2 Guelhan Instrumentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    1/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    1 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    CHALLENGES OF THE INSTRUMENTATIONFOR HIGH SPEED ENTRY VEHICLES

    Ali Glhan, Thomas Thiele, Frank SiebeGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)

    Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    2/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    2 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    CHALLENGES OF THE INSTRUMENTATIONFOR HIGH SPEED ENTRY VEHICLES

    Outline

    Introduction

    Instrumentation of SHEFEX-I Flight Experiment

    Instrumentation of SHEFEX-II Flight Experiment

    Instrumentation of the Flaps of the ESA FlightExperiment EXPERT

    Proposed Instrumentation for the Exomars DemonstatorBack Cover

    Concluding Remarks

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    3/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    3 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Introduction

    Ground testing facilities and CFD codes have shortcomings to

    simulate the flight parameters fully. Therefore flight experiments

    are essential for the development of future spacecrafts.

    Hypersonic flight testing is costly and risky. It does not allow to

    perform parameter study, i.e. difficult to use for the validation of

    physical modelling and CFD codes.

    Therefore hypersonic experiments have to be performed with themaximum possible instrumentation.

    Coupled simulations with Fluid-Structure-Interaction showed that in

    most cases the temperature peaks computed with radiativeequilibrium assumption, are less pronounced. Validation

    experiments provided the same results.

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    4/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    4 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    SHEFEX-I Payload

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    5/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    5 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Vehicle based on existing components Instable re-entry behaviour

    Vehicle based on new / modified Components

    Stable re-entry behaviour

    Imp. OrionS30

    SHEFEX Basic Vehicle Configuration / Actual Vehicle Configuration

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    6/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    7 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Max. Downrange ~ 250km

    3

    Impact Radius ~ 60km

    Andya Rocket Range

    Impact andMarit ime Recovery

    SHEFEX Launch Site Andya Rocket Range, Norway

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    7/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    8 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Flying windtunnel for

    getting real flight data

    Test bed for different TPS

    concepts and materials

    Aerodynamic and structural

    verification of advanced

    outer shapes

    SHEFEX Sharp Edge Flight Experiment

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    8/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    9 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    time [s]

    altitude[km]

    velocit

    y[km/s]

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    SHEFEX Flight Trajectory

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    9/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    10 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    flight time [s]

    pressure[mbar]

    428 430 432 434 436 438 440 442 444 446 448

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    Pres-1 (P5-h)

    Pres-2 (P8-h)

    Pres-3 (P13-v)

    Pres-4 (P13-m)

    Pres-5 (P13-h)

    Pres-6 (P22-v)

    Pres-7 (P22-m)

    Pres-8 (P22-h)

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    10/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    11 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    flight time [s]

    heatflux

    rate[kW/m

    2]

    420 425 430 435 440 445

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    HFS-1 (P5-h)

    HFS-2 (P13-h)

    HFS-3 (P22-v)

    HFS-4 (P22-m)

    HFS-5 (P22-h)

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    11/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    12 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    flight time [s]

    temp

    erature[K]

    410 420 430 440

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    Ts-2 (P1-v)

    TK-01 (P5-m)

    TK-02 (P5-h)Tk-14 (P13-v)

    Tk-15 (P13-m)

    Tk-16 (P13-h)

    Tk-28 (P22-v)

    Tk-29 (P22-m)Tk-30 (P22-h)

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    12/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    13 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Post fl ight analysis

    Experiments on steps and gaps effects in L3K

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    13/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    14 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    SHEFEX-II Instrumentation

    Increase of re-entry velocity from Ma 6.5 up to Ma 11

    Increase of experiment duration from 20 s to 45 s

    Temperatures, pressure, heat flux measurements also

    during ascentIncrease number of sensors (from 60 to 140)

    Flush Air Data System (FADS)

    SHEFEX I => SHEFEX II

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    14/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    15 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Instrumentation of the SHEFEX II flight experiment

    Two cameras are installed between the stabiliser fins (one on each side) looking forward.

    They are integrated in separate small fins with surrounding high temperature insulation.

    Quartz windows with 5mm thickness are used for the optical access.

