Upload
faisalrhman
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
1/91
GMS ©
Ganda M. Simangunsong
Fakultas Teknik Pertambangan & Perminyakan ITB
6. Underground Blast Design
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
2/91
GMS ©
Introduction
• There are two reasons to go underground andexcavate:
1. to use the excavated space, e.g. for storage,transport etc.
2. to use the excavated material, e.g. mining andquarrying operations.
• In both cases tunneling forms an integral part of theentire operation.
• The main difference between tunnel blasting andbench blasting is that tunnel blasting is done towardsone free surface while bench blasting is done towardstwo or more free surface.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
3/91
GMS ©
Introduction (cont.)
Underground vs. Open Pit Blast Design:
– One free face – explosive consumption is higher thanopen pit blast design
– Environmental constraint – toxic fumes
– Small burden at area of Cut – „Desensitization 75-200 mm; and sympathetic detonation
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
4/91
GMS ©
Introduction (cont.)
Open Pit Blast Design ?
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
5/91
GMS ©
Introduction (cont.)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
6/91
GMS ©
Blasting Round
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
7/91GMS ©
Look Out
Empirical guidance
L = 10 cm + 3 cm/m X Hole depth
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
8/91GMS ©
CUT
Various types of Cut (Langefors & Kihlström, 1978)
• Wedge cut or V-cut
• Pyramid or diamond cut
• Drag cut
• Fan cut
• Burn cut
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
9/91GMS ©
Wedge Cut or V Cut
• Blasthole are drilled at an angle to theface in a uniform wedge formation sothat the axis of symmetry is at thecentre line of the face.
• The cut displaces a wedge of rock out
of the face in the initial blast and thiswedge is widened to the full width ofthe drift in subsequent blasts, eachblast being fired with detonators ofsuitable delay time.
• This type of cut is particularly suitedto large size drifts, which have welllaminated or fissured rocks. Holeplacement should be carefullypreplanned and the alignment of each
hole should be accurately drilled.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
10/91GMS ©
Pyramid or Diamond Cut
• The pyramid or diamondcut is a variation of thewedge cut where theblastholes for the initial
cavity may have a line ofsymmetry alonghorizontal axis as well as
the vertical axis
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
11/91GMS ©
Drag Cut
• The drag cut is particularly suitable in small sectionaldrifts where a pull of up to 1 m is very useful
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
12/91GMS ©
Fan Cut
• The fan cut is one-halfof a wedge cut and isapplicable mainly where
only one machine isemployed in a narrowdrive.
• Generally the depth ofpull obtainable is limited
to 1.5 m
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
13/91GMS ©
Burn Cut•
A series of parallel holes aredrilled closely spaced at rightangles to the face. One hole ormore at the centre of the faceare uncharged. This is called theburn cut.
• The uncharged holes are often oflarger diameter than the chargedholes and form zones ofweakness that assist theadjacent
charged holes in breaking out theground.
• Since all holes are at right angles to the face, hole placementand alignment are easier than in other types of cuts. The burncut is particularly suitable for use in massive rock such as
granite, basalt etc.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
14/91GMS ©
Rock factor, c
Q = 0.3 kg/m3
C = 1.2Q = 0.36
Example
Ø= 32 mm
B
1.3BB=K= 0.5-1.0 m
0-1 m
The rock constant is an empirical measure of the
amount of explosive needed for loosening 1 m3 of rock
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
15/91GMS ©
Rock Factor, c
c?
t?
RMR ?
C = 0.50 + 2.60( t/ c)0.5 + 13 t/ c, kg/m
3
For first trial C=0.4 kg/m3
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
16/91
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
17/91GMS ©
Process (cuts)
B1
A1
B2
A2• Define reamer/uncharged hole
• Define 1st cut
• Define 2nd cut andothers
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
18/91
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
19/91
GMS ©
Process (1st Cut)
6. Define stemming length, hs
hs = 10 d
7. End
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
20/91
GMS ©
Process (2nd Cut …)
1. Define opening width from the 1st cut, A1
A1 = 20.5 B1
2. Define 2nd burden, B2
B2 = 8.8 x 10-2 [(A1 l WSRANFO)0.5]/ d c
3. Define stemming, hs
hs = 10 d
4. Sub End
5. Repeat point 1 to 3 to find geometry of 3rd cut andso on until the opening width is less than the squareroot of advance (=I0.5) or Burden stoping/lifter .
