השוואת תגובות לטראומה מכלי שני: נשות שבויים ומטפלות בנפגעות תקיפה מינית

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

מאמר מתוך כתב העת "חברה ורווחה"מחברים: משה בן סימון¹, ארז נער² וזהבה סולומון²¹ ד"ר משה בן סימון, המחלקה לקרימינולוגיה, אוניברסיטת בר-אילן, רמת גן. טלפון: 02-6727860 דוא"ל: [email protected]² ארז נער, מוסמך אוניברסיטה לעבודה סוציאלית, בית-ספר לעבודה סוציאלית ע"ש בוב שאפל, אוניברסיטת תל-אביב, תל-אביב. טלפון: 0545-875053, דוא"ל: [email protected] ²פרופסור זהבה סולומון, מרכז המצוינות לחקר טראומה המונית, בית-ספר לעבודה סוציאלית ע"ש בוב שאפל, אוניברסיטת תל-אביב, תל-אביב. טלפון: 03-6409507 דוא"ל: [email protected]

Citation preview

  • :

    , :

    2727077-02: , .-" , ,

    li.ca.uib@mmisneb":

    , " - , ,

    [email protected] :, "852572-5052. : -, -

    " - , ,

    li.ca.uat.tsop@nomolos": 7259207-82. : -, -,

    nomoloS avahaZ dna ,raaN zerE ,nomisneB ehsoM

    .learsI ,naG tamaR ,ytisrevinU nalI-raB ,ygolonimirC fo tnemtrapeD ,DhP nomisneB ehsoM

    vivA-leT ,kroW laicoS fo loohcS lleppahS boB ehT ,)WSM( kroW laicoS fo retsaM ,raaN zerE

    .learsI ,ytisrevinU

    laicoS fo loohcS lleppahS boB ehT ,amuart ssam rof EROC-I ,rotceriD ,DhP nomoloS avahaZ

    .learsI ,ytisrevinU vivA-leT ,kroW

  • 2

    :

    . , ) (

    .

    : ,

    .,

    .

    .

    , (

    ). ( )

    .

    .

    ; ; ; -; :

    ;

  • 3

    Comparison of secondary traumatization reactions: Wives of prisoners

    of war and therapists of sexual assault victims

    Abstract

    To date, research on secondary traumatization has dealt mainly with two populations:

    family members of trauma survivors (e.g., children of Holocaust survivors, veterans

    wives) and mental health professionals, particularly those that work with victims of sexual

    abuse. Studies have generally investigated these two populations separately. The current

    study compared emotional distress symptoms, world view and empathy among four

    groups: two research groups wives of Israeli prisoners of war (POWs) of the 1973 Yom

    Kippur War and Israeli therapists of sexual assault victims, and two comparison groups

    wives of combat veterans and therapists of elderly people, respectively. The results show

    that as a consequence of secondary exposure to trauma, wives of POWs were found to

    suffer from higher emotional distress symptoms in comparison to therapists of sexual

    assault victims. Differences were found between the groups with regard to two sub-scales

    of world assumptions controllability and randomness but not with regard to the other

    sub-scales. The results reveal complex relationships between the independent variables

    (background, belonging to one of the research groups and empathic capacity) and the

    dependent variables (emotional distress symptoms and world assumptions). Moreover, it

    was found that high level of empathy was correlated with emotional distress symptoms in

    both research groups. Theoretical and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.

    Key words: secondary traumatization; posttraumatic stress disorder; prisoners of war;

    sexual assault victims; empathy; world assumptions

  • 4

    te nomoloS ;5002 ,.la te lekeD( ,

    ). 2991 ,.la

    : ,

    ,)5891 ,nahtaN & kcehnesoR ;3891 ,yelgiF) (noitazitamuarT yradnoceS(

    suoiraciV( ) 9991 ,yelgiF) (eugitaF noissapmoC(

    ). 0991 ,namlraeP & nnaCcM) (noitazitamuarT

    -

    ) , ( ), 1102 ,.la te wahsneR (

    ).3002 ,lleB( ,

    amuarT(

    , , ) srovivrus

    . -

    & kcehnesoR( ), 1002 ,rimA & leseiW-veL ;5891 ,ileinaD(

    ) 9002 ,hseroH & ,hcareZ ,lekeD ,nomoloS ,.g.e( )5891 ,nahtaN

    ). 7002 ,nomoloS & ,grubzniG ,namtnaH ,lekeD ,.g.e(

    -

    ) 6991 ,namllU( )amuart-edam-naM(

    . )8002 ,recnilukiM & ,lekeD ,nomoloS(

    .

