-
w w w . d w e l l i n g . n l
architecture& dwelling
C h a i r o f
msC 1 studio reset/restore
s t u d e n tw o r k
f a l l 2 0 1 1
-
C o l o f o n
TU DelftChair of Architecture & Dwellingwww.dwelling.nl
General Coordinator MSc 1/2 Pierijn van der Putt
[email protected]
Tutor and Studio Coordinator Reset/Restore Olv Klijn
[email protected]
Guest TeacherCaro van de Venne
Building Technology TeacherHans Karsen
Visiting CriticsDick van GamerenOana Rades
Graphic DesignRobbert Guis
All images by dwelling students
-
r e s e t / r e s to r e m s C 1 / 2 s t u d i o
The design studio Reset/Restore investigates new possibilities
for a quintessential relic of post-war housing in the Netherlands:
the Bijlmerflat Kleiburg.
Every large European city exhibits examples of large scale
post-war housing estates. Many of these have been designed
according to then-prevalent modern visions of the housing
neighborhood of the future. Living, working, leisure and traffic
were often radically separated. As a result, huge structures for
dwelling and infrastructure are situated within large scale green
areas or leisurescapes.
Now more then 50 years old, many of these estates suffer immense
problems. Not only are the buildings technically defunct, also the
needs of the inhabitants have changed drastically. Many projects
are awaiting the wrecking ball. However, from the viewpoint of
cultural history, society and even sustainability, demolition is
problematic.When housing corporation Rochdale announced it would
demolish Kleiburg, several institutions protested strongly. It was
argued that the building is an important part of the cityscape and
that it is to be valued as a symbol of its underlying social
ideals. On the other hand, it would cost Rochdale millions to reuse
Kleiburg, money it could invest more safely somewhere
else.Reset/Restore sets out to develop new strategies that reach
further than renovation of what is already there, or consolidation
from a purely cultural vantage point. By making use of the existing
building, new possibilities for this mastodon will be extensively
explored.
-
Jon garbizumathi Js de krakermaartJe mei Js
the bi Jlmer burger
-
The Bijlmer BurgerThere may be various ways of improving the
Bijlmer-meer. It is a fact that it does not work as it was
ex-pected. It may be the monotonous and massive con-crete
buildings, the huge and unequiped green areas, the lack of
facilities... We first tried to understand How the area works in
urban ways. We just realized that the Bijlmer does not work as it
was intended first. It has no more the sistemacity that had in his
origin. Nowadays it has 'context'; in some ways the alterations
that had been done during the last 30 years have improved the
potencial of the original High rise. The Bijlmer is not anymore
high rise in the park.
Then we analized the potencial of the horizontal main streets on
both sides of the Area. In this streets is focused most of the
activity of the neighbourhood (Shopping center, metro stations,
religious buildings, markets...) So we can say that the High rises
in some ways are hanging from this streets. Then a logical idea
would be to densify this streets. Give more people and more
activity to this areas.
By densifying the areas close to the street we also define a
diference in the homogenous green space. The spaces close to the
street are nomore green areas but activity spaces where you can
find different facilities. Then, the green area gets condensed,
contracted. It is also logical that if we densify the border of
this green areas the are more likely to work better. So we can
state that the global idea is a logical secuence from the most
urban and densify street to the most wild and free green park. This
secuence can be divided in 4 different levels.
The first level would be the urban street. We build new medium
rise buildings Which not only provides us more den-sity but shops
and local business spots, integrated car park underneath these
buildings and more close and active urban spaces (street).
The second level would be the square. Is usually the big squares
next to the street. We place there the main facili-ties like
theatres, daycare center, communitary centers... This is also an
interaction point for the people living in the high rise.
The third level is the enclave. In some areas the high rises
interacts with the low rises that surrounds the bijlmer area. This
creates urban enclaves protected by the high rise and which create
a filter between the urban and the green areas,
The last part would be the green park. We understand the park as
a virgin and wild green area that should be used for leisure and
green energy production. we erase most of the original paths in the
park and just create a network of straight paths for pedestrians
and bicycles. And we create a system of leisure facilities
underneath the metroline connected by a walkway.
