11b Form Desk Evaluation Proposal Skripsi_r130314_Maret2014

Fakultas FarmasiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

AREA AKTIVITAS AKADEMIK (AA)

Tanggal Berlaku : 1 Januari 2012Tanggal Revisi : R1Versi : V0

Kode Dokumen : FM-UMS-AA-FPU-PPK-13/R1

Fungsi Perkuliahan dan Ujian (FPU)

No. : /BS-B/FF-UMS/…..Lamp : 1 bendelHal : Permohonan Desk Evaluation

Kepada

Yth. Reviewer : …………………………………………………………………………….

Di Tempat

Dengan hormat,

Sehubungan dengan akan diadakannya Desk Evaluation atas proposal mahasiswa

berikut :

Nama : …………………………………………………………………………….

NIM : …………………………………………………………………………….

No HP : …………………………………………………………………………….

Judul :

Maka kami mengharapkan kesediaan Bapak/Ibu untuk mereview pada :

Hari : …………………………………………………………………………….

Tanggal : …………………………………………………………………………….

Jam : …………………………………………………………………………….

Tempat : …………………………………………………………………………….

Demikian undangan ini kami sampaikan, atas perhatiannya kami ucapkan terima kasih.

Surakarta, …...………………...,..… Sekretaris Program S-1Fakultas Farmasi UMS

(…………………………………….)

Biro Skripsi FF UMS Desk Evaluation

REVIEWER

http://images.google.co.id/imgres?imgurl=http://www.ums.ac.id/files/logo.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.ums.ac.id/fki.html&usg=__mtmZlR74kc9hy08budT0otYqBTE=&h=88&w=90&sz=4&hl=id&start=3&tbnid=5OTi2biRz3Fw3M:&tbnh=76&tbnw=78&prev=/images?q=Logo+UMS&gbv=2&hl=id&sa=G






FORMULIR PENILAIAN USULAN SKRIPSI*

Judul Penelitian : ......................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

Nama Mahasiswa : ......................................................................................................

NIM : ......................................................................................................

Pembimbing 1 : ......................................................................................................

Pembimbing 2 : ......................................................................................................

Reviewer : ......................................................................................................

Diterima reviewer hari/tgl : ......................................................................................................

A. Komentar Umum:

1. Fisibilitas (Ketersediaan Bahan dan Alat) dan Jadwal penelitian

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

2. Ketepatan Format

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

3. Bahasa (Kebakuan, keruntutan, kejelasan)

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

B. Komentar Khusus dan Saran Untuk Perbaikan

1. Judul (efektivitas, spesifikasi, dan kejelasan judul)


REVIEWER







..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

2. Latar belakang (kesesuaian alasan pentingnya penelitian dengan rumusan masalah)..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

3. Kejelasan dan ketajaman rumusan masalah serta tujuan

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

4. Tinjauan pustaka (relevansi, kemutakhiran pustaka, dan pemanfaatan jurnal ilmiah serta ketepatan teori yang digunakan)..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

5. Metode (ketepatan, kedetailan/kerincian dan kejelasan)

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

6. Daftar pustaka (kesesuaian, relevansi dan konsistensi format)

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................

Selesai direview pada hari/tanggal : ......................., 20.....

Reviewer,








(..............................................)

*dikembalikan ke mahasiswa

BERITA ACARA DESK EVALUATION

Telah diselenggarakan Desk Evaluation pada :

Hari/tanggal : …………………………………………………………………………….

Waktu : …………………………………………………………………………….

Tempat : …………………………………………………………………………….

Nama mhs : …………………………………………………………………………….

NIM : …………………………………………………………………………….

Judul penelitian :

Berdasarkan hasil desk evaluation, proposal mahasiswa tersebut dinyatakan :

layak / tidak layak*

dengan nilai akhir :……………………….

Dan mendapatkan nilai METODOLOGI PENELITIAN =

Angka = …………………….

Huruf = ……………………………

Hal-hal penting yang perlu dicatat dalam berita acara ini review berlangsung :

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Surakarta, ...................20......

1. Reviewer : ………………………….. ………………

* Coret salah satu

Mengetahui,








Sekretaris Program S-1 Mahasiswa

(…………………………) (…………………………)

SKORING PENILAIAN USULAN SKRIPSI**

Judul Penelitian : ......................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

......................................................................................................

Nama Mahasiswa : ......................................................................................................

NIM : ......................................................................................................

Pembimbing 1 : ......................................................................................................

Pembimbing 2 : ......................................................................................................

Komponen Nilai maksimal

Nilai

A. Umum1. Aktualitas 52. Orisinalitas 53. Fisibilitas 54. Ketepatan format dan bahasa 5

B. Latar belakang/Pendahuluan1. Ketajaman rumusan masalah 152. Kesesuaian alasan pentingnya penelitian dengan

rumusan masalah10

3. Kejelasan tujuan 10C. Tinjauan pustaka

1. Relevansi 52. Kemutakhiran dan keaslian sumber 53. Ketepatan teori yang digunakan 5

D Metode Penelitian1. Kesesuaian dengan masalah 102. Ketepatan rancangan dan instrumen 103. Kejelasan metode 10

JUMLAH NILAI

Nilai Akhir Nilai Huruf77 Nilai 100 A

70 Nilai 76,99 AB63 Nilai 69,99 B56 Nilai 62,99 BC50 Nilai 55,99 C

49,99 TIDAK LULUS


REVIEWER/PEMBIMBING

RANGKAP 2







Surakarta, ...................., 20….

Pembimbing/Reviewer

(…………………………..)

**dikembalikan ke Biro Skripsi








SURAT KETERANGAN SELESAI MELAKSANAKAN REVISIDESK EVALUATION

Kami yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa dengan

Nama : ………………………………………………………………………………...

NIM :

………………………………………………………………………………...

dalam proposal Skripsi yang berjudul :

telah selesai melaksanakan revisi Desk Evaluation

Demikian pernyataan ini kami buat, untuk dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya.

Surakarta, ………………………..

1

. ……………………………………………… ………………...

2

. ……………………………………………… ………………...

3

. ……………………………………………… ………………...

Mengetahui,

Sekretaris Program S-1

(………………………………….).








HONOR DESK EVALUATION**

Hari/tanggal :

………………………………………………………………………………...

Nama mahasiswa :

………………………………………………………………………………...

NIM :

………………………………………………………………………………...

Judul penelitian :

No. Nama Jabatan Honor Tanda tangan

1. Reviewer Rp.

Jumlah : Rp.

Surakarta, .....................................,...............

a.n. Dekan,

Wakil Dekan II

(………………………………………….)








**dikembalikan ke Biro Skripsi

Kepada

Yth. Sekretaris Program S1

Fakultas Farmasi UMS

Di tempat

Dengan ini menerangkan bahwa mahasiswa :

Nama : ………………………………………………………………………………...

NIM : ………………………………………………………………………………...

Judul : ………………………………………………………………………………...

Telah menyerahkan soft copy proposal penelitian yang berisi :

a. Pindaian halaman pengesahan yang ditandatangani pembimbing dan reviewer

b. Naskah proposal

c. Pindaian komentar desk evaluation dari reviewer

Pembimbing I Pembimbing II

(…………………………) (…………………………)

Perpustakaan FF UMS


RANGKAP 2







(…………………………)



Documents

11b Form Desk Evaluation Proposal Skripsi_r130314_Maret2014