Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
���
�������� � ����
����� �� �� �� ��� Short Communications
��� �� ���� ���� �����Campanula ����� ���� . ����� !" ��#�$ . �������� �������� � ���� �!"�#�� $ ��%& ������ �!��' "�!
(� ��)*�+ �,Campanula �-�#- ". /& ���0�1 �2��3 4�!��1 ��56 �� 7. �: �*�� ��9 �!��' . 4�-$ ;�� 4��!��' �<�� =�, �� �>? @ ��-��� $ A�� ;��� B ���C? � D�'
��E�% .B FA� 7. 4��3�G 4�6�< B �<�, "�! H2.A� ". FA� �� ;�� B $ ���E�% "��! I+�� .B /& 4�J $ KA2 /$�� .FA� �<�, "�! L.$ ". H�� �JA ? 4M�- ". =��, ��� >N? �N ���� A�� $
OA6 ����? � ��� A� BFA� K�- 4�-�3 PQ�� 4�6�< ��-.�-B ��� ���3�R $ ���2 ��! "��! /& FA5 B �*S! =�, �� $ T�E �!@N ��� A� .FA� H2 �<�� U�$ "�! ���+�� DV�3$
=�, ����? � ��� A� /& ��3�R �-.�-B �2�-. �� T�E �! FA5 B �<�% $ .B .D' D�W B ��� �!���� ��3.A%. $ . L.$ /.�#�� =�, �� �,$A� ���� /& I+� $ A� 4X� ��� T�E 4X� $ .B ��!
F "$ �!. FA5��2 �5* �� �! Y��' �� "�! ? 4M��- ". =��, ��� �@? Z ���� A�� ���3.A%. /& I+� $ 4BA��' 4�� ��RA B 4X �� T�E �! .B ..7QFA5��2 4� 4M�- �! K��- $ ��1%B ".
$ M�� /& 47.�-.PQ ��� $B /.��#�� A��.A� . �-.����. D�' [�� ".? �-�V���. =��, ��� @N? \N ��� $ A� �5QA�� OA6 ��\N ��� �5* A� KA2 �� /& "�! ����� "��! . [�� D�].B B �� �]
�� �*S2 �Q�� . �� �Q�%�V3 ��RA B $ ��3.A%. �5QA�� =��^2�� �� 7��� 4�6�< B 4A_R B��3 .�-.B �� �!�` ? ���+�� =�, �� �/� ��� $ A� OA6 ��PQ��� $ b�G A� 4��< c- �� ".
c-A#2 ��3�R �� d.A�. bQ.�-�' �� PQBM- Campanula karakuschensis Grossh.� $ �3���* B /& �$��_�
���� ��% $ 4��!��' �<�� /B�� A�VQ�� FA5�' 47.�-. /B�� A�/. KA2 BFA� ��! TA�, $B B �-.�-B /B�� A�V9�2 "�! FA� ��3�R H� $ �! 4M��- $ A������ �#! 7. A� 7 /B��� DV�3 ". �Q. 4�
FA5����2��� ���3�� ����- ��2���% b��Q. ���2 (��� �����2 B ���#� Campanula B.B .
��C
DV3�? Campanula hakkiarica.
Fig. 1. Campanula hakkiarica.
��'XQ$ �� �-�#- bQ. ��3 A�2e "��! 4B�_���. ��� 4 ���2A� ���% 7. Davis P.H. 1978. Flora of)
Turkey, Vol. 6 ("����. �_+��0 A���2B ����Q�� $' ���-� Campanula hakkiarica Davis �� ��Q� /.A�Q. ��% ".A� �2 �3 4B.B g��1� ��3��) DV�3�.( ��-�' i��� Campanula
hakkiarica Davis�-�#- j��. A� B ��2A� dA3 k�� 7. ". [��- ��� ���" "��V! " D�].B4A�E T�V3 c�� "�! �^����� �V!& "�!)Cilo Tepe ( m��_�. B�nnn o�# "A�� "$&
�-�' /.��6 �� /��2 �� $ 4�3 p�. 4�3 ��]��3 ��2A� "�0�-. ". .�-�#- /.A�Q. �� q�)� "�!
��Z
� i�� 4�W1Q$ �VQBM- �� r��A �-�' YA��' /.AQ. B /& B� $ $ �3�� . ���Q�� ��12 B� �Q�#- .
�-�#- 7. ����56 4�3 ��A� "�!: ��AJ /�sQ��e& :< 4�2 �2� �� t.B \\�N?\�NN A� �u/�/�@�N� A� ) 3557 IRAN.( ��AJ /�sQ��e& :Y.B �2� D1�% \NNN?�u@N A� �Z/�/�@v>��� . B.)IRAN 39889(.
���� � Wojnowicia graminis � %�� �&� �' (� ��)�� $ ��* +� .,�-�.�� /
����0�1$. j�% "7$�12 ������� M2A /�<7
�-�#- 7. $ �1Q "�! FA� ���Q�G TSJ 4�]�G "�#�� �� 4B�*& [��' "�! @C .� ��Q 7. $ p�3B$A B���& �B�)�� 7.A��3 �� �R q,��� 7. w�< �-�' PQ ��QBA' .�� /��Q.B ��x
$�'XQ �Q�!7 yA3 �� AQ.B -�: Q���V�G� � [� 4��< �� DQ�#� 4A �-7$ "..B ".(ostiole) $ "M�2A M�2A 7. z��] ��Q
(eccentric)� /& T.A,. �2 � $ 4��< "�!� ���� DQ� ". �� �4A� (setae) 4��3 4���3�G p��. . Q���V�G 4.�QB T.A,. �!� � � 4�!�1 M�- [ B�3)DV3 { .( Q���V�G �Q�G� H�� �� BA' [ ��JA
B���)�. ���� DV��3@@>?\@� × ZZ�?��> V�A��� $A }��5���- /BA��' ����9 ���Q P��Q "..B ���2
D~3 {? G��V���Qw�< [Wojnowicia graminis ) �nn × (�G TSJ �$��Q[��' FA� �.
Fig. 2. Wojnowicia graminis pycnidium on lower leaf sheath of wheat (100 ×).
��v
D~3�?�x ��" "�!w�< Wojnowicia graminis ) �nn ×(. Fig. 3. Wojnowicia graminis conidia (400 ×).
���� (beak) B�)�. �� >C\?\@� V�A� $A � ��3�� . Q����2�[ ��!) D~�3� ( 4���< c�- ��� "."..B Z?@ ���) ��J. Z ��� ( B�)�. ��>?�/@ × �/@Z?\� V� A�� $A) ��-�� �/@\?@N ( b���)��QBA' .���2�Q[ �! B�)�. �� 4���2 "�!��*��% "$ �/� $AV� A� Q����V�G 4.�QB T.A,. B � �� [�
� B� $ �Q& . ���2 �!�'Q[� � �!� 4B�� ��EF�! Q����V�G 4.��QB /�3 4�G 7. (G � /& 7. [� z�] B�3 .
