Upload
theanuuradha1993gmai
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
1/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-1
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
3Chapter
Changing Profiles of
Major Stakeholders of
Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
2/36
ASJAD USMANI3-2
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Trade Unions
1. Blue Collar-Workers' Trade UnionTrade Unionism grew as one of the most powerful socio-economic political
institutions of our time - to fill in the vacuum created by industrial revolution in the
industrial society. It came as a countervailing force to reconcile social and economic
aberrations created by Industrial Revolution.
FORMATIVE STAGES
Trade Union had to pass through a very difficult and hostile period in the initial
years. The employers wanted to crush them with iron hands.
Then came the period of agitation and occasional acceptance.
When the union gained strength, they started confronting the employer. This isthe period of struggle which continued for long.
Employers were forced to accommodate, tolerate and hesitatingly accept them.
Then came the period of understanding collective bargaining in the industry.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
3/36
ASJAD USMANI3-3
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
DEFINITION
Trade union is an association either of employees or employers or of
independent workers.
It is relatively a permanent formation of workers. It is not a temporary or casual
combination of workers.
It is formed for securing certain economic (like better wages, better working
and living conditions), and social (such as educational, recreational, medical,
respect for individual) benefits to members.
A more recent and non-legislative definition of a union is:
"An organisation of workers acting collectively, who seek to protect and promote
their mutual interests through collective bargaining".
De Cenzo and Robb ins (1993)
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
4/36
ASJAD USMANI3-4
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
FORMS OF TRADE UNIONS
1. Classical: A trade union's main objective is to collectively protect the interestsof its members in a given socio-economic-political system.
2. Neo-classical: It goes beyond the classical objectives and tries to improve
other wider issues like tax-reliefs, raising saving rates, etc.
3. Revolut ionary change in the system: Establishing the rule of working class
even through violence, use of force, etc.
Functions of Trade Unions
a) Mil i tant or pro tect ive or intra-mutual func t ions
b) Fraternal or extramural fun ct ion s
c) Pol i t ica l funct ion s
d) Socia l funct ion s
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
5/36
ASJAD USMANI3-5
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Objectives of Trade Unions
a) Wages and Salaries
b ) Work ing cond i t ions
c) Discipl ine
d) Personnel po l ic ies
e) Welfare
f) Emp loyee-emplo yer relat ions
g) Negot ia t ing machinery
h ) Safeguarding organisat ional health and the interest of the indus try
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
6/36
ASJAD USMANI3-6
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
ROLE OF TRADE UNIONS
a) Sect ional Bargainer
b ) Class Bargainer
c) Agents of State
d ) Partners in Social Contro l
e) Union s' role
f) Bu siness Oriented Role
g) Unions as Change Agent
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
7/36ASJAD USMANI3-7
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
CLASSIFICATION OF TRADE UNIONS
Classification based on ideology
Revolutionary Unions: Believe in destruction of existing social/economic
order.
Reformist or Welfare Unions: Work for changes and reforms within the
existing socio-political framework of the society - European Model.
Uplift Unions:They advocate extensive reforms well beyond the area ofworking condition.
Classification Based on Trade
Many unions have memberships and jurisdictions based on the trades they
represent. The most narrow in membership is the craft union, which represents
only members certified in a given craft or trade, such as pipe fitting, carpentry
and clerical work.
At the other extreme, in terms of the range of workers represented in the
general union, which has members drawn from all trades. Most unions in India
and Sri Lanka are in this category.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
8/36ASJAD USMANI3-8
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Classification Based on Agreement
Closed Shop
Union Shop
Preferential Shop
Maintenance Shop
Agency Shop
Open ShopTheories of Trade Unionism
a) Political Revolutionary Theory of Labour Movement of Marx and Engels
b) Webb's Theory of Industrial Democracy
c) Cole's Theory of Union Control of Industry
d) Common's Environment Theory
e) Mitchell's Economic Protection Theory of Trade Unionism
f) Simon's Theory of Monopolistic, anti-Democratic Trade Unionism
g) Perlman's Theory of the "Scarcity Consciousness" of Manual Workers
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
9/36ASJAD USMANI3-9
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
GROWTH OF TRADE UNION MOVEMENT AND MEMBERSHIP
Early PeriodEfforts towards organising the workers for their welfare were made during the early
period of industrial development by social workers, philanthropists and other
religious leaders mostly on humanitarian grounds. The first Factories Act, 1881, was
passed on the basis of the recommendations of the Bombay Factory Commission,
1875. Due to the limitations of the Act, the workers in the Bombay Textile Industry
under the leadership of N. Lokhande demanded reduced hours of work, weekly rest
days, mid-day recess and compensation for injuries.
