View
295
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Institut français
des sciences et technologies
des transports, de l’aménagement
et des réseaux
Transportation system complexity
: Optimal driving strategies
Olivier OrfilaTongJi University (High End Foreign Expert)IFSTTAR-COSYS-LIVIC (Senior Researcher)olivier.orfila@ifsttar.fr
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
What are our objectives?
• We want to mitigate a wide range of transportation issues (congestion, pollution, safety, etc)
• In our case: Reduce the negative impact of road transport on health and environnement:
• Reduce greenhouse gases emissions (GHG);
• Reduce pollutants emissions;
• Reduce energy use;
• All of this without increasing travel time nor road insecurity.
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Regulation is pressing!
• Emissions
standards:
• Increasing
constraints
• COP21 :
• Limit global
warming to 2°C
targetting 1.5°CHistorical fleet CO2 emissions performance and current or proposed passenger vehicle standards (ICCT, International Council on Clean Transportation):
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
What about passenger cars?
• Fuel use data in the US (IEA)
• In France, 55% of GHG
emissions are due to light duty
vehicles (source : MEEM,
french ministry of ecology)
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Role of infrastructure,
vehicles and drivers
Drivers :•Driving•Use choice, maintenance, client choices
Vehicle :•Mass, aérodynamics•Engine•ADAS•Tires,…
Infrastructure :•Geometry•Road texture•Urban planning•ITS
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
USE CASE OF OPTIMAL
DRIVING: ECODRIVING
First part
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
A few energy reach the
wheel and we are still
spoiling it!
Ecodriving =
cooking leftovers
Ecodriving definition proposal
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Ecodriving history
Toyota, Glass of water
BMW, econometer
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Ecodriving definition
« Ecodriving is a strategy to reduce fuel use by following several
advice: do not accelerate strongly, reduce speed, keeping low
RPMs, anticipate traffic. » M. Barth, K. Boriboonsomsin, 2009. Energy and
emissions impacts of a freeway-based dynamic eco-driving system
« Ecodriving should not be confused with hypermiling wich
neglects safety to reduce fuel use while ecodriving has no trade-
off » J. N. Barkenbus, 2010. Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative
« Ecodriving aims at following a vehicle safely in order to reduce
energy use on the long term » M.A.S. Kamal, M. Mukai, J. Murata and T.
Kawabe, 2010. On board eco-driving system for varying road-traffic environments
using model predictive control
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Ecodriving definition proposal• Ecodriving is a set of driving technics, dealing with all driving tasks,
aiming at minimizing the energy losses and/or emissions rate of thedriven vehicle, from an origin to a destination, without trading-offsafety nor total travel time.
• Note: Ecodriving is a real time multi objective optimization process.
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Is ecodriving efficient?
Wengraf I.: Easy on The Gas, The effeciteveness of ecodriving, RAC Foundation, London, 2012, pp.16-17
Experimental : 20 weeks before and after ecodriving training (golden rules)
Isuzu Motors: Fuel economy challenge: One trip before and one after
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Some ecodriving research
questions• Can ecodriving famous golden rules, taken
one by one:• Reduce the energy used by the concerned
vehicle?
• Reduce the emissions rates of the concernedvehicle?
• Improve road safety for the concerned vehicle?
• Reduce congestions?
• Increase comfort?
• Reduce traffic noise?
• And what about a whole network?
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
IFSTTAR ecodriving research
methodology• Ecodriving optimization• Ecodriving modelling
• Ecodriving assistance
systems
• Impact of ecodriving
Smart and Green ACC
ddriver
Tdriver
V
d
Vi
g
SAGA Mode
Target Speed
Target Acc.
Error Flag
Accuracy
Dyn. Limit
Func. Limit
70
Vdriver
eHorizon
Fuel use in congested urbantraffic
Fuel use in nearly congestedinterurban roads
δ
ωmax2
Olivier Orfila, Guillaume Saint Pierre, Cindie Andrieu. (2012) « Gear Shifting BehaviorModel for Ecodriving Simulations Based on Experimental Data », EWGT2012
H. T. Luu, 2011, Développement de méthodes de réduction de la consommation en carburant d’un véhicule dans un contexte de sécurité et de confort : un compromis entre économie et écologie. Thèse de doctorat, Université d’Evry
Orfila O., Saint Pierre G., Messias M. (2014), « Development of an ecodriving assistance application for nomadic devices performing real-time and post trip coaching for road vehicles », TRA 2014, Paris, La Défense.
