A non equilibrium Ising model of turbulence

Davide FarandaLSCE-IPSL, CEA Saclay l’Orme des Merisiers,

CNRS UMR 8212 CEA-CNRS-UVSQ,Universite Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Tel.: +33-169081142Fax: +33-169087716

davide.faranda@lsce.ipsl.frMartin Mihelich

Laboratoire SPHYNX, SPEC, CEA Saclay, CNRS UMR 3680,Universite Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Berengere DubrulleLaboratoire SPHYNX, SPEC, CEA Saclay, CNRS UMR 3680,

Universite Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

December 15, 2015

Abstract

We introduce a model of interacting lattices at different resolu-tions driven by the two-dimensional Ising dynamics with a nearest-neighbor interaction. We study this model both with tools borrowedfrom equilibrium statistical mechanics as well as non-equilibrium ther-modynamics. Our findings show that this model keeps the signatureof the equilibrium phase transition. Moreover the critical temperatureof the equilibrium models correspond to the state maximizing the en-tropy and delimits two out-of-equilibrium regimes, one satisfying theOnsager relations for systems close to equilibrium and one resemblingconvective turbulent states. Since the model preserves the entropyand energy fluxes in the scale space, it seems a good candidate forparametric studies of out-of-equilibrium turbulent systems.

1 Introduction

Equilibrium systems can often be described through well founded statisticalmechanics, built up from the classical laws of thermodynamics. In this sense,they represent an exception with respect to most systems found in nature,which are subject to flux of matter and energy to and from other systemsand/or to chemical reactions. Most systems are therefore intrinsically out-of-equilibrium and their description often remains beyond the scope of present

1

arX

iv:1

309.

3437

v2 [

cond

-mat

.sta

t-m

ech]

14

Dec

201

5

statistical mechanics [13]. Among all out-of-equilibrium systems, we maysingle out those leading to (out-of-equilibrium) steady states, called NESS,which exhibit a constant average energy. Intense research efforts have thusfocused on understanding how much such states differ from the equilibriumstates of corresponding ideal systems (without say, forcing and dissipation).For example, there is now strong evidence that the large scales of the steadystates of 2D or quasi-2D turbulent flows can be described as equilibriumstates of the corresponding Euler equation [4, 24], whereas such flows aresubject to non-zero energy or enstrophy fluxes through scales, characteristicof out-of-equilibrium dynamics. On the other hand, there has been recentnumerical and theoretical evidence of steady states in out-of-equilibriumsystems that do not correspond to any equilibrium states, such as an Isingmodel driven by a temperature gradient [22], and a quantum open systemin contact with two reservoirs [10]. One way to get some insights about whyand how NESS approach their equilibrium counterpart relies on the studyof simple toy models which are analytically tractable. ASEP (symmetricsimple exclusion processes, also named zero range processes) have become aparadigm of non-equilibrium toy models on a lattice [6] which mimic diffu-sion phenomena. Such models are however not appropriate to understandthe turbulent NESS, because it lacks an essential ingredient: the develop-ment of an energy cascade over a wide range of scales. This was recognizedby [3], who devised a dissipative forced zero range process on a Cayley (self-similar) tree identified in the article to a scale space. This process exhibitsa transition between a quasi-equilibrium regime and a far-from equilibriumregime where net fluxes through scales were observed. However, this exam-ple does not exactly describe turbulent NESS, for which both the non-zeroenergy flux and the equilibrium state are superposed.

In the present article, we study a new toy model of “turbulent process”based on the Ising model [11,16]. It approximates magnetic dipole momentsof atomic spins through discrete variables with Boolean-like distribution (+1or 1), interacting with their nearest neighbors on a lattice. The propertiesof the model at thermal equilibrium are well established and allow for theidentification of second order phase transitions in 2D [19, 20]. The idea ofexploring the existence of non-equilibrium steady states (NESS) of the Isingmodel as a paradigm for other phenomena hails from the work of [9], whodevised simple models for out-of-equilibrium dynamics when in contact witha thermostat. Other modifications of the Ising model in the same spirit havebeen suggested by [5,7,8,14,21–23] where the addition of a temperature gra-dient within the lattice sets the system out of equilibrium. However, noneof these variants of the Ising model so far contain the dynamics of energy orenstrophy fluxes through scales. In order to take into account this feature,we propose a model of two interacting lattices. Lattice A is the reference:its dynamics is iterated at temperature TA, then the configuration is copiedto lattice B and an iteration is performed at TB. Finally the first lattice is

2

updated with the changes applied to lattice B and currents are computed asthe number of spins changed within these dynamical steps. Coarse grainingeffects are monitored during this procedure by downgrading the resolutionof lattice B.

