28
313 台中大坑地區地下水資源調查及分佈之研究 黃育珍 (1) 鄭皆達 (2) 黃晴曉 (3) 陳本康 (4) 台中大坑地區因地質上砂頁岩互層之地質構造,表面風化嚴重,遇雨常造成大小規模不一 之崩塌情形。部分地區甚至因地下水豐沛之原因,經主管機關調查後劃設為潛在地滑區。 為減低因為高地下水位造成之崩塌危險,本研究評估將移除多餘之地下水源並引導至下邊 坡以作改善農業用水。 本研究蒐集 5 處示範區之地形、地層及地質資料並利用包括地質鑽探、地電阻地球物理探 測及現場調查等以瞭解五處調查區地下水源利用之可行性。 根據調查結果,在五處示範區中,3 處地點(第一、第二及第四示範區)其地形及地質條件 具有蘊藏地下水資源之可行性。 (關鍵詞:地下水、湧水、地電阻) 1 A Study of groundwater investigation and distribution assessment in Taichung Da-Keng area Huang-Yu Chen (1) Jack D. Cheng (2) Ging-Xiao Huang (3) Ben Kang Chen (4) Doctoral Graduate Student (1), (2) Professor (4) Doctor Department of Soil and Water Conservation National Chung-Hsing University, Taiwan, R.O.C. Director (3) General of Economic development Burreau Taichung city government. ABSTRACT In Dakeng area of Taichung City, geological structure and surface weathering often cause landslides of varying sizes during heavy rainfall periods. Some locations in Dakeng were designated by responsible authorities as potential landslide sites area due to abundant groundwater. To reduce the danger of landslide occurrence due to high groundwater, this study (1)國立中興大學水土保持學系博士班研究生 (通訊作者 email:[email protected]) (2)國立中興大學水土保持學系教授 (3)臺中市政府經濟發展局局長 (4)國立中興大學水土保持學系博士

台中大坑地區地下水資源調查及分佈之研究A Study of groundwater

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 313

    (1) (2) (3) (4)

    5

    3 ()

    () 1

    A Study of groundwater investigation and distribution assessment in Taichung Da-Keng area

    Huang-Yu Chen(1) Jack D. Cheng(2) Ging-Xiao Huang(3) Ben Kang Chen(4)

    Doctoral Graduate Student (1), (2) Professor (4) Doctor Department of Soil and Water Conservation National Chung-Hsing University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Director(3) General of Economic development Burreau Taichung city government.

    ABSTRACT

    In Dakeng area of Taichung City, geological structure and surface weathering often cause landslides of varying sizes during heavy rainfall periods. Some locations in Dakeng were designated by responsible authorities as potential landslide sites area due to abundant groundwater.

    To reduce the danger of landslide occurrence due to high groundwater, this study (1) ( email:[email protected]) (2) (3) (4)

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    314

    assessed the suitabilities of removing extra water in the ground for use elsewhere downslope to improve agriculture water supply in this area.

    This study collect terrain, landform and geological data at 5 study sites in the Dakeng area. Geological logging, resistance physical detection and field check were used to investigate the suitabilities of these 5 sites. The results show that among these 5 sites, 3(#1, #2, #4) were suitable because their geological and topographical conditions are favorable to high groundwater storage.

    (Keywordsgroundwater, drainage, Resistivity Imaging).

    1.

    129 ()

    ( 1)

    2.

    200~300

    34.48%( 1

  • 315

    2 )

    36.72%( 2

    3 )

    19.01 % ( 3

    4 )

    1

    Figure 1 The location of Da-Keng area (Taichung)

    4

    (EL)

    Value

    High : 831.175

    Low : 138

    0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Millimeters

    2

    Figure 2 Elevation distribution map in Da-Keng area (Taichung)

    4

    0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Millimeters

    3

    Figure 3 Slope distribution map in Da-Keng area (Taichung)

    1

    Table 1 Elevation distribution of the study area

    ()

    ()

    (%)

    113 - 200 465 12.84 200 - 300 1,249 34.48 300 - 400 1,019 28.13 400 - 500 503 13.88 500 - 600 190 5.24 600 - 700 126 3.49 700 - 800 68 1.86 800 - 900 3 0.08 3,624 100.00

    2

    Table 2 Slope distribution of the study area

    ()

    (%) 267.69 7.39 550.42 15.19 1,330.78 36.72 773.95 21.36 522.42 14.42 178.57 4.93 0.16 0.00 3,624.00 100.00

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    316

    4

    0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Millimeters

    -clip

    flat N NE E SE S SW W NW

    N

    4

    Figure 4 Aspect distribution map in Da-Keng area (Taichung)

    3

    Table 3 Aspect distribution of the study area

    ()

    (%) 14.56 0.40 175.05 4.83

    187.53 5.17 218.41 6.03

    440.50 12.16 688.99 19.01

    634.27 17.50 529.78 14.62

    505.94 13.96 228.97 6.32

    3,624.00 100.00

    129

    ( 5 )

    3.

