24
6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamics 6. Optical Properties 大学院講義 「半導体物性」

6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6.OpticalProcessesandElectronDynamics

6. Optical Properties大学院講義「半導体物性」

Page 2: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

配置座標上の表現

Page 3: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

6.1 Fundamental Optical Spectra

Reflectance measurement

R =!n −1!n +1

2

ε(ω ) = !n2!n = n + iκ

α = 4πκ / λ0

I = I0 exp(−αd)

Complex refractive index

Complex dielectric functionExtinction index

Absorption coefficientWavelength of light in vacuum

Page 4: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Causality relation (Kramers-Krönig relation)

ε r (ω ) = 1+2πP ω 'ε i (ω ')

ω '2−ω 2 dω '0

ε i (ω ) = − 2ωπP ε r (ω ')

ω '2−ω 2 dω '0

H.R. Philipp and H. Ehrenreich, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, 3, 93 (1967)

Page 5: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Optical transition

H = H0 +emcA ⋅p

Electron-radiation interaction

HeRHeR = −er ⋅E

Electric dipole approximation

long-wavelength limit

kn = ukn (r)exp[ik ⋅r]

W = 2π!

c HeR v2δ Ec(kc )− Ev(kv )− !ω( )

q∑

Transition rate

Pcv = c e ⋅p v = ukc(r)*(e ⋅p)ukv(r)dr∫

= 2π!

emω

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟2

Pcv2δ Ec(kc )− Ev(kv )− !ω( )

q∑

kc = kv vertical transition

dipole approximation

= q ⋅(∇kukc(r)*)(e ⋅p)ukv(r)dr∫ quadrupole approximation

Joint density of states

J(Ecv ) =14π 3

dSk∇kEcv

Page 6: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Imaginary part of dielectric constant near Van Hove singularities

J(E)∝ E − E0( )1/2E(k) = E(0)+ a1k1

2 + a2k22 + a3k3

2

Page 7: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Comparison between theory and experiment

M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Semiconductors, (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

Theory

M. Cardona, L. F. Lastras-Martinez, and E. E. Aspues, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3970 (1999)

Experiment

Page 8: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Theory

C. W. Higginbotham, PhD Thesis, Brown University (1999)

Experiment

Page 9: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Direct transition

M. Cardona, in Solid State Physics, Nuclear Physics and Particle Physics, ed by I. Saavedra (Benjamin, New York, 1968), pp. 737-816

Page 10: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Indirect-transition

G. G. MacFarlane and V. Roberts, Phys. Rev. 97, 1714 (1955); 98, 1865 (1955)

!ω = Ecv ± Ep

kc − kv = ∓Q

W = 2π!

f Hep i i HeR 0Ec − !ωi

∑2

δ Ec(kc )− Ev(kv )− !ω ∓ Ep( )kc ,kv∑

Page 11: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6.2 Absorption Edge Spectra6. Optical Properties

Page 12: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

Absorption-emission processes 6. Optical Properties

Absorption/emission spectra of very pure GaAs

Absorption spectrum of rubyin the infrared, visible, and ultraviolet

G. F. Imbush, in Luminescence Spectroscopy, edited by M. D. Lumb (Academic, New York, 1978). D. D. Sell, Phys. Rev. B 6, 3750 (1972); 7, 4568 (1972)

Luminescence from impurities Luminescence from host crystals

e-h recombination

Page 13: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Ψ(r,Q) =ψ r (r,Q)χn (Q) Born-Oppenheimer product

F(ω ) = i P f 2

Condon approximation

Franck-Condon approximation

i P f = kn P lm

= k P l n m

= Pkl (Q)χn (Q)χm (Q −Q0 )

electronic partphonon part

F(ω ) = Pkl2 χn χm

2

Page 14: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

6.3 Electron-lattice interactions

Page 15: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

Stokes shift6. Optical Properties

G. F. Imbusch, in Luminescence Spectroscopy, edited by M. D. Lumb (Academic, 1978)

Electron-Phonon interaction

Page 16: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

Absorption-emission processes 6. Optical Properties

Q

E

e

g

|0> → |n>

phonon mediated transition

Page 17: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical PropertiesAbsorption coefficient

α (ω )dω = nε4πN!c

Pmni 2

ωmn ρn − ρm( )ω<ωnm<ω+dω∑

F(ω ) Shape function

Pmni = ϕm Pi ϕn

Electron-phonon interaction

l,n Pi m,n ' = dQ∫ χ ln* (Q)χmn ' (Q) drϕl

*(r,Q)Pi∫ ϕm (r,Q)

F(ω ) = l,nµl Pi m,nν

m 2ρl ,nµ

l δ !ω − Em,ν + El ,µ( )mν∑

lµ∑

Pl→ni (Q)

T → 0 El ,m =U0 +Um (Q)

χmn'* (Q)χmn ' (Q ')

n '∑ = δ (Q −Q ')

Fl→m (ω ) = ρln dQ Pmni (Q)

2χ ln (Q)

2δ !ω −U0 −Um (Q)+ El ,n( )∫n∑

Frank-Condon’s principle

completeness

T → high Fl→m (ω ) = dQ Pmni (Q)

2Sl (Q)δ !ω −U0 −Um (Q)+Ul (Q)( )∫

Sl (Q) = ρln χ ln (Q)2

n∑

→exp −Ul (Q) / kT( )dQexp −Ul (Q) / kT( )∫

Page 18: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

Line shape

= exp −S( ) m!n!

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ S

n−m Lmn−m S( )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦

2

S = A2

2

εam = m + 12

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ !ω a

εbn = n + 12

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟ !ωb + Eab −

12A2!ω

At T = 0 K

At high T

Only m=0 is allowed.

p = n–m

peaked at n ≃ S

Fnm = χbn | χam2

Fn0 =Sn

n!e−S

L0n S( ) = 1

En = (Eab − !ω )+ n!ω = E0 + n!ω

Fp = exp px − S coth x( ) I p Scseh(x)( )x = !ω

2kT

Q

E

e

g

Q

E

a

b

Eaba

(a) 12Mω 2Q2

(b) (a)+ Eab − A!ωMω!

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟1/2

Q

Page 19: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6.4 Special Topics: DX center6. Optical Properties

Page 20: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

Large-Lattice-Relaxation modelD. V. Lang and R. A. Logan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59 635 (1977)

6. Optical Properties

Page 21: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

D. V. Lang, et al., Phys. Rev. B 19, 1015 (1979)

Page 22: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties

QConfiguration coordinate

Etot

Eopt

EeEcapE0

DX-

d0 + e

(a) (b)

QConfiguration coordinate

Etot

Eopt

EeEcap

E0

DX-d0 + e

Ga

As Si

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

d 0 DX -

Ga

AsSi

Ga

AsS

d 0

Ga

AsS

DX -

D. J. Chadi and K. J. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 39, 10063 (1989)

Page 23: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

4. Deep levels

N. Chand, et al., Phys. Rev. B 30, 4481 (1984)H. P. Hjalmarson, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 810 (1980)

Page 24: 6. Optical Processes and Electron Dynamicskoun/Lecs/Semicond/...6. Optical Properties Comparison between theory and experiment M. L. Cohen and J. R. Chelikowsky, Electronic Structure

6. Optical Properties