The paper is organized as follows: we introduce the two-lattice model inSection 2. We then perform two different analyses. Section 3 is devoted tothe study of possible traces of classical equilibrium phase transitions in themodel dynamics. We then use non-equilibrium tools in Section 4 to studythe thermodynamics of the system. We will show that coarse grain effectsalone introduce non equilibrium dynamics on the model and that such dy-namics depend both on the temperature gradient between the two latticesA and B but also on the temperature TA of the fine grained grid. Finally,we discuss in Section 5 the possible physical implications of our findings.

2 Model of two interacting lattices at differenttemperatures.

We introduce a model consisting of two square lattices A and B, each ofthem individually obeying the classical 2-D Ising Kawasaki (conserving av-erage magnetization) dynamics with a nearest-neighbor interaction. Thetwo lattices evolve at different temperatures TA and TB and may be of dif-ferent sizes LA and LB. A schematic representation of the dynamics of themodel is reported in Figure 1. First, lattice A is updated with a MonteCarlo step at temperature TA ; then, if LA 6= LB, the coarse grain operationis performed: for each spin of the lattice at lower resolution we count thenumber of corresponding spins in at full resolution and, if the majority ispositive (black in the figure) we assign a positive spin to the correspondingcoarse grain position. We then perform a Monte Carlo step at the tempera-ture TB on lattice B. Eventually we update grid A by reversing all the spinswhich correspond to a change in lattice B.

Non-equilibrium effects can be tracked measuring non-zero average fluxesj(t) circulating in the two-lattice system. The most natural definition for jcomputes the number of spins changed on grid A as an effect of the coarsegrain and Monte Carlo steps performed on grid B at temperature TB. Inthe following we will describe some of the system properties, the role ofnon-equilibrium effects and of the phase transitions. We will see that thereis no trivial complete description of the non-equilibrium effects using solelystatistical tools devised for equilibrium dynamics. However, relevant quan-tities of equilibrium dynamics still play an important role when the systemis set out of equilibrium.

3

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the two lattices model. In this rep-resentation the size LB of grid B is smaller than LA. Vertical steps aredynamical and related to the iteration of the Ising dynamics at temperatureTA or TB. The horizontal steps describe the way the operations of coarsegrain and fine grain are performed.

4

3 Equilibrium analysis and phase transitions

We have investigated the dynamics of the systems for different tempera-tures TA and TB and different sizes LA and LB from L = 8 to L = 256.On this range we have found that results do not qualitatively depend onthe resolution. Therefore, in the following, we will consider two typical ex-periments: one where the two grids are at the same resolution but at twodifferent temperatures LA = LB = 64 and another one where the two gridsare at different temperatures and resolutions LA = 64 and LB = 8. Foreach experiment we compute the relevant quantities of the Ising dynamicson 1000 steps as described in Fig. 1. The temperature range analyzed is(TA, TB) ∈ [Tc − 1, Tc + 1]2, Tc = 2/ ln(1 +

√2) being the reduced critical

temperature for two-dimensional square lattices.We first notice that the system sets very quickly in a stationary state wherethe magnetization and the energy fluctuate around a well-defined value.Hence, it is interesting to see whether such steady states still undergo aphase transition at a certain temperature set (TA, TB) ; and to assess howsuch a transition depends on the coarse grain effects. In order to do so, foreach experiment we have computed the time and space average magneti-zation 〈M〉, and the first zero of the auto-correlation function C(τ) of thetime series of magnetization. For a classical Onsager square lattice, C(τ) isknown to decrease exponentially with a characteristic time which divergesfollowing a power law near the critical temperature Tc, whereas 〈M〉 satis-fies a critical power-law scaling near the same critical temperature Tc. Bothquantities are represented in Fig. 2 for the non coarse grained experiment(left plots) and the coarse grained experiments (right).