6. End
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
21/91
GMS ©
Process (Lifters)
1. Define corrected rock factor, c‟
c‟ = c + 0.05 …… Bn>1.4
c‟ = c + 0.07/B …… Bn
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
22/91
GMS ©
Process (Stoping)1. Define corrected rock factor, c‟
c‟ = c + 0.05 …… Bn>1.4
c‟ = c + 0.07/B …… Bn
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
23/91
GMS ©
Process (Contours)
If normal, follow geometry of the downward stoping
If smooth blasting is required, :
1. Define spacing, S
S = (15-16) d
2. Defind burden, B
B = S/0.8
3. Defind charge concentration, l l = 90 d2
4. No stemming is required (fully charged)
5. End
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
24/91
GMS ©
Hole types Numberof holes
Charge perhole
Totalcharge
1st cut
2nd cut
3rd-4th cut
Lifters
Roof
Wall
Stoping
4
4
8
5
8
6
5
1.59
2.62
3.76
3.20
1.77
3.20
3.20
6.37
10.48
29.36
16.00
14.16
19.20
16.00
Total charge
Opening areaAdvance
Specific charge
Total number of holes
Hole depth
Specific drilling
111.6 kg
19.5 m23.0 m
1.9 kg/m3
40
3.2 m
2.2 m/m3
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
25/91
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
26/91
GMS ©
Faktor Perencanaan Cut
• Diameter lubang besar (kosong)
• Burden
• Charge concentration
•
Ketepatan pemboran, terutama untuk lubang-lubangledak paling dekat dengan lubang besar/kosong
• Bila menggunakan beberapa lubang kosong, hitungdahulu diameter lubang samaran (fictious diameter )
D = d√n
• D = diameter lubang samaran
• d = diameter lubang kosong
• n = jumlah lubang
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
27/91
GMS ©
Kemajuan Per Round
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
28/91
GMS ©
Perhitungan
• Agar peledakan berhasil dengan baik (cleaned blast ),
jarak antara lubang ledak dengan lubang kosong,
tidak boleh lebih besar daripada 1,5 lubang kosong.
• Apabila jaraknya lebih besar hanya akan menimbulkan
kerusakan (breakage) dan jika jaraknya terlalu dekat
ada kemungkinan lubang ledak bertemu denganlubang besar kosong
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
29/91
GMS ©
a < 1,5 lubang kosong – cleaned blast
a > 1,5 - kerusakan breakage
a 50 ms
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
30/91
GMS ©
Jarak lubang tembak ke lubangkosong
a = 1,5• a = jarak antara titik pusat lingkaran lubang besar
dengan lubang tembak• b = diameter lubang besar
• Jika gunakan beberapa lubang kosong,
a = 1,5 D• D = diameter samaran
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
31/91
GMS ©
Pemuatan Lubang Tembak DalamBujursangkar Pertama
• Muatan BP (charge concentration) sedikit → batuan
tidak akan terbongkar.
• Muatan BP banyak tidak akan terjadi blow out melalui
lubang kosong sehingga terjadi pemadatan kembalibatuan yang telah terpecahkan dan efisiensi
kemajuan rendah.
• Kebutuhan muatan BP untuk berbagai jarak C-C
(pusat ke pusat) antara lubang kosong dan lubangtembak terdekat dapat dihitung menggunakan grafik
berikut
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
32/91
GMS ©
Muatan BP Fungsi Jarak Pusat – PusatLubang Untuk Berbagai Diameter Lubang
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
33/91
GMS ©
Perhitungan Untuk BujursangkarSelanjutnya
• Perhitungan bujursangkar dalam cut yang tersisa sama denganbujursangkar pertama. Peledakan pada bujursangkar sisamengarah ke bukaan segiempat bukan bukaan sirkular. Sudutledakan (angle of break ) jangan terlalu kecil.
