Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Acknowledgements
San Joaquin Audubon Sierra Foothills Audubon Sacramento Audubon Yolo Audubon Altacal Audubon Stanislaus Audubon US Fish & Wildlife Service California Rice Commission
Steve Abbott, Roger Adamson, Dan Brown, Ken Burton, Walt Carnahan, Chuck Carroll, Helene Cavoir, Debbie Daley, Bruce & Kathy Deuel, Julie Dinsdale, J. Frank, Alan England, Tim Fitzer, B. Getty, Jim Groesser, Ed
Harper, Ken Hashagen, Lois Hoy, Scott & Liam Huber, Sami LaRocca, John Lewis, E. Long, Len Mackenzie, Joe Medley, Frances Oliver, Harold & Sue Reeve, Phil Robertson, Jeff Seay, Mike Skram, Dan Stewart, Steve & Priscilla Summers, Craig Swolgaard, Dave Wagner,
Heath Wakelee, Bruce Webb, Gary Woods, Lowell Young, and Bob & Carol Yutzy.
Route Volunteers
Daniel Lee Brown Walt Carnahan Jack Ferrante Ed Harper Peter LaTourrette Robert Lin Diane Pizzo Tom Roach Phil Robertson Zach Smith Larry White
Photography Credits
Study Area
“This geomorphic province more than any other has been altered by activities of humans.” - from A Natural History of California
Tom Roach
Highest Winter Raptor Abundance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Ave/Count Circle Ave/100 pty hrs
CA Central Valley
TX/LA Coastal Plain
All Other
High Winter Raptor Species Richness
Species/Circle Range
CA Central Valley 12.1 7.8 - 13.9
TX/LA Coastal Plain 11.4 7.8 - 15.5
Why Winter Raptor Monitoring in CV?
•High raptor abundance/diversity •Little data on habitat use •Increasing urbanization
Why Winter Raptor Monitoring in CV?
•High raptor abundance/diversity •Little data on habitat use •Increasing urbanization •Conversion of grasslands to intense ag
- Northern Harrier (CA BSSC; FWS BCC most regions) - White-tailed Kite (CA fully-protected, historical declines) - Ferruginous Hawk (FWS BCC throughout breeding range) - Golden Eagle (FWS BCC most regions) - Prairie Falcon (FWS BCC in CA and throughout range) - American Kestrel (significant, widespread declines) - Loggerhead Shrike (CA BSSC; FWS BCC throughout range)
Species of Conservation Concern
Study Objectives
• Assess species richness, diversity, abundance and habitat associations of open-country raptors in the Central Valley during winter
• Establish simple survey protocol for future monitoring efforts (Repeatability)
• Create dataset useful for future land management decisions affecting critical wildlife habitat in CV
Tehama
Yuba Beale AFB Lincoln
Linden Oakdale
Le Grand
Delta
Butte N Butte S
Shasta
Folsom
Dunnigan Hills Woodland
Davis Jepson
Los Banos Madera
Kings
Survey Routes
Quantification of Habitat
- Assessed every half-mile
- Two blocks per point, one on either side of road
- One block = 500 meters x 800 meters
- Assign dominant habitat type for each block - 12 categories
- GPS coordinates taken for each point
Survey Protocol • Driving routes through open country 1x per month,
December - February (distance range: 42 - 81 km) • Surveys run mid-morning through early afternoon
(0800 - 1400) • Raptors observed (Area Search, NOT Point Count
methodology) within 500 m of survey road, mileage recorded to nearest tenth of mile for each bird, recorded species, age, sex, morph, behavior
• Distance categories from survey road:
– bird observed along survey road (perched only) – bird observed away from survey road
Number of Surveys 180 Total Survey Hours 1541 Total Area Surveyed 112,720 ha Total Birds Observed 20976 Average Density (birds/1000 ha) 20 ± 2 Average Species Richness (range) 9.6 ± 0.2 (5-16)
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Ferruginous Hawk (tot obs = 630)
-0.005
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Rough-legged Hawk (tot obs = 143)
-0.008
-0.006
-0.004
-0.002
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Prairie Falcon (tot obs = 232)
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Northern Harrier (tot obs = 1396)
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
White-tailed Kite (tot obs = 468)
-0.02
