Upload
charmssatell
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares
1/5
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. L-69261 May 13, 1985
RAJAH LAHUY MINING COMPANY,
repree!"e# $y %" Pre%#e!", RICAR&O &.
LACUNA, a!# '()* PACI+IC RICH
MIN(RAL), INC., repree!"e# $y %" Pre%#e!",
)(A)*IAN OR&UNA II, petitioners,
vs.
JU&G( JAM() . PAJAR(), Re%o!a *r%a
Co/r", Naa C%"y, ra!0 19, RAU(L
(NRIU( y AL4AR(, MA. RAMONA
AR(NILLO y AL4AR(, (MILY )*A. ANA y
AL4AR( a!# &IR(C*OR O+ MIN() AN&
G(O)CI(NC(), respondents.
Fernando P. Cabato, Emeterio G. Manantan and Rodolfo U. Manzano for petitioners.
J. Antonio M. Carpio for private respondents.
AUINO, J.:
This case is about the jurisdiction of the Regiona
Tria Court to fi! the co"pensation due to the
o#ner of a "inera and for prospecting or e!poring therein. Ra$ue Enri$ue%, &a. Ra"ona
'renio and E"i( Sta. 'na are the registered co)
o#ners of a parce of and #ith an area of *+
hectares ocated at arrio -ata, ahu( Isand,
Cara"oan, Ca"arines Sur.
On 'ugust */, 012+ the( sued in Civi Case No.
2+)+34 of the Regiona Tria Court of Ca"arines
Sur Rajah ahu( &ining Co"pan( and 5est
6acific Rich &ineras for the pa("ent of just
co"pensation or renta due to the" as surface
o#ners as the sine qua non for the grant of authorit( to conduct "ining operations on the
isand.
The instant certiorari and prohibition case #as
fied b( the ahu( co"pan( and 5espar because
7udge 6ajares refused to dis"iss the co"paint
on the grounds of non)e!haustion of
ad"inistrative re"edies, ac8 of jurisdiction, res
judicata and prescription.
5e i"peaded the Director of &ines and -eo)
Sciences #ho in his co""ent dated &arch 02,
0129 confir"ed the opinion of the bureau:s senior
ega officer, Roberto R. anco, and the vie# of
the petitioners that the issues in Civi Case No.
2+)+34 are #ithin his jurisdiction ;e cited the
pertinent a#s and reguations.
6residentia Decree No. 90*, #hich too8 effect on
7u( 01, 013+, decares prospecting and other
"ining operations to be of pubic use and benefit.
It estabishes the basis, and prescribes the rues
and procedures, reative to the ac$uisition and
use of surface rights in "inera prospecting,
deveop"ent and e!poitation and gives protectionand co"pensation to surface o#ners. It provides<
SEC. *. Subject to prior
notification, prospectors or
cai"ants of "inera ands sha
not be prevented fro" entr( into
private ands b( surface o#ners
and occupants #hen prospecting
or e!poring therein<
Provided , That an( da"age done
to the propert( of the surface
o#ner sha be proper(
co"pensated<
Provided, furter , That to
guarantee such co"pensation to
the surface o#ner, the prospector
or cai"o#ner sha post a bond
#ith the ureau of &ines and
-eo)Sciences in an a"ount to be
fi!ed b( the Director of &ines
based on the t(pe of propert( andthe prevaiing price of ands in the
area #here prospecting and other
"ining act cities are to be
conducted and #ith suret( or
sureties satisfactor( to the
Director of &ines. The decision of
the Director of &ines "a( be
Page 1 of 5
8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares
2/5
appeaed #ithin five =9> da(s fro"
receipt thereof to the Secretar( of
Natura Resources, #hose
decision sha be fina.
