10.1080@13854049708400471

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 10.1080@13854049708400471

    1/7

    This article was downloaded by: [Loyola University Libraries]On: 08 October 2013, At: 05:48Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

    The Clinical NeuropsychologistPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ntcn20

    Spanish boston naming test normsRicardo F. Allegri

    ab, Aurora Fernandez Villavicencio

    a,

    Fernando E. Taraganoa, Sandra Rymberg

    b, Carlos A. Mangone

    c

    & Denise Baumannc

    a

    Servicio de Neuropsicologa (SIREN) , CEMIC, Buenos Aires,Servicios de Neurologa ,bHospital Municipal Zubizarreta ,

    cHospital Municipal Santojanni , Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Published online: 08 Nov 2007.

    To cite this article:Ricardo F. Allegri , Aurora Fernandez Villavicencio , Fernando E. Taragano ,Sandra Rymberg , Carlos A. Mangone & Denise Baumann (1997) Spanish boston namingtest norms,The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11:4, 416-420, DOI: 10.1080/13854049708400471

    To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854049708400471

    PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

    Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (theContent) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.

    This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,

    systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms

    http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/13854049708400471http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ntcn20http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854049708400471http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/13854049708400471http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ntcn20
  • 8/10/2019 10.1080@13854049708400471

    2/7

    & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

    http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
  • 8/10/2019 10.1080@13854049708400471

    3/7

    The Clinical Neuropsychologist

    1997, Vol. 11, NO. 4, pp. 41 6-420

    1385-4046/97/

    I

    104-416 12.00

    wets & Zeitlinger

    Spanish

    Boston Nam ing Test Norm s*

    Ricardo

    F.

    Allegri Carlos A. Ma ngone3 Aurora Fernandez Villavicencio, Sandra Rymberg,

    Fernando

    E.

    Taragano, and Denise Baumann3

    Servic io de N europsicologia (SIREN), C EM IC, Buenos A ires, Servicios d e Neurologia, 2Hospital Municipal

    Zubizarreta, an d 3Hospital Mun icipal Santojanni, Bu enos Aires, Argentina

    ABSTRACT

    The Spanish version

    of

    the Boston Nam ing Test (BNT) has enjoyed widespread use in many clinical and

    research studies since its introduction. How ever, there are no normative data available for this test, and the

    original English language order

    of

    presentation is maintained. The purpose of this study was to collect

    normative information in B uenos A ires and to evaluate age and education effects for the BNT. We studied

    200 independent healthy controls between 30 and

    82

    years of age. No sub jects had any history of neurolog-

    ical or psychiatric disorders

    or

    alcohol abuse. Neuropsychological evaluation included the Mini-Mental

    State Examination, Signoret Memory Battery, Serial Frontal Test, Phonologic and Semantic Fluency Test,

    and Hamilton Depression Scale. Th e Spanish version of the Boston Nam ing Test was administered accord-

    ing to the standard protocol. We observed that naming ab ilities remain generally intact throughout advanc-

    ing age. Results on the BNT were significantly correlated with education

    @ 70 Total

    Education (years)

    Elementary (less than 7) 8 9 15 21 8 61

    High school

    8

    to

    12)

    18 14

    13 17

    7

    69

    College (m ore than

    13) 18

    10

    22 10 10 70

    Total 44 33 50 48 24 200

    The

    60

    stimulus figures are presented in order of

    increasing difficulty. Th e Spanish version (Kap-

    lan, Goodglass ,

    &

    Weintraub, 1986) is used fre-

    quently in Argen tina.The test maintains the or-

    der of presentation of the figures of the original

    English language test. We believe that this

    cause s som e difficulties in clinical practice an d

    research with Spanish-speaking populations.

    Indeed, i t cannot be assumed that the Spanish

    and English language s possess equivalent word

    frequencies. It is important to note that even

    though no Spanish language norms exis t , the tes t

    is widely used i n clinical se ttings and comm er-

    cially distributed

    in

    Argentina.

    The purpose of this study was to generate

    normative information for the BN T in Buenos

    Aires, and to re-order the stimulus cards to

    reflect the frequency of correct responses. We

    included a wide range of age and educat ion

    levels.

    M AT E R IAL S AND M E T HOD S

    Two hundred normal, non-institutionalized, inde-

    pendent subjects, between 30 and 82 years of age

    were evaluated. The se were relatives or caregivers

    of neurological patients from our clinical depart-

    ments.

