8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

1/609

EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

2/609

FW: DV09-01168 issues

From: Zach Coughlin ([email protected])

Sent: Thu 8/22/13 12:50 PM

To: [email protected] ([email protected])

29 attachments

5 28 09 email from [email protected] 0204 01168

54844 - Copy.pdf (31.3 KB) , 6 28 11 0204 01955 RE Rejection of

email to 2JDC whether Elliott CAAW Assignement in 01955 was truly

random.pdf (148.6 KB) , 5 20 09 0204 01168 email from

cindy.fladager to [email protected] dv08-01168

email.pdf (14.6 KB) , 5 20 09 0204 ocr 0434 0435 62337 Reply to

Opposition 28 pages DV08-01168-1083206 (Reply...).pdf (853.7 KB)

, 5 21 09 0204 01168 2JDC L Gardner's Order Denying Request for

Reconsideration.pdf (353.6 KB) , Judges and Court Clerks Violate the

Law when Your Court Filings are Denied or Disappear.pdf (797.2

KB) , 1 29 2012 letter to Clerk of Court Orduna Hastings regarding

Eflex rejections with attachments 41 pages total.pdf (957.8 KB) , 6 19

09 0204 62337 ocrd 01955 01168 FOFCOLDOD Final Order or

Decree of Divorce in Joshi 01168 overrides FHE3 4 13 09 Ord.pdf

(166.4 KB) , 11 14 12 0204 62337 Transcript Order Delivery for170008.zip (1586.5 KB) , 11 14 12 0204 Transcript of Hearing with

Index 170008ch-Full.pdf (697.8 KB) , 1 15 10 Isakson D14 L.

Gardner and Springgate WLS Client DV09-00163 0204 01168 01955

54844 reduced.pdf (1123.5 KB) , DV09-00163 - GASPAR ISAKSON

VS NANETTE ISAKSON (D14) 0204 DOCKET SPRINGGATE BK

APPROACH LOOKIN' SOLID 01168.pdf (132.1 KB) , 5 1 09 email

and attached WLS Elcano letter citing L. Gardner Order as sole reason

for firing 60302.pdf (75.5 KB) , 5 7 09 0204 01955 WLS Elcanotermination letter zachcoughlin040709.pdf (23.2 KB) , 4 20 09 0204

01955 54844 Coughlin's email Employment Complaint of Zach

Coughlin, Esq to [email protected] Breckenridge.pdf

(66.6 KB) , 4 19 09 personal and confidential email to Elcano 752pm

60302 0435.pdf (29.9 KB) , 4 24 09 email from Breckenridge 0204

01955 WLS needs attach.htm (9.5 KB) , 4 20 09 0204 01168 WLS

Elcano's letter to Coughlin placing on administrative leave serious

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

3/609

allegation professional misconduct 0204.pdf (426.2 KB) , 5 26 09

0204 01168 email from 2JDC Fladager responding to Coughlin's

inquiry of 5 24 09 re 5 20 09 filing not filed prior to 5 21 09 Order.pdf

(221.6 KB) , 5 26 09 email from Springgate 0204 54844 0204 re wdcr

9 proposed final decree he says he did his discovery in the 16.1.htm

(11.7 KB) , 10 28 09 0204 62337 54844 20 page Petition for Writ of

Mandamus Coughlin v 2JDC, Judge Linda Gardner sanction WLS firesCoughlin 26405 her brother RMC 26800 60302 01955.pdf (20.7 KB) ,

5 28 09 email to 2JDC RE DV08-01168 0204.pdf (207.7 KB) , 5 28

09 0204 62337 01168 Coughlin email to WLS Ashley fw wdcr 9

Proposed detailing alimony BK issues.pdf (118.7 KB) , 5 14 09 0204

62337 01168 WDCR 23 violating WLS

[email protected] 0204 01955 01168.pdf (188.5

KB) , 5 21 09 Springgate's Prop FOFCOLDOD 0204 01168 01955

email Springgate w 5 21 12 Req Sub Prop Ord spare sanct compare 4

10 09 Ord.pdf (128.0 KB) , 5 24 09 email to Springgate 0204 01168

WDCR 9 Proposed Final Decree, RE discovery requests.pdf (15.4

KB) , 5 27 09 DV08-01168_1084475 WLS's Ashley's Mtn to Correct

Proposed Decree 0204 0435 60302 62337 .pdf (98.6 KB) , 6 18 12

26405 transcript 4 per page 0204 bw.pdf (1194.8 KB) , 11 7 12 0204

62337 bates 3018 to 3043 2JDC Judge Linda Gardner NG12-0435

grievance fileocrd.pdf (2.4 MB)

Dear Mr. Hill,

I am not sure it is required, but to avoid any appearance of ex partecommunications, I am copying you on this.

Sincerely,

Zachary Barker Coughlin 1471 E. 9th St. Reno, NV 89512 Tel and Fax: 949 6677402 [email protected]

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]

Subject: DV09-01168 issues
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

4/609

Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:47:50 -0700

Ms. Fladager,

I have a couple of questions.

I am writing to complain about the fact that the WCDA DDA Young has had greater access to the ROA in

several cases, including CR13-0614 than I, a non efiler, have been accorded. Whereas Young has access toa digital copy of the over 500 page ROA in CR13-0614 Coughlin has been refused a digital copy thereof,

and, despite the fact that numerous counter clerks have indicated to Coughlin that all criminal

defendants are entitled to one free copy of every filing in their cases, Michelle Purdy and Julie Wise have

order clerks not to allow Coughlin such a free copy of fi lings in his cases, including the ROA (or "Justice

Court Appeal") in CR13-0614.

As to DV08-01168, and the removal of Coughlin from the list of those afforded eFlex access during a very

exigent time, how does such comport with WDCR 23:

WDCR Rule23.Appearances; substitutions; withdrawal or change of attor neys....

2.Counsel in any case may be changed:

(a)When a new attorney is to be subs tituted in place of the attorney withdrawing, by the written cons ent of bothattorneys and the client, all of which shall be filed with the court and served upon all parties or their attorneys who haveappeared in the action; or

(b)By order of the court, upon motion and not ice as provided in these rules, when no attorney has been retained toreplace the attorney withdrawing;

(1)If such motion is made by the attorney, counsel shall include in an affidavit the address, or last knownaddress, at which the client may be served with notice of further proceedings taken in the case in the event the applicationfor withdrawal is granted, and counsel shall serve a copy of such motion and supporting papers upon the client and all

other parties to the action or their attorneys; or

(2)If such motion is made by the client, the client shall state therein the address at which the client may be servedwith notice of all further proceedings in the case in the event the application is granted, and shall serve a copy of theapplication upon the attorney and all other parties to the action or their attorneys.

3.Any form of order permitting withdrawal of an attorney submitted to the court for signature shall contain theaddress at which the party is to be served with notice of all further proceedings.

4.Except for good cause shown, no application for withdrawal or substitution shall be granted if a delay of the trialor of the hearing of any other matter in the case would result. Discharge of an attorney may not be grounds to delay a trialor other hearing.

5.A corporation may not appear in proper person.

Asst . Clerk of Court Wise and Michelle Purdy (and, formerly Appeals Clerk Lori Matheus) take an incredibly strict (and,inventive, even) approach to technical rules when it comes to Coughlin, yet, the WCDA's Officer and Inside Baseballpower players like Was hoe Legal Services Elcano, get a pas s, some might say. Why is WLS able to have Coughlin"substituted out" without the "s ignature of both attorneys" without any motion, etc.?

Further, problematic is the fact that the eflex number accorded to Coughlin's 5/20/09 Reply in that Joshi matter is

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

5/609

numerically subsequent to the Order denying the Motion. And, there does not seem to be a Request to Submit sufficientto have Coughlin's 4/30/09 Motion and Springgate's 5/12/09 Opposition put to Judge L. Gardner, and certainly not soonenough for her to craft a 7 page Order. Additionally, Coughlin's 5/20/09 Opposition (which was filed using the dropboxrequired by WDCR 10 that the 2JDC continues to fail to provide in what some might say is an impermissible arm twistingattempt to make litigants s ign up for eFlex) has two file stamps on it, one crossed out.

Additionally, can you please indicate why you sent Coughlin an email of 6/28/09 requesting that he resubmit hisComplaint against Washoe Legal Services and indicate whether there was some impermissible attempt to game the randomassignment of cases sufficient to result in 2JDC Judge Elliott being assigned CV11-01955 in Coughlin's lawsuit against

CAAW and WLS where Judge Elliott sat on CAAW's Executive Board, and never disclosed such to Coughlin and failedto recuse himself? Certainly, thes e peculiarities in DV08-01168 and the ensu ing wrongful termination litigat ions in CV11-01896 and CV11-01955 are noteworthy given the spate of Eflex rejections of Coughlin' filing in the first quarter of 2012 (19of 23 filings rejected at one point, many of which were of an exigent nature and submitted in the two Coughlin v. WLSwrongful termination suits) combined with the Washoe County Sheriff's Office failure to timely serve the defendants inCV11-01896 despite Coughlin having an IFP on file, where 60302 (and 60317) reveal the extent to which those cases werelargely gutted due to such failure to timely serve the defendants where Coughlin's Motions for Extension of Time ToServe (which both took approximately five attempts to get Appeal Clerk Lori Matheus to accept for filing) were denied, toCoughlin's extreme prejudice (no matter whether the Order indicated such dismiss als were "without prejudice" where therunning of the 90 days from "receipt of EEOC right to sue letter" occurred in the interim and arguably, effectivelyforeclosed Coughlin's refiling such Complaints .

