Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
15 2 35-65 2019 / Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 35-65 Summer 2019
當前國際戰略理論─發展與前景
15 2 2019/ 36
壹、前言
strategy
Carl von Clausewitz
On War
war as the continuation of politics by other means
2012 18 20
Christensen, 1996: 7; Freedman, 2013
B. H. Liddell-Hart
grand strategy
Thomas Schelling Colin Gray
Schelling, 1980: 5
Martel, 2015:
121 national security
international
system
Brands, 2014: 3
70
37
貳、霸權衰退與國際戰略選擇
strategic adjustment Dueck, 2004:
512 1945
liberal internationalism Layne, 2017: 262-63, 267
balance of power
(liberal
international order)
Dueck, 2004: 513 Barry R. Posen Andrew
L. Ross neo-isolationism
selective engagement cooperative security
primacy Posen & Ross, 1996
15 2 2019/ 38
unilateral
internationalism
entangling alliances Sloan, 2003
forward-deployment Posen & Ross, 1996
selective engagement
Posen &
Ross, 1996: 5-53
Hoffman, 2013
collective
security hegemonic stability
39
Hentz, 2005: 1558-59
Sloan, 2003; Posen & Ross, 1996
imperialism
Hoffman, 2013:
46-51 assertive interventionism
state-building
Hoffman, 2013
Copley, 2008:
4
15 2 2019/ 40
Layne, 1998: 8-9
George Kennan
containment
Marshall Plan
NATO
1970 Henry Kissinger
détente
Getchell,
2017: 249-50 1
Francis Fukuyama end
of history Layne, 2017:
10-14
1
41
Friedman, 2003
new world order
engagement and enlargement
1990
Layne, 1998: 8
1945
Gowan,
2003: 30 1987 Paul Kennedy
imperial overstretch The Rise and Fall of
the Great Powers
15 2 2019/ 42
Martel,
2015
1945
commercial liberalism
1930 economic nationalism
Layne, 1998
third
pillar 1995
43
Nye, 1990; 2004
soft power
hard power
smart power
19
geopolitics
Halford J. Mackinder Alfred T.
Mahan Nicholas J. Spykman
1 2
3 rimland
containment
Okuyama, 2015
National Interest, 2017: 5
Salman & Bick, 2017
primacy
2003
restraint Stephen Walt John Mearsheimer
offshore balancing 1
15 2 2019/ 44
1
參、九一一事件後國際戰略理論發展
dominate
1920
1930
1950 /
1990
2000
2010
2018
/
45
1989 7
Heilbrunn, 2015
2008
strategic
competitor
selective
engagement
neoconservatives
America’s unipolar moment
2001 9 11
alliance
15 2 2019/ 46
coalitions of the willing 2
Donald Rumsfeld
flexible coalition
Taliban
al-Qaeda
Sloan, 2003
Krauthammer, 2004: 15 democratic
realism
low-intensity conflict
nation-building
Tier, 2014: 51-64; Rigby, 2003: 19
2
Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.
47
weapons of
mass destruction, WMD states of concern
Rees & Aldrich,
2005: 905 3 1990 RMA
exceptionalism
Schwenninger, 2003
deterrence
preventive
pre-emptive global war
against terrorism homeland
security Bush
Doctrine
Condoleezza
Rice a common security framework for
the great powers share a common security agenda Sanger,
3 regional multilateralism
global unilateralismRees & Aldrich, 2005
15 2 2019/ 48
2002 Sloan, 2003
Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty
military
adventurism Lin, 2016
Crimea
al Qaeda Islamic State, ISIS
regime change
the rise of the rest
49
Amsden, 2001
1
liberal hegemony
4
security dilemma
Friedman & Logan, 2016: 14
power transition
Ikenberry, 2018
4 H. R. McMaster National
Economic Council Gary CohnMcMaster
& Cohn, 2017
15 2 2019/ 50
1︰
World Bank 1945 global governance
World Bank
1945Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank,
AIIB New Development Bank
IMF 1945
WTO
1947
SWIFT
1973 SWIFT
Paris Agreement
2015 2017
NATO
1949
EU 1957 Euroscepticism
1951
1953SMA
1960
AsianDevelopment Bank
1966AIIB
ASEAN
1967
NAFTA
1994 2018USMCA
n.a. 2019: 2-3, table 1
51
2011 11 Pivot to the
Pacific
heavy-handed
2012
21 Sustaining
