Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CCoommpprreehheennssiivvee DDiissttrriicctt AAggrriiccuullttuurree PPllaann
22001122--1133 ttoo 22001166--1177
DDiissttrriicctt RRaattnnaaggiirrii
1
Executive Summary
Introduction
Agriculture is the basic way of life of the district. It provides sustenance for the vast
majority of our population, but because of the failure of the crops in the last few years there
has been a loss in the momentum which suggests a deeper problem in our strategy, correcting
this is the main focus of the plan. The present comprehensive Agriculture policy after taking a
careful note of the harsh realities backed by necessary figures and statistics has stressed the
need to act on the following aspects.
Agriculture
To increase the crop productivity in the said plan the policy emphasized on the
important of Micro – irrigation by providing subsidy to the micro irrigation equipments,
dissemination of need based technologies and demonstrating the same at the gross root level
so that farmers will be educated in identifying the constraints in the crop production.
Also, production of certified seeds and availability at affordable prices finds a place in the plan.
As the district has larger areas of marginally fertile soils which are utilized by for producing
minor millets and horticulture so that income can also be expected from such soils which
otherwise go as uncultivable waste lands. In the recent years organic farming is gaining
importance, which also finds a place in the plan which certainly help to maintain and enhance
soil health.
Increasing the area under irrigation is important for increasing cropping intensity,
productivity enhancement and area expansion coupled with this mechanization has been
promoted on a large scale to overcome the problem of labour shortage brought about from the
urban migration.
Vast fallow land area is available in the district, too needs to be diverted to converted to
horticulture and encouragement is given for processing increasing part of the same. Also, large
area of Horticulture and unclassified forest on private lands and Mangrove Forest are available
in the district which can be utilised for promoting Apiculture as an Industry which helps in
increasing the crop yields by way of cross pollination and also provides rural employment.
Also considering the prestine, natural beauty and the biodiversity of the region Low Cost Agro –
Tourism needs to be promoted on a cluster basis to increase farmers income.
Farmers agriculture income will be increased only when they get the remunerative prices, in
times of distress sales the produce needs value addition which finds a place in the plan through
Agro processing, Public private partnership participation and providing right information to the
farmers by strengthening the extension system.
Horticulture
Ratnagiri district is blessed with soil and climatic conditions suitable for cultivation of
horticultural crops, however because of various reasons there is a massive gap in productivity of
Mango, Cashewnut and Coconut. So the plan emphasizes educating and encouraging farmers
them to undertake Integrated Crop Management and also aid more expansion of area for fruits
including the dry land horticulture crops, medicinal and aromatic plants.
2
As mentioned above, the major constraints of the horticultural production is the
irrigation, so importance has been given to insitu water harvesting (Konkan Jalkund, Konkan
Vijay Bandhara) and rain water harvesting.
Popularization of Organic farming and providing and technical know –how to the farmers
and exporting the same is stressed in the plan. Importance has been given to the processing of
fruit crops especially the cashew apple and promoting Alcohol extraction for industrial and
medicinal purposes and Wine manufacturing so that the farmers get assured price for their
produce.
District is known for its Alphonso Mango, canning variety (30% of total production) a
large part which (83%) goes out of the district for blending with other low cost varieties and is
marketed in the domestic and international as Pure Alphonso mango Pulp thereby degrading
the Alphonso Mango Brand of Ratnagiri district. An aseptic unit backed by clusters of Mango
growers too needs to be addressed vide the said plan.
Watershed Development
The focus of the plan is to conserve soil and moisture as well as to put to the best use
according their capabilities to improve the overall productivity of the catchments in a holistic
way.
Animal husbandry Development
The plan concentrates on increasing the cattle and buffaloes population of the district by
providing necessary facilities. Along with up gradation of local cattle through effective A.I.
programs it is suggested to establish hatcheries at IPD block to produce local varieties of chicks
and to Strengthen the distribution network of government Hatcheries by involving SHG’s /
producer association. Strengthening and modernization of existing veterinary hospitals and
dispensaries which is long overdue to give quality services to farmers. Strengthening of diary
cooperatives too is suggested in order to rivive the sagging milk collection.
Fisheries Development
With the main objective of reviving the dwindling stock and also reinstate the earlier
levels of annual production from marine fisheries by instituting controls and encouraging deep
sea fisheries to increase production. The aim is also towards increasing the production of fish
from tanks, river and reservoir fishery various development schemes finds a place in the district
plan, placing greater importance on production cum employment oriented activities. With the
increased demand for fish, most of the tanks and ponds in the district The internal water
resources are to be development by stocking fish seeds. Mariculture too is to be encouraged in
order to provide impetus to Cultivation and harvesting of mussels and crustaeceans.
