· 2012. 11. 17. · 1160 30' r Quaternary allu Tertiary volcani Mesozoic grani Paleozoic sedim 0 10 km N Geologic 1981. 1160 15' 17 1160 001 17 •.'-!.':; ":'.; :Pahute Mesa -

1160 30' r

Quaternary allu

Tertiary volcani

Mesozoic grani

Paleozoic sedim

0 10

km

N

Geologic 1981.

1160 15' 17

1160 001 17

•.'-!.':; ":'.; :Pahute Mesa - :•

""•Gold Meadows 370151 Stock

c rocks Rain er-". I .- Mesa

tic rocks

entary rocks : -Buckboard

370 00' F[ Mesa

20..• Il*

Jackass Flelf-

-I

-t

360 45° P-

Mercury

map of the Nevada Test Site showing location of Rainier Mesa and Aqueduct Mesa. From Murray,

VQ Q 30 1j10 r

plate 4.2.5.3-1

cfoF-ý

KTable I.--Stdte of stress determined in U]2g tunnel main drift bypass (USBN overcore method)

|•--, nut applicable)

Stress magnitude Standard deviation Bearing Inclination

"+ degrces a•tcve hoz izo:IUal MPa MPa - degrees below

Principal stresses

"comere~sfon)

SI (minimum) +2.6 ±0.4 N. 680 W. -70

S2 (maximum) +8.5 ±0.5 N. 21" E. +20

S 3 (intermediate) +6.8 ±0.3 N. 830 W. *20W

Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertJi.al) coordinate system

(+. compression)

x +3.5 ±0.3 East Horizontal

y +7.7 ±0.5 North Horizontal

*z 6.7 ±0.3 --- Vertical

1/ Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system--

xy +2.0 A0.3 --

T yz *0.3 10.3

zx -0.5 A.0.2

-- eositive or negative sign on shear streas iagnitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X. Y. Z coordinate sy:tera.

State of in situ stress. U12g tunnel, main drift bypass. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-2

K (

(

S1 2.6 14P1a N. 68" W. -7)

S,-BI.ý MI'd N. 21 1. *2

S 6.$ MP1, N. B3' W. 482

VIk I ICAIL

S - I

NOR [Il

Graphical representation of principal stresses. Ul2g tunnel, main drift bypass. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3.-3

(

Table 2.--State of stress determiined in U12e.06 drift (USBM overcore method) 1---. not applicable)


+ degrees above

Ha Impa horizontal •l~d ~a -degrees below

ho ri ;.: nt a .

Principal stresses

c(o+. compression)

S1 (minimum) +3.7 10.5 N. 880 E. -200

S2 (maximum) +6.6 ±0.5 N. 510 W. -640

S 3 (intermediate) +4.7 ±0.4 N. 40 E. *160

Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system

(+, compression)

0 x *4.0 ±0.4 East Horizontal

o y *4.8 ±0.4 North ilorizontdi

z *6.1 ±0.5 --- Vertical

Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate systeml/

xy -0.2 ±0.3 --

Tyz -0.5 W0.3

z. *0.9 ±0.4

--Vlositive or negative sign o:i shear !;trCe; uxignitude Indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X. Y, Z cooldinatie systren.

State of in situ stress. Ul2e.06 drift. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-4

Principal stresses

-ompresson)

S1 (minimum) *2.8 -0.4 N. 75* H. *12*

S2 (maximum) *6.9 to.4 N. 40 E. -400

S3 (intermediate) *6.0 W0.4 N. 28* E. +480

Normal stress components in X. Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system

(i, compression)

x 3.1 0.4 Wast Horizontal

y +6.3 W0.4 North Horizontal

0z *6.2 ±0.3 --- Vertical

Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate systemJ

xy .0.8 W0.3

T yz -0.6 t0.3

zi io.6 tO.3

1 'or reg.tive sign on sheer stre:s i:'agNittude indicates direction of shear strcss with respect to X. Y, Z (:ooldiejaC sysLcn.

State of in situ stress. U12e.18 working point Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-5

UJ12e. 18 worki ng poi t

Graphical representation of principal stresses. U12e tunnel complex. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

nlat- 4.2.5.3-6

(

UI~le.010 drift


+ degrees abcve horizontal

mPa MPa - de;rees below

hori;:nntat

Principal stresses

(+. romnre~q1n n)

S 1 (minimum) +2.4 t0.9 N. 440 W. -20

S 2 (maximum) +8.5 10.5 N. 47" E. -200

S3 (intermediate) +5.6 ±tO.4 N. 420 E. *700


(+, com.pression)

ax +5.4 ±1.0 East Horizontal

Y +5.2 A0.4 North Horizontal

+ ±6.0 ±0.4 Vertical

1/ Shear.stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate sysTe.-

xy *2.9 t0.5

yz -0.6 ±0.3

zx -0.7 ±0.5

i/eositive or negative sign on shear 3trc!s magnitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X, Y, Z coordinate systcM.

State of in situ stress. U12n.07 drift. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-7


+ degrcees ajuve hut izoiE aI IHPd M'Pa - dt|-tc•es I~lou1

ul.ot i .0..,10I

Principal stresses

(+. ennpress ;on)

S1 (minimum) *1.4 10.5 N. 490 W. +220

S2 (maximum) +11.7 10.8 N. 590 E. *37"

S3 (Intermediate) t5.8 t0.4 N. 180 E. -450

Normal stress components in X, Y, Z (cast, north, vertical) coordinate system.

(+, compression)

ax *6.4 to. 5 East ilur i zon ta I

y *5.A i0.3 North Horizontal

Z *7.4 t0.3 --- Vertical

.Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system-/

xy *3.5 ±0.3

yz *0.5 tO.2

zx *3.6 tO.8

4ositive or negative sign on shear stress L!.agiitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to X, Y, Z coordinate system.

State of in situ stress. U12n.l0 working point. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-8


+ degrees above hurizoratal

Pa Wei- degrees ielows

Principal stresses

+cjmjre.qs ion)

S (minimum) +5.7 ±0.7 N. 590 W. *500

S2 (maximum) *8.6 A0.4 N. 530 E. *170

S3 'intermediate) *6.2 ±0.4 N. 250 W. -340


(+, compression)

0x +7.4 ±0.7 East iot i.ontal

oy 16.9 ±0.7 North Horizontal

GZ +6.1 10.4 --- Vertical

1/ Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system

xy *1.1 ±0.4 ......

y z + 0 . 3 1 0 .4 . . .. . .

zx *0.8 ±0.4

-- 4'ositive or negative sign on shear streais Laagnitude itndlcaiei direction of shear str,,s witih respect to X, Y, Z ceordinate system.

State of in situ stress. U12n.1OA working point. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-9

/

(


+ degrces above 1,13 MPa lihorizon taI

- degrees below ho ri .o:•rt a!

Principal stresses

(+c arm.resston)

S1 (mJnimum) +3.8 ±0.7 N. 2* E. +220

S 2 (maximun) +7.0 ±1.0 N. 840 W. -90

S, (intermediate) *6.1 -t0.7 N. 270 E. -66*

Normal stress components in X, Y. Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate system

(+, conpresslon)

ox t7.0 tl .0 East Hori-zontal

y +4.1 10.7 North Horizontal

0z 65.8 10.6 --- Vertical

Shear stress components in X, Y, Z coordinate system!

Ky -0.2 10 .8 ......

yz -0 .8 A0 .5 ......

zx #0.1 W0.6

-A-kosltive or negative slg. on slihat utzess L:agaitude indicates direction of shear strcL.s with respect to X, Y, Z coordina:c systera.

State of in situ stress. Ul2n.lOB structures drift. Rainier Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3- 10

K

Graphical representation of principal stress. Ul2n tunnel complex. Rainier Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3-11

SI-2.4 MPd N.440 W. -2"

Sj-b-b NV.. 11.421. .I0' VLIRALA

F1 4

I~d N 49'W 4 226

NV. N 59 t. oil

Sj-!5.8 Wd. N 1,3"t -45-' V1WI ICAL

S,

U11ii. 10 wurl, Ing pointia

HUHI(IIt

S,-3.d NP. N.02"I. #2?'

S,,-j.U NP. N.84"W. -9- NIHIIAl

S,-6.1 NP. 01.211I. -66'

1i1?11 10 Bi -. tructui..' di11l1

HUH III

'AS I

Sj-5.7 NP. N.59'W. *SO"

Sc 8 .6 Nwd N.53'f. t1l'

SI-6.2 Wd. U.25'W. -34'

S31.

tli.?. IOA wormk Ing pl

-LASI

U12ii.01 drift


+ degrees above

hor izont-aI IPda - degrees below

Principal stresses

S1 (minimu,1) $2.6 ±0.5 N. 620 W. +30

S2 (maximum) $6.6 t0.5 N. 130 E. $860

S, (Inzerniediate) +5.9 t0.4 N. 280 E. -30

Norinal stress components in X, Y, Z (east, north, vertical) coordinate syste.-a

(+, compression)

0x +3.3 ±0.4 East HorizontalI

oy +5.2 ±0.4 North Horizontal

0Z +6.6 ±0.5 --- Vertical

Shear stress components in X., Y, Z coordinate system

xy $1.4 ±0.3 ......

yz -0.1 ±0.5

zx W0.2 W0.5 ......

4-aositive or negative sign ot :h-ar iitres L.agnltude indicates directicn of shear stress with respect io X, Y, Z coozdina:e systen.

State of in situ stress. Ul2t.02 SRI alcove. Aqueduct Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-12


+ degrees abuve horizoUtal

MPa MPa - degrees below

Principal, stresses

J±. omress| nn)

S 1 (minimum) t4.3 ±1.0 N. 370 W. .

S2 (maximum) *8.1 ±0.8 N. 330 E. -290

S3 (intermediate) +5.2 10.9 N. 890 E. +45O


(+, compression)

X *5.6 ±0.8 East Horizontal

oy +6.3 ±0.8 North Hlorizontdl

+ +5.6 ±0.8 --- Vertical

1/ Shear stress ccnponents in X, Y, Z coordinate systemI

x y * 1 .3 ± 0 .5 . . .. . .

Tyz -1.4 ±0.7 --

zx -0.4 ±0.6 ......

1kositive or negative sign on 5hear stre';s ia.g:nitude indicates direction of shear stress with respect to

X, Y, Z coordinate sys:em.

