1

: :

. : 2008-2009 : : : 12.30 - 14.00 ( , )

1. 07. 11. 2008: : ,

. 2. 14. 11. 2008: : 3. 21 . 11. 2007: : 4. 28. 11. 2008: : 5. 05.12.2208: : 6. 12. 12. 2008: : 7. 19. 12. 2007: : 8. 09. 01. 2009: : -

. - . 9. 16. 01. 2009: :

. : ().

2

10. 23. 01. 2009: : (). 11. 06. 02. 2009: : . : (I). 12. 13. 02. 2009: : (). 13. 20. 02. 2009: :

. : (II).

14. 06. 03. 2009: : (). 15. 13. 03. 2009: :

. : (IV).

16. 20. 03. 2009: :

. 17. 27. 03. 2009: :

. : ().

18. 03. 04. 2009: :

(I) 19. 10. 04. 2009: :

. : (I).

20. 08. 04. 2009: :

(II) 21. 15. 05. 2009: Visit of University of Alabama: Studing Religion 23. 22. 05. 2009: Visit of University of Alabama: Studing Religion 24. 29. 05. 2008: :

. : (II).

25. 05. 06. 2009: :

3

26. 12.06. 2009: : .

26. 19.06.2009: :

4

. . 1. . S. Cain, Study of Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The

Encyclopedia of Religion 14 (1987), 64-83. . E.J. Sharpe, Methodological Issues in the Study of

Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 14 (1987), 83-88.

. Th. L. Benson, Religious Studies in an Academic Discipline, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 14 (1987), 88-92.

. J. R. Hinnells, Why study Religion, in: J. R. Hin-nells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Reli-gion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005,pp. 5-20.

. D. Wiebe, Religious Studies, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 98-124.

. N. Smart, Comparative-Historical Method, M. Elia-de (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 3 (1987), 571-574.

. J. Sharpe, Comparative Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 3 (1987), 578-580.

. W. E. Paden, Comparative Religion, in: J. R. Hin-nells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Reli-gion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp.208-225.

. U. Bianchi, History of Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 6 (1987), 399-407.

E. J. Sharpe, The Study of religion in historical per-spective, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 21-45.

. D. Allen, Phenomenology of Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 11 (1987), 272-284.

. -----------, Phenomenology of Religion, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, ,pp. 182-207.

. J. W. Heisig, Psychology of Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 12 (1987), 57-65.

. R. I. J. Hackett, Anthropology of Religion, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005,pp. 144- 163.

5

. H. B. Partin, Classification of Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 3 (1987), 527-531.

: 23. 01. 2009 . 06. 02. 2009 . 28. 02. 2009. 2. . U. Bianchi, The History of Religions, Leiden, 1975,

. 30-45 . 201-220. . W. L. King, Religion, M. Eliade (ed.), The

Encyclopedia of Religion 12 (1987), 282-292. . J. Z. Smith, Religion, Religions, Religious, M. C.

Taylor (ed.), Critical Terms for Religious Studies, Chicago London, 1998, . 269-284.

. W. Braun, , W. Braun R. T. McCutcheon (), (. . . . . ), , 2003, . 29-52.

. Cl. Geertz, (. . . ) (), : - ), 2003, . 95-131.

: 20. 03. 2009. 3. . J. Waller M. Edwardsen, Evolutionism, M. Eliade

(ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 5 (1987), 214-218. . H. G. Kippenberg, Discovering Religious History in

the Modern Age (transl. B. Harshav), Princeton, 2002, . 36-97 . 125-195.

. U. Bianchi, The History of Religions, Leiden, 1975, . 61-113 .169-191.

. . . (.), , . , , 1986.

: 03. 04. 2009 . 08. 05. 2009. 4. . K. W. Bolle, Myth, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclo-

pedia of Religion, vol. 10(1987), 261-272 . P. Ricoeur, Myth and History, M. Eliade (ed.), The

Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 10(1987), 273-281. . R. Segal, Myth and Ritual, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.),

The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 355-378.

. . , . - 20 ( : . ), , 2004.

6

. G. Lease, , W. Braun R. T.McCutcheon (), (. . . . . ), , 2003, . 675-687.

: 05. 06. 2009.

5. . B. G. Myerhoff- L. A. Camino- E. Trurner,Rites of Passage, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 12(1987), 380-386.