Interestingly, that same "receipt" concept became exceedingly relevant incident to the Washoe County Sheriff's Office

numerous burglaries of Coughlin's former home law offices and rentals (see Rev2011-001708, Rev2012-000374, Rev2012-001048, RCR2012-067980, RMC 12 CR 12420, etc) given the "within 24 hours of receipt of the order" language in NRS40.253(5)(a) with respect to how lockouts are to be carried out in the context of a summary removal order within a summaryeviction case.

Perhaps not so surprisingly, 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's brother RMC Judge W. Gardner, did not find Coughlin's arguments

compelling in the criminal trespass case against Coughlin (see 61901 SCR 111(4) Petition in N. S. Ct) incident to opposing

counsel in CV11-03628 burglarizing Coughlin former home law office with the WCSO in tow on 11/1/11, and again, but with

the RPD along for the fun, on 11/13/11. Russ ell v. Kalian, 414 A.2D 462. Iorio v City of New York, 96 Misc.2D 955. Mayes

v. UVI.

Speaking of NCJC Canon 2, Rule 2.15 and reporting misconduct (there by RMC Judge W. Gardner) to an "appropriateauthority", 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's apparent failure to contact the SBN or otherwise take "appropriate action" (well,unless one counts poisoning the well of RMC Judges via impermissible extra judicial communications against Coughlin in11 CR 22176 (see 60838), 11 CR 26405, 11 TR 26800 (see 62337), 12 CR 00696, 12 CR 12420 as taking "appropriate action", towhatever extent passing the 4/13/09 Order After Trial (FHE3 at Coughlin's 11/14/12 formal disciplinary hearing) to her ownbrother (an "appropriate authority"?)

Further, a really detailed review of the Certificates of Mailing in all filings in DV08-01168 subsequent to Coughlin's removalfrom the list of those allowed to access it on eFlex reveals some rather, uh, interesting, things.

Additionally, the docket entry in FV09-00886 Uribe v. Valdez, indicating Washoe Legal Services Board President K.Breckenridge ordered, on 4/10/09 the audio recording of a 3/12/09 TPO hearing wherein Coughlin represented a malevictim of domestic violence (where Coughlin complained to Elcano that WLS's Sternlicht told a room full of individualsseeking services, which included two males, that "males cannot be victims of domestic violence"), which is particularlyinteresting timing cons idering WLS's Exec. Director Elcano's indications in his letters to Coughlin on 5/1/09 and 5/7/09 asto exactly why (with limiting language) Coughlin was suspended and then fired on 5/14/09. Interestingly, despite 2JDCJudge L. Gardner's 6/19/09 Order vitiating Elcano's rationale for firing Coughlin where such order vacating the attorney feesanction that Springgate was able to garner in invoking NRS 7.085 in his closing argument (the incorporation of NRCP 1therein making problematic Springgate's failure to serve any filing ready sanctions motion, much less allow the passing ofthe required 21 day safe harbor). Of course, Hill's and Baker's burglary entails an RPC 8.3 burden as well.

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

6/609

However, Elcano s till showed up to Coughlin's 11/14/12 formal disciplinary hearing (where the SBN violated SCR 105(2)(c)in only constructively noticing Coughlin that Elcano was to be a witnes s the day before the hearing, rather than providingthe required "30 days written notice) and testified as though the 4/13/09 Order After Trial had not been superseded by the6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce.

Interestingly, another case involving Coughlin, Springgate, and 2JDC Judge L. Gardner illustrates one of the very reasonswhy entering into the proposed settlement agreement that Springgate accused Coughlin of being "vexatious" for failing tocoerce his client into accepting. Isakson, DV09-00163.

Somehow between Springgate's 5/21/09 Proposed Decree and Request for Submission thereof (in which Springgate, whomfailed to serve such on Coughlin indicates that WLS saw no problems with such 5/21/09 Proposed Decree, which includesan attorney's fee sanction and failed to award Mrs. Joshi alimony (whether Coughlin is not considered a "party" underWDCR 9 does not stop the SBN from attempting to apply offensive collateral estoppel to a vacated 4/13/09 Order AfterTrial, sufficient to "prove" by "clear and convincing evidence" that Coughlin violated a multitude of Rules of Profess ionalConduct incident to successfully obtaining alimony for Mrs. Joshi.

I appreciate your response to these matters.

Sincerely,

Zach Coughlin

--Forwarded Message Attachment--

Close Print

WLS

From:Kathy Breckenridge ([email protected]) You moved this message to its current

location.

Sent: Fri 4/24/09 9:27 AM


1 attachment

Coughlin ltr Apr23, 09.pdf (4.4 KB)

--

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

7/609

Kathleen T. Breckenridge, Esq.Kathleen T. Breckenridge, Ltd.462 Court StreetReno, NV 89501(775) 786-5055(775) 786-8449 (fax)This email is confidential and may be privileged and may beprivileged attorney-client communication intended only for theperson(s) named in this email. Examination, use, copying ordissemination of these materials by person(s) other than the intendedrecipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you received thiscommunication in error, please contact Kathleen T. Breckenridge,Ltd., by telephone and return the original message to such firm bymail. We will gladly reimburse all telephone and postage expenses.


Close Print

Re: WDCR 9 Proposed Final Decree, RE: discovery requests

From:John Springgate ([email protected]) You moved this message to its current location.

Sent: Tue 5/26/09 5:14 PM


1 attachment

20090526171158758.pdf (345.0 KB)

1. The proposed order was filed May 21. I have attached a copy viapdf. I kept it very sparse on the sanctions.

2. The bankruptcy concerns are not your issue, she is not yourclient.

3. I did my discovery in the 16.1.

/s/ John

Zach Coughlin wrote:> Hi Jon,> Have you submitted a Final Decree or Findings of Fact yet? Will you> be providing me a copy. Apparently, I am not able to access efilefor> this case, so I assume that means you could not serve me such a> document via efile. Do you intend to assert that I am not entitled> to a copy of the proposed order, pursuant to WDCR 9? If I am, Ihave> 5 days to object to it, etc...I know we previously discussedlanguage

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

8/609

> for bankruptcy concerns in our settlement discussion, but I feel itis> important for the final order to specify what is for what so thatany> 523-a-15 or 523-a-5 issues do not become problematic; granted sheis> WLS's client...However, to the extent that the Final Decree spellsout> the sanctions, I believe I am entitled to 5 days to review any> proposed Final Decree prior to your submitting it. Please let meknow> what you intend to do. Hopefully you received my Reply to your> Opposition. Can you respond to my earlier question, see below,> regarding whether you ever sent any discovery requests to Ms.Joshi?> Sincerely,> Zach Coughlin>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> From: [email protected]> To: [email protected]> Subject: discovery requests> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:43:17 -0700>> Hi John,> Do you have any record of sending any discovery requests to Bharti> Joshi? If so, could you indicate what they were and when andprovide> a copy?> Sincerely,

> Zach Coughlin, Esq.>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail. See how.> > -------------------------------------------------------------------

-----> Windows Live: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.>


Close Print
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

9/609

WLS

From:Kathy Breckenridge ([email protected]) You moved this message to its current

location.

Sent: Fri 4/24/09 9:27 AM


1 attachment

Coughlin ltr Apr23, 09.pdf (4.4 KB)

--Kathleen T. Breckenridge, Esq.Kathleen T. Breckenridge, Ltd.462 Court StreetReno, NV 89501(775) 786-5055(775) 786-8449 (fax)This email is confidential and may be privileged and may be

privileged attorney-client communication intended only for theperson(s) named in this email. Examination, use, copying ordissemination of these materials by person(s) other than the intendedrecipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you received thiscommunication in error, please contact Kathleen T. Breckenridge,Ltd., by telephone and return the original message to such firm bymail. We will gladly reimburse all telephone and postage expenses.


Close Print

Re: WDCR 9 Proposed Final Decree, RE: discovery requests

From:John Springgate ([email protected]) You moved this message to its current location.