State of in situ stress. Ul2t.03 working point. Aqueduct Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-13

(

Graphical representation of principal stresses. U12t tunnel complex. Aqueduct Mesa. From Ellis and Magner, 1980.

plate 4.2.5.3-14

VI 10 I CAL

I . S

SI

%

CASI

1112t.02 SlRI dlcove:

•' '.fj 1411, N. 62"i,. f 3" "%,,ý6.6 141'd N./31°. flib"

SI .S.9 1411a N.281 '. - J"

STRESS (MPa)

E

0

X I.

w a

crH max DIRECTION

E

State of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa. From Haimson, 1983.

plate 4.2.5.3-15

State of in situ stress. U12n and U12g tunnels. Rainier Mesa. From Haimson, 1983.

plate 4.2.5.3-16

DEPTH [i] BELOW LAND o'•. •* WY..?7,4Z.

LOCATION SURFACE [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]

U1 2n Tunnel 232 1.0 4.3 5.8

U12n Tunnel 284 2.2 5.2 7.4

U12n Tunnel 300 3.0 5.4 8.2

U12n Tunnel 314 3.6 5.8 6.9

U12n Tunnel 346 3.1 6.3 7.0

U12n Tunnel 364 3.1 6.7 8.7

U12n Tunnel 378 3.0 7.0 9.0

U12n Tunnel 378 4.0 7.0 9.0

Ul 2n Tunnel 380 3.5 7.0 9.0

U12n Tunnel 400 3.4 7.3 9.1

U12n Tunnel 405 3.2 7.5 9.2

U12n Tunnel 410 4.0 7.6 10.7

U12g Tunnel 426 3.0 7.3 7.5

K,

or1 = 8.5 MPa

a2 = 6.8 MPa

O3 = 2.6 MPa

PORE PRESS - 0 (VADOSE ZONE)

ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 442m

(

c = 26 bars:

10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - -,,f

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12g tunnel, main drift bypass. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3.-17

(

10

), 4n, LlJ

i

.1" X:

V)

0

0

or, = 6.6 MPa

O2 = 4.7 MPa

oo = 3.7 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 408m

10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - o-,,/

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12e.06 drift. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3.-18

a,: = 37 bars.

10

I

in

u.) 'I)

I.

Twn

0

0

011

or, = 6.9 MPa

(7 2 = 6.0 MPa

o7 = 2.8 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 383m

al1

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - o,,

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12e working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3-19

( (

or, = 28 bars.

10

LU

IU)

0

ol = 8.5 MPa

or2 = 5.6 MPa

a3 = 2.4 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 381m

-or = 24 bars.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - an!

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.07 drift. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate-4.2.5.3.-20

10i

U)•

0

'K

or1 = 11.7 MPa

0"2 = 5.8 MPa

a,: = 14 bars.

ff3 = 1.4 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 3 98m

NOTE: QUESTIONABLE DATA - DO NOT USE WITHIN ZONE OF OPENING INFLUENCE.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - 0"-1

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.10 working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

(

plate 4.2.5.3.-21

10

V) V)

uj LU

V)

0a,1

erl = 8.6 MPa

Cr2 = 6.2 MPa

173 = 5.7 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 388m

cr = 57 bars.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,,!

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.10A working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3.-22

10

U) U)

iI

U)

0

[

O"1

or, = 7.0 MPa 0,c = 38 bars.

02 = 6.1 MPa

0s = 3.8 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 393m

01

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - an!

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n.10B structures drift. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.53.-23

10

cc I

(f)

a:

IJL U)

0

< !

(

or, = 6.6 MPa

or2 = 5.9 MPa

o03 = 2.6 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 428m

26 bars.

0 10 20 30


[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12t.02 SRI alcove. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

pla., 4 2.5.3-24

I0

V) LU

V)

LU

0'1 = 8.1 MPa

0'2 = 5.2 MPa

013 = 4.3 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 328m

0"1

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - o,4

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12t.03 working point. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3.-25

(

cr = 43 bars.

10

U) U) w IU)

w I U)

0

O'har.min = 1.0 MPa

'ho,..,-, = 5.8 MPa

aver = 4.3 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 232m

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,.t

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3.-26

a.: = 10 bars.

10

U~)

U-1

0

Crhor.min. = 2.2 MPa

hor.rwx. = 7.4 MPa

o,, = 5.2 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 284m

Grhor .max.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,!

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-27

or. = 22 bars.

10

w

U)

0

aora-.,,. = 3.0 MPa

, = 8.2 MPa

o•,. = 5.4 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 300m

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - o-,,f

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. U12n. tunnel. Rainier Mesa. Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3-28

or, = 30 bars.

10

uJ LU

Ill

V)

Lii

rLA

0

!

Ohor.min. = 3.6 MPa

ahor.mo=. = 6.9 MPa

Gtver = 5.8 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 314m

ahor.ma.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - oUnf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-29

or, = 36 bars.

10

0

(I) U/)

FU)r

wi "r" U.,

0

/-

ho,.mn. --- 3.1 MPa

h .,,-,=. --= 7.0 MPa

,,. = 6.3 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 346m

cT, = 31 bars.

ahor.mc=.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - orf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3 -30

10

V

V)

U)

0

6hor.min. = 3.1 MPa

ah.rma. = 8.7 MPa

a, = 6.7 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 364m

10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - o-!

[MPa]


plate 4.2 5.1-31

/ I

=c = 31 bars.

10

V~)

U)

LU ix

0

0

(

ahor.min. = 3.0 MPa

ahor.moa. = 9.0 MPa

aver = 7.0 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 378m

10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - 0.!

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-32

a= = 30 bars.

O0hor.min. - 4.0 MPa

Uhorr.na. = 9.0 MPa

o-,er = 7.0 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 378m

O'h•omam.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - onf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-33

10

UJ U)

X tU)

wr I Li)

0

c'c = 40 bars.

Uho,.mi. = 3.5 MPa

Uho,.,,,. = 9.0 MPa

= 7.0 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 380m

ffhor.u=.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,•!

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-34

o, = 35 bars.

10

U') wr I-

0

!

Gho.,min. = 3.4 MPa

chor.ma=. = 9.1 MPa

ctj,, = 7.3 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 400m

Ohor..ai.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - cn!

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress, U12n tunnel. Rainier Mesa, Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3.-35

(

cc = 34 bars.

10

(J) w a: I

a: w T

0

O'hor.min. = 3.2 MPa

Uhor.maw. = 9.2 MPa

ou,•, = 7.5 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 405m

O'hor.max.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,,f

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-36

( I

o¥ = 32 bars.

10

U) (I) w IU)

w I U)

0

Chor.min. = 4.0 MPa

O'hor..m. = 10.7 MPa

Cuer = 7.6 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 410m

CMr. m=.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - Cnf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.53.-37

or = 40 bars.

10

U) U) Iii

H U)

LU

U)

0

Ohoh...i,. = 3.0 MPa

t•,ý.,.x. = 7-5 MPa

Orver = 7.3 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

DEPTH - 426m

0 10 20 30


[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.3.-38

o'c = 30 bars.

.6

10

LU in

LIU)

LI "1"

0

CLOSURE PRESS -a.

50 II I I I

[bars]

100 ~ i I I I

LE \

LE

0

LE LE

L • 0o OLEO o 0 I\ E 040.

0 'k 0 (c =z "1 o'•. ef f

PORE PRESS - p a

f• WATER TABLE

r"UNDERPRESSURE"; -p = 161m and 547m, 'WINOGRAD AND THORDARSON. 1975.

HYDROLOGIC SETTING

Stress Location JDepth c cConditions

100 -

Rainier U12n

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

- hydrofrac

Rainier U12g - hydrofrac

UL12g

U12e.06

U12e

U12n.07

U12n.10

U12n.10A

U12n.IOB

U12t.02

U12t.03

232

284

300

314

346

364

378

378

380

400

405

410

426

442

408

383

381

398

388

393

428

328

10

22

30

38

31

31

30

40

35

34

32

40

30

26

37

28

24

14

57

38

26

43

EXPLANATION:

7 - cc BASED ON HYDROFRACTURE

LE

0 - LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM

0 a ,c BASED ON OVERCORING

State of in situ stress. Summary. Rainier Mesa and Aqueduct Mesa.

plate 4.2.5.3,39

0 0 o

LE

LE

nLE

nLE

nLE

nLE

LE

nLE

nLE

nLE

LE

nLE

nLE

LE

nLE

nLE

LE

LE

nLE

nLE

nLE

nLE

200._

T

ICL 0U a

300

400

500_

DEPTH

z

EXPLANATION

ON -Fault, known or inferred, "dotted where concealed

"sw°°° "" Existing drill hole

Alluvium 130" -•

V*- Miocene volcanic units

Geology simplified from Scott, R.B. (written commun., 1984)

d(AS of lea

SetI\\ii

116o30,

Map showing location of hydrofracture wells in the area of Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1986.

plate 4.2.5.4-1

0

200

400

-.

600

SCO0 8000

1200

1400

1600 L

STRESS (BARS) 100 200 300 400

NEVADA TEST SITE

USW-G1

\

NORMAL FAULTING

Hydraulic Fracturing Data Principal Stresses

Shut-In Minimum Breakdown Pumping Hydrostatic Pore Horizontal Vertical

Depth, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure,*t Stress Stress m MPa M Pa M Pa MPa MPa MPa* Comments

646 8.3 4.2 ± 0.2

10.2 13.2 13.5

7.2 ± 0.2 9.0 ± 0.2

10.6 + 0.2

6.2

7.9 9.2

10.3

18.8 12.1 ± 0.2 12.0 23.8 14.8 t 0.2 12.8

USW G-1 0.7 4.2 t 0.2 12.9 Minimum horizontal stress from flat

subhydrostatic pumping pressure attained during second cycle. S$ may thus be several bars too high due to pressure gradient in fracture.

2.2 7.2 _t 0.2 15.9 Same as above. 3.6 9.0 ± 0.2 19.2 Same as above. 4.5 10.6 t 0.2 21.4 Minimum horizontal stress from stable

instantaneous shut-in pressures attained in final cycles.

6.3 12.1 - 0.2 25.5 Same as above. 7.0 14.8 - 0.2 27.2 Same as above.