. V. Turner, A Few Definitions, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 12(1987),386.

. P. Olivelle, Hindu Rites, M. Eliade (ed.), The Ency-clopedia of Religion, vol. 12(1987), 387-391.

. D. K. Eickelman, Muslim Rites, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 12(1987),

. A. van Gennep, Rites of Passage (transl. M. B. Vize-dom G. L. Caffee), Chicago, 1960.

: 19. 06. 2009

7

.

A. 1.

. M. P. Nilsson, (. . . . ), , 21977.

. -----------, (. . . ), , 1979. . . , , 1987.

. W. Ptscher, , . (.), ( , 12), , 1992, . 146-155.

. . , , , . (.), , .,, . 155-160.

. W. Burkert, . (. . . . -. , . . ), , 1993.

. L. Bruit Zaidman- P. Schmitt Pantel, ( ) (. . ,. . .), , 2002.

. J. P. Vernant, (. . ), , 2000.

. ----------------, - (. . . ), : , 2003.

. ---------------, (. . , . ), - 2003.

. R. Seaford, . - (. . ), , 2004.

. Chr. Sourvinou-Inwood, What is Polis Reli-gion, in: O. Murray-S. Price (eds.) The Greek City from Homer to Alexander, Oxford,1998 (reprint), . 295-322.

8

. R. Buxton (ed.), Oxford Readings in Greek Religion, Oxford, 2000.

. G. Casadio, How to write a Survey of Greek Religion from the Point of View of the Comparative Study of Religion , in: L. H. Martin P.Pachis (eds.), Theoretical Frameworks for the Study of Greco-Roman Religions, Thessaloniki, 2003, 53- 66.

. Simon, Price, Religion of the Ancients Greeks (Key Themes in Ancient History), Cambridge, 1999.

. R. Parker, Miasma. Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion, Oxford, 1983.

. -----------, Athenian Religion. A History, Oxford, 1996.

. -------------, Polytheism and Society at Athens, Oxford, 2005.

. J. Bremmer, Greek Religion, Oxford, 1994 (1999).

. D. B. Dodd Chr. Faraone (eds.), Initiations in Ancient Greek Rituals and Narratives, London-New York, 2003.

.

1.

. M. Beard J. North- S. Price, Religions of Rome, vols. I-II, Cambridge, 1998.

. J. Scheid, Roman Religion. An Introduction (transl. J. Lloyd), Bloomington, In., 2003.

. G. Alfldy, (. . ), , 21992.

. P. Garnsey- R. Saller, . , (. . . . . . . ), , 1995

9

2.

. 1.

, . 1-11.

2. . , , 16-17.

: 16. 01. 2009

. 1.

, . 330-338. 2.

IG II2 1237 3.

, , 446-474

4.

. , . 472-483. . , , . 139-159. 324-356. 372-412 . , , . 1-40

: 06. 02. 2009 . . :

1. , . 651-654 . 1124-1134. 2. , 160.

. :

. , , 768-824.

10

.

6, 280 . 281 .

1. , 62 2. , 12 .21

3. 34. : 20. 02. 2009. . .

1. , 55, 3 2. 16 3. , 241-253.

.

() , . 655e

.

, , 372-380.

: 13. 03. 2009

11

2.

. . pomerium , in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, . 93-96.

. , in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, . 30-33.

: 27. 03. 2009

. . , in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, . 102-106.

. , in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, . 148-160.

: 10. 04. 2009. . . , in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, . 78-93

. , in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, .116-147.

: 29.05. 2009

12

.

1 : O

1. Friedrich Schleiermacher, 2. Friedrich Max Mller, 3. Edward Burner Tylor, 4. William Robertson Smith, 5. James George Frazer, 6. Sigmund Freud, 7. mile Durkheim, 8. Max Weber, 9. Aby M .Warburg,

10. Nathan Sderblom 11. Robert Ranuph Marett, 12. Wilhelm Schmidt, 13. Rudolf Otto, 14. Marcel Mauss, 15. Arnold van Gennep, 16. Carl Gustav Jung, 17. Bronislav Kaspar Malinowski, 18. Gerardus van der Leeuw, 19. Friedrich Heiler, 20. Joachim Wach, 21. Edward Evan Evans-Pritchard, 22. Victor Witter Turner, 23. Mircea Eliade.

