97870199-Solns-1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    1/11

    Problem Set 1 Solutions

    Lauren Pearce

    January 9, 2011

    1 Serway 3.1.1: Light as an ElectromagneticWave

    PROBLEM: Classical Zeeman Effect or the Triumph of Maxwells Equa-

    tions! As pointed out in Section 3.1, Maxwells equations may be used topredict the change in emission frequency when gas atoms are placed in amagnetic field. Consider the situation shown in Figure P3.1. Note thatthe application of a magnetic field perpendicular to the orbital plane of theelectron induces an electric field, which changes the direction of the velocityvector.

    1.1 A: Magnitude of Electric Field

    PROBLEM: Using Eds=

    dBdt

    show that the magnitude of the electric field is given by

    E=r

    2

    dB

    dt

    1

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    2/11

    SOLUTION: From the diagram, we take the magnetic field to be uniform

    inside of the circle, although it may be time dependent. Since B is the fluxof the magnetic field through the circle, this reduces to:

    B =

    B da

    =

    B da

    =B

    da

    =r2B

    Here we have used the fact that the infinitesimal area element of the surfaceis oriented perpendicular to the surface (using the right hand rule); from thediagram we see that it is then parallel to the magnetic field. This is shownin the diagram:

    Since the radius is held constant, the time derivative of the magnetic fluxis:

    dB

    dt

    =r2dB

    dtNow we want to consider the left hand side of the equation. From electro-

    magnetism, we know that the magnitude of the electric field will be constantalong the circle, and it will be parallel (or antiparallel) to the direction of

    2

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    3/11

    the circle. To find the direction, we use Lenzs Law; the electric field will be

    induced in a direction so that it would induce a magnetic field which opposesthe magnetic field creating it. The magnetic field is growing in the positivezdirection; therefore the electric field will want to create a magnetic field inthezdirection. By the right hand rule, the electric field will be in the direction. Taking E=E, we then have Eds= E ds. Thus we have:

    Eds=

    Eds

    =E

    ds

    =2rE

    Setting the two sides of the equation equal, we find: Eds=

    dBdt

    2rE=r2dB

    dt

    E=r

    2

    dB

    dt

    E= r2 dBdt

    We have found the magnitude of the field as requested in the problem;however, it is also important to note that it is in the negative direction.We will need this below.

    1.2 B: Change of Speed

    PROBLEM: UsingF dt= m dv, calculate the change in speed, v, of the

    electron. Show that ifr remains constant,

    v=erB

    2me

    3

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    4/11

    SOLUTION: First we ask what force we should be concerned with here.

    Let us think about the magnetic force, which is qv B. If we do the crossproduct, we see that v B will be pointed out from the center of the cir-cle. However, we assume that the electron is forced to go along in a circle;therefore there must be some restoring force that counteracts this. Anyway,because we assume the electron goes in a circle, this means that we dontcare about the magnetic force, which leaves the electric force.

    If the radius remains constant, then the magnitude of the electric fieldalso remains constant. Therefore, the magnitude of the force on the particle,F = |eE|, is also constant. We will use e for the MAGNITUDE of theelectron; therefore it is a positive number. Thus we have F =eE.

    To be absolutely clear about signs, we will use the equation above in theformdFdt = medv, using me for the mass of the electron. Then we have:

    eEdt= medv

    er

    2

    dB

    dt dt= medv

    er

    2 dB= medv

    This shows us that the component of the velocity that will change is thecomponent that is going around in the circle, as we expect. Now we need tobe exceedingly careful with the signs. We are asked to find the change in thevelocity of the electron. While the velocity of the electron is by definitionalways postivie, the change in the velocity can be positive or negative; thevelocity can increase or decrease. Let us first consider whether it will increaseor decrease.

    Now let us think of the direction of the force acting on the electron. Wealready determined that the electric field was pointing in the direction,

    which is the opposite direction as how the electron is travelling. The force,as we saw above, is in the positive direction because (since the electron isnegatively charged), it is in the opposite direction as the electric field. Sincethe force is then parallel to the direction that the electron is moving, it shouldaccelerate the electron. Then we expect v to be positive.