Sent: Tue 5/26/09 5:14 PM


1 attachment

20090526171158758.pdf (345.0 KB)

1. The proposed order was filed May 21. I have attached a copy viapdf. I kept it very sparse on the sanctions.

2. The bankruptcy concerns are not your issue, she is not yourclient.

3. I did my discovery in the 16.1.

/s/ John

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

10/609

Zach Coughlin wrote:> Hi Jon,> Have you submitted a Final Decree or Findings of Fact yet? Will you> be providing me a copy. Apparently, I am not able to access efilefor> this case, so I assume that means you could not serve me such a> document via efile. Do you intend to assert that I am not entitled> to a copy of the proposed order, pursuant to WDCR 9? If I am, Ihave> 5 days to object to it, etc...I know we previously discussedlanguage> for bankruptcy concerns in our settlement discussion, but I feel itis> important for the final order to specify what is for what so thatany> 523-a-15 or 523-a-5 issues do not become problematic; granted sheis> WLS's client...However, to the extent that the Final Decree spellsout

> the sanctions, I believe I am entitled to 5 days to review any> proposed Final Decree prior to your submitting it. Please let meknow> what you intend to do. Hopefully you received my Reply to your> Opposition. Can you respond to my earlier question, see below,> regarding whether you ever sent any discovery requests to Ms.Joshi?> Sincerely,> Zach Coughlin>> -------------------------------------------------------------------

-----> From: [email protected]> To: [email protected]> Subject: discovery requests> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:43:17 -0700>> Hi John,> Do you have any record of sending any discovery requests to Bharti> Joshi? If so, could you indicate what they were and when andprovide> a copy?

> Sincerely,> Zach Coughlin, Esq.>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail. See how.>
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

11/609

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> Windows Live: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.>
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

12/609

ClPrint

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

From: Zach Coughlin([email protected])Sent: Sun 4/19/09 7:52 PM

To: Paul Elcano ([email protected]); [email protected]

THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED FOR PAUL ELCANO ONLY, PLEASE DO NOT READ UNLESS YOU ARE THE INTENDED

RECIPIENT.

Paul Elcano, Executive Director

Washoe Legal Services

299 S. Arlington Ave.

Reno, NV 89501

April 15th, 2009

Dear Paul,

wish to make another formal complaint alleging a hostile work environment that includes harassment, sexualharassment, workplace bullying, discrimination and other prohibited conduct directed towards due to my race, gender,eligion, national origin, political affiliation, sexual orientation, and age.

have been harassed, sexually harassed, and discriminated against by employees of Washoe Legal Services on manyoccasions. This is ongoing. I have informed you and others at our workplace of this harassment many times. Some, butnot all, of the prohibited behavior directed towards me includes inappropriate sexually charged comments, raciallycharged comments, gender discrimination, screaming, the use of disparaging and foul language, bullying, andntimidation. Much of this conduct has focused on my gender, sexual orientation, national origin, political affiliation or

viewpoint, race and other immutable characteristics. This conduct has continued to occur and is presently ongoing. MarcAshley, Karen Sabo, and John Sasser were definitely made aware of this by me in one of our sit down meetings and Informed them of my wish to file a formal complaint at that time, though I do not believe my request was followed up on.

I recently filed a formal complaint approximately two months ago but have yet to hear back from anyone with WashoeLegal Services regarding that complaint.

am in no way going to detail every single inappropriate or prohibited act by a Washoe Legal Services employee directed

at me in this communication. It is my firm desire that we all just get along, serve our clients well, and make efficient useof the grants bestowed upon us, and I would hate to see anyone lose their job without a real opportunity to address thesessues. This inappropriate conduct has included a variety of activities, not all of which I will be able to fully detail in this

complaint but will be able to provide details at an appropriate time.

would like a copy of this and my other complaints placed in my employment file. I request that the formal complaintand grievance process begin soon.

Sincerely,

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

13/609

Zach Coughlin, Esq.

Rediscover Hotmail: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. Check it out.

000
http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Storage2_042009http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Storage2_042009

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

14/609

Paul Elcano,Execuve Director

Marc Ashley,Esq.

Lay Belasco Esq

Sarah Class,Esq.

Zach Coughin,Esq

Ein Cng Esq

April 20,2009

Zach Coughlin931 Forest StreetReno NV 89509

Dear Zach

Melissa anaraca,Esq

Karen er,Esq

aren Sa 0,Esq

Caryn St cht,Esq

Jon Sasse ,Esq

WaoeLeglServices

Due to serious allegations of profe sional misconduct you have been ace onadmiistrative leave with pay efec ive immediately.

incerly

Paul anoExeci DirectoWasho Legal Ss

299 South Arlingon Ave Reno,Nevada 89501 Fa: 775.34.5

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

15/609

ClPrint

employment complaint of Zach Coughlin, Esq.

From: Zach Coughlin([email protected])Sent: Mon 4/20/09 4:30 PM

To: [email protected] attachmentsLetter to Board President Breckenridge.doc (39.0 KB) , Complaint for Washoe Legal ServicesBoard.doc (26.0 KB)

NB: attachments contain the same as that which is pasted below:

Kathleen T. Breckenridge, Esq.

Board President, Washoe Legal Services

Kathleen T. Breckenridge Ltd.

462 Court Street

Reno, NV 89501

April 20th, 2009

Dear Kathleen,

Normally I would not write to you at this juncture in the process, however, you apparently are already aware ofome situation now existing between Washoe Legal Services and myself. I do not know whether you are awarehat I had already filed complaints and or grievances with Washoe Legal Services and am awaiting a response.

This communication is intended to make sure that you are aware of this.

am concerned for my clients and wish to have access to my office and files so that I may comply with the Rulesof Professional Responsibility. Further, one case, the Bharti Joshi matter contains a ruling that orders me to

personally pay attorneys fees to the opposing party. Reconsideration of this Order after Trial must be soughtmmediately and I would like some indication from Washoe Legal Services as to whether I am allowed to seekuch reconsideration. I intend to seek to have this order reconsidered and would like some direction as to whether

you, the Board, or Washoe Legal Services intends to continue to, in some way, prevent me from having a chanceo have my personal liability in that case reconsidered in addition to preserving the clients avenues foreconsideration.

Paul Elcano, Executive Director of Washoe Legal Services, has directed me to have no involvement in any of mycases, and to refrain from entering the building at 299 S. Arlington Avenue regardless of any duty I may have

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

16/609

under the Rules of Professional Responsibility or otherwise. He indicates this is the Boards directive as well.He further indicates that he and the Board have decided that I will not be allowed to retrieve anything from myoffice until further notice, including my personal belongings. I would like some indication, in writing, that that ishe case, as I feel I have a responsibility to my clients to protect their interests to the fullest extent possible andhat it is impossible to do so while obeying these directives.

still have yet to be told what it is I am being accused of, or by whom, and I have not been interviewed or

questioned in that regard prior to implementation of the Boards apparent decision to suspend me. Further, theemployment complaints and grievances (and there is more than one) that I filed prior to any such suspension haveyet to be responded to in any way that I am aware of. Whether any retaliation for my complaints is occurring iscertainly up for debate.

I request that I am given proper written notice of what is alleged against me and by whom, that I be in allappropriate ways included in this process, and that I am allowed to retrieve my personal belongings and take theappropriate steps to assure the protection of my clients interests.

With regard to being ordered to personally pay attorneys fees in the Joshi divorce matter, I feel I have quite atrong argument for overturning that Order. Basically, the award of attorneys fees relates to my refusal to accept

a settlement offer whereby my client would agree to taking $1.00 of alimony for five years in exchange for theopposing party agreeing to be responsible for about $30,000 of consumer debt. This consumer debt was largelyncurred on the opposing partys credit cards, to which my client was not a co-signer or authorized user and was

never allowed to examine any sort of itemized statement of the charges incurred (despite my written requests toopposing counsel and indication that allowing her to do so would further settlement negotiations). While thesecredit card debts were presumptively community property and my client could have her share of the communityproperty (for which there was none, they are paycheck to paycheck people who dont own a house) used to satisfyhe community credit card debt, she faced no personal liability. This was a 21 year marriage with a $12,000 yearly

ncome disparity favoring the opposing party. My client had been the primary caregiver to their now 20 year oldchildren.

argued against accepting such a settlement (though I certainly informed my client that the decision to go to trialwas largely hers). I anticipated the trial would result in an alimony award to my client of roughly $500 per monthpotentially for over 10 years. Should my client have been ordered to pay half the community credit card debt (forwhich her personal property probably could not be used to satisfy as she was not a cosigner on the account), anyubsequent failure on her part to do so could arguably not be used as a proper basis to set off any alimony awardeceived.

t seems I was ordered to personally pay attorneys fees for failing to accept the settlement and pursuing anargument that the court did not feel was warranted by existing law. However, as detailed below, there does appear

o be a good deal of existing law supporting the position we took in rejecting the settlement offer. I in no wayold my client to disobey any order of the court. Like many domestic violence cases, the settlement offered

exerted a good deal of inappropriate power and control (a la the Duluth model) over my client and her

rights and I objected to that and am proud for having done so in the face of much arm twisting.

The court in each of the following cases determined that an offset against an arrearage of alimony for payments tovarious third parties on behalf of a former spouse, including tuition and sums spent in satisfaction of a bank loanor credit card charges, would not be permitted.

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

17/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

18/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

19/609

altruistic contributions you make to our community in serving as the Board President for Washoe Legal Services.

Sincerely,

Zach Coughlin, Esq.