: M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclpedia of Religion, . 1-16, New York London, 1987.

: 06. 02. 2009

2: . : ) 27. 03. 2009 1) 2009

) .

) (10) , .

1) ( ).

13

2) (, .). .

) ( ) .

When you hand it in, your Annotated Bibliography should include: (1) A title that clearly defines your specific area of research; (2) An introduction of approximately 600 words (2 pages) that summarizes your chosen topic and explains the coherence of the ten sources you have chosen to include (that is, why these and not others); (3) Ten sources, numbered and listed alphabetically in correct bibliographical form (sources must be published materials, not web sites, unless you have specific reason to think that web sources are necessary for your research); (4) A brief annotation (two or three sentences) under each source, explaining the basic point of the source and how it is relevant to your topic. Please also put an asterisk (*) next to the number for each source that you have read in its entirety. Instructions for Book Review Essay The review essays assigned for this course should include three features. (1) A balanced summary of the books contents The content of a scholarly book on a subject in the past (history) has several dimensions. (A) Topic. Imagine that you are reviewing this book for readers who have not read it themselves. Your paper should begin with a concise description of the central topic that is treated in the book. Is the author trying to solve a historical puzzle? What is the puzzle and why is it one? Is the author trying to come up with a new view of an historical period or phenomenon? What period or phenomenon? And, why is the old view such that the author would write a book to try to correct it? A reader should have a clear indication of what the book is about after reading the first paragraph or two of your review. (B) Authors approach. Since history is a bundle of raw traces of human doings in the past, any reconstruction of a period, an event, a person, a social trend, and so forth, requires of the author of a history book, or a book on an ancient text, to say something on her/his perspective. This includes historiographical suppositions and how they differ from those of other historians who specialize in the same historical period or subject, statements of what counts as evidence and why, why some evidence is more valuable than other evidence, how different kinds of evidence may be related. Your review of the book should indicate that you are aware of the authors interests, his aims and his theoretical vantage point. Usually this sort of information is most explicitly indicated in a books front end (preface and introduction) and often reiterated in the books concluding pages (conclusion, epilogue). (C) Evidence. What evidence does the author rely on? Where and how is the evidence found? In short, your review should indicate what data supports the authors argument. (D) Argument. How does the author evaluate the evidence, or, how does he/she try to persuade the reader that it is reliable? What are the key arguments made on the basis of the evidence? Are the arguments coherent with the evidence and in relation to each other? That is, do his arguments work together to generate the main conclusion(s) of the book?

http://library.osu.edu/sites/guides/chicagogd.htmlhttp://library.osu.edu/sites/guides/chicagogd.html

14

(2) Critical evaluation of the authors views, methods and arguments To be critical does not mean to be sneeringly negative; it means to make judgments, to point out strengths/weaknesses, positives/negatives, of the authors approach, arguments and conclusions. Does the author persuade you? If so, why? If not, why not? You may feel you do not have enough expertise to assess what the author is up to. On the one hand, dont worry, because you are not expected to assess his work beyond the knowledge and critical judgment that you have. On the other hand, for this part of the review you should inform yourself. Check the Religion Index to see if any other scholars have reviewed his book. Do some research in the relevant scholarly journals on the same topic. Browse through the authors bibliography and read some entries that strike you as potentially informative or that contribute to the debate. The bottom line is that I will look for evidence that you have read the book thoughtfully and made some attempt to locate it within a wider scholarly debate. (3) A statement on your own critical reaction This is where you think critically about how the book has contributed to your understanding of Greco-Roman Religions. In writing your review, you might use the above three points as a scheme for organizing your paper. You may follow a different organizational structure, provided that all three features described above are evident in your review. Begin your review with a title which includes the full bibliographic record of the book you are reviewing. If you rely on other scholarly work for insights, acknowledge your sources and append a list of works cited

15

. . :

1. , Sir Samuel Baker, 1866 , . .

2. .

3. .

. 1. 2.

16

: , : . : 2008 - 2009 : : : 14.30 - 16.00 ( , )

1. 07. 11. 2008: : -

. - - ;

2. 14. 11. 2008: : 3. 21. 11. 2008: : 4. 28. 11. 2008: : 5. 05. 12. 2008: : 6. 12. 12. 2008: : 7. 19. 12. 2007: : 8. 09. 01. 2009: : . 9. 16. 01. 2009: :

- .