The &inera Resources Deveop"ent Decree of
013+, 6residentia Decree No. +?/, prescribes a
"odern s(ste" of ad"inistration of "inera ands
and pro"otes and encourages the deveop"ent
and e!poitation thereof. 's a"ended b(
6residentia Decree No. 0/29, effective &a( *9,
0132, it provides<
SEC. 0*. Entr! into Publi" and
Private #ands. @ Subject to the)
provisions of 6residentia Decree
No. 90*, a $uaified person andAor
his authori%ed representativesha not be prevented fro" entr(
into private ands b( surface
o#ners andAor occupants thereof
#hen prospecting, e!poring and
e!poiting for "ineras therein. No
prospecting, e!poration and
e!poitation of "inera resources
inside a forest concession sha
be ao#ed uness proper notice
has been served upon the
icensee thereof.
Tie above ega provisions shoud be read in
connection #ith Consoidated &ines
'd"inistrative Order =C&'O> #hich provides.
SEC. 04. Entr! into lands. @ The
prospector, ocator, cai"o#ner or
"ining operator sha not be
prevented fro" entr( into private
ands for the purpose of
prospecting, ocating, e!poration,
deveop"ent and e!poitation of "ining cai"s containing "etaic
ores, upon prior #ritten
notification sent to and du(
received b( the surface o#ner of
the and and occupant thereof.
;o#ever, if the surface o#ner of
the and and occupant thereof =a>
refuses to ao# the prospector,
ocator, cai"o#ner or "ining
operator entr( into the and
despite his receipt of the #ritten
notificationB or =b> refuses to
receive said #ritten notificationB or
=c> cannot be found, the
prospector, ocator, cai"o#ner or
"ining operator sha notif( the
Director of such fact, and
attaching thereto a cop( of the
#ritten notification. =Sec. 0. &RD)
09.>
SEC. 00. Postin$ of te bond @
In a cases "entioned in Section
04 above, the prospector, ocator,
cai"o#ner or "ining operator sha post a bond #ith the ureau
of &ines in the a"ount to be fi!ed
b( the Director based on the t(pe
of the and and the vaue of the
trees, pants and other e!isting
i"prove"ents thereon sha be
the basis of the co"pensation of
the surface o#ner of the and and
occupant thereof in the
appropriate cases "entioned in
Sec. 0*. The order of the Director
"a( be appeaed #ithin five =9>
da(s fro" receipt thereof to the
secretar( #hose decision sha be
fina. The appea, ho#ever, sha
not sta( the Order. =Sec. 0, &RD)
09.>
6residentia Decree No. 90* provides for the
"anner of co"pensating the surface o#ner in this
#ise<
SEC. /. The o#ner of a titedpropert( #ithin #hich "inera
deveop"ent or e!poitation is
underta8en sha be entited to at
east one)third =0A/> of the tota
ro(at( due the cai"o#ner fro"
the operator based on the
prevaiing standard ro(at( in the
area #here said "ining operation
Page 2 of 5
8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares
3/5
is being underta8en, or one
percent =0 > of the vaue of the
gross output of "ineras therein
#here there is no prevaiing
standard ro(at( or in an( other
case #here no ro(at( pa("ent is
invoved or has been arranged<
Provided, That such ando#ner
"a( choose to receive pa("ent
for an( da"age caused to his
propert( and co"pensation for his
and at the prevaiing "ar8et price
or assessed vaue, #hichever is
higher, pus five percent =9> of
the ro(at( due the cai"o#ner on
the vaue of gross output of
"etaic "ineras therein<
Provided, furter , That if the right
of the surface o#ner to his and is
based on inco"pete and tites,
as ho"esteads, saes, eases and
other for"s of and right not
perfected under the torrens
s(ste", the surface right
co"pensation sha be one) fifth
=0A9> of the tota ro(at( due the
cai"o#ner fro" the operator, or
da"ages and pa("ent of the and
pus three percent =/> of the
ro(at( due the said cai"o#ner,
or si!) tenths =?A04> of one
percent =0> of the vaue of gross
output as above stated<
Provided, finall!, That the rate of
ro(at( herein set sha app( on(
in cases of the e!poration,
deveop"ent and e!poitation of
"etaic ores. &etaic ores shabe those containing "etas, such
as god, copper, siver, iron, nic8e
and other "ineras #hich the
Director of &ines "a( deter"ine
as such b( reguation.
