4
PARTITIONING DISSOLVED INORGANIC AND ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS USING ACIDIFIED MOLYBDATE AND ISOBUTANOL K. JAYACHANDRAN, A. P. SCHWAB,* A N D B. A . D. HETRICK Abstract Quantification of P-mineralization rate in soil using isotopic dilution requires that soluble inorganic 32 P ( 32 P, ) be determined without inter- ference from soluble organic 32 P ("PJ. Therefore, a method is needed to partition M P, a n d "P 0 into physically separate solutions before ra- diation counting. A previously suggested method of extracting P , into isobutanol with acidified molybdate was tested fo r efficiency o f sep- aration from P 0 . Inorganic P as KH 2 PO 4 w a s com pletel y recovered in th e isobutanol phase with acid molybdate. Organic P (glycerophos- phate) remained in the aqueous phase during th e extraction. No P hydrolysis was observed when sodium phytate, glycerophospbate, ri- bonucleic acid, adenosine 2'- and 3'-monophosphate, a n d cytidine 2' - an d 3'-monophosphate were extracted, but detectable amounts of adenosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolyzed. This technique was tested on four Kansas soils, and the levels of inorganic a n d organic P obtained by this method were th e same a s those detected by conventional anal- yses. I N SOILS with high concentrations of labile organic and low inorganic P, tests of available P based solely on P j may underestimate P availability. The high productivity of certain native prairie soils, de- spite their low available P,, sugg ests that labile P 0 contributes signif icantly to P availability, presumably via mineralization. Organic P is generally measured indirectly as the difference between total P and P ; (Watanabe and Olsen, 1965; Halm et al., 1972; Salder and Stewart, 1974; Bowman an d Cole, 1978; Chau- han et al., 1978; Chater and Mattingly, 1979). Net changes in total P 0 and Pj with time can then be used to estimate net P mineralization. To measure gross mineralization, an isotopic-dilution method was pro- posed by Sweet (1981) and later used by Walbridge an d Vitousek (1987). The technique uses isotopic di- lution by measuring 32 P t without interference from 32 P 0 . This requires that 32 P t be physically separated from 32 P 0 before p emission counting. Pons and Guthrie (1946) developed a liquid-extrac- tion technique (using isobutan ol with acidified molyb- date) to remove the interference of P 0 in the determination of Pj in plant tissue. The P ; is com- plexed by the molybdate, the phosphomolybdate is extracted into the isobutanol, and the P 0 remains in the aqueous phase. Sweet (1981) adopted this method to separate 32 Pj from 32 P 0 in determining gross min- eralization. Detailed methodology and a critical eval- uation of the technique have not been published, however. We needed a method to determine the mineraliza- tion of P in soils with native vegetation or low-input K . Jayachandran a n d B.A.D. Hetrick, Dep. of Plant Pathology, an d A.P. Schwab, Dep. of Agronomy, Throckmorton Hall, Kan- sa s State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5502. Contribution n o. 90-509-J from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Received 24 Apr. 1991. * Corresponding author. Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J . 56:762-765 (1992). agriculture in which P 0 significantly contributes to P fertility. The method of Walbridge and Vitousek (1987) appears suitable, but has not been tested. The overall objective of our research was to determine the effi- ciency of a modification of Pons and Guthrie's (1946) isobutanol extraction for partitioning P ; and P 0 . It was therefore necessary to determine whether all of the Pj is extracted into the isobutanol after mixing with aci- dified molybdate, whether all of the P 0 remains in the aqueous phase during the isobutanol-acidified molyb- date extraction, and whether labile P 0 was hydrolyzed during the extraction process as a result of exposure to 3 and 2 4 Materials an d Methods T h e sequence of analyses used in this study to determine the efficiency of the extraction procedure is illustrated in Fig. 1. The extraction procedure fo r mineralization deter- minations is outlined by a dashed line. The remaining steps were added to this study for verification purposes. The ex- traction procedure was initially tested on pure P compounds with KH 2 PO 4 a s a Pj source a n d Phy, Gly-P, RNA, AMP, ATP, and CMP (Sigma Chemical Co., St . Louis, MO) as representative P 0 sources. The top 25 cm of two agricultural soils and two native prairie soils were sampled near Manhattan, KS. The agri- cultural soils were Chase (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Aquic A rgiudoll) a n d Eudora silty clay loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Fluventic H apludol). The native prairie soils were silty a n d cherty clay loams of the Benfield-Florence com- plex (Benfield soils a re fine, mixed, mesic Udic Argius- tolls, Florence soils ar e clayey-skeletal, montmorillonitic, mesic Udic Argiustolls) and the Tully silty clay loam (fine, mixed, mesic Pachic Argiustoll). Table 1 gives selected properties of these soils as determined b y standard methods for this region (Dahnke, 1980). Isobutanol saturated with water (65 mL water L- 1 iso- butanol) and aqueous solutions saturated with isobutanol (65 mL isobutanol L- 1 water, 50 mL isobutanol L- 1 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 , or 35 mL isobutanol L- 1 2.3 M H 2 SO 4 ) were used for all reagents involved in the liquid extractions. M u- tual saturation of the solvents w a s necessary to minimize volume changes during extraction. A c i d i fi e d molybdate, used to complex Pj for extraction into isobutanol, was prepared by dissolving 50 g of am- monium molybdate [(NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 -4 H 2 0] in 1 L of 2.3 M H 2 SO 4 saturated with isobutanol. Unacidified, or neutral, molybdate solution was prepared by dissolving 50 g of am- monium molybdate in 1 L of water. A stock solution with molybdate wa s prepared b y dis- solving 30 g of ammonium molybdate and 0.727 g of an- timony potassium tartrate in 5 L of 1.25 M H 2 SO 4 . A similar stock solution without molybdate w a s prepared b y dissolv- in g 0.727 g of antimony potassium tartrate in 5 L of 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 saturated with isobutanol. Reducing agent w a s prepared daily by dissol ving 1.0 56 g L- 1 ascorbic acid in 200 mL of stock solution. Samples (pure P compounds or soil extracts) were pre- pared in 0.5 M NaHCO 3 . Fo r soils, 2 g of soil (air dried a n d sieved to pass a 2-m;m screen) were shaken with 40 mL 0.5 M NaHCO 3 (p H 8.5) for 30 mi n a n d filtered through Whatman no. 42 paper. Pure compounds were not ex- tracted, but aliquots of standard stock solutions were added directly to 40 mL of 0.5 M NaHCO 3 . A 5 mL aliquot of the HCO 3 extract was added to a 125 Abbreviations: 32 P, , soluble labeled inorganic P; 32 P 0 , soluble labeled organic P; Phy, sodium phytate; Gly-P, glycerophosphate; RNA, ribonucleic acid; AMP, adenosine 2 '- a n d 3'-monopho- phate; ATP, adenosine 5'-triphosphate; CMP, cytidine 2'- and 3'- monophosphate. 762

