Upload
british-council
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
20 kan ogata mhi session 4
Citation preview
11
What does industry need from universities?
11 January 2012
Kan Ogata Technology and Innovation Headquarters
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
UK-Japan Symposium on Building International University-Business Links
Industry Needs
22
MHI Products
・ 事業所技術部門(16,000人)・ 研究所 6ヶ所(2,100人)・ 先端科学技術の活用・ オープンイノベーションの推進(国内外の大学、研究法人と連携)
革新的製造加工技術 統合数値
シミュレーション
サプライチェーンマネジメント技術
センシング知能化技術
新材料利用技術
省エネルギー技術
エネルギー多様化技術
環境負荷低減技術
エネルギー貯蔵技術
資源循環利用技術未利用エネルギー
資源利用技術
営業・サービス技術
GTCC
エコシップ
IGCC
APWR
FBRCCS
風車
太陽光
地熱
次世代自動車部品
超高効率ヒートポンプ
次世代LRT・APM
高速鉄道
GTL/CTL
海洋開発
次世代フォーク
宇宙機器宇宙開発
MRJ航空機
エネルギー発電
交通輸送
バイオマス
医療機械 印刷機械
工作機械
有機EL照明wakamaru
産業インフラ
環境装置
製鉄機械
リチウムイオン電池
環境社会
GTCC
エコシップ
IGCC
APWR
FBRCCS
風車
太陽光
地熱
次世代自動車部品
超高効率ヒートポンプ
次世代LRT・APM
高速鉄道
GTL/CTL
海洋開発
次世代フォーク
宇宙機器宇宙開発
MRJ航空機
エネルギー発電
交通輸送
バイオマス
医療機械 印刷機械
工作機械
有機EL照明wakamaru
産業インフラ
環境装置
製鉄機械
リチウムイオン電池
環境社会
EnergyPower Generation
Industrial Infrastructure
Environmental Society
Innovative Manufacturing
Technology Integrated Numerical Simulation
Supply Chain Management Technology
Sales/Services Technology
Sensor Intelligence Technology
Resource Recycling Technology
Untapped Energy Application Technology
Environmental Load Reduction Technology
Energy Storage Technology
Energy Diversification Technology
Energy Saving Technology
New Material Application Technology
- Technical Divisions (16,000 staff)- 6 Research Centers (2,100 staff)- Use of Advanced Scientific Technologies- Promotion of Open Innovation (Collaboration with Domestic/Overseas Universities and Research Institutes)
Aircraft
Space Development
Space Equipment
Marine Development
Eco Vessel
High-Speed Railway
Next-Gen LRT/APM
Next-Gen Forklift
Next-Gen Automobile
Parts
Engineering Equipment
Printing Equipment Ironwork
Machinery Organic EL Lighting
Medical Equipment
Environmental System
Lithium-Ion Battery
Super High-EfficiencyHeat Pump
Geothermal
Biomass
Solar
Wind Turbine
Transportation
33
• Japan's corporate R&D spending decreased for two consecutive years following the Lehman Shock; total spending in 2009 was down 12 percent compared to previous year
• The majority of R&D spending was devoted to improvement of existing technologies and only a small (and dwindling) portion was directed to mid- to long-term R&D projects that are key for future growth, causing concerns for a lack of innovations leading to ground-breaking product development; the amount spent on duplicated R&D efforts among various companies is significant
Corporate R&D: Budget Cut, Shorter Timeframe, and Duplication
[Unit: trillion yen]
Data based on Scientific Technology Research Report published by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
2010 Industrial Technology Research: Corporate Survey on Open Innovation (Number of respondents: 824)
Not duplicated
38%
Q: To the best of your knowledge, what is the percentage of your R&D projects that are duplicated with other company's?