    6

    10-50

    50 2-3

    (trough cross-bed)

  • 317

    500

    4

    0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Millimeters

    5

    Figure 5 Creek location in Da-Keng area (Taichung)

    (PQs)

    (PQc)

    (P1)

    (Q3)

    (Q6)

    (Q6)

    (Q6)(Q6)

    (Q6)

    (P2)(P2)

    (P2)

    (P2)(P2)

    (Ms)

    4

    -clip

    0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Millimeters

    6

    Figure 6 Regional geology map in Da-Keng area (Taichung)

    4.

    4

    5.

    1955.8 mm

    147

    1998 ~2008

    5

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    318

    4

    Table 4 Distribution and characteristics of the fault in study area

    5 1998 ~2008 Table 5 Monthly Rainfall in Taichung precipitation station (1998~2008)

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    (mm)

    1 123 16 24 82 29 28 20 18 29 57 15 40.1 2.05% 2 373 3 226 4 3 19 78 155 22 25 38 86.0 4.40% 3 177 63 37 39 20 36 85 228 93 88 34 81.8 4.18% 4 202 38 331 202 4 153 131 47 222 136 31 136.1 6.96% 5 145 272 26 271 271 101 164 620 316 169 332 244.3 12.49% 6 526 206 238 226 199 298 77 566 755 735 183 364.5 18.63% 7 62 369 369 347 356 118 1025 378 329 62 908 393.0 20.09% 8 288 303 381 225 154 171 467 351 117 516 51 274.9 14.06% 9 107 72 17 565 198 7 156 161 144 316 830 233.9 11.96% 10 129 9 53 6 12 0 9 29 0 290 21 50.7 2.59% 11 2 4 24 3 5 1 0 6 96 23 24 17.1 0.87% 12 43 36 70 13 65 0 49 15 49 17 11 33.5 1.71% (mm) 2177 1391 1796 1983 1316 932 2261 2574 2172 2434 2478 1955.8 100.0%

    6.

    (

    3 121m

    7) 921

    1999-2001 3

    2002~2009

    85.33 2008

    5 3 2008 10 6

    8

  • 319

    7

    Figure 7 Location of Dong-San groundwater Observatory

    8 2002 ~2009

    Figure 8 Groundwater table observation curve (2002~2009)

    ()

    (Ground Water)

    (Zone

    of aeration) (Zone of

    saturation)

    (Water

    table) 9

    9 (

    2011)

    Figure 9 Schematic strata profile of groundwater

    () )

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    320

    1.

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    N10~60E/20~30S

    () ~ () 10

    2.

  • 321

    ( 11 )

    10

    Figure 10 The relationship of Groundwater drainage position and Regional geology

    distribution

    11

    Figure 11 The relationship of Groundwater drainage position and terrain

    3.

    (

    )

    12

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    322

    4.

    86

    26

    26

    ( 7

    )

    5.

    12

    Figure 12 The relationship of Groundwater drainage position and geomorphology

  • 323

    6.

    2 7

    13 8

    1.

    2.

    (smart-RP)

    50mm

    3

    9 14

    3.

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    324

    7

    Table 7 Lanslide type and mechanism of potiential landslide zone in study area

    01 1. 2. 3.

    14 1. 2. 3.

    02 1. 2. 3.

    15 1. 2. 3.

    03 1.2. 16

    1. 2. 3.

    04 1.2. 17

    1. 2. 3.

    05 1. 2.3.

    18 1. 2. 3.

    06 1.2. 3.

    19 1. 2.3.

    07 1. 2. 3.

    20 1. 2.3.

    08 1. 2. 3.

    21 1. 2.3.

    09 1. 2. 22 1. 2.

    10 1. 2. 23

    1. 2. 3.

    11 1. 2.3.

    24 1. 2. 3.

    12 1. 2. 25 1. 2.

    13 1. 2. 26

    1.2. 3.

  • 325

    13

    Figure 13 Location of study site

    8 Table 8 The property of study site

    (m)

    1 7

    Tks

    520

    2 ---

    Tks

    0

    3 2 Cl

    240

    4 Cl

    0

    5

    Tks

    307

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    326

    9

    Table 9 The coordinate of precipitation station in study area

    N E 1 223502 26770002 224730 26739143 227074 2677473

    14

    Figure 14 Location of precipitation station in study area

    4.