17

10. 23. 01. 2009: : -

(). 11. 06. 02. 2009: :

( / - -).

1 . 12. 13. 02. 2009: : -

() 13. 20. 02. 2009: :

-.

2 . 14. 06. 03. 2009: : -

() 15. 13. 03. 2008: :

.

16. 27. 03. 2009: :

() 17. 03. 04. 2009: : - 18. 10. 04. 2009: : () 19. 08. 05. 2009: :

20. 15.05. 2009: Visit of University of Alabama: Studying Religion. 21. 22. 05. 2009: Visit of University of Alabama: Studying Religion.

18

22. 29. 05. 2009: : - 21 ()

23. 05. 06. 2009: :

(). 24. 12.06.2009: : -

21 (I). 3 .

26. 19. 06. 2009: :

(). 4 .

19

.

. L. H. Martin, Rationalism and Relativity in History of Reli-

gious Research, in: Jeppe Sinding Jensen Luther H. Martin (eds.), Rationality and the Study of Religion, London New York, 22003, . 145-156.

. M. Hulsether, Religion and Culture, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 489-508.

. S. Micloughlin, Migration, diaspora and transnationalism: transformaitons of religion and culture in a globalizong age, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Reli-gion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 526-547

: 09. 01. 2009 A. (I)

1. . R. T. McCutcheon, Methods, Theories, and the Terrors of History. Closing the Eliadean Era with Some Dignity, in: Br. Rennie (ed.), Changing Religious Worlds. The Meaning and the End of Mircea Eliade, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2001, . 11-25.

. W. Ch. Beane, Methodological, Pedagogical Reflections on Mircea Eliade as Historian of Religion, in: Br. Rennie (ed.), Changing Religious Worlds. The Meaning and the End of Mircea Eliade, .., .165-189 . K. Knott, Insider/outsider perspectives, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 243-258.

: 23. 01. 2009

(II) 2. . R. Permenter, Romantic Postmodernism and the li-

terary Eliade, in: R. Brenie (ed.), Changing Religious Worlds. The Meaning and the End of Mircea Eliade, .., . 95-116

. Donald Wiebe, Religion and the Scientific Impulse in the nineteeth Century: Friedrich Max Mller and the Birth of Science of Religion, in: Donald Wiebe, The Politics of

20

Religious Studies. The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy, New York 1999, . 9-30.

. R. King, Orientalism and the Study of Religions, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon - New York, 2005, J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 275- 290

: 13. 02. 2009. (II) 3. . -------------------, Phenomenology of Religion as Reli-

gio - Cultural Quest: Gerardus van der Leeuw and the Sub-version of the Scientific Study of Religion, in: Donald Wiebe, The Politics of Religious Studies. The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy, .., . 173-190. . -------------------, The Study of Religion: On the New Encyclopedia of Religion, in: Donald Wiebe, The Politics of Religious Studies. The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy, .., . 197-204.

: 06. 03. 2009 B. -

() . 1. . Arvind, Sharma, What is Reductionism, in: Thomas

Idinopoulos Edward A. Yonan (eds.), Religion & Reductionism. Essays on Eliade, Segal & the Challenge of the Social Sciences for the Study of Religion (Studies in the History of Religions, NUMEN BOOKSERIES, LXII), Leiden-New York- Kln, 1994, . 127-142. . Robert A. Segal, Reductionsim in the Study of Reli-gion, in: Thomas Idinopoulos Edward A. Yonan (eds.), Religion & Reductionism. Essays on Eliade, Segal & the Challenge of the Social Sciences for the Study of Religion, .., . 4-14. . Wayne, Elzey, Mircea Eliade and the Battle of Redu-ctionism, in: Thomas Idinopoulos Edward A. Yonan (eds.), Religion & Reductionism. Essays on Eliade, Segal & the Challenge of the Social Sciences for the Study of Reli-gion, .., . 82-94. . Donald, Wiebe, Beyond the Sceptic and the Devotte: Reductionism in the Scientific Study of Religion, in: Tho-mas Idinopoulos Edward A. Yonan (eds.), Religion & Re-

21

ductionism. Essays on Eliade, Segal & the Challenge of the Social Sciences for the Study of Religion, .., . 108-125. . George, Weckman, Reductionism in the Classroom, Thomas Idinopoulos Edward A. Yonan (eds.), Religion & Reductionism. Essays on Eliade, Segal & the Challenge of the Social Sciences for the Study of Religion, .., . 211-219. . . Barnes, Religious Pluralism, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 407-422.