We can then say that the general idea is how the high rises
(Kleiburg in our case) answers to their context. We contex-tualize
the high rise. Not only interacting with the su-rroundings but also
generating different ways of living. From the most urban and active
apartment or student house to the most self sustainable, natural
and experi-mental way of living in the park.
high density business development
medium density urban densification
urban active interaction spaces
urban enclave
low rise invaders
wild and virgin green corridor
-
The Bijlmer BurgerThere may be various ways of improving the
Bijlmer-meer. It is a fact that it does not work as it was
ex-pected. It may be the monotonous and massive con-crete
buildings, the huge and unequiped green areas, the lack of
facilities... We first tried to understand How the area works in
urban ways. We just realized that the Bijlmer does not work as it
was intended first. It has no more the sistemacity that had in his
origin. Nowadays it has 'context'; in some ways the alterations
that had been done during the last 30 years have improved the
potencial of the original High rise. The Bijlmer is not anymore
high rise in the park.
Then we analized the potencial of the horizontal main streets on
both sides of the Area. In this streets is focused most of the
activity of the neighbourhood (Shopping center, metro stations,
religious buildings, markets...) So we can say that the High rises
in some ways are hanging from this streets. Then a logical idea
would be to densify this streets. Give more people and more
activity to this areas.
By densifying the areas close to the street we also define a
diference in the homogenous green space. The spaces close to the
street are nomore green areas but activity spaces where you can
find different facilities. Then, the green area gets condensed,
contracted. It is also logical that if we densify the border of
this green areas the are more likely to work better. So we can
state that the global idea is a logical secuence from the most
urban and densify street to the most wild and free green park. This
secuence can be divided in 4 different levels.
The first level would be the urban street. We build new medium
rise buildings Which not only provides us more den-sity but shops
and local business spots, integrated car park underneath these
buildings and more close and active urban spaces (street).
The second level would be the square. Is usually the big squares
next to the street. We place there the main facili-ties like
theatres, daycare center, communitary centers... This is also an
interaction point for the people living in the high rise.
The third level is the enclave. In some areas the high rises
interacts with the low rises that surrounds the bijlmer area. This
creates urban enclaves protected by the high rise and which create
a filter between the urban and the green areas,
The last part would be the green park. We understand the park as
a virgin and wild green area that should be used for leisure and
green energy production. we erase most of the original paths in the
park and just create a network of straight paths for pedestrians
and bicycles. And we create a system of leisure facilities
underneath the metroline connected by a walkway.
We can then say that the general idea is how the high rises
(Kleiburg in our case) answers to their context. We contex-tualize
the high rise. Not only interacting with the su-rroundings but also
generating different ways of living. From the most urban and active
apartment or student house to the most self sustainable, natural
and experi-mental way of living in the park.
high density business development
medium density urban densification
urban active interaction spaces
urban enclave
low rise invaders
wild and virgin green corridor
The Bijlmer BurgerThere may be various ways of improving the
Bijlmer-meer. It is a fact that it does not work as it was
ex-pected. It may be the monotonous and massive con-crete
buildings, the huge and unequiped green areas, the lack of
facilities... We first tried to understand How the area works in
urban ways. We just realized that the Bijlmer does not work as it
was intended first. It has no more the sistemacity that had in his
origin. Nowadays it has 'context'; in some ways the alterations
that had been done during the last 30 years have improved the
potencial of the original High rise. The Bijlmer is not anymore
high rise in the park.
Then we analized the potencial of the horizontal main streets on
both sides of the Area. In this streets is focused most of the
activity of the neighbourhood (Shopping center, metro stations,
religious buildings, markets...) So we can say that the High rises
in some ways are hanging from this streets. Then a logical idea
would be to densify this streets. Give more people and more
activity to this areas.
By densifying the areas close to the street we also define a
diference in the homogenous green space. The spaces close to the
street are nomore green areas but activity spaces where you can
find different facilities. Then, the green area gets condensed,
contracted. It is also logical that if we densify the border of
this green areas the are more likely to work better. So we can
state that the global idea is a logical secuence from the most
urban and densify street to the most wild and free green park. This
secuence can be divided in 4 different levels.