    ' ' ) 5891 ,nahtaN & kcehnesoR(

    . , " "

  • 5

    , , -

    ) 9991 ,5991 ,yelgiF( . -

    ,

    . -

    .

    )7002 ,nomoloS & lekeD(

    ,

    .

    gnivigeraC (, .

    ,)nedruB

    ). 4002 ,.la te dlefnurG"" (

    ,smadA & ,yelgiF ,oniracsoB( -

    .)4002

    . ,

    & namlraeP(

    ) b5991 ,entivkaaS

    .

    ,

    ) 2991 ,namluB-ffonaJ ;noitpmussA dlroW( - '.

    , ,

    .

    .

    , .

    ; ; :

    . -

    . ,

  • 6

    - . ""

    )0991 ,namlraeP & nnaCcM (

    , .

    , ,

    , . ,

    .

    , , -

    , - . , ,

    ,yuG ,ydarB ;6002 ,rhegeR & reboB ;0002 ,rataneB ,.g.e, ; (

    & effilI ;0002 ,kcebdorB & uolnamarhahG ;5002 ,dleifnaC ;9991 ,wakorB & ,artsleoP

    , . ) ;0002 ,deetS

    , -

    . ,

    ,

    . ,

    (, , )

    .

    , , . ,

    ;8002 ,nomoloS & ,hconE ,lekeD ;5002 ,.la te lekeD(

    ,hcareZ ,lekeD ,nomoloS ;7002 ,civokrG & ,ciralK ,civonagoR ,civonavetS ,civoksicnarF

    ,yuG ,ydarB ;6002 ,rhegeR & reboB( ) 9002 ,hseroH &

    )5991 ,smadA-massaK ;0002 ,kcebdorB & uolnamarhahG ;9991 ,wakorB & ,artsleoP

    ,

    .

  • 7

    , , ()

    ?

    , .

    , .

    ,

    .

    . , -,

    ), 8002 ,.la te lekeD(

    ydarB ,.g.e (

    ). , 9991 ,.la te

    .

    , .

    . )8002 ,sggiR & smadA(,

    ) 3891 ,sivaD). (9991 ,yelgiF(

    , : . ,

    . . ,

    , : . ,

    . . , .

    . -

    . , ", " -

    ,yelgiF(

    , , ). 2002

    . )8891 ,sillE & ,ffitS ,relliM(

  • 8

    ). nrecnoC cihtapmE( ) noigatnoC lanoitomE(

    , .

    , ,

    , .

    . ,

    . ,

    ,). 8891 ,.la te relliM(

    , ,

    ,yelgiF(

    ). 2002

    . ,

    ,

    . -

    .

    , " " ,

    ).7002 ,nomoloS & lekeD(

    . ,

    yradnoceS ( ) 5002 ,regdaB (

    ) . sserts citamuart

    .

    ) 0102 ,ztiwobieL & eihctiRcaM (

    ,

    , .

    .

    /

  • 9

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    :

    . : , .1

    , , :

    , , , , , ,

    . , ; .

    , .0

    : .

    , , , , :

    ; . , , , ,

    . ,

    , , ,

    . ,

    . - , ,

    , , , :

    ; . , , , , ,

    ; . . ,

    .

    , 021- .

    .

  • 10

    .

    . 15

    75 27-

    ,

    . , .

    ) AVONA( -

    . DSH yekuT -

    .

    ) 64.6 = DS ,68.75 = M( .

    M( ) 20-( ) 15.4 = DS ,80.85 = M(

    , ). 59.01 = DS ,26.73 = M( ) 95.8 = DS ,62.83 =

    = M( ,

    ) 12.1 = DS ,82.3 = M( ) 11.1 = DS ,71.3

    = DS ,96.1 = M( ) 35.1 = DS ,10.2 = M(

    ) 21.3 = DS ,22.41 = M( ). 76.1

    , 39.2 = DS ,46.51 = M: (

    ). 10.1 = DS ,00.61 = M: , 13.1 = DS ,00.71 = M:

    .,

    2 .

    . :

    ). %9.78( ) %9.25(

    , ). %7.21( ) %2.90(

    :

  • 00

    ) %0.0( 5.0 ) %7.21(

    ). %0.21( 8 ) %2.90(

    . -

    . .