Approx. 90%Approx. 10%1-2%
E.g., automobile model change, seasonal design change for mobile phones
Estimate based on interviews of engineering executives of 50 companies with large R&D spending concerning ratio of three research categories
R&D Budget Cut Shorter R&D Time Frame
Non-
conti
nuou
s re
sear
chCo
mmer
cially
via
ble re
sear
ch
Impr
ovem
ent
of ex
isting
tec
hnolo
gy Improvement of existing technology(commercialization in less than 3 years)
High-difficult technology; commercial viability currently unclear (commercialization in more than 10 years)
E.g., quantum dot solar cell, lithium-air battery, nanocarbon
Further improvement required; commercial viability (commercialization in 5-10 years)
E.g., organic EL, electric car, lithium-ion battery
R&D Duplication with Other Companies
44
• Recent public R&D projects are also facing shorter time frames; meanwhile, long-term projects conducted since the Oil Shock (e.g., Sunshine/Moonlight programs) are key factors in Japan's global lead in solar/fuel cell technologies
• Collaboration across ministries and agencies including MEXT and METI (both responsible for base technology development) critical in public R&D projects
Public R&D
Data based on METI report
U.S.-Japan Scientific Technology R&D Budget Comparisons
Key Public Projects Importance of Interagency Collaboration
Universities 36%
MEXT 67%
MHLW 67% MAFF
3%
National Science Foundation 3%
NASA8% DOE 7% Other 7%
U.S.A.13.95 trillion yen
(2010)
Japan3.6485 trillion yen
(2011)
MOD 3%
Academic
Commercialization
Nat
iona
l Ins
titut
e of
Hea
lth
20%
Def
ense
Dep
t. 54
%
ME
TI
16%
Oth
er 8
%
National R&D Project Corporate Development Phase Commercialization
Firs
t Oil
Cris
is (1
973)
Pho
tovo
ltaic
Cel
l
Sunshine Program
Total Budget ¥515.6 Billion
Spending: Approx. ¥100 Billion (1974-1992)
New Sunshine ProgramTotal Budget: ¥354.7 BillionSpending: Approx. ¥70 Billion (1993-2000)
- 1999-2007: World’s Largest Market Sharefor Nine Consecutive Years
- 2009: Domestic Production of 1,500 MW (Approx. ¥500 Billion)Second Largest Market Share in the World (14.1%)
World’s Top Market Share (1999-2007)
Independent Development by Companies (1993- )
Implementation Subsidy (Residential)Approx. ¥133 Billion (1994- )
Implementations Using Government Subsidies: Approx. 300,000 Cases
Fuel
Cel
ls
Moonlight Program
Total Budget ¥129.5 Billion
Spending: Approx. ¥63 Billion (1981-2000)
Independent Development by Companies (1990- )
World's First Household Fuel Cell
System Development/Verification Study, etc.Approx. ¥83 Billion
Implementation SubsidyApprox. ¥13 Billion (2009- )
Implementations Using Government Subsidies: Approx. 10,000 Cases
Comm
ercia
lizati
on of
Ene
-Far
m
55
Scientific Technology R&D
Field of scientific technology: encompassing a wide range of disciplines from discovery (science)to application (technology)
Science: exploration of principles and truth
- Uncertain commercial viability
Technology: tool for practical applications
- Contribution to prosperous and safe society
All areas of scientific technology R&D from science to technology to be promoted through collaboration and appropriate distribution of roles between industry, academia and government
In 3-5 Yrs
Industry-Led Development of Necessary Technology
Scie
ntifi
c Te
chno
logy
Inno
vativ
enes
sU
ncer
tain
tyH
igh Science
(Government Initiative)
Low
Technology (Industry Initiative)
Innovative Technology for Change and Expansion of Industry Structure
Promising Technology That May Contribute to Human Progress (Commercial Viability Unclear)
Target Timeline In 5-15 Yrs 15 Yrs –
66
Role Distribution in Industry/Academia/Government Collaboration
Academia1. Create innovative ideas and bring
together various knowledge domains2. Foster high-achieving individuals capable
of succeeding in the world
Government1. Establish scientific technology strategy with clear vision for
the future2. Clarify R&D focus areas in accordance with strategy,
secure appropriate budget, coordinate infrastructure
Industry1. Transform science into practical application
through services, products and technologies that benefit society
2. Promote R&D, collaborate with national research institutes and universities, and mutually review and exploit the benefits of research outcomes
77
Industry/Academia/Government R&D Example: Gas Turbine
Target: Development of element technology capable of achieving combined generation efficiency of 56 percent and verification of system feasibility
Development time frame: 4 years (FY2008-2011), ongoing from FY 2012
Development team: METI, ANRE, MEXT, NIMS (interagency collaboration project)Osaka U, Kyushu U, U of Tokyo, Hokkaido U, Osaka Inst. of Technology
Elemental Technology Development for Gas Turbine
Compressor
High-Pressure/High-Performance Compressor
Turbine High-Performance Cooling SystemLow-Thermal-Conductivity Thermal Barrier CoatingSuper Heat-Resistant Material Development*High-Load/High-Performance Turbine
EGR: Exhaust Gas Recirculation
*MEXT Initiative
Combustor Low NOxCombustion System
METI MHI
MEXT NIMS (High Thermal
Resistant Material)
Kyoto U (High Thermal Resistant Material)
Support: 2/3Collaboration
Collaboration
Commission/Joint Research
Osaka U (Thermal Transmission)Kyushu U (Compressor Gausing Technology)Hokkaido U (Tokyo U) (Combustion Simulation)Osaka Institute of Technology (Turbine Aerodynamics)
8
Expectations for Universities and Other Educational Institutions
- Enhancement of basic academic abilitiesPlus, curriculum that addresses fundamental technologies
- Practical science educationLearning based on actual products and on-site research at manufacturing facility
- Multi-course curriculum in master's program(researcher/engineer courses)
2. Foster high-achieving individuals capable of succeeding in the world
- Creation of groundbreaking ideas for innovation and integration of various knowledge domains
- World-leading research projects, regional development, specialist training, and continuing education
- Establishment of world's top research facility designed for specific field for each region
- Development of university alliance and network
1. Create innovative ideas and bring together various knowledge domains