811.163.41367.62537 811.163.41373.611

. * ,

**

. - ( /-/ , // , - , // ), .

: , , .

1. , - . , , - (. , , .; . ). , , , - .

1.1. O - ? , (. 2; 1, 1.1), - , / . ,

* e-mail: draganavs@yahoo.com** . 178006, :

, , , - .

. 498

, , 1 .

1.2. , . - , . , (. 2008: 159160) , , , .

1.

1. - , - .

1.1. - ; , . ( ), (. 2011: 6265).

1.2. . , - e ( , , ) () ( 2011: 142154). - ( ), ; , (. , . , , 2004: 38, 76). ,

1 , . - , , : , , (,fuzzy), (,soft logic), , , , , ( -, , , , , ...)... ( 2009: 1920).

499

.2 , -, , , .

2. , , , (). , - , , , , , .

3. , . , , . , , , , , - .

2. : , , ,

1. , . , , , , , .

1.1. 2012. .3 106 (01) .4

2 , , - : .

3 . , .

4 ( 8 ), , , - , , , , .

106 ; (4) - 86 , ; 129 , / -, , , (1. - /, 2. // / , 3. / ; . 4).

. 500

2. () , () , () - , () .

2.1. - , , , , , . ( 1 10) (, , , -, , , , ).5 (, , , , , , , ) , , . () () (-, -, -, -, -, -, -).

2.2. , , . -6, , .

2.3. , , . , , , , -

5 , - , . , -, . , - ( 1955/56: 9092).

6 , , , : (1) : . . , ; . , ; . . ; (2) : . . : ; . . : ; , -; . . ; . . ; . . . : ; . . : ; 1. . , , . . ); (3) : . . : , ; , . , , ; (4) : . . ; . . ; . . ; . 1. . , , .

501

, ( ) .7

3.

1. , - . , , . - (62,97%), - (31,37%).

1.1. : (, , , -, , ), (. 6), . . , , (85,85%), (11,32%), ( /2/, /1/) -, , ( . , , . 1.).

1.2. - (. 2000), (. , .), . , , , -, , -, . , -- , - .

1.3. - - (, ), -, . 2 . , , , , . - , , . (), :

7 , , , , .

. 502

. , , . , ( , , ).

2. , . . : , . - . , , . ( 2008: 179).

, , - ().

2.1. , . , (. - , . 4; 4.1), (. 3). , , - .

2.1.1. , , , , , - .

2.2. , , , , . 2 8, - , . , .

2.2.1. () , - . .

8 ; , , , .

503

- -. - -9, -, - - .

2.3. -, , . (. 10).

- , , - :

: () () . . : 1 ). (. . ). (. . 3, 194). . . . ). , (. . 1, 132). . . , .), , . , (. 1, 94).

: . . . , , ! . . . ; . . [] , , . . . . . . , , ! . .

2.3.1. - - (. //), . , , ( : ) , , .

2.3.2. . --, : -- , -, , . : < ( 1955/56: 90; . : . . : .).10

9 -, , , ( 20), , --, - (. (), , () .).

10 , ( , , , , ... , , .), , . - , . , , , , , , . - . :

. 504

3. , (, ) (. //, //, // .), .

3.1. , - , ( ), . , , / ( 39,62%, 25,47%). , , , : (23,58%), (4,72%), / (4,72%), (2,83%), (2,83%), (1,89%) ( 40,57%).

3.2. : / 27 (25,47%), (8,49%), , , . , : (13,21%), (5,66%), (4,71%), (3,77%), (2,83%).

3.3. , , , , , . - , .

3.3.1. . / / , - : (24,53%), (7,55%), (6,60%), (5,66%), (3,77%), / (3,77%), (0,94%) ( 52,82%), / ( / / ) (5,66%), (2,83%), (2,83%), (1,89%), (0,94%), (0,94%), (0,94%) ( 16,03%). ) (16,98%), , . , , (. /, , ; . 3).

4. 86 , , 129 .

, , , , . - ( 1955/56: 92).

505

, - 4.

