Upload
stephanie-clarke
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3D scattering of electrons from nuclei
Finding the distribution of charge (protons) and matter in the nucleus
[Sec. 3.3 & 3.4 Dunlap]
The Standford Linear Accelerator, SLAC
Electron scattering at Stanford 1954 - 57
Professor Hofstadter’s group worked here at SLAC during the 1960s and were the first to find out about the charge distribution of protons in the nucleus – using high energy electron scattering.
1961 Nobel Prize winner
cA linear accelerator LINAC was used to accelerate the electrons
Electron scattering experiments at SLAC 1954 - 57
e-
Why use electrons?• Why not alpha’s or protons or neutrons?• Why not photons?
Alphas, protons or neutrons have two disadvantages
(1) They are STRONGLY INTERACTING – and the strong force between nucleons is so mathematically complex (not simple 1/r2) that interpreting the scattering data would be close to impossible.
(2) They are SIZEABLE particles (being made out of quarks). They have spatial extent – over ~1F. For this reason any diffraction integral would have to include an integration over the “probe” particle too.
Photons have a practical disadvantage: They could only be produced at this very high energy at much greater expense. First you would have to produce high energy electrons, then convert these into high energy positrons – which then you have to annihilate. And even then your photon flux would be very low. Energy analysis of photons after scattering would be also very difficult.
Why use electrons?• Why not alpha’s or protons or neutrons?• Why not photons?
Electrons are very nice for probing the nucleus because:
(1) They are ELECTRO-MAGNETICALLY INTERACTING – and the electric force takes a nice precise mathematical form (1/r2)
(2) They are POINT particles (<10-3 F – probably much smaller). [Like quarks they are considered to be “fundamental” particles (not composites)]
(3) They are most easily produced and accelerated to high energies
Concept of Cross-section
Case for a single nucleus where particle projectile is deterministic
Case for multiple nuclei where projectile path is not known.
The effective area is the all important thing – this is the Cross-Section.
Nuclear unit = 1 b = 1 barn = 10-24cm-2 = 10-28m-2 = 100 F2
Rutherford scattering of negatively charged particles
Alpha scattering
Electron scattering
2csc.
)4(22csc.
16
1 4
2
200
242
0
m
Zzes
d
d
2csc
)4(24
2
200
2
m
Ze
d
d
Rutherford scattering of negatively charged relativistic particles
2sin1.
2csc
2
. 22
204
2
20
cm
cZ
d
d
137
1
)4( 0
2
c
e
Fine structure constant
2sin1.
2csc
2
. 22
204
2
0
cp
cZ
d
d
Which for extreme relativistic electrons becomes:
2cos.
2csc
2
. 24
2
pc
cZ
d
d c0
2sin1.
2csc
)4(22
2
204
2
200
2
cm
Ze
d
d
Extra relativistic kinematic factor
Z<<1
22242
222 )(
2cos
2csc
4
)(.
fZT
cZ
d
d
Mott
TEpc
More forward directed distribution
Known as Mott scattering
Mott Scattering
2cos
2csc.
4
1 242
22
T
cZ
d
d
Mott
Mott differential scatteringTake the nucleus to have point charge Ze - e being the charge on the proton.
If that charge is spread out then an element of charge d(Ze) at a point r will give rise to a contribution to the amplitude of
im efdrd ).(.)()(
Where is the extra “optical” phase introduced by wave scattering by the element of charge at the point r compared to zero phase for scattering at r=0
r
dΨ
chargeunit per angleat amplitude scatteringMott theis )( where
)(.)(2
cos2
csc4
)(.
222242
222
m
mmMott
f
fZfZT
cZ
d
d
But the Nucleus is an Extended Object
Wavefront of incident electron
Wavefront of electron scattered at angle
)(
NOTE: All points on plane AA’ have the same phase when seen by observer at
Can you see why?
Wavefront of incident electron
Wavefront of electron scattered at angle
)(
The extra path length for P2P2’ 2
sin..2
OX
2sin)(2
2sin2
kpp
p
The phase difference for P2P2’
rq
rprp
OXkOX
.
.cos
2sin..22
sin..22
/.rp
r
FINDING THE PHASE
rcos
Wavefront of incident electron
Wavefront of electron scattered at angle
)(dp
r
THE DIFFRACTION INTEGRAL
Charge in this volume element is: ddrrdrdq .sin).().( 2
The wave amplitude d at is given by: )(..sin)( /.2 fedddrrrd rpi
Amount of wave
Phase factor Mott scattering
THE DIFFRACTION INTEGRAL The wave amplitude d at is given by: )(..sin)( /.2 fedddrrrd rpi
Amount of wave Phase factor Mott scattering
The no of particles scattered at angle is then proportional to:
2322])([)()( rFTf
From which we find: 2)(f
Form Factor F(q)
Eq (3.14)
The total amplitude of wave going at angle is then:
2
0 0 0
3/. )()()()()(r
rpi rFTfdVerf
Eq (3.15)
Mott
Mott
d
dpF
d
d
d
drFT
d
d
2
23
)]/([
)(
The effect of diffractive interference
p
dd
2)/( pF Mott
From nucleus due to wave interference
Fig 3.6 450 MeV e- on 58Ni
128.2
.197
450
F
FMeV
MeV
c
Ek
c
Ekp
Additional Maths for a hard edge nucleusWe can get a fairly good look at the form factor for a nucleus by approximating the nucleus to a sharp edge sphere:
dedrrr
ZdVer
ZpF
r
rpirpi
2
0 0 0 0 0
/cos.2/. .sin).(2
)(1
)/(
p
q )(cos).(2)(0 0
cos2
dedrrrqF iqr
2
20
0
0
2
0
)(
cossin3
cossin14
.sin4
.sin
)(4
qR
qRqRqR
qR
qRqRqRqZq
drqrrZq
drrqr
qrr
ZR
0
r=R0
30 4
.3
R
Z
2sin22
sin2
tan
)(
cossin3)(
2
kpp
q
qRqR
qR
qRqRqR
qRqF
Condition of zeros
4.5 7.7 11 14
Spherical Bessel Function of order 3/2
qR
Wavenumber mom transfer
Fig 3.6 450 MeV e- on 58Ni
1.1xR=4.5 R=4.1F
1.8xR=7.7 R=4.3F
2.6xR=11 R=4.2F
Proton distributions
Mass distributions
Z
Nr
rrr
P
NP
1)(
)()()(
The Woods-Saxon Formula
0
0
( )1 exp ( ) /
rr R a
R0=1.2 x A1/3 (F)
0.52 0.01a F
t is width of the surface region of a nucleus; that is, the distance over which the density drops from 90% of its central value to 10% of its central value
)()(
)()(
3
3
qFFTr
rFT
dddd
qF
Mott
nucleus
Charge distributions can also be obtained by Inverse Fourier Transformation of the Form Factor F(q)