• Dalam perhitungan “burden” (B) sama dengan lebar (W) dari
bukaan:
B = W
• Dengan grafik perkirakan muatan bahan peledak minimum danburden maksimum untuk bermacam-macam lebar bukaan.Muatan bahan peledak ini adalah muatan untuk semua kolom
lubang tembak.• Apabila diperlukan peledakan pada bagian dasar yang susah
diledakkan (constricted bottom) harus digunakan muatan dasaryang besarnya dua kali charge concentration (lc) dan tingginya1,5 B.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
34/91
GMS ©
Muatan Fungsi Burden MaksimumUntuk Berbagai Lebar Bukaan
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
35/91
GMS ©
Stemming Cut
• Panjang kolom lubang bor yang tidak diisi bahan peledak.
ho = 0,5 B
•
Perhitungan berikut utk lubang tembak 38 mm …
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
36/91
GMS ©
Merencanakan Cut
Bujursangkar I
• a = 1,5
• W1 = a √2
mm 76 89 102 127 159
a mm 110 130 150 190 230
W1 mm 150 180 210 270 320
Bujursangkar II
• B1 = W1
• C – C = 1,5 W1
• W2 = 1,5 W1 √2
mm 76 89 102 127 159
W1 mm 150 180 210 270 320
C-C mm 225 270 310 400 480
W2 mm 320 380 440 560 670
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
37/91
GMS ©
Merencanakan Cut
Bujursangkar III
• B2 = W2
• C – C = 1,5 W2
• W3 = 1,5 W2 √2
mm 76 89 102 127 159
W2 mm 320 380 440 560 670
C – C 480 570 660 840 1.000
W3 mm 670 800 930 1.180 1.400
Bujursangkar IV
• B3 = W 3
• C – C = 1,5 W3
• W4 = 1,5 W3 √2
mm 76 89 102 127 159
W3 mm 320 380 440 560 670C – C 480 570 660 840 1.000
W4 mm 670 800 930 1.180 1.400
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
38/91
GMS ©
Geometri Bujursangkar
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
39/91
GMS ©
Round Stoping & Contour
• Lubang lantai (floor holes)
• Lubang dinding (wall holes)
• Lubang atap (roof holes)
• Lubang stoping arah pemecahan ke atas danhorisontal
• Lubang stoping arah pemecahan ke bawah
• Untuk menghitung burden (B) dan muatan untuk
bermacam-macam bagian dari round dan Contour dapat dipakai grafik berikut …
Burden Fungsi Muatan BP Pada Berbagai
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
40/91
GMS ©
Burden Fungsi Muatan BP Pada BerbagaiDiameter Lubang Tembak & Jenis BP
G t i P b & P l d k R d
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
41/91
GMS ©
Geometri Pemboran & Peledakan Round -Normal Profile Blasting
Part of time
round
Burden
(m)
Spacing
(m)
Height bottom
charge
(m)
Charge concentration
Stemming
(m)Bottom
(kg/m)
(Column)
(kg/m)
Floor 1 x B 1.1 x B 1/3 x H lb 1.0 x lb 0.2 x B
Wall 0.9 x B 1.1 x B 1/6 x H lb 0.4 x lb 0.5 x B
Roof 0.9 x B 1.1 x B 1/6 x H lb 0.3 x lb 0.5 x B
Stoping :
Upwards 1 x B 1.1 x B 1/3 x H lb 0.5 x lb 0.5 x B
Horisontal 1 x B 1.1 x B 1/3 x H lb 0.5 x lb 0.5 x B
Downwards 1 x B 1.2 x B 1/3 x H lb 0.5 x lb 0.5 x B
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
42/91
GMS ©
Number of Holes
Check – Recheck!
Sumber: USACE, 1997
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
43/91
GMS ©
Specific Charge
Check – Recheck!
Sumber: USACE, 1997
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
44/91
GMS ©
Initiation Sequence
• The Cut is fired using millisecond delay. Since the rockremoved between each hole in the cut and the centralempty hole must be blown out to provide expansion roomfor the rock removed by the next charge, a long enoughinterval between these holes is needed.
• The recommended delay is 75 - 100 millliseconds.
• 1st and 2nd cuts are recommended to adopt one dalayper hole. Other holes are fired with one delay for twoholes.
