4
 Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report © Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team (JPN) JAPAN 1:2 MEXICO (MEX) Group B, 22 June 2013, 19:00 Local Time Belo Horizonte, Estádio Mineirão (BRA) Match Officials Name Origin Mark 1 Mark 2 Difficulty 3 Referee Felix Brych GER 8.2 --- Normal  Assistant Referee 1 Mark Borsch GER 8.5 --- Normal  Assistant Referee 2 Stefan Lupp GER 8.3 --- Normal Fourth Official Howard Webb ENG 8.3 --- Normal Reserve AR Mike Mullarkey ENG Blog Referee Observer Chefren ITA 1 Final mark according to evaluation scale. Expected level for AARs and fourth official is 8.0, crucial mistake 7.7! 2 Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred). 3 Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of d ifficulty are: “normal”, “challenging” and “very challenging”.  4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator. Evaluation scale (for referee, ARs and fourth official) Description of the Marks 9.0 10.0 Excellent. 8.5 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken. 8.3 8.4 Good. Expected level. 8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement. 8.0 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement. 7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above. 7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 8.2. 7.5 7.7 Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for improvement. 7.0 7.4 Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important mistakes. 6.0 6.9 Unacceptable. Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.): The last matchday of Group A in this FIFA Confederations Cup 2013. The match was played in Belo Horizonte at Estádio Mineirão, in front of an atten dance of 52,690. Both teams were already eliminated from the tournament, having lost all the previous matches. So, a match without a real interest, but at the end it was well played b y both teams. The referee appointed was Felix Brych from Germany, at his first game in this tournament. Howard Webb worked as fourth official. The match in its progress presented several interesting situation, being anyway not that intensive and difficult for the referee.

Brych Jpn Mex Cc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

7/28/2019 Brych Jpn Mex Cc

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brych-jpn-mex-cc 1/4

  Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report  © Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team 

(JPN) JAPAN 1:2 MEXICO (MEX)

Group B, 22 June 2013, 19:00 Local Time – Belo Horizonte, Estádio Mineirão (BRA)

Match Officials Name Origin Mark1 Mark2 Difficulty3

Referee Felix Brych GER 8.2 --- Normal

 Assistant Referee 1 Mark Borsch GER 8.5 --- Normal

 Assistant Referee 2 Stefan Lupp GER 8.3 --- Normal

Fourth Official Howard Webb ENG 8.3 --- Normal

Reserve AR Mike Mullarkey ENG

Blog Referee Observer Chefren ITA

1 Final mark according to evaluation scale. Expected level for AARs and fourth official is 8.0, crucial mistake 7.7!2 Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred).3 Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of d ifficulty are: “normal”, “challenging” and “very challenging”. 4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.

Evaluation scale(for referee, ARs andfourth official)

Description of the Marks

9.0 – 10.0 Excellent.

8.5 – 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.

8.3 – 8.4 Good. Expected level.

8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.

8.0 – 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.

7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.

7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 – 8.2.

7.5 – 7.7Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for improvement.

7.0 – 7.4Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear importantmistake or a performance with two or more clear and importantmistakes.

6.0 – 6.9 Unacceptable.

Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.):The last matchday of Group A in this FIFA Confederations Cup 2013. The match wasplayed in Belo Horizonte at Estádio Mineirão, in front of an attendance of 52,690. Bothteams were already eliminated from the tournament, having lost all the previous matches.So, a match without a real interest, but at the end it was well played by both teams. Thereferee appointed was Felix Brych from Germany, at his first game in this tournament.Howard Webb worked as fourth official. The match in its progress presented severalinteresting situation, being anyway not that intensive and difficult for the referee.

7/28/2019 Brych Jpn Mex Cc

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brych-jpn-mex-cc 2/4

  Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report  © Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team 

Referee

Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the referee’s decision 

49’ Penalty appeal by Mexico. After a shot by Hernandez (MEX), Kurihara (MEX)hits the ball with his hand in area. The decision to consider it as unintentional iscorrect because the arms of the defender are close to body.

90’+1 Penalty whistled in favor of Mexico. Hernandez (MEX) falls down in area after asoft contact with the opponent. A hand on the shoulder made him fall down whilerunning. The call must be evaluated as soft, anyway not a clear mistake, stillacceptable.

Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight thereferee’s tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teamsand players, teamwork etc.).Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!

Positive Points

1. Control of the game and communication with players.

2. Alertness in evaluating crucial situations in penalty area (see 49’ in the gridabove)

3.Waiting prior to whistle, in order to be totally sure and in case, to give a possibleadvantage.

4. Attention when players took free kicks. He ordered often to repeat them becausethe ball was moving. Even in the penalty situation, he was able to notice that theball was in a wrong position.

5. Management of added time: 5 minutes in second half were totally appropriate.

Points for Improvement

1. Excessive usage of the whistle, in calling players.

2.The penalty was a too soft call, still acceptable, but it wasn’t consistent with theother fouls on the middle of the pitch.

3.He decided to give only two YC in a mandatory situations, but the managementcan be improved. For this reason the mark is 8,2. Anyway, overall still a goodperformance.

7/28/2019 Brych Jpn Mex Cc

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brych-jpn-mex-cc 3/4

  Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report  © Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team 

The referee’s character  

Physical Aspects + Expected -

Fitness / Stamina X

 Always close to play without interfering with it X

Flexible diagonal movement X

Positioning at set pieces X

Efficient positioning, having a good angle of vision to play

X

Close to the penalty area, if needed X

Tactical Approachvery

lenientlenient medium strict

verystrict

Description X

 Yes So-so No

Consistency in the tactical approach / style X

The tactical approach suited to the require-

ments of the match / the match benefittedfrom the tactical approach of the referee X

 Ability to adapt the tactical approach if needed

X

Further observations (peculiarities of the referee revealing his character)

Felix Brych had overall a lenient style in this match, preferring to whistle withoutcards. He decided to give a card in first half for a tackle, then another at the endof second half for wasting of time by Mexican keeper (correct). Overall, the fouldetection was good, but the card management can be improved. Again, we can

underline that the penalty call was too soft. Brych should find more consistencyunder this aspect. It was anyway a difficult situation to evaluate and he was a bitfar from the play.

7/28/2019 Brych Jpn Mex Cc

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brych-jpn-mex-cc 4/4

  Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report  © Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team 

Assistant Referee 1

Please assess the first assistant referee’s performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the AR’s behaviour  

9’ Okazaki (JPN) is flagged offside and a goal scored by Japan is disallowed. Verydifficult call, the decision is correct. The player was still on the ground after havingfallen and he appeared in a very slight offside when the teammate shot the ball.

54’ and66’ 

Hernandez (MEX) scores starting from regular positions.

Assistant Referee 2

Please assess the second assistant referee’s performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the AR’s behaviour  

3’ Dos Santos (MEX) is flagged offside Wrong decision, the player was onside.

18’ Jimenez (MEX) is flagged offside. No replay, the decision should be correct.

29’ Dos Santos (MEX) is flagged offside. No replay, the decision should be correct

44’ Dos Santos (MEX) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

86’ Okazaki (JPN) is correctly evaluated onside while scoring. Correct and difficultcall.

Fourth Official

Please assess the fourth official’s performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth official’s behaviour  

 Allmatchlong

Howard Webb was not challenged in this match, he helped well the main referee,executing his work of fourth official, about substitutions and added time.Furthermore, he often appeared very attentive to the play, anyway withoutparticular or relevant situations to underline.