    ) 021( %9.27 ,

    .) 15( %0.05

    . -

    .

    , : .

    . , ,

    . )3891,sotarasileM & sitagoreD() yrotnevnI motpmyS feirB( ISB

    : 85- .

    , , , , , , ,

    . ,

    ). 0" ( ") 2" ( " ), 2-0( 5 ,

    . ISB- ,

    ) ,xednI ytireveS lareneG ISG(

    . 0- 2 85 . 85

    & ,slekciR ,sitagoreD ( ISG- ) tniop ffo-tuc (

    evitisoP( .70.1 ) 6791 ,kcoR

    . ) ,xednI ssertsiD IDSP smotpmyS

    . 2-

  • 20

    ). 2002 ,ruZ-neB & rabliG(

    . 79.2 IDSP 79.2 ISG- .)( 02.2-) ( 77.2

    . )9891 ,namluB-ffonaJ() elacS snoitpmussA dlroW SAW(

    , :

    .

    , ,

    . - : .

    .

    . , :-

    , ,

    , .: - .

    ) 0( 08-

    " ) " 1(-

    ". ) "7(

    , )68.-67. = ( .

    = ( ); 57. = (: )7220( , )57.-65. = (

    ); 47. = (; )35. = ; ()67. = (; )66. = (); 76.

    ). 37. = (); 26. = (

    ) 3891 ,sivaD) (xednI ytivitcaeR lanosrepretnI IRI(

    . 20-

    : . ,

    ; . , ; : .

    , ; . ,

    .

    " ". )5(- " " )1(- 5

  • 30

    .

    (: ). 3891 ,sivaD(

    .)96. = ( ; . = (72( ); 47. = (); 47. =

    .

    . , ,

    , ,

    . ,

    , (

    . ) ( )

    .

    -

    DSH yekuT - ) AVONAM(

    1 .

    .

    . 100. < p ,46.2 = )057 ,33(F ,13. = ecart s'ialliP,

    , ,

    ) ISG( ,

    < p), (84. = DS ,16. = M( ) 86. = DS ,88. = M(

    , , , ).10.

    . ,

    ,

    : ,

    . ,

    , .

  • 40

    ,

    , .

    .

    ,

    .

    , , .

    , ,

    , .

    , ,

    . ,

    ----- 1 -----

    ,-

    . ) AVOCNAM(

    .

    , , .

    .

    = )537 ,33(F ,81. = ecart s'ialliP -

    , . 50. < p ,34.1

    , , ). 10. < p(

    M) (47. = DS ,26. = M (

    , ). , 63. = DS ,62. =

    ) 46. = DS ,7.1 = M (

    ).23. = DS ,74.1 = M (

    1 . ,

    . " "

    DSH yekuT- ) AVONAM(

    .

  • 50

    , , . 100. < p ,26.2 = )687 ,42(F ,22. = ecart s'ialliP

    , , ,

    , , .

    .

    ,

    ). AVOCNAM( .

    , , .

    .

    . 50. < p ,17.1 = )057 ,42(F ,61. = ecart s'ialliP -

    1

    . :

    .

    . ,

    = M(( ) 56.3 = DS ,64.41 = M (

    , . 26.3 = DS ,46.21

    ) 03.4 = DS ,82.41 = M(

    ). 63.3 = DS ,57.11 = M(

    .

    . DSH yekuT - ) AVONAM(

    . , , ,

    AVONAM 0

    0 .

    .

    ----- 0 -----

  • 60

    , (

    , , )

    retnE

    .

    . 8 ,

    .

    ----- 8 -----

    8

    , .

    , .

    . ,

    . ,

    , (

    , , )

    . retnE

    8 .

    .,

    . : , ,

    ) ymmuD . (

    ). 2) (=1(=

    . , , :

    . 0

    0 . :

    ,

    ). 70.=(

  • 70

    (

    ), , " ",

    .

    ----- 0 -----

    ,

    . 5.

    .

    .

    ----- 5 -----

    .

    , :

    , .

    . ,

    & ,nomoloS ,hseroH ,lekeD ;8002 ,.la te ,lekeD ;5002 ,.la .te ,lekeD;0007, (

    ). 9991 ;5991 ,yelgiF( ) 7002 ,.le ta civoksicnarF ;9002 ,hcareZ

    , )ssertS citamuarT yradnoceS" ( ") 5991 ,yelgiF( -

    ,

    . ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ). 5991 ,naI-caM & namlraeP(

  • 80

    ).8002 ,.la te lekeD(

    ,

    ;5991 ,yelgiF( .