• Stoping holes are recommended to adopt 100 – 500milliseconds delay.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
45/91
GMS ©
Typical Initiation (cont.)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
46/91
GMS ©
Initiation Sequence (cont.)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
47/91
GMS ©
Shafts
• Shafts are either driven downwards, sink
shafts/shaft sinking, or upward, raise shafts.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
48/91
GMS ©
Shaft Sinking
• Shaft sinking is one of the most difficult and risky blasting jobs as the work area is normally wet, narrow, and noisy.Furthermore, the drilling and blasting crews are exposed tofalling objects.
• The advance is slow as the rock has to be removed
between each blast with special equipment which haslimited capacity. The blasted rock must be well fragmentedto suit the excavation equipment.
• The design of the cross section of the shaft principallydepends on the quality of the rock. Nowadays most of the
shaft are made with circular cross section which givesbetter distribution of the rock pressure, thus decreasing theneed for reinforcement, especially in deep shafts.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
49/91
GMS ©
Shaft Sinking
• An important requirement in shaftsinking is to provide optimumfragmentation of the rock so thatit can be cleared quickly from the
congested shaft-face area.• Blasting operation is carried out
against gravity, and the scatter of
the broken rock is confined in theshaft. It is common to use
generous distribution ofexplosives hroughout the rockusing a large number of smalldiameter (35 – 42 mm) shotholes.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
50/91
GMS ©
Shaft Sinkingwith benching method
• The most common drilling &blasting methods are benchingand blasting with pyramid cut.
• The benching method is fastand efficient method as the
time-consuming cleaning of thefloor between blast can beminimized. It is easy also tokeep the shaft free from wateras a pump can always be
placed in the lower blasted partof the shaft. The drilling &charging pattern is similar tothat of smaller surface blasting.
Sh f Si ki
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
51/91
GMS ©
Shaft Sinkingwith pyramid cut
• Shaft sinking with pyramidcut is similar to tunnelblasting with V-cuts. Thedrilling is done with a drillring which is composed of
a circular I-beam to whichthe drilling machines arefixed. The drilling may befixed to the shaft wallswith bolts. Due to
construction of the drillring, the cut will beconical.
Sh f Si ki
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
52/91
GMS ©
Shaft Sinkingwith pyramid cut
• The number of holesN required for sinkinga shaft of crosssectional area A in m2
is given by:N = 2.5A + 22
• The drilling patternsfor shaft sinking arebasically the same as
those used intunneling butgenerally the cone cutis favoured
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
53/91
GMS ©
Shaft Sinking
• The explosives used in shaft sinking must always bewater resistant. Even if the ground is dry, the flushingwater from the drilling machines will always stay inthe blastholes.
• The powder factor in shaft sinking is rather high,ranging from 2.0 kg/m3 to 4.0 kg/m3 (Olofsson).
• Nonel type detonators are increasingly preferred forinitiation.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
54/91
GMS ©
Raise Shafts
• Older methods:
– Timbered shafts
– Open shafts – up to 25 m, not recommended
• Modern methods:
– Boliden elevator type Jora
– Alimak Raise Climber
– Longhole drilling
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
55/91
GMS ©
Timbered Shaft
• The rise shaft is driven verticallyand divided into two sections bya timber wall which is extendedbefore each blast.
• When the round is fired, one
section is filled with rock. Theblasted rock will then act as aworking platform for the nextround.
• The second section is used as
ladder-way and fortransportation of equipment, drillsteel, explosive and timber. Theventilation is also placed which iscovered during blasting.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
56/91
GMS ©
Timbered Shaft
• Timbered rise shafts havebeen driven up close to 100m, but normally themaximum height should notexceed 60 m.
• The cross section area isusually 4 m2, and theadvance per round approx.2.2 m.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
57/91
GMS ©
JORA lift method
• 1950‟s Boliden ABdeveloped the JORA lift.
• A large hole, diameter 110to 150 mm, is drilled froman upper level in the center
of the intended shaft.
• The drilling and chargingare carried out fromplatform on the top of thelift cage and some scaling
can be done from the cagewith protection of theplatform.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
58/91
GMS ©
JORA lift method
• The large hole is used as cuthole in the blasting of theround.
• Due to the large size of thecut hole, advances of up to4 m are obtained.
• The area is approx. 4 m2.