Districts Industries Development
For overall socio economic development of the district, strengthen the manufacturing
industry in agriculture and processing and cottage industries in horticulture and allied sector.
Coconut offers potential for a host of alled industries in processing every seperate parts of the
tree. Also provision has been made to provide capital investment subsidy to new, expansion or
modernized industrial unit.
3
Agricultural Marketing Development
Agricultural marketing plays a pivotal role in strengthening the economy of a producer
with the main objective of achieving marketing efficiency. The district plan focuses on overall
development by constructing rural godowns, providing cold storage facilities grading units,
packing units and irridiation plant. Importance has been given to providing transportation
facilities, and encourage mango growers to undertake export to the international market and
encourage farmers to adopt GLOBALGAP standards.
Minor Irrigation Development
The division has to irrigate an extensively large area in Ratnagiri district by devising
forward linkages in development of delivery mechanisms and thereby increasing the cropping
intensity in the district which is at a low 113% and also constructing Tanks and tapping the
largely unused groundwater. The plant targets to bring around 4000 ha of land under irrigation.
Public Private Partnership
Value addition and contract farming in Alphonso Mango and Cashewnut crop,
processing and packing units.
Promotion of Oilseeds, food and fruit processing industries.
Establishment of organic retail sale points at district and taluka level
Establishment of cold storage and godawoon
Impact on Farmers Income
The prevailing average net income of the farmers when considered taking in to account
the allied activities stands at Rs. 27206. The effort put in through the various activities taken up
by the development departments is expected the farm family income to Rs 32170 at the end of
Eleventh Five Year Plan.
Budget Requirement
In order to achieve the target growth rate the district comprehensive agricultural plan
has proposed (2012-13 to 2016-17) an outlay of Rs. 7475.79 lakhs for Agriculture development,
Rs. 2895.55 lakhs for horticulture development, Rs 22087.19 lakhs for watershed development,
Rs. 3834.55 lakhs for Animal Husbandry development, 6839.96 lakh for fisheries development,
Rs. 30.00 lakhs for social forestry, Rs. 2823.25 lakhs for cooperative society. The estimated
gross budgetary requirement for the overall development is pegged at Rs. 48231.69 lakhs (for
the period 2012-13 to 2016-17).
1
Flow Chart of Consultation Process
Need based on
Gram Sabhas
Discussion with Gram Panchayat Presidents and
members
Line Department at Gram
Panchayat level
Krishi Pandit and Profession 1 farmers
Taluka Agriculture Office
Non Government
Organisations
Taluk level line Departments
District Superintending Agriculture Office
All line Departm
Konkan Agricultural
5
Flow Chart of Consultation Process
Wakawli G.P
G.P
Bharne G.P
Nive G.P
Mandangad Taluka
Agriculture Office
Dapoli Taluka
Agriculture Office
Panchayath
Khed Taluka
Agriculture Office
District Supertending Agriculture Office
Experts, Scientists, Krishi panditts and progressive farmers
All concerned Line departments & NGOs
Sheer G. P
Chiplun Taluka
Agriculture Office
Sangamesh-war
Taluka Agriculture
Office
CDAP Consultant
Guhagar Taluka
Agriculture Office
Kalwande G.P
Ratnagiri Taluka
Agriculture Office
NakhareG. P
Vehel G. P Adivare
G. P
Lanja Taluka
Agriculture Office Rajapur
Taluka Agriculture
Office
6
Chapter I
Introduction
Performance of agriculture sector in the country has turned out to be quite dissatisfactory
because of sharp deceleration in growth rate of agricultural output. Ministry of Finance, Planning
Commission, and office of the Prime Minister are emphasizing concerted measures to address poor
growth rate in agriculture, partly because poor growth rate has serious implications on the food
availability for the ever-growing population and partly because it affects growth of overall economy
of our country. The 53rd National Development Council resolved that agricultural strategies must be
reoriented to meet the needs of the farmers and called upon the Central and States to evolve a
strategy to rejuvenate agriculture. The NDC reaffirmed its commitment to achieve 4% annual
growth in the agriculture sector during the 11th Five-Year Plan.
As per the resolution, States have to formulate District Agriculture Plan for each district that
fully utilizes resources available from all existing schemes, State or Central, including resources at
the district level. The District Agriculture Plan includes livestock and fishing also and be integrated
with minor irrigation projects, rural development works and with other schemes for water harvesting
and conservation.
