2
A novel catalyst for hydrazine decomposition: molybdenum carbide supported on g-Al 2 O 3 Xiaowei Chen, Tao Zhang,* Pinliang Ying, Mingyuan Zheng, Weicheng Wu, Liangen Xia, Tao Li, Xiaodong Wang and Can Li* State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 110, Dalian 116023, China. E-mail: [email protected]. E-mail: [email protected] Received (in Cambridge, UK) 16th October 2001, Accepted 17th December 2001 First published as an Advance Article on the web 16th January 2002 An alumina-supported Mo 2 C catalyst is found to be as active as a conventionally used Ir/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst for catalytic decomposition of hydrazine tested in a monopropellant thruster. The catalytic decomposition of hydrazine has been of interest for many years since this process has been successfully used in a monopropellant thruster to control and adjust the orbits and altitudes of spacecrafts. The traditionally used catalyst for hydrazine decomposition is a 20–40 wt% Ir/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst. 1-4 The Ir-based catalyst is very expensive because iridium is a rare and noble metal. Therefore it is highly desirable to develop an inexpensive, active, stable and readily available catalyst for hydrazine decomposition. Transition metal carbides and nitrides have received a great deal of attention because of their excellent catalytic behavior resembling group VIII metals in a number of reactions, 5,6 such as hydrogenolysis, hydrogenation, hydrotreating (hydrode- nitrogenation and hydrodesulfurization), NH 3 synthesis and decomposition. Pure phases of g-Mo 2 N, W 2 N, NbN and W 2 C have been tested as possible substitutes for the Ir/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst for hydrazine decomposition in space technology. 7,8 Their behaviors were similar to or inferior to that of the Ir/g- Al 2 O 3 catalyst. Until now, no studies on the catalytic performance of molybdenum carbide for hydrazine decomposition have been reported. Supported Mo 2 C on alumina catalysts were prepared in order to obtain highly dispersed molybdenum carbide on the alumina with a high surface area. Compared with the bulk molybdenum carbide, alumina-supported molybdenum carbide has some advantages, such as relatively low Mo loading, large surface area, strong mechanical strength and easy molding. In this work, for the first time it has been found that the supported Mo 2 C catalysts are very active for hydrazine decomposition. The theoretical monolayer capacity of the MoO 3 /g-Al 2 O 3 sample is 0.12 g MoO 3 /100 m 2 of g-Al 2 O 3 surface. 9 The theoretical monolayer coverage of MoO 3 on g-Al 2 O 3 with 198 m 2 g 21 corresponds to a loading of ca. 12.9 wt% Mo. The MoO 3 /g-Al 2 O 3 precursor (Mo in the catalyst is 12.9 wt%) was first prepared by the incipient wetness method using an aqueous (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 ·4H 2 O solution and g-Al 2 O 3 (S BET = 198 m 2 g 21 , 20–30 mesh), followed by drying at 393 K for 12 h and calcination at 773 K for 4 h. The Mo 2 N/g-Al 2 O 3 precursor was prepared by temperature-programmed reaction (TPR) of MoO 3 / g-Al 2 O 3 with ammonia. The temperature was increased from room temperature to 573 K in 1 h; then from 573 K to 973 K at a rate of 1 K min 21 ; and then kept at 973 K for 2 h. The nitrided sample was cooled down to room temperature in flowing ammonia and passivated in a mixture of 1% O 2 /N 2 so as to avoid the violent oxidation of the Mo 2 N/g-Al 2 O 3 precursor. Sup- ported molybdenum carbides with the same Mo loading but different structures were prepared by TPR between the precursors (Mo 2 N/g-Al 2 O 3 or MoO 3 /g-Al 2 O 3 ) and 20% CH 4 / H 2 (v/v). A four-stage heating ramp was used: the temperature was first heated from room temperature to 573 K in 0.5 h; then to 823 K at a rate of 0.5 K min 21 ; further from 823 to 973 K at a rate of 1 K min 21 ; and finally maintained at 973 K for 1 h. The a-Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst with a face-centered cubic structure (fcc) was prepared by carburizing the produced Mo 2 N/g-Al 2 O 3 , whereas the b-Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst with a hexagonal-close packed structure (hcp) was synthesized from MoO 3 /g-Al 2 O 3 directly. 