Функциональные особенности конфликтного дискурса

2008 4152 . .

. .

( )*

. % % , % . % . : , % , %, .

Functional peculiarities of conflict discourseN. A. Belous

(Ulyanovsk State University)

Abstract: the article is dedicated to the analyses of conflict discourses functional features. The author pointed out theexistence of levels & the elements that provide the communicative integrity of conflict discourse functional & semanticrepresentation. There are functional peculiarities matrix & evidence relationship hierarchy among the elements of conflictdiscourse illocutive structure.Keywords: conflict discourse, functional & semantic representation, a functional peculiarities matrix, illocutive structure.

* , , ; . .: (8422)32$06$41. . : belous@ulsu.ru; belous66@mail.ru

$ $ $, $ . $ $ , , XX . $ , $ $ $ $ , $ $ (, 2003; , 1999; ,1969; , 1996; , 1986, 1988, 1991,2002, 2004, 2005; , 1986, 1990; , 1977;Austin, 1963; Downes, 1977; Fraser, 1975; Gale,

1976; Searle, 1977; Strawson, 1964). $ $ ; $ $ $ , $ $ , $ $, $$ .

$ $ $ $ $

2008 4 153

. $ $ .

( ) , $ , , .

, $ , $ . $ / $ .

$ , / $. , $, , . $ .

, /, . $$ . $ $ $ .

( /, ) $ $ $ . $ $

, $ , $ . $ $ $ .

$ , $ $ : , , $ , $$ $.

( 4800 $, 2457 2343 ) :

$$ ;

$$ ;

$ $ ;

, $ $ .

.

$ $ ( . . . $) ( ) ($) (, 1991). $ , $ .

$

2008 4154 . .

, $ $ , $ .

. $ $ .

$ / , $ :

...; , ...; , ; ; , ... .

(1:

?2: , !1: !2: !)

$ , $ .

, $ . $ ($, ) / .

, $$ , $ ($; , $ :

! ! !).

, $ , . , $ $ . $ , .

, , $ , , $ . , $ .

, .

, .

, $ $ $ .

.

: $.

.

$ .

, $ $: $ , $ ; $

2008 4 155

, , ; $ , $ , , , $ .

$ , $ . . , ( ) . $ $ $, $ , , , . $$ , , $ .

$ :

/ ;/; .

$ . $ , $ :

1. , : $ .

1 ( ):1 , .; 2 , .;

; ; 1 2; 1>2.1: , ,

?! (1)2: , ! (1)1: ,

, !!! (1)2. , $

$ $ .

2 (. ):1 ; 2 ; 1>2; $

; .1: , ,

. , ?(1)

2: ! (1) , , . (2)

1: , , $ , , ! (2)

2: , , , . , . (3)

, $ , , $ .

$ $ .

: , .

3 (Sheldon S. Tell me your dreams): 1 Walter Manning, $

, $; 2 Alette; 1>2; ; $.

1: This has to be a unanimous decision. Mydaughters a professional artist he looked atAlette not a dilettante. She did this as a favor.We cant turn her down. (1)

2008 4156 . .

2: But, Walter . (1)1: No, sir. This has to be unanimous. We are

either giving him my daughters painting or wedont give him anything at all. (2)

2: I ... like her painting very much. Lets giveit to the pastor. (2)

$ $ $ , $ , .

$ , $ . / . , $ .

, $, , , .

4 (Show I. Nightwork.) $ :

1 Dr. Patterson, $ ; 2 Jim Cleary; 1>2; ; ; $ .

1: Do you have any idea how late it is? (1)()

2: I am sorry, sir. The party. (1) ()1: Dont give me any of your goddamn

excuses. Who the hell do you think you arefooling? (2)

2: Im not. (2)1: From now on, you keep your goddamned

hands off my daughter, do you understand? (3)2: Sir. (3)1: You keep out of this. He was screaming

now, Cleary, I want you to get the hell out of here

and stay out. If I ever see you around here again,Ill break every bone in your body. (3) ()

$ , $ .

, , , , $, $ . $ $ , .

, $ $ $ .

(Dagen W. Problem child), $ $$ :

(2)

2008 4 157

, . , $$ $ , : $ ($ ); $ ; $ $ , $ $ .

$ $, $, , $ $ .

$ . $ $ $ .

, . . (2003) $

// // 2003. . . 45 48.

, . . (1999) // $ // . : . . 47.

, . .(1969) , , . .

, . . (1986) // $ . . 17. . :. . 153158.

, . . (1986) $$ //

. . . . . 1017., . . (1988)

$. . : , .

, . . (1991) $, // : . . . . : . . 8299.

, .., , .. (2004) $: ..: . . 246.

, . . (2005) $ $$. . : .

, . .(1990) // $ . : . . $.

, . .(1986) $ // . : . . $.

, . . (1987) $ : // . 2. . 7783.

Austin, J. L. (1963) Performative Constative// Philosophy and Ordinary Language. Urbana :Univ. of Illinois Press. P. 2254.

Downes, W. (1977) The Imperatives andPragmatics // Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 13. 1.P. 7797.

Fraser, B. (1975) Hedged Performatives /. Fraser. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. SpeechActs / ed. by P. Cole, J. L. Morgan. N. Y. etc. :Academic Press. P. 187210.

Gale, R. (1976) Do performative utteranceshave any constative function // The Journal ofPhilosophy. Vol. 67. No. 12. P. 117121.

Searle, J. R. (1977) A Classification ofIllocutionary Acts // Proceedings of the TexasConference on Performatives, Presuppositions andImplications. Arlington : Univ. Press. P. 2745.

Strawson, P. F. (1964) Intention andConvention in Speech Acts // PhilosophicalReview. Vol. 72. P. 439460.