Modest Beginning
The beginning of the Labour Movement in the modern sense started after the
outbreak of World War I in the country. Economic, political and social conditions of
the day influenced the growth of trade union movement in India. Establishment of
International Labour Organisation in 1919 helped the formation of trade unions in
the country.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
10/36ASJAD USMANI3-10
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Some of the typical Joint Comm ittees are:
1. Compensation Committee2. Welfare Committee
3. Canteen Management Committee
4. Transport Management Committee
5. Sports and Entertainment Committee
6. Employee of the Month Committee
7. Suggestion Committee
8. Employees Health Safety and Environment Management Committee
9. Good House Keeping Committee
10. Grievance Committee
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
11/36ASJAD USMANI3-11
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
TRADE UNION ACT, 1926
The Trade Union Act 1926 legalises the formation of trade unions by allowingemployees to form trade union. It allows trade union to get registered under the Act.
Registration provides legal status to the trade union and it becomes body corporate.
It can hold moveable and immoveable property and can enter into contract and can
sue and can be sued. The Act also provides immunities to the unions from civil and
criminal prosecution for bona fide trade union activities. The Union can generate
General Fund for the day-to-day activities and Political Fund for political activities
(For details - Refer Act).
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
12/36ASJAD USMANI3-12
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
RECOGNITION OF TRADE UNION
The underlying idea of forming a trade union is to negotiate and bargain withemployers to improve the service and employment conditions of workers on their
behalf. This collective bargaining process can be possible only when the employer
recognises the trade union as a bargaining agent and agrees to negotiate with it
because it is difficult to negotiate with multiple trade unions in a single organisation.
The Trade Union Act 1926, is the only Central Law, which regulates the working of
the unions and does not have any provision for recognition of trade unions. Some
attempts were made to include compulsory recognition in the Trade Union Act of
1947, 1950, 1978 and 1988, but these did not get materialised.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
13/36ASJAD USMANI3-13
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
RIGHTS OF RECOGNISED UNIONS
a) the right to raise issues with the management,b) right to collect membership fees within the premises of the organisation,
c) ability to demand check-off facility,
d) ability to put up a noticeboard on the premises for union announcements,
e) ability to hold discussions with employees at a suitable place within the
premises
f) right to discuss members' grievances with the employer,
g) ability to inspect beforehand a place of employment or work of its members,
and
h) nomination of its representatives on committees formed by the management for
industrial relations purposes as well as in statutory bipartite committees.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
14/36ASJAD USMANI3-14
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
PROBLEMS CONFRONTING UNIONS AND MEASURES TO STRENGTHEN
TRADE UNION MOVEMENT IN INDIA
Trade Union Leadership
Reasons for Emergence of outside Leadership
The Evil Effects of outside Leadership
Measures to Minimize the Evil Effects of outside Leadership
Measures to Minimise Union Rivalry
Multiple Unions
Union Rivalry
Finance
Other Problems
1. Illiteracy
2. Uneven growth
3. Low membership
4. Heterogeneous nature of labour
5. Lack of Interest
6. Absence of paid office-bearers
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
15/36ASJAD USMANI3-15
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Measures to strengthen Trade Union Movement in India
The following are some of the measures to minimise trade union problems and to
strengthen the Trade Union Movement of India.
United Labour Front
Efficient Leadership
Membership Fees
Other Measures
BUILDING RESPONSIVE TRADE UNIONISM
i. Inactive Indifferent, none of their business' posture.
ii. Reactive Violent reaction, blocking, rejecting, coercing, striking.
iii. Responsive Addressing, supporting, adopting.
iv. Proactive Agent/catalyst of change.
v. Partnering Responsible, taking risks along with employers.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
16/36ASJAD USMANI3-16
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
STRATEGY FOR BUILDING RESPONSIBLE TRADE UNIONISM
1. Micro to macro focus
2. Bargain ing to shar ing
3. Groom ing trade union leadership
4. Conf l ic t to col laborat ion
5. Developm ental role
6. Enhancing union inf luence
7. Protect ive regulat ion to self-sus tenance
8. Openness and transparency
9. Effect ive ut i l isat ion of alternat ive forums
10.ACCEPT, SHARE and GROW
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
17/36ASJAD USMANI3-17
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
FEMALE WORKERS and TRADE UNIONS
Female workers in India are mostly employed in the organized sector. Therefore,the trade unions, which initially represented mostly organized workmen, did not pay
much attention to female labour. It is only recently that some national trade union
centers in India have announced that if their affiliates send nominations for
representation at various decision-making levels in the union hierarchy without a
woman member in the panel, they will not consider the panel.
