Upload
nancy-bishop
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3 It is essential to fully characterize N * and * to understand baryon structure. Many nucleon resonances predicted by quark model are still not observed. Some resonances could couple to K or K channel. Many one or two star resonances, above 1700 MeV (W > 1.7 GeV). Structures in SAPHIR / CLAS data were found, possibly connected with missing resonances like D 13 (1900). Need more complete K + data to reach the conclusion. K + ( 0 ) (p p N, N *, * Missing resonances N* and * in s-channel Polarization observables (Photon-beam asymmetry etc..) are sensitive to resonance states and model differences because of interference between states.
Citation preview
11
K+ Photoproduction and p0
photoproduction by Linearly Polarized Photons at SPring-8/LE
PS
Mizuki SumihamaMizuki SumihamaRCNP, Osaka Univ.RCNP, Osaka Univ.
for the LEPS collaborationfor the LEPS collaboration MENU2007 Sep. 2007
8 GeV ring
22
Diagram of KDiagram of K++ / / pp00 photoproduction photoproduction
K+ (p
pp
N, N*, *
K+ (p0)
pp
K, K*, K1)
K+ (p0)
(pp
, Y*(N,N*)
ss-channel tt-channel uu-channel
Intermediate angle forward angle backward angle
Spectrometer acceptance : 0.7<coscm <1
LEPS spectrometer covers the region where other facilities cannot access.
Forward data Forward data Detect K Detect K++, ID , ID 00 in missing mass in missing massBackward data Backward data Detect Detect (p(ppp, ID K, ID K++ in missing mass. in missing mass.
33
It is essential to fully characterize N* and * to understand baryon structure.
Many nucleon resonances predicted by quark model are still not observed.
Some resonances could couple to K or K channel.
Many one or two star resonances, above 1700 MeV (W > 1.7 GeV). Structures in SAPHIR / CLAS
data were found, possibly connected with missing resonances like D13(1900).
Need more complete K+ data to reach the conclusion.
K+ (p0)
(pp
N, N*, *
Missing resonances N* and Missing resonances N* and * in s-channel* in s-channel
Polarization observables (Photon-beam asymmetry etc..) are sensitive to resonance states and model differences because of interference between states.
44
Meson / hyperon exchange in Meson / hyperon exchange in t- /t- / uu-channel-channel
K+
p
K*, K, K1
LEPS energy E = 1.5 - 2.4 GeV is in the transition region,
s-channel t-channel (forward), u-channel (backward) Photon-beam asymmetry at t = 0
and large E: natural parity exchange (K*) = + 1
unnatural parity exchange (K, K1) = - 1
gpKY coupling constant in the u-channel.
Studies of coupled-channel analysis
show non-negligible effect.
K+
p
, Y*
55
Laser-electron photon beamLaser-electron photon beam Linearly polarized photon beam.Linearly polarized photon beam. photon beam asymmetry.photon beam asymmetry. Polarization degree is 95% (55%) at the maximum (minimum) Polarization degree is 95% (55%) at the maximum (minimum)
energy. energy. Use horizontally ( ) and vertically ( ) polarized beam. Use horizontally ( ) and vertically ( ) polarized beam. Energy 1.5 – 2.4 GeV, RMS=15 MeV.Energy 1.5 – 2.4 GeV, RMS=15 MeV. Intensity 1x10Intensity 1x1066 cps. cps.
Forward data Forward data Detect K Detect K+ + ((pp), ID ), ID 00 ( (pp) in missing mass) in missing massBackward data Backward data Detect Detect (p(ppp, ID K, ID K++ in missing mass. in missing mass.
Forward spectrometerForward spectrometer
66
LEPS spectrometer – forward acceptanceLEPS spectrometer – forward acceptance
1m
TOFwall
MWDC 2
MWDC 3MWDC 1
Dipole Magnet (0.7 T)
Liquid HydrogenTarget (50 mm thick)
Start counter
Silicon VertexDetector
AerogelCherenkov
(n=1.03)
Linearly polarized
77
Particle identificationParticle identification by time-of-flight and momentum measurements
Detect K+ at forward angles, ID 0 in missing massDetect ppat forward angles, ID K+ in missing mass.
88
Forward KForward K++ photoproduction photoproduction
K+
K+ missing mass spectrum
99
Energy distribution Energy distribution of differential cross sectionsof differential cross sections
W (GeV)
Resonance-like structure
W (GeV)
K+K*-exchange by M. Guidal (Regge model).Isobar + Regge by T. Mart and C. Bennhold. Gent isobar model by T. Corthals
LEPS SAPHIR CLAS
0(1193)(1116)
1010
Angular distribution Angular distribution of differential cross sectionsof differential cross sections
No forward peaking.
0(1193)(1116)
Forward peaking Need Regge poles.
Regge model K+K*-exchangeIsobar (Feynman) only Isobar + Regge by T.Mart and C.Bennhold.