�� �� �Q� 7. (G ��_! ��9 [��' ��!��' �-7 . ��Qb w�< V*� c�- ��� ��+�� "�! 4��< "�!.�- $ 4��� �� 4A�� ".��< $ A!�� [��' ��!��' FA� ���Q�G TSJ "$ c- ". (^�
FA� bQ. $ B7 �! �QBA' P1]. ��Q �� w�< "�! � ��1Q "$ ��+�� ���E P�QBM- "��! $ 4�!�1 �<�, �� �1Q c- p-�_6 A�. B 4��< �! Q���V�G "B�Q7 B.�)�$ �QBA' ".� �< [B w�
�QBA' D�V1� D� bQ. . �3 "$ � B A�. b��)� p� �Q.� 4��Q�#- 7. 7.A��3 p3B$A "�!$ �QBA' 4B�_��. /�Q.B . �Q.� [�#� �! � B B � "�! � 1- ���1 ��2.$ ��% �2� �-B.B / . � B
PQBM- ����� �.AR\� ���#2 � $ �� �3�� @N ��-�� � B �QBA' b��)� B.A' .� bQ.�Q. ��!B @� ��-�� � B �-B�� �3 �<�% B.A' . �Q.� [�#� B �! .$.Q U��� "$ DPDA ��3 ���2
$ 4B���#- 7. (��G����G ���-B.B /���1- B���] 7. . ���3 A�2.���R 7$ . ���3 /.M��� B TS���].
��u
�.A���R B "����!\N ��$ � ���� B ��-����� ����Q.� ����`)� 4�����Q�#- b����� B.A���' ����! �����) B����5- .B. $ j�����. A��������'XQ "����!$ 4����3 A���xe �q����5+B���� � o������ �����
. b��Q w���<Wojnowicia graminis Mc Alp Sacc. & D. Sacc ������3QBA' ���Q� .(Saccardo, P.A. 1892. Sylloge Fungurum. Vol. 10 and Sutton, B.C. 1973. Ceska. Mycol. 29)
���� �� ���� �����Fimbristylis dichotoma �� �� $ ���� ��� . '�� � ��2� � �02 . ���� ������� ��� "�#�� $ ��%& ������� ���� �! �!��' "�!
�-�#- ��A� B � �Q��A! "�!) [�Q��A!"IRAN" ( (�� ��� q��)� Fimbristylis
o# �-�#- PQ U��� 4�3 "$&�*� �'�� (Bogomolov) =��� B���� "BS�� /����. 7./.�-7� (IRAN-17224) � AQ7 ��0�1 "..B �2 �QBA' 4�!�1 �3��:
"A��2�] M5� �*����9 �!��' . �� q�#6 "�!��3 "..B �Q.�! �<�� �5QA�� A+<PQ ��� A� .FA� �� �0- �5QA�� �!@/\ ��.A3 P-��7 ��<�� =�, H2.A� ". .D' =�, �� bQe&�/Z $
OA6\ �� C ��-�� ��5�� ��J. �A� DW B $ BA_� �! �� .B �� =�,�� ��� b�Q��G �A�� bQA���'A� �! DQ�, D' 7. A� �� bQe& �� =�,�\ ��-�� A� .��5�� =�, �� �!C �� �/C ��5QA�� OA6 $
@ ��� H�� A� �JA .Y�^�' H�� � A9 �! �JA . =��, �� � �] �B�6 PQ H9AG�/� ��� \ $ OA6\/N ��� �*S2 �/.MQ A� � �Q��$B �!� =�,�/N��� A� . �-���BA- DV3 ���6 �<��%
$ c- ��_� ) DV3�.( �� �) .A ��Flora Iranica (Kukkonen 1998) 4�#�3 �Z@ [��- p��� �2�� 4���'
Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) Vahl ���QBA' [���- b����)� . [���- 7. 4�5���3. ���� ����3�' B F. bisumbellata� 4B�_��. �-�' bQ. ".A� 3 p�. 4�) B ��-�' $B b�Q. 4����2 MQ�#� ��_E
=$� �p�. 4�3 4B$& (. 4�� $ �!��' /� 7 /������ �!B . � $ "M] ��+� �� q�)� 4��' � B 7A! ��6 ��E
� p%�Q �-A� m.M B�3. �Q��%.A� �'��2.AG : /.AQ. $ ��! /���-��%.)� � ��#�- $ "A�� A' q,�� B 7A! ��6 ��E
"A�� A'(
�CN
DV3�? Fimbristylis dichotoma : D �2 4��')A( ��5�� )B( Y�^�' )C( �<��% )D.(
Fig. 4. Fimbristylis dichotoma: A. Habit, B. Spike, C. Glume, D. Nut.
�C�
=$� �? �-�' $B 4���2MQ�#� ��_E Fimbristylis dichotoma $ F. bisumbellata
F. bisumbellata F. dichotoma 3�45
� �� \��� A� @ �� �/@��� A� ��5�� OA6 �Q�1J � A9 Y�^�'
@/� �� \��� A� �/@��� A� Y�^�' =�, ������ A� \��� A� � �] =�, C/N �� v/N��� A� � �� \/���� A� �<��% =�, �/N �� Z/N��� A� v/N��� A� �<��% OA6
����� ��6 �2&��2&�� Bryum caespiticium����� �� . & ���'����7 ��8+
�'��� ����� ���+.���� ������� ��� "�#�� $ ��%& ������� ���� �! �!��' "�!
4� B.BA] B�����-�#- /.A�� /���. B o<.$ bQMQB P1#3 ��+� 7. 4M] 7. ".o# �QBA' "$& ./.�'�! Y�GB "..B "�!4��< S� c- ". p5�- �� ���G =��� B ��E�%�:{:�) �{n�� P����. DV*. �� +�n�� P�-��G$AG ���. �� +�n�� [A%$A�2 ��(
�� ��{� =�-��. B (^� $ �3 4B.B .A< p6�� �n %�QBA' ".��W- .[$7� $A2 "7�� "�!�* Y$ �� b� �2���. B /.�'�! D].B p%�� /BA2{ %B� ���%A' .A< �)*�+ .�!�QS�.
A� ��9 ����$ �� �-�QBA' �#Q.B "M�-$ b��-�GWilson, G.B. 1945. The Venetian)
.(turpentine mounting medium. Stain Technol. 20: 133-135 �'XQ$ j��. A� p�Q "�! [�- p�� ��M �-�' ����3Bryum caespiticium Hedw.
�QBA' �Q����3Crum, H.A. & Anderson, L.E. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North]
[America (2 vols). Columbia Univ. Press. N.Y. . �� 4BA��' ��5�- ��2.AG �� �-�' bQ. ���� �VQL�*���� [A% ��9 �� /��2
��E ���n$ {n �� �nn=B.B B� $ RAMSAY, H.P. 1969. Cytological studies on]
some mosses from the British Isles. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 85-121; FRITSCH, R.
1991. Index to Bryophyte Chromosome Counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca, 40.
Stuttgart, and ARORA, M. & KUMAR, S.S. 1992. Cytological observation in some
[west Himalayan acrocarpous mosses. Crypt., Bryol. Lichénol. 13 (4): 319-326 .
�C\
DV3�? Bryum caespiticium) �nn= :(A . �� =$. 7�%�� �n /;.��� ) ��� [$7� $A2 /�V�G� /�1- . �!B( B . DV3 7. H��A�A.
Fig. 5. Bryum caespiticium (n=10): A. Showing 10 bivalents at metaphase-I
(arrow shows the sex-chromosome), B. Hand-sketched of the figure A.
� $7� $A2 �Q�G B�6 $B �2� �-�' B �2 B.B /�1- ��A� bQ. 7. DE�R �Q��- )��$ �nx= (B.B B� $ . A��R � $7� $A2 Y.M')�nn= ( ��E �� =$. 7�%�� B �2�n
� /.AQ. 7. �-�' bQ. ".A� � $7� $A2 Y.M' b�*$. �QBA' 4�!�1 /;.��� �3��) DV3� .(/;.��� dA_� �!� /�1- . [�W�!B$7 /& 7. �VQ �2 �-B.B dA_� �� P�%� $A�! ��E �� �!
c- $ [�W�!B$7 4�QBA' H���� ���1 A�J �#�- $B �� A�#2 �W�%A') /�1- /�V�G �� DV3 B4�3 4B.B(� /& /.�� p%A' A�-B ��� [$7� $A2 . .B�� "B�6 "7�� H���� Y$ .