U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense White House,
2012
Stephen Walt
offshore balancing
Ghimis,
et al.: 2012
2011
11 Darwin
2012 1
21 Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for
21st Century Defense
60%
Chuck Hagel 2013 6 60%
2014 4
Senkaku Islands
10
pivot strategy
2012
15 2 2019/ 52
Pant & Joshi, 2015 2011 11
Trans-Pacific Partnership, TPP
de Santis, 2012
Mearsheimer & Walt: 2016, 70-71
liberal hegemony
indispensable nation
revisionism
Mearsheimer & Walt:
2016, 70-71
Fortress America
offensive realism
Mearsheimer, 2014 Stephen Brooks
William Wohlforth deep engagement
retrenchment
Brooks & Wohlforth,
2016; Roskin, 2016
offshore
balancer
53
failed state
Layne, 1998
Layne, 2017 1945 Pax
Americana
Rothkopf, 2017
Make America Great Again
Layne, 2017: 10
2025
15 2 2019/ 54
Mint, 2018
Vladimir Putin
great
gentleman
primacy without
purpose
TPP
North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA
Transatlantic Trade
and. Investment Partnership, TTIP 2019 2 2
(Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, INF) 1987
INF 500-5,500
Taliban
Rodrigo
Duterte
Posen, 2018: 26-27
55
Graham
T. Allison Thucydides Trap
Burt, 2017: 8
David
M. Edelstein Ronald R. Krebs Foreign Affairs
1986 Goldwater-Nichols Act
Edelstein & Krebs,
2015
Ionut C. Popescu
Popescu, 2016
adaptive strategy
15 2 2019/ 56
Popescu, 2016
David Edelstein Ronald Krebs
Betts 2000: 50-50
strategy-making
Edelstein & Krebs, 2015: 109-16 Henry Mintzberg
emergent strategy
Moore, 2011; MacDougall, 2014
Kaine, 2017
operational plans
Joffe, 2015
leading from behind we don’t have
a strategy yet
1945
57
less interventionist strategy of geopolitical restraint
Layne, 2017: 10
Trump Doctrine
zero-sum
tactical transactionalism
Zenko & Lissner, 2017
extended deterrent
1970
zero-sum transactionalism
Zenko & Lissner, 2017
肆、結語
strategic theory strategic studies
Garnett, 1975
15 2 2019/ 58
Feaver, 2009
Brands & Kahl, 2017
Zenko & Lissner, 2017
1945
59
Layne, 2017:13-14
hybrid
negative perception spiral
Layne, 2017: 271
15 2 2019/ 60
參考文獻
Amsden, Alice H. 2001. The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Betts, Richard K. 2000. “Is Strategy an Illusion?” International Security, Vol. 25, No, 2, pp. 5-50.
Brands, Hal, and Colin Kahl. 2017. “Trump’s Grand Strategic Train Wreck.” Foreign Policy, January (https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/31/trumps-grand-strategic-train- wreck/) (2019/5/16)
Brands, Hal. 2014. What Good is Grand Strategy? Power and Purpose in American Statecraft from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Brooks, Stephen G., and William C. Wohlforth. 2016. America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burt, Richard. 2017. “A Grand Strategy for Trump.” National Interest, No. 149, pp. 5-8.
Copley, Gregory R. 2008. “Grand Strategy in an Age of Tactics.” Defense and Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 4-7.
De Santis, Hugh. 2012. “The China Threat and the ‘Pivot’ to Asia.” Current History, Vol. 111, No. 746, pp. 209-15.
DeYoung, Karen. 2017. “Do Campaign Statements and Tweets Add up to a Trump Foreign Policy Strategy?” Washington Post, January 10 (https://www.washing tonpost.com/world/national-security/do-campaign-statements-and-tweets-add-up-to-a-trump-foreign-policy-strategy/2017/01/10/1b366cb8-d2b5-11e6-a783-cd3fa950f2fd_story.html?utm_term=.a63db1cab45b) (2018/12/12)
Edelstein, David M., and Ronald R. Krebs. 2015. “Delusions of Grand Strategy: The Problem with Washington’s Planning Obsession.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 94, No. 6, pp. 109-16.
