Parent data night

Parent Data Night

April 9th, 2012

Presented by: SPS District Data Team

District Data Team

• Deana Dugi, Federal Prog./Data Coordinator

• Evereta Thinn, PD/Assessment Coordinator

• Lance Lane, MS/HS Reading Coach• Leandra Scott, Elementary Reading

Coach• Nicole Devine, Elementary Math

Coach• Rory Hathale, HS Academic Coach

District Data Goals

• To use data to drive curriculum and instruction

• To improve student achievement using data

K – 12 Assessments

• Skills Based Assessments– Measures basic skills in subject

areas to meet standards• DIBLES• AIMSWeb

• Standards Based Assessments-Measures standards• NWEA• AIMS• Galileo

• Norm-Reference Test– Access to true national

comparisons, presented in National Percentile Ranks and other easy‐to‐compare measures• Stanford 10

Elementary/Middle School Data• NWEA

– computerized adaptive formative assessments that allow teachers to see their students as individuals – each with their own base of knowledge.

• DIBELS– measures the 5 Big Ideas in early literacy

• Phonemic Awareness• Alphabetic Principle• Accuracy and Fluency• Vocabulary• Comprehension

• AIMSWeb– AIMSWeb is a benchmark and progress monitoring

system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.

Data allows teachers to find out where they need to target their instruction. – Lance Lane

Math NWEA Data 2011-20122nd-8th Grades

46%

35%

17%

1% Fall

Falls Far Be-low

Approaches

Meets

Exceeds

38%

45%

17%

1%Winter

Falls Far Below

Approaches

Meets

Exceeds

Math AIMSweb Data 2011-20121st-8th Grades

22%

28%

50%

Fall

Intensive

Stretegic

Benchmark

13%

26%56%

Winter

Intensive

Strategic

Benchmark

Math Findings

• Fully implement Tier II and III

•Add math intervention program

• Focus on numbers and operations

•Continue to analyze data with teachers

DIBELS/AIMSWeb Data

2006/2007 Present

Benchmark 32 62

Strategic 28 22

Intensive 40 16

10%

30%

50%

70%

90%

*Improvement of Basic Indicators of Literacy at Shonto Preparatory

School Pre-K - Grade 8

Perc

enta

ge o

f Stu

dent

s: G

rade

s Pr

e-K

- 8

High School Data• Galileo Assessment

– a fully integrated, standards‑based instructional improvement system, providing comprehensive assessment and instructional tools.

• Galileo Benchmark-Quarterly Assessment-Reading(9-12) 9-12 Grade

Standards-Writing(9-10) 10 Grade

Standards-Math(Algebra I, Algebra

II, Geometry) -Standards and AIMS Test

Blueprints-Individual and District

Summary

Reading Benchmarks

Bench-mark 1

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds Bench-mark 2

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds Bench-mark 3

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds

Reading 9th

1386 1272 1412 1502 1300 1277 1417 1507 1280 1280 1420 1510

Reading 10th

1330 1259 1324 1485 1377 1268 1333 1494 1386 1274 1339 1500

Reading 11th

1497 1423 1506 1656 1504 1426 1509 1659 1526 1428 1511 1661

Reading 12th

1540 1448 1568 1682 1589 1451 1571 1685 1603 1453 1573 1687

100

300

500

700

900

1100

1300

1500

1700

Quarterly Galileo Reading Benchmarks

Stud

ent

Perc

enti

le

Writing Benchmarks

Bench-mark 1

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds Bench-mark 2

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds Bench-mark 3

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds

Writing 9th 1331 1272 1403 1525 1361 1329 1393 1528 1361 1303 1371 1495

Writing 10th

1385 1355 1398 1457 1493 1429 1513 1617 1444 1372 1458 1583

100

300

500

700

900

1100

1300

1500

1700

Quarterly Galileo Writ-ing Assessments

Stud

ent P

erce

ntile

Math Benchmarks

Bench-mark 1

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds Bench-mark 2

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds Bench-mark 3

Ap-proaches

Meets Exceeds

Algebra I 1421 1418 1447 1504 1390 1426 1455 1512 1384 1432 1461 1518

Algebra II 1295 1279 1353 1424 1360 1287 1361 1432 1362 1293 1367 1438

Geometry 1404 1394 1412 1489 1408 1414 1432 1509 1396 1427 1445 1522

1175

1225

1275

1325

1375

1425

1475

1525

Quarterly Galileo Mathematics Assessments

Stud

ent P

erce

ntile

Galileo Findings

• Another Assessment (NWEA, AR, A+)• Quarterly Teacher Made Assessments• Data Driven Instruction• Consistent Monitoring• Implementation of Common Core

AIMSWeb - Defining Accuracy

• Independent level (99%-100% accuracy)• Instructional level (90%-98%

accuracy)• Frustration level (<90% accuracy)

9th Grade Accuracy

36%

64%

9th Grade

IndependentInstructionalFrustration

10th Grade Accuracy

43%

49%

9%

10th Grade

IndependentInstructionalFrustration

11th Grade Accuracy

17%

52%

31%

11th Grade

IndependentInstructionalFrustration

12th Grade Accuracy

33%

61%

6%

12th Grade

IndependentInstructionalFrustration

AIMSWeb Findings• Very Low Fluency Rates for a majority of our

students.• Lots of Opportunities!!!–Majority of our students are at Instructional

level.–Focus on:•Direct Instruction of Content Area Vocabulary.•More opportunities for students reading aloud in class.• Strategies to help build fluency and comprehension.

State Assessments

• AIMS – measures student proficiency of the Arizona

Academic Content Standards in Writing, Reading, Mathematics, and Science

• Stanford 10 – Used to make comparisons between

individual student performance and the results of a reference group

• AZELLA (Arizona English Language Learner Assessment)– An assessment to ensure English Language

Learners meet the expectations necessary for inclusion

Data Team Conclusions• Longitudinal data at K-8 is vital information

• More data is needed at the High School

• For data to be used effectively, all stakeholders need to provide support

• Data is key to improve student learning

Ah4hee’