��% U��� �2� �-�#- �Q�#�'M� �� j�^#*. ��V�$AV�X��n �QBA' ".BA5�V6 . [�Q��A! B 4�3 ��A� �-�#-“IRAN”���� ������� ��� $ ��%& ������� ���� �!
"�#�� � ".��W- /.AQ. /.A�� �!��' "�! BBA')IRAN 0210 B .(
".MW��^� : [AG A�2B "�<& 7. =��-$. =;) ��!B 4�W1-.B? ���$��! / ( �Q��#�!. A,��] �� "��!4�-7. � �-.B�< $ AV1� BBA'.
� ��� �'�� 9'��*2Isatis stenocarpa � � I. lusitanica. :4; 12 & <��� + ���= +
�+�< . ���#�� $ ��%& ������� ��� $ �!��' ��!�DW� ������� ��� o�.A $ �!
�!)Hedge 1968, In: Rechinger. Flora Iranica, No. 57 (�-�' yA3 B (�� ��!Isatis�-�' I. stenocarpa Stapf �A�0�� yA�3 $ ���%A' A�- B /.AQ. �� �-. /.��6 �� .
10 µm A B
�C@
DV3�? .Isatis lusitanica (= I. stenocarpa)bQ$ 4�W1-.B [�Q��A! B i�� �-�#- (“WU”) . Fig. 6. Isatis lusitanica (= I. stenocarpa). The Type specimen located in Wien Univ.
Herbarium (“WU”).
�C>
�.A��� /& p���. ����3�- /& �Q������3 B /�����#,. [���6 D���*B ���� ��� . ���� 4.A��#! . I. biscutellifolia Boiss. & Buhse ��-�' ���� B g<��- ���!)Species imperfecte notae (
� B [���. o% $ p�. 4B.B .A< . �-�' bQ. B r�� p��. 4BA�x i�� �-�#- 4�!�1 �� . D�� o# o# bQ$M< ��9�G ��+� i�� �-�#- �$& �;�G 4���x �$&)Polak ( �.���W- D� $ /& [�Q��A! bQ$ 4�W1-.B (“WU”) p�. 4�3 Axe . ��A� B � . A�]. ��! 7. i�� �-�#- AQ�0�
��M 4�W1-.B [�Q��A! �].) DV3�( �-�' ��E. yA3 �� $�2� ��3 4B.B q��5+� . ��s��- B 4�� �x �QBA' g�1 I. stenocarpa4�' i�� �-�#- ��E. yA3 q5, ".? p��. PQ�� �+] H��L.$ p�E�0] Axe $ �JA "���G ��� ��� A� p�B�- /& �.A� �� �*��RB ��3�� B ��2
�� i�� �-�#-�?� ��� � A� �� .b���#! ���� o�# ���+� �� �A% $ i��� ��-�#- �$& o# �-�#- "$& $ 47�� "�! ��0�1 q�5+� /& �! �� �-�' "�! Isatis/.AQ. B B� � g��1
�x �3�'XQ$ "�!I. stenocarpa D~�3 FA� D~3 4��' m�_�. /B�� �*��~Q b�%A' A�-B �� �� /& 4�� D~3 $ FA� ��3�R��0�1 I. lusitanica L. �VQ A��#Q�< �2 /& �� �Q�� $ 4B�� /�
p�. TB.A� �3��.�-�#- B 4�� j�- "�!I. lusitanica�+] ?4�' /���� ��� ��2 p�. ". ���+�� ��E �� D �2? � B �+] �Q&. �-�' A�]. A2�*. ��#- /.A�Q. �0�-. ��� .B $ ��3��
�Q�� ��QA%& =�#3 /�-�Q D �3 /.AQ. A� 4$S6 /& ��x.AG =�#�3 $ ���xA� k��� b�+��%� M�- d.A6 BBA'.
".MW���^� : ���-�' �*����sQB AQ��0� =���. $ ����� D��*B ��� /��'A� zA�Q. A��2B "��<& 7. I. stenocarpa� �-.B�< $ AV1� B�3.
�2���>�� ?��4+ @2� ��'�A � �' �*>A ����. �����A ��B2 C��+ & D+�A��6 �/��
:+�/ '�'�B2. ��' 4$A' �V3M^! �V�1-.B 4 "7$��12 $ /S��' 4�W�1-.B �������� �������� �! ���� ����� $ ��%& ������# ' ��!��!�
� B�� K��_� �#�6 o��"B�G[�- �� ���G "��!Phyllactinia suffulta f. pistaciae
Jacz. P. guttata (Wallr.: Fr.) Lev. $ P. imperialis Miyabe p���. 4���3 ���%A) . �����/$.A )����( �����1�-. 7. (����G� K��_����� T.A'�����- "�����!"B�����G ������-B
(Braun 1987. A monograph of powdery mildews)[�- P. guttata . K��_�� ".A� "��!"B�G ����G ���# 7. /���]B 7. "����� ��-�' $ p�%A' A��- BP. suffulta f. pistaciae
B.B .A< /& TB.A� .. �_�� D �6 /.AQ. B � ���. p��� ����G K�: P. suffulta P. guttata P. corylea $ P. imperialis p�. 4�3 �%A) )B�3. ����.w�< /.AQ. "�!(. ���9 A! B��3.
�C�
. ����G K��_�� ".A�� �Q. [�- A�]. o5� BP. imperialis ���%A' A��- B ��*$ /$.A�� B T.A'�-� �2� P. imperialis TB.A� . P. salmonii B.B .A< p��. 4 . p��. ����_' �-�'�
P. imperialis �-�#- q5, A� }����. 4��' "$ 7. ".Paulownia ��QBA' Y.M' bG.L 7. p��. 4 . �-�' bQ. w�< 7. �]A� U��� /����3 $ p!�5�3 D��*B �� P�QL�*�%A "��! D� �6 /.���6 ���
K��_����"B����G B M����- ������G p����. 4����3 �����%A' A����-. }.A����].b����3 $ "����9 (Shin & Choi 2003. Mycotaxon 87, p. 219)�-�#- ��A� �� K��_� 7. �Q�!"B�G ����G
b��� B D<.��R ��Q BA�% ��� A�0�� ��2 p�. ����E�0] "..B �-�' bQ. �2 �-B�#- 4�!�1 �-�' "�!Phyllactinia ����! k��#2 . ��� bQ. �.�!�1 j��. A��/ �2 p�. 4�QBA' p���
��]�Q2 �Q�G K��_� D �6 B �%�Q���"B�G .� � �Q ���G� ���G B ��2 ��_�E p��.���-�' (��� "���!Pleochaeta ���-�' $ Phyllactinia dalbergiae M���-p���. 4���3 4���QB. 4$S6 A� bQ. �Q�G ��]�Q ��9 �� PQ M�- ��2�V�& "$ � ������G "�! ���]�Q . ��2 �����! "
�-�' ��! B /��2�� (� 7. ".Phyllactinia p�. 4�1- 4�!�1 .p� S�% "��! ���]�Q "��! � ������G ���G K��_� B ��-�' 7. MQ�#� M�- (�� A�WQB "��!Phyllactinia �� ���3��.