Feaver, Peter. 2009. “What is Grand Strategy and Why Do We Need It?” Foreign Policy (https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/04/08/what-is-grand-strategy-and-why-do- we-need-it/) (2018/9/9)
Freedman, Lawrence. 2013. Strategy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Friedman, Benjamin H., and Justin Loga. 2016. “Why Washington Doesn’t Debate
61
Grand Strategy.” Strategic Studies Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 14-45. Friedman, Thomas L. 2003. “A Theory of Everything.” New York Times, June 1
(https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/01/opinion/a-theory-of-everything.html) (2018/8/5)
Garnett, John. 1975. “Strategic Studies and Its Assumptions,” in John Baylis, Ken Booth, John Garnett, and Phil Williams, eds. Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies, pp. 3-21. London: Croom Helm.
Getchell, Michelle. 2017. “Book Review: What Good is Grand Strategy? Power and Purpose in American Statecraft from Harry S. Truman to George W. Bush, by Hal Brands.” War in History, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 249-50.
Ghimis, Ana-Maria; Monalisa Giuglea, Cristiana Maria; Alina Mogos. 2012. “America’s New Grand Strategy: An Inherited Step Back?” Strategic Impact, No. 44, pp. 98-110.
Gowan, Peter. 2003. “U.S. Hegemony Today.” Monthly Review, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 30-50.
Hadar, Leon. 2015. “Why There Is No Obama Doctrine?” American Conservative, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 44-46.
Heilbrunn, Jacob. 2015. “What Is America’s Purpose?” National Interest, No. 139, pp. 18-45.
Hentz, James J. 2005. “International Relations Theory, Communitarianism, and U.S. Grand Strategy: Whither Africa?” American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 48, No. 12, pp. 558-76.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. “Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive?” Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 17-29.
Joffe, Josef. 2015. “The Unreality of Obama’s Realpolitik.” Wall Street Journal, February 4 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/josef-joffe-the-unreality-of-obamas- realpolitik-1422923777) (2018/12/12)
Kaine, Tim. 2017. “A New Truman Doctrine: Grand Strategy in a Hyperconnected World.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 36-53.
Krauthammer, Charles. 2004. “In Defense of Democratic Realism.” National Interest, Fall, pp. 15-25 (http://users.clas.ufl.edu/zselden/Course%20Readings/Krauthammer. pdf) (2018/12/7)
Layne, Christopher. 1998. “Rethinking American Grand Strategy: Hegemony or Balance of Power in the Twenty-first Century?” World Policy Journal, Vol. 15, No.
15 2 2019/ 62
2, pp. 8-28. Layne, Christopher. 2017. “The Big Forces of History.” American Conservative, Vol.
16, No. 1, pp. 10-14. Layne, Christopher. 2017. “The US Foreign Policy Establishment and Grand Strategy:
How American Elites Obstruct Strategic Adjustment.” International Politics, No. 54, pp. 260-75.
Lin, Shaohan. 2016. “The Public Costs of Grand Strategy in the Trump Era.” World Affairs, Vol. 179, No. 3, pp. 4-23.
MacDougall, James. 2014. “Strategy: A History.” Parameters, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 103-107 (https://search.proquest.com/docview/1565829994?accountid=13838 (2018/12/11)
McMaster, H. R., and Gary D. Cohn. 2017. “America First Doesn’t Mean America Alone.” Wall Street Journal, May 31 (https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-first- doesnt-mean-america-alone-1496187426) (2018/12/12)
Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, updated ed. New York: W. W. Norton.
Mearsheimer, John J., and Walt, Stephen M. 2016. “The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 70-83.
Mint. 2018. “Donald Trump’s Grand Strategy.” July 31 (file:///C:/Users/Genuine/ Downloads/Donald-Trumps-grand-strategy-ProQuest.pdf) (2018/12/7)
Moore, Karl. 2011. “Porter or Mintzberg: Whose View of Strategy Is the Most Relevant Today?” Forbes, March 11 (https://www.forbes.com/sites/karlmoore/2011/ 03/28/porter-or-mintzberg-whose-view-of-strategy-is-the-most-relevant-today/?fbclid=IwAR2AKECP5Q_u7F0oRYPb7QxRWt(TX1cOfopPKiWdHyFrwT3WeMNogkszLj4k#1f11533c58ba) (2018/12/11)
n.a.. 2019. “Global: ‘Liberal International Order’ to Face Growing Strains, With or Without US.” Political Risk Strategy, Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 2-5.
National Interest. 2017. “What Next for Donald Trump?” No. 147, pp. 5-24. Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power.