The first level would be the urban street. We build new medium
rise buildings Which not only provides us more den-sity but shops
and local business spots, integrated car park underneath these
buildings and more close and active urban spaces (street).
The second level would be the square. Is usually the big squares
next to the street. We place there the main facili-ties like
theatres, daycare center, communitary centers... This is also an
interaction point for the people living in the high rise.
The third level is the enclave. In some areas the high rises
interacts with the low rises that surrounds the bijlmer area. This
creates urban enclaves protected by the high rise and which create
a filter between the urban and the green areas,
The last part would be the green park. We understand the park as
a virgin and wild green area that should be used for leisure and
green energy production. we erase most of the original paths in the
park and just create a network of straight paths for pedestrians
and bicycles. And we create a system of leisure facilities
underneath the metroline connected by a walkway.
We can then say that the general idea is how the high rises
(Kleiburg in our case) answers to their context. We contex-tualize
the high rise. Not only interacting with the su-rroundings but also
generating different ways of living. From the most urban and active
apartment or student house to the most self sustainable, natural
and experi-mental way of living in the park.
high density business development
medium density urban densification
urban active interaction spaces
urban enclave
low rise invaders
wild and virgin green corridor
-
There may be various ways of improving the Bijlmermeer.It is a
fact that it does not work as it was expected. It may be the
monotonous and massive concrete buildings, the huge and unequiped
green areas, the lack of facilities... We first tried to understand
How the area works in urban ways. We just realized that the Bijlmer
does not work as it was intendedfirst. It has no more the
sistemacity that had in his origin. Nowadays it has 'context'; in
some ways the alterations that had been done during the last 30
years have improved the potencial of the original High rise. The
Bijlmer is not anymore high rise in the park.
Then we analized the potencial of the horizontal mainstreets on
both sides of the Area. In this streets is focused most of the
activity of the neighbourhood (Shopping center, metro stations,
religious buildings, markets...) So we can say that the High rises
in some ways are hanging from this streets. Then a logical idea
would be to densify this streets. Give morepeople and more activity
to this areas. By densifying the areas close to the street we also
define a diference in the homogenous green space. The spaces close
to the street are nomore green areas but activity spaces where you
can find different facilities. Then, the green area gets condensed,
contracted. It is also logical that if we densify the border of
this green areas the are more likely to work better. So we can
state that the global idea is a logical secuence from the most
urban and densify street to the most wild and free green park. This
secuence can be divided in 4 different levels. The first level
would be the urban street. We build new medium rise buildings Which
not only provides us more density but shops and local
business spots, integrated car park underneath these buildings
and more close and activeurban spaces (street).
The second level would be the square. Is usually the bigsquares
next to the street. We place there the main facilitieslike
theatres, daycare center, communitary centers...This is also an
interaction point for the people living in thehigh rise.
The third level is the enclave. In some areas the high
risesinteracts with the low rises that surrounds the bijlmerarea.
This creates urban enclaves protected by the highrise and which
create a filter between the urban and thegreen areas,
The last part would be the green park. We understand thepark as
a virgin and wild green area that should be usedfor leisure and
green energy production. we erase most ofthe original paths in the
park and just create a network ofstraight paths for pedestrians and
bicycles. And we createa system of leisure facilities underneath
the metrolineconnected by a walkway.We can then say that the
general idea is how the high rises(Kleiburg in our case) answers to
their context. We contextualize the high rise. Not only interacting
with the surroundings but also generating different ways of
living.From the most urban and active apartment or studenthouse to
the most self sustainable, natural and experimentalway of living in
the park.