-0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Bald Eagle (tot obs = 276)
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Red-tailed Hawk (tot obs = 7950)
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
American Kestrel (tot obs = 3622)
-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Grsld Row Rice Orch Urb Pstr Sav Alf Wtld Oth For
Vine other
Diff
eren
ce b
etw
een
habi
tat d
enst
iy a
nd o
vera
ll av
e. d
ensi
ty
Loggerhead Shrike
TUVU WTKI NOHA BAEA Accipiters RSHA RTHA FEHA RLHA GOEA AMKE MERL PEFA PRFA LOSH
Grassland - - - + + + + - + + Row Crop - - - - - - - - -
Rice - + + + + - - - + - - Orchard - - - - - - - - - -
Urbanized - - - - - - - - Irr. Pasture + + + + + + - + - +
Savannah + - - - - - - - - - Alfalfa - + + - - + - + -
Wetland + + + + + + + - Other
Forage + + + - + Vineyard - - - - - - - -
Other + + - - - - -
TUVU WTKI NOHA BAEA Accipiters RSHA RTHA FEHA RLHA GOEA AMKE MERL PEFA PRFA LOSH
Grassland - - - + + + + - + + Row Crop - - - - - - - - -
Rice - + + + + - - - + - - Orchard - - - - - - - - - -
Urbanized - - - - - - - - Irr. Pasture + + + + + + - + - +
Savannah + - - - - - - - - - Alfalfa - + + - - + - + -
Wetland + + + + + + + - Other
Forage + + + - + Vineyard - - - - - - - -
Other + + - - - - -
TUVU WTKI NOHA BAEA Accipiters RSHA RTHA FEHA RLHA GOEA AMKE MERL PEFA PRFA LOSH
Grassland - - - + + + + - + + Row Crop - - - - - - - - -
Rice - + + + + - - - + - - Orchard - - - - - - - - - -
Urbanized - - - - - - - - Irr. Pasture + + + + + + - + - +
Savannah + - - - - - - - - - Alfalfa - + + - - + - + -
Wetland + + + + + + + - Other
Forage + + + - + Vineyard - - - - - - - -
Other + + - - - - -
TUVU WTKI NOHA BAEA Accipiters RSHA RTHA FEHA RLHA GOEA AMKE MERL PEFA PRFA LOSH
Grassland - - - + + + + - + + Row Crop - - - - - - - - -
Rice - + + + + - - - + - - Orchard - - - - - - - - - -
Urbanized - - - - - - - - Irr. Pasture + + + + + + - + - +
Savannah + - - - - - - - - - Alfalfa - + + - - + - + -
Wetland + + + + + + + - Other
Forage + + + - + Vineyard - - - - - - - -
Other + + - - - - -
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Tehama
ButteS
Madera
Lincoln
LsBanos
Kings
DunHls
Folsom
Jepson
Shasta
Beale
LeGrand
Oakdale
Linden
Birds/1000 ha
Grslnd Density of Grslnd Specialists by Route
TOTAL
PRFA
GOEA
RLHA
FEHA
Tehama
Yuba Beale AFB Lincoln
Linden Oakdale
Le Grand
Delta
Butte N &S
Shasta
Folsom
Woodland & Dunnigan Hills
Davis & Jepson
Los Banos Madera
Kings
High Value Grasslands?
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
RTHA FEHA RLHA
Perch Preferences of Buteos Pole
Tree
Fence
Ground
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
RTHA FEHA RLHA
Perch Preferences of Buteos Pole
Tree
Fence
Ground
Hypotheses for AMKE Distribution by Sex
• “Everybody’s Happy” – (Koplin 1973, Stinson et al. 1981, and Meyer and
Balgooyen 1987 )
Hypotheses for AMKE Distribution by Sex
• “Everybody’s Happy” – (Koplin 1973, Stinson et al. 1981, and Meyer and
Balgooyen 1987 ) • “Girls Rule”
Hypotheses for AMKE Distribution by Sex
• “Everybody’s Happy” – (Koplin 1973, Stinson et al. 1981, and Meyer and
Balgooyen 1987 ) • “Girls Rule”
– (Mills 1976, Ardia and Bildstein 1997, 2001, and Ardia 2002 )
Hypotheses for AMKE Distribution by Sex
• “Everybody’s Happy” – (Koplin 1973, Stinson et al. 1981, and Meyer and
Balgooyen 1987 ) • “Girls Rule”
– (Mills 1976, Ardia and Bildstein 1997, 2001, and Ardia 2002 )
• “First come, First Served”
Hypotheses for AMKE Distribution by Sex
• “Everybody’s Happy” – (Koplin 1973, Stinson et al. 1981, and Meyer and
Balgooyen 1987 ) • “Girls Rule”
– (Mills 1976, Ardia and Bildstein 1997, 2001, and Ardia 2002 )
• “First come, First Served”
– (Smallwood 1988)
Summary
• Certain habitats important to wintering raptors in the CV – Wetland, Grassland, Pasture, Alfalfa, Rice
• Some habitats largely avoided
– Urban, Row Crop, Orchard, Vineyard • Grassland species NEED grassland and need it grazed
• Grasslands of the northeast corner of the San Joaquin
Valley seem to be particularly rich. – Combine with other datasets to try to understand why