    10

    5.

    1.

    (

    12)

    12

    (99 9 4 99 10

    2 99 11 3 )

    ()

    3 11

    9 4 80.2 /

    10 2 30 / 11

    3 5 /

  • 327

    10 Table 10 Geological Investigation in study site (#1~#5)

    AH-1 10m

    Ra=150m AH-2 20m AH-3 10m 1 AH-4 20m 1 AH-5 5m

    BH-1 30m 1 Rb1=100m Rb2=50m BH-2 20m

    BH-3 15m

    CH-1 30m

    Rc1=100m Rc2=100m

    CH-2 20m 1 2 CH-3 20m CH-4 10m CH-5 10m CH-6 10m CH-7 10m

    DH-1 30m Rd=150m

    DH-2 30m 1 -

    - Re1=50m Re2=100m

    12 300m 1 4 2 800m

    ()

    10 2 11 3

    ()

    9 11 11

    ()

    11 80~100 /

    ()

    11 3

    3 /

    ()

    9

    11

    ()

    11

    2.

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    328

    3.6~13.0m

    ()

    ()

    11

    BH-1 BH-2

    1.5m

    0.428-1.0710-6

    7 26-28 8

    25 ( 12)

    CH-1 CH-2

    ()

    3.0m 3.3m

    02

    GL-2.4m GL-0.0m

    13

    DH-1 1.0~10.1m

    DH-2 1.7~13.6m 17.7~23.5m

    7 26-28 8

    25 ( 14)

    (3.67-7.8210-6)

    14

    11

    Table 11 The underground water observe record (study site #1) AH-1 AH-2 AH-3 AH-4 AH-5 448m 451m 453m 456m 10m 20m 10m 20m 5m

    (5/8)

    (

    80.2 /)

    (5/24) (6/9) (6/24) (7/8) GL-0.6m (7/25) GL-0.8m (8/10) GL-0.55m (9/2) GL-0.3m GL-0.5m (9/26) GL-0.5m GL-0.5m GL-0.8m (10/26) GL-0.25m GL-6.9m GL-6.45m GL-1.0m

  • 329

    12

    Table 12 The underground water observe record (study site #2) BH-1 BH-2 BH-3 438m 435m 424m 30m 20m 15m

    (6/9) GL-5.3m GL-5.7m GL-5.1m (6/24) GL-5.4m GL-5.6m GL-5.3m (7/8) GL-5.1m GL-4.9m GL-5.1m (7/25) GL-4.8m GL-5.2m GL-4.9m (8/10) GL-3.2m GL-3.8m GL-4.75m (9/2) GL-0.45m GL-0.45m GL-4.7m (9/26) GL-0.4m GL-0.5m GL-5.15m (10/26) GL-0.35m GL-0.75m GL-5.75m

    13

    Table 13 The underground water observe record (study site #3) CH-1 CH-2 CH-3 CH-4 CH-5 CH-6 CH-7 196m 242m 232m 30m 20m 20m 10m 10m 10m 10m

    (4/7) GL-1.4m GL-1.7m

    CH-4~CH-7 (CH-4 19.2 /CH-5CH-6 CH-7 0 /)

    (4/25) GL-1.5m GL-1.9m (5/8) GL-1.2m GL-2.4m (5/24) GL-0.7m GL-1.4m (6/9) GL-0.7m GL-1.8m (6/24) GL-0.8m GL-1.6m (7/8) GL-0.7m GL-2.0m (7/25) GL-0.5m GL-1.4m (8/10) GL-1.3m (9/2) GL-1.3m GL-7.65m (9/26) GL-1.25m GL-8.4m

    (10/26) GL-1.4m GL-8.65m

    14

    Table 14 The underground water observe record (study site #4)

    DH-1 DH-2 508m 502m 30m 30m

    (7/8) GL-9.8m GL-10.1m

    (7/25) GL-7.9m GL-9.5m

    (8/10) GL-7.5m GL-8.8m (9/2)

    (9/26)

    (10/26) GL-0.3m

    3.

    15 AH-2AH-3

    7 27 8 24

    9 8 ~9 26

    6

    24 ~7 12

    18 9

    8 18

    AH-2AH-3

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    330

    7 27 8

    24

    6

    24 ~7 12

    16

    ()

    17

    7 27

    8

    10

    7 25 ~8 10

    7 27

    8 10 ~8 16 (

    44.5mm )

    ()

    18

    7 27

    (118mm)

    8 10

    1~2m

    15

    Figure 15 The relationship of Groundwater variation and precipitation (study site #1)

    16

    Figure 16 The relationship of Groundwater variation and precipitation (study site #2)

  • 331

    17

    Figure 17 The relationship of Groundwater variation and precipitation (study site #3)

    18

    Figure 18 The relationship of Groundwater variation and precipitation (study site #4)

    4.