-
new typologies
-
interventionthe balCony
-
interventionthe gallery
-
pietro pizzirobbert guisdavey van giesen
honey, i am home
-
By demolishing all the other flats, it has also been demolished
the structure of the designed urban space. The remaining buildings
of the Bijlmer Museum are just a sad fragment of the originary
plan
demolishing urban struCture
original struCture is demolished
no Clear boundaries / Chaos
undefined publiC spaCe
We assist to a toal lack of identity of the public space, no
functions are recognizable for the potential usersl the space
itself, in its extreme vagueness, doesnt allow it.
unreCognizable publiC park
no Clear ConneCtions
unreCognizable street
The street, in all its identities, paradigma of the public, of
the random encounter, is missing in the Bijlmer Museum. The maze of
paths and pathways in the green, the flatness of the corridors
enhance the feeling of isolation
Corridors dont feel l ike a street
problemsloCked trees
The biggest quality of living in the bijlmer are the amazing
trees. By keeping them as a monument, the natural sense of the
bijlmer will be exist. It has to be like living in the wood
-
inside/outside ConneC-tions
a bad connection between the inside and outside (balconies and
corridors) of the living space doesnt connect properly the dweller
with the outer space. The dweller doesnt feel like he is part of a
sysytem, he is not involved
monotone faC ade, laCk of usable spaCe
worn out typologies
The aged typologies cannot work anymore. They had been designed
for a certain type of people that never existed, they cannot
support the needs of a modern city dweller, these are not flexible
types
non flexible dwelling standard
human to human
Little interaction between different group types derives also
from the lack of proper collective functions and spaces. Different
cultures have troubles to activate a shared way of living thus the
lack of communication
empty shell
-
loCked trees
urban enClaves
new ConneCtions
The lack of recognizable streets and pathways is one of the
biggest problem in the Bijlmer. Straight paths to specific
destinations will bring more clarity. The new pathways will also
connect the different parts of the bijlmermuseum, which are now
like islands in the sea
The demolished structure of the original bijlmer has to be
restored. The scale of all the public spaces and the lack of
identity will be saved by urban enclaves. Each enclaves can have
there own program and activities.
The biggest quality of living in the bijlmer are the amazing
trees. By keeping them as a monument, the natural sense of the
bijlmer will be exist. It has to be like living in the wood
masterplan
-
urban enClave
-
entranCes
-
paul mulderdominika l inowskasuzanne weeda
reboot/resC ale
-
1:2000 SITE PLAN, NEIGHBOURHOOD DIVISIONS
N
Accessible Bijlmer museum Public functions
Self-sufficient neighborhoods
3 neighbourhoods Connecting roads Extending building Permeable
Permeable groundfloor
Green axis
Open plinth
Streetpatern Karspeldreef
live
s e r v i c e
LayersElevated green
REBOOT/ RESCALE
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA
PAUL MULDER
SUZANNA WEEDA
1:2000 SITE PLAN, NEIGHBOURHOOD DIVISIONS
N
Accessible Bijlmer museum Public functions
Self-sufficient neighborhoods
3 neighbourhoods Connecting roads Extending building Permeable
Permeable groundfloor
Green axis
Open plinth
Streetpatern Karspeldreef
live
s e r v i c e
LayersElevated green
REBOOT/ RESCALE
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA
PAUL MULDER
SUZANNA WEEDA
1:2000 SITE PLAN, NEIGHBOURHOOD DIVISIONS
N
Accessible Bijlmer museum Public functions
Self-sufficient neighborhoods
3 neighbourhoods Connecting roads Extending building Permeable
Permeable groundfloor
Green axis
Open plinth
Streetpatern Karspeldreef
live
s e r v i c e
LayersElevated green
REBOOT/ RESCALE
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA
PAUL MULDER
SUZANNA WEEDA
1:2000 SITE PLAN, NEIGHBOURHOOD DIVISIONS
N
Accessible Bijlmer museum Public functions
Self-sufficient neighborhoods
3 neighbourhoods Connecting roads Extending building Permeable
Permeable groundfloor
Green axis
Open plinth
