Upload
cathleen-logan
View
221
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ANG 6930Proseminar in
Anthropology IIA: Bioanthropology
Day 2ANG 6930
Prof. Connie J. MulliganDepartment of Anthropology
This week
Science and Evolution Reading
The Human Species, Chpt 1(pp 12-29) and Chpt 4 Course packet
Park MA. 2005. Biological Anthropology, An Introductory Reader, Chpt 9 (pp 40-44), Natural Selection (1858), Charles R. Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace
Mayr E. 1997. “What is science?” in This is biology: The science of the living world, pp 24-44. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Scott EC. 1997. Antievolution and creationism in the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology 26:263-289
Talbot M. 2005. Darwin in the Dock. The New Yorker, pp 66-77 Berkman MB et al. 2008. Evolution and Creationism in America’s
Classroom: A National Portrait. PLoS Biology, 6:0920-0924
Next week Genetics and the development of evolutionary theory
Mendelian and molecular genetics Population genetics Evolutionary development biology (Evo Devo)
Reading The Human Species, Chpts 2 (Human genetics), 3 (Evolutionary
forces), 8 (Paleoanthropology) Course packet
Tattersall I. 2000. Paleoanthropology: The last half-century. Evolutionary Anthropology 9:2-16
Foley R. 2001. In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative perspectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology 10:5-14
Carroll SB. 2003. Genetics and the making of Homo sapiens. Nature. 422:849-857
“Beyond Stones and Bones”, Newsweek, March 19, 2007. Topic and abstract for journal analysis is due
Journal analysis
Your topic (the relevant question(s) and which other subfield you will be examining) and an abstract (<200 words) including your search strategy (which journals are you using and why) is due at the beginning of class on Jan 21. In your abstract, describe the problem you are addressing and
some of the history of this issue. Be sure to specify your two additional journals, and why you chose them, as well as the other subfield of anthropology that you will be studying. I encourage you to discuss your topic with me in advance, in person or by email.
The final paper is due at our last class, Feb 18. Turn in your original (graded) abstract with the final paper
From last week
Current hot topics on humans
Top 10 mysteries about humans http://www.livescience.com/history/091026-top10-
origins-mysteries.html Top 10 things that make humans special
http://www.livescience.com/culture/091030-origins-top10-special.html
Anthropology
Important to remember that a strength of anthropology is its holistic approach What’s the difference between cultural anthropology and
sociology? What’s the difference between biological anthropology and
biology? Holistic view is not limited to the 4 anthropology subfields,
but any relevant field Many Anthro departments are splitting along subfield lines
Why do you think more anthropological research is not truly interdisciplinary? How could you make your research relevant to
someone outside your subfield?
Modified from Balaresque et al. 2007
Expansion out of Africa
Peopling of the
Americas
Domestication of the donkey
Origin and expansion of Semitic
speakers
Genetic and cultural components to ethnicity and health
Demography Migration/colonization
Out of Africa Peopling of New World
Population origins Semitic speakers
Admixture Puerto Ricans
Adaptation Natural selection
Skin color Agriculture/domestication Disease
Origin/intro to naïve pop’s Genetic/cultural risk factors
Balaresque et al. 2007
Chpt 1 - Science and Evolution
Development of evolutionary thought
Darwin and natural selection
Misconceptions about evolution
Science as a way of knowing
Science, evolution, and creationism
Landmarks in Euro-American Thought about Human Origins and Diversity
2000
1900
1800
1700
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
Years A.D.
Darwin publishes On the Origin of Species
Age of European Exploration
Development of Evolutionary Thought Ancient roots – differences and origins Renaissance – empiricism and science 17th-18th centuries – naturalism 1800-1859 – Racial origins 1859-1900 – Evolution and racial origins 1900-1950 – Description and classification 1950-present – New Physical Anthropology
Pre-Darwinian Theories and Seeds of (R)evolution
Pre-Darwinian thought Ancient Greek philosophy
Static, unchanging view of the world Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) Greek philosopher and naturalist Historia Animalium describes similarities between man,
apes, and monkeys Differences attributed to position in the scala naturae (Great
Chain of Being)
Aristotle’s notion of scala naturae did not incorporate racial hierarchy Argued for environmental causes of variation
Wooly hair of Africans due to harsh, arid climate Straight hair of Thracians and Scythians due to moist air
Carolus Linneaus (1707-1778)
Swedish botanist and founder of taxonomy
Epitomized focus on description and classification
Systema Naturae (1735-1766)
Identified two-dimensional structure of nature, as opposed to one-dimensional “Great Chain”
Great Chain vs Linnaean Taxonomy
Source: Marks (1995) Human Biodiversity
Linnaeus’s Classification of Humans
Homo sapiens in order Primates
Four geographic varieties mix culture and biology H. sapiens europaeus H. sapiens asiaticus H. sapiens americanus H. sapiens afer
George Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon (1707-1788)
French naturalist Opposed Linnaeus
No unit higher than species Species comprise Great Chain
of Being Dismissed evolutionary
implications of Linnaean ideas Posited microevolution in
response to environment, but denied macroevolution
Buffon and Human Variation
Buffon rejected classification as goal of study, aimed to describe and explain diversity
Varieties of the Human Species (1749) How is variation patterned? What explains patterns of variation?