Results of in situ stress determinations in Well USW G-1. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1985.

plate 4.2.5.4-2

792 945

1038

1218 1288

0 0 '

200 S ',

400 q

- 600

S800

1200

1400

1600 L

STRESS (BARS)

100 200 1 T _

NEVADA TEST SITE

"USW G-2

' \

0

" ,NCPENT

NORMAL FAULTfNG

Hydraulic Fracturing Data Principal Stresses

Shut-In Minimum Breakdown Pumping Hydrostatic Pore Horizontal Vertical

Depth, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure, Pressure,*t Stress, Stress m MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa* Comments

USW G-2 295 5.1 5.1 + 0.1 2.9 0.0 5.1 + 0.1 6.1 Reopening preexisting fracture of

unknown orientation: shut-in pumping pressure is upper bound on S.

418 5.4 5.4 + 0.1 4.1 0.0 5.4 - 0.1 8.4 Same as above. 432 5.5 5.5 + 0.1 4.2 0.0 5.5 + 0.1 8.7 Same as above.

1026 16.3 11.1 + 0.2 10.1 4.9 11.1 ± 0.2 20.8 Minimum horizontal stress from stable pumping pressure on multiple cycles.

1209 18.2 12.0 + 0.2 11.8 6.7 12.0 - 0.2 25.5 Minimum horizontal stress from flat pumping pressure attained on second cycle. S. thus may be several bars too high due to pressure gradient in fracture.

"Calculated for the appropriate density and depth. tBased on water table at 576 m depth in USW G-I and 526 m depth in USW G-2.


plate 4.2.5.4-3

300 i

400

PAINTBRUSH TUFF

CR '\TER FLAT

TUFF

TRAM MEMBER

LITHIC RIDGE

BEDDED TUFF

Shut-in HydroLogged Breakdown pumping static Pore 2

Hole depth pressure1 pressure pressure pressure Sh Sv 3 T4 SH Comments (m) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars)

G-3 1,074

G-3 1,338

G-3 1,356

79

173

168

68

115

114

105

131

133

31 68+2 206

56 115+2

57 114+2

258

263

13 107+10

59 175+9 Interpretation based on first two cycles only.

64 181+8


plate 4.2.5.4-4

( /

C/) cr LU I-LLJ

I-a. 0U 0

500

1000

1500

(

Ue-25p# 1

I,

-+ lower bound on Sh

<-0 upper

OSh

bound on Sh

0 SH

.Opp

<(O

Shut-in HydroLogged Breakdown pumping static Pore2

Hole depth pressure' pressure pressure pressure Sh Sv 3 T4 SH Comments (m) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars) (bars)

P1 1,564 none1

PI 1,573

Pal 1,693 none 1

153

154

166

115 337+2

116 207+2

128 365+10

353

356

388

Reopening preexisting fracture

41 310+11

Reopening preexisting fracture

plate 4.2.5.4-5

(

0 100

500

1000

COr Cr

lLU

IIW CL

2000

236

337

207

366

1. No clear breakdown pressures seen

Results of in situ stress determinations in Well UE-25p#1. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1986.

I?

Results of in situ stress determinations in Well UE-25p#1. Yucca Mountain. From Stock et al., 1982.

(

Plate 4.2.5.4.-6

-1. = 35 bars.

Ohor.min = 4.2 MPa

PORE PRESS - 0.7 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

ever.

I I I I I

0 .Crha•.min.eff 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - -,,1

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole G-1, depth 646 m. Yucca Mountain.

plate 4.2.5.4-7

10

i) (I) U

LU

r

LU

0

(

O',r=12.9 MPa

(

o,,,, = 15.9 MPa

7hor.min = 7.2 MPa

PORE PRESS -2.2 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

o- = 50 bars.

101 4ý = 5 300

w - ¢' V') FAI

ahor.min (7hor.mnin. Crver.eff O'er

0 f - T- I -~~ I I

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS

[MPa)


plate 4.2.5.4.-8

(

o'. = 19.2 MPa -7, 54 bars.

rhor.min = 9.0 MPa

PORE PRESS = 3.6 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

10,.n "• =300

uJ, 450 w- 'V

uJ

U)

0•ro.eff hom.min. Uvei.eff. Crve 0 I - I I -I

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-9

(

( (

Over = 21.4 MPa

0'hor.min = 10.6 MPa

PORE PRESS -4.5 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

(

a, = 61 bars.

- 10a , • = 300

LU 4 450 I-..

'I) CL

W I

0 hor.min.eff ahor~min. 0ver.eff Uver

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS -an

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-10

O'ver = 25.5 MPa

aho,.mi- = 12.1 MPa

PORE PRESS -6.3 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,,f

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-11

o,ý = 58 bars.

LU

I

X:

VI -1-

10

07 'ver.eff O'vet

o,., = 27.2 MPa

Uho.min = 14.8 MPa

PORE PRESS -7.0 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

a, = 78 bars.

*-, 10, € =300

m € = 450 F

LU

"0

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS -an

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.12

(

Orver = 6.1 MPa a, = 51 bars.

ohom.min = 5.1 MPa

PORE PRESS -0 (VADOSE ZONE)

ROCK - TUFF

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - a,•

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-13

(

10

V) w Uj

uJI

rY V) rw

If)

0

ove,. = 8.4 MPa

Uhor.min = 5.4 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

(

o'c = 54 bars.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - an!

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4-14

(

0

LU W VI)

(n "I(i3

0

C (

0'•e, = 8.7 MPa o-, = 55 bars.

O'hor.min = 5.5 MPa


ROCK - TUFF

- 0

Ui€ 450 U)

U)

0- c-.

010 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - ,!

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-15

aver = 20.8 MPa o, = 62 bars.

0'hor.min = 11.1 MPa

PORE PRESS -4.9 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - anf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4-16

/

10

U) U) w a:: H U) a: w I U)

0

(

=ver = 25.5 MPa ac = 53 bars.

4ho.min = 12.0 MPa

PORE PRESS -6.7 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

10

, •€ =450 V) UJI

'I w

Xa: Lii

0- hor,.min.ef 1hor.min. aver.eff Uver

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - Unf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4-17

(

UveT = 20.6 MPa -cr = 37 bars.

Ohor.min = 6.8 MPa

PORE PRESS -3.1 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

10

(A / ,,, 450

Ul

I.

0'hor.min. eff rhommin. aver.eff 0rver

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS -a,

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4-18

/ }\,

(

aver = 25.8 MPa

ahor.min = 11.5 MPa

PORE PRESS -5.6 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

( (

aoc = 59 bars.

10

w -6

LU

-rhomm.min.eff rhomnin. Ttver.eff aver

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS -a,,

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-19

erver 26.3 MPa = 57 bars.

D'ho,.m•n = 11.4 MPa

PORE PRESS -5.7 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

10

(300 V)/ 450 LU

r•

"I- 0

o O7'.mrni.eff hOr•.mn. OUver~efi eveer

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-20

cr, = 15.1 MPa

O'ho,.min = 7.3 MPa

PORE PRESS -3.4 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

a,: = 39 bars.

10! ,, € =300

S( 450 u) w

I

0 - ahomineff 0rhor.min. 4Tver.eff O wer

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS

[MPa]

Mohr representation of in situ stress. Borehole UE-25p#1, depth 731 m. Yucca Mountain.

plate 4.2.5.4-21

/

"a,,, = 21.1 MPa

O'hor.min = 11.1 MPa

PORE PRESS -6.1 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

or, = 50 bars.

Ž 10

-Ju•/• "€0 300 n." = 450

U.1 I- '

0 -r 'o.min.eff Orhor.min. Cver.eff |f' I

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - 0nf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-22

/

(

01,er = 24.3 MPa

o'ho,.rmin = 12.9 MPa

PORE PRESS -7.3 MPa

ROCK - TUFF

a,: = 56 bars.

10=300

"'€ = 450

I.I -r

Orhor.min.eff Urhor.min. Ohvei.ef f 6

ver

0

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS -n,

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-23

(

O'ver = 35.3 MPa

0hor.min = 33.7 MPa

PORE PRESS -11.5 MPa

ROCK - SILURIAN DOLOMITE

a, = 222 bars.

- 10

(30

uj=450 U') £1

w

i')

0-O hor.min.eff a'ver.eff O hor.min.

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS - anf

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4-24

(

0"ver

U•el = 35.6 MPa a= 91 bars.

O'hov.min = 20.7 MPa



-• 10

LU , • =450 (I)

w

0ohref Crhor.,nin. Orver.eff

0 10 20 30

NORMAL STRESS

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-25

ffver

O'ver = 38.8 MPa

ahor.min = 36.5 MPa



or, = 237 bars.

Chormin.eff O0

ver.eff

20

1

30

NORMAL STRESS - ',,

[MPa]


plate 4.2.5.4.-26

(

10-

ui

LU

uj

I-.

[LU

-r

A.

0

I 10

Im

I I i

10001.0

0

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME [MINUTES]

EXPLANATION:

H - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE AT TIME t;

Ho - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE AT THE START OF A TEST;

A - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE DECAY CURVE FOR Ho < a,;

B - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE DECAY CURVE FOR 0 < o- < Ho ; AND

C - HYDRAULIC PRESSURE DECAY CURVE FOR c, -' 0.

Interpretation key for the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests performed in the Yucca Mountain area.

plate 4.2.5.4.-27

1.0

.8

.6

.4

.2

0

10 1000.01 0.1 1

0 5 10 15 KILOMETERS

0 5 MILES

Location of wells where the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests were performed. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4-28

z.

II-

I .

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.!

0..

0.:

0.1

0.1

0

10 100 1000 10.000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t) IN SECONDS

100,000

-- Injection-test data for deptn interval from 811 to 1,829 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-1. From Rush et al., 1983.

plate 4.2.5.4.-29

0 , I T,,,,'I , i i iiimzli i - iT. t I I i, l

66

5

8 06%

7,0 - o. o~*> 50-55 bars

4

3Q 2,,

I

I I I It I I IP. - - -

I.| I I I l'''II

@0.

I I I I

fi = r�

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.1

010 100 1000 10.000

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN SECONDS

-- Injection-test data for depth interval from 926 to 1,829 meters.

' 01e'b1I. I ' 'I 18111

O0

I I I 1 Ill

0 0

0 0

0 S 0

0 0

I . a I. . Il. . . . .. . ..... ......... ........ ......... .........

100 1000 10,000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED tt), IN SECONDS

Injection-test data for deoth interval from 1,200 to 1,829 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-I. From Rush et al., 1983.

plate 4.2.5.4.-30

I I I111lll . I I . IIIf

I I I I I g I

o >50-55

eee0

I I III

ba rs -

100,000

I I I . opt I I

o-, > 50-55 bars

I I1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7 1:.6 ~0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

on

10

I III*

1,000,000100,000

I I [ I ll i i i i i ... . ..