Streetpatern Karspeldreef
live
s e r v i c e
LayersElevated green
REBOOT/ RESCALE
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA
PAUL MULDER
SUZANNA WEEDA
masterplan
-
cafe
lunch diner
community center
storage
bakery
office
print shop
drycleaners
office
office
hair salon
flower shop
fruit + veggie
barber shop
used bookshop
vintage clothing
convenience store
fast food
insurance
bank
health clinic
pharmacy
school / daycare
storage
mini grocery
office
office
M
P P
+600
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+1200
+1800
N
1:500 SITUATIONAL PLAN
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA PAUL MULDER SUZANNA WEEDA
C C
A
A
B
B
1:2000 SITE PLAN, NEIGHBOURHOOD DIVISIONS
N
Accessible Bijlmer museum Public functions
Self-sufficient neighborhoods
3 neighbourhoods Connecting roads Extending building Permeable
Permeable groundfloor
Green axis
Open plinth
Streetpatern Karspeldreef
live
s e r v i c e
LayersElevated green
REBOOT/ RESCALE
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA
PAUL MULDER
SUZANNA WEEDA
1:2000 SITE PLAN, NEIGHBOURHOOD DIVISIONS
N
Accessible Bijlmer museum Public functions
Self-sufficient neighborhoods
3 neighbourhoods Connecting roads Extending building Permeable
Permeable groundfloor
Green axis
Open plinth
Streetpatern Karspeldreef
live
s e r v i c e
LayersElevated green
REBOOT/ RESCALE
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA
PAUL MULDER
SUZANNA WEEDA
urban plan
-
cafe
lunch diner
community center
storage
bakery
office
print shop
drycleaners
office
office
hair salon
flower shop
fruit + veggie
barber shop
used bookshop
vintage clothing
convenience store
fast food
insurance
bank
health clinic
pharmacy
school / daycare
storage
mini grocery
office
office
M
P P
+600
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+600
+1200
+1800
N
1:500 SITUATIONAL PLAN
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA PAUL MULDER SUZANNA WEEDA
C C
A
A
B
B
-
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA PAUL MULDER SUZANNA WEEDA
+2
+6
+7
+2
+6
+7
+2
+2
SECTION A-A 1:100
SECTION B-B 1:100
SECTION C-C 1:100
-
1 m 8 m
5 m
3 m
1 m
12 m
6 m
9 m
IPE 180 prole with rockwool insulationplasterboard18 mm
compressed acoustic insulationwall nish (personal)
wooden facade elementsliding door window frameprotective
railing
compressed insulation18mm multiplexIPE 180 with stonewool
inbetweenstonewool insulationcompressed insulationplaster
wooden frameinsulationthermal barrierC prolewooden cover
wooden frame to set windowframewindow fram of sliding door
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA PAUL MULDER SUZANNA WEEDA
LEVEL 7 1:100
CROSS SECTION OF DWELLING 1:50 WITH INDICATION OF THE
DETAILS
C
K
C
WEEKDAY SCENARIO
WEEKEND SCENARIO
1:20 NORTH ELEVATION1:20 VERTICAL SECTION
1:5 HORIZONTAL DETAIL C
1:5 VERTICAL DETAIL C1:20 HORIZONTAL SECTION
G
H
L
C
B
C
FRAGMENT A
LEVEL 6 1:100
1:50
DWELLING SCHEME
1 m 8 m
5 m
3 m
1 m
12 m
6 m
9 m
IPE 180 prole with rockwool insulationplasterboard18 mm
compressed acoustic insulationwall nish (personal)
wooden facade elementsliding door window frameprotective
railing
compressed insulation18mm multiplexIPE 180 with stonewool
inbetweenstonewool insulationcompressed insulationplaster
wooden frameinsulationthermal barrierC prolewooden cover
wooden frame to set windowframewindow fram of sliding door
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA PAUL MULDER SUZANNA WEEDA
LEVEL 7 1:100
CROSS SECTION OF DWELLING 1:50 WITH INDICATION OF THE
DETAILS
C
K
C
WEEKDAY SCENARIO
WEEKEND SCENARIO
1:20 NORTH ELEVATION1:20 VERTICAL SECTION
1:5 HORIZONTAL DETAIL C
1:5 VERTICAL DETAIL C1:20 HORIZONTAL SECTION
G
H
L
C
B
C
FRAGMENT A
LEVEL 6 1:100
1:50
DWELLING SCHEME
-
2 m2
9 m2
22 m2
14 m2
14 m2
18.5 m2
18.5 m2
3.5 m2
9 m2
DOMINIKA LINOWSKA PAUL MULDER SUZANNA WEEDA
LEVEL 7 1:100
1:20 WEST ELEVATION
1:20 HORIZONTAL SECTION
1:20 VERTICAL SECTION THROUGH MAISONETTE
1:5 DETAIL D 1:5 DETAIL E
E
BG
E
HI
M
H
BG
BG
H
FRAGMENT B
1:50
LEVEL 6 1:100
DWELLING SCHEMECROSS SECTION OF DWELLING 1:50 WITH INDICATION OF
THE DETAILS
-
live
s e r v i c e
-
arthur eeuwiJkevert drui Jfwing yung
i want to live there too!