Buffon and Linneaus represent two strains of thought in 20th century anthropology
Georges Cuvier (1769-1832)
French zoologist and founder of paleontology
Embraced Linnaeus’s nested hierarchy, but not evolutionary implications
Best remembered for catastrophism Mass extinctions, repopulation
gives appearance of change Consistent with Biblical view
Jean Baptiste, Chevalier of Lamarck (1744-1829)
French aristocrat Regarded classification as
sterile and theorized about process of evolutionary change
Inheritance of acquired characteristics Organism altered during lifetime
by environment and behavior Change inherited by offspring
James Hutton (1726-1797)
Scottish geologist Developed principle of
uniformitarianism (1785) Same geologic processes
(erosion, continental drift) operate today as in the past
Earth has long history Supernatural theories not
required to explain history Earth’s geology shaped by
processes observable today e.g. Deep soils formed by the
weathering of bedrock over 1000s of years
Sir Charles Lyell (1797-1875)
Scottish geologist Promoted and extended
principle of uniformitarianism
Three-volume Principles of Geology (1830-1833)
Darwin – “I always feel as if my books came half out of Lyell’s brain.”
Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
Born into intellectual family in northern England
Enrolled in medicine, then graduated in theology
Joined HMS Beagle in 1831 as “unpaid gentleman scholar and naturalist”
Voyage of the HMS Beagle
Darwin and Wallace
Darwin outlined theory of natural selection in 1837
20 years later, young Wallace developed same theory
Darwin and Wallace co-presented at Linnaean Society of London (1858)
Darwin published On the Origin of Species a year later
Alfred Wallace1823-1913
Darwin’s observations
Much morphological variation Variation made sense in terms of
environment Creatures in cold climates had fur Birds in areas where insects live deep inside tree
trunks have long beaks
Darwin’s Postulates
Infinite ability of populations to grow, but finite ability of environments to support growth Malthus showed that the planet can not support
uncontrolled growth, i.e. a large percentage of offspring will die and Darwin helps provide the answer as to who will die
Within populations, organisms vary in ways that affect ability to survive and reproduce
Variations are transmitted from parents to offspring
Natural selection – evolution by variation and selective retention
An Example – Darwin’s Finches
Darwin identified multiple species of finches on Galápagos Islands, attributed special role in his thinking
Drought and Darwin’s Finches
Natural experiment– severe drought—tests Darwin’s postulates As food supply shrank,
finch population declined
Beak depth affected survival
Parents and offspring had similar beak depths
Darwin’s Finches
Directional selection Beak depth influences individual’s probability of survival Distribution of beak depth shifts to right due to selection
Darwin’s Finches
Balancing selection Selection maintains status quo when most common type is
best adapted Selection required to keep populations the same, not just to
change
Individual Selection
Selection arises from competition among individuals, not among populations or species
Example – individual reproductive success vs species’ survival
Selection may favor high individual fertility, even if population growth threatens survival of species
Evolution of Complex Adaptations
Small variations are important Continuous, not discontinuous traits important Complexity arises from accumulation of small random
variations Typing monkeys - “Methinks it is like a weasel.”
Chance of randomly typing monkeys reproducing Shakespeare - ~ 1 in a trillion. Same as chance of randomly producing a human eye in a single trial
Convergence - complex adaptations have evolved independently multiple times
Selection favors intermediate phenotypes
Selection of Intermediate Steps
Living gastropod mollusks illustrate intermediate steps between eye cup and camera-type eye
Rates of Evolutionary Change
14 living species in Galápagos
All descended from single species within last half million years
Evolution of Evolutionary Theory
Darwin could not explain how variation was maintained Assumed blending inheritance Could not explain evolution beyond original range
of variation
Acceptance of Darwinian mechanisms awaited rediscovery of Mendelian genetics
Modern Synthesis (1930-1950)
Evo-Devo (1980-present)
Science andCreationism
What is Science?