Union membership and union leadership amongst women is higher in some
occupations than in others. In the garment industry, the proportion of women to the
total members could be about 70%. In plantations, hospitals, hotels,
telecommunication, public service, and anganwadis, women occupy positions as
joint secretary/secretary. In teaching and nursing they hold even higher positions.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
18/36ASJAD USMANI3-18
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Why Women Do Not Join Unions
1. Family responsibilities-childcare, all household duties-are left mainly to women.
2. Religion, taboos, and cultural inhibitions make it difficult for women to break
into male environments.
3. In the workplace, women are often employed in subordinate positions under
the supervision of men in more powerful positions. The occupational
segregation in union structures create barriers for women's advancement.4. Trade unions are often male dominated because of
The notion that working in the union is a 24 hours a day job, The tendency to hold meetings at night,
Union jargon and sexist language,
Informal male structure(old-boys network), Less interest in women's issues, Less access to education and training for women in many places,
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
19/36ASJAD USMANI3-19
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
EMERGING TRENDS
1. The customized services hypothesis that union will individualise services.
2. The cyber organizing hypothesis that the Web will produce virtual minority
unions in many non-union firms.
3. The cyber democracy hypothesis that the Web will become an important forum
for industrial disputes.
4. The Web will strengthen the international labour community.
5. The Web will strengthen the international labour community by helping union
exploit the opportunities on the Web to gain membership.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
20/36ASJAD USMANI3-20
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
2. White-collar Trade Unions
There was a time when unions and strikes were known only to blue-collar workers
in factories, mines, railways docks, etc. White-collar employees and professional
people like doctors, engineers, lawyers, professors and senior executives and
managerial staffs thought it below their dignity to band themselves in unions, march
the high streets and yell slogans. Today, it is different. Trade unions exist among
most professionals, white-collar employees, officers, senior executives and
managers, and so do strikes and gheraos.
C f f S f
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
21/36ASJAD USMANI
3-21
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
WHITE-COLLAR WORKERS AND BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS
Differences between Blue and White-Collar Workers
S.No. Blue-Collar Worker White Collar Worker
1. All shop -floor workers (Part of the productionteam who operate machines and relatedsystems) are termed as blue -collar workers,as their work is not generally clean.
All clerical or office staff who do notwork on theshop floor, are termed as white -collar workersas their work and working places are clean.
They are generally involved in a desk job orproviding service over the counter.
2. They are manual workers with lower literacy
and education and have their own social andeconomic background.
They are non-manual workers forming a distinct
social ground, characterised by divergent socio-economic backgrounds, level of education,manner of speech, social custom and ideology.They are better educated and ha ve jobsrequiring mental capabilities to a greater extent.
3. They may be paid by time, or by piece, orresults, either on daily, or weekly, orfortnightly, or monthly basis. They are
generally wage earners, and may have lesserholidays, and leave facilit ies and otherprivileges than white-collar workers.
They are time -workers paid on monthly basis.They enjoy longer holidays and leave facilitiesand better privileges.
4. They are not so i nc li ned towardsmanagement. On the other hand, they may becaring f or their unions than for themanagement.
They hold such jobs that they are regarded aspart of the management, and so they are moreinclined towards it than the blue-collar workers.
Ch i P fil f M j St k h ld f I d t i l R l ti i I di
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
22/36ASJAD USMANI
3-22
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
5. Excepting highly skilled categories who are in
greater demand and can manage to havehigher wages in income, the blue -collarworkers are not so well paid.
Their fringe benefits and perquisites are lowerthan those of white-collar workers.
Because of their professional and social
standing they are generally better paid andhave bet ter t erms and condi tions ofemployment, including better perquisites andfringe benefits.
6 They have better union protection and jobsecurity by labour legislation, such asIndustrial Disputes Act.
They have no union protection if they are notunionised, and also job security if they are notcovered by the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as
may be the case with a few of them.7 They are mostly engaged in production
processes.They are concentrated in the fields ofcommerc e, t rans port, st or age andcommunication. They are engaged in differentoccupations that fall under the category ofprofessional, administrative, executive andmanagerial workers, clerical and relatedworkers, sales staff, technical and supervisoryand other workers, engaged in transp ort and
communication services, or in sports andrecreational facilities, artists and musicians.
8 They have no authority, nor are theyassociated with decisiontaking.
They are linked with their employers by beingassociated with that part of the product iveprocess where authority is exercised anddecisions are taken.