bQ. 7. $ ����G K��_� D �6 [��- ��� P. pistaciae H.D. Shin & Y.J. Choi 4��QBA' ��%A) p�.. ��9 B k�9 )*�+ � �-�' "�!Phyllactinia ��2 /.AQ. B � �-�#- K��_�� "��! "B��G
B B� � ���G w�< �6�#s "7$�12 B�� �.7$ "�!("IRAN")B o<.$ � ������� ��� "�#�� $ ��%& �-��3 B��s ���A� �!��' "�!. ���A� b�Q. j���. A�� ��2 ��3 g��1
�-�#- /B�� ���G� A��- ����E�0] M�- �-.AQ. "�! ���]�Q �%�Q����2 ��Q�G ���9 $ ���]�Q . " �Q�G /B����]�Q � /�1- ���] �� . � ������G "�! ��!B . �!.��3 b�Q. ��� � �� �� K��_��
"B�G-�' M�- /.AQ. B ���G � P. pistaciae �3 4B.B g��1� . �-�' bQ. ���E�0] AQ�� ��-�#- ��)*�+ j���. A� ��-.AQ. "��! p��. A�Q7 yA�3 ���:
}�����#6 p���. �!�%�Q�����2���� ����]�Q .$ " B���)�. ���� Z?�)?> ( ×)\�N?(\NN?��N)?�NN ( A� $AV� ��]�Q$ .� � �Q ���G� �Q�G B�)�. �� Z?�)?> ( ×)�NN?(uZ?Z\)?CN (� ��3�� .
[�Q���2 BA_� �! "7A�' M �'�� &A� "..B ��Q BA�' }��5��- K��- B DV�3 �Q B��)�. ��� $ � )\Z?(\�?�Z)?�� ( ×)Z�?(Z\?CN)?�� ( �� $A~ ����! A . ��2�V��& ��!(chasmothecia)
"$A2 �5QA�� �2 �Q 4��2.AG ��E �� $ B�Q7 B.�)� �� �!$A' �5QA�� FA�� �-���� I+� B $ ��! FA� �Q;�� I+� B ��- �� �� 4��QB ��! �-��3 A�+< [.��-. b�Q. ) @uN?(@�N?\�N)?\\� (
� A� $AV� ��3�� . ��� ��2�V��& �Q.����. ��� B �1%B �Q.$7 B.��)� )\>?(\�?��)?u ( /& =��, $ 4B�� B�6 ��!\/� ? v/N �� ��2�V��& A�+< A��.A� ��3�� . "$��R ��2�V��& A�!
)��?(>Z?@@)?\v (B����)�. ����� P����& B����6 )>�?(>N?@�)?@N ( ×)��N?(�NN?vN)?C@ ( "$�R P�&A! $ 4B�� A� $AV� $B H��� �^���V�& B��6 B��)�. ��� "��`�� ��� DV�3 ��JA
�CC
)\>?(\\?�v × )>�?(>N?@�)?@N ( � p���. A�� $A~ . ��Q�G����]�Q ���� P��Q � �������G "���!��9 ��]�Q . $ " ���]�Q B��)�. ��� �Q����-. )>�?(@�?��×)CN?(��–\� �� A�� $A�V� ��3�� .
p��� S�% =���, ���� ���! )CN?(>�?\�)?\N ( OA��6 $ A��� $AV� Z?@ ������! A��� $AV� )DV3 "�!� $ �.(
DV3�? Phyllactinia pistaciae) :A (��]�Q � ������G "�! )B (�%�Q���2 )C([�Q���2 �!.
Fig. 7. Phyllactinia pistaciae: A. Penicillate cells, B. Conidiophores, C. Conidia.
DV3 �? Phyllactinia pistaciae :�^��V�& $ P�& �Q.$7 ��2�V�& ) i�9( �!�%�Q����2 [�Q���2 $ �!).p�.(
Fig. 8. Phyllactinia pistaciae: Chasmathecium, appendages, asci with ascospores
(left), Conidiophores and conidia (right).
�CZ
4�3 ��A� "�! �-�#-: "$Pistacia vera L. bQ$M��< ��/�/��{������ 4B.7(IRAN 3372 F) ���-7 /��� A2 �
�/����o��# ��1 �- 4�����2 "$& g�(IRAN 3374 F) �QA��E�- /�s����% /��� A2 �{�/�/���n .B�]A� (IRAN 3375 F) 7�� =�5 p%A� /� A2 ���/�/���� B�3. A_)
(IRAN 3376 F) .��6 BMQ kAJ =�#3 BMQ �/����D�)#�. 4B.7 .(IRAN 1947 F)
"$Pistacia mutica Fisch. & Mey. ���� =���5 p��%A� /��� A2 7��/�/���� $ ��/�/���� B�3. A_) (IRAN 3377 F & 3378 F).
"$Pistacia khinjuk StocksD2 r�� (5, /��.A] BA ���n A� {{/�/���� ���Q (IRAN 2033 F)� A����s-. 4B M���Q$. /�s�����% /���� A2 {/�/���{/�V���3. ����#�
)IRAN 2123 F.(
Puccinia holboelli �� ����� E �� �� $ ���� ��� ��� �� �� � . � +�/ '�'� B2C
���� ������� ��� "�#�� $ ��%& ������� ���� �! /.A�� �!��' "�!
7. ��� b�� B\@N 3 Y.M' �-�' � (�� 7. 4Puccinia /.A�Q. B "$ ��-�' ���G 4A�� /�!��'Brassicaceae 4�QBA' Y.M' p�. . "A�WQB ��-�' IQA�1� ��� A���R Y.M�' 7.
(���� Puccinia [����- p����� Puccinia holboelli (Hornem.) Rostr./�����M� "$ Erysimum caespitosum DC. ���% ".A�� "��Q� Y.M�' /.���6 ��� d��% �!���' 4A�� 7.
c-7 /.AQ. "�! � B7.BAG . B�� 4B�*& � ���� ��RA �� ���� 4�3 ��A� �-�#- .[���� DV�3 ��� �! P9�2 BA' "�!��)>/N?@/N ��� A� ( B ���- ��� $ FA�� bQAQ7 I+� [�#� B 4BA1% $
�-�QBA' 4�!�1 FA� �-�<�% I+� . 4���< c�- ��� $ ���3.B P�#����� p*�R �!�� bQ. ". �-B�� �,��� . "7A' �Q "7A' �!�^�����? /& B��)�. $ 4B��� 4��12 4��3 ���A� ��-�#- B ��!
\@?�C * �\?@\ 47.�-. A� $AV� �3 "A�' . F�! bQ. ���- ��� ��Q BA�' �-��<�% p#�< B �! �-B�� 4�3 PQ�� j. TA, �� . M �W�%$A% "..B �!�^�����Q 4B�� �-�� 4.�QB ��R�- B �
4�3 PQ�� 4�6�< TA, �� �5*�J $ �-. . F�! bQ. 4.�QB 4��< c- �� $ T�E �! B�� ". . 4.�QB c- 4A�� F�! �-�<�% ��R�- B � ��R�- 7. A� B�� �-��� . b�%A�, B �!�^������ 4.��QB p ����$B
�5*�J j. B B $ A� $AV� v? � 47.�-. A� $AV� �3 "A�' . �� �!�^����� �*�5-B $ ��Q�G c�- �� =�, �� DQ�,vN B�� A� $AV� . P� "�!�^����� �Q �!�^�$M ��]�Q . [���� B " A���R ��!
�-B��) DV3� .(E�0] �� d�% ��0�1 ".A�� 4�3 �Q.. ���P. holboelli q�5+� o���� B B���(Ulyanishchev, V.I. 1978. Classification key of Uredinales of USSR, Vol. 2) .