10–13 Both of the supported Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalysts with different structures were passivated by 1% O 2 /N 2 for 10 h to form a protective oxide layer on the surface. The catalytic activity of hydrazine decomposition was evaluated in an experimental apparatus similar to that used by Tian et al. 14 and Rodrigues. 7,8 A monopropellant thruster of 10 Newtons containing a catalyst bed (40 mm long with a diameter of 16 mm), was placed in a vacuum chamber (evacuated to 0.5 Torr). In this thruster the theoretical chamber pressure (P c ) produced by hydrazine decomposition was ca. 1.02–1.05 MPa (at flow rate of hydrazine of 4.41 g s 21 ). Approximately 9 g of catalyst was used for each batch. The hydrazine injection pressure (P i ) was controlled by pressurized N 2 and was kept constant (1.5 MPa) during the hydrazine decomposition to obtain an almost constant hydrazine feeding rate. When the electromagnetic valve was opened, the hydrazine was pressed into the catalytic chamber by N 2 . Almost at the same time, the hydrazine was vaporized and decomposed by the catalyst bed, generating the gases of nitrogen, hydrogen and ammonia. The initial temperature in the catalyst bed was 373 K. The continuous feeding of hydrazine lasted 30 s, and then the catalyst bed was allowed to cool to 373 K before the next 30 s test began. Chamber pressure (P c ), catalyst bed temperature (T c ) and ignition delay (t 0 ) were recorded with a frequency of 1 kHz and calculated automatically by computer. The performance of hydrazine decomposition over the Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalysts with different structures and commercial 31.6 wt% Ir/g-Al 2 O 3 catalysts were compared. The Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalysts (12.9 wt% Mo) prepared by different methods both show broad XRD peaks which make it difficult to distinguish the Mo 2 C phase from g-Al 2 O 3 . However, the bulk materials synthesized under similar preparation conditions give strong and sharp XRD peaks due to a-Mo 2 C (fcc) and b-Mo 2 C (hcp) phases. These results suggest that the a- Mo 2 C and b-Mo 2 C particles are well dispersed on g-Al 2 O 3 under these preparation conditions. Hydrazine decomposition is a volume expansion and exo- thermic reaction. When hydrazine was fed into the thruster and contacted with the catalyst, it was decomposed immediately. Consequently, the chamber pressure (P c ) increases quickly, and then reaches a maximum value. Fig. 1 compares the catalytic behaviors of the commercial 31.6 wt% Ir/g-Al 2 O 3 , a-Mo 2 C/g- Al 2 O 3 and b-Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalysts in the first 30 s con- tinuous feeding of hydrazine. It can be seen that P c attains a steady value within a short time. The higher the catalyst activity, the more rapid the increase of the chamber pressure. These results indicate that both the a-Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 and b-Mo 2 C/g- Al 2 O 3 catalysts are effective for the catalytic decomposition of hydrazine. Furthermore, there is no obvious difference between the stable-state chamber pressures of the Mo 2 C/g-Al 2 O 3 catalysts with different structures and the Ir/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst under the same reaction conditions. The steady P c produced by hydrazine decomposition is close to or greater than the This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2002 288 CHEM. COMMUN. , 2002, 288–289 DOI: 10.1039/b109400a