I a ,I I ..I I .l~ I , A I t1|"

I

a i • II . i S . . , ... Alm

j I aIat'' ° I I I I I 1III I 1 1 1 111 M

00" 0 0006 0 0 "1411• ll t I~tS

1.0

0.9

S0.8

0.7

0.5

0.4

- 0.3

< 0.2

0- .1 So

. I . . .i f I i * I a ...i

aI I 1 5-55 b ar ans

o~c > 50-55 bars -

I I , I I tII10 100 1000 10,000 100,000 1.000,000

TI:E AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN SECONDS

-Injection-test data for depth interval from 1,407 to 1.829 meters.

.0 I I a iii ,I; , *, i i i l~ .i ' l , , , , , ,

0.. 1, 1 !1 1 T 11 o

cr > 50-55 bars 8

7

6

S

4

3

2

S !, ,,, .il ,10 , 1 000d I 0 1m00..I I 1 l, 0 100 i000 i•nN ln nn nnn nnn

TTMr AFTEP INJECTION STARTED' (t). IN SECONDSI IUVUUUU

[njection-test data for depth interval from 1,621 to 1,829 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-31

I . I I . off J

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

*t�4

,0

-J I�J - I-J ,.�J

f•

I

0-

1.0

0.9

0.4

0.7

0.4

0.3

0.2

xI 0.1

0

-0.1 1.0 10 00 1000

TIME It), IN MINUIES

-Packer-injection test 3A, depth interval from 649 to 683 meters.

...00. 1.................... ................. 330

2

328

320

324

Packr-ijeciontes

9.deph

iteral

rom1.18

t

Packer-injection test 9, depth interval from 1,118 to 1,152 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-6. From Craig et al., 1983.

10

TIME 114, IN MINUTES

100 1000

plate 4.2.5.4.-32

c- > 27.5 bars0.

0. 0.

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0

.1

N�.

* O 0. i Sc'c > 33 bars

0 0

0 S

0

0

U

! �o.so

4

xi xl �

0.1 1.0

S. . . . . . I. . . . 275

200

100

01

.I

1.V

1.0 10

TIME (t], IN MINUTES100 1,

P'-ker-injection test 10, depth interval from 1,155 to 1,220 metprs.


plate 4.2.5.4.-33

I-

L.

0.,

Ua - 0.7

• 0.'

S.

U" -.

^ C

b 0 000, Lo , > 20 bars

IS

10

•so

0

, , , , , I, I o , , . . . . . . . i . . . . .t-

0.1

J

4

U

0 4l

• . - .. . . ..I. . .

ac > 47 bars

I I I I 11111 a ........... I I I I lilyI I II I I II I

•*4 - • Ooo°

00

0

0 0 9.

0 0

C I

z

z LL 0

I-

I.

LU

"t

4

00 0 0

I

I4 0 4 LU I C-, -J

4 0

I

a a iI I i a I Ima10

l I I I t ill

100

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES

TEST INTERVAL 1006m - 1220m.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#1. From Lahoud et al., 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-34

1.0

0.9

0.8

August 10, 1981 Packer-injection test 6 Transmissivity = 2.1 x 10-2 meter squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 9.8 x 10-6 meter per day

0

S

0

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

m I I J i n I N . . . . . . ..

11000

I I I I I' I'I

! ! ! ! ! 1! 1 i 4 1 I I 1 11

l I I I l l I !471 (n

iJ u-,.

424 ,J

z 377 _; u-I

uJ

330 "J

w

C

283

235

188 0

141 <

94 X

47 <

0 -I

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.5

= 0.4

~-0.3

Sz0.2

S0.1

Iz 010 100 1000

TIME AFTE^ INJEC7ION STARTED (t), IN SECONDS10,000 100,000

-- Injection-test data for depth interval from 687 to 697 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-35

' I I'IIl''I I S *I''III I I I |11111 I #I 1113119 I I *IIII

cc = 500m(H2 0) • .85 Q0

0c = 42.5 bars

* or 0

cc = 55Om(H 2 0) •.85 =

. o•c = 46.7 bars

0

I , | lI~l l . I l I I |" I I Ilt ,I • i ilrql , . . ..a

-J

LU

L-J

w

L)J x

I

03

U,= I-.

z

0.1 1 10 100

TIME it) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES1000


Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-3. From Thordarson et al., 1985.

plate 4.2.5.4.-36

Straight line 550 1 11'" ' I I I I I I t ' 1 - I I

J500 = 240m(H 2 0)

crs = 24 bars S400 -- 4

3 -30

S15.8Q. 15.80io101 t)T = - -"

S 2 00 - As 51.2

= 3 x 10' meter squared per day

z 0

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME (t) AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES

TEST INTERVAL 91 1m - 972m.

Straight line S150 11 1 1 1 1' ' 1 1 1' " F1 I I'" ' I I I''1"

U.1 > 500 - c- = 200m(H 2 0) LU -. 1

Cr. - o-, = 20 bars

400 -

Of 300

200 LU. 15.80 15.8(0.10)

z 100 =3 x to-' meter squared per day

LU



Results of the Cooper- Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-3. From Thordarson et al., 1985.

plate 4.2.5.4.-37

550 LU

uj 500

LU

400

uj 300

0 4

UL 200 LU

LU

z j100

LU x

0.1 1 10 100



0.1 1 10 100



1000


plate 4.2.5.4.-38

0 " 0.01

-A LJ

-J

UJ

Z

LU

I

zJ

LU zu

S00

0 -J -- -o-,:= 175m(H2 0)

,> 400 s > 17.5 bars -u-J

I M 350 zw

. 300

Lw C, 250

(. 9[200 -/

,> >0 0 100

>.O

50

0 F I Ilill| | ! ! . ja lll

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME, IN MINUTES


500 , IIIII1| W * 11 ,11 ,1 1 5 I lili|i I i1111

-J 450 -= 210m(H 20)

Uj.J >400 21 bars l.w-l X 350

. < 300

W C, 250

Q'C 200

'C 14.1 150

00 100 =4'a

50

0 I I I iili p I I III I I l imll p I |II III| l l I I I I I

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES


Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et al., 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-39

0.1 1.0 10

TMUl AFTEI[I MUJECTION STAIITD. IN iNU1S

-Packer-injection test for depth interval froa 790 to 796 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al., 1983.

plate 4.2.5.4.-40

0.9

0.8 F

0.71-

*A ý-

0.5 P"

0.4 --

0.3

0.21--

0.11-

ao = 500m(H2 O) .. 5

o-, = 25 bars

or

a, = 550m(H 20) • 0.5

a, = 27.5 bars

•0

0•

l0o

1.0, . I I I I I . I . . F I- I

ON . . . .... . . . . ..... . ... . . . i i

0.6

0.sj-

- *0000. 0

0

00.7 t-

0.51-

0

cc = 500m(H 2 0) . 0.37

cc = 18.5 bars

0

0.51-

0.4

0.3 ý-

0.2 ý-

or

cc = 550m(H 20) 0.37

cc = 20.3 bars a

0.11-

1 .1

0 S

I *� --

1.0 10 1

TIME AFTER INAICTIONt STAITED. IN MIN•IES

-Packer injection test for depth interval from 815 to 834 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-5. From Bentley et al, 1983.

plate 4.2.5.4.-41

00• . . . . ..... I T I B I B BIB wmR

I

I * I

00 0% 0

1.€

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

a, = 500m(H 20) . 0.35

c-, = 17.5 bars

or

ac = 550m(H 2 0) - 0.35

ac = 19.2

a 90

0

S S

0 0

1.0 10 190

TIeE AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES

•-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 949 to 1,010 meters.

1.0 10 00

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test for depth interval form 1,015 to 1,033 meters (first test).


00

0

**/

0g. • @e00

0.1 100

0 0

0

0

0

0 xo

0

0

0

.0 0

0a, = 500m(H 2 0) 0.42

c = 21 bars

.7 or

. o-, = 550m(H 2 0) • 0.42

".5-/ o = 23 bars

.4 0

0

.3

.2 0

,4.

0.1

plate 4.2.5.4-42

I1000

1.0 10 100

TIME AFTER INJECTION STAr1rED. IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test for depth interval from 1,052 to 1,219 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-43

1.0

0.$

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.6

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

o-, = 500m(H 2 0) 0.45

S d*a = 22.5 bars

or

0-c = 55Om(H 20) 0.45

o-,c = 24.7 bars

/

S

S. . .. I . . . . . . . I 0

•.• .. . . ... . . z i i a i a i z v m i I I I R I

*. . . .. ... - I. . . . ...... ni

0.9

0.3

" • 0.7

" o.s

0.1

0

0.1 1.0 10

TIME (, IN WNUIS

0 0o0 400m(H 20)

0 •/o-: 40 bars

o0@.

00 0.00

00 00

00

00

@ @@0

@o0

0@Q

%

S

0

lo0

-Packer-injection test 3, depth interval from 649 to 683 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-44

'00o

4M

100

01

l.a1 .111

0.7

0.5 - 0.7

So.

0.2

0.1

0

-0.''

xl

we

I

10o

+!

100

6 = 200m(H 20)

• • 0c = 20 bars

Oee

seeee

i*eft

0.1 1, 10 10 100

TIME (ti, IN MINUTES

-Packer-injection test 7. depth interval from 835 to 869 meters.

1.0 . . . ..

0.1 1.0 1I0 TIME (ti. IN MINJUTE

I IS

200

I0'

13 ,,o ,,+

10

O0j

1000

Packer-injection test 8, depth interval from 871 to 1,220 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-45

0

... . .I " *' ''... I . . .. I . . .

0.9 6 = 150m(H 20) 0.0 so*a, 15 bars 0 0

0.8 0•00

0.4 •

0,.2 • 0.1 7

0

0.41 - 0 . . 1 ,

I I I

I

z 0

LU

2z: 90

C! <0

?.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

10 100 1000

I f Ii I I 1 1I i I I I I II

May 10, 1981

Packer-injection test 3 Transmissivity = 5.5 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity - 5.4 x 10.1 meter per day 4

*Approximate values

% •rc =96 re(H 20 )

k e'c 9.6 bars

0%

I saw 0 t l i lI n J n~

0=


TEST INTERVAL477m. - 579m.


plate 4.2.5.4-46

477 v)

429 z

382.