    17 300

    5

    45

    ( 15)

    4

    AH-1~AH-4 ( 19)

    60M

    AH-5 ( 5M)

    AH-1~AH-4

    19

    Figure 19 Location of logging and Geophysics explore line (study site #1)

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    332

    15

    Table 15 Geological logging record in study site #1

    AH-1 10m 0.0~0.4m 0.4~4.3m 4.3~10.0m

    AH-2 20m 0.0~0.6m 0.6~1.5m 1.5~3.8m 3.8~20.0m

    AH-3 10m 0.0~0.6m 0.6~1.2m 1.2~3.6m 3.6~10.0m

    AH-4 20m 0.0~13.0m 13.0~20.0m

    AH-5 5m

    AH-4 AH-1AH-2AH-3 AH-5 100m

    16

    Table 16 Geological logging record in study site #2

    (

    )

    BH-1 30m 0.0~1.5m 1.5~30.0m BH-2 20m 0.0~1.5m 1.5~20.0m BH-3 15m 0.0~0.5m 0.5~3.8m 3.8~1.5m

    BH-3 BH-1BH-2 150m

    17

    Table 17 Geological logging record in study site #3

    ()

    CH-1 30m 0.0~3.0m 3.0~30.0m ()

    CH-2 20m 0.0~3.3m 3.3~20.0m (3.3~10.0m 10.0~20.0m

    )

    CH-3 20m 0.0~9.7m 9.7~20.0m ()

    CH-4 10m

    CH-5 10m

    CH-6 10m

    CH-7 10m

  • 333

    20

    Figure 20 Location of logging and Geophysics explore line (study site #2)

    21

    Figure 21 Location of logging and Geophysics explore line (study site #3)

    3

    ( 16) BH-1~BH-3 (

    20) 65M 2

    BH-1~BH-3

    (CH-1~CH-3) 70

    CH-4~CH-7

    40M ( 17)

    21

    (DH-1~DH-2) 60

    ( 18)

    22

    5.

    8

    22 40 100

    23

    24

    3~5m

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    334

    22

    Figure 22 Location of logging and Geophysics explore line (study site #4)

    23

    Figure 23 Geology strata profile of study site #1

    24 Ra

    Figure 24 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Ra (study site #1)

    18

    Table 18 Geological logging record in study site #4

    ( )

    DH-1 30m 0.0~1.0m 1.0~30.0m ( 1.0~10.1m 10.1~30.0m )

    DH-2 30m 0.0~1.7m 1.7~20.0m ( 1.7~13.6m 17.7~23.5m 13.6~17.7m 23.5~30.0m )

    2

    Rb1

    2 10

    Rb2

  • 335

    10

    15

    25

    2627

    2~4m

    25

    Figure 25 Geology strata profile of study site #2

    26 Rb1

    Figure 26 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Rb1 (study site #2)

    27 Rb2

    Figure 27 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Rb2 (study site #2)

    2

    Rc1

    8 27

    Rc2

    8

    10

    28

    29

    30

    3~9m

    19.2

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    336

    28

    Figure 28 Geology strata profile of study site #3

    29 Rc1

    Figure 29 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Rc1 (study site #3)

    30 Rc2

    Figure 30 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Rc2 (study site #3)

    6 30

    35 105

    31

    32

    1~2m

    ()

    9 18

    12000

    10 24 6500

    31

    Figure 31 Geology strata profile of study site #4

  • 337

    32 Rd

    Figure 32 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Rd (study site #4)

    2

    3334

    Re1

    7

    25

    33 Re1

    Figure 33 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Re1 (study site #5)

    34 Re2

    Figure 34 Resistivity Imaging Profiling Re2 (study site #5)

    Re2

    5 12

    2~10m (

    )

    ()

    7~9 10

    ()

    1.

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    338

    3.5~4.5

    3m~4m

    520

    ()

    0.7~2.4

    ()

    88

    2.

  • 339

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    (

    )

    () ()

    1. (1986)

    2. (1997)

    29 2

    3. (1998)

    4. (2000)

    -

    5. (2004)

    6. (2005)

    7. (2007)

    8. .(2011)

    9. (2011)

    101 06 06

    101 06 13

    101 06 26

  • 44(4) : 313 340 (2012) Journal of Soil and Water Conservation , 44 (4) : 313 340 (2012)

    340