    All subjects were administered th e Mini-Mental

    State Examination (Folstein, Folstein,

    &

    McHugh,

    1975), Signorets Memory Evaluation Battery

    (Signoret,

    &

    Whiteley,

    1979),

    the Serial Frontal

    Test (Luria, 1966), the Verbal Semantic and Pho-

    nologic Fluency Test (Benton,

    1968),

    he Hamilton

    Depression Sca le (Hamilton, 1960)and the Boston

    Naming Test (BNT) (Kaplan, Goodglass ,

    &

    Weintraub,

    1986).

    The BN T was administered and

    scored following the procedures recommended by

    the original authors (Kaplan, Goodglass ,

    &

    Weintraub, 1983). Subjects with a history of neu-

    rologic andl or psychiatric illness, alcoholism, or

    Mini-Mental State scores (MMS) lower than 26

    (Folstein, Folstein,

    &

    McHugh,

    1975)

    were ex-

    cluded,

    as

    well as those scoring lower than two

    standard deviations from the m ean in the remain-

    der of the cognitive tests. Illiterates were not in-

    cluded.

    Data Analysis

    Spearman correlation coefficient and ANOVA

    were used, (BM DP

    90

    Statistical Software, Dixon,

    1990)

    Table

    2.

    Results of the Boston Naming Test on Normal Subjec ts Stratified by Age and Education.

    Age (years)

    70

    Total

    M S D )

    M S D )

    M S D ) M S D )

    M S D ) M S D )

    ~~

    Education (years)

    Elementary (less than

    7) 47.7

    7.0)

    49.0 3.7) 49.4 4.2) 47.8 5.4) 45.8 4.0) 48.1

    5.0)

    High school

    8

    to

    12) 51.1

    3.8) 54.2 3.6)

    52.8 2.2) 51.8

    4.2) 50.7 (5.1) 52.2 3.9)

    College (m ore than

    13) 54.9 2.3)

    55.5

    1.4)

    55.0

    3.8) 53.0 3.4) 52.8

    (1.3)

    54.2 3.1)

    Total 52.0 4.8) 53.4 4.0) 52.8 4.2) 50.2 4.9) 50.1 4.5) 51.7 4.7)

  • 8/10/2019 10.1080@13854049708400471

    5/7

    418

    RICARDO ALLEGRI ET AL.

    Table 3. Percenta e

    o

    Correct Answers for Each

    Item

    o f

    (8riginal

    BNT.

    Table 4. Correct Order of Presentation of Items for

    Buenos Aires.

    Object correct

    Object correct

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    31

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

    37

    38

    39

    40

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    46

    47

    48

    49

    50

    51

    52

    53

    54

    55

    56

    57

    58

    59

    60

    Cama (Bed)

    Arbol (Tree)

    Lkpiz (Pencil)

    Casa (House)

    Reloj (Watch)

    Tijera (Scissors)

    Peine (Comb)

    Flor (Flower)

    Martillo (Ham mer)

    Sacapunta (Pencil sharpener)

    Helic6ptero (Helicopter)

    Escoba (Broom)

    Zanahoria (Zarrot)

    Percha (Perch)

    Termdmetro (Thermometer)

    Camello (Camel)

    Miscara (Mask)

    Helado (Ice cream)

    Banco (Bench)

    Raqueta (Racket)

    Caracol (Snail)

    Volcan (Volcano)

    Pez espada (Sword fish)

    Dardo (Dart)

    Canoa (Canoe)

    Globo (Globe)

    Corona (Crown)

    Castor (Beaver)

    Arm6nica (Harmonica)

    Rinoceronte (Rhinoceros)

    Bellota (Acorn)

    Domind (Dominoes)

    Cactus (Cactus)

    Escalera (Stairway)

    & % ~ ~ ~ ~ m m o c)

    Cerradura (Lock)

    Pelicano (Pelican)

    Estetoscopio (Stethoscope)

    Pirhmide (Pyramid)

    Bozal (Muzzle)

    Unicornio (Unicorn)

    Embudo (Funnel)

    Acorde6n (Accordion)

    Aguja (Needle)

    Esparrago (Asparagus)

    Com pis (Com ass)

    Chupete (Paciler)