We first observe that the absolute value of 〈M〉 (upper panels of Fig. 2)reproduces the equilibrium Ising critical transition but with a higher pseudo-critical temperature Tc(TA, TB). When no coarse grain is applied to the gridLB the picture looks symmetric with respect TA and TB. In this sense, onecould define Tc(TA, TB) by following the curve on the TA, TB plane where〈M〉 changes abruptly. On the other hand, when the resolution of LB isdecreased (top right panel of the same figure), this curve does not look sym-metric with respect to TA and TB. The transition looks sharper when thetemperature of the coarse grained lattice LB is varied. Our model also re-spects the symmetry of the magnetization with respect to zero: positive andnegative magnetization are obtained with equal probability.Further signatures of phase transitions can be found computing the auto-correlation function C(τ) of the magnetization time series 〈M(t)〉. The firstzero of C(τ) is reported in the lower panels of Fig. 2. In both cases weobserve an increase of the resulting time scale in a region of the (TA, TB)plane which can be readily identified as a critical temperature. This regionmatches the region of maximal variations of the average magnetization 〈M〉.

5

1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

TA

TB

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

TA

TB

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

TA

TB

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

TA

TB

0

50

100

150

200

250

Figure 2: Average magnetization 〈M〉 (upper panels) and first zero of theautocorrelation function C(τ) as a function of the temperatures TA and TB.Left panel: lattice without coarse grain LA = LB = 64. Right panel: coarsegrain with LA = 64, LB = 8

6

3 4 5 6

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

S

T

E

0.9<M<0.910.93<M<0.940.96<M<0.970.98<M<0.99

Figure 3: Numerical verification of the Onsager relations close to equilib-rium. The temperature T is a good linear function of the Shannon EntropyS and the energy E, when the magnetization M is kept constant. Differentcolors correspond to different M intervals as described in the legend.

7

We now turn to analyze the effect of the temperature as a function of theentropy S and the energy E. In fact, as predicted by Onsager, if the systemremains close to equilibrium, one must find: ∂E/∂S|M = TA, where M isthe magnetization at the end of the simulation. The entropy used here isthe usual Shannon Entropy computed in information theory which measuresthe disorder of lattice A at the end of the simulation:

S = −∑i,j

p(i, j)log2(p(i, j))

with p(i, j) the probability of observing a spin up or down at the position(i, j). The linearity of such a relation can be verified in Fig. 3 where thequantities E,S, TA are plotted for four different values of M .

In the next section we will perform a non equilibrium analysis consid-ering thermodynamic quantities such as the entropy and the currents, andunderstand whether such a phase transition is still relevant when the systemis set out of equilibrium.

4 Non-equilibrium analysis

We start the analysis verifying that the model proposed in this section pos-sesses a genuine non equilibrium dynamics and then comment on some of itsrelevant thermodynamic properties. We will use the definition of currentsalready described above, i.e. we define j as the number of spins changedon lattice A after the steps performed on lattice B. We rescale j to includeonly the effects of the temperature change.In Fig. 4 we present the behavior of j for the two experiments detailedbefore: no coarse grain on the left panels and coarse grain on the right.Colors represent the temperature TB. For the non coarse grained dynamicswe immediately see that, for each temperature – each color – TB the cur-rent j increases proportionally to ∆T = TB − TA. This is the signature ofFourier’s relation when the system is driven out of equilibrium and the heattransfer can be considered conductive. However, for higher temperature gra-dients and depending on TB this regime is broken and currents saturate ata specific value. This phenomenon is facilitated for coarse grained dynamics(right panel) where the saturation is indeed observed at all temperatures TB.