: 27. 03. 2009.

2. -

. . Sung - Hae Kim, The History of Religion: Retrospect and Prospect, in: Ugo Bianchi (ed.), The Notion of Reli-gion in comparative Research. Selected Proceedings of the XVI IAHR Congress (with the cooperation of Fabio Mora and Lorenzo Bianchi) (Storia delle Religioni, 8), Roma, 1994, . 897-899. . Ninian Smart, Retrospect and Prospect: The History of Religion, in: Ugo Bianchi (ed.), The Notion of Reli-gion in comparative Research. Selected Proceedings of the XVI IAHR Congress (with the cooperation of Fabio Mora and Lorenzo Bianchi) (Storia delle Religioni, 8), Roma, 1994, . 901-903. . Donald Wiebe, Transcending Religious Language: Towards the Recovery of an Academic Agenda, in: Ugo Bianchi (ed.), The Notion of Religion in comparative Re-search. Selected Proceedings of the XVI IAHR Congress (with the cooperation of Fabio Mora and Lorenzo Bianchi) (Storia delle Religioni, 8), Roma, 1994, . 905-912. . Giulia Sfameni Gasparro, History of Religions: A Retrospective and Prospective View, in: Ugo Bianchi (ed.), The Notion of Religion in comparative Research. Selected Proceedings of the XVI IAHR Congress, .., . 913-917. . Ugo Bianchi, Concluding Remarks: The History of Religions Today, in: Ugo Bianchi (ed.), The Notion of Re-ligion in comparative Research. Selected Proceedings of the XVI IAHR Congress, .., . 918-921. : 10. 04. 2009.

22

. : (). 1. . Donald Wiebe, The Failure of Nerve in the Aca-

demic Study of Religion, in: Donald Wiebe, The Politics of Religious Studies. The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy, New York, 141-162. . -----------------, Appropriating Religion: Understan-ding Religion in the Object of Science, in: Donald Wiebe, The Politics of Religious Studies. The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy, .., .279-295. . G. Moiser, Religion and Politics, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 423-438.

: 29. 05. 2009 2. : -

(II). . Th. Dixon, Religion and Science, in: G. Moiser, Religion and Politics, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routled-ge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 456-472. . A. W. Geertz, Cognitive Approaches to the Study of Religion, in: P. Antes, A.W. Geertz, R. R. Warne (eds.), New Approaches to the Study of Religion, vol II: Textual, comparative, Sociological and Cognitive Approaches (Religion and Reson,vol.43), Berlin-New York, 2004, pp. 347-399. . Harvey Whitehouse, Modes of Religiosity: Towards a Cognitive Explanation of the Sociopolitical Dyna-mics of Religion, Method and Theory for the Study of Religion 14, 3-4 (2002), 293-315. . --------------------------, Implicit and Explicit Know-ledge in the Domain of Ritual, in: Ilkka Pyysiinen Veik-ko Anttonen (eds.), Current Approaches in the Cognitive Scinece of Religion, London-New York, 1992, . 133-152. . Luther H. Martin, Cognition, Society and Religion: A New Approach to the Study of Religion, Culture and Religion 4, 2 (2003), 207-231. . ----------------------, Religion and Cognition, in: J. R. Hinnells, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, Abington, Oxon- New York, 2005, pp. 473- 488.

23

. ----------------------, Ritual Competence and Mithraic Ritual, T. Light B. Wilson (eds.), Religion as a Human Capacity. A Festschrift in Honor of E. Thomas Lawson, Lei-den 2003, . 245-263.

: 12. 06. 2009

24

. .

1. . , , : , 2002. 2. Fr. W. Walbank A. E. Austin u.a. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, . VII, 1: Hellenistic World, Cambridge, 21984. 3. ------------------------------------------------------, The Cambridge Ancient World, . VIII: Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 B.C., Cambridge, 21989. 4. P. Green, From Alexander to Actium, London, 1990 5. Fr. Walbank, (. . . . . . ), , 1993.