-
masterplan
15min to A
msterdam
The plinth of Kleiburg w
ill be filled w
ith ground-based dw
ellings. Ideal for fa- milies w
ith young kids
The outdoor space of the dw
ellings can be very dierent. This results in a vibrant atm
os-phere and faade
Kleiburg has a great accesibility to the nearest m
etro station KraaiennestBasisvoorzieningen
Overige voorzieningen
Sfeer (ontmoetingsplek)
Groen
Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
BasisvoorzieningenOverige voorzieningen
Groen
Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teAantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
BasisvoorzieningenOverige voorzieningen
Groen
Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teAantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Basisvoorzieningen
Uitstraling gebouw
en
BasisvoorzieningenOverige voorzieningen
Groen
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teAantal kam
ers
23
5
Basisvoorzieningen
Uitstraling gebouw
en
Financiele instellingen
Gezondheids-/welzijnszorg
Advisering en onderzoek
Advisering en onderzoek
Informatie en communicatie
Overige fincanciele dienstverlening
Horeca
Onderwijs
Overheid
Handel
N
Main anchor point
Slow
circling route
Secondair anchor
pointOutdoor space
Num
ber of rooms
Floor spaceAppearance of the dw
elling
scale 1:500
-
15min to A
msterdam
The plinth of Kleiburg w
ill be filled w
ith ground-based dw
ellings. Ideal for fa- milies w
ith young kids
The outdoor space of the dw
ellings can be very dierent. This results in a vibrant atm
os-phere and faade
Kleiburg has a great accesibility to the nearest m
etro station KraaiennestBasisvoorzieningen
Overige voorzieningen
Sfeer (ontmoetingsplek)
Groen
Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
BasisvoorzieningenOverige voorzieningen
Groen
Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teAantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
BasisvoorzieningenOverige voorzieningen
Groen
Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teAantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teUitstraling gebouw
Aantal kam
ersWoning oppervlakte
23
5
Basisvoorzieningen
Uitstraling gebouw
en
BasisvoorzieningenOverige voorzieningen
Groen
Uitstraling gebouw
enBuiten ruim
teAantal kam
ers
23
5
Basisvoorzieningen
Uitstraling gebouw
en
Financiele instellingen
Gezondheids-/welzijnszorg
Advisering en onderzoek
Advisering en onderzoek
Informatie en communicatie
Overige fincanciele dienstverlening
Horeca
Onderwijs
Overheid
Handel
N
Main anchor point
Slow
circling route
Secondair anchor
pointOutdoor space
Num
ber of rooms
Floor spaceAppearance of the dw
elling
scale 1:500
-
urban planWhat are their wishes?
Basisvoorzieningen Overige voorzieningen Sfeer
(ontmoetingsplek)Groen Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouwen Buiten ruimte Uitstraling gebouwAantal
kamers Woning oppervlakte
2 3 5
Basisvoorzieningen Overige voorzieningen Sfeer
(ontmoetingsplek)Groen Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouwen Buiten ruimte Uitstraling gebouwAantal
kamers Woning oppervlakte
2 3 5
basic services within walking distance
divers character of surrounding buildings
other services (restaurants, bars)
Personal garden/ outdoor space
green spaces
suitable number of rooms
good accessibility
desired dwellingsize
liveliness and encouter
design of the building
-
What are their wishes?
