12
Unexpected formation of [Ru(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )(PH{CH 2 N(CH 2 CH 2 ) 2 O} 2 )(PPh 3 ) 2 ]BF 4 - the first „piano-stool” ruthenium complex bearing secondary aminomethylphosphane ligand Michał Płotek, a,b Radosław Starosta, c * Urszula K. Komarnicka, c Agnieszka Skórska-Stania, a Grażyna Stochel, a Agnieszka Kyzioł a * and Małgorzata Jeżowska-Bojczuk c a Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Ingardena 3, 30-060 Krakow, Poland b Faculty of Conservation and Restoration of Works of Art, Jan Matejko Academy of Fine Arts in Krakow, Lea 27-29, 30-052 Krakow, Poland c Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wroclaw, Joliot-Curie 14, 50-383 Wroclaw, Poland * corresponding authors: AK - [email protected]; RS- [email protected] In this paper we report the reaction of [Ru(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )Cl(PPh 3 ) 2 ] with P{CH 2 N(CH 2 CH 2 ) 2 O} 3 in the presence of NaBF 4 , in which apart from the Clˉ substitution, an unexpected P-C bond cleavage in the tertiary phosphane is observed. It results in formation of the [Ru(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )(PH{CH 2 N(CH 2 CH 2 ) 2 O} 2 )(PPh 3 ) 2 ]BF 4 (1) – the first “piano-stool” ruthenium complex with secondary aminomethylphosphane ligand. Fig. S1 Structure of complex 1 with atom numbering scheme. Fig. S2 Comparison of the 31 P and 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra (CDCl 3 , 300 K) of complex 1. Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014

aminomethylphosphane ligand the first „piano-stool

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Unexpected formation of [Ru(η5-C5H5)(PH{CH2N(CH2CH2)2O}2)(PPh3)2]BF4 -

the first „piano-stool” ruthenium complex bearing secondary aminomethylphosphane ligand

Michał Płotek,a,b Radosław Starosta,c* Urszula K. Komarnicka,c Agnieszka Skórska-Stania,a Grażyna Stochel,a Agnieszka Kyzioła* and Małgorzata Jeżowska-Bojczukc

a Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Ingardena 3, 30-060 Krakow, Polandb Faculty of Conservation and Restoration of Works of Art, Jan Matejko Academy of Fine Arts in Krakow, Lea 27-29, 30-052 Krakow, Polandc Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wroclaw, Joliot-Curie 14, 50-383 Wroclaw, Poland* corresponding authors: AK - [email protected]; RS- [email protected]

In this paper we report the reaction of [Ru(η5-C5H5)Cl(PPh3)2] with P{CH2N(CH2CH2)2O}3 in the presence of NaBF4, in which apart from the Clˉ substitution, an unexpected P-C bond cleavage in the tertiary phosphane is observed. It results in formation of the [Ru(η5-C5H5)(PH{CH2N(CH2CH2)2O}2)(PPh3)2]BF4 (1) – the first “piano-stool” ruthenium complex with secondary aminomethylphosphane ligand.

Fig. S1 Structure of complex 1 with atom numbering scheme.

Fig. S2 Comparison of the 31P and 31P{1H} NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of complex 1.

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014

Fig. S3 31P{1H} NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of reaction mixture (before puryfication and crystallization).

Fig. S4 1H NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of complex 1 (2.1 – 3.8 ppm region).

Fig. S5 1H NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of complex 1 (4.85 – 7.6 ppm region).

Fig. S6 13C{1H} NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of complex 1.

Fig. S7 1H NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of starting complex [Ru(η5-C5H5)Cl(PPh3)2].

Fig. S8 13C{1H} NMR spectra (CDCl3, 300 K) of starting complex [Ru(η5-C5H5)Cl(PPh3)2].