�Cv
����A� B���#- g���1 �G�V���$AV� "���!P. holboelli���-�' ".leptoformp���. "�, �� [����� B �!�^����� 7. "���� �2 ��-.� ��! ��-B�� 4BA�2 [�Q��Q�Q7�� ���*�� $ 4B7.
bQ. �� �-�' �2 P. holboelli o���� 7. ��]A� B (Hylander et al. 1953. Opera Botanica 1:
76) TB.A� /.��6 �� P. thlaspeos C. Schub.�-�#- ��A� p�. 4�3 ��%A' A�- B 7. �Q��! c-7 �-�' $B�2� o# �-S�% 7. 4�3 "$&(IRAN 4558 F & 4562 F) /& ���Q�� $ ��� ��!
B��#- ��Q�� . d�% �-�' $B �Q.� �-.AQ. �-�#- . ���Q�� b�Q. j���. A�� ��-�' P. thlaspeos b3$ 4.�QB �� "�!�^����� "..B p�. A�#2 OA6 $ A� . 4$S�6 �� ��-�' b�Q. B �!�^������
��J.� �,$A� "���-. "..B $ 4�3 PQ�� j. TA, �� 3���� .P. holboelli�-�' 4����2 ". �]A9(microcyclic)[�� ���* 7. $ 4B�� /& /��M� 4��' /�9 ��]��3E. caespitosum ��5*�J
4�W1Q$ B p�. 4�3 4�QB o_�A $ �-���!�2 "�!$ M $c-7 ���6�_�. "�! (montane rust) � k��� B�3.
DV3�?�$M $ �!�^����� �^Puccinia holboelli "$ Erysimum caespitosum. Fig. 9. Teliospores and mesospore of Puccinia holboelli on Erysimum caespitosum.
�Cu
4�3 ��A� �-�#- : "$Erysimum caespitosum 4��2 ��V�*. "M�2A 7A5*. /.�-7� /���. m�_�. p3$$@\NN A� \@/>/�@�u$�QA% �-.B b#�� $ � A� / 4$XG(IRAN 1355 F) III.
���� &' 9'�� '�B�%�ACampanula savalanica & C. bayerniana . & �����!" ��#�$
��+� �4;12. "�#�� $ ��%& ������� ���� D�W� ������� ���� $ �!��' "�! $ ��!o�.A
���-�'Campanula savalanica Fedor. ���-�#- j����.A� Q���! $ /S5��� 4���2 7. ��-�'Campanula bayerniana Rupr. ��-�#- j���. A�� t���.A< 7. �Q��!)Karabagh ( ��%A) 4�3 $ �-. � �'XQ$ j��. A� p�Q�� ��3�� P�V_� D��< AWQ�VQ 7. AQ7 "�!:
�-�' BC. savalanica 4�' FA� P��G 4�6�< ".)cuneate (.7 /$�� �5QA�� ���2 $ �Q 4����E B p�. �-�' B �2 C. bayernianaFA� P��G 4�6�< "..B ����2 $ BA�' ��� �5�< �!
.7Q p�. 4�Q�BA' ��E�� 4�. /.A�Q. 7. "$��3 ��% $ �V�-.AQ. .��% B �-�' $B A! /S5�� 4��2 4��3 Y.M�' ��-.. Rechinger & Schiman-Czeika 1965. Flora Iranica, Vol. 13 and)
(Fedorov 1957. Flora of the U.S.S.R., Vol. 24. �-�#- [�Q��A! B B� � "�! "�!TARI ,TUH $ IRAN /S5�� 4��2 4�W�1Q$ 7. �2
o# 4�3 "$& ��-�' $B 7. P�Q A�! ���E�� ��� �2 �3 DE�R �s��- bQ. $ �QBA' �)*�+ �-. /& b�� B � . �-.B q��+� �2� �-�#- �! ;$. p��)# P�Q B ���R ��2 ��-.B B�� $ �Q��! "
�'XQ$ /& B �2� "�! ��-�� $ B.�- �W��5#! �! " � �.A���� � p�*�R ��� p�*�R P�Q 7. �Q��4�QB AWQB � B�3 .� �=�� /.��6�-�#- 4�#3 IRAN 50706 FA�� "..B TA�, P�Q 7. "��!
��5�3 DV3 �5�< C. bayerniana p��. A�WQB TA�, 7. $ .7 "..B /& ����2 �Q ��0�1 �- 4�� �3�� �< � . 4�' /& FA� P��G 4�6 ".p�.. B����1�G �2�� �-�' $B TB.A� D�*B b�#! �� � [�- [��- j��. A� $ BBA' �� /�!��' ".�' [�- [��� qR D�*B C. bayerniana =��5< B��
p�.. �-�#- 4�3 ��A� "�! : �2 /�sQ��e&4 �+< /S5� 4��3 [A�W�& TA, �� �� D���\CNN A��
�C/Z/�@v> % ���#,� "B.��� ����A��6 $ �W�����<&)IRAN 50706(4���3 � /S5��� 4���2 D���� \vNN A� @/�/�@�@ "��. $ �J$A% )TARI (13860 /S5� 4�2 �\uCN A�� >/>/�@��
�����J$A%6076) (TARI /S5����� =�#����3 �@vNN?@�NN A����� �u/�/�@CCA�����1-.� 1261) (TARI� /S5� ���+<@CNN?@>NN A� C/>/�@�N � A� 3661) (IRAN.
�ZN
�����Hemitrichia abietina �����>F�2 ���� D>�2 ��������� . �G���02 H5" .
���� ������� ��� �!"�#�� $ ��%& ������� ���� �!�!��' "
w�< P�^2 ��Q p��� ��V� "�! �����R �,��� "��!(true slime molds) "..B � "�!A��� "$ $ 4B�� �-�� YA��'k�9 DW� �2 A��- ��� $ ��!.M�#9 4����G "�!
� �3 �!��' "�Q��� ���2 . o# �, �-�#- "$& �9�< ���� "�! �-�#- ��� 4$A�' bQ. 7. ".T� $MQ I+� B AQ7 ��0�1 w�< "�! Armillaria mellea�QBA' 4�!�1 :
�!X-.�^�. $ "$A2 ���B B �Q "B.A_-. DV3 �� �5*�J $�� "�!B 4����2 �Q�G PQ "$ A��� "$ �#���� $ �Q�G /$�� �Q $ D�V1�� �-�3. 4�3 ��A� �-�#- B $ ��1- 4��QB �Q�G
[�QX-.�^���. ���-B�� 4��5���9 ���3 A����� ���� �-������ ����+� 7. ���!.[�QX-.�^���. 47.���-. ���! �? @/N ��� $ A� � � �s-�- �� d.A� B7 c- �-B�� . � $ 4B�� K7�- [�Q�QAG ��� /& �-��<�% ��
�3S� [�QX-.�^�. D �V�� BBA' �<��� /��s�% P�Q DV�3 ��� [�Q��QAG �-����� ��� � . � �-� .���G�2�[��(capillitium) �V53 7. ���3 7. ". ��! �)�1� "B.�� B $ c�- B7 "
A+< ��C?@ A� $AV� p�. 4�3 D�V1� . ��3 bQ. �! � � ��G "A!�� "..B y��$ 4B�]4B�� $ /& I+�B - 4�!��1 .B�] �Q.$7 �! ��# B��3 . ���G��2� �Q;��� [�V����. 7. ��-�' b�Q. B [�� - .B�]A��# 3��� . ��3 "���-. �! ���G�2 "� �-. 4�Q.7 PQ �� "B.� B �Q T�E [�� �� H��] �Q�
� BBA' . � 4�Q.7 bQ. 4�3 ��A� �-�#- B � �3 4�!�1 y��$ .F�! �!"$A2 ���QM� /$��� �� A+< �� ��+��>?�N 47.�-. A� $AV� �-�3 "A�'. F�! �! 4B�� p*�RB 4�QB B7 c- �� ".