The District Agriculture Plan is prepared by combined efforts of departments of agriculture,
animal husbandry, fisheries, dairy development and expert from State Agriculture University.
Present scenario of the district is studied and growth rate of agriculture is calculated. Reasons for
low productivity are studied and gaps in adoption of technology by the farmers are analyzed. In
order to achieve higher production targets during the period of 11th Five-Year plan, the projections
of production of crops, milk, eggs, meat and fish are made. Accordingly, the strategies and activity
plan are prepared to achieve the projected targets.
1 Adopted Methodology
Keeping the above objectives and guidelines, the district plan has been prepared considering
the various parameters and modalities. As stated earlier, a ‘holistic and visionary approach’ is
needed for agriculture sector development. Hence, while preparing the CDAP, almost all the
sectors/programmes concerning rural development, farming and vulnerable sections have been
taken into consideration. The important sectors/programmes include: horticulture; fishery; animal
husbandry; minor irrigation; watershed; agricultural marketing; technology and extension; rural
industries, rural credit etc. The CDAP for XII Five-Year Plan is prepared keeping the Five-Year Plan
parameters as benchmark. The main problems encountered in the agricultural sector namely,
investment, gaps in the yields, production and productivity levels, infrastructure, technology and
extension, interdependence of various sectors etc. have been documented and analyzed in detail as
mentioned through a rigorous process as mentioned below. For the systematic and scientific
planning, a SWOT analysis of the district has been done. Further, growth drivers of the district, the
innovative schemes suitable and supportive for higher growth in agriculture are included in the plan.
The data base of the plan is both quantitative and qualitative. The former is based on
secondary sources, and the latter on the observations and discussions held with various
7
stakeholders like progressive farmers, elected representatives of Panchayat raj institutions (PRIs) at
different levels, voluntary and non-governmental organizations. The CDAP is prepared broadly on
the framework suggested by the Planning Commission i.e. decentralized and integrated approach.
As per this direction, the plan preparation began with consultation process with stakeholders at
different stages starting from the village (grama panchayat) level. The consultations began with
leaders/model farmers, presidents and vice presidents and knowledgeable members of GPs. The
same method was adopted at the TP and ZP levels. In particular, the members of Standing
Committees for planning and agriculture were actively involved through out the preparation of the
CDAP. The concerned district Ministers were also consulted during the preparation of the plan. An
exclusive planning team was constituted by the Chief Executive Officer of the ZP under the overall
supervision of the Chief Planning Officer of ZP. Above all, guidance and advice was sought from time
to time from the Scientists of the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore and Economists and
Experts in Decentralisation of the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore. The senior
Officers of the Department of Agriculture at the state level were also provided opportunities for
interactive discussions on the draft plan; they gave useful inputs and suggestions from time to time.
1. Orientation of district level officers on 4 % growth rate
District level committee of ATMA includes district level officers of agriculture and line
departments, scientists from Agriculture University & its Zonal Research Stations and NGO's. The
resolution of 53rd National Development Council and the need for reorientation of agricultural
developmental strategies were discussed. The job of preparation of developmental strategies of line
departments was assigned to respective departments.
2. Collection of information and calculation of growth rate of agriculture and allied
sectors.
Agriculture is usually the largest commodity producing sector of a district’s economy. Animal
Husbandry is closely interwoven with agriculture and plays an important complementary role in the
rural economy. It provides high quality food (milk, meat and eggs), wool, fiber and manure, in
addition to providing employment or supplementary income to a vast majority of the rural
population. The agriculture sector includes all agricultural products like crop, horticultural output
which includes vegetables, fruits and flower output and their by-products plus all the products from
animal husbandry sector.
Animals are generally fed together. Farmers usually do not keep separate account of the
outputs of agricultural crops and the part goes as inputs for feeding the animals. The estimates of
inputs cannot then be prepared separately. Thus, the Directorate of Economics and Statistics
prepared the value added estimates for the overall activity of agriculture, animal husbandry and
fisheries separately by using the following formula-
Value Added= (Value of output - Value of input)
Value of output of a particular crop = Price x Output produced or procured
whichever relevant
For estimating the value of output from the agricultural sector, there are three major categories:
8
a) Agricultural output sold in the open market
b) Agricultural output procured by the Government.
c) Agricultural by-product
Relevant variables for prices
a) Post harvest price of each variety of crops
b) Respective quantity produced
c) Procurement price of each crop
d) Amount procured for each crop
e) Price procured for each crop
f) Amount of by-product produced per ton of the relevant crops
Set of guiding principles for projections
Setting Targeted Growth Rate
1. Where Trend Growth Rate is less than Minimum Required growth rate then the Minimum
Required growth rate shall be Targetted Growth Rate used for future projections.