Another important proof of far-from-equilibrium properties relies on theexistence of a maximum of entropy production and the relation linking thismaximum to the temperatures TA and TB and to the currents and theirconductive/convective nature. In fact, as pointed out in [17,18], for other outof equilibrium models such as the zero range process, a maximum of entropy

8

−1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.50

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

∆T

j

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

−1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.50

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

∆T

j

Figure 4: Current j between grids B and A, as a function of the temperaturegradient ∆T = TB − TA. The color scale represents temperature TB. Left:lattices without coarse grain LA = LB = 64. Right: coarse grain withLA = 64, LB = 8

production is clearly recognizable and falls between these two regimes. In ourmodel we will define the macroscopic Entropy Production σ as the product ofthe fluxes by the corresponding thermodynamics forces responsible for suchfluxes. It is important to point out that this entropy is different from themicroscopic entropy defined above. In terms of currents and temperaturesthe Entropy Production is written as:

σ = j

(1

TB− 1

TA

), (1)

where j is the current. Figure 5 represents σ as a function of the currentsj and it is colored according to TA (upper panels) and TB (lower panels).We analyze first the non coarse grained dynamics (on the left panels) wheremaxima of σ are observed for each curve of TB. Moreover, each curve hasthe maximum located at almost the same temperature TA which roughlycorresponds to the critical temperature of the equilibrium Ising model Tc.Moreover, the maxima always fall in between the conductive and convectiveregimes. This is even more evident when analyzing the plots for the coarsegrained dynamics (right panels) as the separation between these two regimescorresponds to a sharp change of σ especially at lower temperatures TB.In this case, the location of the maximum also corresponds to the criticaltemperature Tc.

This latter fact is indeed relevant for two reasons: first, it points to thefact that equilibrium properties and relevant quantities of equilibrium dy-namics, e.g the critical temperature Tc, still play an important role when thesystem is set out of equilibrium. Second it correlates to the phenomenon ofself-organized criticality widely invoked to explain the fact that many physi-cal systems set into non equilibrium states close to their critical temperatureactually display “exact” critical properties [1, 2]. Here the states obtained

9

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07−0.02

−0.015

−0.01

−0.005

0

0.005

0.01

σ

j

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07−0.02

−0.015

−0.01

−0.005

0

0.005

0.01

σ

j

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35−0.08

−0.06

−0.04

−0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

σ

j

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35−0.08

−0.06

−0.04

−0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

σ

j

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

Figure 5: Entropy production σ as a function of the currents j. Left panels:lattice without coarse grain LA = LB = 64. Right panels: coarse grain withLA = 64, LB = 8. The color scale represents TA (upper panels) and TB(lower panels).

following a maximum entropy production principle coincide with the onesobtained invoking the self organized criticality.

Finally, we can study the distribution of σ in the plane (TA, TB) as shownin Fig. 6. Note that the scales of σ for the non coarse grained dynamics(left panel) is different from the one of the coarse grain simulations (rightpanels). The latter case shows a sharper σ gradient than the former case.This is consistent with what is observed in Fig. 5.

The previous analysis suggests that the coarse graining step induces dis-continuous changes in the system thermodynamic properties. We study thiseffect introducing a cascade of coarse grain operations and build a model ofinteracting lattices of different sizes (or, conversely, scales). In the numeri-cal experiment, we start from a full resolution LA = 64 and halve it severaltimes. At each scale we perform a dynamic Ising step. The intermediateresolutions considered are LB = 32, LC = 16 and LD = 8. We updatelattice A after the dynamical steps performed on D.

We first verify that the entropy production is constant through such ascale space. In order to do so we compare several values of σ obtained at

10

1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.81.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

TA

TB

−14

−12

−10

−8

−6

−4

−2

0

2

4

6

x 10−3

1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.81.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

TA

TB

−0.06

−0.04

−0.02

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

Figure 6: Entropy production σ (in color scale) as a function of the temper-atures TA and TB. Left panel: lattice without coarse grain LA = LB = 64.Right panel: coarse grain with LA = 64, LB = 8.

