ANNEXURE – PROJECT LOCATION · 2017. 6. 27. · Mujpur, Vadodara, Gujarat ANNEXURE – DETAILS OF SURVEY NOS. EXISITNG PROPOSED ADDITION TOTAL AMENDMENT STATUS Survey No. Area,

M/s. Gulbrandsen Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Vill. Mujpur, Vadodara, Gujarat

ANNEXURE – PROJECT LOCATION

Latitude: 22.256353°, Logitude: 73.001486°


ANNEXURE – DETAILS OF SURVEY NOS.

EXISITNG PROPOSED ADDITION TOTAL AMENDMENT STATUS

Survey No. Area, m2

Survey No. Area, m2

Survey No. Area, m2

194 1,784 194 1,784.00 Under Purchase 195 2,735 195 2,735 NA received 196 2,973 196 2,973 NA received 197 3,449 197 3,449 NA received 198 2,497 198 2,497 NA received

199 2,378 199 2,378 NA received 200 5,351 200 5,351 NA received 202 1,903 202 1,903 NA received 203 2,616 203 2,616 NA received 204 7,611 204 7,611 NA received 205 3,567 205 3,567 NA received

206 10,475 206 10,475.00 Under Purchase 265b 1,892 265b 1,892 NA received 266a 951 266a 951 NA received 266b 966 266b 966 NA received 285 3,211 285 3,211 NA received 286 2,497 286 2,497 NA received 287 3,092 287 3,092 NA received 288 3,092 288 3,092 NA received 289 3,211 289 3,211 NA received 290 1,665 290 1,665 NA received 291 1,665 291 1,665 NA received 292 2,378 292 2,378 NA received 293 3,092 293 3,092 NA received 294 3,686 294 3,686 NA received 296 2,854 296 2,854 NA received 297 3,330 297 3,330 NA received 298 2,796 298 2,796 NA received 321 713 321 713 NA received 322 713 322 713 NA received 323 1,665 323 1,665 NA received 326 1,427 326 1,427 NA received

327 713 327 713 NA received 449 11,416 449 11,416 Gram Namuna: 7

Total 68,322.00 Total 36,042.00 TOTAL 104,364.00


ANNEXURE – DETAILS OF AREA DISTRIBUTION

SN DESCRITION EXISITNG PROPOSED ADDITIONTOTAL

AMENDMENT AREA,

m2 % Distri. AREA,

m2% Distri. AREA,

m2 % Distri.

1 Ground coverage for construction

22992.5 33.65 5622 15.60 28614.5 27.42

2 Roads, Pavement& Parking

26143.5 38.27 8606 23.88 34749.5 33.30

3 Greenbelt & Plantation

19186 28.08 21814 60.52 41000 39.29

TOTAL 68322 100 36042 100 104364 100


ANNEXURE – LAND DOCUMENTS


ANNEXURE - DETAILS OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE

SN Hazardous Material EXISITNG PROPOSED ADDITION

TOTAL AMENDMENT

Storage capacity

Type of Storage

Storage capacity

Type of Storage

Storage capacity

Type of Storage

Product Storage / Day Tank 1 TnBAl 11 MT X2

08 MTX1Tank - - 11 MT X2

08 MTX1 Tank

2 TiBal 10 MT X3 05 MT X1

Tank - - 10 MT X3 05 MT X1

Tank

3 Di Ethyl Zinc 7 MT X1 Tank - - 7 MT X1 Tank4 TEAL 50 KL X3

35 KL X1Tank - - 50 KL X3

35 KL X1 Tank

6 DEAC 25 MT X1 Tank - - 25 MT X1 Tank7 EASC 27 MT X1 Tank - - 27 MT X1 Tank8 Tin Tetra Chloride 40 KL X1

60 KL X1Tank - - 40 KL X1

60 KL X1 Tank

9 Aluminium Chloride Solution

50 KL X 4 30 KLX1 25 KL X1 30 KL X1 10KL X1

Tank - - 50 KL X 4 30 KLX1 25 KL X1 30 KL X1 10KL X1

Tank

11 Di Butyl Tin Dichloride 8 KL X1 Tank - - 8 KL X1 Tank12 Mono Butyl Tin Chloride 20 KL X1 Tank - - 20 KL X1 Tank13 Poly Aluminium Chloride 250 KL X1 Tank - - 250 KL X1 TankRaw Material Storage 1 Aluminium 70 MT Ton Bags - - 70 MT Ton Bags2 Sodium 250 kg. Drums - - 250 kg. Drums3 n-Butene / i-Butene 19.9 KL X2

