Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    1/21

    TASK DESIGNING IN PROCESORIENTED PERFORMANCES

    BASED ASSESSMENT

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    2/21

    OBJECTIVE

    a. to identify the steps indesigning a task;

    b. to distinguish performanceobjectives in the cognitivedomain from performance

    objectives in the affective andsocial domain

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    3/21

    Task Designing ( Santos)

    Standards for designing a task

    1. Identifying an activity thatwould highlight thecompetencies to be evaluated.

    2. Identifying an activity thatwould entail more or less thesame sets of competencies.

    3. Finding a task that would beinteresting and enjoyable forthe students.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    4/21

    Example Topic:

    Understanding biological diversity Possible Task Design

    Bring the students to the pond or creek

    Ask them to find all living organisms nearthe pond or creek

    Bring them to school playground to find asmay living organisms they can find

    Observe how the students will develop asystem for finding such organisms,classifying the organisms and concluding thedifferences in biological diversity of thetwo sites.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    5/21

    Step 1. Deciding What to Test

    to create a list of objectivesthat specifies the knowledge,

    skills, habits of mind, and

    indicators of the outcomes

    that will be the focus ofinstruction.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    6/21

    Three general questions to askwhen deciding what to teach: What knowledge or content is

    essential for learner understanding ofthe subject matter?

    What intellectual skills are necessaryfor the learner to use this knowledgeor content?

    What habits of mind are important forthe learner to successfully performwith this knowledge or content?

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    7/21

    Performance objective in theCognitive Domain

    Example

    Draw a physical map of NorthAmerica from memory and locate 10

    cities.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    8/21

    Skills in acquiringinformation

    Skills in organizing andusing information

    Communicating: explainingModeling

    DemonstratingGraphingDisplayingWriting

    AdvisingProgrammingProposingdrawing

    Organizing: classifying categorizing

    SortingOrderingRankingArranging

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    9/21

    Measuring: Problem Solving:

    countingAppraisingWeighingBalancing

    Estimating

    Investigating:gathering referencesInterviewingExperimenting

    Stating questionsIdentifying problemsInterpretingMonitoring

    Decision making:evaluatingChoosing elicitingadopting

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    10/21

    Sample objectives:

    1. Draw a physical map of NorthAmerica from memory and locate 10cities.

    2. Describe two alternatives ways tosolve mathematics word problem

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    11/21

    Performance Objective in theAffective and Social Domain

    performance assessment not onlyrequire curriculum to teach thinking skillsbut also to develop positive dispositions

    and habits of mind.

    Performance test are ideal vehicles for

    assessing habits of mind and social skills,ex. cooperation, sharing and negotiation

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    12/21

    Step:2 Designing the Assessment Context

    -create a task, simulation, or situationthat will allow learners to

    demonstrate the knowledge, skills,and attitudes that they haveacquired.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    13/21

    Example: The social studies performancetest ( adapted form Wiggins, 1992)

    You and several travel agent colleagueshave been assigned the responsibility ofdesigning a trip to China for 12 to 14-year-

    olds. Prepare an extensive brochure for amonth-long cultural exchange trip. Includeitinerary, modes of transportation, costs,suggested budget, clothing, health

    considerations, areas of cultural sensitivity,language considerations, and otherinformation necessary for a family to decide ifthey want their child to participate.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    14/21

    1. A hands-on exercise or problem tosolve, which produces

    2. An observable outcome or product(typed business letter, a map, graph,

    piece of clothing, multimediapresentation, poem) such that theteacher

    3. Can observe and assess not only theproduct but also the process used to

    get there.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    15/21

    Criteria in revising and refining the task:

    1. The requirements for task mastery should beclear without revealing the solution

    2. The task should represent a specific activity from

    which generalizations about the learnersknowledge, thinking ability, and habits of mind canmade

    3. The tasks should be complex enough to allow formultimodal assessment

    4. The tasks should yield multiple solutions where

    possible, each with costs and benefits5. The tasks should require self-regulated learning

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    16/21

    As of Brookhart and NitkoThe types of tasks you craftdepends on the learning target you

    are assessing

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    17/21

    TASKPROPERTY

    VARIATIONS IN THE TASKS REQUIREMENTS

    TIME TO

    COMPLETETHE TASK

    Short tasks-can be done in one class period or less

    Long tasks-require a month or more, and may need to bedone outside the class

    TASKSTRUCTUREPROVIDED

    Structure may vary in:Problem Solving: High structure means you carefullydefine the problem the students must solve. Low structuremeans students are free to select and define the problemScaffolding: High structure means students are given lotsof guidance or directions in how to begin a solution andwhat materials to use. Low structure means students havelittle or no guidance and must decide for themselves.

    Alternate Strategies: High structure means there are veryfew correct or appropriate pathways to get the correctanswer. Low structure means there are many correct orappropriate to get an acceptable answer.Alternate solutions: High structure means there is a

    correct answer to the task. Low structure means there is nosingle correct answer to this task.

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    18/21

    PARTICIPATION OF

    GROUPS

    The task may require:Individual work:only throughout all phases of

    performance.Group work: performance occurs in group

    PROCESS FOCUSThe task may require:Process assessment: only in which students

    performance of the steps and procedures andnot the outcome are observed and evaluated.

    PERFORMANCE MODALITY

    The task require:

    A single modality: which performance islimited(ex. Oral, written, wood modelMultiple modality: performance must be donein several modes(ex. Do both oral and writtenreport)

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    19/21

    Sample Rubric

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    20/21

    Criteria 1 2 3

    Number of Appropriate

    hand gestures X1

    1 - 4 5 - 9 10 - 12

    Appropriate facialexpression X1

    Lots of inappropriatefacial expression

    Fewinappropriate

    facial expression

    No apparentinappropriate

    facial expression

    Voice inflection X2 Monotone voice used Can vary voice

    inflection with

    difficulty

    Can easily vary

    voice inflection

    Incorporate proper

    ambiance through feelings

    in the voiceX3

    Recitation contains

    very little feelings

    Recitation has

    some feelings

    Recitation fully

    captures

    ambiance through

    feelings in the

    voice

    Recitation Rubric

  • 8/4/2019 Bongggo, Lanie_task Design Ppt

    21/21

    References Santos, Rosita de Guzman, Ph.D., Copyright 2007,Process-Oriented Performance Based Assessment,Assessment of Learning 2, Lorimar Publishing,Inc.,776 Aurora Blvd., cor.Bostos Street, Cubao,Quezon City, Metro Manila.

    Brookhart, Susan M. & Nitko, Anthony J., Copyright2011,2007,2004,2001,1996, PerformanceAssessment, Educational Assessment of Students,6th edition, Pearson Education Inc., Publishing asAllyn and Bacon, 501 Boylston St., Boston, MA,0216.

    Kubiszyn and Borich, Copyright 2007 by John Wileyand Sons,, Educational Testing and Measurement 8thEdition, Clearance Center,Inc.,222 Rosewood Drive,Danvers.