterile Neutrinos: Ann E. Nelson & Jonathan Walsh, arXiv:0711.1363

8

MiniBooNE Antineutrino Result

5.66e20 POT arXiv:1007.1150

9

MiniBooNE Antineutrino Null Probability

Absolute 2 probability of null point (background only) - model independent

Frequentist approach

475-1250 MeV chi2/NDF probability

e 6.1/6 40%

e 18.5/6 0.5%

10

MiniBooNE Oscillation Fit E>475

5.66E20 POT

E>475 is signal region for LSND type osc.

Oscillations favored over background only hypotheses at 99.4% CL (model dependent)

Best fit (sin22, m2) = (0.9584, 0.064 eV2) 2/ND = 16.4/12.6; Prob. = 20.5%2/ND = 8.0/4; Prob. = 8.7% (475-1250 MeV)

11

MiniBooNE

e oscillation results appear to confirm the LSND evidence for antineutrino oscillations, although more data are needed

E>475 MeV

LSND/MiniBooNE Data Compared to 3+N Global Fits (fits from Karagiorgi et al.)

3+1

3+2

G. Karagiorgi et al.,PRD80, 073001 (2009)

Best 3+1 Fit:m41

2 = 0.915 eV2

sin22e = 0.0043 = 87.9/103 DOFProb. = 86%

Predicts e

disappearance of sin22~ 35% andsin22ee ~ 4.3%

3+1 Global Fit to World Antineutrino Data(with old MiniBooNE data set)

3+N Models Requires Large Disappearance!

In general, P(e) < ¼ P(x) P(e x)

Reactor Experiments: P(e x) < 5%

LSND/MiniBooNE: P(e) ~ 0.25%

Therefore: P(x) > 20%

MiniBooNE Neutrino & Antineutrino Disappearance Limits

Improved results soon from MiniBooNE/SciBooNE Joint Analysis!

A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., PRL 103, 061802 (2009)

*

*

Global best fit

17

Future Experiments

MicroBooNE CD1 approved Address MB low energy excess Statistics too low for antineutrinos

Few ideas under consideration: Move or build a MiniBooNE like detector at 200m

(LOI arXiv:0910.2698) A new search for anomalous neutrino oscillations at the

CERN-PS (arxiv:0909.0355v3) Redoing a stopped pion source at ORNL (OscSNS -

http://physics.calumet.purdue.edu/~oscsns/) or DAEdALUS!

18

MiniDAEdALUS

Build MiniBooNE-like detector ~300’ (~90m) below cyclotron; (or use large WC detector filled with Gd!)

Copy MiniBooNE detector design except for higher PMT coverage (10%->20%) and addition of ~0.031 g/l of b-PBD; cost ~$10-15M

Poor cyclotron duty factor compensated by 300’ overburden (cosmic muon rate reduced by factor of ~100)

Assume ~ 1 year of data at ~1MW

Well understood neutrino fluxes and cross sections

Many advantages over LSND: (1) x5 larger detector; (2) x4 higher flux; (2) x100 lower cosmic-muon rate; (3) negligible DIF background; (4) run 12 months per year (instead of 3); (5) larger distance for m2<1 eV2 implies lower backgrounds;

MiniDAEdALUS

-> e (L/E) ~ 3% ;

e p -> e+ n (2.2 MeV )

-> e (L/E) < 1% ; Monoenergetic !; e

C -> e- Ngs (17.3 MeV e+)

-> s (L/E) < 1% ; Monoenergetic !; C -> C* (15.11 MeV )

-> s ; C -> C* (15.11 MeV )

MiniDaedalus would be capable of making precision measurements of

e appearance & disappearance and proving, for example, the

existence of sterile neutrinos! (see Phys. Rev. D72, 092001 (2005)).

For OscSNS& notMiniDAEdALUS

Search for Sterile Neutrinos with MiniDAEdALUS (or WC) Via Measurement of NC Reaction: C -> C*(15.11)

Garvey et al., Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 092001

21

MiniDAEdALUS

e appearance (left) and disappearance

sensitivity (right) for 1 year of running (for 60m!)

LSND Best Fit LSND Best Fit

22

Conclusions

• The MiniBooNE data are consistent with e oscillations at m2 ~ 1 eV2 and consistent with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from LSND.

• The MiniBooNE e oscillation allowed region appears to be different from the e oscillation allowed region.

• The world antineutrino data fit well to a 3+1 oscillation model with m2 ~ 1 eV2. All 3+N models predict large disappearance!

• A MiniBooNE-like detector (MiniDAEdALUS) located ~300’ below the DAEdALUS cyclotron could measure neutrino oscillations with high significance (>>5) and prove that sterile neutrinos exist!

Backup

24

E>200MeV 5.66E20 POT

Oscillations favored over background only hypotheses at 99.6% CL (model dependent)

No assumption made about low energy excess

Best fit (sin22, m2) = (0.0066, 4.42 eV2)2/NDF = 20.4/15.3; Prob.=17.1%

25

E>200MeV Subtract excess produced by neutrinos in mode

(11.6 events)

E<475MeV:

Large background

Not relevant for LSND type osc.

Big systematics

Null 2=32.8; p=1.7%

Best fit (sin22, m2) = (0.0061, 4.42 eV2)2/NDF = 21.6/15.3; Prob.=13.7%

26

Future sensitivity

MiniBooNE approved for a total of 1e21 POT

Potential exclusion of null point assuming best fit signal

E>475MeV fit

Protons on Target

27

BooNE

MiniBooNE like detector at 200m

Flux, cross section and optical model errors cancel in 200m/500m ratio analysis

Present neutrino low energy excess is 6 sigma statistical; 3 sigma when include systematics

Study L/E dependence Gain statistics quickly,

already have far detector data

Near/Far 4 sensitivity similar to single detector90% CL

6.5e20 Far + 1e20 Near POT

Sensitivity(Neutrino mode)

28

BooNE Better sensitivity to disappearance

Look for CPT violation ≠

6.5e20 Far/1e20 Near POT 1e21 Far/1e20 Near POT

29

Reminders of some analysis choices

Data bins chosen to be variable width to minimize N bins without sacrificing shape information

Technical limitation on N bins used in building syst error covariance matrices with limited statistics MC

First step in unblinding revealed a poor chi2 for oscillation fits extending below 475 MeV

Region below 475 MeV not important for LSND-like signal -> chose to cut it out and proceed

30

Reminders of some pre-unblinding choices

Why is the 300-475 MeV region unimportant?

Large backgrounds from mis-ids reduce S/B

Many systematics grow at lower energies

Most importantly, small S/B so not a good L/E region to look for LSND type oscillations

Energy in MB [MeV]1250 475 333

31

E>475 MeV

1 sigma contour includes 0.003<sin22<1

Initial MINOS Disappearance Results

Expect disappearance above10 GeV for LSND neutrino oscillations.

33

OscSNS Spallation neutron source at ORNL

1GeV protons on Hg target (1.4MW)

Free source of neutrinos

Well understood flux of neutrinos

Physics reach would be similar with DARDaedalus