37.064.1 40 1 2008 152-171 ISSN 0579-6431 DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI0801152P

* ,

. - , . 60 305 60 (37 23 ) . ( ) - . -, , . -, , . - ( , - ). ( , , -, ), - ( - - , ). - , , , (-). - , - , , - . : , , , , , .

- , - . - ,

* E-mail:npolovina@rcub.bg.ac.yu

153

. , - /

- . - . - - (Farrell & Jo-nes, 2000; Piorkowska, 2007). , (Fergusin, 2005). , - , - - (Anderman & Anderman, 2000). - - , /- - , (Ahuja, 2008). - , , , , - .

, , , - , - , , , , . - - -- (Epstein & Jansorn, 2004; Redding et al., 2004; Gus-key et al., 2006; Waden & Westat, 2006). /- ( ) -, - . , ,

154

(Ruckerting, 1997).

, , , - , - . , (Farrell & Jones, 2000; Mitra, 2006) - , - / , -, , , -. (Guskey, El-lender & Wang, 2006; Waden & Westat, 2006) - ( , ), , - (Davis & Lambie, 2005; Joksimovi i Bogunovi, 2005; Maksi i urii-Bojanovi, 2005), , - (Polovina 2007; Dinovi, Pavlovi i Miloevi, 2007). - , : -/ , - , - . , - (Anderman & Anderman, 2000), - - , , .

, : , , - -, , (), (Scribner & Scribner 2001; Fergusin, 2005a; Waden & Westat, 2006; Polo-vina i Stanii, 2007). -

155

( , , ) : - , - / .

- / , , . - , , , - , , - (Voji-Markovi, 1996; Polovina, 2007; Polovina, 2007a).

- , e - (/, / ), , , ( ), (Berrera & Warner, 2006).

- . -, ( -) -- (Joksimovi i Bogunovi, 2005). , - IMSS-2003 , , - . (- ) 3% , 26% , ( i urii-Bojanovi, 2005: 257). , - / (Joksimovi i Bogunovi, 2005).

. ( , - ). - ( ) -

156

/. , , . - - ( ) , , ( -, ) - . ( ) -, (Kumar, 2006) - , - -. , , .

( ) , , , / (Guskey et. al., 2006; Waden & Westat, 2006). -/ , , -. , , (Polovina, 2007), - - . : -, , , , , , , .

:

(Fergusin, 2005; Berrera & Warner, 2006; Guskey et. al., 2006; Mitra, 2006; VanBalkam i Mijatovi, 2006; Waden & Westat, 2006) , - , : () ,

157

() - ( ), () - - () . ( ), - / , .

- : () - , () ( , ), () (VanBalkam i Mijatovi, 2006). - , - , , - , - . (Pintrich, 2000) . , - , -, , . ( ) - .

. - , - . - , , - . , - , (, 2006: 36). -

158

-.

, , - , , - . ( ) / . (- ) - , (Guskey, Ellender & Wang, 2006: 23) - , - . - (VanBalkam i Mijatovi, 2006), -. - . , ( - ), ( - ), , -- - , - , - , . , .

:

(Polovina, 2007; Polovina i Stanii, 2007) . - - . , -, , - - .

159

, , , -, , . , . - , ( - , , , - , ) - / ( 1), - ( 2) - ( 3). -/ -.

, - , -, ( - ) . -, , -, ( - , ), (, , ), -/ (, , , ), (, , -) (, ). , - ( - ), ( ) . - , - , - .

1.100 - . ,

160

, (, ,* ) 60 (37 23 ) ( 60) ( 305) - . - ( , - , , - ). - (65,5%), 15 25 (52,2%), ( 15 ), ( 25 ). - (67,9%). 25 - 37,2% , 24,6% 15 24 , 22,9% , ( ) 15,3%.

. - (22 /) (35 /). ( ) . , , . - - ( ), ( ) - ( ) . , , .

, - , , - .

, ( ).

* - ( ),

TIMSS - 2007. , , .

161

: - . () (F(7) = 47,88; p

162

/ - - .

1(,): 1: 1:

CINIOCI

87654321

pros

ecne

pro

cene

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

CINIOCI87654321

pros

ecne

pro

cene

2.8

2.6

2.4

2.2

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

: (): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. () / 6. / 7. / 8. /

: -. - ( , , , ).

- (F(4)=55,50; p

163

, , (F(4)=69,81; p

164

( 3): , , . - ( , ) - .

