ASBA - AZ HB2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 ASBA - AZ HB2011

    1/3

  • 8/9/2019 ASBA - AZ HB2011

    2/3

    Therehasalsobeentheclaimthatthesechangesweredoneunderacloudofsecrecy.Infact,thevastmajorityof the individual changesmade in thebilldid receive apublichearingandopportunity forpublic testimony

    duringthelegislativeprocess.Whatsmore,thesechangescametothesurpriseofnooneincludingtheAEA

    that had followed the legislative process and publicly contemplated by the Legislature for more than five

    months.

    Forallthesereasons,itiscriticalthatyoufamiliarizeyourselfwiththesechangesandunderstandhowtheywillimprove

    bothstudentsuccessandthefinancialwellbeingofyourdistrict.

    TENURE/SENIORITYRETENTION&RECALLCHANGE:Tenure(orseniority)cannotbeusedasadeterminingfactorforreductioninforceorretention.CHANGE: Inthecaseofarecallafterareduction in force,tenure(orseniority)doesnotneedtobeconsideredwhenchoosingwhichteacherstorecall.

    MYTH:Thisenablesschooldistrictstohaphazardlyfireteacherswhoareatthetopofthepayscalewithmanyyearsoexperience.Thisalsoviolatestheprincipleoflocalcontrol.

    FACT:Its

    in

    no

    ones

    best

    interest

    to

    let

    go

    effective

    teachers

    even

    if

    they

    are

    at

    the

    top

    of

    the

    pay

    scale.

    Highlyeffectiveteachersbenefitfromthesechanges.

    Thisisasteptowardsmorecomprehensiveandfairevaluationofteachers,whichwillfocusonteacherperformanceand

    effectiveness.Notonlydoesthisfurtherprofessionalizeteaching,itenablesgoverningboardstomakeprudentfinancia

    decisions thatputacademicachievementand theneedsof students first.Sensitivity isneeded indealingwith these

    issues; change of any kind is difficult, and this diminished role of tenure represents a significant cultural shift fo

    teachers.

    WhileASBAdidnot initiate theprohibition to senioritybeing taken intoaccount in retentionpolicies,ASBAactively

    supportedtheabilityofdistrictstoputstudentsfirstbygainingthisflexibilityinwhichdistrictscanstilltakeintoaccount

    overall teachingexperienceandexperience in teachingaparticular subjectwhenmakingdecisions thatbest suit the

    needsof

    their

    students.

    Further,

    these

    changes

    put

    Arizona

    at

    the

    forefront

    of

    the

    national

    reform

    movement

    and

    in

    a

    strongerpositiontoreceiveoneoftheRacestotheTopgrants.

    TENURE/SENIORITYSALARIESCHANGE:Ifsalaryreductionsarenecessary,districtscanchoosetoreducesalariesofsometenuredemployeesandnotothers;senioritycannotbeconsideredwhenmakingthischoice.

    MYTH:Thoseteachersatthetopofthepayscalewillhavetheirsalariesreducedfirstsodistrictscansavemoney.FACT:Districtsdonotwanttocutsalaries.Yet,Arizonaisfacingoneoftheworsteconomicrecessionsinhistory.Atthesame

    time,

    many

    districts

    are

    experiencing

    ashortage

    of

    quality

    teachers

    in

    math,

    science

    and

    special

    education,

    and

    theyneed the flexibility tomakeany reductions toensuredistrictsareable tokeep these teachers that specialize in

    highneed areas rather than be forced to impose a blanket salary reduction, regardless of teacher effectiveness o

    subjectareaexpertise.

    CONTRACTSCHANGE:Schooldistrictsmaydetermine thedate that theywilloffer teacherscontracts for thecomingyear. (IthadbeensetatApril15.)

  • 8/9/2019 ASBA - AZ HB2011

    3/3

    CHANGE:Schooldistrictsnowmayissueteachercontractsatanytime.(PreviouslyitwasrequiredtobedonebetweenMarch15andMay15.)

    MYTH:Teachershavelostjobsecurity.FACT: Teaching isaprofession,notjustajob.With theprofessionalization and respect teachersdeserve, there isaresponsibility indoingwhat it takes tohelp studentsachieve.Statemandatesarebeing replacedwith theabilityof

    locallyelectedgoverningboardstocreatedeadlinesfortheirowndistrictsandtomakeprudentfinancialdecisionsthat

    putacademic

    achievement

    and

    the

    needs

    of

    students

    first.

    TEACHERPERFORMANCECHANGE:Thetimeallowedforteacherswithinadequateperformancetomakeimprovementhasbeenshortenedfrom85workingdays(17instructionalweeks,almostonehalfyearoftheacademicyear)to60workingdays(12instructiona

    weeks,stillmorethananacademicquarter).

    CHANGE:Thetimeallowedforteacherswhohavebeendismissed forcausetorequestahearinghasbeenshortenedfrom30daysto10days.

    MYTH:Arizona

    doesnt

    care

    about

    teachers.

    FACT:Arizonacaresverymuchaboutourstudentsandwants todoeverythingpossible toensure themosteffectiveteachersare inour classrooms.Once again, this is a step forward inprofessionalizing teachers.A teacher that isnt

    performingmustbegiven thenoticeand time to improve;however, it isnotacceptable toallowanadultwho isnt

    performingtosacrificeastudentsfuture.

    ARIZONASCHOOLBOARDSASSOCIATIONQualityleadershipandadvocacyforchildreninpublicschools

    www.azsba.org