44(2015.8), 191221

*1)__ __

**1)

. . . .

[: , , , , , ]

, , , , . , . MBSR MBCT .

. . 2015 2 , 333 . 6 . 6 3. . 1979 MBSR .

. . .

. . , , .

* 2014 () (NRF-2014S1A5B6A02049047). 40 .

** : () . nikaya@naver.com

192 44

.

.

.

,

.

,

.

(

, ) ,

.

.

, () (, 1089-1163)

.

.

1) .

. , .

(), (, ), (),

1) Morten Shltter, Silnet Illumination, Kung-an Introspection, andcompetition for Lay Patronage in Sun Dynasty Chan, in Buddhism inthe Sung, ed. Peter N. Gregory and Daniel A. Getz, Jr.(Honolulu :kuroda Institute, University of Hawaii, 1999) p. 111. (2010)pp. 165-166 .

193

(), (, ), (), (

), (), (), (),

(), (), 42 62

, () ()

. ()

() ()

.2)

,

. ,

.3)

. ,

.

.4)

.

.

() .

2) http://www.dlibrary.go.kr/JavaClient/jsp/wonmun/full2.jsp?v_kw_str=%E6%AD%A6%E5%BA%AB&v_db=1&v_doc_no=5445&mode=1

3) (2012) , . . . .

4) (2001) p. 6. .

194 44

.

,

.

.

.

2003 8 8

.5)

. 2004 2 '

' 12

. 2003 2005

. 2005 5

' -' 2

.

2000

. 2010 8

,

.

.

, ,

,

.

,

. 2011

5) , (2003 8 19)

195

.

,

,

.

.

.6)

,

, .

. .

6) (2013) ? 13(2000-2012) . + 95 , 8.4% 8 . , 13 . , pp. 244ff .

77 112 :

2014 11 202015 1 222015 2 1

87 57 333

196 44

333

. 333

.

135

,

198 .

198

.

63 4

9 3

8

18

, 17

13

135

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

1976

1993

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

2013 814 16

231916

131415159

1153

641111111

[ 1 ]

:

197

[ 1] , 2000 1

. 2003 2005

15.3

.

6 .7)

198 6 192

.

2010

.

.

7) . ,David Brazier(2007) ; (2006) ; H. (2012) . . .

1 - , -

2008

2() () ()

2011

3 ,

2011

4 :

, ,, ,,

2013

5 :

2013

6 , (, , )

,,

2014

198 44

.

1 2000

2 2004

3 2006

4 2006

5 - 2006

6 2006

7 2006

8 ()

2006

9 () () ()

2007

10()

2008

11 2008

12 -Theravda

2008

13 ; --

2008

14 2008

15 2009

16 2009

17 :

2010

18 ()

2010

19 2010

20 : ()

2010

21

2011

22 2011

23 2011

24 2012

25 2012

26 2013

199

,

.

.

,

.

.

.

,

.

.

.

1.

.

27 ()

2014

200 44

.8)

.

.

3 4

(CQ

R : The Consensual Qualitative Research)

.

(field) .

,

9), 10)

. .

8) (2013) , ? . , 20002012 414 , 130, 19, 38, 95 . 8 , 7 . .

9) ;,(2011) p. 339ff10) (2013) p. 246ff.

/

201

,

.

,

.

, . .

.

,

.11)

,

. 2

.

1 ,

(jhna)

.

.

(

) ,

11) . , . . , .

202 44

.

.12) ,

.

2

, ,

.

.

5

,

.

,

.

?,

.

8 6

.

.

6

.

12) (2003) . zen therapy( ) ,, , . , . .

203

, , ,

.

. MBSR sati

.

,

.

, .

.

( 2, 3,

6) .

( 5). ,

.

,

.

.

1970

.

MBSR

.13)

13) Donald McCoun, et al.(2010) p. 5. Mindfulness . 2010

204 44

Zen meditation

, Zen

. 14)

. E

EG .15)

. fMRI MRI

16) .