New York: Basic Books. Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New
York: Public Affairs. Pant, Harsh V., and Yogesh Joshi. 2015. “Indian Foreign Policy Responds to the U.S.
Pivot.” Asia Policy, No. 19, pp. 89-114.
63
Political Risk Strategy - APRIL 2019. 2019. London: Fitch Solutions Group Limited. (https://search.proquest.com/docview/2199520324?accountid=13838) (2019/4/13)
Popescu, Ionut C. 2016. “Strategic Uncertainty, the Third Offset, and US Grand Strategy.” Parameters, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 69-80.
Popescu, Ionut C. 2018. “Grand Strategy vs. Emergent Strategy in the Conduct of Foreign Policy.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 438-60.
Posen, Barry R. 2018. “The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 20-27.
Posen, Barry R., and Andrew Ross. 1996. “Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy.” International Security, No. 21, pp. 5-53.
Rees, Wyn, and Richard J. Aldrich. 2005. “Contending Cultures of Counterterrorism: Transatlantic Divergence or Convergence?” International Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 905-23.
Rigby, William. 2003. “Nation Building: An Essential Army Task.” (https://apps. dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a420138.pdf) (2018/12/7)
Roskin, Michael G. 2016. “Rebalancing Offshore Balancing.” Parameters, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 7-11.
Rothkopf, David. 2017. “How Bush, Obama and Trump Ended Pax Americana.” Washington Post, June 27 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/ wp/2017/06/27/how-bush-obama-and-trump-ended-pax-americana/?utm_term=.867fc528f6bd) (2018/12/12)
Sanger, David E. 2002. “Bush to Formalize a Defense Policy of Hitting First.” New York Times, June 17 (https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/17/world/bush-to- formalize-a-defense-policy-of-hitting-first.html) (2018/7/23)
Schelling, Thomas. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Schwenninger, Sherle R. 2003. “Revamping American Grand Strategy.” World Policy Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 25-44.
Sloan, Elinor. 2003. “Beyond Primacy: American Grand Strategy in the Post-September 11 Era.” International Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 303-19.
Smith, M. L. R. 2011. “Strategic Theory: What It Is … and Just As Importantly, What It Isn’t.” E-International Relations, April 28 (http://www.e-ir.info/2011/04/28/ strategic-theory-what-it-is%E2%80%A6and-just-as-importantly-what-it-isn%E2%80%99t/) (2018/7/23)
15 2 2019/ 64
White House. 2012. “Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense.” (http://archive.defense.gov/news/Defense_Strategic_Guidance.pdf) (2018/7/24)
Tier, David. 2014. “The Waning Grand Strategy of Democratization: Why a Pivot to the Asia-Pacific Places the United States at Greater Risk of Terrorist Attack.” Connections, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 51-64.
Von Clausewitz. Carl. 2012. On War. North Charleston, N.C.: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.
William C. Martel. 2015. Grand Strategy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zenko, Micah, and Rebecca Friedman Lissner. 2017. “Trump Is Going to Regret Not Having a Grand Strategy.” Foreign Policy, January 13 (https://foreignpolicy.com/ 2017/01/13/trump-is-going-to-regret-not-having-a-grand-strategy/) (2018/12/12)
65
Current International Strategic Theory: Development and Prospects
Yu-Ming Tsai Associate Professor, General Education Center, Shih Chien University
(Kaohsiung Campus), Neimen, Kaohsiung TAIWAN
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to summarize the current international strategic theory and look forward to answering the following three questions: What is the characteristic of international strategic development after the end of the Cold War to September 11 attacks? What are the academic and policy changes in the international strategy after the September 11 incident? What are the characteristics of the current international strategy? Finally, the conclusion is to try to explore the development and prospects of current international strategic theory. Before the end of the Cold War until the September 11th attacks, the United States’ international strategy still held the dominant strategy of “American leadership.” After the September 11 incident, the United States faced the challenge of “the rise of the rest” and involved many international issues. Donald Trump’s victory also represented the rise of populism. He redefines the security interests of the United States and frees the United States from overseas conflicts without directly affecting US security. It also makes the allies of other countries feel uneasy, that “the United States will rule the world” will no longer exist, and even the United States has emerged as an “emergent strategy,” making bilateral and zero-sum traderism outperform strategic considerations in Trump’s thinking.
Keywords: strategy, international strategy, national security, homeland security
15 2 2019/ 66
/ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False
/CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice