91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares

    1/5

    SECOND DIVISION

    G.R. No. L-69261 May 13, 1985

    RAJAH LAHUY MINING COMPANY,

    repree!"e# $y %" Pre%#e!", RICAR&O &.

    LACUNA, a!# '()* PACI+IC RICH

    MIN(RAL), INC., repree!"e# $y %" Pre%#e!",

    )(A)*IAN OR&UNA II, petitioners,

    vs.

    JU&G( JAM() . PAJAR(), Re%o!a *r%a

    Co/r", Naa C%"y, ra!0 19, RAU(L

    (NRIU( y AL4AR(, MA. RAMONA

    AR(NILLO y AL4AR(, (MILY )*A. ANA y

    AL4AR( a!# &IR(C*OR O+ MIN() AN&

    G(O)CI(NC(), respondents. 

    Fernando P. Cabato, Emeterio G. Manantan and Rodolfo U. Manzano for petitioners.

    J. Antonio M. Carpio for private respondents.

    AUINO, J.:

    This case is about the jurisdiction of the Regiona

    Tria Court to fi! the co"pensation due to the

    o#ner of a "inera and for prospecting or e!poring therein. Ra$ue Enri$ue%, &a. Ra"ona

     'renio and E"i( Sta. 'na are the registered co)

    o#ners of a parce of and #ith an area of *+

    hectares ocated at arrio -ata, ahu( Isand,

    Cara"oan, Ca"arines Sur.

    On 'ugust */, 012+ the( sued in Civi Case No.

    2+)+34 of the Regiona Tria Court of Ca"arines

    Sur Rajah ahu( &ining Co"pan( and 5est

    6acific Rich &ineras for the pa("ent of just

    co"pensation or renta due to the" as surface

    o#ners as the sine qua non for the grant of authorit( to conduct "ining operations on the

    isand.

    The instant certiorari and prohibition case #as

    fied b( the ahu( co"pan( and 5espar because

    7udge 6ajares refused to dis"iss the co"paint

    on the grounds of non)e!haustion of  

    ad"inistrative re"edies, ac8 of jurisdiction, res

     judicata and prescription.

    5e i"peaded the Director of &ines and -eo)

    Sciences #ho in his co""ent dated &arch 02,

    0129 confir"ed the opinion of the bureau:s senior 

    ega officer, Roberto R. anco, and the vie# of 

    the petitioners that the issues in Civi Case No.

    2+)+34 are #ithin his jurisdiction ;e cited the

    pertinent a#s and reguations.

    6residentia Decree No. 90*, #hich too8 effect on

    7u( 01, 013+, decares prospecting and other 

    "ining operations to be of pubic use and benefit.

    It estabishes the basis, and prescribes the rues

    and procedures, reative to the ac$uisition and

    use of surface rights in "inera prospecting,

    deveop"ent and e!poitation and gives protectionand co"pensation to surface o#ners. It provides<

    SEC. *. Subject to prior  

    notification, prospectors or 

    cai"ants of "inera ands sha

    not be prevented fro" entr( into

    private ands b( surface o#ners

    and occupants #hen prospecting

    or e!poring therein<

    Provided , That an( da"age done

    to the propert( of the surface

    o#ner sha be proper(

    co"pensated<

    Provided, furter , That to

    guarantee such co"pensation to

    the surface o#ner, the prospector 

    or cai"o#ner sha post a bond

    #ith the ureau of &ines and

    -eo)Sciences in an a"ount to be

    fi!ed b( the Director of &ines

    based on the t(pe of propert( andthe prevaiing price of ands in the

    area #here prospecting and other 

    "ining act cities are to be

    conducted and #ith suret( or 

    sureties satisfactor( to the

    Director of &ines. The decision of 

    the Director of &ines "a( be

    Page 1 of 5

  • 8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares

    2/5

    appeaed #ithin five =9> da(s fro"

    receipt thereof to the Secretar( of 

    Natura Resources, #hose

    decision sha be fina.

    The &inera Resources Deveop"ent Decree of 

    013+, 6residentia Decree No. +?/, prescribes a

    "odern s(ste" of ad"inistration of "inera ands

    and pro"otes and encourages the deveop"ent

    and e!poitation thereof. 's a"ended b(

    6residentia Decree No. 0/29, effective &a( *9,

    0132, it provides<

    SEC. 0*. Entr! into Publi" and 

    Private #ands. @ Subject to the)

    provisions of 6residentia Decree

    No. 90*, a $uaified person andAor 

    his authori%ed representativesha not be prevented fro" entr(

    into private ands b( surface

    o#ners andAor occupants thereof 

    #hen prospecting, e!poring and

    e!poiting for "ineras therein. No

    prospecting, e!poration and

    e!poitation of "inera resources

    inside a forest concession sha

    be ao#ed uness proper notice

    has been served upon the

    icensee thereof.