6. H. J. Gehrke, (. . . . . ), , 2000.

7. A. Erskine (ed.), A Companio n tgo Hellenistic World (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World), Malden-Oxford-Carlton,Victoria, 2003. 8. Fr. Chamoux, Hellenistic Civilization (tr. M. Roussel), Malden-Oxford, Melbourne-Berlin, 2003. 9. W. S. Ferguson, Hellenistic Athens. An Historical Essay, Chicago, 1974 (reprint, 1911) 10. J. D. Mikalson, Religion in Hellenistic Athens (Hellenistic Culture and Society), Berkeley-Los Angeles-London,1998. 11. L. H. Martin, Hellenistic Religions. An Introduction, Oxford, 1987.

12. ----------------,The Anti-individualistic Ideology of Hellenistic Culture, Numen 41 (1994), 117-140.

13. ----------------, Hellenistic Religions, .. ., 2000, .1-18 14. J. Z. Smith, Hellenistic Religion, Encyclopedia -Britanica, . 8, Chicago 151985, 749-751. 15. ---------------, Here, There and Anywhere, in: idem, Relating Religion. Essays in the Study of Religion, Chicago-London, 2004, pp. 323-339.

25

16. W. Burkert, Ancient Mystery Cults, Cambridge, Ma. -London, 1987.

17. A. D. Nock, Conversion. The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo, Oxford, 1965 (reprint).

18. , , . : -. , , 2003

.

1. . M. Austin, The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest. A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation, Cambridge, 22006.

:

. . 117, 223: Exemption from taxes for new citizen at Teos (c. 300).

. . 133, . 245: Decree of Delos in honour of Aristoboulos of Thessalonica, sitones of Demetrius II of Macedon (239-229).

. The incorporation of new deities, in: M. Beard-

J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 41-49.

: 16. 01. 2009. 2. . M. Austin, The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest. A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation, Cambridge, 22006.

. . 136, . 251: The Athenian ephebeia in the

Hellenistic Age (266/5).

. . 145, . 265: Decree of the Dionysiac artists in honour of a benefactor (between 197 and 166).

. From human to divine: becoming god, in: M. Beard-

J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 49-54.

26

: 06. 02.2009. 3. . M. Austin, The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest. A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation, Cambridge, 22006.

. . 255, . 448: A poem in praise of

Ptolemy II Philadelphus (late 270s).

. . 271, . 470: The Canopus Decree: the Egyptian priests honour Ptolemy III and Berenike (4 March 238).

. The calendar of Rome: the month April, in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, p. 67.

: 20. 02. 2009.

4. . M. Austin, The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest. A Selection of Ancient Sources in Translation, Cambridge, 22006.

. . 326, . 569: The Potters Oracle.

. Astrology, in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price

(eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 189-190

: 13. 03. 2009.

5. . The cult of Mithras, in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 88-91.

. Ceremonies of Magna Mater and Isis, in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 132-137

27

. The taurobolium in the rituals of Magna Mater, in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.), Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 160-162.

. Isis, in: M. Beard-J. North-S. Price (eds.),

Religions of Rome, vol. II: A Sourcebook, Cambridge,1998, pp. 297-319.

: 03. 04. 2009.

6. ( )

: 08.05.2009 .05.06.2009 . 19g. 06.2209

28

. 1. The agora, not surprisingly now lost its political

associations, and became an exclusively commercial center, surrounded by god owns, banks, and shopping arcades: religion in the form of temples, was more often than not relocated elsewhere, while culture retreated to private or royally patronized institutions. ( 10 . )

: 06. 02. 2009

2. ( Tom Holt, [. . ], : , 2002

) , . , . , , , , . , , . , . , . (. 341).

) , , . , , . ,

29

, . . , . , . (. 360).

) ,

. (.375).

) , . , . , , . . (.380).

: 20. 02. 2009

3. : ) 05. 06. 2009

) 2009.

4. Walt Disney, Lion King ( ).

: ) , 11, 355B- 22, 359E.

) J. G. Griffiths (ed.), Plu-tarch, de Isde et Osiride (edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary), London 1970, pp. 289-378.