(39.8 KL) C.S. Tank 19.9KLX2

(39.8 KL) Day tank 9.5 KLX2

C.S. Tank 19.9 KL X4 (79.6 KL) Day tank 9.5 KLX2

C.S. Tank

4 Hydrogen 232 kg. (459

Cylinder)

Cylinder 152-Rack

- - 232 kg. (459

Cylinder)

Cylinder 152-Rack

5 Tantalum 200 Kg Drums - - 200 Kg Drums6 Ethylene NA Pipeline - - NA Pipeline7 Chlorine 34 Nos Tonner - - 34 Nos Tonner8 Aluminium Chloride

Anhydrous 20 MT BINS - - 20 MT BINS

9 Zinc Chloride Anhydrous 50 MT Bags - - 50 MT Bags10 Hydrochloric Acid

25-30 % 35 KL Tank - - 35 KL Tank

11 Cyanauric Chloride 12 MT 375 kgs Bags

- - 12 MT 375 kgs Bags

12 Caustic Soda 20 KL Tank - - 20 KL Tank13 Titanium Iso propoxide 200 Kg Drums - - 200 Kg Drums14 Titanium Penta Chloride 200 Kg Drums - - 200 Kg Drums15 Acetic Acid 525 Kg Drums - - 525 Kg DrumsFuel storage 1 LPG 1000 kg 19 kgs

Cylinders- - 1000 kg 19 kgs

Cylinders2 Furnace Oil (FO)/ LDO 40 KL Tank - - 40 KL Tank3 Natural gas NA Pipeline - - NA Pipeline

Solvent storage 1 ODCB 10 KL X1 Tank - - 10 KLX1 Tank2 Di Butyl Ether 3.5 KL X2

6.0 KL X1Tank - - 3.5 KLX2

6.0 KLX1 Tank

3 N Octene, N Hexane, Heptane, Pentane, Hexene Toluene Ethanol, m-Xylene and other solvent of Class A & B Petroleum

16 KL X 4 64 KL

U/G Tank 16 KL X 4 64 KL

200 Ltr X 10 No.

U/G Tank

Drums

16 KLX 8 128 KL

200 Ltr X

10 No.

U/G Tank

Drums


ANNEXURE - DETAILS OF FLARE

There are existing 3 nos. of flares as detailed below:

Flare Details

Flare Height & Diameter

Design Capacity (Nm3/hr)

Design Capacity (kg/hr)

Actual Load (Nm3/hr)

Actual Load (kg/hr)

Flare 1 Height: 19 meters Dia.: 0.15 meter

8854 3243 374 - 1794 505 - 1644


1696 3409 416 799


1760 2728 582 902

It is proposed to bifurcate Flare – 1 load to Flare -4 as per details below:

Flare Details

Flare Height & Diameter

Design Capacity (Nm3/hr)

Design Capacity (kg/hr)

Actual Load (Nm3/hr)

Actual Load (kg/hr)


8854 3243 374 - 1593 483 - 1462


1696 3409 416 799


1760 2728 582 902


1403 1133 19 - 317 22 - 301


Brief description for Flare-1:

• Process vents from Alkyl plants(Products like TEAl, TnBAl ,TiBAl,DiBAlH ,DEZ and Alkyl Derivatives ) are connected to Flare-1.

• Process vents from the plant are diverted to vent buffer stocommon vent header.

• Vent gas from all plants mix together in common vent header and goes to flare via knock out drum.

• ProcessventinFlare-1 is mixture of nitrogen gas and other hydrocarbon gases like Ethylene, Butene, Hydrogen, Nitrogen and traces of Alkyl.

Problem statement:

• In above flare set-up,it is observed that some solid deposit sat flare bottom inlet line post KOD pot.

• DEZ plant vent is routed through vent buffer sand it mixes withth event stream from other Alkyl plant sat KOD.