286 Y

239 4

191 L 0

00

48

0

0.5

1.0

0

z 0 U, LU n

z

0 I

LU I

U) _J D cc

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

010 100

I I 1 1111 1 1 I I I I II1 I I I11

-- August 12, 1981 Packer-injection test 10

,- Transmissivity = 9.9 x 10-2 meter squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 2.5 x 10-3 meter per day

--, = 180m(H 2 0)

c-, = 18 bars

%

I I I I ItI Il I I I I ~I t I I I I I I,

100TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It), IN MINUTES


Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#l. From Lahoud et al., 1983.

plate 4.2.5.4.-47

LU

X Y 4J

477 U) cc

429 z

381 J LU

Lu 334 M

238 U

191 > 0

143

UJ

48<

001

1.0 10

TW AFTER INJECTION STARTED 14, IN MINUTES

-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 792 to 838 meters.

6"

0.0

0,8

0.7

OA

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

' 0 100

1.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 111 I 1 1 1 11l

0.9 - = 180m(H 2 O)

0A - = 18 bars 47

0.7

0.8 5 328

O.S

0.6

0.4 ?/ . 218

0.3 0

0.2 - 109)

0 0

1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED III. IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test for depth interval from 802 to 826 meters (first test).

100

Z

I

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley (1984).

plate 4.2.5.4.-48

1I

I 8

4

I I I

I I I lull.II I I I1 I 11 |1I I I |I I | II

cc = 190m(H2 O)

• ~'c = 19 bars

0t "0(

0 I I II I I I I ll• J I I

437

328

5s..I9

-3

U

I I

4

Ir z

L)

x.

4.1

Z 1.0 ' ' ' ' 1 ' l ' '

OD • 0.9

Z 1.0 rc, 1.0(0.03101 Type curve t 1.1311 day per 1440 minutes)

LU 0.7 - for a•=10n= 1.2 meters squared per day Z S 0.6

S. rc W00310)'(10.44 < -.5- c S - a 4 - x 1V" S0.2

>" rez '0.1498)'

LU• _. 0.4

3ý 0.3 0 LU0.

S0.2 E SINGULAR" POINT

0

0.1 1 10 100 1000




plate 4.2.5.4.-49

10,000

500 * 111111 1 *, ,,*- 11w I II *, *I , , ,,,,

450

400 - o

2 C 350 "SINGULAR" POINT

. 300

wJ o 250 S:• 0 < 200

< U 150

0 0 100 >-CO

50so

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4-50

0 -J

U 4 0J "SINGULAR" POINT

I M 350 z UJ

. 300

U. 250

0 < 200 Co

41 LU 150 M >

>00 100

5o

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES

TEST INTERVAL 703m. - 735m.

500 * I * * mlI * I * 1 * ' ,,,

O J450 -_

w_ > 400 "SINGULAR" POINT I-w

2 M 350

* •300

W (j 250

x :> (J 200

41 L 150

0 0 100

so-m

50

0 1 a I Iliadl aIi a a!11111 1 1 at IIIIII

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-51

Soo ! I I IfwllI| I I Itllif| I I I lIl; III I I I [[III I I I fill;

450 -- 0 cUJ

W> 400 "SINGULAR" POINT Wa

W -J 2 W 350 z w

AI. 300

UJ r~j250

• 200

SI150n>

0• 0 100 >'Ca

50 I

0 so

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME. IN MINUTES TEST INTERVAL 783m - 832m.

500 1111t immiii., minimu i m ii .. miim 1,11 1 fi illm

-- 450 c- 0

S400 "SINGULAR" POINT

(C 350 z P~

. 300

W 250

om 200

Ow 150

00 100

50

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 TIME, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-52

CC- UJ

S> 400 - "SINGULAR" POINT I.; - 3L0

S0 2350

*� 300

wo ( 250

C0)< 200

C LU 150

00 100so-

0

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME, IN MINUTES


500 I iv1III| I I iiii | I ItIII wI I I vi vo, I I v onui

450 -- o'c "--4 0

(O J 450 - -- + - 4"SINGULAR" POINT LU>400.UJ

LU -J

2 CC 350 LU

- I-< 300 -

wo . 250

Q< 200

w 150 Ix > 00 100 >-CO

50F

0 1 1 A 1 I 1 1 1 J l l ll l I I I I i ll] I tI I 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-53

M-UJI uJ > wE-J ZUJ

C*e

e,(

4Cwo

00

Ct)-J

, u) UJ->

"oO

"-IlJ -,

>.

0.1

I1 i l i 10 i il | I I l l| I I l l l

1 10

TIME, IN MINUTES


100

1000

1000


plate 4.2.5.4.-54

1 10

TIME, IN MINUTES


500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

0.01

F I I 111111 I lv 111111 I I I I CliFf I F I I 11111 I 5

1 I0 t t

"SINGULAR" POINT

I I I IIII

I I I I III|

I I a Il lid

500

450 S• o~~dc --•O •W

L > 400 "SINGULAR" POINT I-wJ

2 CC 350

z1< 300

uJ wj 250

0 < 200

< IwJ 150

00 100

50

01 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME, IN MINUTES


500 ' .11 11 Illll ' 'I *Il, I iill I *ll * I Ii5

450 -- c 0

UI > 400 - "SINGULAR" POINT I -LU

2 M 350

*( e300

IJ 250

0. 200

SI150 -> 0) 0 100 >-Co

50

0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

TIME, IN MINUTES


Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW H-4. From Whitfield et aL., 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-55

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0 0.0

1 10 1001 10 100

TIME, IN MINUTES


1000


plate 4.2.5.4-56

l-IW

SzJ

w o z L,

LU

00

0.1

I I # I will I IIIIfill I II IIij I III I poI I I I 1111

0-* 0

"SINGULAR" POINT

S iSa il II ll i....i.........i ...... i.. .... .... . .. ..

1i m m mmJmlm E I I i 11111 I I I IIIIII I I I Illll

0.9 I.-

1.0 10 14

TIE AFTER INJ.-CTIN STARTED. IN MINUTES

•Packer-injection test for depth interval from 796 to 815 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-57

V 0

0.g

0.5

0.4 -

0.2 ý-

0.1 ý-

0.1

I.U . - . I . I I __ - I .. . . .. . . .

U.U . . . .... m . . . . .... . . . . . . . ..

"SINGULAR" POINT

0. . . . O . .

0.8 ý-

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2 I-

0.1 F_

-- 1.

1.0 10 1' TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES

-Packer-inJection test for depth interval from 887 to 947 meters.

*1 , • ,, • ',, , , , ,

* "SINGULAR" POIN

0i

. . ., 0 . . . ".Op , ,

1.0 10 1

TM AFTER INJECTION STARTED. IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-58

1.0

IT

0,8 •"SINGULAR" POINT

0.7 S

0.9

Oh•

0.4

0.3

0.2 0.1

0,1

0.3' , , , ,, | , ' O " a ,, A ,,

O.1

1.0

0.9

1.0

1.0 10 1"

TIM AFM I"JCnTCOW STAUr . IN MW4U1U

-Packer injection test for depth interval from 1.033 to 1,052 amters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-59

0.0

0.7

0.8

0.3.

• 'SINGULAR" POINT

0 ~ . . . T • • I . .A .

0.1 ý

0.1

U~

i~ . . .I• ' . . ' . . . I . 331 531

0601

"SINGULAR" POINT -4C

0.4

0.30

02.

00 , 20 a 0 0 , 0 00

0.. . ... . ..... - 0 00

-a.0,1 1.0 10

TIME (1g, IN MINHUJ"S1 1

I Ci 4

I 2

I1iM



plate 4.2.5.4-60

10 TIME (t, IN MINUTES

-- Packer-injection test 5, depth interval from 753 to 787 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-61

1.�I

2

ii

S4

.. 0'.. -- 0

0.7

0. S0.5

0.4 S

0.0

0.2

0.1 0

0 ...

0I0.....

-I 400

30

206

IM0.1 1.0

G.m

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0 I

_z

I-

U,

9.-

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

1.0

0.9 I-

0.8 H

0.7 I-

0.6 H

0.4k

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

10 0- Now 10(


TEST INTERVAL514m - 579m.

10 100 1000

I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1I1111 1 I 1I 1 1111

May 9, 1981 Packer-injection test 1 Transmissivity = 4.9 x 100 meters squared per day Hydrologic conductivity = 7.6 x 10.2 meter per day

0

"SINGULAR" POINT

I I I I I ..1 .... i ...k i& .LII _ t I I I lI I i

474 U,

LU I-

424

z 329.-j

uJ

Lu

332 -J cu

284

237 '" 9

C,, 190 L 0

142 U.1

95 .-J

47 <

0




plate 4.2.5.4.-62

II

9--0.5

476 ci cr

429 L z

381 w ELu

333 -J

Lu I

286

238

I

190 > 0

143

95

48 cc U

^0 "

I

Lu

I4 C 4 Lu I C-)

-I

4 C

I

z 0

z

0

i.

LU

75

I

I-

I I I I I I III I I I I I I I II I I I I I II I

May 9, 1981 Packer-injection test 2 Transmissivity = 2.7 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity= 3.6 x 10"2 meter per day

"SINGULAR" POINT

0I

•O

*0.

I I .I I eA.• -- k_,_J l I I Ii I I I I I I II

I I a I I EiIIIIN is a - 8-MIM 0

l

0.5 ý-

1

1.0

I

LU

4 0 4 LU I U -J

4 0

I

z 0

I,-.

LU

LL

0

I,,

U,

-r

0.9

0.8

0.7

0'6 F

0.5

0.4 I

0.3 1

0.2 1

0.1

10 100

I I II I I IIII I I I I ll I I I I I I I

- August 10, 1981 Packer-injection test 7 Transmissivity = 4.9 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 1.1 x 10' meter per day*

*Approximate values

ayc -- 0

"SINGULAR" POINT

1000

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It), IN MINUTES


1.0

z 0

LUI

04

II-

-,<,

Cr.

