34
2006034284 이이이 2006034308 이이이 2008014026 이이이 2006014012 이이이 2007014013 이이이 2005014007 이이이 2008023011 이이이

2006034284 이동구 2006034308 진경모 2008014026 허경진 2006014012 신영미 2007014013 손우재 2005014007 김은지 2008023011 송수정

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

2006034284 이동구2006034308 진경모2008014026 허경진2006014012 신영미2007014013 손우재2005014007 김은지2008023011 송수정

1. Introduction 1. Background of study 2. Location requirements 3. An object of study area

2.Main Body1.Digital map and thematic map extraction(by each

layer)2.Three dimensional analysis3. Reclassification, weighting4.Conversion : Raster to features5.Final: Union

3.Conclusion1.Best place2.Worst place3.Result value of Attribute data 4.Outcome

Natural condition

Social conditions

• Location : Yongsu-dong, Dong-

gu, Daegu, Korea• Appraised value of

land :

Elevation

TIN

elegrid

slpgrid

aspgrid

sungrid

elegrid_rec

slpgrid_rec

aspgrid_rec

sungrid_rec

elegrid_ft

slpgrid_ft

aspgrid_ft

sungrid_ft

Create TIN from feature

TIN to raster

slope

aspect

hillshade

Reclassify Raster to feature

FINAL

unionCAD FILE

stream

house

road

grave

stream_rec

house_rec

road_rec

grave_rec

stream_ft

house_ft

road_ft

grave_ft

union

Dissolve

extraction of Numerical map

elevation

housestream

road grave

elegrid

slopegrid

sungrid

aspgrid

elegrid

graveden

houseden

gravedis

roaddis

gravedis

roaddis

streamdis

sloprec sunrecelerec

Cell size - 3Classify – 6 classes (Natural Breaks)

AspectrecValue Spatial rating

Flat(~1) 4

0~22.5 1

22.5~67.5 2

67.5~112.5 5

112.3~157.5 5

157.5~202.5 6

202.5~247.5 4

247.5~292.5 3

292.5~337.5 2

337.5~360 1

Value Spatial rating

0~20m 1

20~40m 2

40~60m 3

60~80m 4

80~100m 5

100~120m 6

graverec

streamrec

Value Spatial rating

0~20m 1

20~40m 2

40~60m 6

60~80m 5

80~100m 3

100~120m 2

roadrec

Value Spatial rating

0~20m 1

20~40m 2

40~60m 6

60~80m 5

80~100m 3

100~120m 2

TM

: 170731.30(E),

275087.01(N)

Conversion into

: 35.975586,

128.676122

(longitude &

latitude)    

[Right side of the best place ] [Left side of the

best place]Use : An orchard, water celery vinyl greenhouse

This area which is

marked on the map is

quite close to the optimal

one.

Actually, It’s hard to

distinguish it without the

red circle because it’s a

very limited area.

As you see, most of the

bad sites are located on a

steep slope or some of

places are just beside

mountain streams.

[Left side of worst place] [right side of worst place]

There are country housing sites below the best place.

최적지The best

The worst

Appraised value of land : 179,000/ m²

Appraised value of land : 1,290/ m²

1. Convenience

- The optimal area is

located on a main street

of the town.

- There is a supermarket,

a bus-stop and senior

citizen’s centre just

behind the optimum.

2. area

- 4 houses on the

area in the past.

- So, If you are willing to

build a garden-housing

there, It will be enough

size for 2 houses.

3. Position

- A wide panorama &

Plenty of sunshine

- Not that far from the

city centre by a

private car.

4. Differences

- The optimum is near

the local people’s

living area comparing

with the garden-

housings which are

located in down town.

5. Transportation

- It’s difficult to get this

area if you haven’t got

own your car.

• So, It would be the best choice to build a country house in the best place.

• GIS is very convenient compared to the field survey. It can save time, money.

• GIS provide very objective, accurate data

• GIS can conclude many kinds of data• GIS is very practical study, so this can

be used very widely.• Google Earth, GPS, Navigation

-> Close relation to our real life