Upload
kerry-white
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
指導老師 : 李惠敏 老師報告學生 : 劉家宏103.09.04
2
Background
There is little evidence for the optimal form of non-operative treatment in the management of frozen shoulder.
3
Background
The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy has completed a project on the management of frozen shoulder conclusions drawn from these evidence-based clinical guidelines
Detail to remove ambiguity, consider multicenter trials, and focus on specific stages of frozen shoulder
4
Frozen shoulder
Uncertain etiology characterized by the spontaneous onset of pain with significant restriction of both active and passive range of movement of the shoulder.
5
Frozen shoulder
A primary of ‘‘true’’ frozen shoulder occurs when there is no exogenous cause , preexisting condition, no systemic diagnosis or radiographic explanation can be found
6
Frozen shoulder
Arthroscopic and histologic studies have shown that the condition is one of glenohumeral capsular contraction, particularly of the coracohumeral ligament within the rotator interval.
7
8
Frozen shoulder
Phases of Frozen shoulder Freezing Frozen Thawing
The importance of recognizing that the disease process is a continuum rather than having well-defined stages.
9
Methods
The study used a randomized controlled trial of 3 common physiotherapy interventions.
Eligible patients were all new referrals to the physiotherapy department with a diagnosis of frozen shoulder.
10
Methods
Inclusion criteria: 40-70 years Insidious onset pain Stiffness with loss of ROM, ER >50% With out underlying radiologic abnormality Symptoms over 3 months
11
Methods
Exclusion criteria Inappropriate of idiopathic frozen shoulder Pathologic findings on radiographic evaluation Trauma Local corticosteroid injection Inflammatory Bilateral frozen shoulder Surgery Fractures Dislocation
12
13
Methods
Range of motion was measured in a standardized manner with a universal goniometer
Most patients were unable to reach 90 of abduction; therefore, external rotation was measured at the maximum pain-free angle of abduction.
A single independent physiotherapist, made all assessments.
14
Outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was the Constant-Murley score Activities of daily living Range of motion Pain Strength
The score combines subjective and objective measures to produce a 100-point score
15
Outcome measures
The secondary outcome measures were the Oxford Shoulder Score, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Disability Scale (HADS)
Oxford Shoulder Score: subjective questionnaire that contains 12 questions Pain Function
16
Outcome measures
Short Form 36: self-administered Physical functioning (10 items) Role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), Bodily pain(2 items) Social functioning (2 items) Mental health (5 items) Role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), General health perceptions (5 items)
Hospital Anxiety and Disability Scale 7 depressive items and 7 anxiety-related items
17
Intervention groups
Randomly allocated to 1 of the 3 treatment groupsGroup 1: exercise class plus home exercisesGroup 2: individual multimodal
physiotherapy plus home exercisesGroup 3: home exercises alone
18
Intervention groups
Group 1: exercise class plus home exercises (4min/station,12stations/time, 2times/week) Home exercise program
19
DATE:
1Pulleys
Forwards 2’
Backwards 2’
2Flexion / Horizontal Add
Over Head 2”
Across Body 2”
3Ball Rolling
(time)Forwards 2’Sideways 2’
4Medial Rot/Extension
Towel + RopeStick behind back
5 Lateral Rotation
Lying with stick
1 30o
2 60o
3 90o
6Abduction
Stretch
4 Stick
2 Doorway
7ScapulaSetting
1 0o
2 60o
8 Trunk rotation1 Chair2 Ball
9
Trunk side flx rot
Ball Rolling side to side
10
Proprioception/Bal
Circular ball rolling
20
Intervention groups
Group 2:individual multimodal physiotherapy plus home exercises (2 times/weak)
The treatment program was based on local practice and expert opinion: Maitland mobilizations Soft tissue massage Myofascial trigger point release Heat Stretches
Home exercise program
21
Intervention groups
Group 3: home exercises alone The information booklet included the home
exercises; a description of frozen shoulder; and advice on sleep, posture, and pain relief.
22
Statistical analyses
Repeated-measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the outcome data was conducted
A power calculation was performed estimating the MCID of 15 points for the Constant score to achieve 80% power and 5% significance.
Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS 18.0
23
Results
850 p’t
75 p’t
Exercise class
(n=25)
Individual multimodal
physiotherapy (n=24)
Home exercise (n=26)
70 p’t declined to participate
705 p’t
didn’t fit inclusion criteria
24
Results
Mean Range
Age 51.1 years 40-65 years
Female to male ratio 1:1.14
Duration of symptom 5.78 months 4-10 months
Constant score 39.8 16-64
Oxford score 34.4 20-48
Forward elevation 95∘ 85 -120∘ ∘
External rotation 16∘ 10 -25∘ ∘
25
Results
In both Constant and Oxford scores for all groups between the different time intervals (P < .001).
26
Results
Exercise class greater than with individual physiotherapy or home exercises alone (P <.001)
27
Results
Both physiotherapy groups over home exercises (P <.001)
baseline 6 weeks 6 months 1 years
28
Individual Home exercise
Exercise class
P < .001 P < .001
Individual P =.002
P<.001 P<.001
P<.001
29
Individual Home exercise
Exercise class
P = .037 P < .001
Individual P < .001
P<.001
P<.001
P<.001
30
Results
HADS scores : compared with any of the post-treatment time periods (P < .001)
Exercise class and individual multimodal without significant difference
31
Results
HADS anxiety score over the home exercise group Exercise class: P < .001 Individual multimodal physiotherapy : P =.024
32
Results
SF-36 ( self-administered) Bodily pain (P = .011) Mental health (P = .009) Social function (P < .001)
33
Results
850 p’t
75 p’t
Exercise class(n=2
5)1 p’t died (n=24)
Individual multimodal physiotherapy (n=24)
1p’t local injection (n=23)
Home exercise (n=26)
2 p’t with withdrew at 6 months(n=24)
70 p’t declined to participate705 p’t
didn’t fit inclusion criteria
34
Discussion
The findings of this study support and provide substantial evidence for use of physiotherapy
An effective treatment intervention should result in a significant change in results during the first 6 weeks.
35
Discussion
With an MCID for the Constant score of 15 as a reference, at first 6 weeks
Constant score 15 Exercise class :91% Individual multimodal physiotherapy: 68% Home exercise: 41%
36
Discussion
Exercise class group: 72 After arthroscopic capsular release: 75.5 This could standardize treatment outcomes and
have an impact on the need for surgical or more invasive interventions.
37
Discussion
This is the first study to our knowledge demonstrating that physiotherapy interventions may be particularly beneficial in improving this anxiety aspect of shoulder pain.
38
Discussion
Only 17% of initial referrals (145 of 850) met the inclusion criteria for primary idiopathic frozen shoulder
A large number of patients with rotator cuff or ‘‘impingement’’ symptoms without stiffness
39
Discussion
A further limitation of the study is the absence of a natural history control group
Home exercises group without direct physiotherapy management and may well represent a close approximation to the natural history.
40
Discussion
Both the Constant score and Oxford score have been validated for the assessment of shoulder conditions.
The SF-36 is lack of sensitivity in the assessment of shoulder disease
41
Discussion
An exercise class, aimed at a rapid recovery rate with a minimum number of interventions, in relieving the signs and symptoms of frozen shoulder
42
Conclusions
A group exercise class provides superior outcomes in relieving the signs and symptoms of frozen shoulder.
However, standard multimodal physiotherapy remains a good alternative and has been demonstrated to be significantly better than unsupervised exercise at home.
43
The end
44
45
46
47