A novel catalyst for hydrazine decomposition: molybdenum carbide supported on γ-Al2O3

  • Upload
    can

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A novel catalyst for hydrazine decomposition: molybdenum carbide supported on γ-Al2O3

A novel catalyst for hydrazine decomposition: molybdenum carbidesupported on g-Al2O3

Xiaowei Chen, Tao Zhang,* Pinliang Ying, Mingyuan Zheng, Weicheng Wu, Liangen Xia, Tao Li,Xiaodong Wang and Can Li*State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 110, Dalian 116023, China. E-mail: [email protected]. E-mail: [email protected]

Received (in Cambridge, UK) 16th October 2001, Accepted 17th December 2001First published as an Advance Article on the web 16th January 2002

An alumina-supported Mo2C catalyst is found to be as activeas a conventionally used Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst for catalyticdecomposition of hydrazine tested in a monopropellantthruster.

The catalytic decomposition of hydrazine has been of interestfor many years since this process has been successfully used ina monopropellant thruster to control and adjust the orbits andaltitudes of spacecrafts. The traditionally used catalyst forhydrazine decomposition is a 20–40 wt% Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst.1-4

The Ir-based catalyst is very expensive because iridium is a rareand noble metal. Therefore it is highly desirable to develop aninexpensive, active, stable and readily available catalyst forhydrazine decomposition.

Transition metal carbides and nitrides have received a greatdeal of attention because of their excellent catalytic behaviorresembling group VIII metals in a number of reactions,5,6 suchas hydrogenolysis, hydrogenation, hydrotreating (hydrode-nitrogenation and hydrodesulfurization), NH3 synthesis anddecomposition. Pure phases of g-Mo2N, W2N, NbN and W2Chave been tested as possible substitutes for the Ir/g-Al2O3catalyst for hydrazine decomposition in space technology.7,8

Their behaviors were similar to or inferior to that of the Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst.

Until now, no studies on the catalytic performance ofmolybdenum carbide for hydrazine decomposition have beenreported. Supported Mo2C on alumina catalysts were preparedin order to obtain highly dispersed molybdenum carbide on thealumina with a high surface area. Compared with the bulkmolybdenum carbide, alumina-supported molybdenum carbidehas some advantages, such as relatively low Mo loading, largesurface area, strong mechanical strength and easy molding. Inthis work, for the first time it has been found that the supportedMo2C catalysts are very active for hydrazine decomposition.

The theoretical monolayer capacity of the MoO3/g-Al2O3sample is 0.12 g MoO3/100 m2 of g-Al2O3 surface.9 Thetheoretical monolayer coverage of MoO3 on g-Al2O3 with 198m2 g21 corresponds to a loading of ca. 12.9 wt% Mo. TheMoO3/g-Al2O3 precursor (Mo in the catalyst is 12.9 wt%) wasfirst prepared by the incipient wetness method using an aqueous(NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O solution and g-Al2O3 (SBET = 198 m2

g21, 20–30 mesh), followed by drying at 393 K for 12 h andcalcination at 773 K for 4 h. The Mo2N/g-Al2O3 precursor wasprepared by temperature-programmed reaction (TPR) of MoO3/g-Al2O3 with ammonia. The temperature was increased fromroom temperature to 573 K in 1 h; then from 573 K to 973 K ata rate of 1 K min21; and then kept at 973 K for 2 h. The nitridedsample was cooled down to room temperature in flowingammonia and passivated in a mixture of 1% O2/N2 so as to avoidthe violent oxidation of the Mo2N/g-Al2O3 precursor. Sup-ported molybdenum carbides with the same Mo loading butdifferent structures were prepared by TPR between theprecursors (Mo2N/g-Al2O3 or MoO3/g-Al2O3) and 20% CH4/H2 (v/v). A four-stage heating ramp was used: the temperaturewas first heated from room temperature to 573 K in 0.5 h; thento 823 K at a rate of 0.5 K min21; further from 823 to 973 K ata rate of 1 K min21; and finally maintained at 973 K for 1 h. The

a-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalyst with a face-centered cubic structure(fcc) was prepared by carburizing the produced Mo2N/g-Al2O3,whereas the b-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalyst with a hexagonal-closepacked structure (hcp) was synthesized from MoO3/g-Al2O3directly.10–13 Both of the supported Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalystswith different structures were passivated by 1% O2/N2 for 10 hto form a protective oxide layer on the surface.

