Upload
lordniklaus
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 24891
1/33
• Classical epigenetic systems
• Gene silencing
• Viral cross-protection
• Epigenetics in plant development
8/13/2019 24891
2/33
• Transposons - change of phase
• Paramutation in maize
CLASSICAL EPIGENETIC SYSTEMS
8/13/2019 24891
3/33
• Heritable, but reversible
• Epimutants differ in theirdevelopmental expression patterns
• The transition from active to cryptic (and thereverse) takes several plant generations
Changes in Spm activity phase
8/13/2019 24891
4/33
• McClintock: an inactive transposon wakes up when anactive transposon is present, but segregates unchanged
• Fedoroff: an active element can heritably wake up aninactive or a cryptic element
• The transition from active to cryptic (and the reverse)takes several plant generations
Genetic analysis of phase change
8/13/2019 24891
5/33
Paramutation at the R locus in maize
• A directed, heritable change in gene expression
• r-st and r -mb termed PARAMUTAGENIC
• R-r termed PARAMUTABLE
• Altered expression is heritable
• Partial reversion when homozygous
• A paramutable allele can become paramutagenicupon exposure to a paramutagenic allele
Brink, R. A., Styles, E. D. and Axtell, J. D. (1968) Science, 159: 161-170
8/13/2019 24891
6/33
R gene paramutation in maize
Walker, E. L. (1998), Genetics, 148: 1973-1981
8/13/2019 24891
7/33
Structure of a paramutagenic R allele
Kermicle, J. L., Eggleston, W. B. and Alleman, M. (1995), Genetics, 141: 361-372
• The R-st allele contains several highly homologous repeats
• Paramutagenicity is directly proportional to the number of repeats
• Transcription start sites are methylated
8/13/2019 24891
8/33
Structure of the paramutable R-r allele
Walker, E. L. (1998), Genetics, 148: 1973-1981
8/13/2019 24891
9/33
Common themes intransposon inactivation and paramutation
• Sequence duplication is central
• Promoter sequences are methylated
• Genes/TEs transcriptionally silenced
• Silencing is heritable, but reversible
• Both involve transposon sequences
8/13/2019 24891
10/33
Gene silencing (co-suppression) by trangenes
• Transgenes can silence endogenous genes
• More transgenes, more gene silencing
• Inverted repeats are especially effective
• Silenced genes are often methylated
• Silencing can be heritable
• Silenced genes can be “paramutagenic”
Que, Q, Want, H.-Y, and Jorgensen, R.A. (1998). Plant J. 13: 401-9
8/13/2019 24891
11/33
Transcriptional and post-transcription silencing(TGS and PTGS)
• Silencing can be transcriptional, post-transcriptional or both
• TGS is associated with promoter methylation
• PTGS is associated with coding sequence methylation
• Promotor methylation is not required for initiation of silencing
• Methylation is required for the maintenance of silencing
8/13/2019 24891
12/33
Gene silencing and viral resistance
• Viral infection confers immunity to further infection
• Transgenic plants expressing coat protein are resistant
Ratcliff, F., Harrison, B. D. and Baulcombe, D. C. (1997). Science 276: 1558-1560
8/13/2019 24891
13/33
Viral resistance is RNA-mediated
• Transgene-induced resistance resembles PTGS
• Resistance is mediated by RNA
• Virus infection can result in co-suppression
Ratcliff, F., Harrison, B. D. and Baulcombe, D. C. (1997). Science 276: 1558-1560
PVX
W22
PVX. W22
8/13/2019 24891
14/33
Gene silencing: a systemic signal
Voinnet, O., and Baulcombe, D. C. (1997). Nature 389: 553
8/13/2019 24891
15/33
The systemic gene silencing signal is RNA
• Non-overlapping gene fragments cross-silence
• RNA moves between cells in plants
• Plants encode RNA-dependent RNA polymerases
8/13/2019 24891
16/33
TGS and PTGS: is there a relationship?
Wassenegger, M., Heimes, S., Reidel, L., and Sanger, H. L. (1994) Cell 76: 567-76.