    ) 0991 ,namlraeP & nnaCcM

    ,kcebdorB & uolnamarhahG ;9991 ,.la te ydarB(

    , , . )5991 ,smadA-massaK ;0002

    ,driaB & snikneJ(

    ;5991 ,reizarF & nebuahcS ;4002 ,ttocsurT & ibmadaK ;7991 ,retnuH & nosnhoJ ;2002

    ). 6002 ,yaW & nesueD naV

    , .

    : ) 4002 ,ttocsurT & ibmadaK(

    , . ,

    ), 0991 ,namlraeP & nnaCcM ;5991 ,yelgiF(

    .

    . ,

    , .

    .

    .

    ,iksvolaG & ,rhoL ,ttoM ,doowlE (

    , ).1102

    .

  • 90

    , .

    , ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    :-

    ;2002 ,driaB & snikneJ ;3002 ,mahgninnuC(

    ) 5991 ,reizarF & nebuahcS ;5991 ,naI-caM & namlraeP ;4002 ,ttocsurT & ibmadaK

    ). 6002 ,yaW & nesueD naV ;2002 ,kcriB(

    & namlraeP( %08

    . ) 9991 ,sreyaM & ellinroC( %75- )5991 ,naI-caM

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    , .

    ). 1002 ,notgnirraH & ,ottaM ,smadA(

  • 12

    , . .

    , .

    ,

    .

    ) ( ,

    , .

    , .

    .

    . ) (

    , ,

    ). ,entivkaaS & namlraeP1990a(

    , ,

    ( ) (

    . ),

    ,

    .

    . )2002 ,yelgiF( -

    ). 8891 ,.la te relliM(

    .

    ,.g.e(

    , ). 9002 ,.la te tajoH

    ,

    .

  • 02

    , ). 5991 ,yelgiF(

    .

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ). 2002 ,5991 ,yelgiF(

    , " " ,

    , ). 7002 ,nomoloS & lekeD(

    " "

    . ,

    . ,

    , ,

    ). , b5991 ,entivkaaS & namlraeP ;5991 ,naI-caM & namlraeP (

    ), 1002 ,saramraM ,.g.e(

    .

    .

    ,

    , .

    .

    .

  • 22

    -

    . ,

    , - .

    ).7.-6.( ) (

    . -

    , .

    .

    . ,

    , ,

    , .

    , , . ,

    . , .

    ,

    , .

    .

    .

  • 23

    . , . , , .)( ,

    . .

    ,. ,-,. , ( . ,0227 .) , -

    . " , ,792-

    727.

    ,( .0221 .)

    . ,15 ,022-012.

    Adams, K. B., Matto, H. C., & Harrington, D. (2001). The Traumatic Stress Institute

    Belief Scale as a measure of vicarious trauma in a national sample of clinical social

    workers. Families in Society, 82, 363371.

    Adams, S. A., & Riggs, S. A. (2008). An exploratory study of vicarious trauma among

    therapist trainees. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2, 2634.

    Badger, K. (2005). Catastrophe in the workplace: Impact of indirect trauma on

    hospital social workers. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University. College of

    Social Work.

    Bell, H. (2003). Strengths and secondary trauma in family violence work. Social Work, 48,

    513-522.

    Benatar, M. (2000). A qualitative study of the effect of a history of childhood sexual abuse

    on therapists who treat survivors of sexual abuse. Journal of Trauma &

    Dissociation, 1, 928.

    Birck, A. (2002). Secondary traumatization and burnout in professionals working with

    torture survivors. Traumatology, 7, 85-90.

    Bober, T., & Regehr, C. (2006). Strategies for reducing secondary or vicarious trauma: Do

    they work? Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 6, 1-9.

  • 24

    Boscarino, J. A., Figley, C. R., & Adams, R. E. (2004). Compassion fatigue following the

    September 11 terrorist attacks: A study of secondary trauma among New York City

    social workers. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 6, 5766.

    Brady, J. L., Guy, J. D., Poelstra, P. L., & Brokaw, B. F. (1999). Vicarious

    traumatization, spirituality, and the treatment of sexual abuse survivors: A national

    survey of women psychotherapists. Professional Psychology: Research and

    Practice, 30, 386-393.