Artigo Fracionamento P Com Radioisotopo

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/2/2019 Artigo Fracionamento P Com Radioisotopo

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/artigo-fracionamento-p-com-radioisotopo 1/4

PARTITIONING DISSOLVED INORGANIC

AND ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS USING

ACIDIFIED MOLYBDATE AND ISOBUTANOL

K. J A Y A C H A N D R A N , A . P . S C H W A B , *A N D B. A . D. H E T R I C K

Abstract

Quanti f i cat ion of P - m i n e r a l i z a t i o n rate in soil using isotopic dilutionrequires that soluble inorganic

32P (

32P, ) be determined without inter-

ference from so luble organic32

P ("PJ. Therefore, a method is neededto part i t ion

MP, a nd "P 0 into physically separate solutions before ra-

diat ion count ing. A previously suggested method of extracting P , intoi sobutanol with ac idif ied molybdate w as tested fo r ef f ic iency o f sep-aration from P 0. Inorganic P a s K H 2PO 4 w a s com pletely recovered inth e i sobutanol phase with ac id molybdate. Organic P (glycerophos-p h a t e ) remained in the aqueous phase during th e extraction. N o P0

hydrolysis was observed w hen sodium phytate , g lycerophospbate , ri -bonucleic a c id , adenosine 2'- and 3' -mo no pho spha t e , a n d cytidine 2' -an d 3' -monophosphate were extracted, but detectable amounts o fadenosine 5' -tr iphosphate hydrolyzed. This technique was tested onfour Kan sas so i l s, an d the levels o f inorganic an d organic P obtainedby this method were th e same as those detected by convent ional anal -yses.