.

12 11 . .( (2013) p. 111)

14) T. Takahasi et al.(2005) 20 , , . (Su-soku) (EEG)(ECG) , Cloniger (TCI) . zen meditation , . .

15) Pei-Chen Lo, et al.(2003).16) Giuseppe Pagnoni, et al.(2007) 3 (ZenMeditation) 13 13 (cerebral gray matter) MRI . , , . , . . . .

205

(Bernard Faure) .

Buddhist Meditation and neuroscience 17)

.

.

,

.

,

. ,

.

2. 18)

() ()

() . , ()

,19)

17) Bernard Faure(2011) Buddhist Meditation and neuroscience Buddhismand the future world( 100 )

18) . , . , . .

19) (2013) p. 65 ; (2011) p. 23.

206 44

() .20)

() (, 1089-1163)

.

,

.21)

.22)

. .23)

,

.

. , , . () , .24)

.20) (2005) p. 51. .21) ,(2012) p. 32.22) (2011) p. 187. , , , , () . ; (2006) p. 422 . () , .

23) (2011) p. 126.24) (2006) pp. 12-13.

207

.

,

.

,

.

. .

2 .

() . . () . [] [] . [] . . .25)

() .

.

,

. .

.26)

25) , (T.51, p. 219c).

26) 5(, pacanvarani), () . (kukkucca), .

208 44

.27)

.

.

. 2006

(42%) ,

5%,

2% .28)

.29)

,

30) .

.31)

,

.

.

.

, 23

. (npnasati) . Anlyo Bhikkhu(2014) p. 216. (Rollo May) , , , . .((2013) pp. 325-326)

27) (2014) p. 201.28) , (2006) p. 119.29) , (2006) p. 118.30) (2014) p. 203.31) (2012) p. 2. , 15% .

209

19 ,

.32)

. ,

15%

33), .

,

.

() ()

.

.

41 .

3 .

[] , . .34)

() , ()

.

, .

,

. .

. (),

, .

.

32) (2012) p. 9.33) (2006) p. 119.34) (T47, 376b)

210 44

, /

.

.

, . . , . , .35)

/ .

, . .

, .

/.

/

.

.

.

.

, . . , . , .36)

,

.

35) (2011) pp. 32-33.36) (2011) p. 196.

211

.

.

3.

,

.

. .

,

. 1700

. .

37)

.

.

, . . , , , .

37) (X70, No.1401, p. 708b) 3 . (), (), ().(2011) p. 210. .

212 44

, .38)

, .

.39)

.

.

. .

.

. , , .40)

,

.41)

38) (2013) pp. 424-425.39) . () , () ,() .((2006) p. 501)

40) ; (2012) p. 14. ; (2011) pp. 143-144. .41) , . (2011) ,

213

42)

.

,

.

.

.

.

.

, () ()

43) .

, , .

.

. ,

.

.

,

.

.

,

. .

42) (2011) p. 143.43) ; (2012) p. 33.

214 44

. .

.

.

.44)

.

.

.

, , ,

. .

,

.

MBSR MBCT

.

.

.

,

.

.

44) . , .

215

.

,

. 2015 2

, 333

.

6 . 6

3 .

. 1979 (Jon Kabat-Zinn)

MBSR

.

.

.

.

.

,

.

.

45) .

,

,

.

45) (2011) p. 356.

216 44

(T. 51)(T. 47)(X. 70)T : X :

(2006). . : , 2006.(2013). --''

, 71, 2013 (2010). :

, , , :

(2013). :

, 71.(2003). , 6. (2013). ?.

: .

;(2011). ,

23 2.(2013). .

36.(2012). , ,

. : , .

(2011). ( ). : .

(2011). , ,

, 30. (2011). ( ).

217

: .

(2014). , 71 1.(2006). . : . (2012). ,

23 2.(2011). . :

.