Table S1. Comparison of NMR data for complex 1, PPh3 and starting reagents: [Ru(η5-C5H5)Cl(PPh3)2], P(CH2-morph)3.P(CH2-morph)3 PPh3 [Ru(η5-C5H5)Cl(PPh3)2] 1

Atomic number σ [ppm] multiplicity J [Hz] σ [ppm] multiplicity

J [Hz] σ [ppm] multiplicity J [Hz] σ [ppm] multiplicity

J [Hz]1H NMR

H11 2.59 (2H) d 2J(H11-P1) = 2.1 - - - - 2.94 (4H) mH12 2.50 (4H) m - - - - 2.28 (8H) mH13 3.63 (4H) m - - - - 3.62 (8H) m

H1-H5 - - - - 4.12 (5H) s 4.95 (5H) sH32 - - - - 7.39 (12H) m 6.94 (12H) bt J = 8.6H33 - - - - 7.14 (12H) t J = 7.3 7.33 (12H) t J = 7.2H34 - - - - 7.24 (6H) t J = 7.3 7.45 (6H) t J = 7.2

13C{1H} NMRC11 55.80 d 1J(C1-P1) = 7.8 - - - - 55.97 d 1J(C11-P1) = 36.1C12 54.64 d 3J(C11-P1) = 8.3 - - - - 54.31 d 3J(C12-P1) = 5.5C13 66.45 s - - - - 66.95 s

C1-C5 - - - - 81.39 m 85.42 sC31 - - 137.14 d 1J(C31-P1) = 10.8 138.35 m 136.41 mC32 - - 133.71 d 2J(C32-P1) = 19.8 133.77 t J = 5.0 133.56 bt J = 4.8C33 - - 128.46 d 3J(C33-P1) = 7.1 127.45 t J = 4.5 128.52 bt J = 4.1C34 - - 128.68 s 128.66 s 130.42 s

31P{1H} NMRP1 -61.47 s -4.70 - - - -12.96 t 2J(P1-P2,3) = 41.2

P2, P3 - - - - 38.34 s 42.03 d 2J(P2,3-P1) = 41.231P NMR

P1 -61.47 s - - - - -12.96 d-t 2J(P1-P2,3) = 41.2 1J(P1-H1P) = 338.6

P2, P3 - - - - 38.34 s 42.03 d 2J(P2,3-P1) = 41.2s – singlet, d – doublet, t – triplet, m – multiplet, b - broad

Fig. S9 IR-ATR spectrum of complex 1.

Fig. S10 +ESI mass spectrum of complex 1 (MeOH).

Fig. S11 +ESI mass spectrum of complex 1 (MeOH/HCOOH).

Table S2 Crystal data for complex 1.

Parameters 1

Empirical formula C51H56BF4N2O2P3Ru

Formula weight (g∙mol-1) 1009.77

Temperature (K) 119.8(5)

Type of radiation Mo Kα (0,71073 Å)

Crystal system tetragonal

Space group I41/a

Crystal information

Description block

Colour yellow

Size [mm] 0.28×0.25×0.15

Unit cell dimensions

a (Å) 28.1859(1)

b (Å) 28.1859(1)

c (Å) 23.7177(2)

α (°) 90

β (°) 90

γ (°) 90

Volume (Å3) 18842.4(2)

Z 16

Density calculated (Mg/ m3) 1.424

Absorption coefficient (mm-1) 0.493

F(000) 8352

θmin – θmax (°) 2.86 to 27.50

hkl range

-35 ← h ← 36

-36 ← k ← 36

-30 ← l ← 30

Reflections collected 132166

Independent reflections 10782

Rint 0.0366

Completeness to θmax (%) 99.7

Absorption correction type Multi-scan

Tmax and Tmin 0.915,1.000

Data / restraints / parameters 10782 / 0 / 580

Goodness of fit F2 1.060

R1, wR2 [I>2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0287, wR2 = 0.0670

R1, wR2 (all data) R1 = 0.0374, wR2 = 0.0726

Largest diff. peak and hole (e Å-3) 1.008 and -0.427

Fig. S12 Crystal cell packing of 1 – view along a axis.

Fig. S13 Crystal cell packing of 1 – view along b axis.

Fig. S14 Crystal cell packing of 1 – view along c axis.