O. Orfila, 2011, Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriver on traffic and fuel consumption, YR2011, Copenhaguen
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Methodology: an ecodriving
modelling
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Ecodrivingparameters
Ecodrivenvehicles
Normallydriven
vehicles
Trafficdemand
Road network
Traffic micro simulation
Fuel consumption
Traffic indicator(mean speed)
%
•IDM (Intelligent Driver Model) Treiber, 2000
•Gipps model 1981 (AIMSUN)
•Interurban•Urban
•Free traffic state
•Intermediate trafficstate
•Congested trafficstate
2 types of roads x 3 traffic states x 11 proportions of ecodrivers x 10 replications = 660 numerical tries
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Traffic micro simulation on urban
roads
• Gipps model (Gipps, 1981) with Aimsun (TSS)
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
0%
50%
100%
Free
Intermediate
Congested
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
RESULTS:
Interurban roads
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Results : interurban road – free
traffic• Fuel consumption
• Slight and steady decrease
• Fuel consumption reduces
by 7.7%
• Traffic indicator
• Slight decrease (9.1%)
• 2 minutes lost on a 20
minutes travel
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Optimal proportion of ecodrivers : 100%
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Results : interurban road –
intermediate traffic• Fuel consumption
• Non linear variation
• From 0 to 20% of ecodrivers
: -8.5%
• From 0 to 100% : +2.4 %
• Traffic indicator
• Sharp decrease : -38%
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Optimal proportion of ecodrivers : 20%
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Results : interurban road –
congested traffic• Fuel consumption :
• Strong reduction : -35.8%
• Traffic indicator
• Sharp decrease : -55%
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Optimal proportion of ecodrivers : 30%
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
RESULTS:
Urban roads
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Results : urban road – free traffic
• Fuel consumption
• Slow decrease : -9.8 %
• Traffic indicator
• Strong decrease : -19.7%
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Optimal proportion of ecodrivers : not defined
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Results : urban road –
intermediate traffic• Fuel consumption
• Non linear variations : -7.6%
• Traffic indicator
• Non linear variations : -
32.3%
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Optimal proportion of ecodrivers : not defined but 80% should be avoided
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Results : urban road – congested
traffic• Fuel consumption
• Strong effect: -19.6%
• Traffic indicator
• Nearly steady
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Optimal proportion of ecodrivers : 100%
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Conclusions
• Ecodriving is efficient at a global point of
view for energy use only.
• The optimal proportion of ecodrivers varies
with the situation.
• In some situations, the fuel
consumption increases with the
proportion of ecodrivers
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Proposed solutions for
ecodriving
• Short term: promote ecodriving on
identified situations
• Middle term: giving real time advice to the
driver
• Long term: develop a strategy to manage
a whole network.
• Change subsystem definition
Impact of the penetration rate of ecodriving on fuel consumption and traffic
congestion
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
STUDYING TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM COMPLEXITY
Second part
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Transportation system and life cycle
Automotive
industry
energy
production
infrastructure
construction
multimodality
recycling
depolluting
maintenance
highways –
periurban
roads
urban
networks
rural
networks
Usage
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Decomposing the transportation
system
• Structural analysis:
• Physical structures
• Administrative structures
• Studying interaction between elements
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Road transportation system
Physical
• Infrastructure:
• Road, power supplies,
power stations, public
transport stations, ITS,…
• Vehicles:
• Private cars, shared cars,
trucks, buses, bikes,
motorbikes,…
• Users:
• drivers, pilots,…
Administrative
• Government
• Local collectivities: • Province, City, District,
• Private companies:• vehicle sharing, vehicle renting,
infrastructure managers
• Associations:• User association, road
association, vehicle manufacturers association
• Laboratories:• Resaerch centers, universities
We should think about
interactions and scales!
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
HOW TO DEFINE A
SUBSYSTEM LIMITS
Third part
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Defining the subsystem limits
• Selecting a subsystem is a complex task
that generally consists in finding the good
study scale (select the right numbers of
actors, select the right study area such as
a street, a quarter, a city, a province or a
country).
• A wrong selection leads to suboptimal
solutions or cons-productive results.
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Isolated system, closed system,
opened system?
• Isolated system: that is totally separated from other systems and that does not interact with others.
• Closed system: system exchanging energy with other systems
• Opened system: system exchanging energy and matter with other systems
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Co-evolution
• Host, parasitic co-evolution: metaphoric,
Road (host) and car (parasitic)
• Combined co-evolution:
• Antagonistic : Taxis and private cars service,
buses and trains.
• Symbiosis : commercial centers and cars,
thermal engine and fuel.
• Diffuse co-evolution: ITS, as related to
several transportation means.
Institut français des sciences et technologies des transports, de l’aménagement et des réseaux
www.ifsttar.fr
Conclusion
• When trying to mitigate very important issues we might first have to:
• have a good overall vision of the global tranportation system and subsystems and their interactions
• define the subsystem in accordance with transportation system decomposition and by interacting with transportation actors.
• make research studies to proove the concept efficiency
Recommended