5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    1/26

    Clinical Practice Guideline on the Use of5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors or Prostate

    Cancer Chemoprevention

    American Society of Clinical

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    nco ogy mer can ro og ca ssoc at on

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    2/26

    ASCO Health Services Committee, ASCO Cancer

    ,

    Urological Association (AUA) Practice Guidelines

    American Urological Association (AUA) and ASCO

    commissioned a S stematic Review Wilt et al. 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for prostate cancerchemoprevention: a systematic review of the

    evidence regarding effectiveness and adverseeffects. (Cochrane Database of Systematic

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    3/26

    Systematic Review

    Wilt et al. completed a review and analysis of data publishedthrough December 2006

    9MEDLINE

    9PreMedlineoc rane o a ora on rary

    9Reviews

    9Personal files

    *Additional search in April 2007 of MEDLINE/PreMEDLINE (yielded no relevant results)

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    4/26

    Guideline Methodology(contd): Panel Members

    Barnett Kramer, MD, Co-Chair National Institutes of Health

    Paul Schellhammer, MD, Co-Chair Eastern Virginia Medical School

    Stewart Justman, Ph.D., PatientRepresentative

    University of Montana Liberal Studies

    Peter C. Albertsen, MD University of Connecticut Health Center

    William J. Blot, PhD International Epidemiology Institute

    H. Ballentine Carter, MD Johns Hopkins University

    Joseph P. Costantino, PhD National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel

    Project

    Jonathan I. Epstein, MD Johns Hopkins University

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    5/26

    Guideline Methodology(contd): Panel Members

    Paul Godley, MD, PhD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

    usse . arr s, n vers y o or aro na a ape

    Timothy J. Wilt, M.D., MPH University of Minnesota School of

    Medicine, v

    Robin Zon, MD Michiana Hematology Oncology

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    6/26

    2008 Recommendations for Use of 5- Reductase Inhibitors for

    Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention

    OverarchingClinical Question

    Should men routinely be offered a 5-Alphae uc ase n or or e

    chemoprevention of prostate cancer?

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    7/26

    -Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention

    Clinical Questions

    A. What is the impact of 5--reductase inhibitors on the risk

    of incident prostate cancer, prostate cancer mortality, and

    overall mortality? Do benefits and harms of 5--re uc ase n ors vary among en a e

    subpopulations (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, family history,

    baseline risk for rostate cancer and b t e of 5--

    reductase inhibitor?

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    8/26

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    9/26

    2008 Recommendations for Use of 5- Reductase Inhibitors for

    Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention

    C. What is the impact of 5--reductase inhibitors on theneed for treatment for benign prostatic disease?

    D. What is the impact of 5--reductase inhibitors on qualityof life? What are other potential harms and side effects

    of 5--reductase inhibitors? What are other potentialene s o , an n ca ons or, --re uc ase n or

    use (e.g., benign prostatic hyperplasia, male baldness)?

    E. How long should treatment continue for the best outcome

    per o vs. e ongF. What are the future directions of research regarding 5--

    reductase inhibitors for the prevention of prostate

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    cancer

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    10/26

    Primary Source of Evidence rostate ancer revent on r a

    N = 18,882

    Design endpoint of period prevalence* Finasteride administered for 7 years

    Participant characteristics

    No prior prostate cancer Asymptomatic or, at most, mild lower urologic

    symptoms

    < ng m Normal DRE*

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    prostate cancer over trial period

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    11/26

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    12/26

    In a group of 1000 men, treatment with finasteride

    decrease of 15 cases ,

    increased cases of high-grade (Gleason score 8-

    10) from 18 to 21; an increase of 3 cases Both courses above are seven years

    NNT to revent one case of rostate cancer b

    treating for 7 years with finasteride = 71

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    13/26

    Question A: What is impact on risk of incident prostate cancer,

    prostate cancer morta ty, an or overa morta ty re t ere

    differences by identifiable subpopulations?

    esponse v ence

    Relative decrease in period prevalence = 26%

    Absolute risk reduction = 1.4%

    Trials not powered to show mortality difference, no difference found

    o erences oun among eren races e n c es , ages,baseline risks or family histories of prostate cancer

    * -

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    14/26

    Clinical Questions and

    Findings Question B: Are there differential effects on

    differences in grades/stages? What is applicability ofGleason histologic grading system?

    Secondary analysis of PCPT found increase of 3cases of hi h- rade rostate cancer er 1000 men

    Difference of opinion on explanation of this finding

    Until the explanation of finding known, decisions

    regarding the natural history of the disease anddecisions regarding treatment interventions shouldbe based on the histolo ic information obtained on

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    biopsy regardless of 5-ARI status

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    15/26

    Clinical Questions and

    Findings

    benign prostatic disease

    5-ARIs are established, FDA-approved treatments for

    From PCPT

    Reduces urinary retention RR = .67

    Reduces transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    16/26

    Clinical Questions and

    Findings uestion D: What is im act on QOL? What are other

    potential benefits/harms, other indications

    Response/evidence:

    Erectile Dysfunction 2-4% increase

    Decreases in ejaculate volume 1.3-2.9% Gynecomastia 1.6-3.11%

    Decreased libido 1-4%

    Decrease in PSA

    Male Pattern Baldness 50 years, 50% decrease in PSA

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    an mg s m ar o mgs a year o ow-up s ng estudy).

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    17/26

    Clinical Questions and

    Findings uestion E: What is o timal treatment duration?

    Response/evidence: Guideline recommends seven year duration for primary

    prevention for Finasteride (PCPT)

    Trial using four year administration of dutasteride is

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    18/26

    regular screening for prostate cancer. The- ,

    including finasteride, on the risk of

    not being actively screened is therefore not

    .

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    19/26

    Future Directions of Research

    - Establish effect on prostate cancer morbidity and

    Establishing optimal dose 1 mg versus 5 mg - -

    ARIs which would trigger a biopsy

    Establish the role of 5-ARIs for men not activelyreceiving screening

    Establish the most effectivene means of

    commun ca on or men cons er ng e use o a -ARI

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    molecular data

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    20/26

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    21/26

    , .

    oug e ma or y o e ane u ge a e

    observed higher incidence of high-grade (Gleason8-10 cancer in the finasteride rou is likel dueto confounding factors, the increased incidence of

    high-grade cancer as a result of induction by the.benefits accruing from the drug are reduction ofthe risk of urinar retention and need for sur ical

    intervention. Harms include sexual side effects,which usually diminish with time.

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    22/26

    Strategies to Improve Doctor-

    Patient Communication-.

    these agents reduce the incidence of prostatecancer and be sure to be clear that these

    agents do not reduce the risk of prostate

    cancer to zero;

    2. Discuss the elevated rate of high-grade cancer

    observed in the PCPT and inform men of thepotential explanations;

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    23/26

    Strate ies to Im rove Doctor-Patient Communication, contd..

    term effects of 5-ARIs on prostate cancerincidence exists beyond about seven years-

    prostate cancer mortality or increases life

    expectancy remains unknown;

    4. Inform men of possible but reversible sexual

    5. Inform men of the likely improvement in lower

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

    .

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    24/26

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    25/26

    This full text of the guideline, this slide set, and a doctor-

    patient discussion guide are available at:http://www.asco.org/guidelines/5ari/

    Access the cancer.net website for a Patient Guide and

    other patient-friendly information at http://www.cancer.net

    American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008

  • 7/31/2019 5 ARI Slides 2.10.09

    26/26