I N SOILS with high concentrations of labile organic

and low inorganic P, tests of available P basedsolely on P j may underestimate P availability. The

high productivity of certain native prairie soils, de-

spite their low available P,, suggests that labile P0

contributes significantly to P availability, presumablyvia mineralization. Organic P is generally measuredindirectly as the difference between total P and P;

(Watanabe andOlsen, 1965; Halm et al., 1972; Salderand Stewart, 1974; Bowman and Cole, 1978; Chau-

han et al., 1978; Chater and Mattingly, 1979). Netchanges in total P0 and Pj with time can then be used

agriculture in which P0 significantly contributes to Pfertility. The method of Walbridge and Vitousek (1987)appears suitable, but has not been tested. The overallobjective of our research was to determine the effi-ciency of a modification of Pons and Guthrie's (1946)isobutanol extraction for partitioning P; and P0. It was

therefore necessary to determine whether all of the Pj

is extracted into the isobutanol af t er mixing with aci-dified molybdate, whether all of the P0 remains in the

aqueous phase during the isobutanol-acidified molyb-

date extraction, and whether labile P0 was hydrolyzed

during the extraction process as a result of exposure

to HCO3- and H2SO4.

Materials and MethodsT h e s e q u e n c e of a n a l y s e s u s e d in th is s t u d y to d etermin e

the efficiency of the extraction proc ed ure is i l l u s tra te d inFig. 1. The extraction proc ed ure for min era l iza t ion d eter-min a t ion s is out l in ed b y a d a s h e d line. T h e r e m a i n i n g stepsw e r e a d d e d t o this study for verification purposes. T h e e x -traction procedure w a s in i t ia l ly tested on pure P compoundsw i t h KH2PO4 a s a Pj source a n d Phy, Gly-P, R N A , AMP,ATP, and CMP (Sigma C h e m i c a l Co., St. Louis, MO) asrepresentat ive P0 sources.

The t op 25 cm of t wo a g ric u l tura l soils and t wo nat i ve

prairie soils were s a m p le d n e a r M a n h a t t a n , KS. The agri-cul tural soils were Chase (fine, montmoril lonitic , mesic A q u i cA r g iu d o l l ) a n d E u d o r a silty clay loam (coarse-silty, mixed,mesic F l u v e n t i c H a p l u d o l ) . T h e n a t iv e prairie soils weresilty a n d cher t y clay loams of the Benfield-Florence com-plex (Be nfie l d soils a re f ine , mixed, mesic U d i c Argius-tolls, Florence soils are clayey-skeletal,montmoril lonit ic,mesic U d i c Argiustolls) a n d t h e Tully silty c lay loam (fine,mixed, mesic Pachic Argiustoll). Table 1 gives selectedproperties of these soils a s d etermin ed b y s t a n d a r d m e t h o d sfor th is region ( D a h n k e , 1980).

I sobuta n ol s a t u r a t e d w i t h w a t e r (65 mL w a t e r L-

1

iso-b u t a n o l ) a n d aqueous solutions satu rate d w i t h i s o b u t a n o l(65 mL i sobut anol L-

1w a t e r , 50 mL i sobut anol L-

10.5

M H2SO4, or 35 mL i sobut anol L-1

2.3 M H2SO4) wereused for all reagents involved in th e l iq u id extractions. M u -

8/2/2019 Artigo Fracionamento P Com Radioisotopo

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/artigo-fracionamento-p-com-radioisotopo 2/4

N O T E S 763

SOIL SA M PLE

d)

HCOa E X T R A C T

(2)

TOTAL P P|

TOTA L P -P|.P0

(5)

ISOBUTA NOL EXTR A CTION

WI TH A CID M OLYBDA TE

ISOBUTA NOL PHA SE AQ U EO U S PHA SE

Pi PO

(8)