different change in resolutions. For example, we can compare σA→B withσB→C and σC→D where the resolution has changed by half, σA→C withσB→D and compare all of them with σA→D where the resolution changedby a factor 8. Results are shown in Fig. 7. One can observe that thereis no substantial difference among the entropy productions defined. Thisproperty is therefore reminiscent of the constant flux of energy observedin turbulence and necessary to explain the famous k−5/3 energy spectrum.However if one looks at the shape of such curves and compare them withthe ones shown in Fig. 5 several differences emerge. In the previous analysiswe have performed an abrupt coarse graining shrinking the resolution bya factor 8 in one go. Here we have gone through several operations wherethe resolution has been halved. As a result of this smoother procedure,the curves of entropy production shown in figure 7 show neither a clearmaximum nor a transition between convective and conductive regimes. Theconvective regime is therefore closely linked to an abrupt change of latticeresolution (or scale).

5 Discussion

In this paper we have obtained an effective way to introduce a genuine nonequilibrium Ising dynamics with an interaction in the scale space reproduc-ing some properties of turbulent systems.

Previously, other authors have investigated the possibility of buildingsuch a model by using only a one lattice dynamics and introducing thetemperature gradient within the site of the lattice. Although such a systempossesses a rich dynamics with an interesting variety of metastable andstable states, they do not allow for interaction among different scales andpresents discontinuities in the temperature field which hinder simple tests of

11

1/2

1/4

1/8

0

0.2

0.4−0.1

−0.05

0

0.05

0.1

Resolutionj

σ

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

Figure 7: Entropy production σ as a function of the currents and the changein the resolution.. The color scale depicts the temperature of the lattice atthe lower resolution.

Onsager relations as well as out of equilibrium conjectures like the existenceof maxima of entropy production.

Our model satisfies such constraints by composing the dynamics of twointeracting lattices at different temperatures. This model not only respectsFourier’s law dE/dS|N = TA, but also features the possibility of havingthe second lattice at a coarse grained resolution, as it happens in severalphysical phenomena. Moreover, clear differences arise when comparing thecoarse grained dynamics with the one of two lattices having the same spatialresolutions. For example, the coarse grained dynamics exhibit a breakdownof Fourier’s law (and therefore of conductive heat transfer) introducing, athigh temperature gradients, convective fluxes confirmed by the appearanceof a negative temperature in the energy-entropy relation. Moreover, thestates maximizing the entropy production are located between conductiveand convective regimes and correspond to the critical temperature of theequilibrium Ising dynamics.

The convective states are new features for the Ising dynamics and can-not be observed e.g. by adding an external magnetic field to the system.In addition, the introduction of the temperature gradient between the twodifferent lattices preserves the symmetry spin up/down which is broken withthe addition of magnetic fields.

Despite its relative simplicity, our model displays coexistence of quasi-equilibrium states at the largest scale, with non-zero average fluxes at smallerscale. It therefore shows that turbulent flows may not be so exceptional, andrather be representative of a wide class of out-of-equilibrium systems with

12

both spatial and scale dynamics.An interesting outcome of our model could be the development of more

realistic models of natural phenomena. For example, several models of at-mospheric convection are based on the equilibrium Ising dynamics [12, 15].We believe that a better representation of atmospheric transport can beachieved introducing our non equilibrium dynamics modeling both conduc-tive and convective heat transfer. On the other hand, one can imagine thatthe second lattice is just some coarse grained properties of the first one andthat temperature TB maps some properties in the scale space.

Finally, the fact that the maxima of entropy production correspond tostates at critical temperature for the lattice suggests that there is a linkbetween the maximum entropy production principle and self-organized crit-icality. The latter is often invoked to explain why out of equilibrium systemssettle into states close to their critical manifolds but without a solid physicalunderlying motivation. We believe that such a connection might representa step in solving this issue, despite requiring further investigations.

6 Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge discussion and exchanges with S. Thalabard andB. Saint Michel. DF has been partially supported by the ERC Grant A2C2(No. 338965)

References

[1] Per Bak. Self-organized criticality. Physica A: Statistical Mechanicsand its Applications, 163(1):403–409, 1990.

[2] Per Bak, Chao Tang, and Kurt Wiesenfeld. Self-organized criticality.Physical review A, 38(1):364, 1988.