    Tie above ega provisions shoud be read in

    connection #ith Consoidated &ines

     'd"inistrative Order =C&'O> #hich provides.

    SEC. 04. Entr! into lands. @ The

    prospector, ocator, cai"o#ner or 

    "ining operator sha not be

    prevented fro" entr( into private

    ands for the purpose of  

    prospecting, ocating, e!poration,

    deveop"ent and e!poitation of "ining cai"s containing "etaic

    ores, upon prior #ritten

    notification sent to and du(

    received b( the surface o#ner of 

    the and and occupant thereof.

    ;o#ever, if the surface o#ner of 

    the and and occupant thereof =a>

    refuses to ao# the prospector,

    ocator, cai"o#ner or "ining

    operator entr( into the and

    despite his receipt of the #ritten

    notificationB or =b> refuses to

    receive said #ritten notificationB or 

    =c> cannot be found, the

    prospector, ocator, cai"o#ner or 

    "ining operator sha notif( the

    Director of such fact, and

    attaching thereto a cop( of the

    #ritten notification. =Sec. 0. &RD)

    09.>

    SEC. 00. Postin$ of te bond @

    In a cases "entioned in Section

    04 above, the prospector, ocator,

    cai"o#ner or "ining operator sha post a bond #ith the ureau

    of &ines in the a"ount to be fi!ed

    b( the Director based on the t(pe

    of the and and the vaue of the

    trees, pants and other e!isting

    i"prove"ents thereon sha be

    the basis of the co"pensation of 

    the surface o#ner of the and and

    occupant thereof in the

    appropriate cases "entioned in

    Sec. 0*. The order of the Director 

    "a( be appeaed #ithin five =9>

    da(s fro" receipt thereof to the

    secretar( #hose decision sha be

    fina. The appea, ho#ever, sha

    not sta( the Order. =Sec. 0, &RD)

    09.>

    6residentia Decree No. 90* provides for the

    "anner of co"pensating the surface o#ner in this

    #ise<

    SEC. /. The o#ner of a titedpropert( #ithin #hich "inera

    deveop"ent or e!poitation is

    underta8en sha be entited to at

    east one)third =0A/> of the tota

    ro(at( due the cai"o#ner fro"

    the operator based on the

    prevaiing standard ro(at( in the

    area #here said "ining operation

    Page 2 of 5

  • 8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares

    3/5

    is being underta8en, or one

    percent =0 > of the vaue of the

    gross output of "ineras therein

    #here there is no prevaiing

    standard ro(at( or in an( other 

    case #here no ro(at( pa("ent is

    invoved or has been arranged<

    Provided,  That such ando#ner 

    "a( choose to receive pa("ent

    for an( da"age caused to his

    propert( and co"pensation for his

    and at the prevaiing "ar8et price

    or assessed vaue, #hichever is

    higher, pus five percent =9> of 

    the ro(at( due the cai"o#ner on

    the vaue of gross output of 

    "etaic "ineras therein<

    Provided, furter , That if the right

    of the surface o#ner to his and is

    based on inco"pete and tites,

    as ho"esteads, saes, eases and

    other for"s of and right not

    perfected under the torrens

    s(ste", the surface right

    co"pensation sha be one) fifth

    =0A9> of the tota ro(at( due the

    cai"o#ner fro" the operator, or 

    da"ages and pa("ent of the and

    pus three percent =/> of the

    ro(at( due the said cai"o#ner,

    or si!) tenths =?A04> of one

    percent =0> of the vaue of gross

    output as above stated<

    Provided, finall!, That the rate of 

    ro(at( herein set sha app( on(

    in cases of the e!poration,

    deveop"ent and e!poitation of 

    "etaic ores. &etaic ores shabe those containing "etas, such

    as god, copper, siver, iron, nic8e

    and other "ineras #hich the

    Director of &ines "a( deter"ine

    as such b( reguation.