    Canfield, J. (2005). Secondary traumatization, burnout, and vicarious traumatization: A

    review of the literature as it relates to therapists who treat trauma. Smith College

    Studies in Social Work, 75, 81-101.

    Cornille, T. A., & Myers, T. W. (1999). Secondary traumatic stress among child

    protective service workers: Prevalence, severity, and predictive factors.

    Traumatology, 5, 15-31.

    Cunningham, M. (2003). Impact of trauma work on social work clinicians: Empirical

    findings. Social Work, 48, 451-459.

    Danieli, Y. (1985). The treatment and prevention of long-term effects and

    intergenerational transmission of victimization. A lesson for Holocaust survivors

    and their families. In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake: The study and

    treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (pp. 295-313). New York,

    Brunner/Mazel.

    Davis, M. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a

    multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44,

    113126.

    Dekel, R., Enoch, G., & Solomon, Z. (2008). The contribution of captivity and post-

  • 25

    traumatic stress disorder to marital adjustment of Israeli couples. Journal of Social

    and Personal Relationships, 25, 497-510.

    Dekel, R., Goldblatt, H., Keider, M., Solomon, Z., & Polliack, M. (2005). Being a wife

    of a veteran with posttraumatic stress disorder. Family Relations, 54, 2436.

    Dekel, R., Hantman, S., Ginzburg, K., & Solomon, Z. (2007). The cost of caring?

    Social workers in hospitals confront ongoing terrorism. British Journal of Social

    Work, 37, 1247-1261.

    Dekel, R., Horesh, D., Solomon, Z., & Zerach, G. (2009). Differentiation of the self and

    posttraumatic symptomatology among ex-POWs and their wives. Journal of

    Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 60-73.

    Dekel, R., & Solomon, Z. (2007). Secondary traumatization among wives of war

    veterans with PTSD. In C. R. Figley & W. P. Nash (Eds.), Combat stress injury:

    Theory, research, and management (pp. 137157). New York: Routledge.

    Derogatis, L. R. (1977). The SCL-90 Manual I: Scoring, administration and procedures

    for the SCL-90. Clinical Psychometric Research: Baltimore.

    Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in

    the validation of a new self-report scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 128,

    280-289.

    Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An

    introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 3, 595-605.

    Elwood, L. S., Mott, J., Lohr, J. M., & Galovski, T. E. (2011). Secondary trauma

    symptoms in clinicians: A critical review of the construct, specificity, and

    implications for trauma-focused treatment. Clinical psychology review, 31, 25-36.

    Figley, C. R. (2002). Treating compassion fatigue. New York: Brunner-Rutledge.

  • 26

    Figley, C. R. (1999): Compassion fatigue: Toward a new understanding of the costs of

    caring. In B. H. Stamm (Ed.), Secondary traumatic stress: Self care issues for

    clinicians, researchers, and educators (pp. 3-28).Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press.

    Figley, C. R. (1995). Compassion fatigue as secondary traumatic stress disorder: An

    overview. In C.R. Figley (Ed.), Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary

    traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized (pp. 1-20). New York:

    Brunner/Mazel.

    Figley, C. R. (1983). Catastrophes: An overview of family reactions. In C. Figley & H.

    McCubbin (Eds.), Stress and the family II: Coping with Catastrophe (pp. 3-20).

    New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Franciskovic, T., Stevanovic, A. I., Roganovic, B., Klaric, M., & Grkovic, J. (2007).

    Secondary traumatization of wives of war veterans with posttraumatic stress

    disorder. Croatian Medical Journal, 48, 177184.

    Ghahramanlou, M., & Brodbeck, C. (2000). Predictors of secondary trauma in sexual

    assault trauma counselors. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 2,

    229240.

    Gilbar, O., & Ben-Zur, H. (2002). Adult Israeli community norms for the Brief

    Symptom Inventory (BSI). International Journal of Stress Management, 9, 110.

    Grunfeld, E., Coyle, D., Whelan, T., Clinch, J., Reyno, L., Earle, C. C., ... & Glossop, R.

    (2004). Family caregiver burden: Results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer

    patients and their principal caregivers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170,

    1795-1801.

  • 27

    Hojat, M., Vergare, M. J., Maxwell, K., Brainard, G., Herrine, S. K., Isenberg, G. A., ... &

    Gonnella, J. S. (2009). The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion

    of empathy in medical school. Academic Medicine, 84, 1182-1191.

