View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1. Introduction 1. Background of study 2. Location requirements 3. An object of study area
2.Main Body1.Digital map and thematic map extraction(by each
layer)2.Three dimensional analysis3. Reclassification, weighting4.Conversion : Raster to features5.Final: Union
3.Conclusion1.Best place2.Worst place3.Result value of Attribute data 4.Outcome
Elevation
TIN
elegrid
slpgrid
aspgrid
sungrid
elegrid_rec
slpgrid_rec
aspgrid_rec
sungrid_rec
elegrid_ft
slpgrid_ft
aspgrid_ft
sungrid_ft
Create TIN from feature
TIN to raster
slope
aspect
hillshade
Reclassify Raster to feature
FINAL
unionCAD FILE
stream
house
road
grave
stream_rec
house_rec
road_rec
grave_rec
stream_ft
house_ft
road_ft
grave_ft
union
Dissolve
AspectrecValue Spatial rating
Flat(~1) 4
0~22.5 1
22.5~67.5 2
67.5~112.5 5
112.3~157.5 5
157.5~202.5 6
202.5~247.5 4
247.5~292.5 3
292.5~337.5 2
337.5~360 1
[Right side of the best place ] [Left side of the
best place]Use : An orchard, water celery vinyl greenhouse
This area which is
marked on the map is
quite close to the optimal
one.
Actually, It’s hard to
distinguish it without the
red circle because it’s a
very limited area.
As you see, most of the
bad sites are located on a
steep slope or some of
places are just beside
mountain streams.
1. Convenience
- The optimal area is
located on a main street
of the town.
- There is a supermarket,
a bus-stop and senior
citizen’s centre just
behind the optimum.
2. area
- 4 houses on the
area in the past.
- So, If you are willing to
build a garden-housing
there, It will be enough
size for 2 houses.
3. Position
- A wide panorama &
Plenty of sunshine
- Not that far from the
city centre by a
private car.
4. Differences
- The optimum is near
the local people’s
living area comparing
with the garden-
housings which are
located in down town.