"I-

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

010 100 1000

477 Y, cc LU I-.

429 z

381 _

LU 334 cc

LU

286 Y

238

191 0

143

LU 95 "

,_J

48

0




plate 4.2.5.4.-63

475 uV

LU

428

333 -J

285~

238 4

.I

.,,

190 w

143

484

000

I I I 1 11I 1 I F 11111t1 I I I 11I 11

August 11, 1981 Packer-injection test 8

- Transmissivity = 1.3 x 101 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 3.3 x 110' meter per day4

*Approximate values

0

"SINGULAR" POINT

00

0 %

16

I I I t I I I I I

0 L 1

d •

1.0

z

UJZ

U..%

0

LU,,,

""z

'-

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0100 100

-- August 12, 1981 Packer-injection test 9 Transmissivity = 3.9 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 9.9 x 10.1 meter per day

*Approximate values

ac --* 0

"SINGULAR" POINT

aIL t I

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t0, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-64

'476 (n 429

z 381

333 -J

286

238 ,

191 > 0

143 <

95 X

48

0J10

A0

z

z 0

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

010 100




I I I I I I III I I I I I I I |I I 1 I Ir i

August 13, 1961 Packer-injection test 12 Transmissivity = 3.7 x 10' meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity a 9.2 x 10.1 meter per day 4

_ Approximate values

"SINGULAR" POINT

C. Ielk• J zi ,l I I miaaiI I I Illil1

1000

plate 4.2.5.4.-65

476 Y) cc

42B z

381 -i Lu

333 -J cu

I.

286

238

U,.

190 0

143

96

48

0 0I

0 * * , ,

Hoz 388 meters

07c - 0

0"SINGULAR" POINT (?)

0 S

0

S1 0 0.8

0.7

z 07 0

L 0.6

L& 0 0.5

~Lu 4'1

>IF 0.2

0.1

01

0

0

0

1.0 10 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, W, IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 2, depth interval from 500 to 550 meters.

_A 11

0.1 1.0 to 10D 1000

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES


Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5 4.-66

0.9 a-

S

0

I-_

1000

to cc ILU

z -J uJ LU

-

LU

0

I

- 00~ UJ

I_

I

0

0

0.1

1.0

Iý 0 0.8

Z 0.7 0 I-. - 0.6

LA.

0 o0

0.4

14 -J 0.3

i01 D

0

* 0eO

*0600-+

"SNUAR ON

- • • •0

I, U

En cc I.LU 300

z -LJ LU

LU

I-

.-[200

0

to

U, uJ

0 100

cr,

0

4.

0 >-

-- 0 T 1 . i I I . I I I . I I I . . I I ý i i I l i i . i ý . ýI

0

Ho = 386 meters

0

0

S

LT, - 0

"SINGULAR" POINT

0 0 0 0 0 a

10 I i i10 I I I i 100I& l A1.0 10 1 ;_

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. (0, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-67

0

0

Ho0= 385 meoers J3 z

0 -J

"SINGULAR" POINT "

00 4 41

o cc

0 -1 1000

S _4

I

1 0 10 100 1000

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It), IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 11, depth interval from 974 to 1,044 meters.

0.7

u, 0.6

-JI< 0.3

012 < 04

0.2

0.9s

0,-!i 0o.8

Z 0.7

LL.

01

0

U

.-J< 023

01

0

0

F-

I-

L+ -4 300 Z

z

UJ L-A

<

U,

0 I i.

-J

D 0r

_J

1000

-01 1 01

I

a

. &

a

4 '.1

4 a

U

w I -C I4

a 4

0

0

0

0

0.1 1.0 lo lO 10 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It). IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test for depth interval from 702 to 747 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well USW G-4. From Bentley, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-68

1.0 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1i ll 1 I 1 1 1 1 1

0.I

0,4

0.7 --*

"SINGULAR" POINT 0.6 -

.4

'.3

.2

.1 C

o I I I II l I I ? ???0re.e * .e.a jili

16"

437

328

21>

109

r . *� *�... .. **....* I I lull

a, -- + 0

"SINGULAR" POINT0

0

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

x

x

0

0 J l

1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t). IN MINUTES


I I I I l l

1.4.1 I I I lilly

1.0 10

TIM AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4-69

0

0

0

434w

327w

218 1

1000.1

E

0

4 *�1

U

4

a

z

0.1

0.8

0.7

0.5

OA3

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

U

I I

4 a 4

I I I PhI I

.- c 0

"SINGULAR" POINT0

0

0

0

0

a

0 I I I 1111,. )1 I I I I I

,I , * '. *m I I * , i ll

-- 438

323

213

109

0 1000.1

I I I I.I I I I I I Ia . . . . . w m B A i I

S. . . . . . . i e I I I • g I I ff g I I I I I I I I

S. . . . , • • , . I • I I I I I I

I l I l I m a m,

JIvivrr

6

I I I I I I I I

,c -- 0

"SINGULAR" POINT

0

0

0

0

0.8

0.7

0.4

o.h

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

a

I I I I 1 11I

0

0 I I *�iI 1.11

,a 0

I

1.0 10

TIM AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t), IN MINUTES

"Packer-injection test for depth interval from 899 to 915 meters.

437

z

328

218

=a

4 x

J0 O0


plate 4.2.5.4-70

1.1

0.i

I I I I liii

0

0.1M ....... • . ..........

D e • e l I I II

I,

wE-l

CO

<UJ>

crr

zwL

wo

00

S00

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

5o

0 0.0

................................. i I S * *5I*EI�

I 0.1

1_10

1 10

TIME, IN MINUTES


100 1000


plate 4.2.5.4.-71

0

*6 0

0 0

0

09

0

0

0

0

0

S 0

0 S

0 0

00*

1.0 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, IN MINUTES

Packer-injection teat for depth interval from 834 to 895 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-72

U1.0

0.9

0*.

0

0.7 ý,

0.$I-

10.4

0.3 ý-

0.2

0.1

e.0L , ,0.1

00

0

.

II I

. . . !

0.1 1.0 O tOO TIME AFTER INJECTION STAWTT, IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test for depth interval from 1,015 to 1,033 meters (second test).


plate 4.2.5.4.-73

0.9

0.8

0.7 0

0..

0.$

0.4

00

0.3 0

0= 0

0.2

0.1

0•

0.o 0.. .I , , , . . . O .

n+0

0.8

* 400

00.7 -1

0.0 U3002

0.6

9 0N 0M

0- 200

1 0.2 -100

0 *** 0e **00,,0 o

"-0.' . . . . *, i , I . 1, , I s a n |

0.1 1. 01010000

TiME 14, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-74

S~~~............. ..... '.....I... 1...

• •Q •0 *001

0e.

0

1.0

0.9

0.8

C•., 0.7

0.4

0.6

0.4

'x 0.3

0.2

0.1 0

0

0

S 6

0 000

.1 * .110

TIME It). IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-75

0 0

6 0 0

0.1

W2

400

300

200

100

aONes1.0 100

1.0

0.9

0.4

0.7

- 0.2

" X 0.1

0

0.1 1.0 10

TIME (t), IN MINUTES

.. .me

100

am

I

400

(8

300 U

200

100

ci1000

-Packer-injection test 6. depth interval from 804 to 838 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4 -76

*e..

0* I *0.

0°•oo

• , . , , . ,.0. . . . .t . . . .

•UI . . . .... i . . . ... . . . . . .... J l J B J I

10 100TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED Wti, IN MINUTES


1.0

0

U<

>

cZ

th

'UC'

c0

Xw

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

I I I I 1 iI I I itI i I I a a1I

May 11, 1981 Packer-injection test 4 Transmissivity = 6.9 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity =4.9 x 10- meter per day

? 0

%% #gol* 0•

0 le•

0el

S. OS.t

0l

0e

10 100 100

473 Uv cc UJ I.

426 u z

379 .J LU

331 1J

284~

237 I-U,

189w 0

142 4

95 -. J

47 <

0




plate 4.2.5.4.-77

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0

0

Fz

1-. 0 U,

c

0. >'"

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.5

uJ

LU

z U> 4I

I I I I III, I I t1II1II I I 11 1I

- May 12, 1981 Packer-injection test 5 Transmissivity = 1.7 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 1.2 x 10"Y meter per day

%S Sl%

I I I I l till I ".P gibeq I I I I

477 V) Occ

429w z

382 -i

o

w

334 -J

U

239

191 0

143

48

,0

PU

0.1

0

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

010 100



1C

, i' | ! I I I II I I11 1 I I I 11 1

- August 13, 1961 Packer-injection test 11

- Transmiuivity =1.8 x 10.1 meter squared per day Hydraulic conductivity =4.6 x 10.1 meter Per day

o0

m • 0 \ D 0

0m

0 0w

I I 1 I I | I I I I I I I.

Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25b#l. From Lahoud et al., 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4-78

I

LU

II.4 C 4 LU I 0

-a 4 0

I

z 0

I.0 0-

476

429

381

333

286

238

191

143

-95

48

0 ]00

C",

z

Lu -i

'I, r,,

LUJ

w

I-,

.-1

4 Q1

u U I I i I I . .. . . .I I . I

August 13, 1981 Packer-injection test 13 Transrnissivity = 1.4 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 3.5 x 10-1 meter per day

z

0

z U.

05 D-

I.

LU

I-

10 100 10C

1.0

A U



10 100J

1 00

476 v) eJ LU

428 z

381 -f UJ

333 UJ

286

238

190 L 0

143

<U 95 I

C-,

48 4

0

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED Qt), IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-79

0.9 I-

u u , , u u I

0.8 F_

0.7 -

0.6 F-

0.5 1-

0.4 h

0.3

0.2 I- S

i miamI m5m . a mmmii

- go

0.1

1.0

I

LU

I

4 0 4 LU I C-) -J

4 0

I

0

IL

0 LJ .z

'a

0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

I I I fill11 I I I 11I1 I I I I!

- August 13, 1981 Packer-injection test 14

- Transmiseivity =2.1 x 100 meters squared per day Hydraulic conductivity = 5.3 x 10"2 meter per day

1 6.

S?

%'o.

iiiiall I °ioL..ukI I I n i i1110

w I I I I I I ? 477 Y)~ tU

429 z

381 Uj

w LU

33W LU

286

CO)

14

LU 191

143 0

0 !

.A1

S C Ho- 388 meters

0

S

0

6

0

0

X10 0.0

Z 07

•I-•

-,-l<l _Yio

JI-C 0.

>-- 0.2

0.1

0 0 S

* 0

1+0 10 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, WI, IN MINUTES


HO = 389 meters0

S

S

a

0

0 9

0 0

0 00 0 *

1.0 to 100 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, 1t0, IN MINUTES



plate 4.2.5.4.-80

0.9 0 * * See.

0

-01 0.1

0.9 S

0 In

UJ

300 Z

_z -J

I-,<

-200 3:

I-

I.