    Tripode (Tri od)

    Pergamino (Farchment)

    Pinza (Tweezers)

    Esfinge (Sphinx)

    Yugo (Yoke)

    Regadera (W atering can)

    Paleta (Palette)

    Transportador (Protractor)

    Abaco (Abacus)

    Pulpo (Octo us)

    I lU(Iglo0)

    ncos (Stilts)

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    1

    100

    100

    100

    100

    I00

    97.7

    98.8

    98.2

    98.8

    99.4

    99.4

    98.2

    90.7

    99.4

    99.4

    98.8

    99.4

    98.2

    81

    97.1

    83.2

    100

    70.5

    75.7

    89.6

    55

    89.6

    96

    86.2

    95.4

    99.4

    98.2

    92.5

    90.7

    83.2

    78

    99.4

    91.3

    75.7

    97.1

    98.8

    92

    78.7

    96

    99.4

    86.7

    84.4

    94.8

    77.4

    34.2

    100

    87.7

    74

    88.5

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    31

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

    37

    38

    39

    40

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    46

    47

    48

    49

    50

    51

    52

    53

    54

    55

    56

    57

    58

    59

    60

    Cama (Bed)

    Arbol (Tree)

    LA iz (Pencil)

    Refoj (Watch)

    Tijera (Scissors)

    Peine (Comb)

    Flor (Flower)

    Martillo (Hammer)

    Escoba (Broom)

    Zanahoria (Carrot)

    Percha (Perch)

    Corona (Crown)

    Regadera (Watering can)

    Termdmetro (Thermometer)

    Camello (Camel)

    Banco (Bench)

    Raqueta (Racket)

    Volckn (Volcano)

    Escalera (Stairway)

    Pirimid e (Pyramid)

    Chupete (Pacifier)

    Sacapunta (Pencil sharpener)

    Caracol (Snail)

    Acorde6n (Accordion)

    Helic6ptero (Helicopter)

    Misc ara (Mask)

    Pez es ada (Sword

    fish)

    Casa (House)

    Canoa (Canoe)

    Embudo (Funnel)

    Zancos (Stilts)

    Compis (Compass)

    Cactus (Cactus)

    Pinzas (Tweezers)

    Hamaca (Hammock)

    Aguja (Needle)

    Bozal (Muzzle)

    Helado (Ice cream)

    Cerradura (Lock)

    Rinoceronte (Rhinoceros)

    Abaco (Abacus)

    Paleta (Palette)

    Tripode (Tripod)

    Domin6 (Dominoes)

    Per amino (Parchment)

    Glo%o (Glob e)

    Pelicano (Pelican)

    Dardo (Dart)

    Espkrrago (As aragus)

    Estetosco io (hetho scop e)

    EsfinFe (lphinx)

    Armonica (Harmonica)

    Unicornio (Unicorn)

    Transportador (Protractor)

    Castor (Beaver)

    Bellota (Acorn)

    Yugo (Yoke

    )

    Pulpo (Octopus)

    Arpa Rarp)

    Ig16 (Igloo)

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    100

    I00

    100

    100

    I00

    100

    99.4

    99.4

    99.4

    99.4

    99.4

    99.4

    99.4

    99.4

    99.8

    99.8

    99.8

    99.8

    98.2

    98.2

    98.2

    98.2

    97.7

    97.1

    97.1

    96

    96

    95.4

    94.8

    92.5

    92

    91.3

    90.7

    90.7

    89.6

    89.6

    88.5

    87.7

    86.7

    86.2

    84.4

    83.2

    83.2

    81

    78.7

    78

    77.4

    75.7

    75.7

    74

    70.5

    55

    34.2

    Note.

    N=200.

  • 8/10/2019 10.1080@13854049708400471

    6/7

    SPANISH BNT NORMS 419

    Table 5.

    Boston

    NamingTest Results Stratified by Education.

    Education

    (years)

    Elementary (less than

    7)

    48.1

    (5.1)

    High

    school

    (8

    to

    12)

    52.2(3.9)

    College (more

    than 13)

    54.2(3.1)

    Note. Cut off= limit value at two standard deviations below mean.

    RESULTS

    Age and education distribution of the population

    are shown in Table

    1.

    Correlation between BNT

    scores, age, and education showed that only edu-

    cation correlated significantly with naming test

    scores r=

    .52; p