Upload
reginald-shelton
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cognitive Dissonance: Why oh why?
We like a product more if we pay for it than if it were free
We like a product more after we buy it We like our romantic partner more after we are
committed to the relationship We like someone more after we freely agree to do a
favor for that person… We can rationalize almost any behaviour…
Attitudes and Behaviour
Attitude: subjective evaluation of objects or persons in the world
Ex: political, racial, sports, consumer,… An especially important type of attitudes are those
about social groups Components of attitudes:
Affective: emotional reaction to object Behavioural: actions taken towards or because of
object Cognitive: beliefs about object
ABC of Attitudes Attitudes Sometimes Conflict with Other Powerful
Determinants of Behavior Attitudes predict behaviour when there is…
Accessibility: Ex, activating environmental attitude & voting for Kyoto protocol
Motivational relevance: Olympics vote & sports fans Constraints: circumstances, norms that limit the
expression of that attitude
Predicting Behavior From Attitudes
Attitudes are sometimes based on vague, secondhand information
Mismatched attitudes and actual attitude targets
o Death penaltyo Predicting use of birth control pills
Predicting Behavior From Attitudes
Attitudes are sometimes based on vague, secondhand information
Mismatched attitudes and actual attitude targets
“Automatic” Behavior that Bypasses Conscious Attitudes
Prime - a stimulus presented to mentally activate a concept temporarily, and hence make it accessible
Primes strongly influence behaviour
Bargh, Chen & Burrows (1996)Independent variable: Implicit activation of
“elderly” stereotype:• Bingo, Florida, wrinkle• vs. neutral words (chair, Minnesota, tree)
Dependent variable: walking speed
Primes are stronger predictors of behaviour than self-reported attitudes
Shariff & Norenzayan (2007)Reported belief in God (attitude)God prime (Divine, spirit, prophet, sacred
etc.) vs. neutral primeMeasure of generosity: how much of $10
offered to stranger?
median split by belief in God
top halfbottom half
Mean c
ash o
ffere
d
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Study 1: Belief in God. Difference is ns at p=.75. n=50.
Predicting Attitudes From Behavior
Cognitive Dissonance Theory (Festinger, 1957)
inconsistencies between a person’s thoughts, sentiments, and actions create an aversive emotional state (dissonance) that leads to efforts to restore consistency
Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive dissonance theory: attitude change can
occur as a result of an inconsistency between attitude and behaviour
People are motivated to maintain consistency in their beliefs and behaviours
When attitude is inconsistent with behaviour, people experience dissonance = discomfort
Dissonance can be reduced by 1) changing behaviour or 2) changing attitude
Predicting Attitudes From Behavior
Induced (forced) compliance - subtly compelling individuals to behave in a manner that is inconsistent with their beliefs, attitudes, or values, which typically leads to dissonance and to a change in their original attitudes to reduce their dissonance
Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) experiment on forced compliance
Effects of Induced Compliance
Smaller the amount, more attitude change!
Ss had to justify to themselves why they had to lie to other for so little money
“Spread of Alternatives” Study (Brehm, 1956)
• Aesop’s fox and the sour grapes
• Subjects rate desirability of potential items they could win
• Then they are given option to pick between two middle-range options with similar ratings
• They they are asked to rate them again
• Subjects significantly downgrade the rejected item!
Go Ahead, Rationalize. Monkeys Do It Too!
(Egan, Santos, & Bloom, 2007)
Monkeys show equal preferences
Monkeys choose Red OR Blue (say chose Red, rejected Blue)
Critical Test: which one would Monkeys choose? Blue OR Green?
Results
4-y. o. children choosing stickers Amnesiacs (impaired short term memories)
choosing paintings Suggests rationalization is quite basic and
may not need conscious reflection
Fig. 3. Mean % of choices of novel but equally preferred option (C) in the choice and no-choice conditions
Predicting Attitudes From Behavior
Effort Justification - tendency to reduce dissonance by finding reasons for why you have devoted time, effort, or money for something that turned out to be disappointing
Aronson and Mills (1959) ‘initiation experiment’
Self-Perception Theory
self-perception theory - people come to know their own attitudes by looking at their behavior and the context in which it occurred and inferring what their attitudes must be
No discomfort or arousal
Cognitive Dissonance: Arousal
If cognitive dissonance is aversive, it should be accompanied by a high arousal level
Anti-attitudinal essay study Subjects were induced to write essays contrary to
their attitudes Free choice group vs. no-choice group Which group should change attitude more? Which group should experience more arousal?
Predicting Attitudes From Behavior
Self-Affirmation and Dissonance
self-affirmation theory - taking stock of one’s good qualities and core values, which can help a person cope with threats to self-esteem (and eliminate feelings of dissonance)
Steele (1988) study of science vs. business majors