• As per study and practical experience, flare bottom inlet line chocking frequency has increased considerably after start-up of DEZ product.

• There is a high probability that these solid precipitates due to very slow reaction when vent gas from DEZ setup and vent gas from other Alkyl products mix in common KOD.

• Due to this solid precipitation, cleaning of flare bottom piece is required at regular intervals.

• Opening vent line at regular interval is a major Safety hazard.

Proposed solution:

• To address to the above problem statement, piping modifications is proposed at flare bottom in let to reduce vent gas contact time, but with no significant benefit.

• Only possible solution is to separate vent gas of DEZ plant from alkyl plant. Dedicated flaring of vent gas from DEZ plant will address the issue of solid deposition in flare bottom line. Thus, avoid safety

hazard associated with flare bottom line opening.

• It is proposed to install separate Flare-4 for DEZ plant.

• Vent load of DEZ plant from existing Flare-1will be diverted to DEZ Flare-4.

• Proportional amount of vent load in Flare-1will be reduced.

• There will be no change inover all Flaring load of Alkyl unit. Vent load to existing Flare-1(Alkyl plant ) will be distributed between Flare-1( Alkyl plant other than DEZ plant) and Flare-4(DEZ plant).


Existing Block Diagram for Flare-1:




Proposed Block Diagram for Flare –1 & Flare – 4:


Existing Vent Load Summary for Flare - 1: Hydrogendensity@30°C: 0.080 kg/m3 Ethylenedensity@30°C: 1.126 kg/m3 Butenedensity@30°C: 2.252 kg/m3 Nitrogendensity@30°C: 1.126 kg/m3

Streams Existing vent load for Flare - 1 Hydrogen Ethylene Butene Nitrogen Total

Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr

1 725 58 178 200 190 427 269 303 1362 988

2 269 21.68 99 111 430 967.45 303.62 342 1102 1443

3 434 35 78 88 385 867 446 502 1343 1492

4 0 0 31 35 22 50 373 420 426 505

5 0 0 50 56 320 721 4 5 374 782

6 725 58 246 277 339 764 484 545 1794 1644

Emergency Load

6800 547 1298 1462 339 764 417 470 8854 3243

Proposed Vent Load Summary for Flare –1& Flare - 4:

Streams Proposed vent load for Flare - 1 Hydrogen Ethylene Butene Nitrogen Total


1 709 57 145 164 190 427 216 244 1260 891

2 216 17 0 0 430 967 139 156 784 1141

3 394 32 0 0 385 867 369 416 1147 1314

4 0 0 31 35 22 50 354 399 407 483

5 0 0 50 56 320 721 4 5 374 782

6 683 55 164 185 339 764 407 458 1593 1462

Emergency Load

6373 513 450 507 339 764 289 326 7452 2110

Streams Proposed vent load for Flare – 4 (DEZ) Hydrogen Ethylene Butene Nitrogen Total


1 17 1 32 36 0 0 53 59 102 97

2 53 4 99 111 0 0 165 186 317 301

3 41 3 78 88 0 0 77 87 195 178

4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 22 19 22

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 42 3 82 92 0 0 77 87 201 182

Emergency Load

427 34 848 955 0 0 128 144 1403 1133


Streams Proposed vent load for Flare – 1 &4

Hydrogen Ethylene Butene Nitrogen Total Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr Nm3/hr kg/hr

1 725 58 178 200 190 427 269 303 1362 988

2 269 21.68 99 111 430 967.45 303.62 342 1102 1443

3 434 35 78 88 385 867 446 502 1343 1492

4 0 0 31 35 22 50 373 420 426 505

5 0 0 50 56 320 721 4 5 374 782

6 725 58 246 277 339 764 484 545 1794 1644

Emergency Load

6800 547 1298 1462 339 764 417 470 8854 3243

The proposed total vent load for Flare -1 & 4 is same as for existing vent load of Flare – 1. There is no

change in vent load for Flare – 2 & 3.

Documents

ANNEXURE – PROJECT LOCATION · 2017. 6. 27. · Mujpur, Vadodara, Gujarat ANNEXURE – DETAILS OF SURVEY NOS. EXISITNG PROPOSED ADDITION TOTAL AMENDMENT STATUS Survey No. Area,