4.1. () , (56 . 43,41%), () , (55 . 42,64%). . - , (.: , , ; , , ; , , , .).

4.2. / (18 . 13,95%). (, , ), , (. , , , , ). / , . , , / (. 3; 3.1).

4.

1. , (- , , 2004: 247, 53; . 21991: 78) ( . 21991: 36) : ( ) , , .

1.1. , , . , , , . , , , , ., , . - , (. . , , , .).

1.1.1. . -; , ,

. 506

() , .

2. , . - , - , . , ( ), , , (. 1988: 133137).

2.1. -, -, -, - .11 , , , , , , // . , , - , , , .

3. 12 : , , . . , , , .13

11 -, -, , - (. -: , ), , .: (), - () . . : ); . . : -; (). , ), ) . . (. . . : I)) , (. . . . : I); -, . , , (, .)), -, , , , - .

12 : . 1. . , , ; - , . . , . 2. . , , - , , , , . 4. . , , , .

13 , , , , , - , , . :

() ... , , , (. , , 129).

507

3.1. , - . , . , , .:

: () . . ). . . . . . ... ... -. . . . ... ... . . .: () . . : ). , (. 10, 85).

3.2. ; , - . , , - , ( , . , .), .

3.3. , . . - .14

3.3.1. - -, -, - . , , , ( )15; , .

() (. . ): ... , ... , . . 1970. () (-

) , , ., . , : , , . - . () (. 1988: 135).

14 - , . -, - (. , ). , , , - (. , // .), ( ) .

15 , , ( 1997: 135), , , , , , (. -

. 508

4. / , . (). - /, / /.

4.1. (. . , -, ; , .).

- , , (-) , (. -). , , . , , , , . : () , () , -, () , /.

4.2. , (- -). , , , .

4.3. , , . - , . < ( ), ( ) , / . , , , (. : . . 1. : ; () . . : ) .).

2011: 103104). , , , , (. , , .) , , , . , , , . , -, (/ , , ).

509

4.4. -; (. , , .) , , , , (. , , . 2004: 478479, 490).

4.5. - , , , : ; () , - .

4.5.1. , . . . , - , - , / / .16 - (. , .).

5. -, , , - , .

5.1. (. (), , , .); , , , , . : (, ) .

6. .

6.1. , , . , ,

16 -, -, - (. , , // .), .

. 510

, / .

6.2. , , , , (. ). , - (. , , .; 2011: 5659), .

6.2.1. , , , (): - . , . , , - ; , , .

1.

54 (50,94%) 41 (38,68%) 6 (5,66%) 2 (1,89%) 2 (1,89%) 1 (0,94%)

91 (85,85%) 12 (11,32%) 2 (1,89%) 1 (0,94%)

58 (54,72%) 46 (43,39%) 2 (1,89%)

64 (60,38%) 18 (16,98%) 16 (15,10% ) 7 (6,60%) 1 (0,94%)

1.

- 62,97%

- 31,37%-

( )3,30%

-( )

1,65%

- 0,47%- 0,24%

511

2

1 10

8,05 7,43 5,86 5,22

4,52 3,85 3,47 3,00

3

, ( - ; )

() 30 (28,30%), 15 (14,15%), 12 (11,32%), 9 (8,49%), / 10 (9,43%), 3 (2,83%), 3, 3, 4 (3,77%), 2 (1,89%), 2, 2, 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.

() 42 (39,62%), / 16 (15,09%), 14 (13,21%), / 7 (6,60%), 6 (5,66%), 6, 4 (3,77%), 3 (2,83%), 2 (1,89%), 2, 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, 1.

() 48 (45,28%), 23 (21,70%), 8 (7,55%), 5 (4,71%), 3 (2,83%), 3, 2 (1,89%), 2, 2, 2, 2, / 2, 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, 1.

() 44 (41,51%), 10 (9,43%), 8 (7,55%), - 7 (6,60%), 7, 7, 6 (5,66%), 3 (2,83%), 3, 3, 2 (1,89%), 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, - 1, 1, 1.