[Empirical science] is systematic description and classification of objects, events, [and] processes, and the explanation of those events and processes by theories that employ lawful regularities, all of the descriptive and explanatory statements employed being testable against publicly observable data.
O’Meara, 1989
Science Is…
Empirical
Systematic and explicit
Theoretical, explanatory, predictive
Self-critical, reflexive, based on testing
Public
Creationist Claims
“Evolution is only a theory” Actually, evolution is both a fact and a theory
Fact is “an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as ‘true.’”
Theory is “a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses.”
National Academy of Sciences
Creationist Claims
“Evolution is unscientific, because it is not testable or falsifiable.” Microevolution and macroevolution Fossil record and macroevolutionary hypotheses
“Living things must be products of intelligent design, because natural selection could not produce some complex beings.” Evolution of camera-type eye Convergence
Chpt 4 - Speciation and Phylogeny
Overview
Microevolution macroevolution Species concepts
Biological species Ecological species
Evolutionary forces Systematics, phylogeny, and taxonomy
Definitions
Microevolution Changes in allele frequencies over relatively short time
periods/small geographic ranges/small genomic ranges Evolution over short time periods Occurs in our lifetime, i.e. is observable to all of us
Macroevolution Changes in allele frequencies over relatively long time
periods/large geographic ranges/large genomic ranges Evolution over long time periods
Creationists have problem with macroevolution b/c they say we can’t directly observe macroevolution
We can’t do million year experiments, but we can make testable predictions, like in geology or astronomy
What Are Species? Species are real biological categories, not abstractions
Paleospecies are more abstract concepts
Controversy about how species are defined Biological species concept
Group of organisms that naturally interbreed and produce fertile offspring
Ecological species concept Natural selection plays important role in species differences Reproductive isolation not necessary
Species occupy different ecological niches, but are not necessarily physically isolated from each other
Phylogenetic species concept Some level of genetic variation is chosen to define different
species
Modes of Speciation
Anagenesis Cladogenesis
Phylogeny and Systematics
Phylogeny refers to evolutionary relationships among group of species, often depicted as a “family tree” What is the “outgroup” in this tree?
Systematics is construction of phylogenies
Taxonomy is use of phylogenies in naming and classification
Approaches to systematics
Evolutionary systematics Considers all homologous traits, primitive and derived Based on descent and overall similarity Complex algorithms to evaluate genetic distance or
coalescence and translate that relationship into a tree Cladistics
Argues that phylogenies should be constructed only on shared derived traits
Much simpler, less sophisticated and probably less realistic
Natural selection
Mechanism for evolutionary change favoring the survival and reproduction of some organisms over others because of their biological characteristics.
Requirements: Variation must exist a priori in order for natural
selection to act, i.e. natural selection does not create a variant but it ‘prefers’ it
Preferred variant/phenotype must act in such a way as to influence fitness of offspring, i.e. Alzheimer’s will not be selected against b/c it occurs late in life long after childbearing years
Misconceptions of evolution and natural selection
Bigger is better Newer is better Faster is better Natural selection always works Evolution has a direction or goal Natural selection always produces perfect structures All structures are adaptive Current structure reflect initial adaptations
Natural selection will solve every problem – Will natural selection solve problem of stress-based disease?
What is evolution?
From a genetic perspective, not phenotypic At the most basic, causative definition
What is evolution?
Changes in allele frequencies over time
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time?
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time?
Mutation Natural selection Genetic drift Gene flow
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time? Mutation
Introduces a new variant, initially at very low frequency Natural selection Genetic drift Gene flow
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time? Mutation
Introduces a new variant, initially at very low frequency Natural selection
Alleles that increase fitness exhibit an increase in freq Alleles that decrease fitness exhibit a decrease in freq Balancing selection/heterozygote advantage = heterogzygote has
selective advantage so frequencies of both alleles are selected to be in balance (sickle cell allele of hemoglobin protein)
Genetic drift Gene flow
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time? Mutation
Introduces a new variant, initially at very low frequency Natural selection
Alleles that increase fitness exhibit an increase in freq Alleles that decrease fitness exhibit a decrease in freq Balancing selection/heterozygote advantage = heterogzygote has
selective advantage so frequencies of both alleles are selected to be in balance (sickle cell allele of hemoglobin protein)
Genetic drift Random change in allele frequency from generation to generation
Gene flow
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time? Mutation
Introduces a new variant, initially at very low frequency
Natural selection Alleles that increase fitness exhibit an increase in freq Alleles that decrease fitness exhibit a decrease in freq Balancing selection/heterozygote advantage = heterogzygote has selective
advantage so frequencies of both alleles are selected to be in balance (sickle cell allele of hemoglobin protein)
Genetic drift Random change in allele frequency from generation to generation
Gene flow One individual moves into a new population and reproduces there
New genes are introduced into a population Gene flow makes 2 populations more similar No gene flow → reproductive isolation → genetic divergence → speciation
What are the evolutionary forces that can change allele frequencies over time?