2. Where is trend growth rate is > or = Minimum Required Growth Rate then the trend
growth rate is the targetted growth rate.
3. Where trend growth rate is less than Minimum Required Growth Rate then the Minimum
Required Growth Rate becomes the targetted Growth Rate.
Base value for future projection
1. Last three years Value shall be used as base for future projection values.
2. If the average of three years is less than the value of last year then the last years
value shall be taken as the base year for calculating future projection values.
1
Chapter II
General Information of Ratnagiri District
2
Map 2.1 Ratnagiri District
KOLHAPUR DISTRICT
ARABIAN SEA
S A H Y A D R I R A N G E
RAIGAD DISTRICT
SINDHUDURG DISTRICT
SATARA DISTRICT
3
Chapter II
General Information of Ratnagiri District
2.1 General Statistics
Table 2.1 General Information of Ratnagiri District
In-habitated
Un-in habitated
Mandangad 109 - 109 42576 54 31412 39181 70593 804 3169
Dapoli 176 - 176 86339 106 88093 105337 193430 3772 10658Khed 215 - 215 101610 114 91710 102805 194515 3404 2081Chiplun 165 - 165 63603 130 135062 146019 281081 5369 1827Guhagar 121 - 121 111613 63 66724 75535 142259 1721 370Ratnagiri 199 - 199 125117 96 148056 154205 302261 3113 1088Sangmeshwar 198 - 198 92796 128 98109 116710 214819 2771 408Lanja 122 - 122 73930 56 51866 61287 113153 1641 215Rajapur 238 - 238 118849 101 83466 101200 184666 1957 295Total 1543 0 1543 816433 848 794498 902279 1696777 24552 20111
Source:- District social & economical status 2005-06
General Population (As per the 2011 Census)Taluka Villages No. of
Revenue Villages
Area (sq. km)
Gram Panchayat
Male Female Total S.C. S.T.
Table 2.2. Land Utilization Statistics
Sr.No.
Taluka Geographical Area
Forest Area
Land under Non-Agri. use
Culturable
Waste
Permanent
Pasture
Misc. Trees & Groves
Other Fallow
Net Sown Area
Area sown more than once
Gross Cropped
Area
Cropping Intensity
(%)
Culturable Area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 151 Mandangad 42576 123 554 3524 1254 620 741 27276 1840 29116 68.385945 32815
2 Dapoli 86339 0 2154 17304 11649 335 7519 25281 1230 26511 30.705707 62558
3 Khed 101610 3622 2375 29532 1948 528 15559 30397 1355 31752 31.248893 77264
4 Guhagar 63603 0 1559 20420 2616 235 309 18685 9689 28374 44.611103 42965
5 Chiplun 111613 240 3317 20610 2315 233 471 56666 2580 59246 53.08163 82745
6 Sangmeshwar 125117 0 4037 10868 16808 904 17562 39562 3775 43337 34.63718 850797 Ratnagiri 92796 0 3155 23344 9790 695 9042 12642 2810 15452 16.65158 529138 Lanja 73930 1049 1162 21590 2534 400 14585 13515 2310 15825 21.405383 523909 Rajapur 118849 826 2569 68273 1837 616 116 31163 8923 40086 33.728513 102905
816433 5860 20882 215465 50751 4566 65904 255187 34512 289699 35.4835 591634
Land Utilisation Statistics- (Preceding Three Years Average)District- Ratnagiri
Dist- Ratnagiri
4
Map 2.2 Agro-Ecological Situations of Ratnagiri District
5
Table 2.3 Land Use Capability Classification in Ratnagiri District
Table 3 : Land Capability ClassificationTaluka Class- I Class-
II Class- III Class-
IV Class-
VClass-
VIClass-
VII Class-
VIIITotal
Geographical Area1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8
Mandangad 0 141 4218 12836 147 22463 713 0 40518Dapoli 0 337 15094 33644 65 35454 2158 6254 93006Khed 0 48 8526 33407 285 37940 1980 0 82186Guhagar 0 3154 17423 29843 133 44215 3606 1234 99608Chiplun 0 686 10493 18526 500 26373 2722 253 59553Sangmeshwar 0 606 12032 27565 428 58133 14674 1658 115096Ratnagiri 0 162 6999 11282 2174 35731 29760 0 86108Lanja 0 2183 5468 36699 300 18361 3518 4543 71072Rajapur 0 3225 6099 31377 1306 41271 22302 10079 115659Total Area of District 0 10545 86356 235184 5344 319948 81441 24028 762846Remaining Area 53587Class-I : Very good cultivable land Class-II :Good Cultivable Land Class-III : Moderately Good Cultivable LandClass-IV : Fairly good land, suited for occasional cultivation Class-V : Nearly level land not suitable for cultivation because of stoniness, wetness, etc.