    4

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    5/11

    Now let us figure this out in the mathematics. We set v= vto find:

    r2

    dB = medv

    r

    2dB =medv

    Solving for dv, we find:

    dv= er

    2medB

    We want to integrate this; we must take care with our limits of integration.

    The particle is initially moving with speed v and after the magnetic field isturned on, it has speed v + v. Initially, the magnetic field is zero, but afterit is turned on, it has the value B . We assume that r is constant and take itoutside of the integral. Thus we have:

    v+v

    v

    dv= er

    2me

    B

    0

    dB

    v+ vv = er

    2meB

    v=erB

    2me

    As expected, this will be positive. Note how important it is that we takee to be the magnitude of the electric charge.

    1.3 C: Change in Angular Frequency

    PROBLEM: Find the change in angular frequency, , of the electronand calculate the numberical value of for B = 1 T. Note that this is alsothe change in frequency of light emitted accordinate to Maxwells equations.Find the fractional change in frequency, /, for an ordinary emission lineof 500 nm.

    SOLUTION: First we recall how angular velocity is related to the speedthat the particle is moving at. This is just from circular motion:

    =v

    r

    5

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    6/11

    Sincer is constant, this gives us:

    =v

    r

    Substituting from the previous section, we have:

    = eB

    2me

    Now we substitute the particular numbers, recalling that e is negative. Ifwe use MKS units, the result will be radians per second.

    =

    1.61019 C

    1 T2 1

    9.11031 kg

    = 8.81010 rad

    sec

    To find the fractional change in the frequency, we need to find . We cando this from the information given, which is the wavelength of the associatedemission line. We use:

    = 2f= 2c

    In the last equality, we have used the fact that f = c. Substitutingnumbers, we have:

    = 23.0108 m/s

    500109 m

    = 3.81015 rad

    sec

    Finally we have:

    =

    8.81010

    3.81015 = 2.3105

    6

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    7/11

    1.4 D: Emission Line Split into Three

    PROBLEM: Actually, the original emission line at 0 is split into threecomponents at 0: 0 , 0, and 0 + . The line at 0 + isproduced by atoms with electrons rotating as shown in Figure P3.1, wherasthe lines at 0 is produced by atoms with electrons rotating in theopposite sense. The line at 0 is produced by atoms with electronic planesof rotation oriented parallel to B. Explain.

    SOLUTION: We first note that the electron is just orbiting the nucleusin the atom in any old way; it doesnt have to be lines up the magnetic field.The best way to picture this is that you have a bunch of atoms, and the

    circular orbits of the electrons are aligned more-or-less randomly. Some willbe lined up with the magnetic field as shown in the image; then everythingwe derived will be correct.

    Some will be lined up going around in the opposite direction. There areseveral ways of accounting for this change; the important thing is that youpick up the correct number of sign changes. In the way I look at it, thischanges the direction of ds and da, since the orientation of the circle isdefined by the motion of the electron. Now we need to carefully count howmany negative sign changes we find. The flux of the magnetic field willchange by a sign (because B doesnt change). Similarly, the electric fieldwill be induced in the direction ofds, instead of the opposite direction, andthis will pick up a sign. Thus we find the same result for E, which we shouldhave expected. (The electric field is just induced by the magnetic field, anddoesnt have anything to do with the electron.)

    However, now we need to think about the next part. Now we have theelectric field is parallel to the direction that the electron is going. Since thecharge of the electron is negative, this means that the force is antiparallelto the direction that the electron is going. Therefore it is going to slow theelectron down, instead of speeding it up. So we expect it to have a sign

    change. Where does this come into the math? This is a very subtle point.The force hasnt changed direction, so we still get the same VECTOR v:

    v=erB

    2me

    7

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    8/11

    However, we now have v= vv, and so the change in speed is given by:

    v + v= v + erB2me

    =

    v

    erB

    2me

    We keep the negative sign out in front because thats the direction theelectron is moving. Therefore, we see that the change in the SPEED (themagnitude of the velocity) is negative. Of course, this then changes the signof .