Mutation Natural selection Genetic drift Gene flow In reality, all 4 forces, or a subset, can act at the
same time
Bioethics
Review of research involving human subjects
Federal regulations require that all research involving human subjects be approved by an IRB prior to the research
Institutional review board = IRB Virtually all universities and research institutes will have their own IRBs
Composed of professors/scientists who volunteer their time Must be research – anything commercial is not subject to same
regulations, e.g. if someone pays to have genetic typing performed or forensic case work or contract archaeology
Also excludes general medical practice, i.e. distinction between accepted and experimental therapy
What is a human subject?
A human subject is a living individual about whom a researcher obtains: Data through intervention or interaction w/ the individual Identifiable private information
IRB regulations do not cover: Dead persons – no protection for the sample of
someone who has died Samples that are already collected and that have no
identifying information (i.e. are anonymous)
Goal of IRB review
To safeguard the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in biomedical and behavioral research
Guided by the Belmont Report The Belmont Report
Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchApril 18, 1979
Written in response to past abuses of human subjects in biomedical research WWII
Abuses of concentration camp victims Tuskogee Syphilis Project
Gov’t sponsored study (1932-1972) that denied effective treatment for syphilis to 399 African-American men in order to document the natural history of the disease
Three basic principlesBelmont Report
Respect for persons Subjects must be given the opportunity to choose what will or will
not happen to them Principle of informed consent and the consent process (information,
comprehension and voluntariness) Beneficence
“do no harm” “maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms” Extends to both investigator and society
Justice Requires that there be fair procedures and outcomes in the
selection or subjects, both individually and socially (no one asked to unfairly bear burdens)
Projects in which the study populations are intimately involved with the project
Iceland – National human genome project deCode Genetics, an Icelandic start-up genomics
company, spearheaded a project to map the genome of the Icelandic people as part of a larger medical database
African Ancestry project Provides DNA testing to determine indigenous African
paternal and maternal lineages among African Americans
deCode Genetics Iceland is ideal location for a genetic disease association study
Historically small population (~50,000 19th century & ~275,000 today) Relatively homogeneous and comparatively isolated
Disease candidate genes may be easier to identify Detailed genealogical records for generations Detailed medical records dating back to 1915
In 1998 Icelandic parliament passed a bill authorizing the construction of a national medical database
Lots of controversy, some detractors, but general Icelandic public seems to be in favor of project Informed consent as far as medical records goes was based on the
principle of presumed, rather than informed, consent, i.e. people had to specifically request that their medical records not be used
Many papers have identified genes involved in schizophrenia, heart attacks, asthma, pain, vascular disease, diabetes, etc
African Ancestry project
Motivated by African-Americans’ desire for more information about their ancestry There is only limited historical info
available for African-Americans prior to their enslavement
From 1619-1850, millions of indigenous west and central Africans were enslaved
Primarily from Senegal south through the Cape of Good Hope and north along eastern Africa to Cape Delgado
African Ancestry project, cont
Spurred by African Burial Ground project In 1991, human remains were uncovered from an 18th
century burial ground of enslaved African in lower Manhattan
African American community became a major contributor (both financial and intellectual) to a research project with these aims: What are the origins of the population? What was the physical quality of life in 18th century NYC? What can the site reveal about the biological and cultural transition
from African to African American identities?
My experiences
Panama Explaining my research to indigenous groups in Panama
Genetics is my way of understanding history Collecting trip in Panama w/ Panamanian colleague Different decision-making process How to inform an indigenous person about my research?
Yemen and Mongolia Different experience – completely positive and enthusiastic
Bottom line
Best research involves research subjects from the beginning and throughout project
Best research honors the beliefs and goals of the research subjects Don’t expect them to buy into “greater good” argument
because that is a standard of our culture, not all cultures Best research assumes that research subjects can
be educated about the research as long as you put yourself in their position
Discussion questions
Scientists and the general public Do scientists/the general public have a “right” to
learn about the human past? Do scientists/the general public have a
“responsibility” to learn about the human past? Individuals
Do individuals have a “responsibility” to participate in research for the common good?
Do individuals have a “right” to participate in research for the common good?