Ch i P fil f M j St k h ld f I d t i l R l ti i I di
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
23/36ASJAD USMANI
3-23
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Why White-Collar Workers' Unions?
The growth of white-collar unionism are:
1. Denial of both, job security and social security to them by their exclusion from
the purview of labour laws like Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
2. Anomalies in pay caused by implementation of the recommendations of Wage
Boards and Pay Commissions.
3. Nationalisation and consequent rationalisation of pay and perquisites.
4. Inconsistent and discriminatory promotion and salary policies which have been
causing so many conflicts and disputes.
5. Gradual narrowing of wages and salary differentials of blue and white-collar
workers due to fast improvement in the wages.
6. Inflation and soaring prices resulting in erosion of pay and standard of living of
white-collar workers and, thus, leading to demand for higher pay, dearness
allowance and annual bonus and other fringe benefits.
Ch i P fil f M j St k h ld f I d t i l R l ti i I di
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
24/36ASJAD USMANI
3-24
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Managerial Associations
Managerial trade unionism is no longer a fiction, but is an established fact. Though
this phenomenon is more than forty years old, it is yet to be considered as
worthwhile to be concerned with, either by the Government or by the Central bodies
of trade unions or by academicians. The Government could not enact a legislation
concerning this aspect of trade unionism or could not introduce some procedure forredressal of grievances of the managerial staff. The Central organisations of trade
unions could have provided leadership or guidance for proper organisation of such
unions. The academicians, if they had wished, could have attempted an indepth
study of managerial unionism and workshops. It is only the corporate managements
who could not ignore this happening. In fact, they are finding it difficult to develop
working relations with their managers and other officers in the absence of any
corporate or national policy on this subject.
Ch i P fil f M j St k h ld f I d t i l R l ti i I di
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
25/36ASJAD USMANI
3-25
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Employers' Associations
Employers' Organisations (EOs) are "formal groups of employers set up to defend,
represent or advise affiliated employers and to strengthen their position in society at
large with respect to labour matters as distinct from economic matters. They may
conclude collective agreements but this is not a formal rule and cannot be an
element of their definition. Unlike trade unions, which are composed of individualpersons, employers' organisations are composed of enterprises. Most legal
definitions of a trade union apply to them (Oechslin, 1990). The Trade Union Act,
1926 includes in its purview, both associations of workers as well as employers.
Employers' Associations came into existence as a result of the formation of ILO andthe growing presence of Trade Unions, especially after the First World War.
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
26/36ASJAD USMANI
3-26
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Objectives
Primary
a) Promote and protect the interests of employers engaged in industry, trade and
commerce in India.
b) Study, analyse and disseminate information relating to labour policy, labour-
management relations, collective bargaining, etc.
c) Offer advice concerning various aspects of labour policy.
d) Liaise with Union Government and initiate steps that are representative and
legislative in nature.
Secondary
a) Train and develop staff and members.
b) Obtain data on wages and conditions of work in industries attached to them.
c) Take up projects for social and family welfare.
d) Initiate steps to improve public image and improve public relations.
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
27/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-27
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Government Policies and Industrial Relations
In the initial years of Industrial Revolution, Government followed the policy of
Laissez faire (non-interference) in settling Employers' and Workers' problems.
Parties were left free to settle scores the way they liked. Towards the end of the
19th century, the change was witnessed in the attitude of the Government. It was
constrained to intervene and bring protective legislations because of the following
reasons:
Pressure from ILO/ILC/SLC.
Pressure from T.U. Movements.
Gandhian philosophy of trusteeship, Govt. felt the need to develop instruments
of voluntarism.
Pressure from Constitutional obligations to fulfil Pledges and Promises as
enshrined in the Preamble, Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of
State Policies.
Government emerged as the biggest employer.
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
28/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-28
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
ROLE OF THE STATE IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
As the National Commission on Labour (1969) observed, "The concern of the Statein labour matters emanates as much from its obligations to safeguard the interests
of workers and employers, as to ensure to the community, the availability of their
joint product/service at a reasonable price. The extent of its involvement in the
process is determined by the level of social and economic advancement, while the
mode of intervention gets patterned in conformity with the political system obtaining
in the country and the social and cultural traditions of its people."