    Now let us consider the case where the plane of the electron is parallel toB. Since the area elementda is perpendicular to the plane of the electron,it is also perpendicular to B. Therefore Bda= 0, and following as in theabove sections, = 0.

    2 Serway 3.2.2

    PROBLEM: The temperature of your skin is approximately 35 C. Whatis the wavelength at which the peak occurs in the radiation emitted fromyour skin?

    SOLUTION: We begin by modelling the human body as a blackbody.Then we can use Weins displacement law to find the maximum wavelength.Weins displacement law is:

    maxT = 2.898103 mK

    We solve this for the maximum wavelength:

    max =2.898103 mK

    T

    We see that we want to substitute the temperature in Kelvin, not Celsius.We can convert by adding 273, which gives us the temperatue 308 K. Wefind:

    max =2.898103

    308 m = 9.41106 m

    8

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    9/11

    In nanometers, this is 9410 nm.

    3 Serway 3.2.3

    PROBLEM: A 2.0 kg mass is attached to a massless spring of force con-stantk = 25 N/m. The spring is stretched.40 m from its equilibrium positionand released.

    3.1 A: Classical Energy and Frequency of Oscillation

    PROBLEM: Find the total energy and frequency of oscillation according

    to classical calculations.

    SOLUTION: We recall that the total energy of a simple harmonic oscil-lator is:

    E=kA2

    2

    where A is the amplitude of the oscillation. We assume that the spring isreleased from rest; then the amplitude is .40 m. Substituting this, we have:

    E=25 N/m

    2 (.40 m)2 = 2.0 J

    Next we consider the frequency of oscillation. We first find the angularfrequency:

    =

    k

    m=

    25 N/m

    2.0 kg = 3.5 rad/sec

    Now we find the frequency by dividing by 2:

    f=

    2 =

    3.5

    2 Hz =.56 Hz

    3.2 B: Quantum Number

    PROBLEM: Assume that the energy is quantized and find the quantumnumber,n, for the system.

    9

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    10/11

    SOLUTION: If the energy is quantized then it has to satisfyEn =nhf.

    We solve this for n:n=

    Enhf

    Now we substitute fand the energy from the first part of the problem,along with Plancks constant, to find:

    n= 2.0 J

    6.631034 Js.56 Hz= 5.41033

    This is a very large number.

    3.3 C: Energy in a Quantum Change

    PROBLEM: How much energy would be carried away in a 1-quantumchange?

    SOLUTION: To find the amount of energy in a one quantum change, wesimply need to evaluate hf:

    E= hf= 6.631034 Js.56 Hz = 3.71034 J

    This is a very small number.

    4 Serway 3.2.4

    4.1 A: Total Power Radiated Per Unit Area by Tung-

    sten Filament

    PROBLEM: Use Setans law to calculate the total power radiated perunit area by a tungsten filament at a temperature of 3000 K. (Assume thatthe filament is an ideal radiator.)

    10

  • 8/12/2019 97870199-Solns-1

    11/11

    SOLUTION: First we recall Stefans Law, which relates the power per

    unit area,P/A, to the temperature in Kelvin through the constant . Specif-ically substituting numbers, we have:

    P

    A=T4

    = 5.7108 W

    m2K4 (3000 K)4

    = 4.6106 W/m2

    4.2 B: Surface Area of Filament in a Lightbulb

    PROBLEM: If the tungsten filament of a lightbulb is rated at 75 W, whatis the surface area of the filmanet? (Assume that the main energy loss is dueto radiation.)

    SOLUTION: Rearranging the equation found above, we have:

    A= P

    4.6106 W/m2

    Substituting 75 W for the power gives us:

    A= 75 W

    4.6106 W/m2 = 1.6105 m2

    We can also write this as 16 mm2, which is a reasonable size for a lightbulb.

    11