The catalytic activity of hydrazine decomposition wasevaluated in an experimental apparatus similar to that used byTian et al.14 and Rodrigues.7,8 A monopropellant thruster of 10Newtons containing a catalyst bed (40 mm long with a diameterof 16 mm), was placed in a vacuum chamber (evacuated to 0.5Torr). In this thruster the theoretical chamber pressure (Pc)produced by hydrazine decomposition was ca. 1.02–1.05 MPa(at flow rate of hydrazine of 4.41 g s21). Approximately 9 g ofcatalyst was used for each batch. The hydrazine injectionpressure (Pi) was controlled by pressurized N2 and was keptconstant (1.5 MPa) during the hydrazine decomposition toobtain an almost constant hydrazine feeding rate. When theelectromagnetic valve was opened, the hydrazine was pressedinto the catalytic chamber by N2. Almost at the same time, thehydrazine was vaporized and decomposed by the catalyst bed,generating the gases of nitrogen, hydrogen and ammonia. Theinitial temperature in the catalyst bed was 373 K. Thecontinuous feeding of hydrazine lasted 30 s, and then thecatalyst bed was allowed to cool to 373 K before the next 30 stest began. Chamber pressure (Pc), catalyst bed temperature (Tc)and ignition delay (t0) were recorded with a frequency of 1 kHzand calculated automatically by computer. The performance ofhydrazine decomposition over the Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts withdifferent structures and commercial 31.6 wt% Ir/g-Al2O3catalysts were compared.

The Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts (12.9 wt% Mo) prepared bydifferent methods both show broad XRD peaks which make itdifficult to distinguish the Mo2C phase from g-Al2O3. However,the bulk materials synthesized under similar preparationconditions give strong and sharp XRD peaks due to a-Mo2C(fcc) and b-Mo2C (hcp) phases. These results suggest that the a-Mo2C and b-Mo2C particles are well dispersed on g-Al2O3under these preparation conditions.

Hydrazine decomposition is a volume expansion and exo-thermic reaction. When hydrazine was fed into the thruster andcontacted with the catalyst, it was decomposed immediately.Consequently, the chamber pressure (Pc) increases quickly, andthen reaches a maximum value. Fig. 1 compares the catalyticbehaviors of the commercial 31.6 wt% Ir/g-Al2O3, a-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 and b-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts in the first 30 s con-tinuous feeding of hydrazine. It can be seen that Pc attains asteady value within a short time. The higher the catalyst activity,the more rapid the increase of the chamber pressure. Theseresults indicate that both the a-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 and b-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts are effective for the catalytic decomposition ofhydrazine. Furthermore, there is no obvious difference betweenthe stable-state chamber pressures of the Mo2C/g-Al2O3catalysts with different structures and the Ir/g-Al2O3 catalystunder the same reaction conditions. The steady Pc produced byhydrazine decomposition is close to or greater than the

Th is journa l i s © The Roya l Soc ie ty of Chemist ry 2002288 CHEM. COMMUN. , 2002, 288–289

DO

I: 10

.103

9/b

1094

00a

Publ

ishe

d on

16

Janu

ary

2002

. Dow

nloa

ded

by N

orth

Car

olin

a St

ate

Uni

vers

ity o

n 24

/08/

2013

10:

22:4

5.

View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue

Page 2: A novel catalyst for hydrazine decomposition: molybdenum carbide supported on γ-Al2O3

theoretical Pc. The activities of supported molybdenum carbidecatalysts for hydrazine decomposition are comparable to that ofthe Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst.

Table 1 summarizes the experimental results of steadychamber pressure (Pc), catalyst bed temperature (Tc) andignition delay (t0). The parameter t0 is the time when thepressure of the chamber reaches 10% of the stable-state pressureof the chamber. It reflects the initial activity of the catalyst and

depends mainly upon the intrinsic activity of the catalyst at theinitial time. The smaller the values of t0, the higher the initialactivity of the catalyst. The t0 value of the Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst isthe shortest with an average of 28 ms, whereas the t0 values ofthe a-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 and b-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts are longerthan that of the Ir-based catalyst with the average of 56 and 46ms, respectively. The results indicate that the initial activity ofthe Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst is higher than that of the Mo2C/g-Al2O3catalysts, but is within the same order of magnitude. Thedifference in the t0 value of these two Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalystsof the same chemical composition is small and is probably dueto their different phases.

The chamber pressure (Pc) and catalyst bed temperature (Tc)at the steady states remains almost unchanged for six tests of the30 s continuous feeding of hydrazine. This indicates that thesetwo Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts are stable for hydrazine decom-position.