� �-��3) DV�3 �n(. /.���6 p��� ��-�' b�Q. Hemitrichia abietina (Wigand) G. Lister �QBA' �Q����3(Martin, G.W. and Alexopolous, C.J. 1983. The myxomycetes) .
�' bQ. 7. �5*�J �- �!��' "�Q��� $ k�9 "$ 7. ���A� B�� ��-�#- �� . 4��3 Y.M�' T� $MQ I+� �!�-�' " Armillaria mellea o# �3 "$& . �-�'��V� P�Q ��� d�% p��
7. "�< $ HV� =�0�.[�QX-.�^�. �-���� ��+� �� I+�T� $MQA. mellea B��� 4��5�9. �-�' bQ. �Q.��G 7. Y.M' b����- bQ.� /.AQ. B p�� ��V� �3��.
4��3 ���A� �-�#- : =����] ��� H*���. 4B�� /S��' /����.�N/v/�@v\ �<B��E $ ��E& (IRAN 12400 F).
�Z�
**********
DV3 �n? A .[�QX-.�^�. �-�' Hemitrichia abietina B . [�Q��QAG �-���� ������G�2 ����� 7. (G [�QX-.�^�.�[�� �! C $D .���G�2 ��3�[��.
Fig 10. A. Sporangium of Hemitrichia abietina, B. Basal portion of
peridium, C & D. Capillitium
B
D C
5 µm
A
0.5 mm 0.5 mm
5 µm
�Z\
I�G�
AQ7 DV3 $B)DV3 "�!Z $ v (�*�� �� r��A /.���6 p�� ". :" (�� ���A� Isatis
/.AQ. B" - �QA3 �5QA% "� �� 4��^� Y�W �QA�1- b��1�G 4�#�3 B "���. �_+�0 $ ��-
�� C) �( �@v> � p�. 4B��%..
Addendum
The following figures (Figs 7 and 8) of an article entitled: "A study of the
genus Isatis in Iran" authored by S. SAJEDI, F. SHARIFNIA and M. ASSADI
published in the previous issue of Rostaniha [Vol. 6 (1), 2005] were missed out.
�Z@
DV3Z? �3�] M�*�-& ". Isatis$ Pachypterygium �� Y$Ward ) p�� A��1�� �������� �� DV3 (Q�-AQ7v �) .A 3�B.(
Fig. 7. Cluster analysis of Isatis and Pachypterygium using Ward method
(for more information, refer to Fig. 8 legend).
�Z>
REGR factor score 2 for analysis 1
2.52.01.51.0.50.0-.5-1.0-1.5-2.0
RE
GR
fa
cto
r sco
re
1 f
or
an
aly
sis
1
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
sty2sty1num2
num1eleg
arm2arm1
brev2brev1
mul2mul1
cam3cam2cam1
tra3
tra2tra1
tin1
rug3rug2rug1
ra3ra2ra1
pach2pach1
or1
mi3mi2 mi1
lus3lus2lus1
lue3leu2leu1
ko2ko1
gl2
gl1ga3ga2ga1
em3
em2em1
co2co1
stev2stev1
sten2
sten1su2su1ma3
ma2ma1
bes3
bes2 bes1
cap
bu3bu2bu1
DV3v?��� �-�' "��� "�!Isatis $ Pachypterygium �_*� j��. A� "�! .(PCA) Fig. 8. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Isatis and Pachypterygium.
sub= I. cappadocica subsp. subradiata, ma= I. cappadocica subsp. macrocarpa,
sten= I. cappadocica subsp. stenophylla, bes= I. cappadocica subsp. besseri,
cap= I. cappadocica subsp. cappadocica, stev= I. cappadocica subsp. steveniana,
tar= I. trachycarpa, or= I. ornithorhynchus, pach= I. pachycarpa,
ra= I. raphanifolia, rug= I. rugulosa, tin= I. tinctoria, mi= I. minima,
mul= I. multicaule, gl= I. glauca, ko= I. kotschyana, leu= leuconeura,
lus= I. lusitanica, brev= I. brevipes, bu= I. buschiana, cam= I. campylocarpa,
ga= I. gaubae, co= I. cochlearis, em= I. emarginata.
71
Rostaniha, Vol. 6, 2005
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
Campanula hakkiarica, a new record to Iran. F. AGHABEIGI. Dept. of Botany,
Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
In review of the specimens belong to the genus Campanula, a specimen was
seen which had the following morphological characters:
Caespitose saxatile perennial. Flowering stems ascending, 3-14 cm, at base
with densely rosette leaves, in upper part laxly 1-6 flowered, glabrous. Leaves
glabrous on both sides, sometimes ciliate at margin; rosette leaves obovate-
oblanceolate, 10-40 × 5-12 mm, narrowed into petiole to 30 mm, obtuse, acute,
dentate or rarely crenate-dentate; cauline leaves on flowering stems few, oblong,
5-15 mm, ± erect. Ovary obconical, 4 mm, glabrous or ciliate on nerves. Calyx lobes
triangular-lanceolate, 7-13 mm, erect, patent in fruit, glabrous or ciliate; appendages
lanceolate, subulate, acute, 1-2 times of ovary. Corolla cylindrical-campanulate,
20-30 × c. 20 mm, divided to 1/4 into broad ovate-triangular lobes, blue, outside
glabrous, lobes long pilose within. Style included, stigmas 3. Capsule ± erect,
opening by three basal pores. Seeds ellipsoid, 1.0 × 1.5 mm, flattened, brown with
narrow pale margin, shiny.
This specimen resembles C. karakuschensis Grossh. but its stems are slender,
leaves glabrous on both sides, dentation smaller, calyx appendages longer and
lanceolate. The last character is important in Campanula identification key.
This specimen with its above-mentioned characters was identified by using
Flora of Turkey (DAVIS P.H. 1978. Vol. 6) and Dr. M. Assadi’s confirmation as
Campanula hakkiarica Davis (Fig. 1, refer to the Persian text). C. hakkiarica is
introduced from S.E. Turkey in “Hakkari” and is endemic of this country. Iranian
72
specimens are near type’s habitat and its existence in Iran confirms species
distribution. Specimen type is from Turkey: Hakkari, Cilo Tepe, crevices of
limestone rocks, 3000 m.
Azerbayjan: Makou, Kuh-e Ghojedagh, 2100-2250 m, 10.8.1971 (IRAN 3557).
Azerbayjan: Makou, Dashfishel, 1930-2000 m, 4.7.2005 (IRAN 39889).
First report of Wojnowicia graminis from wheat roots in Fars Province (Iran).
A. FASSIHIANI. Fars Agricultural Res. Center, Zarghan, Iran
A fungal species was isolated from lower leaf sheaths and roots of wheat
plants infected with take-all in several locations in Fars Province of Iran. These
regions were: Shiraz area vicinity, Marvdasht, Saadat-abad and Dariun. For
isolation, pieces of stem and root tissues were placed on moist filter papers and
incubated in a naturally lighted germinator at 15+2◦ C. Pycnidia were formed mainly
on lower stem and leaf sheaths, were dark brown, measuring 514-771 × 231-334 µm
with a central or eccentric ostiole and several brown setae surrounding the ostiole or
projecting from the wall of pycnidia (Fig. 2, refer to the Persian text). Pycnidia were
superficial or erumpent, base nearly spherical with one or two long beak, measuring
231-462 µm. The brown conidia were straight or slightly curved with 3-7 transverse
septa (mostly 7-septate are frequent) and measuring 25-37.5 × 3.1-4 µm (Fig. 3,
refer to the Persian text). They were produced from small phialides lining the wall of
the pycnidium. Based on the above-mentioned characteristics, the fungus was
identified as Wojnowicia graminis (Mc Alp) Sacc. & D. Sacc. (SACCARDO, P.A.