P35S PSTVd cDNA pAnos P35S PSTVd cDNA pAnos
Replication competentReplication incompetent
Transcription only
No replication
No methylation
Transcription
Replication
Methylation
8/13/2019 24891
17/33
microRNAs and silencingRNAs in plants
Mallory, A. C., and Vaucheret, H. (2004) Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7:120-125.
8/13/2019 24891
18/33
microRNAs and silencingRNAs in animals
Mallory, A. C., and Vaucheret, H. (2004) Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7:120-125.
8/13/2019 24891
19/33
The Arabidops is hy l1 mutation
wildtype
hyl1
0.6 µM ABANo ABA
8/13/2019 24891
20/33
The hy l1 mutation affects miRNA levels
wt hyl1 hen1-1 1 3
ARF8
SCL6-III
rRNA
MYB33
35S::HYL1
wt hyl1 hen1-1 1 3
35S::HYL1
miR167
miR171
tRNA +5S rRNA
miR159
UBQ1DCL1
wt hyl1 hen1-1 wt hyl1 hen1-1
8/13/2019 24891
21/33
The hyl1 mutation affects mRNA stability
B.
Time (hrs)
% i
n i t i a l v a l u e
10
100
0 4 8 12
MYB33
hyl1
wt
35S::HYL1
50
30
hyl1
wt
35S::HYL1
SCL6-III
0 4 8 12
hyl1
wt
35S::HYL1
0 4 8 12
ANP1
hyl1
wt
35S::HYL1
ARF8
0 4 8 12
8/13/2019 24891
22/33
HYL1 is
innuclearbodies
8/13/2019 24891
23/33
• TnpA and TnpD are required for transposition
• TnpA is also a weak transcription factor
Spm has one gene,but codes for two proteins
Transposition
active Spm
TnpA
promoter
TnpD
TnpDmRNA
TnpAmRNA
TnpD
8/13/2019 24891
24/33
• Promoter methylated, element inactive
• Methylation of GC-rich sequence confers heritability
• Reversed by Spm -encoded TnpA
Changes in Spm activity phase
Methylated site Unmethylated site
cryptic Spm active Spm TnpA
promoter
GC-rich sequence
8/13/2019 24891
25/33
• TnpA is a weak transcription factor
• TnpA binds unmethylated and hemimethylated DNA
• TnpA promotes active demethylation
Molecular mechanism of Spm activation
Methyl group promoter
replication
TnpA
TnpA TnpA
8/13/2019 24891
26/33
Transposon silencing: the chromatin connection
transposition
silencing
mRNA
siRNAs?
siRNAsDNA methylasehistone deacetylasechromatin remodeling proteins
8/13/2019 24891
27/33
The story of papayaringspot virus
http://www.apsnet.org/education
/feature/papaya/Top.htm
8/13/2019 24891
28/33
QuickTime™ a nd a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Papaya ringspot virus
http://www apsnet org/education/feature/papaya/Top htm
8/13/2019 24891
29/33
http://www.apsnet.org/education/feature/papaya/Top.htm
1940s: PRS virus discovered in Hawaii
1950s: Oahu’s papaya industry wiped out
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
1960s: Papaya industry moves to Puna district
Papaya ringspot virus
8/13/2019 24891
30/33
TGS• No
Papaya ringspot virus
8/13/2019 24891
31/33
1991: First transgenic PRSV-resistant papaya plant
1980s: PRSV-resistance project started under direction of Dennis Gonsalves
1992: PRSV discovered in Puna district
1992: First field trials PRSV-resistant papaya plants
1994: USDA granted permission for large scale field trials
1995-97: Approvals for release from USDA, EPA, FDA
1992-1977: PRVS spread; many farmers went out of business
1998: Seeds released, free of charge, to growers
2000: Papaya industry bounced back; crop back to pre-1995 levels
Papaya ringspot virus
8/13/2019 24891
32/33
http://www.apsnet.org/education/feature/papaya/Top.htm
Papaya
ringspotvirus
8/13/2019 24891
33/33
Epigenetic mechanisms: plantevolution, defense and development
• Gene silencing is a response to gene duplication(evolution of duplicated genes; transposon control)
• Gene silencing is a response to gene overexpression(dosage compensation)
• Gene silencing is a defense response(viral cross protection; rapid environmental responses)
• Epigenetic mechanisms are used in plant development(JAW miRNA in leaf morphogenesis)