Section / is i"pe"ented in the foo#ing
provisions of the C&'O<
SEC. 0*. Compensation of te
%urfa"e &'ner and &""upant . @
In the absence of an agree"ent,
the surface o#ner of the and and
occupant thereof sha be entited
to seect one of the foo#ing
co"pensations<
'. For titled lands(
=0> In the case of
prospecting,
ocation or
e!poration of
"ining cai")therentas for use
and occupanc( of
the and pus the
vaue of trees,
pants and other
i"prove"ents
that are da"aged
or destro(ed, or
=*> In the case of
deveop"ents
and e!poitation
of "ining cai"s
at the option of
the surface
o#ner and
occupant =a> one)
third =0A/> of the
ro(at( due the
cai"o#ner
based on the
prevaiing
standard of ro(at( in the
area, or #hen
there is no
prevaiing
standard of
ro(at(, etc. =b>
da"age to the
Page 3 of 5
8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares
4/5
trees, pants and
other
i"prove"ents
pus five percent
=9> of the
ro(at( due the
cai"o#nerB or
=c> sae of the
and at the fair
"ar8et vaue of
the and or its
assessed vaue,
#hichever is
higher.
.. For land 'it in"omplete titles(
=0> In case of prospecting,
ocation or
e!poration of
"ining cai"s the
renta for the use
and occupanc( of
the and pus the
vaue of trees,
pants and other
i"prove"ents
that are da"aged
or destro(ed, or
=*> In the case of
deveop"ents
and e!poitation
of "ining cai"s
@ at the option of
the surface
o#ner and
occupant =a> one)
fifth =0A9> of the
ro(at( due thecai"o#ner fro"
the "ining
operator, or =b>
the vaue of the
trees, pants and
other
i"prove"ents
that are da"aged
or destro(ed pus
three percent
=/> of the
ro(at( due the
cai"o#ner, or =c>
si!)tenths =?A0 4>
of one percent
=0> of the vaue
of the gross
output, or =d> the
fair "ar8et vaue
of his rights to the
and.
The co"pensation referred to
above based on ro(at( sha be
pa(abe b( the cai"o#ner, #hie
the inco"pete tite to andsreferred to in subparagraph
sha "ean those possessor(
rights #hich can ripen into rights
of o#nership registerabe under
Torrens S(ste".
SEC. 0/. )oluntar! A$reements.
@ The vountar( agree"ent
bet#een a surface o#ner and
occupant and the prospector,
ocator, cai"o#ner or "ining
operator per"itting the atter to
enter into and use his and sha
be registered #ith the &ines
Regiona Office and the Office of
the Register of Deeds concerned.
The said agree"ent sha be
binding upon the parties, their
heirs, successors and assigns
=Sec. 0, &RD)09>.
SEC. 0+. Compensation in Cases
of *on+Metalli" &res. @ The rateof co"pensation, ro(at(, or
pa("ent for da"ages to be paid
to the and o#ner in cases of the
e!poration, deveop"ent,
e!poitation of non)"etaic ores
e!tracted #ithin his and sha be
fi!ed b( the Director as he "a(
Page 4 of 5
8/18/2019 91. Rajah Lahuy Mining vs. Pajares
5/5
dee" after proper hearing of the
parties concerned.
5e hod that the ureau of &ines and -eo)
Sciences under its organic a#, 6residentia
Decree No. 0*20, has jurisdiction to deter"ine the
co"pensation pa(abe to the surface o#ners. The
Regiona Tria Court has no authorit( to "a8e that
deter"ination in the first instance.
To e!pedite "atters, the co"paint of respondents
Ra$ue Enri$ue%, et a., of #hich the ureau of
&ines and -eo)Sciences had aread( been
furnished, shoud be indorsed to its Regiona
Director in the ico Region for hearing in
accordance #ith its Office circuar No. &RD ++,
series of 0129.
5;EREORE, the petition is granted. The order
den(ing the order of dis"issa is reversed and set
aside. The Regiona Court is per"anent(
enjoined fro" hearing Civi Case No. 2+)+34. No
costs.
SO ORDERED.
Maasiar -Cairman, Abad %antos, Es"olin and
Cuevas, JJ., "on"ur.
Con"ep"ion Jr., J., too no part.
Page 5 of 5