    Iliffe, G., & Steed, L. G. (2000). Exploring the counselors experience of working with

    perpetrators and survivors of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,

    15, 393412.

    Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events:

    Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113-136.

    Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma.

    New York: The Free Press.

    Jenkins, S. R., & Baird, S. (2002). Secondary traumatic stress and vicarious trauma:

    A validation study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 423432.

    Johnson, C. N. E., & Hunter, M. (1997). Vicarious traumatization in counselors

    working in the New South Wales Sexual Assault Service: An exploratory study.

    Work and Stress, 11, 319328.

    Kadambi, M. A., & Truscott, D. (2004). Vicarious trauma among therapists working

    with sexual violence, cancer, and general practice. Canadian Journal of

    Counseling, 38, 260276.

    Kassam-Adams, N. (1995). The risks of treating sexual trauma: Stress and secondary

    trauma in psychotherapists. In Stamm B. H. (Ed.), Secondary traumatic stress:

    Self-care issues for clinicians, researchers, and educators (pp. 3748). Lutherville,

    MD: The Sidran Press.

  • 28

    Lev-Wiesel, R., & Amir, M. (2001). Secondary traumatic stress, psychological distress,

    sharing of traumatic reminiscences and marital quality among spouses of holocaust

    child survivors. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 27, 433444.

    MacRitchie, V., & Leibowitz, S. (2010). Secondary traumatic stress, level of exposure,

    empathy and social support in trauma workers. South African Journal of

    Psychology, 40, 149-158.

    McCann, I. L., & Pearlman, L. A. (1990). Vicarious traumatization: A framework for

    understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of

    Traumatic Stress, 3, 131149.

    Marmaras, E. (2001). The relationship between empathy and attachment styles and

    vicarious traumatization in female trauma therapists. Dissertation Abstracts

    International, 62 (1-B), 556.

    Miller, K. I., Stiff, J. B., & Ellis, B. H. (1988). Communication and empathy as

    precursors to burnout among human service workers. Communication

    Monographs, 55, 250265.

    Pearlman, L. A., & Mac-Ian, P. S. (1995). Vicarious traumatization: An empirical study

    of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psychology:

    Research and Practice, 26, 558565.

    Pearlman, L. A., & Saakvitne, K. W. (1995a). Trauma and the therapist:

    Countertransference and vicarious traumatization in psychotherapy with in

    survivors. New York: Norton.

    Pearlman, L. A., & Saakvitne, K. W. (1995b). Treating therapists with vicarious

  • 29

    traumatization and secondary traumatic stress disorders. In C. Figley (Ed.),

    Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who

    treat the traumatized (pp. 150177). New York: Brunner Maze.

    Rosenheck, R., & Nathan, P. (1985). Secondary traumatization in the children of Vietnam

    veterans with PTSD. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 36, 538539.

    Schauben, L. J., & Frazier, P. (1995). Vicarious trauma: The effects on female

    counselors of working with sexual violence survivors. Psychology of Women

    Quarterly, 19, 49-64.

    Renshaw, K. D., Allen, E. S., Rhoades, G. K., Blais, R. K., Markman, H. J., & Stanley, S.

    M. (2011). Distress in spouses of service members with symptoms of combat-

    related PTSD: Secondary traumatic stress or general psychological distress?

    Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 461-469.

    Solomon, Z., Dekel, R., & Mikulincer, M. (2008). Complex trauma of war captivity: A

    prospective study of attachment and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological

    Medicine, 38, 14271434.

    Solomon, Z., Dekel, R., Zerach, G., & Horesh, D. (2009). Differentiation of the self

    and posttraumatic symptomatology among ex-POWs and their wives. Journal of

    marital and family therapy, 35, 60-73.

    Solomon, Z., Waysman, M., Levy, G., Fried, B., Mikulincer, M., Benbenishty, R., ... &

    Bleich, A. (1992). From front line to home front: A study of secondary

    traumatization. Family process, 31, 289-302.

    Ullman, S. E. (1996). Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in

    adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 505-526.

    Van Deusen, K. M., & Way, I. (2006). Vicarious trauma: An exploratory study of the

  • 31

    impact of providing sexual abuse treatment on clinician's trust and intimacy.

    Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 15, 6985.