- (F(5)=55,78; p

165

-. , , ( - ) - , . , -. (- ) , - (Berrera & Warner, 2006; Guskey et. al., 2006; Mitra, 2006), - ( ). , , - - , (Polovina, 2007; Dinovi i Pavlovi, 2007). - ( ), ( ).

: . - . - ( / -) - (F(9)=66,71; p

166

(F(2)=3,21; p

167

. - (-, ), ( -), , ( ). , , , , , - . - , , / , , , -, , . - (, -) , , , - ( 65,5% ) ( - 67,9% ) , - .

, /. - , . (, ) ( ). - , - , .

-/ - . , ( , , , -) . - - : ( 10% -

168

; 5% ); - ; - ( - , - ).

(-) , , /, , , -.

. , 149001 (2006-2010), - .

Anderman, L. & E. Anderman (2000): Concidering contexts in educational psychology:

introduction to the special issue, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 39, No. 2, 67-68. Ahuja, J. (2008): Bronfenbrenner ecological theory. Retrieved February 15, 2008 from the

World Web Wide http://www.mymontessoriacademy.com/newsletters/websitebronfenbrennere

Berrera, J. M. & L. Warner (2006): Involving families in school events, Kappa Delta Pi Record, Vol. 42, No. 2, 72-75.

Davis, K. M. & G.W. Lambie (2005): Family engagement: A collaborative, systemic ap-proach for middle school counselors, Profesional School Counceling, Vol. 9, No. 2, 144-151.

Epstein, J.L. & N.R. Jansorn (2004): School, family and community partnerships link the plan, Educational Digest: Essential Readings, Condensated for Quick Rewiew, Vol. 69, No. 6, 19-23.

Farrell, C. M. & J. Jones (2000): Evaluating stakeholder participation in public-services- pa-rents and schools, Policy and Politics, Vol 28, No. 2, 251-262

Fergusin, C. (2005): Organising family and community cennections with schools: how do school staff build meaningful relationships with all stakeholders? Southwest Educatio-nal Developemental Laboratory, AustinTexas. Retrieved from the World Web Wide http//www sedl.org/connections/

Fergusin, C. (2005a): Reaching out to diverse populations: what can schools do to foster family-school connections? Southwest Educational Developemental Laboratory, Aus-tin Texas, Retrieved from the World Web Wide http//www. sedl.org/connections/

Guskey, T., C. Ellender & S. Wang (2006): Evaluating a community-wide parent/family in-volvement program, Paper presented at the Anual meeting of the American educational association. San Francisco, C.A.: College of Education, University of Kentucky.

Joksimovi, S. i B. Bogunovi (2005): Nastavnici o kontekstu nastave i postignua uenika; u R. Antonijevi i D. Janjetovi (ur.): TIMSS 2003 u Srbiji (270-292). Beograd: Institut za pedagoka istraivanja.

169

Klanje, S. (2006): Profesionalni razvoj nastavnika u evropskim zemljama; u V. D. VanBal-kam i S. Mijatovi (ur.): Struno usavravanje: iskustva edukatora za edukatore (19-36). Kanadska agencija za meunarodni razvoj CIDA.

Kumar, R. (2006): Students experiences of home-school dissonance: the role of school aca-demic culture and perceptions of classroom goal structure, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 31, 253-279.

Maksi, S., M. urii-Bojanovi (2005): Direktori o kontekstu nastave i postignua uenika; u R. Antonijevi i D. Janjetovi (ur.): TIMSS 2003 u Srbiji (249-270). Beograd: Institut za pedagoka istraivanja.

Mitra, D. (2006): Yuth as bridge between home and school: Comparing student voice and parent involvement as strategies for change, Education and Urban Society, Vol. 38, No. 4, 455-480.

Piorkowska, K. (2007): Uloga porodice u funkcionisanju kole: primer Poljske i drugih zemalja evropske unije; u N. Polovina i B. Bogunovi (ur.): Saradnja kole i porodice (68-76). Beograd: Institut za pedagoka istraivanja.

Pintrich, P. (2000): Educational psychology at the millennium: A look back and look forward, Educational Psychologyist, Vol. 35, No. 4, 221-226.

Polovina, N. (2007): Sistemaska analiza saradnje kole i porodice; u N. Polovina i B. Bogunovi (prir.): Saradnja kole i porodice (91-113). Beograd: Institut za pedagoka istraivanja.