    The cameras use a CCD chip with 752x582 pixel resolution. The video signal is stored in

    the on-board system or transmitted real-time to the ground station.

    Camera interfaceCeramic nose with attachedpressure tubing

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    15/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    17 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    TPS Sensor Interfaces for SHEFEX II

    TPS C/C-SiC ti le

    Combined heat-flux / pressure port

    Interface for heat flux sensor also contains a pressureport leading to a reduction of the number of

    necessary TPS interfaces.

    Interface manufactured from high-temperature steel.

    TPS interface is spring-loaded to compensate for

    thermal expansion in axial direction.

    Pressure transducer located internally is connected via

    metallic tubing.

    SHEFEX II

    forebody

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    16/32IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    18 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Thermal analysis for the SHEFEX II TPS interfaces

    The verification of the TPS interfaces concerning temperature resistance was done bystructural analysis.

    Input heat flux from CFD

    Pressure port / Heat flux sensor maximum temperatures

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    650,00 660,00 670,00 680,00 690,00 700,00

    Flight time [s ]

    Tempera

    ture

    [C]

    C/C-SiC tile Bushing Spring HFM Sensor

    Temperature

    distribution at

    end of experiment

    time

    Temperature vs

    flight time for

    different

    interface parts

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    17/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    19 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    EXPERT High Temperature Pressure Ports

    A pressure measurement at the control surfaces (flaps) of the EXPERT vehicle is verychallenging due to very high temperatures at the flaps (2000 K) during re-entry.

    A spring loaded ceramic pressure port was designed and qualified at DLR Cologne which is

    able to withstand the thermal environment at the EXPERT flaps.

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    18/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    20 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    EXPERT High Temperature Pressure Ports

    Tconst=

    300K

    Heat

    flux 2

    Heat flux 1

    Qualification of the pressure port design was done by structural analysis and windtunnel testing.

    The numerical simulation was performed with heat flux values from worst-case CFD

    computations (peak heat flux 1.3 MW/m2) using the windtunnel setup for the structural model.

    All computations show that the limit temperatures for the

    different materials were not exceeded.

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    19/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    21 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    EXPERT High Temperature Pressure Ports

    Windtunnel tests for the pressure port qualification were performed in the arc-heated facility L3Kat DLR Cologne. The temperature distribution was monitored with thermocouples, pyrometers

    and an infrared camera.

    Despite oxidation of the metallic parts the

    pressure port parts showed no damageafter the tests. The pressure measurement

    during the tests worked well without

    malfunctions.

    Windtunnel test

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    20/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    23 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Data Acquisition System for SHEFEX II / EXPERT

    A similar electronic box is used for the SHEFEX II and EXPERT re-entry experiments. The dataacquisition system consists of the following PCBs:

    Analogue Amplification Card (AAC): Signal conditioning (filtering, amplification) of 28 sensor

    channels. This card was designed, manufactured and tested at DLR Cologne.

    Multifunction Card (MFC): Digitization of the sensor signals and serial communication to the

    onboard computer. This card is provided by DLR MORABA.

    Power Distribution Card (PDC): Power conversion for the power supply of active sensors.

    This card was designed, manufactured and tested at DLR Cologne.

    SHEFEX II EBX

    interior view

    EXPERT EBX

    exterior view

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    21/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    24 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Data Acquisition System for SHEFEX II / EXPERT

    A major issue for the electronics of the data acquisition system are the high vibration and shockloads during launch and stage separation.

    For the EXPERT project the data acquisition system was qualified according to ESA standards

    for a very severe random vibration environment up to 35 gRMS and shock loads up to 1000g.

    EBX OOP Random vibration environment(qualification)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 500 1000 1500 2000

    Frequency [Hz]

    ASD

    [g^2/Hz]

    EBX Shock Specification (qualification)

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    10 100 1000 10000

    Frequency [Hz]

    SRS[g]

    Due to the severe random vibration a special mounting frame was designed for the electronic

    cards using structural PSD analysis to minimize the card vibrations.