  • 03

    1

    )401=N(

    =N(01(

    )=N91(

    =N(51(

    F

    DS M DS M DS M DS M

    **02.6 .)95( b.75 .)51( .11 b .)02( .72 .)99( .99a

    **12.6 .)51( b.22 .)02( .59 .)02( b.22 .)79( a90.0

    15.2 .)25( .21 .)21( .02 .)52( .02 .)22( .79

    45.2 .02 .22 .12 .99 .72 .91 .79 .29

    **62.4 .15 b.12 .21 .29 .92 .99 .79 a20.0

    45.1 .15 .21 .91 .52 .15 .25 .21 .52

    77.00** .97 b.20 .25 b.27 .71 b.15 .52 a.72

    00.9** .25 b.95 .25 b.25 .52 .72 .12 a.19

    90.5** .15 .15 .95 .25 .01 b.55 .02 a.91

    )ISG(

    05.2** .55 b.51 .05 b.06 .95 b.02 .92 a.99

    )IDSP(

    57.2** .55 b25.0 .75 b25.0 .05 b75.0 .52 a02.0

    .225 19.5 52.10 75.5 95.10 65.3 28.51 88.3 18.51

    22.0 92.5 22.00 79.5 90.00 79.3 46.01 90.4 05.11

    20.7 02.3 05.90 00.5 86.81 85.2 62.81 05.3 74.71

    02.5** 02.5 10.50 72.5 b52.70 96.3 a21.50 56.3 64.41a

    09.5** 79.5 b92.90 09.5 b01.90 34.2 85.02a 56.3 24.91

    52.0 02.5 06.61 07.5 90.20 67.3 09.51 04.3 49.51

    02.2** 05.5 05.50 25.5 b12.00 35.3 48.41a 03.4 82.41a

    .92 00.5 72.20 92.7 29.20 70.3 26.71 77.3 74.71

    . DSH yekuT )50.

  • 23

    , 0

    .

    )99=N(

    =N(95(

    )=N22(

    =N(51(

    F

    DS M DS M DS M DS M

    40.1 16. 82.3 67. 24.3 18. 32.3 18. 77.5

    91.1 55. 26.3 84. 37.3 86. 26.3 18. 51.5

    07. 94. 80.4 94. 70.4 65. 02.4 37. 20.5

    00.5

    08.2 87.

    01.1 66. 19.2 36. 78.2 77.

  • 33

    8

    r r r r ISB

    .97** .50 -.10 .90

    .55** -.00 -.07** .10

    .95** -.70 -.20* .77**

    .75** -.70 -.00 .50

    .05** .90 -.00 .20*

    .27** .00 -.50 .00

    .05** .00 -.90* .20

    .25** -.90 -.07* .20*

    .25** -.50 -.90* .20*

    .05** .00 -.20* .20

    .05** .20 -.50 .70

    SAW

    .10 .50 .00 -.20

    .90 .00 -.20 .90

    -.20* .50 .70 -.50

    .20* -.20 -.70 .10

    -.05 .90 .10 -.77*

    -.90 -.50 .20 -.20

    .50 .50 -.00 .90

    .10 .50 .20 -.10

    100. < p ** 50. < p *

  • 43

    , 0

    (

    ) (

    ) 2R 2R BES B 2R 2R BES B

    21. 21. *11. 11.

    00. 30. 00. 31.- 70. 60.-

    43.- 30. 90.- 91.- 20. 40.- ) (

    50. 80. 40. 11. 51. 61.

    80.- 00. 10.- **03. 10. 10.

    80. 02. 80. 02.

    40. 30. 10. 31.- 70. 80.-

    *23.- 30. 90.- 41.- 20. 30.- ()

    50. 80. 30. 60. 51. 80.

    11.- 00. 00.- *42. 00. 10.

    30. 60. 10. 90. 90. 70.

    70.- 90. 50.- 70.- 21. 60.-

    50. 90. 30. 20. 21. 20.

    *52. 70. 41. *62. 11. 32.

    200. < p 72.3 = )4(F) 1(

    000. < p 86.3 = )4(F ) 0( 50.

  • 53

    .5

    ISB )(

    ISB ( )

    2R 2R BES B 2R 2R BES B

    *41. 41. **81. 81.

    30. 60. 10. 90. 80. 70.

    30.- 90. 20.- 02.- 90. 61.-

    50. 90. 40. 90. 01. 80.

    **53. 60. 02. **33. 90. 92.

    200. < p 72.3 = )4(F) 1(

    000. < p 86.3 = )4(F ) 0( 50. < p*

    100.