1892. Sylloge Fungurum. Vol. 10 and SUTTON, B.C. 1973. Ceska. Mycol. 29). The
fungus was slightly pathogenic on wheat plants. The minimum, maximum and
optimum temperatures for growth were 5, 25 and 30◦ C, respectively. No growth
occurred at 35◦ C .
73
A new record of Fimbristylis dichotoma from Iran. M. AMINI RAD. Dept. of
Botany, Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
In reviewing of herbarium specimens ("IRAN" Herbarium) belonging to
Fimbristylis genus, a specimen (collected by Bogomolov in 1947) from Mazandaran
Province (IRAN-17224) was seen with following characteristics:
Perennial, grayish-green. Stem deeply grooved, about one mm in diameter.
Leaves 1/2 to 2/3 of stem length; ligule dense fringes. Inflorescence 7.5 x 2-6 cm;
mostly spikes solitary and with peduncle to 15 mm; lowest bract longer than
inflorescence, up to 12 cm. Spikes 6-6.5 x 3 mm, ovate. Glumes coriaceous, ovate.
Stamen 1; style 1.5-2 x 0.2 mm, deciduous; stigmas 2, to 0.5 mm. Nut lenticular,
trabeculate and white (Fig. 4, refer to the Persian text).
Based on the above characteristics and referring to Flora Iranica, No. 173
(KUKKONEN 1998), the specimen was identified as Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.)
Vahl. The name F. bisumbellata, is sometimes used for this taxon (the determination
characters between these two species are presented in Table 1).
General distribution: Afghanistan, India and Iran.
Table 1. Morphological characters of Fimbristylis bisumbellata and F. dichotoma
F. bisumbellata F. dichotoma
Characters
1-2 mm 3-3.5 mm Spike width
scarius coriaceous Glume
1.3-2 mm 3.5 mm Glume length
to 1 mm 2 mm Style length
0.6-0.8 mm 1-1.2 mm Nut length
0.5-0.7 mm 0.8 mm Nut width
74
Chromosome count in Bryum caespiticium (Musci) in Iran. S. SHIRZADIAN
and S.B. DJAVADI. Dept. of Botany, Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
A moss sample was collected from Shemshak, Dizin (Tehran Province) in
Jun. 2005. Capsules, in which the annulus had just turned brown, were immediately
fixed in Piennar’s fluid containing ethanol (96%), chloroform and propionic acid,
6:3:2 for 24 hours and stored in 70% ethanol. Meiotic chromosome were studied by
squashing the sporogenous tissue in 2% acetocarmine. The slides were made
permanent by the Venetian turpentine (WILSON, G.B. 1945. The Venetian
turpentine mounting medium. Stain Technol. 20: 133-135).
On the basis of morphological characters, the specimen was identified as
Bryum caespiticium Hedw. [CRUM, H.A. & ANDERSON, L.E. 1981. Mosses of
Eastern North America (2 vols). Columbia Univ. Press. N.Y.].
This nearly cosmopolitan species, is found to exist in four cytological forms
i.e. n=10, 11, 20 and 30 [RAMSAY, H.P. 1969. Cytological studies on some mosses
from the British Isles. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 62: 85-121; FRITSCH, R. 1991. Index to
Bryophyte Chromosome Counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca, 40. Stuttgart, and
ARORA, M. & KUMAR, S.S. 1992. Cytological observation in some west
Himalayan acrocarpous mosses. Crypt., Bryol. Lichénol. 13 (4): 319-326].
The results indicate that, two basic chromosome numbers (x=10 and x=11)
occur in this species. In the present study, however, 10 chromosomes (n=10) are
obtained at the metaphase-I which is the first report for this species from Iran
(Fig. 5, refer to the Persian text). The bivalents show a tendency of precocious
disjunction. One of the bivalents found to be heteromorphic, disjoined precociously
into two lightly stained dissimilar half-bivalents (marked with arrow) which may be
considered to be a sex-chromosome. The course of meiosis was found to be normal.
The photograph was taken by Olympus Photomicroscope at initial
magnification of 340X. The voucher specimen (IRAN 0210 B) is deposited in the
“IRAN” Herbarium, Dept. of Botany, Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran,
Iran.
Acknowledgements: Authors are grateful to Dr. P.L. Uniyal (Delhi Univ., India) for
the expert guidance.
75
Synonymy of Isatis stenocarpa with I. lusitanica. S. SAJEDI and M. ASSADI
Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst. and Forests & Rangelands Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
HEDGE (1968, In: Rechinger. Flora Iranica, No. 57) in the section on Isatis
(Brassicaceae) has included and briefly described, Isatis stenocarpa Stapf as an
endemic species for Iran, but with an uncertainty about the identification. Thus, he
has placed the species under ‘Species imperfecte notae’ implying the need to
examine the type specimen, which is collected by POLAK from Pachenar area of
Qazvin (Iran) and kept in Vienna Univ. Herbarium (“WU”). In a recent study, the
image of the type specimen (Fig. 6, refer to the Persian text) obtained from the
above-mentioned herbarium, was examined and compared with the original
description and Flora Iranica. As a result, it was found that the fruit was 4-5 mm
wide, narrowly cunneate-linear and not 8 mm wide, obovate as described in the
above source. In addition, new collections were made from the site of the type
specimen and were compared with other species of Isatis in Iran. The results
revealed that, the characteristics of I. stenocarpa were identical to those of
I. lusitanica L. in terms of annularity, plant height, leaf shape, leaf margin as well as
fruit shape and dimensions. Therefore, I. stenocarpa must be made a synonym of
I. lusitanica which is older than I. lusitanica. The fruit of I. lusitanica is linear-
cunneate in younger plants, which becomes oblong-linear in mature ones. The latter
species is not endemic to Iran, as it is also spread in Greece, N. Africa, Syria,
Palestine, southern Turkey and northern Iraq.
Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Dr. I. Mehregan, who made a
digital image of I. stenocarpa available.
On the taxonomy of the causal agent of powdery mildew on Pistacia in Iran.
M. PIRNIA, S.A. KHODAPARAST and M. ABBASI. College of Agriculture, Gilan
Univ., Rasht and Dept. of Botany, Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
The powdery mildew fungus on Pistacia spp., has been recorded as
Phyllactinia suffulta f. pistacia Jacz., P. imperialis Miyabe and P. guttata (Wallr.:
Fr.) Lev. BRAUN in his world monograph of powdery mildews (BRAUN 1987.
76
A monograph of the Erysiphales), merged P. suffulta f. pistaciae with P. guttata
and regarded P. imperialis as a taxonomic synonym of P. salmonii Blumer on
Paulownia imperialis Sieb. & Zucc. In Iran, P. suffulta, P. guttata, P. corylea and
P. imperialis have been considered as causal agent of Pistacia powdery mildew in
Iran (ERSHAD 1995. Fungi of Iran). However, ERSHAD (l.c.) considered
P. imperialis as current name for powdery mildew fungus of Pistacia. Recently,
SHIN & CHOI (2003. Mycotaxon 87, p. 219) studied the powdery mildew fungus
on Pistacia and described it as a new species viz. P. pistaciae based on some
morphological characteristics such as morphology of penicillate cells and having
spirally twisted conidiophore foot cell. The latter character of P. pistaciae resembles
those of P. dalbergiae and the species of Pleochaeta. In the framework of
taxonomic study of the genus Phyllactinia in Iran, all specimens belong to
Phyllactinia on Pistacia deposited in "IRAN" herbarium reinvestigated. This study
showed that Iranian specimens well agree with P. pistaciae in having spirally
twisted conidiophores and 1 to multi-celled penicillate cells.