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
29/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-29
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
CONSTITUTION AND LABOUR POLICIES
The preamble to the Constitution of India provides the framework within which thelabour policies of the organisation can be formulated in India:
"We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute into a sovereign
socialist secular democratic republic and to secure to all its citizens;
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote them among all,
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of theNation"
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
30/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-30
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
Evolution of labour policy during the five year plans
A major landmark event influencing post-independence era labour policies was the
report of the Labour Investigation Committee, 1946. The National Government in
1946 drew up a four-year phased programme to:
a) revise the existing labour legislations to meet the changing needs of the time;
b) eliminate completely and/or control contract labour;
c) extend employment opportunities/exchanges to cover all classes of workers;
d) evolve fair terms of service and deal for workers;
e) fix wages in sweated industries, rationalise rate of dearness allowance to
promote fair wage agreement; and
f) lay down nucleus for an industrial health insurance programme.
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
31/36
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
32/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-32
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
THE WORKING OF TRIPARTISM A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Tripartite deliberations helped to reach a consensus, inter alia, on statutory
minimum wage fixation (1944), introduction of a health insurance scheme (1945), a
provident fund scheme (1950), leading to the passing of three importance Central
Labour Laws, namely, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Employees' State
Insurance Act, 1948, and the Employees' Provident Fund Act, 1952. the tripartite
deliberations during 1942-46 on the revision of the Trade Disputes Act, 1929 helpedthe Union Government to enact the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which laid down
comprehensive disputes settlement procedures to be applicable to all states.
However a few states (e.g. Maharashtra and Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar
Pradesh, and Rajasthan) made their own legislation which were operative within the
state boundaries along with the Central legislation. This duality of labour
administration could not be mitigated by the ILC due to obvious limitations set on it
by the inclusive of 'labour' in the 'Concurrent List' of the Constitution.
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
33/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-33
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
BIPARTITE CONSULTATIVE MACHINERY
Towards the realization of the goals set out in the national economic plans, theGovernment of India has also created bipartite consultative machinery for ensuring
cooperation between workers and employers. Here we shall briefly consider the
experience with Joint Consultative Board (JCB) and National Apex Body (NAB).
Joint Consultative Board
A Joint Consultative Board (JCB) of Industry and Labour was set up in 1951 largely
at the initiative of Mr. GL Nanda, then Minister for planning and deputy Chairman of
the Planning Committee of Industries of Planning Commission. To begin with, the
JCB was set up as an official body to consider, advise, and cooperate with theGovernment on matters relating to industrial relations in general and specific issues
such as retrenchment in particular.
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
34/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-34
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
PARADIGM SHIFT IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS POLICY OF GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA
Keeping in view the emerging economic scenario, government policies should
make a paradigm shift from regulation, protection and control to enabling,
facilitating and protecting from dispute resolution to social and economic
development.
There should be a gradual decline in the role of the state not too much and
too frequent interventions.
There should be a shift in industrial relation-information sharing, consultation,
communication, transparency and consensus development at all levels.
The state should broad-base their labour policies and labour legislations to
cover unorganised sectors in a big way.
The state should address the problems of diverse labour force-female worker,
bonded labour, child labour, unorganised labour and migrant labour from India
and abroad.
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
35/36
ASJAD USMANI
3-35
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Cont.
STATE GOVERNMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL RELATION
Labour is in the Concurrent List of the Constitution. According to Article 246 of the
Constitution of India, both, the Parliament and State Legislatures can enact laws on
aspects relating to employment, trade unions, industrial disputes, social security etc.
Generally speaking, the State Government is the appropriate authority for
administering Central Laws in most cases.
Different Practices at State Level
Changes in Labour Law/Policy at the State Level
Recognition of Bargaining Agent
Simplified Labour Inspection
New Thrust in Labour Policy
Permissions for Closure, Retrenchment, and Lay-off
Wages
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
8/13/2019 CH-03 Asjad Sir
36/36
3-36
Changing Profiles of Major Stakeholders of Industrial Relations in India
Limits to the Powers of the State
There is a limit to the role and powers of the state governments. They are duty-bound to refer their enactments and amendments to the Centre for the assent of the
President of India. The Central Government may on its own, or upon being referred
to by the President, tender advice to form the basis for the President's decision. The
usual practice of the President's office is not to act, rather than to turn down the
proposals for changes perse. Some years ago, the Tamil Nadu government raised
the limit of the number of employees required in an establishment for application of
certain Central Legislations (like the Factories Act and the Industrial Disputes Act),
as well as for prior approval for lay-offs, lock-outs and closures. Similarly, it took
many years for Andhra Pradesh to get Presidential approval for its legislations
concerning worker's participation in management and insurance for workers
affected by structural changes. Finally, of course, Andhra Pradesh did not go ahead
with its proposals.