From: [email protected]: [email protected];Subject: PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIALDate: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:52:41 -0700

Paul Elcano, Executive Director

Washoe Legal Services

299 S. Arlington Ave.

Reno, NV 89501

April 15th, 2009

Dear Paul,

wish to make another formal complaint alleging a hostile work environment that includes harassment, sexualharassment, workplace bullying, discrimination and other prohibited conduct directed towards due to my race,gender, religion, national origin, political affiliation, sexual orientation, and age.

have been harassed, sexually harassed, and discriminated against by employees of Washoe Legal Services onmany occasions. This is ongoing. I have informed you and others at our workplace of this harassment manyimes. Some, but not all, of the prohibited behavior directed towards me includes inappropriate sexually charged

comments, racially charged comments, gender discrimination, screaming, the use of disparaging and foul languagebullying, and intimidation. Much of this conduct has focused on my gender, sexual orientation, national origin,political affiliation or viewpoint, race and other immutable characteristics. This conduct has continued to occurand is presently ongoing. Marc Ashley, Karen Sabo, and John Sasser were definitely made aware of this by me inone of our sit down meetings and I informed them of my wish to file a formal complaint at that time, though I donot believe my request was followed up on. I recently filed a formal complaint approximately two months agobut have yet to hear back from anyone with Washoe Legal Services regarding that complaint.

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

20/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

21/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

22/609

Print Cl

WLSFrom: Paul Elcano([email protected]) You moved this message to its current

location.

Sent: Fri 5/01/09 8:52 AMTo: [email protected]: Kathy Breckenridge ([email protected])

1 attachmentltrCoughlin2ndDraft.doc (30.5 KB)

Letter attached.

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

23/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

24/609

8. Counseling for difficulties in office interaction had already been scheduledwhen I received Judge Gardners order. You did not appear for the mandatorymeeting at which I announced this counseling;

9. We have received a copy of a 50 page motion for reconsideration you filed inthe Joshi matter. I will review this in its entirety. If there is any other writtenmaterial you want me to review in determining whether or not youremployment should continue with WLS you must provide it to me by 5:00 pmMonday, May 4

th. I will be happy to pick up any such material at a reasonable

time and place if you are not comfortable emailing it to me.

Based on the forgoing I will be taking the following action:

1. I will review the tape in the Joshi matter, your fifty page motion forreconsideration and any other written material you provide to me. If your conduct

was as represented by Judge Gardner you will be terminated. This terminationwill be based exclusively on the manner in which you conducted this hearing, andwill not be related to any ultimate outcome regarding the sanctions order. WLScan not maintain an employment relationship with a lawyer who arguesincessantly, appears unprepared and makes sarcastic and derogatory remarks tothe court, and otherwise conducts his or her case in a rude and disrespectfulmanner. This determination will be made by me by 10:00 am Wednesdaymorning, May 6, 2009.

2. If the hearing tape does not justify Judge Gardners order WLS will require you toparticipate in the previously referred to employee counseling pursuant to thedirectives of our industrial psychologist. This counseling is currently going onwith other employees at WLS. The counselor will determine the extent to whichyou will participate and maintain a case load. You will maintain your employmentstatus, and will receive pay and benefits throughout this course of counseling.

3. If you wish to discuss any resolution of this matter between now and Wednesdaymorning at 10 am I will be available to meet with you at any convenient time andplace, including this weekend. You may bring any person you would like to aresolution discussion. I will come alone unless you request otherwise.

This has been sent to you by email. Please advise me as to the address to which a hardcopy of this transmittal should be delivered.

Sincerely,

Paul Elcano

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

25/609

May 7, 2009

Zach Coughlin945 W. 12th Street

Reno, NV 89509

Dear Mr. Coughlin,

I have reviewed the following:

1.

The Joshi hearing CD2. Your fifty page Motion for Reconsideration before Judge Gardner3. Your seventeen page letter to me4. Each and every one of your emails and attachments to date, including your e-mail of

May 7, 2009 sent at 1:45 am.

5. The Joshi fileIn an attempt to resolve this matter I have tried to schedule a meeting with you. I have

left you voicemails asking you to call me, and I have indicated that I would meet you at any

convenient time and place to discuss resolution. For whatever reason, you have not scheduledsuch a session. In addition, I have attempted through independent means to schedule meetings

with you. This involved discussion with persons I believe to be your mentors prior to and during

your employment here. It is my understanding that they also have been unable to schedule a

meeting with you.

I have reviewed the hearings in detail and have concluded that your conduct in these two

hearings warrants termination. The judges findings that you argued incessantly, made rude andsarcastic remarks, and refused to heed the Courts admonitions were well founded. Your conduct

obstructed the hearing process. You refused to or were unable to follow the simplest instructions

from the Judge. Washoe Legal Services cannot employ an attorney who repeatedly conducts

himself with such lack of civility and professionalism in court.

Your performance in the second hearing was virtually a repeat of the first, even though

the hearings were five days apart. I have therefore concluded that heat of the battle was not a

significant factor in your inappropriate conduct. Judge Gardner was not rude or antagonistic. Sherepeatedly explained how she wanted you to handle matters and you refused to conform your

conduct to her wishes. The hearing CD speaks for itself: so I will not analyze it any further in the

body of this letter.

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

26/609

Your employment termination is effective as of Monday, May 11, 2009 at 5:00 pm. Your

final paycheck will be available Monday, May 11, 2009 at 5:00 pm. It will be made by directdeposit unless you request otherwise. Your medical benefits will terminate in conformity with

this letter, and applicable law. You may schedule a time with me outside of business hours to

pick up your personal effects. Computer contents will be handled as discussed in my previous

email. If you wish to resign from your employment to avoid an involuntary termination on youremployment records, you must meet with me prior to Monday, May 11, 2009 at 5:00 pm to

discuss this issue.

Sincerely,

Paul ElcanoExecutive Director

PE:bwSent by e-mail.Hard copy sent to:945 W. 12th Street,Reno, NV 89509

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

27/609

- l

5

0

5

20

5 RTIJO

CO: 4075Mac Ashey qNad B o 8326WAHO GA ERV29 ou Angon A eneRno 8950lephone: (75) 85-572Fcmie: 775 3245509Atr D/ndC

N T FAMILY DVSON

I 3:

,-.5Simosn

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

N THE SECOND JUDCAL DSTR COUT OF TH STATE OF

NEADA AND FOR THE COTY OF WASHOE

HwrN OSH,

v

PlaintfCudeda

2 BAT! OS

3

4

Defeda/Coua

Cas No D8 8

Dep. No:

NOTCE OF SSTTUTO OF STAFF COSEL

16 BHARTI JOSH DefendanCounterclaimant. in he aovenied mae ndeands ht s

7 is ng epesened by Whoe Leglces and ths, agees

d consents to he susiton o8 MAR AEY EQ as 1a conse o Wah egal ces n e pace d sead o

19 ZCARY COUGHIN, ESQ., wo sno longer mpoyed by Wahoe Legal rvicesas stf

aoey_ do not ws o appea e ot's ode n hs ase wold ke e f decee to e

eeed s soon s posseS ts te ca enoced

2 DATED s day o ay 2009

23

24

26

28

. ,

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

28/609

5

0

5

0

MRC HEY. Q by c cl c f

2 ZCHRY COUHN EQ y c f f/Ccm BHR

OH b m

AAO URSUA O RS 239B.030

u by a c cm c

6 ca y mb f y

7 DAE 1' f My 2009.

8 WHO G R

9

4

16

1718

19

21

23

26

27

28

MRC HEY E

2 000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

29/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

30/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

31/609

N B 6 D 14

>

=. U

$3785

_

_

L::OC=mru:- " 0

Z Coli EsqB o 3 W SReo V 853Poe 775 338 818 Z Cg

= 0 Q_ _m_ :!= >WICOa3

10

13

14

20

2J

4

z -&..