ISOBUTA NOL EXTR A CTION

WI THO U T A CID M OLYBDA TE

ISOBUTA NOL PHA SE A QUEOUS PHA SE

N°P

T O T A L P Pj

TOTA L P - P j = P0

Fig. 1. The sequence of analyses used toevaluate the isobutanol-acidified molybdate extraction procedure for partitioning inorganic

from organic P. The steps within the dashed lines are to be used in determining P mineralization using isotopic dilution; the

remaining steps were used in this study to verify that the partitioning was complete.

mL separately f u n n e l fol low ed by 5 mL of a c id if ied mo-l ybdate , 10 mL of isobutanol saturated with deionized water,an d 1 0 mL of d eion ized w a ter sa tura ted w ith isobuta n ol .Th e sepa ra tory f u n n e l w a s sh a ken for 2 m in a n d a l low edto set t le . In t h i s process, m o l y b d e n u m complexed w i t h Pf

ions, and the phosphomolybdate complex was extracted intoth e isobuta n ol ph a se. A f t e r ph a se sepa ra t ion w a s c omplete ,th e more d en se a queous ph a se w a s d ra in ed from the bottomof the f u n n e l a n d saved fo r fu rt he r a n a ly sis . T h e isobuta n olp h a s e w a s w a s h e d b y s h a k i n g for 1 min w i t h 10 mL of 0.5M

H2SO4 sa tura ted w ith isobuta n ol a n d th e a queous ph a sed i s c a r d e d .T o d etermin e Pj in the isobuta n ol , 15 mL o f r e d u c i n g

a g en t w ith out moly bd a te w a s a d d ed to th e isobuta n ol ph a se ,shake n for 1 min, a l lowed to settle, a n d t h e colorless, aqueous

for 2 min , a l low ed to se t t le , a n d th e a queous l a y er sa vedfor P j and total P analysis. T h e Pj in both a queous a n disobuta n ol ph a ses w a s d etermin ed color i met r i ca l ly as de-scribed above.

Tota l P in th e a queous a n d isobuta n ol ph a ses w a s d eter-m i n e d after HCIO4-HNO3 digestion. A 5-mL a l iquot w a sa d d ed to a d ig est ion tube a lon g w ith 0.25-mL of sa tura tedMgCl2 (167 g MgCl2-6H2O i n 100 mL of d eion ized w a ter)to prevent P loss d urin g a c id d ig est ion (Brookes a n d Fowl-son, 1981). O n e mill i l i ter o f 6 M HNO3 and 8 mL of 1:1

HNC>3/rICl O 4 w ere a d d ed , th e sa mples w ere d ig ested in ablock digester, a n d total P w a s d etermin ed . Org a n ic P w a sc a lc u la ted a s th e d ifferen c e betw een tota l P a n d Pj .

T h e Pj in the original HCO3 extra c t w a s d etermin ed c ol -orimetric a l ly (Olsen et al., 1954). Tota l P w a s d etermin ed

8/2/2019 Artigo Fracionamento P Com Radioisotopo

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/artigo-fracionamento-p-com-radioisotopo 3/4

764 SOIL SCI. S O C . A M . J., VOL. 56, M A Y - J U N E 1992

Table 2. Recovery of inorganic (P ,) and organic P (P 0) fromH CO 3 s o l u t i o n s .

Phosphorus recovery

Extractionf P, + P.f P, + P 0#

P partitioningAcid molybdate:

P, in isobutanol (6) 24.2 ±P, in aqueous (7)P0 in aqueous (7)

W ithout acidifiedmolybdate:

Total P in aqueous(11)

Pi in aqueous (12)P0 in aqueous

(11 mi nus 12 )P, in isobutanol (9)P0 in isobutanol (9)

D irect analysis of H C O ,extractsTotal P (3)P I (4)P0 (3 minus 4)

m g P L-

0.40.0

NDft

0.0 9.1 ± 0.1 13.8 ± 0.10.0 0.0 0.0N D N D N D

24.3 ± 0.3 24.1 ± 0.3 24.0 ± 0.2 24.0 ± 0.1

23.2 ± 0.4 0.0 8.9 ± 0.1 13.6 ± 0.1

0.0 24.0 ± 0.3 15.0 ± 0.2 10.2 ± 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

24.3 ± 0.3 24.3 ± 0.3 24.2 ± 0.2 24.1 ± 0.124.0 ± 0.1 0.0 8.6 ± 0.1 13.7 ± 0.1

0.0 24.3 ± 0.3 15.6 ± 0.3 10.4 ± 0.1

t Total P in each case was 24 m g P L ~ * . N u m b e r s in parenthesesrefer tothe steps in Fig. 1.

t P, isK H 2PO 4-P .§ P0 is glycerophosphate-P.11 Original solution contained 9 mg P, L "

1+ 15 mg P0 L ~ ' .