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    22/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    25 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Aerothermal heating on the capsule front surface and back cover

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    23/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    26 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    COMARS+ and Radiometer on EDM Back Cover

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    24/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    27 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Overview Sensors

    COMARS+ 1

    Pressure sensorPressure signal 1

    Reference temperature 2

    Heat flux sensorHeat flux signal 3

    Reference temperature 4

    Optical fiber (CNES) Sensor 1 5Sensor 2 6

    COMARS+ 2

    Pressure sensorPressure signal 7

    Reference temperature 8

    Heat flux sensorHeat flux signal 9

    Reference temperature 10

    Optical fiber (CNES)Sensor 1 11

    Sensor 2 12

    COMARS+ 3

    Pressure sensorPressure signal 13

    Reference temperature 14

    Heat flux sensorHeat flux signal 15

    Reference temperature 16

    Optical fiber (CNES)Sensor 1 17

    Sensor 2 18

    RadiometerSignal 19

    Reference Temperature 20

    !!! Reference temperature means the temperature of the sensing element of each sensor and not i ts case !!!

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    25/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    28 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    COMARS+ Sensor

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    26/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    29 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Details of COMARS+ Sensor

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    27/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    30 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    DLR radiometer for Exomars EDM flight

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    28/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    31 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Thermal analysis at flight conditions

    Temperature of radiometer mounting surface

    -45

    -25

    -5

    15

    35

    55

    75

    95

    115

    135

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600Time [s]

    Temperature[C]

    Temperature of radiometermounting surface

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    29/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    32 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Tests in the arc jet facil ity L2K

    M-I M-II M-III

    mass flow rate of CO222

    /NCO

    mm [g/s] 39/1.2 39/1.2 39/1.2

    reservoir pressure0

    p [hPa] 730 910 950

    specific enthalpy0h [MJ/kg] 4.7 9.3 10.4

    total temperature0T [K] 2663 3300 3432

    nozzle throat/exit diameter et D/D [mm] 29/100 29/100 29/100

    distance from nozzle exit ex [mm] 160 160 160

    distance from nozzle throat tx [mm] 329 329 329

    free stream static pressure p1 [hPa] 2.02 1.97 1.84

    free stream static temperature T1 [K] 998 881 833

    free stream density 1 [kg/m3] 9.410

    -4 8.210-4 7.710-4

    free stream velocity v1 [m/s] 2083 2498 2592

    mole fraction of CO22

    COn [] 0.647 0.211 0.153

    mole fraction of CO COn [] 0.203 0.461 0.486

    mole fraction of O22

    On [] 0.093 0.159 0.149

    mole fraction of O On [] 0.013 0.132 0.175

    mole fraction of N22N

    n [] 0.038 0.026 0.024

    mole fraction of NONOn [] 0.005 0.011 0.012

    mole fraction of NNn [] < 10

    -6 < 10-6 < 10-6

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    30/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    33 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Calibration tests on the DLR radiometers are in progress

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    31/32

    IPPW-8 > 6.-10. June 2011, Portsmouth

    36 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Calibration tests on the DLR radiometers (sensor 2) in L2K

    0.86

    1.1

    4

    0.7

    6

    M - III

    950 mbar

    M - I

    730 mbar

    M - II

    910 mbar

    time [s]

    radiativeheat

    fluxrate[kW/m2]

    0 100 200 300-0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

  • 7/27/2019 2 Guelhan Instrumentation

    32/32

    37 > Challenges of the Instrumentation for High Speed Entry Vehicles > A. Glhan

    Conclusions

    Although the recovery action failed, SHEFEX-I flight experiment was a bigsuccess with respect to complete flight trajectory until the parachute failureat an altitude of about 13.5 km.

    Almost the complete instrumentation provided very clear and reliable flightdata, which showed a very good consistency with the rocket platform data.

    SHEFEX-II with more sophisticated instrumentation (140 sensors) will belaunched in September11. The flight Mach number will be above 10.

    ESA flight experimental vehicle EXPERT has to withstand very high

    thermo-mechanical and dynamic loads. Therefore the instrumentation andelectronic components are designed in such a way that they can surviveshock loads up to 1000 g and random loads up to 35 gMRS.

    Based on SHEFEX and EXPERT experience DLR developed a new

    combined sensor COMARS+, which allows measuring the temperature,heat flux rate, pressure and radiative heating simultanously. Its preliminarydesign for the EDM Mission in 2016 has been completed