FMLY DIISIO OF SECOD UDCIDISRC COUR OF

S E O VD FO COY OF WSO

si os No.; V ( 0 \ \ 6Pi \P' It

s

B os

Deed

PLY O OOSION

Comes o Coli sq, o le is Rely o Ooso o

oo For Reosideo o e Order fe il is Re o Oosiio is

mde d sed o e ed Memordm of Pois d oiies i

d e ers d ledis o le is io

DED s d o My

Coi Es

Pe

00002

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

32/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

33/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

34/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

35/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

36/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

37/609

5

5

2

J

7

8

9

0

l

4

7

1

20

I

24

2

attrney kew that the actin was with any easnabe bass in aw and cud nt be

suppred by a gdath agument r an exensin mdicatn r reesa existing

aw, hed the cur, in Radein ndustra Fire & Casuay ns. C. ( 19 1 1 Ws 2d 05

35 2d he ct stated a wpnged est deermining an attrneys

respnsibiity in sanctins r cmmencing a is actin rst is the aw eady r an

exensn mdicatin eersa and i nt then secnd was the agument r such

change made in gd aith een thugh nt successu. Frilus acn caims are an

especialy decate area said the curt, since the ingenity, resightedness and cmpetency

the ba shd be encuaged and nt stied In this case, hweer the cur decided

that a secia hearing bere the tria ct n the ssue rsness was n necessary

because the attrney had been paced n ntice t deend his psitin bth in the tia cur

and n apeal he cur armed the award against the aey bseing that thee was

n pssie reasnabe agument r his they

See iiams Capps aier Saes nc (992, Aa App 0 S 2d 12 [a]

ra cu did n satis eqiemens r exercisng its nherent athrity t impse

attrney ees aganst an attney r ad ith cnduct when it rdeed husbands cunsel t

remit ne ha his ees receied t wes cunse, where tra crt did nt pemt

husbands cnse pesent witnesses r the eidence in his deense tia ct did nt

make an exress nding bad aith r ndngs jsting the ee rdeed and rder did

n sw hw e ees awarded drecy reaed t e ees nrred as a res he aeged

bad aith cnduc y husband's cunsel Fnl in 92 S 2d 2 (Fa Dist Ct p

th Dis. 2005, eated eerence 2005 L 2339 (Fa Dist Ct. App . th Dst 2005

and eh'g denied ( 2005

Petiner's eqest csts and epenses gatin incuding attrney ees did nt

pide ntice t resnden's attne at she culd e hed iabe r attney ees unde

statte that awarded ees in situatins whee an attey brght r deended an acin that

acked subsantia jsticatin there was n mtin eqesting attrney ees rm attey,

there was n mentin that the tra curt was cnsiderng an awad aganst attey and the

Page

00002

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

38/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

39/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

40/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

41/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

42/609

2

o

I

2

7

8

2

22

27

mpy n pr ate r ce t cnanty e the threa ancn n e

actally prdcn me wrtten leal athrty r precedent ppr the p

Sprnae eek t manta It eem M Sprate wld rathe preer attemp

tmdate threaten calln r anctn, r e wha a mall e cmmunty the amy

law ar and hw cky wrd et arnd, a pped preent ce leal analy

e C Order Aer a er nte ta "r Chn e a we and

Cnerclam M Jh' ehal hat nclded allea nppred y law" Pae 3

he pate hae tw chldren, bt whm are nw adlt Ahh Mr Yh c)

ha n latn ppt ad chldren ay lner pran t RS 2509)b) M

Yh c reqet the naca aance Mr h c) a t prde r the

chdre ntn edcation. (Aswer, p 2 ne 1 Id at pge 2 Cughl

clealy taed n eeral ccan, dn the Settlement Cerence, M h and

de Gadne that hee wa lte ppt he clam M h cntned t ently

mpe Mr Chl t pree that pp r the cntn edcatn he party

chdren wh bh recently reached he ae majty Mr Chl cneled M. Jh

in n Jde Garder and ld tha thee wa lte t n chace hat de

Gardne wld rule araby t M Jh tha e. Mr. Chln Mn r

ecnderatn hweer de ealh hat there a ba n law r eek ch a

cntrbn ch, ancn are napprprae he exten they are baed n h e

an e whch n a ecnd ct tme at ta wa pen de Gardnerwa preen

and acr he ale whe M Chln mplred h clent t accept de Gardner

trn dcatn hat he n chld ppr r edcatnal ct cntrn e r

the adl chdren wa a dead end tha wld lkely try he crt patece

At al M Sprnate taed tha M Chln had cdcted n dcery th

cae addtn Mr Chln aledto preent ne dcmentary pece edence at a

n behal M h clam Mr Chln ared ceantly wth the Ct thh

ae

00003

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

43/609

tra and mad sarcastic drgatry rmaks t th Cut M Sggat ad Mr Jshi

thrughu tria. Cur ns tha thr w w r bcns dng u )

hurs tra Mr Sringgat's bjctis wr wundd and cntinuusy susaind

ct in n istanc M Cughin was rd ry bcti ct n and

argud with Cur r mst ings Mr Cughin was adnishd arimaty 1 5

tm by th Cut quit arguing t ask scc qstis t dsctiu askng

qustins caig r a ga cncusin and t ra rm makg dgading rmarks t

b Ms ad Sngga Th Cu nts at at n int a an hibit had

0

1

b add Mr Cughi cud t d th cy ridd by M Srgga n

discy r Cug dmandd a cy ridd at tria satigam susd t b

ig thugh my as My udstandg s that yu ar susd t rid a cy.

Whn askd i had th cy dcumnt M Cughin satd 1 d nt kw

cd sd my tim and ma ngy kng arud Mr Srigga's dcumnt ik

am his assista r w cd ask Srggat t id a cy at tim h s

rcdd intt cdings twic aimaty 5 inus ad tw 12

minuts st g t rargu t int r Srggat rd t th argumnts y

rcig wn acty th cy ad bn idd t M Cughin during dscy

and wr th cy cud b catd h Cu had t adnis Cughin t quit

aguing th it ad ritrat that th hibit had bn admttd Cughin d an

Aswr and Cuntcaim n Ms Jshi's ba that cudd agains unsurtd by

aw; and d an Ost t th rus r rt Mr. Js's assr withu any

acta ga basis. urhr at tria Mr Cug rsd amst n dnc t

su Ms sh's rqusts and cams

h mst ubig asct this cas was Mr. Cughins ud sarcastic ad

dissct rsntan at tia; Mr Cug's iabty t undrsand a baac sht hs

aiur t cnduct dscy and s ack kwdg w gad s idc

and tia cdu A his was cmundd with a cntinuusy antagnstic

Pag 13

9

1

14

17

8

1

23

6

2

28

sking admissi ik bi t ru stats Mr. Cughin citd and thn

00003

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

44/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

45/609

Z

7

8

9

0

13

4

1

7

!q

eseted ad certa ee s ttle cace ersal ablt beg attruted t Ms

s e e ablt tese td at credts t actua ge ad ece a sr

judgmet agas Ms Js s arguabl tesmall small t bared b edera law

ad r te FDC See cles r serces r usbad esa as am eenses

r ecessares wt staute makg we labe terere 3 L R 9 .

I a act a sa agast a we t ecer te reasale aue sal

seces sed dug te ast less er late usbad w ded leag ret

ad w ad t abaded deseted s we secued a decee searate

mateace, e cur ed Swgge Surse s c 88 Ne d 5

972 at ew a satute dg tat a we mus s e usbad ut er

searate ert we e ad searate e te ad cmmu et ade cud surt msel te we's searate e was labe te sal debt

cued b er usad accrdg amed a udgme te lwe cu a

te sta. As a geeral e te cut eaed te seaate ret a we s

lable r te debts er usbad t ed ut weer ta te satute uest was

an ecen te e e d su as ded n e sae e c eaned

ecessa a t e ee cedtrs suc as e stal w suled ecessaes

e a m mecuus usad.

e acts eseted e mata dsslu at bar d t sr dg Ms s

ale a dctre te ecessares aass as M Sggate suggesed at al ad

trugut ts gat r s s curre a abe ded ad emed adu. ee

was swg tat R s culd sut mse

e cu n eck eck 9 9 Ca d 0 eesed a de wc n

eect allwed a usbad t set a reesg udgme debt s ar agas accuedam wed s mer w, sg ta alm was uded te mata dut a

sbad t sr s we ad t a rdar deb ad e w demads dd

ea law cmesate a dscage ne aer unde Cala Cde Cl

cedure 4. Cseuetl te cur decded ta te sad cud t te

Page 5

00003

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

46/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

47/609

I

17

2 Upt-

2

7

Wh l r,

5

7

8

9

2

1

15

amny.

Wheeer

nt entted credt agant pat-due upprt r mne tha he pad hrd pare n h

wn accrd the cut n pez pez, 190 App) 25 Az 309 09 2d 9

emanded the cae r a new ra t detene whether the we had cnented t aw

cea nde ayme made d and de ad he uue

payment t her amny and chd uppt and the gant the requeed cedt

cneqenty awabe

Where a the reut a dpue between the pue the huand made dect

mrtgage payment n a cmmunty prperty the payment cud t be et agant

amy due h we accrdng t he cur n Van rkhen Kener 1 95 a App 3d

Cr) 10 2d 0 under the ue hat he we wa entted pend her amny a he

che t wa hwn hat n ae a judgmen eparatn a dpute are a wheher he we wa requred pay rm an award amy the mnthy mrtgage

paymen n he cmmunty hme which he ccped whch he reed d heeupn

the huband made the payment decty t the mrtgage hde deductng the ame

amunt rm the amny due her he curt apped the genera tet t determne what

paymen made by he huband hd be credted t amny whether the we had the

unetrcted rght t deermne hw the nd were dbured Dawng cedt he

mtgage payment the cut und a cea etcn a t hw the we pent he

eada cae aw uppt the ew that a eada c ha n auhrty t permt et

a uppted pue deb whch wa dcharged n ankuptcy

\3 e 1 1 9 2d 200 1 99 A t wa decded n he cae reated

bew that t wa beynd the authrty the t eter a udgment agant a pue t

whm uppr wa t be pad ubequent ankptcy prceedng n rder eect ae agan the uppt bgatn r mart deb aded by the pue n bankrpcy

tha the upptng pue wa requed t at.