# Original solution contained 1 4 m g P, L-' + 10 mg P0 L-1.

ttN ot determined because molybdate interfered with acid digestion.

Table 3. Recovery o f P in soil extracts by the i sobutanole x t r a c t i o n method.

Soil

E xtract iont C h a s eBenfield-

E ud ora Floren ce T ully

P partitioningA c i d molybdate:

P, in isobutanol (6)P, in aqueous (7)P0 in aqueous(7)

Without acidifiedmolybdate:Total P in aqueous

(11)P, in aqueous (12)P0 in aqueous

(11 minus 12)P, in isobutanol (9)P0 in isobutanol (9)

D irect analysis of HCO,extractsT ota l P (3)P I (4)P0 (3 minus 4)

m g P L -1

37.1 ± 0.60.0

51.7 ±36.3 ±

1.00.6

34.2 ± 0.3 12.2 ± 0.2 7.8 ± 0.10.0 0.0 0.0N D N D N D

41.6 ± 1.0 17.3 ± 0.6 24.3 ± 1.233.8 ± 0.3 12.6 ± 0.2 8.2 ± 0.1

15.4 ± 0.60.00.0

7.8 ± 0.70.00.0

4.7 ± 0.90.00.0

16.1 ± 1.20.00.0

51.0 ± 1.0 41.1 ± 1.0 18.0 ± 0.6 23.8 ± 1.236.3 ± 0.6 34.1 ± 0.3 12.6 ± 0.2 8.1 ± 0.114.7 ± 0.6 7.0 ± 0.7 5.4 ± 0.9 15.8 ± 1.2

t Num b ers in parentheses refer to the steps in Fig. 1 . P, = inorganic P; P0= organic P.

t N ot determined because molybdate interfered with acid digestion.

remain i n t h e aqueous phase because th e molybdateis not present to complex it . Indeed, al l of the P re-m ai n e d i n t h e aqueous phase a n d w a s recovered a s P;

(Table 2).W h e n Gly-P was extracted with acidified molyb-

date, n o Pj w a s detected i n t h e isobutanol (Table 2 ).A s discussed in more detail below, this indicates thatth e Gly-P d i d n o t hydrolyze during th e extraction. I nth e absence of acidified molybdate, all of the Gly-P

Cleavage of organic, phosphoester bonds by HCO3

or H2SO4 to convert P0 to P; would confound the re-sults. This possibility was tested by determining theformation of P; after (i ) incubating P0 in HCO3 orH2SO4 solutions and (ii) extracting solutions of or-

ganophosphates with isobutanol in the presence of aci-dified molybdate. Hydrolysis of the P0 to Pj w a s n o tobserved under a n y o f these conditions for AMP, CMP,Phy, or Gly-P, even after 16 h of incubation. How-

8/2/2019 Artigo Fracionamento P Com Radioisotopo

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/artigo-fracionamento-p-com-radioisotopo 4/4

N O T E S 765

eralization experiments. Although molybdate-catalyzed

hydrolysis of labile P0 compounds has been observed

(Marsh, 1959; Parvin and Smith, 1969), hydrolysis oflabile P0 was not observed for labile P0 compounds

except for ATP a f t e r long exposure periods.

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S

T h e a u t h o r s t h a n k D r . R . D a v i d J o n e s f or p r e l i m i n a r yr e s e a r c h , a n d Drs. J a n E. J^each a n d C h a r le s W . R i c e f ort h e i r cr i t ica l e val u at io n of t h i s s t u d y . T h i s s t u d y w a s sup-ported i n p a r t b y N a t i o n a l S c ie n c e F o u n d a t i o n LTER pro-g r a m , G r a n t no. BSR-8514 327.