14
1 Page 1 Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) California Institute for Energy & Environment (CIEE) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Bill Tschudi Dale Sartor http://hightech.lbl.gov High-Performance High-Tech Buildings Project Laboratories, Cleanrooms, and Data Centers August 4, 2005

1 Page 1 Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) California Institute for Energy & Environment (CIEE) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Bill Tschudi

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Page 1

Public Interest Energy Research (PIER)California Institute for Energy & Environment (CIEE)

Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBill TschudiDale Sartor

http://hightech.lbl.gov

High-Performance High-Tech Buildings Project Laboratories, Cleanrooms, and Data Centers

August 4, 2005

22

California energy research related to data centers

Energy research roadmap Case studies and energy benchmarking Best practice identification Self benchmarking protocol Investigate efficiency of IT power supplies Investigate efficiency of UPS systems Metrics for computing performance vs.

energy Technology transfer Demonstration projects

33

Efficiency Ideas

Many areas for potential efficiency improvement are suggested in the research roadmap – available here:

http://datacenters.lbl.gov/docs/RoadmapFinal.pdf

4

Benchmarking and Best Practices identification

• Research-directed benchmarking• Self-benchmarking protocol• Summary of best practices observed

Improve uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)

Develop performance metrics

Improve power supplies in IT equipment

4

Current PIER data center & IT equipment activities

55

Preliminary findings: Infrastructure is typically oversized by

factors of 4 or more for today’s loads Heat intensity is rising however computing

capability is rising faster There is wide variation in intensity and

efficiency Well studied efficiency measures (chilled

water optimization, lighting controls, etc.) are not implemented

Controversy over use of some technologies Industry is concerned – but more for ability

to cool rising heat intensity – not efficiency

6

LBNL scoped 15 potential demonstrations

5 demonstrations were selected including DC powering rack of computers

6

High-tech demonstration projects

7

DC Power Demonstration Project Team

7

LBNL• Bill Tschudi (PI)• Dale Sartor• Evan Mills• Steve

Greenberg

Subcontractors• Ecos Consulting/EPRI

Solutions (Power Supply and UPS evaluations)

Industry partners • EYP Mission Critical Facilities (Data center

benchmarking data collection)• TBD - Cost sharing required

8

DC powering rack of computers (why we are here)

Design process – issues in planning a supercomputer center

One year schedule

8

New additions to the project:

9

Wide range of efficiencies:

0102030405060708090

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Facility Identifier

W/S

q.F

t.

Current Computer Load Projected Computer Load

Average 39.3

Average ~25

HVAC (as a % of total load)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Data Center Identifier

% o

f to

tal l

oad

9

HVAC effectiveness varies

Watt

s/sf

10

The opportunity: power conversionThe loss in electrical power through conversion of AC to DC to AC to DC occurs for all power flowing to the IT equipment.

10

Internal Drive

External Drive

I/O

Memory Controller

Processor

SDRAM

Graphics Controller

DC/DCAC/DC

DC/DC

AC/DC Multi output PS

Voltage Regulator Modules

5V

12V

3.3V

12V 1.5/2.5V

1.1V-1.85V

3.3V

3.3V

12V

PWM/PFCSwitcher

Unregulated DCTo Multi Output Regulated DC

Voltages

Internal Drive

External Drive

I/O

Memory Controller

Processor

SDRAM

Graphics Controller

DC/DCAC/DC

DC/DC

AC/DC Multi output PS

Voltage Regulator Modules

5V

12V

3.3V

12V 1.5/2.5V

1.1V-1.85V

3.3V

3.3V

12V

PWM/PFCSwitcher

Unregulated DCTo Multi Output Regulated DC

Voltages

Inverter

In Out

Bypass

Battery/ChargerRectifier

Inverter

In Out

Bypass

Battery/ChargerRectifier

Efficiency gains have a magnifying effect by reducing need for HVAC (e.g. 10% saving at the UPS level could mean 20% saving for the datacenter)

1111

Double conversion efficiency ranged from 86% to 97% at peak load, but efficiency under typical operating loads ranges from 81% to 93%

UPS measured efficiency

Typical operating range 30-50%

Factory Measurements of UPS Efficiency

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Rated Active Power Load

Eff

icie

nc

y

Flywheel UPS

Double-Conversion UPS

Line-Interactive, DeltaConversion UPS

(tested using linear loads)

12

Power Supply Findings:

12

Typical operating range is 30%-50% to provide redundancy

20% variation in worst to best

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% of Nameplate Power Output

% E

ffic

ien

cy

Average of All Servers

1313

Today’s goal:

Help us define demonstration project

Identify Industry partner roles and resources

Identify barriers and plans to overcome them

Clear action plan

1414

Bill Tschudi

[email protected]

510-495-2417

http://hightech.lbl.gov