Whee he we ga umed a pa he ppery d puua he

dce wee dcharged n bankptcy and the debt cd n n way be cndeed

age

00003

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

48/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

49/609

8

9

0

II

2

\J

1

8

20

2

U2

6

28

ke e reuee h hi ce ue oehl he cou e h he Cour

Plii wo 5000 e o il eer ie Mr ohi epre e

Mr Couh e ce i ei e o oo he ill or Pii e . Ore

Ae r Pe

he cour i Mloo Mloo 99 1 Ohio App L 523 ( 1991 Ohio App

Cuo Co) i o eee i w eror o e h crei i hi uppo

oio or oe pi icio o ecec ue ri o he

orecloure le o he ri hoe i oe eure ecue he oriil oe o

or he rope w ueke e poue prior o heir iorce ch he e

w o e o he crei o o wre o he wie ueqel Coeue

ccori o he cou he hu iee i i he hoe o he lei

iiuio he or coul o ch lio ch uppor pe o collec o

he jue whe he lei uio coul o e oe o.

Where he hu ouh crei or oehl he pe o e o riou joil

owe poeie he cour i w hw ( 988 W V) 3 2 40 hel i

w poper o ree o o e upi epor o owe o he wie uch

pe whe he e were icurre pior o he poue eprio

he cou More Morel (982 L App h Cir) 425 o 2 1 289 ce e () 430

o 2 99 e pe o coplice wih he uppo oer o coui

oiio icurre o purche uooile i poeio o he wie were o ile

o reuce rer lio peee e chil po we hoe e were

ecoere he u e ie o he elee o he rl coui he

wie i o ree h he houl e e i lieu o ppor pe he wie ler

reqe he u ke he pe oeher wih eerl oher iirec pe

w ou iucie o proe oe i rer h cce ur he perio

ue

A hu who h p coui uooile lo e w proper eie

crei or hi we he o uch pe i hi ccrue lio oliio o her

Pe 19

00003

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

50/609

23

8

9

I

12

1

17

18

19

2

whr h p h no lrl gr h h hun pn on h l wr

n lu of p of h on olgon orng o h ou n Thopon Thopon

(1 983 pp 1 C 428 So 2 8 58 Th ul ppl h ou w h n lon or

hl upo jugn rn n for unl h p l pp o h or n

on oon unl h pr o who pn r rqu o on o

n pn or w h n Alhough h wf h n wr h

hn w ng pn o h l h ll h lnr h onh o

k f h h n h woul h u n quln oun p rl o hr o

hg h h ou foun o h w h rl q n

h hn n on h l hr gr o n rn ho of

lon pn Th ou lo no h h hun h hr w no non

of lon h xpr r o po w w rnpoon T

our gr h rul n h wr nql n unnng

wn wo ul h pr hr on houl pr n lw n ho

no nolng hl ppor Th our gg h h hun w fr o k

ppror for rgng oun olgon n prop ln wh h

w u rj h rgun h h w pronll ll o h for h oun p

n tey o qaoat.

So ou h r n o wn h olgon o wh n uool

or rn w nurr pror o h or n hu h pn n h pou

olg o p po wl

Whr h wf h h u h r r o ln ou houhol

n o hrlf n hln whl h oupl w r h ou n

Youngrg ongrg 1 986 App h Cr 9 So 2 329 woul no pr n

o gn poor prnn lon n hl uppor rrg for onhlf of

h r r rg Th hun h n or o p lon pnn l n

hl uppor ung h pro n whh rg wr u w n n h

g 20

00003

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

51/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

52/609

5

10

1

0

no ucn o c d

S Ro v Ror 1 N 13 887 2 269 994 wi v. Hic 8

Nv. 07,

6 843 2d 828 ( 992 cona illip v Morrow 4 Nv 384 76 P2d l

4 ( 988 .

Hw crou u xd o i e Cou m o p

w Cohln pl om fi o n poiio Me Colin

ru mi omow dn of cdior cul n ocn M oi o p

8 on ccon o wc M oi i o io. Co conrnon in

9 rd w rn nconui o cm ofM Spin docin of

ncr woul ncil d cio xcuin upon M oi pop I

1 would o co o w

2 RS 23 1 o din n fo w u uppod

3 wv: wf m uppo n ou of r epr propr wn no

4 pr prop n v n mnit po m infmiy i

or compn o ppo m

6T o cpion o pocion of p pop on ppli if co

7 ppli ood or vic nc fo if o or po lo it8

of v no n dnd Nvd Supm Cour ld ud cnno 19

d pronl l d RS 123 9 o of i wif wic w incurd

pur o conrc o rn an omol rrir v P . nc 15 N 774

d 41 989 i lkl wo nc will now conud

vd cour fo providin pocio fo pon pop o pou23

c o c r o o uppo odn M o pron o Mr.

o orn M . Spin w rqd nor do uppo

pcldin M Jo n pprop o wrd n of e fc M oi co

o ol ino on l h cdi ccon. M Jo wan pow nd conrol

ofin ol ino o no cd docn o nci

00004

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

53/609

2

J

7

8

9

2

5

6

8

W

22

Radss, M Colin sould no b saiond o fa o a o su a su o

Josi

wa of aalo, Nada as aw as xpssd bud of poof as on o la

and ain d a a nd o do ail d o a spouss saa

rna rt o su crt ar than n that arnng aa t

sablis a loa pods a spaa po. is is nown as in o

d" s S Sulma Sulman, 2 N 0, 161, 558 2d 525, 53031

( 96. Cons aum an b mad a M os s dbs on aons

o wi Mr Jos is sol sinao sould no b iwd as omui dbs in a

ld apa did no osid Ms. oss saus a a. Fu fdal law ma

pn su osidaion n M Josi uad fo d on is ow Cdios

us nd o a sinau of bo pas o a appliaion o di i od pus

ollion o d db om bo ais

s a oia ma, dios would apa o b sd o oon aas

pson (o op of pson inu obliao, i duin maia o

a dio as wn dio is somo o an a o spous o o

o pais o maia, as i Ga . Ga, sua, 0 .2d 83 ( Ci 1 62 .

s a paa ma, is sio appas o poid o ba bans do o pia

a abo so of mo i aouns bi asd bu onl am on

aou (S, also, Dim . Dmik, 1 1 N. 402, 1 5 2d 254 ( 6 (usbands

sinau obo spouss nas on a ad-ou uas amn, ad bo pais

saus on sin insuios a would a mad m join ans of

pop a os of sow, did o aua asf an pop is o wi

On oab pion b wi on spous a a a db a boms a

obaio of o sous as a ma olaw is o doin of nssais,",

disssd abo alou sad sauo ouds fo w usbands pop is

abl fo suppo ofws is di fom a i wi wis op is iabl fo

a 23

00004

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

54/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

55/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

56/609

15

20

25

13

M . lly You d Agst th Wold: Mrrg d orc o Cdtos

rspctv ECONCEVING THE FAY 95 1 96 ob rtw Wso dI

006)2

Mr osh's rgms cocg hs sol sgtory cr dbts lrgy bs o th

4 llsoy pros o h cssrs doctr or hr dscsso d ctos rgrdg

th rchs rd o roo s d S lso Mstkg rrg o Socl ocy

6 V ull Hlto W & ry Lw Schoo Vg Jourl o Socl olcy d

th w Vo p 307 Sprg 004 Th Sttlt ord to Ms os ws tho

lgly c. Mr Cogh dcd s uch cour H should ot sctod

or tht Actlly o y cosd r Coughs cogo o sch c w

w o ry rssv o ory g p t h low o srs o o

I h lgl posso Such lyss dos ot co wthout subst dcto Ths

2 sgly woul ot b so to ly sco Whor th Ord shoul o b

maintaned, the Requesfor Reconsderatograned.

4

6

7

8

9

21

22

24

g 6

00004

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

57/609

J46789

1

Reply Opp si ,

34

21

5

8

Isgnature

ERIA O SERV A MALIG

sut to RP 5(b) I tht g o Zh oghl Esq d tht o

th 2th o M 2009 troll ld t Ro d op o th

w to ll ddssd o

o Sprggt Es.Attor or Ashw Bh203 S Arlgo Avo NV 8950

AFFRAION URSA O RS 239030

1 h drsgd dos hb m t th rdg doum dos ot o th

sol surt r o pso

thd ths 20 Dy o M 2009

16

17

18 Mlss o

Mss Ullo19Ag o Zh oghl Esq

3

g 7

00004

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

58/609

1

L Exhbit # 1- Thry(30) pageslong

INDEX TO EXHBS

6

7

8

9

10

12

13

4

5

6

7

8

19

W

27

e 28

00004

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

59/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

60/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

61/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

62/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

63/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

64/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

65/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

66/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

67/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

68/609

Family

omunit

Wov. Wolf

5.