LEPS CLAS
1111
Photon-beam asymmetry Photon-beam asymmetry -single polarization observable-single polarization observable
K+K*-exchange by M. Guidal.Isobar + Regge by T. Mart and C. Bennhold. Gent isobar model by T. Corthals
Some resonances are hidden by other resonances due to their wide widths in cross sections. Polarization observables are a good mean to extract such hidden states.
0(1193)(1116)
1212
Still large variation of models Still large variation of models at backward anglesat backward angles
T. Mart and A. SulaksonoPRC74 (2006) 055203
SAPHIR/LEPS
CLAS/LEPS
SAPHIR/CLAS/LEPS
Used data for fitting in models.
Photon asymmetry
1313
Backward KBackward K++ photoproduction photoproduction
M(pp-)
(1116)
p XK+
p p pp K+, K*, KY*
Detect (pp-) at forward spectrometerIdentify K+ by missing mass technique
1414
Backward KBackward K++ photoproduction photoproductionnucl-ex/ arXiv:0707.4412, K.Hicks, T.Mibe, M.Sumihama, et al.
Curves are theoretical calculation using and * u-channel poles.
1515
Complementary with CLAS dataComplementary with CLAS data
LEPS
CLAS
1616
Photon asymmetry at backward anglesPhoton asymmetry at backward angles
1.5 GeV < E < 2.0 GeV
2.0 GeV < E < 2.4 GeV
p K+
•Experiment with time- projection chamber will start soon. Photon asymmetry at medium region will be measured.
New data at backward angles give constraints to theoretical models.
1717
Backward Backward pp00 photoproduction photoproduction
17
1/10 total statistics
proton missing mass spectrum
M. Sumihama et. al, nucl-ex/0708.1600
1818
Differential cross sectionDifferential cross section coscoscmcm
•Change angular distribution at E~1.8 GeV1.8 GeV, •Backward peakingBackward peaking
Existing data. LEPS data
uu-channel contribution
SAID MAID2005
191919
Energy dependence of slope Energy dependence of slope in differential cross sectionsin differential cross sections
s-7 : quark counting rule
sqrt(s) (GeV)
202020
Photon beam asymmetryPhoton beam asymmetry
SAID LEPS data Existing data. PLB544(2002)113 NPB104(1976)253…
MAID2005
•Strong angular dependence above 1.9 GeV1.9 GeV.•Higher mass resonances need to be included.
Positive sign: Negative sign:
2121
SummarySummary Photon-beam asymmetry and differential cross sections were Photon-beam asymmetry and differential cross sections were
obtained at very forward angles, and backward angles.obtained at very forward angles, and backward angles. Bump structure was seen around W=1960 MeV in the Bump structure was seen around W=1960 MeV in the
KK++mode as well as the CLAS/SAPHIR data. mode as well as the CLAS/SAPHIR data. At forward angles, we observed a forward peaking in KAt forward angles, we observed a forward peaking in K++ but but
no peaking in Kno peaking in K++00. . Photon asymmetry data provide further constraints for models. Photon asymmetry data provide further constraints for models.
Backward peaking is due to u-channel dominance.Backward peaking is due to u-channel dominance. Strong angular dependence of asymmetry reflects the Strong angular dependence of asymmetry reflects the
contribution of higher-mass resonances at Econtribution of higher-mass resonances at E > 1.9 GeV. > 1.9 GeV.
p0 photoproduction
+ photoproduction
2222
LEPS collaborationD.S. Ahn, J.K. Ahn, H. Akimune, Y. Asano, W.C. Chang, S. Date, H. Ejiri, H. Fujimura, M. Fujiwara, K. Hicks, K. Horie, T. Hotta, K. Imai, T. Ishikawa, T. Iwata, Y.Kato, H. Kawai,
Z.Y. Kim, K. Kino, H. Kohri, N. Kumagai, Y.Maeda, S. Makino, T. Matsumura, N. Matsuoka, T. Mibe, M. Miyabe, Y. Miyachi, M. Morita, N. Muramatsu, T. Nakano, Y. Nakatsugawa, M. Niiyama, M. Nomachi, Y. Ohashi, T. Ooba, H. Ookuma, D. S. Oshuev, C. Rangacharyulu, A. Sakaguchi, T. Sasaki, T. Sawada, P. M. Shagin, Y. Shiino, H. Shimizu, S. Shimizu, Y. Sugaya, M. Sumihama H. Toyokawa, A. Wakai, C.W. Wang, S.C. Wang, K. Yonehara, T. Yorita, M.
Yosoi and R.G.T. Zegers, a Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan
b Department of Physics, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, Koreac Department of Physics, Konan University, Kobe, Hyogo 658-8501, Japan
d Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Mikazuki, Hyogo 679-5148, Japane Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
f Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Mikazuki, Hyogo 679-5198, Japanh School of physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747 Koreai Department of Physics, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA
j Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japank Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 982-0826, Japan
l Department of Physics, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Yamagata 990-8560, Japanm Department of Physics, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
n Wakayama Medical College, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-0012, Japano Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
p Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japanq Department of Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5E2, Canada
r Department of Applied Physics, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan