12
CS332 Visual Processing Department of Computer Science Wellesley College Analysis of Motion Measuring motion in biological vision systems

Analysis of Motion

  • Upload
    lynda

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Analysis of Motion. Measuring motion in biological vision systems. Smoothness assumption:. Compute a velocity field that: is consistent with local measurements of image motion (perpendicular components) has the least amount of variation possible. Computing the smoothest velocity field. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Analysis of Motion

CS332 Visual ProcessingDepartment of Computer ScienceWellesley College

Analysis of Motion

Measuring motion in biological vision

systems

Page 2: Analysis of Motion

1-2

Smoothness assumption:

Compute a velocity field that:

(1)is consistent with local measurements of image motion (perpendicular components)

(2)has the least amount of variation possible

Page 3: Analysis of Motion

1-3

Computing the smoothest velocity field

(Vxi-1, Vyi-1)

(Vxi, Vyi)

(Vxi+1, Vyi+1)ii+1

i-1

motion components:

Vxiuxi + Vyi uyi= vi

change in velocity:

(Vxi+1-Vxi, Vyi+1-Vyi)

Find (Vxi, Vyi) that minimize:

Σ(Vxiuxi + Vyiuyi - v

i)2 + [(Vxi+1-Vxi)

2 + (Vyi+1-

Vyi)2]

Page 4: Analysis of Motion

1-4

When is the smoothest velocity field correct?

When is it wrong?

motion illusions

Page 5: Analysis of Motion

1-5

Two-stage motion measurement

motion components 2D image motion

Movshon, Adelson, Gizzi & NewsomeV1: high % of cells selective for direction of motion (especially in layer that projects to MT)

MT: high % of cells selective for direction and speed of motion

lesions in MT behavioral deficits in motion tasks

Page 6: Analysis of Motion

1-6

Testing with sine-wave “plaids”

moving plaid

Movshon et al. recorded responses of neurons in area MT to moving plaids with different component gratings

Page 7: Analysis of Motion

1-7

The logic behind the experiments…

Component cells measure perpendicular components of motion

e.g. selective for vertical features moving right

predicted responses: (1) (2) (3)

Pattern cells integrate motion components

e.g. selective for rightward motion of pattern

predicted responses: (1) (2) (3)

(1) (2) (3)

Page 8: Analysis of Motion

1-8

Movshon et al. observations:

Cortical area V1:

all neurons behaved like component cells

Cortical area MT:

layers 4 & 6: component cells

layers 2, 3, 5: pattern cells

Perceptually, two components are not integrated if:

large difference in spatial frequency

large difference in speed

components have different stereo disparity

Evidence for two-stage motion measurement!

Page 9: Analysis of Motion

1-9

Integrating motion over the image

integration along contours vs. over 2D areas:

Nakayama & Silverman

true motio

n perceived motion

contour features can be far away

area features must be

close

Page 10: Analysis of Motion

1-10

Recovering 3D structure from motion

Page 11: Analysis of Motion

1-11

Ambiguity of 3D recovery

birds’ eye views

We need additional constraint to recover 3D

structure uniquely“rigidity constraint”

Page 12: Analysis of Motion

1-12

Image projections

Z

X

perspective projection

image

plane

Z

X

orthographic projection

image plane

(X, Y, Z) (X, Y)

3D 2D(X, Y, Z) (X/Z, Y/Z)

3D 2D