District Ratnagiri
Table 2.4. Classification of Land Holders in Ratnagiri District
Number of
holdings
Per cent of
holdings
Area (ha)
Percent area
1 Marginal (upto 1.00 ha) 14707 7.85 51046 6.562 Small (1.0 to 2.0 ha) 84299 44.99 150924 19.413 Medium (2.0 to 4.0 ha) 34761 18.55 134081 17.244 Large (4.0 to 5.0 ha) 13929 7.43 62174 7.995 Very large (above 5.0 ha) 39694 21.18 379503 48.86 Landless (number only) 55500 - - -
Total 1,87,390 - 7,77,728 -Source: 1998-99 District socio-economic survey, SREP, ATMA, Ratnagiri
Sl No. Size of holding Operational holding (No. and area in ha)Table 4 : Distribution of operational land holdings in Ratnagiri district
6
7
Table 7. Soil Fertility Index of Ratnagiri District
Very low low Medium Medium High High Very
high Very low low Medium Medium High High
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 Mandangad 2455 667 577 126 93 225 767 830 864 608 148 52 Dapoli 3361 828 653 142 160 319 1259 1221 1100 733 290 113 Khed 1949 549 372 82 107 151 688 711 505 491 237 04 Guhagar 1287 258 217 47 43 116 606 517 503 230 25 105 Chiplun 2756 521 523 217 200 280 1015 1147 929 469 190 176 Sangmeshwar 2237 493 418 153 94 184 895 1004 635 438 149 57 Ratnagiri 3942 736 763 147 208 324 1764 1667 1129 827 263 488 Lanja 1702 358 322 80 103 179 660 658 588 341 112 39 Rajapur 2260 293 333 87 153 310 1084 1025 676 471 84 4
Total 21949 4703 4178 1081 1161 2088 8738 8780 6929 4608 1498 103
Very low low Medium Medium High High Very
high Acidic General Acidic
Above acidic General Critical Injurious
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 Mandangad 6 34 121 271 342 1681 1521 934 0 2446 8 12 Dapoli 9 101 224 440 441 2146 1985 1376 0 3336 25 03 Khed 8 44 126 268 248 1255 1171 778 0 1931 18 04 Guhagar 0 9 56 131 180 911 898 389 0 1274 12 15 Chiplun 9 77 176 324 346 1824 1761 994 1 2739 16 1
6 Sangmeshwar 8 33 138 276 298 1484 1395 842 0 2232 5 0
7 Ratnagiri 52 195 328 535 515 2317 2737 1205 0 3852 89 18 Lanja 11 44 113 209 239 1086 1263 439 0 1702 0 09 Rajapur 6 42 94 251 323 1544 1726 534 0 2250 10
Total 579 1376 2705 2932 14248 14457 7491 1 21762 183 4
PH
Source:- Available from Taluka Agri. Office.
Coductivity (E.C )Sr. No. Taluka
Available Potash
Table No 5Soil Fertility Index District Ratnagiri
Sr. No. Taluka
No of Soil
Samples
Organic carbon Available Phospphorus
Table 8. Micronutrient Status of Soils in Ratnagiri District
Sr. No. Name of the Taluka
No of Soil Samples Analysed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111 Mandangad 120 120 1 120 2 120 0 120 1112 Dapoli 123 123 1 123 16 123 0 123 973 Khed 16 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 74 Guhagar 92 92 2 92 1 92 1 92 835 Chiplun 157 157 0 157 3 157 1 157 1136 Sangmeshwar 108 108 0 108 1 108 0 108 1047 Ratnagiri 79 79 1 79 7 79 5 79 698 Lanja 53 53 0 53 0 53 1 53 359 Rajapur 113 110 7 50 2 50 0 113 102
Total 861 858 12 798 32 798 8 861 721
Copper (cu ) Iron (Fe ) Mangenese (Mn ) Zinc (Zn )