• Maximum height is 100 m.
• Free space above the shaft
is needed for the drilling ofthe large hole and forplacing of the lifting gear.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
59/91
GMS ©
ALIMAK raise climber
• Introduced in 1957.
• The equipment consists of a riseclimber with a working platform,which cover practically theentire area of the shaft. Under
the platform there is a cage fortransport of personnel, materialand equipment.
• The rise climber is propelled bya rack and pinion system along
a special guide rail.• The rail system incorporated a
tube system for the air andwater supply of the drillingequipment.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
60/91
GMS ©
ALIMAK raise climber
• The platform is equipped with aprotective roof under which theblaster stands during scaling anddrilling operation.
• The air driven raise climber maybe used for up to 150 m shaftlength, electric drive up to 900 m.For longer shafts diesel-hydraulicdriven climber are used.
•
The area normally 4 m2
, butinclined (60o) shafts have beendriven full face up to 36 m2.
• The long term advance is approx.3.5 m/day or 70-90 m per month.
Sh ft i i
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
61/91
GMS ©
Shaft raisingby long hole drilling
• Drilling is done downwards with parallel holes and thewhole are is drilled at the same time.
• Great precision in drilling and charging is a must and thelack of precision has earlier limited the practical height to25 – 30 m.
• Safe - All drilling and charging work is carried out from safelocation.
• Two different cut are used:
– Large hole cut
–
Crater cut
Long hole d illing
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
62/91
GMS ©
Long hole drillingwith large hole cut
• The large hole cut is still the mostcommon one.
• The drill holes in the round have adiameter of 50 to 75 mm and thecentral large hole is reamed to a
diameter of 102 to 203 mm.• The charging is done from the upper
level. A piece of wood is lowered downon a rope, and when the wood ispasses the lower mouth of the hole
the rope is tightened and the piece ofwood forms a plug for the lower partof the hole.
• The hole should not be stemmed asthe stemming may sinter and block
the hole for the subsequent blast.
Long hole drilling
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
63/91
GMS ©
Long hole drillingwith crater blasting
• The crater blasting is usedonly for the cut section toopen a hole of approx. 1 m2,then normal stoping will
follow.
• The crater consists of fiveholes, one center hole andfour edge holes. The centerhole is blasted first
whereupon the edge holes areblasted one by one withdifferent delays.
Long hole drilling
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
64/91
GMS ©
Long hole drillingwith crater blasting
• Before charging the holesare plugged with apiece ofwood, which is lowered downfrom the upper surface on arope and secured to the
lower surface.• The hole is then filled with
sand to the calculated levelof explosive charge. Thecharge should have a
diameter close to that of thehole.
• The charge is then stemmedwith water.
Long hole drilling
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
65/91
GMS ©
Long hole drillingwith crater blasting
Livingstone‟s theories:
L = 6 x D (mm)
Lopt = 0.5 x Lcrit (mm)
Lcrit = S x Q1/3; (mm);
S : Strain energy (1.5)
Q = (3 x d3 x phi x P)/2; kg;
P : Charging density (kg/liter)
Lopt = 0.5 x S x ((3 x phi x d)/2)1/3 x d x 10 (mm)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
66/91
GMS ©
Ring Blasting
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
67/91
GMS ©
Ring Blasting
Ring Blasting
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
68/91
GMS ©
Ring BlastingToe spacing estimation
• Spacing can be estimated as 2 times fractured zone (S = 2 x Rf )
Damage Zone (Hustrulid, 1999)
Ring Blasting
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
69/91
GMS ©
Ring BlastingDesign Example
Ring Blasting
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
70/91
GMS ©
Ring BlastingDesign Example
Ring Blasting
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
71/91
GMS ©
Ring BlastingDesign Example
Ring Blasting
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
72/91
GMS ©
Ring BlastingDesign Example – JKSimBlast
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
73/91
GMS ©
Blast Damage
• The prediction of damage to the rock mass is a veryimportant factor to evaluate the quality of the excavationprocess in tunneling, so that it would allow theoptimization of explosive charges utilized in successiveblasting rounds, as well as lowering risks of instability
from rock loosening, less support costs and water inflows.• When an explosive charge detonate inside a borehole
several zones can be distinguished in the surroundingrock: 1) Zone of crushing, 2) Zone of radial cracking, 3)Zone of extension and expansion of fractures and 4)
Elastic Zone, where no cracks are formed.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
74/91
GMS ©
Blast Damage (cont.)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
75/91
GMS ©
Overbreak Extend
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
76/91
GMS ©
Excavation Damaged Zone
• Deviations of that perimeter from their outside and insidelimits are called overbreak and underbreak respectively,with the word backbreak used when overbreak isexcessive.