[3] Eric Bertin and Olivier Dauchot. Far-from-equilibrium state in a weaklydissipative model. Physical review letters, 102(16):160601, 2009.

[4] Freddy Bouchet and Antoine Venaille. Statistical mechanics of two-dimensional and geophysical flows. Physics reports, 515(5):227–295,2012.

[5] Z Cheng, PL Garrido, JL Lebowitz, and JL Valles. Long-rangecorrelations in stationary nonequilibrium systems with conservativeanisotropic dynamics. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 14(6):507, 1991.

[6] B Derrida, JL Lebowitz, and ER Speer. Large deviation of the den-sity profile in the steady state of the open symmetric simple exclusionprocess. Journal of statistical physics, 107(3-4):599–634, 2002.

13

[7] Pedro L Garrido, Joel L Lebowitz, Christian Maes, and Herbert Spohn.Long-range correlations for conservative dynamics. Physical Review A,42(4):1954, 1990.

[8] PL Garrido and J Marro. Ising models with anisotropic interactions:Stationary nonequilibrium states with a nonuniform temperature pro-file. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 144(2):585–603, 1987.

[9] RJ Glauber. Time-dependent statistics of the ising model. Journal ofMathematical Physics, 4(2):294–307, 1963.

[10] XL Huang, B Cui, and XX Yi. Entropy and specific heat for opensystems in steady states. Modern Physics Letters B, 25(03):175–183,2011.

[11] Ernst Ising. Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift furPhysik A Hadrons and Nuclei, 31(1):253–258, 1925.

[12] Boualem Khouider and Andrew J Majda. A simple multicloud pa-rameterization for convectively coupled tropical waves. part i: Linearanalysis. Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 63(4):1308–1323, 2006.

[13] Georgy Lebon, David Jou, and Jose Casas-Vazquez. Understandingnon-equilibrium thermodynamics: foundations, applications, frontiers.Springer, 2008.

[14] Christian Maes and Frank Redig. Anisotropic perturbations of thesimple symmetric exclusion process: long range correlations. Journalde Physique I, 1(5):669–684, 1991.

[15] Andrew J Majda and Boualem Khouider. Stochastic and mesoscopicmodels for tropical convection. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences, 99(3):1123–1128, 2002.

[16] Barry M McCoy and Tai Tsun Wu. {The Two-Dimensional IsingModel}. 1973.

[17] Martin Mihelich, Berengere Dubrulle, Didier Paillard, and CorentinHerbert. Maximum entropy production vs. kolmogorov-sinai entropyin a constrained asep model. Entropy, 16(2):1037–1046, 2014.

[18] Martin Mihelich, Berengere Dubrulle, Didier Paillard, Corentin Her-bert, and Davide Faranda. Towards an understanding of the maximumentropy production principle in climate toy models. In EGU GeneralAssembly Conference Abstracts, volume 16, page 15060, 2014.

[19] L Onsager. Nuovo cimento, 6. Suppl, 2:249, 1949.

14

[20] Lars Onsager. Crystal statistics. i. a two-dimensional model with anorder-disorder transition. Physical Review, 65(3-4):117, 1944.

[21] Oscar A Pinto, Federico Roma, and Sebastian Bustingorry. Criticalbehavior and out-of-equilibrium dynamics of a two-dimensional isingmodel with dynamic couplings. The European Physical Journal B,87(12):1–10, 2014.

[22] Michel Pleimling, B Schmittmann, and RKP Zia. Convection cells in-duced by spontaneous symmetry breaking. EPL (Europhysics Letters),89(5):50001, 2010.

[23] Eigil Luxhøj Præstgaard, B Schmittmann, and RKP Zia. A lattice gascoupled to two thermal reservoirs: Monte carlo and field theoretic stud-ies. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and ComplexSystems, 18(4):675–695, 2000.

[24] Simon Thalabard, Brice Saint-Michel, Eric Herbert, Franois Daviaud,and Brengre Dubrulle. A statistical mechanics framework for the large-scale structure of turbulent von krmn flows. New Journal of Physics,17(6):063006, 2015.

15