8
2.2. Crops in the District
A. Cereals
1. Paddy (Jaya, Ratna, Sahyadri, Ratnagiri 24, Phalguna
2. Nagli, 3. Wari
B. Pulses
1. Toor, 2. Udid, 3.Waal, 4. Pawta, 5. Kulith, 6. Moong, 7. Chavli,
C. Oilseeds
1. Karala, 2. Sesamum, 3. Groundnut
D. Horticulture
1. Mango – Alphonso, 2. Cashew – Vengurla – 4,7,1 and indegenous.
3. Coconut – Banavli, T X D, 4. Sapota, 5. Kokum, 6. Ramphal, 7. Karwanda, 8. Jamun
9. Jackfruit, 10. Arecanut, 11. Banana – Non Descript 5 varieties, Grand 9, Basrai
12. Pinapple
E. Vegetables
1. Lady finger, 2. Green Leaf Vegetables, 3. Brinjal, 4. Chillies, 5. Bottle Gourd, 6. Raddish
7. Red Pumpkin, 8. Snake Gourd, 9. Ridge Gourd, 10. Drum Stick, 11. Watermelon, 12. Musk Melon,
13. Cucumber, 14. Knolcole, 15. Sponge Gourd.
F. Floriculture
1. Gerbera, 2. Carnecium, 3. Anthurium, 4. Lilies, 5. Marigold
9
Map 2.4 Taluka Wise Cropping Pattern in Rabi Crops in Ratnagiri District
10
G. Spices
1. Pepper, 2 Turmeric - Ordinary, Mango Variety, 3. Nutmeg, 4. All Spices, 5. Clove, 6. Cinnamon
2.3. Breeds in the District
Animal Husbandry
1. Cows – Non-Discript, Jersey, Holstein Friesian, Gir.
2. Buffaloes – Non-Descript, Murrah, Mehsana, Surti, Jafrabadi, Pandarpuri
3. Hen – Rhode Island Red, Black Millork, Giriraj, Kadaknat, Aseel, Broiler
4. Goat – Usmanabadi, Non-Descript, Konkan Kanyal.
2.4. Fish Varieties in the District
1. Marine
a. Pomfret – Black , Silver, b. Prawn – Tiny, White, Pollen, Tiger, Baby
c. Lobster, d. Seer fish, e. Tuna, f. Mackerel, g. Cat Fish, h. Cuttle fish – Octopus, Squid
i. Ribbon Fish, j. Dhomak. Bombil, J. Shark
i. Musscels - Kalvi, Shindane, Sea Shells 2 Varieties Ordinary, Tasre, j. Sardine
k. Eel, l. Pink Pearch, m. Sole fish, n. Croackers, o. Rock Cod,
p. Crab – Silla Sereta, Silla Trancunerica, Sea Variety
2. Fresh Water
a. Rohu, b. Katla, c. Mrigal, d. Maral, e. Wam, f. Katarana, g. Kolshi, h. Crabs, i. Prawns
3. Ornamental
a. Gold Fish, b. Black Mollies, c. Sucker Fish, d. Tiger Bar, e. Guppies, f. Hockey Stick
g. Neontetra, h. Discus
Acivities in the District
Activities in Ratnagiri District would be stated hereinunder as
Agriculture is subsistance, Horticulture, Fisheries and Tourism are Major Growth Drivers in the
DIstrict have changed the face of the District, halted Migration and the district now suffers from
lack of skilled and unskilled labour in these sectors. These sectors now import labour such as
Migrants from UP (for Cashew Seed Collection) and Nepal (for Alphonso Mango Orchards and
fisheries)
A. Agriculture Agriculture to date is mainly subsistance in nature. Since Agriculture in the Konkan is mainly
rainfed with rainfall being assured Kharif is the major activity in the agricultural calander in the
Ratnagiri District. With little area under irrigation, Rabi and Summer Cultivation is limited to those
areas under well irrigation and other sources of irrigation.
Rice, Nagli and Wari are the major cultivated cereals. With little variation in cropping pattern,
lack of value addition and development in the cereals the sector is stagnant in terms of a major
sector being a growth driver. Local production is mainly for self consumption and fails to satisfy the
needs of the town, taluka head quarters, main rural markets. Cereals and Pulses sold in these
markets is i
11
12
Map 2.5 Taluka Wise Cropping Pattern in Kharif Crops in Ratnagiri District
Imported from outside regions. There is crop diversion towards horticulture crops such as Banana
for Paddy and Cashew and Alphonso in Nagli growing areas.