4-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

L) Medical Debt There is a debt due to St Mmy's Hosptal for $6,735.00and a debt

due to REMSA for $50000. Mr Josh has agreed to be responsible for these debts

and the sae shall be considered as his sole and separate responsibilt

M Debt There s a debt due to Ashk Nanab and a $5,00000debt due to

Rod and Meena Fowler M Josh has agreed to be responsble for these debts and

the sae shall be considered as his sole and separate responsbilt

N General Debt There was no evdence to establish counit debt

Mr Josh has agreed to take the reainng count debt n hs nae that s

outstanding and the debt shall be his sole and separate responsbilit shuld be

noted that M. Josh has lkel incurred an unequal distrbuton of the counit

debt of the partes and the Court nds his teston to be a copelling reason for

aking an unequal distrbution of the counit debt

SPOUSAL SPPORT: The C has found that M Josh is 51 and Ms Josh s

46 and the pmies ea roughl equivalent aounts and that, aer consderation of net incoe

deducton of taxesincludng the aount pad on pang o counit debt, as set fh above,

and n light of the fact the partes ha ve been arried for tent-one (21) ears and Ms Josh has

alwas been eploed during that te, nclusive of the fact that she obtaned a college degree

prior to arriage, both partes beng health and able to workthe Court does not beleve that Ms

112 Nev.Josh is entitled to an award of alon, pursuant to NRS 12515(1)(A),

1355, 929 P2d 196 (1996), and Shydler v. Shydler, 194 Nev 192196954 P2d 3739 (1988)

6 ATTONEYS FEES The Court has the dscretion to award attoes fees n a

dvorce action, pursuant to NRS 125150(3) and Love v. Love, 114 Nev 572, 959 P.2d 523

(1998) There s ther authorit for fees pursuant to NRS 18010(2)(B), and NRS 7.085 Based

on the above and foregongforer counsel for the Defendant s ordered to pa attornes fees n

the aount of $93400 wthn thrt (30) das of ths Order and Decree

DGMENT ND DECEE OF DIVORCE

NOW, THEREFOE IT IS HEEB ORDERED, DDGED ND DECREED

that

000
http:///reader/full/6,735.00http:///reader/full/5,000.00http:///reader/full/6,735.00http:///reader/full/5,000.00

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

69/609

5

10

15

20

25

_ 14

19

23

24

27

1 1 Pant, ASHWIN JOSHI be and he , na and abote dvorced o

2 Defendant, BHARI JOSHI, and that the bond of atron heretofore extng between

3 Pant, ASHWIN JOSHI, and Defendant, BHARI JOSHI, be and the hereb are, doved

4 and the ae hereto are retored to the tat of nge and naed eron

2. he Defendant nae ha be retored to that ofBHARI R DAVE

6 3. he atter, a et forth n the recedng Fndng of Fact, Concon of aw, and

7 Decree of Dvorce, hereb rated, adoted and aroved, and the ae are ordered to co

8 wth the ter of ch

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DAED th da of 2009.

1112

13 DISRIC COR JDGE

16

17

18

21

22

26

2

5-

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

70/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

71/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

72/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

73/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

74/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

75/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

76/609

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

77/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

78/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

79/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

80/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

81/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

82/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

83/609

images, however, he has been ended as attorney of record and cannot access documents in eFlex.ASHWIN JOSHI VS. BHARTI JOSHI.I copying him on this email and suggested that he phone you at 328-3107 directly for resolution.Thank you,Cindy

Cindy FladagerBusiness Systems Analyst II

Court Technology

Second Judicial District Court75 Court StreetReno NV 89501 [email protected]

Hotmail goes with you. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.

000
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Mobile1_052009http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Mobile1_052009

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

84/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

85/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

86/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

87/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

88/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

89/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

90/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

91/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

92/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

93/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

94/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

95/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

96/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

97/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

98/609

0406 P:

Entry:

DO&:ENT TITE CINDINGS OC CA&T, &ON&SIONS OC A?, DE&REE OCDIVOR&E PART5 S:ITTING JO'N P SPRINGGATE, ESF DATE S:ITTED"109 S:ITTED 5 &PARSE5 DATE RE&EIVED JDGE OCCI&E

04-JN-"009101# A:

;; N*$es

Entry:&D RNED 'EARING DATE 0-1-"009 REFESTED 5 JO'N SPRINGATE&AED COR PI&K P 06-04-"009JA

0-JN-"009090# A:

De7!ee *2 D>!*>!*

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

99/609

1-JAN-"0100"06 P:

P!**2 *2 Se!eed

Entry: none.

1-:AR-"0100"03 P:

O!d $* S%*@ &ause

Entry: T!asa7$* 13#"66 - A>>!*>!*e$

Entry: none.

01-APR-"0100406 P:

Re$u!

#9

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

100/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

101/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

102/609

Zach Coughlin, Esq.1422 E. 9thSt. #2Reno, NV 89512tel: 5 !!8 8118"a: 949 $$ 4%2

&icense' in Ne(a'a an' the )nite' States *atent an' +a'e-a /""ice

0oe /'una astingCle o" CoutSecon' 0u'icial 3istict Cout, ashoe Countsent e-ail to: 6oe.hastings7ashoecouts.us, couta'-in7ashoecouts.us,

0anua 29th, 2%12

3ea Cle o" Cout /'una astings,

ello an' congatulations on ou ecentl eco-ing Cle o" Cout "o the Secon' 0u'icial3istict Cout. t as nice to ie"l -eet ou outsi'e the "iling o""ice last +hus'a, 0anua 2$, 2%12.ou ing such a ealth o" e;eience ith ou to such a challenging ;osition, inclu'ing ou ti-eith '-inistation. "not, ;lease let -e no.

NRCP RULE 5. SERVCE >N3 A&N< /A *&E>3NN3 /+ER*>*ERS....NRC* 5Be, Ailing ith the Cout 3e"ine': +he "iling o" ;lea'ings an'othe ;a;es ith the cout as equie' these ules shall e -a'e "iling the-ith the cle o" the cout, ece;t that the 6u'ge -a ;e-it the ;a;es to e "ile' iththe 6u'ge, in hich e(ent the 6u'ge shall note theeon the "iling 'ate an' "othithtans-it the- to the o""ice o" the cle. > cout -a local ule ;e-it ;a;es to e"ile', signe' o (ei"ie' electonic -eans that ae consistent ith technicalstan'a's, i" an, that the 0u'icial Con"eence o" the )nite' States estalishes. > ;a;esigne' electonic -eans in co-;liance ith the local ule constitutes a itten;a;e ;esente' "o the ;u;ose o" a;;ling these ules.The clerk shall not refuse toaccept for filing any paper presented for that purpose solely because it is not

presented in proper form as reuired by these rules or any local rules or

practices.F NRC* 5Be.

*lease "in' elo a co; o" an e-ail ecei(e' "o- then >cting Cout >'-inistato Caig

1

000

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

103/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

104/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

105/609

co-;letel out o" the lue an' "o easons that ae totall unclea to -e, o" eaing a ieF oeco'ing heF o so-ething lie that. 'o not no h she oul' sa that, ut ega'less, sheos ith the ;ulic in an i-;otant ca;acit an' in a situation hee tans;aenc, accountailit,an' "ainess ae usuall atten'ant theeto, so it is cuious that the i'ea o" thee eisting a eco'ing o"he an' o ho she has een han'ling things oul' engen'e such a 'a-atic an' ang es;onse "o-he. Ve cuious, in'ee'. Rega'less, all these e6ections, -ost o" hich ae co-;letel out o" line

ith the teat-ent o" ;e(ious "ilings Ban' "o hich no a'(ance notice as gi(en ith es;ect to thissu''en ue?h;e a'heence to stan'a's "o e6ecting "ilings hich -a o -a not e ase' in "acto la ha(e se(eel 'a-age' - la ;actice an' ;e6u'ice' - client=s -attes. >''itionall, ha(e s;ent ;oal u;a's o" !% hous a''essing this su''en onslaught o" e6ec'tions. oul'a;;eciate the cout co-;ensating -e "o - ti-e lost an' othe 'a-ages settling this -atte in the"o- o" a O25,%%% chec -a'e out to -e.

'o not no hat ha(e 'one that see-s to ha(e u;set he. *eha;s it elates to one instancehee atte-;te' to "ile so-ething at a;;oi-atel 4:55 ;- in the "iling o""ice Bie, not on E"le an'@s. @atheus e"use' to allo -e to "ile, citing that the "iling o""ice as close', 'es;ite the o""icial)nite' States go(en-ent ti-e in'icating that it as "i(e -inutes to the o""icial 3C closing ti-e o"5;-. Ao quite so-e ti-e the "iling o""ice has ha' a cloc on the all that is noticeal "aste than theo""icial ti-e at .ti-e.go( si -inutes. ha(e in"o-e' nu-eous e-;loees o" the "ilingo""ice o" this an' NRC* 5Be. n one instance hee as e"use' in - atte-;ts to "ile so-ething inthe "iling o""ice hee ;esente' the ;lea'ing an' -sel" in line, ;io to 5 ;-, in the Secon' "ilingo""ice an' as e"use', le"t an' use' the estoo-, an' etune' to the line ho;ing to "in' so-eone toas i" coul' as a su;e(iso a question aout this. hile aiting, to e-;loees ehin' the cuicleall ee taling aout -e, an' -uch inteesting co--enta as hea'. calle' out to these toe-;loees an' -entione' that oul' lie to as a su;e(iso a question. nstea', a 3e;ut ascalle' in ho tol' -e to atch - ste;F in a theatening an' o-inous tone.