) U. Bianchi, Seth, Osiris et l ethnographie, in: U. Bianchi (ed.), Selcted Essays on Gnosticism, Dualism and Mysteriosophy (Studies

30

in the History of Religions [Suppplement to Numen, XXXVIII], Leiden, 1978, . 103- 125.

) Arnold van Gennep, The Rites of Passage (transl. M. B.Vizedom - G. L.Caffe. Introduction S.T. Kimball), London-Henley,1965 (reprint).

) V. Turner, Rites of Passa-ge, M. Eliade (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Religion 12 (1987), 380-386.

: 19. 06.2009.

31

.

) .

) (10) , .

1) ( ).

2) (, .). .

) ( ) .

When you hand it in, your Annotated Bibliography should include: (1) A title that clearly defines your specific area of research; (2) An introduction of approximately 600 words (2 pages) that summarizes your chosen topic and explains the coherence of the ten sources you have chosen to include (that is, why these and not others); (3) Ten sources, numbered and listed alphabetically in correct bibliographical form (sources must be published materials, not web sites, unless you have specific reason to think that web sources are necessary for your research); (4) A brief annotation (two or three sentences) under each source, explaining the basic point of the source and how it is relevant to your topic. Please also put an asterisk (*) next to the number for each source that you have read in its entirety.

Instructions for Book Review Essay The review essays assigned for this course should include three features. (1) A balanced summary of the books contents The content of a scholarly book on a subject in the past (history) has several dimensions. (A) Topic. Imagine that you are reviewing this book for readers who have not read it themselves. Your paper should begin with a concise description of the central topic that is treated in the book. Is the author trying to solve a historical puzzle? What is the puzzle and why is it one? Is the author trying to come up with a new view of an historical period or phenomenon? What period or phenomenon? And, why is the

http://library.osu.edu/sites/guides/chicagogd.htmlhttp://library.osu.edu/sites/guides/chicagogd.html

32

old view such that the author would write a book to try to correct it? A reader should have a clear indication of what the book is about after reading the first paragraph or two of your review. (B) Authors approach. Since history is a bundle of raw traces of human doings in the past, any reconstruction of a period, an event, a person, a social trend, and so forth, requires of the author of a history book, or a book on an ancient text, to say something on her/his perspective. This includes historiographical suppositions and how they differ from those of other historians who specialize in the same historical period or subject, statements of what counts as evidence and why, why some evidence is more valuable than other evidence, how different kinds of evidence may be related. Your review of the book should indicate that you are aware of the authors interests, his aims and his theoretical vantage point. Usually this sort of information is most explicitly indicated in a books front end (preface and introduction) and often reiterated in the books concluding pages (conclusion, epilogue). (C) Evidence. What evidence does the author rely on? Where and how is the evidence found? In short, your review should indicate what data supports the authors argument. (D) Argument. How does the author evaluate the evidence, or, how does he/she try to persuade the reader that it is reliable? What are the key arguments made on the basis of the evidence? Are the arguments coherent with the evidence and in relation to each other? That is, do his arguments work together to generate the main conclusion(s) of the book? (2) Critical evaluation of the authors views, methods and arguments To be critical does not mean to be sneeringly negative; it means to make judgments, to point out strengths/weaknesses, positives/negatives, of the authors approach, arguments and conclusions. Does the author persuade you? If so, why? If not, why not? You may feel you do not have enough expertise to assess what the author is up to. On the one hand, dont worry, because you are not expected to assess his work beyond the knowledge and critical judgment that you have. On the other hand, for this part of the review you should inform yourself. Check the Religion Index to see if any other scholars have reviewed his book. Do some research in the relevant scholarly journals on the same topic. Browse through the authors bibliography and read some entries that strike you as potentially informative or that contribute to the debate. The bottom line is that I will look for evidence that you have read the book thoughtfully and made some attempt to locate it within a wider scholarly debate. (3) A statement on your own critical reaction This is where you think critically about how the book has contributed to your understanding of Greco-Roman Religions. In writing your review, you might use the above three points as a scheme for organizing your paper. You may follow a different organizational structure, provided that all three features described above are evident in your review. Begin your review with a title which includes the full bibliographic record of the book you are reviewing. If you rely on other scholarly work for insights, acknowledge your sources and append a list of works cited

33

34