0

LU

J

"Cr

0

Z 0.7

S0.5 04

X<i_

1•< 0:3 I

-Ja 0.2

:040

0

0.1

I'

3W I-l

z

-J

_J -J

2W

I

I-.

S0

-Jo1 <

U

-'J

01 >

1000

U1^1.

I

CLU

UJ4

U2

2'

D4

0.1 1.0 10 100

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (I, IN MINUTES


I I I I I I I ' I I , , , I,

S S.

0Ho= 386 meters0•

0

0

0

0

a

0

0

0

I -�

nU

ILU

z

-S LU

I

200

LU

, 100

" "0 >

"4 LU [i

01 1.0 10 100 1000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. (t), IN MINUTES


Results of the Cooper-Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#l. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-81

1 .0 ' I . . .

03- 000

O0.8 S S Ho= 388 meters

S0-7 0

£0.6 S

0

-0.1

LU c

UJ

z

_J

cc

UJ 2-

LU

I-

200

to

LU

x

I'

U 0 "

cc

0

0 *0

1.0

0.9

i 0 0.8

Z 0.7 0

LU 0.1

04

U'

0.3 4I

.0t

* 4 ,

1.0 10 100

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It(, IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 6, 'lepth interval from 690 to 740 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-82

0.9 00.* *** 0

0.8 S0 Ho= 37 rnmeors

O07 -

0.6

0 0.4

-J 4 .3

'us

0.2

0.1

0

0.1

.0

1000

(1) Cc

LU 30

La z

-J

2w

U,

-J La

I

I

Co

D

0

I00

100

,-I

0 >"I

1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (0, IN METERS

Packer-injection test 15, depth interval from 1,297

100

to 1,308 meters.

O0 g

• O S5mtr

0

0

1.0 10 100

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN METERS



plate 4.2.5.4.-83

1.

0.

z 0 o.

I

0 . I0.

x )0.

D

'(<0.

>Iu

-0.0.1

0.9 F-

.0j . . ... I ' ',' ' ,'' '' { . . ... I * . . .

.8 ••Ho . 366 meters 7 - 1) I "

F 0

66

4

3S

2 5

0 Of 0

I ''* * .* ' I I ,,, A,,,,I , , ,, , . iI , ,,,,,

_z

..J -~i

Lu

-J Lu

0

1 Y

_

cc

0

1004

0 0.8

x

00.7

. 0.6

~LA_ i0

4 0.5 0 0.4

S 0.3 U

0.

0.1

0

Ui

LU

I-

z

40

200 "I'..,

X

0 > "1 "

-01 L 0.1

I . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .

-I . I I T 7_7

0.o9- Ho- 37 mews U),

z

IQD0.7- I --L

U.U

01 200

0.0 wZ 06'-LU

05~0 icn

x 0.2 4 LU

Do 0

x

0.11

I . 0 ,•

0 >

-01*

0.1 10 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It), IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 17, depth interval from 1 ,341 to 1,.381 meters.

1.0

0.9- Ho 367motorsU

* LUJ

•'r i •00•

X0 0. -30 LU

0.7 -. S0.8- -LU

U _J

Oe 2W00

0.0

LU 0.4 t5

0< LU.J1

ccE 100<

>_0 .10

0 >

0.

Packer-injection test 18, depth interval from 1,381 to 1,421 meters

Results of the Cooper- Breclehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-84

1,0t I I I 1 I I I

Ho 357 mews

X II M 0 . 8 -4 3 0

0.7 1- w

0Z 0.6

0.5

~~Jo

1004

4 0 .0-_ TIME AFE NETO TRTD tI IUE

• 10

t !00

10 0.28- 0 00

iZ 0.6 l

100

I0.8- * 30o

_ >w

-I-0

=1•°o..,.. -=,-00

Ze0.6t- C ig 0 < .0. <cnI-. 0-

0

z- • 02-- w.

0 -t

-- 0 1 4 I l i ' ; , I •

0' 10 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, ItI, IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 20, deoth interval from 1,463 to 1 ,509 meters.

Results of the Cooper-Bredlehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-85

0.9• Ho= 367 meters

=z z 0o.7 - • ,

0 200

00.3 CC~- x2004<

°I- " -o

cc 4

0 U

> 0.1 l' 0

0.1 to 10

TIME AIFTER INJECTION STARTED, (t), IN MINUTES


o.9.- Ho -38 meters

~u,6u

0.84 300

12 0.7- L . i > Sw

n I _J

0 -i 200 <

0.5 30 Si U)

U LU

=u 0 >

S0.2- .

S~z•L

-01"I 0 0 -010

01 1.0 10 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, 1. IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 22, deoth interval from 1,558 to 1,805 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-86

¶0 094- Ho=36Omeiers i

0.7-- U

LU LO0.- •LU

<0- -30cc

9 -z

z 1

0 1I

-0 1

01* 1.001



1.0..

0.9- Ho- 367 motors

U,

0 ?

ZD 0.'

U .

-0<

01100

0.2

Z 017

0 -0 01- 0 0 - 0 >"

01 0 ' 0

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, It), IN MINUTES


Results of the Cooper- Bredehoeft injection tests in Well UE-25p#l. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-87

1.01

HO =369 meters

LU

0.8 -- 300

2 Z

0.7- S

LU

wL 0.6

10 -2004

0.5

0.4

-J >

lo ,,• 100 •

X , 02- L

i UJr >- 0.1

0'- 0 0-0 >" x

-0 1 01 10 10



10. II

0.9- Ho 368 meters .

LU SI°o8 . 0 t

~0.8 * 300~

zS Z 0.7-- • u,

Uu

-J

<. -I

L--

01' 0-200

TIEAFE NJCIN TRTD 4 NMIUE

'- er-i0 0

2-r

zU 0.L

0.3 01

02C

0'- * o >

-0.1 01 10 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED. (t), IN MINUTES

Dacker-injection test 26, depth interval from 1,643 to 1,689 meters.

Results of the Cooper- Bredehoeft injection tests In Well UE-25p#1. From Craig and Johnson, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4.-88

1.0 0L /O3811r 0.9 Ho. 3W motors

x ? 0.7

,z 0 6

LL.

0 • 0 "

0.2 " >_ 0.1

0 - -0

0.1 -o 10


Packer-injection test 27, depth interval from 1,689 to 1,735 meters

10

09- Ho 368 neters

zz UJ

ULU

,0 0-200

x 0.4

0.3- 0 X 100u

0 2

z ~ 02-LU4

00

•01

0 4:

0-- oO -- 0 >"

-01 01 10 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (fl, IN MINUTES

Packer-injection test 28, depth interval from 1 ,735 to 1 ,781 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-89

l.�rI I I

as O-

x 0.8

z S0.7

UJ

z 05.

0.4

S 0.3

X 0.2

0.

0

-0.1

0

S 0

0 0

Ho = 368 meters

0

0

0 0

Un

z -J U,

UJ

F

I

a,

0 Co 100

4 w

-J

cc

0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED, (W, IN METERS



plate 4.2.5.4-90

I I I I I i i i • I i I I ] I I i I I . . . . . . .

I-

I-

N 4

e

I 4

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

1.0 70

TIME AFTER INACTION STARTM (a. IN MINUTES

0 0

0 0

((H 1111111 I I I 111117

•Packer-injection test for depth interval from 698 to 722 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-91

436

327 j;

211

o

IJI 1 | I I , . , ,l I I I I I I I If I I I . . . . . . .

Q . . . . . .... . . . . ..... . . A i g L B I

0.1

S.

S.

S.

0.

0,

0.

0.

0. 0.:

S

.7

1,1 1 1 1| 111 1 . .I ISI1,•

0.1 1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED It). IN MINUTES


1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED III. IN MINUTES

1I

100

437

215

109

0

644

43 _z

218

109



plate 4.2.5.4.-92

.4 - %

.3 C

0 I 1 I I 1 til I I 1 1 II 1 1 1 I_ 0 1 1 -1_I111

IU

4 a 4 z

'a

X

I. I I I 1111]1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I III I 1 I I I rii

I..

0.7

1.0

40

0.4

0.1 0

II I

0 I I I I 111 1L I I 111 11 J *? e• 446j.~J-|. . I I !111

m g I I g I I I I I ! ! I I I el

1.0 10


Packer-injection test for depth 722 to 747 meters.

1.0 I45

0.9

0.8 436

0.7 0

0

0.8 327

0.5 0

0.4 218

0.3 0

0.2 109

0 0,1 0

0.10

0 00 *A-11 I II III ~ 1 . I I I0.1 1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (I). IN MINUTES

100

I a

5!

"-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 747 to 792 meters.


plate 4.2.5.4.-93

x 0

4

I a(0

4

4 a

'.V

0.9

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

I

(.0

4 a 4 I

I I I Jill! II Fill I I I I I III1 1 f I I III

0

00

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0I I I 11111,

644

437

I 328

218

100

1 0 00

interval from

0.1

I a a

U'

I U

4

4 a 4 I

I

I IU

w 4 a 4

13 •

0I i i i Il a I I J I I l I I I 1 A .I I I 1I1

I

| I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ITI

0.1 1.0 10 100

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t3. IN MINUTES

-Packer-injection test for depth interval from 802 to 826 meters (second test).

10__

0.

0.

0.

0.4

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.1 1.0 10

TIME AFTER INJECTION STARTED (t. IN MINUTES


437

I 2

218

00


plate 4.2.5.4-94

U

w II4 a 4

].i 1| I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 II l

0.S

0.8

0,7 a

C

0.6 a 229

OA4• 162

0.3

0.2 is

0.

o.1 0

04 0 a J l I 152I ~ . .I I I

I U

I 4 a 4

- i i I I i ii i f i f i i ii i i 1 i i

9

ee

e

4 a

.3

.2 -

S .

ae

0I I 0 I I J J I I [ I ~ e - I I l I I

I

I

I

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

Stress Borehole Depth o- C Conditions

G-1 646 35 LE G-1 792 50 nLE G-1 945 54 LE G-1 1038 61 nLE G-1 1218 58 LE G-1 1288 78 nLE

G-2 295 51 nLE G-2 418 54 nLE G-2 432 55 nLE G-2 1026 62 nLE G-2 1209 53 LE

G-3 1074 37 LE G-3 1338 59 LE G-3 1356 57 LE

UE-25p#1 731 39 LE UE-25p#1 1001 50 LE UE-25p#1 1131 56 LE UE-25p#1 1564 222 nLE UE-25p#1 1573 91 nLE UE-25p#1 1693 237 nLE

SLUG TESTSII- I

"SINGULAR" POINTS

Borehole Depth o c

USW H-3 1 792

Borehole Depth o- c

USW H-1 692 42.5

USW H-3 884 25 USW H-3 941 24 USW H-3 1093 20 USW H-3 1172 33

USW H-4 579 17.5 USW H-4 628 21

USW H-5 793 27.5 USW H-5 823 20 USW H-5 979 19 USW H-5 1024 23 USW H-5 1135 25

USW H-6 666 40 USW H-6 852 20 USW H-6 1045 15

UE-25b#1 528 9.6 UE-25b#1 763 18

USW G-4 815 19 USW G-4 814 18

652 703 735 783 832 855 873 892 910 928 1173 1195

796 887 888

1033

USW H-6 606 USW H-6 753

UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1 UE-25b#1

UE-25p#1 UE-25p#1 UE-25p#1 UE-25p#1

USW G-4 USW G-4 USW G-4

514 505 792 820 779 581

550 600 974 1044

702 850 875

0

State of in situ stress. Summary. Yucca Mountain.