(2012). ,

, 26.; (2012). . : . (2006). 2006 :

, , Vol. 2, no. 2. H. (2012). , : (2005). . : .(2001). ,

16(2011). ,

17 2.

Anlyo Bhikkhu(2014). Satipahna . : .

Bernard Faure(2011). Buddhist Meditation and neuroscience

Buddhism and the future world(

100 ).

David Brazier(2007). . : .Donald McCoun et al(2010). Teaching Mindfulness-A Practical

Guide for Educators. New York : Springer.Giuseppe Pagnoni et al(2007). Age effects on gray matter

volume and attentional performance in Zen meditation,

Neurobiology of Aging 28Pei-Chen Lo et al(2003). EEG Alpha Blocking Correlated with

Perception of Inner Light During Zen meditation, The

218 44

American Journal of Chinese Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 4.T. Takahasi et al(2005). Changes in EEG and autonomic nervous

activity during meditation and their association with

personality traits, International Journal ofPsychophysiology 55.

219

Abstract

Ganhwaseon and Psychotherapy : Focusing on Current Research Trend

Lee, Pilwon

Dongguk University(Gyeongju)

Today, we are faced with a variety of problems. Themost severe one might be the psychological unhealthiness.Diseases due to stress and negative emotions such as anxi-ety, depression and anger affect not only the individualslife, but also people around including family members, whicheventually develop into a social problem.

In this social atmosphere, practice or meditation be-gan to receive unprecedented amount of social interest. Notonly Vipassan which is the traditional southern practicemethod, but also popularized programs such as MBSR orMBCT that applied Vipassan are currently contributing tosolving diverse psychological problems of modern people.

Meanwhile, a unique practice method calledGanhwaseon has been early developed in Northeast Asia tobe succeeded to this day. Recently, research on Ganhwaseonfrom an aspect of psychotherapy is budding in Korea.However, quantitative research on Ganhwaseon() isnot yet comparable to other practice method such asVipassan.

This paper examines the previous studies that con-templated on the psychotherapeutic effectiveness and char-acteristics of Ganhwaseon and confirmed the inherence ofsuch characteristics in the tradition of Ganhwaseon. For thispurpose, research papers related to Ganhwaseon that were

220 44

ever published in Korea before February in 2015 weresearched, which gave out a list of 333 papers. However,there were only six papers that involved psychotherapy.Among these six, only three were the papers that verifiedthe psychotherapeutic effectiveness using psychologicalmethod.

Meanwhile, there are very few papers regarding thepsychotherapeutic effectiveness of Ganhwaseon in overseasas well. Ever since Doctor Jon Kabat-Zinn developed MBSRprogram in 1979, the psychotherapeutic effects of Buddhistcontemplation has been proceeded merely focused on thepractice in southern Vipassan.

The reason that there are scarce domestic researcheson Ganhwaseon from an aspect of psychotherapy can be at-tributed to the inherent limits of Ganhwaseon. The biggestchallenge of Ganhwaseon is that practice is impossible un-less there is a teacher who had precisely cleared Hwadu.Moreover, Ganhwaseon requires a one-on-one approach forsolving Hwadu() and checking between teacher andpupil. In that sense, there are several limitations forGanhwaseon to become a public program.

Nevertheless, Ganhwaseon has outstanding psychother-apeutic effects that stand comparison to any otherperformances. This can be confirmed in the literature reviewon the previous domestic studies.

If we properly give life to the characteristics ofGanhwaseon and broaden a new level of understanding froma psychological aspect, Ganhwaseon can be reborn as apsychotherapeutic method that possesses a very significantmeaning to us in these days.

Keywords : Ganhwaseon(), Hwadu(),Psychotherapy, Psychological Unhealthiness,

221

Anxiety, Vipassan

: 2015 7 16

: 2015 7 28 8 25

: 2015 8 25