Table 2.7 Crop Wise Area and Its Percentage of Total Area Sr No Crop Area % of
Total Area
% of Seasonal Area
Product-ion (Metric Tonnes)
Productivity (In Kgs)
A Kharip 1 Paddy 78000 69.70% 75.4% 210918 2527 2 Nagli 20478 16.15% 17.4% 25418 1244 3 Other Cereal Crops 7300 6.49% 7.03% 3223 634 4 Oilseeds
Total Kharip Crops 103763 92.34% 100% 239559 B Rabi Waal 3767 5.43% 73.84% 1396 500 Tur 500 474 549 Kulith 433 216 500 Udid 283 277 979 Vegetable Cultivation 1060 0.94% 12.84% GroundNut 100 0.09% 1.21% Other Pulse Crops 100 0.09% 1.21% 5010 501 8260 7.35% 100%
C Summer Cultivation Paddy 100 0.09% 33.33% Groundnut 200 0.18% 66.67% 380 1909 Total Summer Crops 300 0.27% 100%
112323 100% 100% B. Horticulture
It is the major growth Driver in Ratnagiri District. State Government is implementing
Employment Guarantee Scheme since 1990-91 in the district. The area of 1,25,253 ha is covered
under this scheme till 2011-12. About 1,49,124 beneficiaries have taken advantage of the scheme.
Agriculture department has spent Rs. 12428.56 lakh on the scheme and 109.66 lakes man-days
have been generated since its inception.
Alphonso Mango:- Alphonso Mango has changed the face of the district. Its exquisite taste and
the aroma have left left the world mesmerised. Good Organic Soil Management results in reduced
pest and disease attack and superior quality Mango with high sweetness and greater keeping
quality. Inferior quality results from unmanaged farms, lack of soil managament and incessant use
of Paclobutrozol and excessive use of pesticides and fungicides, Improper harvesting and spongy
tissue. Organised Plantations and the Farm Based processing Units have guaranteed men and
women farm labourers round the year employment. In fact the sector starves from farm labour
shortage. For marketing it is mainly exported to markets in Mumbai, Pune and Western
Maharashtra. Progressive Farmers are into Brand Building and Private Market as well. Marketing in
13
Map 2.6 Taluka Wise Rainfall Zones in Ratnagiri District
14
Local Markets is unorganized. Innovative Farmers have gone in for GLOBALGAP certification.
But export to the International Market is only just picking up. Gaps remain in forward linkages in
terms of Grading, Packing and Marketing of the produce. Due to lack of crop management the
Alphonso Mango suffers from Glut often. Huge quantities of the produce are also exported and
processed locally for Canning Purposes. Local Processors also go for value addition such as Slices
made from Pulp, Mango Sweets etc. Two ISO certified units are located at Pawas and a Aseptic
Units also functions from MIDC, Ratnagiri. A Majority of the small and medium farms are under
lease with traders. Such plantations suffer from lack of soil management and the incessant Use of
Paclobutrozol for reaping sustained produce. Traders in APMC markets of Mumbai, Pune and
Western Maharashtra finance such lease traders. Ratnagiri, Rajapur, Guhagar, Dapoli are major
Alphonso Pockets. Plantations are found on hill slopes and on laterite soil after blasting the same to
create craters and filling the same with imported soil to plant.
Cashew:- A poor farmers crop it is a major crop in Lanja, Sangmeshwar, Chiplun, Khed,
Mandangad and all those areas beyond 15 kilometers from the sea coast. Vengurla varieties give
good seed count and also produce. Cashew grown locally gives good outturn epecially the vengrula
varieties. Low capacity of farmers and small local processors to hold produce results in exprort of
raw material to southern states of Karnataka and Goa. Organised Plantations are better managed
with fences and compounds, irrigation and use of organic material such as vermicompost and other
compost to maintain soil fertility. Cashew apple which is major part of Cashew Produce is perishable
goes waste unlike in Goa where it is used to extract Alcohol.
Both the above sectors suffer from lack of cooperation.
Coconut:-Crop suffers from dense plantation and lack of management. But the coconut grown in
the Konkans is exquisite in taste and sweetness. There is a major gap in demand and supply since
the districts is a high coconut consuming area. As such there is no processing into healthy, dried
coconut, Cold Pressed Coconut oil and all coconut based processed products are imported from
outside regions and states. Tendeer Coconut is still highly unavailable in the markets except at
tourist places. Weaving of the coconut leaf was traditionally a major activity the coatal belt used for
various purposes from walls for house construction to roof tops for boats. But the industry is going
down. Skining of the leaflets of the coconut leaf to make brooms is carried out in some quantity.
