Upload
alexander-whitehead
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Are you still alive?I thought you were closed down years ago...
Roger MillsBiosciences and Environmental Sciences Librarianand Manager, Oxford Forest Information Service
Oxford University Library ServicesFebruary 2005
Trees matter
• In many disciplines:– Forest and plant
sciences– Taxonomy– Climatology– Environmental
change– Geography– Ecology
– Etc etc
– Earth sciences– Biochemistry– Medicine– Development
studies– Economics– Social sciences– Law
Data about trees
• Takes a long time to collect
• Maybe several generations
• How to keep comparable data accessible
• The Oxford story– Hanging on in quiet desperation
is the English way
For example
following a search of your on-line catalogue, I see that you retain the following journal :- Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur das Forstwesen…..the one that I am interested in is by COAZ, J, entitled "Kulturversuch mit auslandischen holzarten inder Waldung des Schlosses Marschlins, Gemeindegebiet von Igis, in Graubunden". It was published in 1917… (15-12-04)
I am trying to track down a report by C. E. Lane Poole who was an Australian forester. He wrote a report called "The Forests of Erromago" in 1948. Erromago is an island in the New Hebrides (now called Vanuatu) ….It may well be a semi-manuscript , rather than a formal publication. (5-1-05)
I am writing to enquire about a book which I understand my Grandfather wrote when in the Indian Forestry Service. He retired in October 1926, so I imagine it was written before that time, but I really don't know….The reference I have seen was "Henry Farrington, the Chief Conservator, was a specialist on botany; he was the author of a very useful flora of the trees of the Northern and Berar Circles". (11-01-05)
It was a most productive visit to your library for 'grey' literature on the useful plants of tropical Africa for the PROTA project (11-01-05)
I am working for a German biodiversity research group studying the forests of Kakamega in Kenya and of Budongo and Mabira in Uganda. We are attempting to trace the forest cover changes for these areas and I have heard that you have some archives relating to them. Is that true?I am interested in old maps or absolutely any written archival material relating to these forests, and of any date, but the older the better (12-12-04)
Field trials
• The Rothamsted model• Forest plantations not so controlled• Political change, commercial
pressures, social unrest, poverty threaten continuity
• Colonial records ‘gone home’ or lost or scattered
• Significance not recognised• Practising forester needs ready
access, not historical research
IUFRO
• Information Clearing House to record forest data planned 1906 for Switzerland
• War intervened, funds lost to inflation• British Imperial Forestry Institute
founded 1924• Gathered UK-generated reports,
indexed in Current Monthly Record• Passed to Imperial Forestry Bureau
1938• Forestry Abstracts 1939-
Clearing House
• IFI/IFB – Oxford by default• Post-WW2 declaration: ‘authors should
generally send a copy of their work to Forestry Abstracts’
• Free deposit still works– With a little help from my friends
• CABI/Oxford Agreement still current• Recording/storing/retrieving not free• Why should Oxford pay?• Why? Why? Why? Why?....
Threat no. 1
• Space• New building 1950, completely full by
1960• Microfilming programme funded by
Ford Foundation 1964• Through support of one man – Frank
Wadsworth, USDA• Three-year funding stretched to 30
years through sales• Now going digital – at a price
Threat no. 2
• Academic priorities change– Undergraduate teaching: forestry >
agricultural science > biology– Postgraduate teaching: forestry >
forest science > environmental science
– Research: whole plant > molecular
• And will change again…
Threat no. 3
• Institutional re-organisation• Departmental reorganization: forestry /
botany / agriculture > Plant Sciences 1985
• CABI centralization – away from Oxford 1987
• ‘Oxford’s Forestry Felled’• You don’t do forestry any more, do
you?• So why should I send you my stuff?
Threat no. 4
• £££££££
• Resource allocation
• Full economic costing
• Reduce staff – 1985: 12 >1995: 8 > 2000 > 2.5
• Reduce space– 1985: 3000m > 2000 > 2000m– You can’t keep a growing lad down
Something’s got to give
• Restructuring
• 100 libraries > one library
• Gradually
• Plant Sciences > OULS: Nov 2000
Identity crises
• Oxford Forest Information Service– Collections may move, service
remains
• But not everywhere
• UK agriculture: 50% of organizations in membership of IAALD/Aslib merged, moved, changed owners, role, funding source in past decade
New publishing paradigms
• Speed communication
• Wider communication
• Multiple versions
• Multiple formats
• Archival conversion
• Oxford-Google: 1 million 19th century books: digitizing 4000 books/day
The Biggest Threat of All:It’s on the web
• Well it was….• Race against time for
– Electronic archiving– Electronic legal deposit
• Born digital – die digital• Endless refreshment• Endless cash• Who pays? • And why? why? why?
We’re working on that…
• The Problem of the UK Forest Research Programme Archive
• Closing in March 2006
• 320m shelving
• 40 years of research, £50m of public money
• Who keeps it? Who makes it searchable? Who pays?
FRONTIERS IN FOREST INFORMATION
5-7 December 2005
A centenary conference at St Anne’s
College, Oxford
Further details from March 2005:www.plantlib.ox.ac.uk/forestry