Polovina, N. (2007a): Family-school cooperation in the context of traumatic transitions in Serbian society; in H. Phtiaka & S. Symeonidou (eds.): Schools and families in part-nership: looking into the future (292-300). Cypros: University of Cypros.

Polovina, N. & J. Stanii (2007): A study on family-school cooperation based on an analysis of school documentation, Zbornik Instituta za pedagoka istraivanja, Vol. 39, br. 1, (115-133). Beograd: Institut za pedagoka istraivanja.

Puckering, C. (1997): Partnership with parents; in G. Zindovi-Vukadinovi, B. Trebjeanin & S. Krnjaji (eds.): Children in the times of social crisis (90-96). Belgrade: Institute for Educational Research.

Redding, S., Langdon, J., Mayer, J., & Sheley, P. (2004): The effects of comprehensive parent engagement on students learning outcomes. Paper presenting ar the annual meeting of the American Educational research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from the World Web Wide

http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/fine/resources/research/redding.html Scribner, A. P. & J. D. Scribner (2001): High performing schools serving Mexican-american

students: what they can teach us. ERIC Development team.Retrieved from World Wide Web www.eric.ed.gov

VanBalkam, V. D. i S. Mijatovi (2006): Uvod u unapreenje nastave i uenja kroz struno usavravanje; u V. D. VanBalkam i S. Mijatovi (ur.): Struno usavravanje: iskustva edukatora za edukatore (107-110). Kanadska agencija za meunarodni razvoj CIDA.

Voji-Markovi, M. (1996): Saradnja porodice i kole kao faktor socijalizacije linosti deteta, kola i porodica kao agensi socijalizacije linosti (183-189). Valjevo.

Dinovi, V., J. Pavlovi, i N. Miloevi (2007): Saradnja porodice i kole kao odnos meu-zavisnosti: kako roditelji konstruiu probleme; u N. Polovina, i B. Bogunovi (ur.): Sa-radnja kole i porodice (114-130). Beograd: Institut za pedagoka istraivanja.

Waden, N., Westat, K. (2006): Parents reports of school practices to provide information to families: 1996 and 2003. Statistic in brief/December 2005, National Center for Educati-onal Statistic/US Departement of education Institut for educational sciences.

10.03.2008; 26.04.2008.

170

Nada Polovina CONTRIBUTION OF SCHOOL TO BUILDING UP THE PARTNERSHIP

WITH PARENTS Abstract

This paper studies the way in which headmasters and class masters perceive and estimate the factors, obstacles and incentives to building up a partnership between school and parents. The sample consists of 60 headmasters and 305 class masters from 60 schools (37 urban and 23 rural) in Serbia. Headmasters and teachers filled in separate, but parallel questionnaires (modified only in the segment of different roles) that were created for the purposes of research. Questionnaire items inquire about the factors contributing to the inclusion of parents, the obstacles in developing the cooperation between parents and school and the peculiarities of school environment that can contribute to the development of that cooperation, as well as about the peculiarities of the communication with parents. Research findings indicate that headmasters and teachers assess the importance of different components in the field of cooperation with parents in a similar, but not identical way. Most similarities are found in the perception of obstacles for establishing cooperation (the problems of coordinating time periods for meetings, previous bad experiences of parents regarding cooperation). The majority of differences lie in perceiving the importance of cooperation factors (headmasters emphasise the parent factor, while teachers do so both for the parent factor and child factor), as well as in perceiving the necessary incentives for the improvement of cooperation between school and parents (headmasters emphasise the spatial-temporal organisation components, and teachers do so for spatial components and personal initiatives). In the assessments of both the headmasters and teachers we obtained differences marked by gender, the longitude of years of service, size of the settlement where the school is located (town-village). The general conclusion indicates that the topic of cooperation between school and parents is highly and in many ways context sensitive, and that the building of cooperation program must be preceded by the process of systemic and systematic dialogue shaping of the topic on the level of every individual school, in order to purify the existing multiverse meanings and thus provide foundation for clear, locally meaningful and sustainable cooperation programs. Key words: parental inclusion, teachers assessments, headmasters assessments, factors of cooperation between parents and school, obstacles to cooperation, incen-tives.

, - , . 60 305 60 (37 23 ).

171

, , - , - . , , - - , -, . , - . ( - , ). - ( -, ), ( - , - ). , , , , , ( - ). , - , - , -, , . : , , , , -, .