Basisvoorzieningen Overige voorzieningen Sfeer
(ontmoetingsplek)Groen Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouwen Buiten ruimte Uitstraling gebouwAantal
kamers Woning oppervlakte
2 3 5
Basisvoorzieningen Overige voorzieningen Sfeer
(ontmoetingsplek)Groen Bereikbaarheid
Uitstraling gebouwen Buiten ruimte Uitstraling gebouwAantal
kamers Woning oppervlakte
2 3 5
basic services within walking distance
divers character of surrounding buildings
other services (restaurants, bars)
Personal garden/ outdoor space
green spaces
suitable number of rooms
good accessibility
desired dwellingsize
liveliness and encouter
design of the building
-
interventions
-
Interventions:
GREENHOUSE
Interventions:
MIDDLE
Interventions:
VIEWPORT
-
GREENHOUSE
signif iC ant dwelling
-
Significant dwelling
GREENHOUSE
-
The sun will heat up the air
heat exchanger
WARMCOLD
AQUIFER
Natural ventilation
Windows for ventilation
WINTER
Heat energie out of the warm air, will be stored in the
aquifer
heat exchanger
Warm water can be used to warm the dwellings
heat exchanger
WARMCOLD
AQUIFER
Natural ventilation
Windows for ventilation
Sun shading, to prevent overheating
SUMMER
Heat energie out of the warm air, will be stored in the
aquifer
heat exchanger
Cold water can be used to cool the dwellings
Climate:
GREENHOUSE
Climate
The sun will heat up the air
heat exchanger
WARMCOLD
AQUIFER
Natural ventilation
Windows for ventilation
WINTER
Heat energie out of the warm air, will be stored in the
aquifer
heat exchanger
Warm water can be used to warm the dwellings
heat exchanger
WARMCOLD
AQUIFER
Natural ventilation
Windows for ventilation
Sun shading, to prevent overheating
SUMMER
Heat energie out of the warm air, will be stored in the
aquifer
heat exchanger
Cold water can be used to cool the dwellings
Climate:
GREENHOUSE
-
I WANT TO LIVE THERE TOO !!DWELLING STUDIO BIJLMER, FINAL
PRESENTATION 13-01-2012
Arthur Eeuwijk 1558943, Evert Druijff 4110765, Wing Yung
1303686
IMPRESSION
HORIZONTAL SECTION - Scale 1:20
DETAILS - Scale 1:5
ELEVATION - Scale 1:20 VERTICAL SECTION - Scale 1:20
-
I WANT TO LIVE THERE TOO !!DWELLING STUDIO BIJLMER, FINAL
PRESENTATION 13-01-2012
Arthur Eeuwijk 1558943, Evert Druijff 4110765, Wing Yung
1303686
IMPRESSION
HORIZONTAL SECTION - Scale 1:20
DETAILS - Scale 1:5
ELEVATION - Scale 1:20 VERTICAL SECTION - Scale 1:20
-
marCel klaverlily ronenmyrthe van voskui Jlen
resC ale
-
masterplan
-
Reset - Rescale - Restore
Shops 210 Lofts
Daycare
510 Studios
160 Family dwe
llings
Community center, gallery and sport center
120 Penthouses
1
37
41
N
Masterplan 1:2000
Situation 1:500
N
Shops
Daycare
Community center
Art gallery
Sport center
Circulation system
Bike storage
Storages
Praktice room, dwelling
Transhipment area
Program
Marcel Klaver - 1392840 - Lily Ronen - 1286137 - Myrthe van
Voskuijlen - 4109589
Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 - 10 Level 11 - 13
-
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
+3.00
+5.80
+8.60
+11.40
+14.20
+17.00
+19.80
+22.60
+25.40
+28.20
+31.00
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Heating:- Radiator- convector
Natural ventilation:
Sun Shading:
Climate:
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
+3.0+0.0
+0.0
+0.0
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
Level 0Floorplans 1 : 100
Marcel Klaver1392840
Level 1 Level 6 Level 7
Section 1 : 100
ConstructionDiagrams Climate
Existing structure:
- Reusing Consoles- Removing Gallerys (Low F-value: survey done
by Adviesburo Nieman BV)
Storage spaceVertical access
Raised level for Parking+ 3.00 m
Total dwelling count:
Direct entrance from deck: 21 dwellingsUpper levels (>+2):
148
Entrances to upper levels
Entrance to semi-public level
1.