    Section / is i"pe"ented in the foo#ing

    provisions of the C&'O<

    SEC. 0*. Compensation of te

    %urfa"e &'ner and &""upant . @

    In the absence of an agree"ent,

    the surface o#ner of the and and

    occupant thereof sha be entited

    to seect one of the foo#ing

    co"pensations<

     '. For titled lands(

    =0> In the case of 

    prospecting,

    ocation or  

    e!poration of 

    "ining cai")therentas for use

    and occupanc( of 

    the and pus the

    vaue of trees,

    pants and other 

    i"prove"ents

    that are da"aged

    or destro(ed, or

    =*> In the case of 

    deveop"ents

    and e!poitation

    of "ining cai"s

    at the option of 

    the surface

    o#ner and

    occupant =a> one)

    third =0A/> of the

    ro(at( due the

    cai"o#ner 

    based on the

    prevaiing

    standard of  ro(at( in the

    area, or #hen

    there is no

    prevaiing

    standard of  

    ro(at(, etc. =b>

    da"age to the

    Page 3 of 5

  • 8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares

    4/5

    trees, pants and

    other 

    i"prove"ents

    pus five percent

    =9> of the

    ro(at( due the

    cai"o#nerB or 

    =c> sae of the

    and at the fair 

    "ar8et vaue of 

    the and or its

    assessed vaue,

    #hichever is

    higher.

    .. For land 'it in"omplete titles(

    =0> In case of  prospecting,

    ocation or  

    e!poration of 

    "ining cai"s the

    renta for the use

    and occupanc( of 

    the and pus the

    vaue of trees,

    pants and other 

    i"prove"ents

    that are da"aged

    or destro(ed, or

    =*> In the case of 

    deveop"ents

    and e!poitation

    of "ining cai"s

    @ at the option of 

    the surface

    o#ner and

    occupant =a> one)

    fifth =0A9> of the

    ro(at( due thecai"o#ner fro"

    the "ining

    operator, or =b>

    the vaue of the

    trees, pants and

    other 

    i"prove"ents

    that are da"aged

    or destro(ed pus

    three percent

    =/> of the

    ro(at( due the

    cai"o#ner, or =c>

    si!)tenths =?A0 4>

    of one percent

    =0> of the vaue

    of the gross

    output, or =d> the

    fair "ar8et vaue

    of his rights to the

    and.

    The co"pensation referred to

    above based on ro(at( sha be

    pa(abe b( the cai"o#ner, #hie

    the inco"pete tite to andsreferred to in subparagraph

    sha "ean those possessor(

    rights #hich can ripen into rights

    of o#nership registerabe under 

    Torrens S(ste".

    SEC. 0/. )oluntar! A$reements.

    @ The vountar( agree"ent

    bet#een a surface o#ner and

    occupant and the prospector,

    ocator, cai"o#ner or "ining

    operator per"itting the atter to

    enter into and use his and sha

    be registered #ith the &ines

    Regiona Office and the Office of 

    the Register of Deeds concerned.

    The said agree"ent sha be

    binding upon the parties, their 

    heirs, successors and assigns

    =Sec. 0, &RD)09>.

    SEC. 0+. Compensation in Cases

    of *on+Metalli" &res. @ The rateof co"pensation, ro(at(, or 

    pa("ent for da"ages to be paid

    to the and o#ner in cases of the

    e!poration, deveop"ent,

    e!poitation of non)"etaic ores

    e!tracted #ithin his and sha be

    fi!ed b( the Director as he "a(

    Page 4 of 5

  • 8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares

    5/5

    dee" after proper hearing of the

    parties concerned.

    5e hod that the ureau of &ines and -eo)

    Sciences under its organic a#, 6residentia

    Decree No. 0*20, has jurisdiction to deter"ine the

    co"pensation pa(abe to the surface o#ners. The

    Regiona Tria Court has no authorit( to "a8e that

    deter"ination in the first instance.

    To e!pedite "atters, the co"paint of respondents

    Ra$ue Enri$ue%, et a., of #hich the ureau of 

    &ines and -eo)Sciences had aread( been

    furnished, shoud be indorsed to its Regiona

    Director in the ico Region for hearing in

    accordance #ith its Office circuar No. &RD ++,

    series of 0129.

    5;EREORE, the petition is granted. The order 

    den(ing the order of dis"issa is reversed and set

    aside. The Regiona Court is per"anent(

    enjoined fro" hearing Civi Case No. 2+)+34. No

    costs.

    SO ORDERED.

    Maasiar -Cairman, Abad %antos, Es"olin and 

    Cuevas, JJ., "on"ur.

    Con"ep"ion Jr., J., too no part.

    Page 5 of 5