26 (24, 53%), () 18 (16,98%), / 9 (8,49%), - 8 (7,55%), 7 (6,60%), 6 (5,66%), 6, 4 (3,77%), / 4, 3 (2,83%), 3, 3, - 2 (1,89%), 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.

/ 42 (39,62%), 25 (23,58%), () 5 (4,72%), 5, 5, 5, / 5, 3 (2,83%), 3, 2 (1,89%), 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.

() 36 (33,96%), 15 (14,15%), 8 (7,55%), -/ 8, 7 (6,60%), 4 (3,77%), 3 (2,83%), 3, 2 (1,89%), 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, / 2, 1 (0,94%), 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.

. 512

/ 27 (25,47%), 14 (13,21%), () 12 (11,32%), 9 (8,49%), 9, 7 (6,60%), 6 (5,66%), - 5 (4,71%), 4 (3,77%), 3 (2,83%), 2 (1,89%), 2, 2, 2, 1 (0,94%), 1.

4 ()

()

()

/

/

/ , , , , - , / , , , , , , , .

, - , , , ( )/ -/, -, , , .

, , , , , , , , -, .

56 (43,41%) 55 (42,64%) 18 (13,95%)

2011: , , : .

155/56: , , XX, 4596.

1: , , , . 6, , 131139.

15: , , - L, 130.

17: Carlos nchauralde, Space, reference, and emotional involment, in: S. Niemeier & R. irven eds. The Language of Emotions, Conceptualization, expresion, and theoretical foundation, 135154, Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

2004: Laura A. Janda, A metaphor in search of a source domain: The categories of Slavic aspect, Cognitive Linguistics 15/4, 471527.

2004: uka Klikovac, Metafore u miljenju i jeziku, Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek / Knjiara Krug.

. 211: George Lakoff, Jane Espenson, Alan Schwartz, Master etaphor List, Berkeley: University of California.

513

200: , , : .

200: , , : .

: (http://korpus.matf.bg.ac.rs/). 2000: , , :

, , .

2005: , , : , .

: , V, : (19671976).

: (. XV), : , (19592010).

2007: (. ), : .

ragana . Veljkovi Stankovi

COGNTVE ASPECTS OF VERB MNUTON N SERBAN LANGUAGE

S u m m a r y

The author considers verb diminution as formative-semantical modification based on the concepts of fragmentation and limitation (ACTON S /A YNAMC/ ENTTY, MANNER OF ACTON S FORM OF /A YNAMC/ ENTTY; MNUTON S FRAGMENTATON OF ENTTY, VERB MNUTON S TEMPORAL AN ACTON FRAGMENTATON OF A MOTVE VERB ACTON, FRAGMENTATON S A ECREASE OF /COHERENT/ EN-TTY), from which their meanings with rich adverbial inscripts arise.

The results of survey at the Belgrade Faculty of Philology and researching on suffixally formed deverbatives led to the following conclusions: (a) decreased dynamics and intensity of diminutive verbs in most cases relate to temporal segmentation and/or to partial or incomplete performing; (b) the concept of fragmentation is logically linked with diminution, for inco-herence of action leads to a conceptualization of verb diminutives as a number of individual acts (fragmentation multiplication intensification decrease); (c) a significant influence on profiling of adverbial set comes from denotative meaning of motive verb and typical active sce-nario of an action expressed by a diminutive verb, which is not the same in all deverbative di-minutives; (d) diminutive verbs sememe small is adverbal and more amorphous than for other evaluatives for not only many quantifiers are read in it, but also those bringing into the derivatve sematic data for different action modalities; (e) a basical inhibitor of emotional evaluation in

. 514

diminutive verbs is a conceptualization of an action as an abstract entity: since the abstract enti-ties have an unlimited extension thus denying the access to HUMAN EMOTONAL AREA.

However, these ostensible lacks are compensated by diminutive verbs with their variety of adverbial determiners; they provide expressiveness and simultaneous arousing the whole set of attenuators providing the fuzziness and also adjustability of diminutive verbs to different contexts.