2.
3.4.5.
6.
1. Park/ Public domain
2. Semi- Public domain
3. Semi- Collective domain
4. Collective domain 1
5. Collective domain 2
6. Private domain
masterplan
-
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
+3.00
+5.80
+8.60
+11.40
+14.20
+17.00
+19.80
+22.60
+25.40
+28.20
+31.00
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Heating:- Radiator- convector
Natural ventilation:
Sun Shading:
Climate:
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
+3.0+0.0
+0.0
+0.0
7161
5112
0291
8141
3121
1101
Level 0Floorplans 1 : 100
Marcel Klaver1392840
Level 1 Level 6 Level 7
Section 1 : 100
ConstructionDiagrams Climate
Existing structure:
- Reusing Consoles- Removing Gallerys (Low F-value: survey done
by Adviesburo Nieman BV)
Storage spaceVertical access
Raised level for Parking+ 3.00 m
Total dwelling count:
Direct entrance from deck: 21 dwellingsUpper levels (>+2):
148
Entrances to upper levels
Entrance to semi-public level
1.
2.
3.4.5.
6.
1. Park/ Public domain
2. Semi- Public domain
3. Semi- Collective domain
4. Collective domain 1
5. Collective domain 2
6. Private domain
-
urban interior
-
Basic dwelling unit
Configuration 1Small dwelling with balcony
Configuration 2Large dwelling with balcony
Configuration 3Small dwelling with extra room
Configuration 4Large dwelling with extra room
Configuration 5Small dwelling with separation
Configuration 7Small dwelling with open living
Configuration 8Large dwelling with open living
Art gallery
Configuration 6Large dwelling with separation
Penthouses level 11-13
Section A-A Section B-B
New ground level
A
A
B
B
1:100 Building Fragment by Myrthe van Voskuijlen - 4109589
N
1:200 Building Technology Principles by Myrthe van Voskuijlen -
4109589
+3.00
+5.65
+29.50
+30.70
+34.00
+37.30
+40.60
Disks
Stab
ility wa
lls
Disks
Roof plan (in between penthouses and old building)
Basement plan
Disks planSectionService room
Storages
Bike storage
Natural ventilation
Mechanical extraction
Floor heating
Radiator
Sun shading
Open glass facade
Service room
3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.902.90 2.90 2.903.90 2.90 2.90 3.903.90
2.90 2.90N
-
Basic dwelling unit
Configuration 1Small dwelling with balcony
Configuration 2Large dwelling with balcony
Configuration 3Small dwelling with extra room
Configuration 4Large dwelling with extra room
Configuration 5Small dwelling with separation
Configuration 7Small dwelling with open living
Configuration 8Large dwelling with open living
Art gallery
Configuration 6Large dwelling with separation
Penthouses level 11-13
Section A-A Section B-B
New ground level
A
A
B
B
1:100 Building Fragment by Myrthe van Voskuijlen - 4109589
N
1:200 Building Technology Principles by Myrthe van Voskuijlen -
4109589
+3.00
+5.65
+29.50
+30.70
+34.00
+37.30
+40.60
Disks
Stab
ility wa
lls
Disks
Roof plan (in between penthouses and old building)
Basement plan
Disks planSectionService room
Storages
Bike storage
Natural ventilation
Mechanical extraction
Floor heating
Radiator
Sun shading
Open glass facade
Service room
3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.902.90 2.90 2.903.90 2.90 2.90 3.903.90
2.90 2.90N
-
interior
-
w w w . d w e l l i n g . n l
architecture& dwelling
C h a i r o f