Plate 4.2.5.4.-95

USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4 USW H-4

USW H-5 USW H-5 USW H-5 USW H-5

. - . -

I I I I I100 CLOSURE PRESS-•

II [bars]

0

0

PORE PRESS - p

A&

A

A&

AA

LE

A0

ALE

DEPTH

2

AA

A

LE At

00

fjWATER TABLE

"OVERPRESSURE"; -p = 20-55m ROBISON, 1984 AND ROBISON et al., 1988.

(/ Ap, =?

HYDROLOGIC SETTING

LE 0,oe LE \

LE

LE/ /

EXPLANAT!ON:

* - o•, BASED ON HYDROFRACTURE

LE /- "LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM"

A - o-, BASED ON SLUG TESTS

State of in situ stress. Summary. Yucca Mountain.

plate 4.2.5.4-96

0

0 �1

500 -

1000-

0

1500

E

I-

Lu

222

237

PI .2 T30 1W 25'

WTUGEXM.ANATIOFA US'w -2 129.4ALLUVIUM

: QUATEANA

100

= 52"30" - - :73.5 "IOW numb.

SCONTOUR-

i~~~~i' w•2 •I R )olf Aur"

bflfude Of 00

Smetrl s urted c, : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to 111ii ii!i46isii- 51

Montors &Wter S -W- PmENTwI. S

Dattiume of PC

1-~~~~t25 WYM Pieteste

t?:.!.... 7274 otrs •is

USWUS WG--4•

,7729.3

: :!i: • • UUE$ W5

729.3)

36e470' •0" '

~ \7310.4

o 1 2 3 KILOMETERS

o 1 2 MILES

Location map for in situ stress cross-sections. Yucca Mountain. Modified from Robison, 1984.

plate 4.2.5.4-97

S..... .. M.o

(

'L-

2000

1000 _

7

z 0

w

-J

0

-1000

* sp • sp

* LE-50 SP LE-p

* LE-56

U*) (n) ::3 n

I I I II

.10 I LE-35 sp

sp J sp 1.42 1 nLE-50 / 18 I" l 08

1 19 sp I osp sp _L sp I LE-54

> 47

*nLE-222

* nLE-91

* nLE-237

I -r nLE-61

"- - I I LE-58

S I I . nLE-78 I I I II I I I I I

53

EXPLANATION:

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING LE-60 - LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, a, [bars]; nLE-70 - NO LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, a,, [bars];

INJECTION TESTS I18 - a. [bars]; SP - SINGULAR POINT a• - 0;

- CLOSURE PRESSURE; * - OVERPRESSURE.

2 3 4

In situ stress field NW-SE cross-section. Yucca Mountain.

-1000

5 DISTANCE [miles]

plate 4.2.5.4.-98

(I)

GROUND SURFACE

WATER TABLE

LO)

"4ý wU

24

. LE-39

-0

•nLE -51

•nLE -54

nLE -55

*nLE -62

,nLE -53

0 I

2000

- 1000

E z 0

F

._J

- - - - - __ - _1 - -

I I _L

I,

*rr

Ln :3 Z)

ý0 4

2000

1000

z 0

wl -Jl

VATER TABLE

SP

sp

LE-50 sp

Sp - LE-56

nLE-222

nLE-91

nLE-237

II

II II

.17 sp. .21 -SPI .S1 .25 .20 sp .24 I .19

.Sp I..23

.sp LE-37 22 .sp

.sp 22 I .25

., ..L .33 L

kLE-59

S A.LE-57

S-• •EXPLANATION:

-4 4

y,t)

. sp

.> 27

.40

.p

.20

.15

.> 33

.> 20

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING LE-60 - LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, o, [bars]; nLE-70 - NO LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM, c', [bars];

INJECTION TESTS 18 - cr [bars); SP - SINGULAR POINT 0; -- 0;

- CLOSURE PRESSURE; * - OVERPRESSURE.

I I I I 1 0 1 2 3 4

41z

LU Z)

-- 1000

DISTANCE [miles]

In situ stress field. W-E cross-section. Yucca Mountain.

plate 4.2.5.4-99

GROUND SURFACE

0 - *

-1000 -

- LE-39

24

2000

- 1000

E

z 0

..J -Jl

- 0

OPM2

U20416UE2O@ Utg' UEI906

VE2Of* OPMI ammmUýOdSL2CU

Ug'at *4

,.,No

,Oui1aN

PPSPS*Ci IS RIDGE

POO, n*

K25110 CRATE*

UE1700-

C 0 -ILL.S,0

eU125e3

J134"9419'

0 ill

SMULL

#4CV&AO TEST SITE

NFCI

of S*S -

q�.

N

9 'P 0 I S U

it Mm.,,

1P T "I UWAAT12

Location of wells in which temperature measurements were made. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

plate 4.3.2.-l

*

*

e UE190ce.. -

13'. IS

*UE4s

TWE eTWS

1,.

4 4

ua&-O,W0$ '0O_ A" C CcOT E a -. 0,'

0 TWF *Oup.T&,,#S

0 S

-- LOP

Temperature (deg C) 30 50 70 90 i10 130

Composite temperature profile, Pahute Mesa. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

plate 4.3.2.-2

10

U) L

�1) E

�4�)

cv

/

TemperaLure (deg 20 30

C)40

Composite temperature profile for Rainier Mesa and environments. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

1800

400

(I) L ci)

ci) E

-c �4�)

ci)

800

1200

1600

,/ !

ýIt- A ý ') I

(

5 IS

0

200

400

608

800

1000-

TemperaLure (deg C) 25 35

Composite temperature profile for Yucca Flat area. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

plate 4.3.2.-4

45 55

L 'I)

ci) E

(-.

4)

TemperaLure (deg C) is 25 35

0

I d

17c

16d

200

17 17a

L 400 S~16f

E klI 16d

-c -4• 600

17a

800

1000 I

(

4S

Composite plot of temperatures below 100 m, Syncline Ridge area. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

,ý.A I )

J

TemperaLure 40

ill W3

4w8r TW4

I

Composite temperature profile for the southern NTS. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

plate 4.3.2.-6

20 18

3060 I. I

TW5

(deg 5s

C)

20088

70

{/) L 4)

-4J)

4I) E

-c 4) in

6088-

8100-

10808

TWF

1200

60

J '

!

&

emperc 35

,ire (deg 45

VH- I

5001r

UE 25o3

Ký% USW GI

USW HI

Temperatures in wells deeper than 600 m, Yucca Mountain. From Sass and Lachenbruch, 1982.

plate 4.3.2.-7

I25

C)55 65

(I) L

El

�4�)

0

B0ef-

J-13

15001-

aL1 AI4

S15 8

I I I

a | I

Temp. OC Average Approximate Value of General Location Well No. at depth Yearly Geothermal Grad.

of 500m Temp. °C 0 C/km

PM-1 28 =r 15 26

PM-2 51 = 15 72

UE-20f 24 = 15 18

Pahute Mesa. UE-20j 35 z 15 40

U-209 33 = 15 36

UE-19gs 31 = 15 32

U20-el 32 = 15 34

TWE 42 = 16 52

UE-18t 40 = 16 48

HAGE 22 = 16 12

U12s 22 = 16 12

Rainier Mesa- TW-7 22 = 16 12

Yucca Flat- UE-4a 26 = 16 20 Syncline Ridge. -TWB 25 = 16 18

U3cn4 29 = 16 26

UE-179 30 = 16 28

UE-16b 27 = 16 22

TWI 22 = 16 12

TWF 47 = 20 54

TW3 35 =20 30

Southern NTS Jll 35 = 20 30

TW4 25 = 20 10

1W10 26 = 20 12

UE-25a3 37 17 40

VH-1 37 z17 40

Yucca Mountain. J-13 31 17 28

UE-25al 33 17 32

USW G-1 29 17 24

Downhole in situ temperatures at a depth of 500 m, Nevada Test Site.

Plate 4.3.2.-8

wl

PM2(s5)°°Z U20el (32)

* U20q (33 )

* UE20J(35) .Jo UE19qs(31) "1

'\U E20f (24)pM 1(28)

RTZ BLACK MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN ' PAHUTE MESA

UE186 (40) 0

TIMBER MOUNTAIN

U12s (22) OAK SPRING

I . 0 BUTTE

HA-9 F2 2-Jl j .DQL

U E16b (27)

U3Cn4(29) MINE 0

PINNACLES RIOGE1

PROW PASS ;

LjWC31(29) 3E25a3(37) SUE25alI *••

CRATER I g(33 )K WAI4MG •.,TE• •, JI3(31) • wts ~

VHI (37) Y! @ VOLCANIC • JACKASS

FLAT FLATS

J11(35)

SKULL

.• NEVAA TEST SECTER

LATNAOPWELL RANGE

CP HILLS

6

NwE

CENTER

rWF (47) 0

, IS 2,0 =,5 30 MILES

SI' 0 15 2,0 25 30 KLOMETERS

Distribution of in situ temperature at the Nevada Test Site at a depth of 500 m.

plate 4.3.2.-9

HELEN

Z

0 nI-

-qi I ii II I ii II I ii 'I I

37*

30

fl[

Documents

· 2012. 11. 17. · 1160 30' r Quaternary allu Tertiary volcani Mesozoic grani Paleozoic sedim 0 10 km N Geologic 1981. 1160 15' 17 1160 001 17 •.'-!.':; ":'.; :Pahute Mesa -