The ammonia component of the resultant mixture producedby hydrazine decomposition may further dissociate into H2 andN2 at elevated temperatures. The ammonia decomposition isendothermic and the hydrazine decomposition is exothermic.Hence the catalyst bed temperature (Tc) is the parameter of theammonia and hydrazine conversion. As shown in Fig. 1, Tcincreases when hydrazine decomposes, and rises to a stablelevel finally. The Tc of the Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst is lower thanthose of the Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts with different phases. Theresults suggest that the ammonia conversion over the Ir/g-Al2O3catalyst is higher than that of the Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts.

In conclusion, alumina-supported molybdenum carbideshave been applied to hydrazine decomposition for the first time.The Mo2C/g-Al2O3 catalysts exhibit excellent catalytic per-formances for hydrazine decomposition. They show compara-ble activities to that of the Ir/g-Al2O3 catalyst. Alumina-supported molybdenum carbide catalysts are thereforepromising substitutes for the Ir-based catalyst for hydrazinedecomposition in space technology because of their low cost,high activity, strong mechanical strength and easy prepara-tion.

Notes and references1 W. E. Armstrong, L. B. Ryland and H. H. Voge, US Pat., 4,124,538,

1978.2 J. P. Contour and G. Pannetier, J. Catal., 1972, 24, 434.3 S. Mary, C. Kappenstein, S. Balcon, S. Rossignol and E. Gengembre,

Appl. Catal., A: General, 1999, 182, 317.4 S. Balcon, S. Mary, C. Kappenstein and E. Gengembre, Appl. Catal., A:

General, 2000, 196, 179.5 S. T. Oyama, Catal. Today, 1992, 15, 179.6 J.-G. Choi, J. R. Brenner, C. W. Colling, B. G. Demczyk, J. L. Dunning

and L. T. Thompson, Catal. Today, 1992, 15, 201.7 R. Brayner, G. Djéga-Mariadassou, G. M. Cruz and J. A. J. Rodrigues,

Catal. Today, 2000, 57, 225.8 J. A. J. Rodrigues, G. M. Cruz, G. Bugli, M. Boudart and G. Djéga-

Mariadassou, Catal. Lett., 1997, 45, 1.9 Y. Xie and Y. Tang, Adv. Catal., 1990, 37, 1.

10 J. S. Lee, K. H. Lee and J. Y. Lee, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 362; J. S.Lee, M. H. Yeom, K. Y. Park, I.-S. Nam, J. S. Chung, Y. G. Kim and S.H. Moon, J. Catal., 1991, 128, 126.

11 M. Nagai, K. Oshikawa, T. Kurakami, T. Miyao and S. Omi, J. Catal.,1998, 180, 14; M. Nagai, T. Kurakami and S. Omi, Catal. Today, 1998,45, 235.

12 P. A. Aegerter, W. W. C. Quigley, G. J. Simpson, D. D. Ziegler, J. W.Logan, K. R. McCrea, S. Glazier and M. E. Bussell, J. Catal., 1996, 164,109.

13 A. J. Brungs, A. P. E. York, J. B. Claridge, C. Márquez-Alvarez and M.L. H. Green, Catal. Lett., 2000, 70, 117.

14 H. Tian, T. Zhang, X. Sun, D. Liang and L. Lin, Appl. Catal., A:General, 2001, 210, 55.

Fig. 1 Comparison of catalytic performance of hydrazine decompositionover (a) Ir/g-Al2O3, (b) a-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 (fcc) and (c) b-Mo2C/g-Al2O3

(hcp) catalysts with a continuous feeding of hydrazine for 30 s in a thrusterof 10 N. The initial temperature of the catalyst bed was 373 K.

Table 1 Performance of the catalysts with a continuous feeding of hydrazinefor 30 s in a thruster of 10 N. The initial temperature in the catalyst bed was373 K

Catalyst

Hydrazineflowrate/g s21

Averaget0/ms Tc/K

Pc/MPa

a-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 (fcc) 4.70 56 1171 1.08b-Mo2C/g-Al2O3 (hcp) 4.42 46 1123 1.04Ir/g-Al2O3 4.63 28 1071 1.07

Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Limited, Cambridge, England

289CHEM. COMMUN. , 2002, 288–289

Publ

ishe

d on

16

Janu

ary

2002

. Dow

nloa

ded

by N

orth

Car

olin

a St

ate

Uni

vers

ity o

n 24

/08/

2013

10:

22:4

5.

View Article Online