• The factors influencing the magnitude of EDZ can
conveniently be grouped into two categories, which arerock mass characteristics (geological factors) andexplosive (blasting factors)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
77/91
GMS ©
Measuring EDZ
There are currently three methods of actually measuringexcavation profiles:
• surveying techniques,
• laser based, and
• photographic light sectioning method (LSM).
The principle of the method is to project a radial light to theperimeter of the underground opening so that light raysintersect the perimeter contour of the cavity. The image of thisperimeter is then saved in digitized form to allow furthercomputerized analysis.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
78/91
Measuring EDZ
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
79/91
GMS ©
Measuring EDZusing PPF and Q
PPF = (Pe.Ee)/Vrp
PPF : Perimeter Powder Factor (PPF)
Pe: Weight of explosive charges used in theperimeter blast holes (kg)
Ee: Unit explosive energy (kcal/kg)
Vrp: Excavated volume of annulus (m3)
M i EDZ
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
80/91
GMS ©
Measuring EDZ
EDZo : Damage for Overbreak (index)
EDZu : Damage for Underbreak (index)
a, b, c, a´, b´, c´ are coefficients whose values are obtained bymeans of multiple regression statistics correlating Rock MassQuality Q and Perimeter Powder Factor (PPF) with observedOverbreak and Underbreak.
These predictive equations are site specific, but can readily becalibrated to suit other projects, where the rock and blastingconditions differ from the present case.
EDZo = (-a + b.PPF – c.log Q)/100
EDZu = (a´– b´.PPF + c´.log Q)/100
Polynomial 2D
Model First
Order
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
81/91
GMS ©
Polynomial 2D Model, First order
i2i1oi yb xbb z ˆ
ni
1i
i2
ni
1i
i1o
ni
1i
i yb xbnb z
ni
1i
ii2
ni
1i
2i1
ni
1i
io
ni
1i
ii y xb xb xb z x
ni
1i
2i2
ni
1i
ii1
ni
1i
io
ni
1i
ii yb y xb yb z y
yz
z x
z
b
b
b
y y x y
y x x x
y xn
2
1
o
2
2
Measuring EDZ
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
82/91
GMS ©
Measuring EDZusing PPV
PPV = k (R/W1/3)-n
PPV : Peak Particle Velocity (mm/s)
R: Distance (m)
W: Weight explosive per delay (kg)
D C it i i PPV
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
83/91
GMS ©
Damage Criteria using PPV
References PPV (mm/s) Notes
Bauer & Calder (1970) 635 – 2540 Radial cracking/break up rock mass
Langefors & Kuhlstrom (1973) 305 – 610 New cracks/Fall in tunnels
Oriard (1982) 635 Most rock mass damaged
Rustan et. al. (1985) 1000 - 3000 Rock damageMeyer & Dunn (1995) 600 Major damage
Bogdanhoff (1996) 2000 - 2500 Tunnel damaged
Murthy & Dey (2003) 2050 Tunnel damaged (basaltic formation)
Or use tensile strength?t = C PPV
Damage Criteria using PPV in
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
84/91
GMS ©
g gUG Coal Mines
(a) Major damage: fall of rock/coal blocks from roof and/or pillars.(b) Minor damage: detachment of loosened chips from roof and/or pillars.(c) No damage: no visual damage.
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
85/91
GMS ©
FOR YOUR REFERENCES ….
Supplement
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
86/91
GMS ©
Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
87/91
GMS ©
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
88/91
GMS ©
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
89/91
GMS ©
Bienia ski (1989)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
90/91
GMS ©
Bieniawski (1989)
8/18/2019 6-2014 Rancangan Peledakan Bawah Tanah
91/91
END
Discussion ….