OStream: Asynchronous Streaming Multicast in Application-Layer Overlay Networks Yi Cui, Baochun Li,...

oStream: Asynchronous Streaming Multicast in Application-Layer Overlay

Networks

Yi Cui, Baochun Li, and Klara Nahrstedt

IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 22 (1), Jan, 2004

Presented by Yuk

2

Outline

Introduction Temporal Dependency Model Algorithms Analysis: Scalability and Efficiency Performance Evaluation Conclusion and Comment Q & A

3

Introduction

Fundamental challenge of on-demand media distribution is unpredictability: Asynchrony Nonsequentiality Burstiness

Previous IP-Multicast-based solutions: Repeat the same media content on different channels over

time Clients are synchronized at the price of service delay

Proposed solution: Asynchronous Multicast

4

Introduction

5

Temporal Dependency Model

6

Hierarchical Stream Merging (HSM)

D. Eager, M. Vernon, and J. Zahorjan, “Minimizing bandwidth requirements for on-demand data delivery,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 13, pp. 742–757, Sept.–Oct. 2001.

7

Asynchronous Multicast (AM)

8

Qualitative Comparisons

Asynchronous group Purely end-host based Sequentialized sources

9

Problem Formulation

Given a MDG, the optimal solution for MDT, i.e., to minimize the overall transmission cost of media distribution, is to find the minimal spanning tree (MST) on MDG.

10

Algorithms – MDT-Delete

11

Algorithms – MDT-Insert

12

Some Theorems

Y. Cui, B. Li, and K. Nahrstedt, “oStream: Asynchronous streaming multicast in application-layer overlay networks,” Dept. Comput. Sci., Univ. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Tech. Rep. UIUCDCS-2002-2289/UILU-ENG-2002-1733, 2003.

13

Practical Issues

Content Discovery Service MDT algorithms require knowledge of all its predecessors

and successors Degree Constrained MDT

Constrain the outbound degree Modified MDT problem:

NP-complete!

14

Practical Issues (cont’d)– Simplified Session Switching

15

Scalability – Server Bandwidth Savings

16

Scalability (HSM)

17

Scalability (AM)

18

Scalability – Plots

19

Efficiency – Link Bandwidth Reduction

20

Efficiency – Plots

21

Performance Evaluation

A single CBR video distribution Video length, T = 1hr Simulation time = 12 hrs Topology:

k-ary tree Router-level (transit-stub) AS-level (power-law)

22

Server bandwidth consumption

23

Link cost

24

25

26

Operation Complexity

27

Conclusion

Concept of AM Take advantage of the strong buffering capabilities of

end hosts Scalability

Required server bandwidth < the theoretical lower bound of traditional IP-multicast

Efficiency The benefit overshadows the topological inefficiency

w.r.t link cost

28

Comment

Simple solution provide good results (simply buffering at end-hosts)

In-depth analysis and Extensive evaluation The main drawback:

Outbound > inbound, not realistic

Q & A

Thank you.