JHGT-19.4(170) (2012-12) ISSN 1025-9678
170
3D Fabric Used in the Shoe-Pads Comfortableness to Assess
, C. H. Chiu, W. H. Hsing
Department of Textile Engineering, Chinese Culture
University
W. H. Hsing : [email protected]
EVA (HR278TN
HR430HR249HR023HR029) EVA EVA
HR430
4mmEVA 0.5 0 61%
4mmEVA G 8.7
EVA 0.63 84%G 14.3
EVA EVA
3D
ABSTRACT
Most of shoe-pads combine fabric with. In this experiment, we
use the shoe-pads which combines 3D
Fabric with EVA foaming material compare with the shoe-pads
which combines knitted fabric with
EVA foaming material that we have seen usually, and estimated
which is more comfortable by theirs
functions of shock-absorbing, preventing slide and compression.
According the experiment, the
shoe-pads combine HR430 with 4mm EVA foaming material is better
than others, its attrition
modulus(0.5) is the highest of 3D fabrics, its change rate is
the second low(61%), its value of G in the
shock-absorbing test is the lowest(8.7)(Low is better).
Comparing with the shoe-pads which
combines knitted fabric with EVA foaming material that we have
seen usually--- attrition
modulus(0.63), change rate(84%), value of G(14.3). Though the
preventing slide of the shoe-pads
which combines 3D Fabric with EVA foaming material is worse, but
others functions are much better
than the shoe-pads which combines knitted fabric with EVA
foaming material.
Keywords: 3D fabric, Insole
171
1.
:
:
2.
2-1
(1)
1
(2)
2
(3)
[2]
1[2]
2[2]
2-2
3
(1)
172
(2)
(3)
[2]
2~3
3(Mpa)[3]
2-1
4
4
3.
3-1
(1) PK(58,240,
)
(2) HR029(:T150/36,16%,
:T150/1,68%,:T150/36,16%,
)
(3) HR430 (T150/48,42%,
T50/1,38%,T75/36,20%,
)
(4) HR249 (:T150/48,35%,
T30/1,30%,T75/36,35%,
)
(5) HR023 (T75/3611%,
T30/1,26%,T150/48,63%,
)
(6) HR278TN(T75/36,38%,
T30/1,10%,N200/24,52%,
)
(7) EVA()
3-2
(1)
(2)
(3) (
)
(4)
(5) ()
(6) (YW120803-RHM
)
173
3-3
(1) :
(2) : EVA
(3) :
(4) : 5
5
3-4
3-4-1
CNS3560 6
290.5mm
12.70.5mm()
50 6
30
CS(t0t1/t0t2) 100
CS t0
t1 t2
6
3-4-2
ASTM - D1894
1530cm2
15010
mm/min 100mm
7
7
174
3-4-3
ASTM-D3754 8
290.5mm22 12.70.5mm
600mm (500mm)
G
G
8
3-5
PK
EVA
:>>>=
:>>>>
1
EVA
1mm 2mm 4mm
HR278TN() 1 2 3
HR430() 1 2 3
HR249() 1 2 3
HR023() 1 2 3
HR029() 1 2
2
1 0.3mm 1 0.25mm
2 0.4mm 2 0.35mm
3 0.6mm 3 0.55mm
1 0.42mm 1 0.25mm
3 0.52mm 2 0.35mm
3 0.72mm 3 0.55mm
1 0.6mm 2 0.7mm
4.
4-1
9 EVA
9
73%( 1 2)
11% 31%(
1) 53%
EVA
EVA 1
175
4-2
10 EVA
11 ()
10 0.63
0.5
11
:>
4-3
12 EVA G
13 EVA
G
12 G
14.3 12.8( 1)
8.2( 1)
PK
EVA
EVA : 1(1mm) 3(8.7):
EVA G
13 G
36mm 48mm( 2)
G
176
5.
(1) EVA1mm
(84%)1(73%)
1(31%)1(37%)1(49%)1
31%
(2) HR430
0.50.63
(3)
>>>>
(0.5)>(0.45)>(0.4)>(0.3)=
(0.3)0.5
(4) GEVA4mm
(14.3)2(8.7)
3(9.3)3(9.2)3(9.3)3(8.7)3
8.7
(5) EVA
2,48mm36mm
(6)
3(HR4304mmEVA)
0.5G8.7
248mm50mm
4mmEVA
359%61%
1 Ashley Goodman, Foot Orthoses in Sports
Medicine, SoutherMedicalJournal, 97, 867-870
(2004)
2
8
-24(2006)
3
1-24(2009)
4
1-5 (2010)
5
1-2(2000)
6 HaraldJagos,Walter Hlauschek, Johannes Oberz
aucher, MartinReichel and WolfgangL. Zagler,
A Multimodal ApproachforInsole Motion Me
asurement and Analysis, ScienceDirect,3103,2-
4(2010)