" @s. @atheus has een 'iecte' he su;e(isos o Cout >'-inistation to e(ie eachan' e(e one o" - "ilings, oul' lie to no that, ;lease, in a''ition to so-e e;lanation as toh such an aange-ent has een ;ut in ;lace an' a co; o" an coes;on'ence, iting, o othe'ocu-entation elate' theeto. +hee ae othe instances si-ila to the one ha(e -entione' ao(e,ut 'o not ish to go into the- at this ti-e, o, ;eha;s, e(e. -eel ant to ;actice la an'atte-;t to ean a li(ing 'oing it. un'estan' thee ae easons "o 3CR 1% an' that the o'el an'e""icient a'-inistation is a (e nole an' i-;otant goal. oe(e, so is the e(en an' -easue'a;;lication o" such ules in a nonIetaliato -anne.

*lease "in' attache' to this coes;on'ence ;intouts o" the E"le eco' o" ecent Noti"icationsin a''ition to the e-ail e6ection notices ha(e ecei(e' "o- E"le, inclu'ing so-e that in'icate thatn Ao-a *au;eis a;;lications -a not e su-itte' (ia E"le B'es;ite the "act that the 'o; 'on-enus on E"le contain choices aing such 'esignations. Authe, it see-s so-e o" the e6ectionsnotice ationales that ha(e een ;o(i'e' ae ase' u;on -attes not "oun' in 3CR 1%, an'equests ha(e -a'e to e ;o(i'e' citation to hat, i" an ule, such e6ections ee ase' ha(e goneunes;on'e' to. *lease in'icate hethe the Secon' has so-e ;osition in this ega', inclu'inghethe thee ae cetain unitten o un;ulishe' house ulesF that ae eing a;;lie'.

S;eci"icall, so-e o" the e6ection notices ha(e ecei(e', inclu'ing -an o" those sent @s.@atheus, 'o not see- to est u;on an itten ule, as 'escie' elo an' in the attache' collection

4

000
http://www.time.gov/http://www.time.gov/

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

106/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

107/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

108/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

109/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

110/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

111/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

112/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

113/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

114/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

115/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

116/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

117/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

118/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

119/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

120/609

x

1251181

1251180

CV11-03051 11-29-2011:12:28:00 AM Notice of Appearance Filed

1251179

CV11-03126 11-29-2011:12:11:39 AM Request for Submission Rejected

1251178


1251177

CV11-03126 11-28-2011:11:50:01 PM Amended Answer Rejected

1250583

CV10-03675 11-28-2011:02:04:51 PM Errata Filed

1249687

FV05-04296 11-25-2011:12:21:16 AM Notice of Appearance Filed

1249686


1249685 CV09-00710 11-24-2011:11:50:08 PM Notice of Appearance Filed

1249684

CV10-03675 11-24-2011:11:45:07 PM Notice of Appearance Filed

1249683

ARB09-00710 11-24-2011:11:38:19 PM Not/Stay Pend BK Not All Deft Rejected

1249682

CV11-00820 11-24-2011:11:22:34 PM Notice of Appearance Filed

1246786

FV05-04296 11-22-2011:01:12:04 AM Mtn Ord Shortening Time Rejected

1246785

CV11-03051 11-21-2011:11:45:01 PM Mtn for Reconsideration Rejected

Number of Filings: 80

User Manual| terms of use| privacy policy| payment policy| support| contact us| about Tybera Development

Group, Inc. 2001-10 Tybera Development Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

001

Resu

Resu

Resu

Resu

Resu

Delete
http://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://manual/fiDefault.htmhttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=termsofusehttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=privacyhttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=paypolicyhttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=supporthttp://washoecourts.com/index.cfm?page=contacthttp://www.tybera.com/http://www.tybera.com/http://www.tybera.com/http://www.tybera.com/http://washoecourts.com/index.cfm?page=contacthttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=supporthttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=paypolicyhttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=privacyhttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/launch?pageAction=termsofusehttp://manual/fiDefault.htmhttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Statushttp://d%7C/downloads%20ie%20and%20firefox/View%20Filing%20Status

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

121/609

From:[email protected]

Sent: Tue 6/28/11 10:24 AMTo: [email protected]

To: Zach Barker Coughlin, Esq. [email protected]


Date: 2011-06-28 00:17:27.0

Subject: Your electronic filing, Re: Filing ID 1102535 - Employment Torts (Wrongful termination) -

WT - Mtn Proceed Forma Pauperis, was rejected by Second Judicial District Court - State

of Nevada.

Case Type: Employment Torts (Wrongful termination) - WT

Document Type: Mtn Proceed Forma Pauperis

Document Type: Complaint - Civil

Reason(s) for rejection:

This is being rejected for the following: 1) An IFP for this case has already been filed as of

6/27/11, you cannot re-submit a new one. 2) You cannot E-FILE an IFP. It needs to be

paper filed. 3) When e-filing documents, they must come in separately. and 4) Your

exhibits in your complaint need to be scanned separately (with there cover sheet) and sent

over as continuations to your PDF document. - Mia 328-3148


Sent: Thu 7/21/11 4:07 PM




Date: 2011-07-21 15:32:37.0

Subject: Your electronic filing, Re: DV08-01168 - Marriage Dissolution Case: Divorce - Without

Children - DO - Master's Recommendation/Ord, was rejected by Second Judicial District

Court - State of Nevada.

ail Print Message http://by148w.bay148.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cp

001

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

122/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

123/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

124/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

125/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

126/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

127/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

128/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

129/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

130/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

131/609

From:[email protected]: Mon 1/23/12 2:39 PM




Date: 2012-01-22 03:11:02.0

Subject: Your electronic filing, Re: CV11-01896 - Employment Torts (Wrongful termination) - WT -

Mtn for Extension of Time, was rejected by Second Judicial District Court - State of

Nevada.

Case Number: CV11-01896


Document Type: Mtn for Extension of Time


The document is being rejected due to the use of green font, as the font is not legible

upon reproduction of the filed document. Please resubmit document with a legible black

font. In addition, the Proof of Service displays on black background with green font.

Please resubmit the Proof of Service on white pleading paper with black font. Any

questions please call Lori at 328-3114.


Sent: Mon 1/23/12 2:39 PMTo: [email protected]



Date: 2012-01-22 03:52:57.0




001

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

132/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

133/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

134/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

135/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

136/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

137/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

138/609


Sent: Wed 1/25/12 12:07 PM




Date: 2012-01-24 20:11:35.0



Nevada.




Document Type: **Continuation


Document does not comply with WCDR 10. Lines of pages must be numbered in the left

margin or on legal pleading paper. Exhibits must be separated by a divider page and

clearly marked with the exhibit number at the top and bottom of the page. If you have

any questions, please call Lori at 328-3114


Sent: Thu 1/26/12 9:11 AM




Date: 2012-01-26 06:03:39.0

Subject: Your electronic filing, Re: FV11-03779 - UIFSA Case (formerly URESA) - UF - Obj to

Master's Recommendation, was rejected by Second Judicial District Court - State of

Nevada.

Case Number: FV11-03779

Case Type: UIFSA Case (formerly URESA) - UF

Document Type: Obj to Master's Recommendation


001

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

139/609





Document does not comply with WCDR 10. Social Security numbers and any financial

account numbers must be redacted from any documents filed with the court. If a social

security or account number is needed for identification purposes, all but the last four

digits of that number must be redacted from the pleadings and documents. Please refer to

page 17 of Exhibit 2. If you have any questions, please contact Lori at 328-3114.


Sent: Thu 1/26/12 9:27 AM




Date: 2012-01-25 23:53:54.0

Subject: Your electronic filing, Re: DV10-00545 - Marriage Dissolution Case: Divorce - With

Children - DC - Opposition to Mtn, was rejected by Second Judicial District Court - State

of Nevada.

Case Number: DV10-00545

Case Type: Marriage Dissolution Case: Divorce - With Children - DC

Document Type: Opposition to Mtn

Reason(s) for rejection:Document does not contain a Notice/Opposition form. If you have any questions, please

call Lori at 328-3114.


Sent: Thu 1/26/12 1:55 PM



001

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

140/609

7/27/2019 8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1

141/609


The case number on the pleading does not match the case caption. Please resubmit your

documents with the correct case number. If you have any questions, please call Lori at

328-3114.


Sent: Fri 1/27/12 4:39 PM




Date: 2012-01-26 23:46:37.0



Nevada.






Reason(s) for rejection:Signature on document must appear on the same document as the text. If you have any

questions, please call Lori at 328-3114.


Sent: Fri 1/27/12 4:47 PM



From: eflex@wa

Documents

8 22 13 01896 0376 ex 1