The other characteristics of this species are as follows: Conidiophers erect,
mostly composed of three cells, (100-)110-200(-210)× (4-)5-7 µm, foot-cell spirally
twisted or wavy, (60-)72-97 (-100)× (4-)5-7 µm, coindia formed singly and were
clavate, non-papillate, somewhat pointed or conically rounded at the apex,
(55-)60-72(-75)× (15-)17-25(-27) µm, chasmothecia depressed-globose, numerous,
scattered or subgregarious on the lower leaf surface or rarely on the higher leaf
surface, (225-)250-350(-390) µm in diameter, acicular appendages in the equatorial
zone of chasmothecia, (9-)15-21(-24) in number, 0.8-1.2 times as long as
the ascomatal diameter, asci (28-)33-47(-55) in a chasmothecium, measuring
(63-)80-100(-110)× (30)35-40(-45) µm, 2-spored, ascospores oval to ellipsoid
(30-)35-40(-45)× 18-22(-24) µm (Figs 7 & 8, refer to the Persian text). Feet of
penicillate cells composed of one to several cells, terminal cell measuring
25-55(-60)× 15-35(-45) µm, filaments (20-)25-45(-60) µm long and 3-7 µm wide.
Materials examined:
On Pistacia vera L.
Iran: Ghazvin, 10.11.1950, Taghizadeh (IRAN 3372 F); Kerman, Zarand, 10.1957,
coll. Unknown (IRAN 3374 F); Kerman, Rafsanjan, Naserieh, 16.9.1971,
77
Barkhordar (IRAN 3375 F); Kerman, Jiroft, Jebal-e Barez, 3.10.1974, D. Ershad
(IRAN 3376 F); Yazd, N.W. Yazd, Aghda, 12.2004, Asmailzadeh (IRAN 1947 F).
On Pistacia mutica Fisch. & Mey.
Iran: Kerman, Jiroft, Jebal-e Barez, 3.10.1974 & 5.11.1976, D. Ershad (IRAN 3377
F & 3378 F).
On Pistacia khinjuk Stocks
Iran: Khorassan, Tabass, Robat-e Kalmard, 1370 m, 14.10.1972, M. Riazi
(IRAN 2033 F); Kerman, Rafsanjan, Raviz, Deh-e Anjir, 24.9.1993, M. Ashkan
(IRAN 2123 F).
Puccinia holboelli, a new member for Iranian rust flora. M. ABBASI. Dept. of
Botany, Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
Among more than 230 recorded species of Puccinia in Iran, five species have
been recorded on Brassicaceae family members. In this report, another rust fungus
viz. Puccinia holboelli (Hornem.) Rostr., is newly reported on a member of the
Brassicaceae family (Erysimum caespitosum DC.) from Iran. The fungus formed
systemic hypophylous telia mostly on the whole lower leaf surface. Telia were
round, chestnut brown, compact and 0.3-0.4 mm in diameter. Teliospores were
clavate or clavate-oblong, rounded or somewhat narrowed above, slightly
constricted at septum, attenuated towards the base. Teliospore dimensions ranged
from 32-52 x 16-23 µm. The teliospore wall was smooth, brown above, paler below,
2 µm thick at sides, 5-8 µm at apex. Teliospore pedicels were hyaline, persistent and
long in length (up to 80 µm). Mesospores were present (Fig. 9, refer to the Persian
text). Morphological features of the fungus fit with those described for P. holboelli
(ULYANISHCHEV, V.I. 1978. Classification key of Uredinales of USSR, Vol. 2).
The present rust fungus is microcyclic and leptoform. Several germinated
teliospores were found in telia on studied material. Puccinia holboelli is considered
to be a synonym of P. thlaspeos C. Schub., (HYLANDER et al. 1953. Opera
Botanica 1: 76). However, study of authentic materials of these two species from
Finland (IRAN 4558 F & 4562 F), showed they are different. Puccinia thlaspeos
78
differs from P. holboelli, in having narrower teliospores with paler wall.
Erysimum caespitosum is a high elevation plant, for this reason P. holboelli, is
considered as a montane rust.
Material examined:
On Erysimum caespitosum
Iran: Mazandaran Province, Elika, Central Alburz, Varvasht Mountain, 3200 m,
14.7.1980, F. Termeh & B. Daneshpazhuh (IRAN 1355 F), III.
Synonymy of Campanula savalanica with C. bayerniana. F. AGHABEIGI and
M. ASSADI. Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst. and Forests & Rangelands Res. Inst.
Tehran, Iran
Campanula bayerniana Rupr. and C. savalanica Fedor. have been described
from Karabakh (Caucasus) and Sabalan mountain (N.W. Iran), respectively. They
were originally separated by using the following characters:
In C. savalanica, leaf blade is cuneate at the base and calyx is nearly
unappendaged, whereas in C. bayerniana. leaf blade is cordate to rounded and the
calyx is appendaged. Both species were recorded from Iran, Kuh-e Sabalan
(RECHINGER & SCHIMAN-CZEIKA 1965. Flora Iranica, Vol. 13 and FEDOROV
1957. Flora of the U.S.S.R., Vol. 24).
The materials other than in field, were also studied in IRAN, TARI and TUH
herbaria from Sabalan area, where both species were recorded. The above-
mentioned characters even in a single population were not correlated i.e. specimens
were observed with cuneate leaf blade base and appendaged calyx, and vice versa.
Also the characters continuously varies from one shape to the other (IRAN 50707).
Therefore, it is proposed that, the two species are synonyms. C. bayerniana has the
priority and therefore, is the correct name.
Specimens examined: Azarbaijan: Sabalan mountain, Ghotoursou to Shahbil, hot-
water spring, 2600 m, 7.8.2005, F. Aghabeigi & A. Javadi (IRAN 50706); Shahbil,
Kuh-e Sabalan, 2800 m, 24.7.1974, Foroughi & Assadi (TARI 13860); Kuh-e
Sabalan, 2960 m, 27.7.1972, Foroughi (TARI 6076); N. Sabalan, 3500-3800 m,
79
30.7.1987, Javanshir (TARI 1261); Ghotoursu, Sabalan, 3400-3600 m, 15.7.1971,
Termeh (IRAN 3661).
Hemitrichia abietina, a new myxomycete for Iran. M.R. ASEF. Dept. of Botany,
Plant Pests & Diseases Res. Inst., Tehran, Iran
Myxomycyetes or true slime molds are cosmopolitan group and can be found
in a variety of different habitats including plant debris, dead and decaying woods.
However, the most likely places to find slime molds are moist forests. In the year
2003, isolates were observed on rhizomorphs of Armillaria mellea in Gilan Province
(Iran) and were identified as Hemitrichia abietina (Wigand) G. Lister (MARTIN,
G.W. and ALEXOPOLOUS, C.J. 1983. The myxomycetes).
Sporangia globose to sub globose, 0.3-1 mm in diameter, gregarious, shining
yellow to orange. Peridium thin, basal portion of peridium remaining as a persistent
cup. Capillitium an open network of branched yellow threads 3-6 µm in diameter,
with irregular spirals, without spines. Spores globose, yellow in mass, 10-14 µm in
diameter (Fig. 10).
This species is a new record for Iran.
Material examined on rhizomorphs of Armillaria mellea, Gilan Prov., Asalem to
Khalkhal road, 1.12.2003, Asef & Sadeghi (IRAN 12400 F).
**********
80