The sap extracted from Coconut palms is medicinal in nature and sweet, when brewed in Maddy is a
savoured Beverage akin to Beer. The Maddy fro Guhagar Taluka is a distnct brand in itself in
Mumbai.
Kokum:- health benefits are acknowledged but no organised Plantations have developed. As such
procurement of raw material for processors and Kokam Juice makers is an issue.
Arecanut:- Mainly concentrated in the seacoasts especially Ratnagiri, Guhagar, Dapoli &
Mandangad. Local Procurement and sold in local market. Since the district is a heavy consumer of
bettle leaf. Demand outstrips supply. It is also a intercrop in Coconut Plantation.
Jackfruit:- Two Varieties of good quality jack fruit suffers since its harvesting collides with the
Alphonso. Exported to Mumbai , Pune and Western Maharashtra. Processed Products such as Slices
from Jackfruit Pulp and Fried Chipps in Coconut Oil are a delicacy. No Organised Plantation due to
marketing limitations. But maintained in compounds for its timber utility in house construction.
Sapota: -Sapota is a minor crop but is rich in taste and has a good price in the local market.
15
Table 2.8 Crop wise details up to the year 2011-12 in Ratnagiri district
Sr. No. Crop Total area (ha)
Productive area (ha)
Production in M.Tonnes
1 Mango 65109 58832 117664 2 Cashew 91030 79163 1187445 3 Sapota 123 92 92 4 Coconut 5165 4708 529 5 Kokam 157 96 96 5 Jack Fruit 113 78 468 6 Arecanut 961 764 764
Total 162658 143733 1307058 Availability of grafts and support services:- There are 7 Government nurseries, 5 nursery of Agriculture University and 91 private licensed nurseries in the district. Table 2.9 Total number of grafts & seedling available for the year 2011-12
Sr. No. Crop Available planting material Govt University Private Total
1 Mango 80,000 1,50,000 5,00,000 7,30,000 2 Cashew 1,00,000 2,50,000 5,00,000 8,50,000 3 Sapota 75,000 25,000 30,000 1,30,000 4 Coconut 16,850 30,000 15,000 61850 5 Kokam 1,000 1,000 - 2,000 6 Jack Fruit - - - - 7 Arecanut 23,250 10,000 - 33,250
Total 3,13,500 4,26,000 10,70,000 18, 09,500 C. Vegetables:- Vegetable Cultivation is a backward area with most vegetable demand being met by imports
from neighboring districts. Kitchen Gardens cultivate leafy vegetables, lady finger, gourds, cluster
beans, cucumber for mainly home consumption a small surplus of which comes to the market
seasonally as the end of monsoon approaches. Considering the vast demand and potential farmers
who have irrigation facilities in vicinity to the town or weekly bazaar locations are going for
vegetable cultivation on small scale. Yet there is a wide gap in demand and local supply. Due to
heavy rainfall there are limitations to cultivating vegetables except cucumber, ladies finger and
guord varieties in the monsoon.
D. Floriculture:- Use of flowers in various functions is of recent origin since the inception of the
National Horticulture Mission. It has created demand for flowers. Area under open floriculture along
with green houses produce Rose, Marigold and Jarbera new introductions i.e. gladiolus, aster,
gerbera, carnations etc. is, therefore, increasing. Total area under floriculture is 80 hectares. Green
Houses are mainly concentrated in the Chiplun, Ratnagiri, Guhagar and Dapoli Areas, . The sector
offers tremendous scope for employment and entrepreneurship. Group consolidation and Marketing
are issues to be addressed.
16
E. Spices:- Pepper is the major crop grown in this category. Along with pepper nutmeg and
cinnamon, turmeric are taken in the district. Pepper, Nutmeg and Cinnamon are mainly cultivated as
mixed crops in the Coconut Plantations. About 200 ha area is under spices crops. Cropwise area and
production is as under-
Table 2.10 Crop-wise area, production and productivity of spices in Ratnagiri District (Year = 2011-12)
Sr. No.
Spices Crop Area (ha)
Productive Area (ha)
Productivity (Mt)
1 Pepper 97.00 82.00 7.38 2 Cardamom 94.00 68.00 0.06 3 Nutmeg 69.00 49.00 0.03 4 Cinnamon N.A. N.A. N.A. 5 All Spice N.A. N.A. N.A.
Total 260.00 137.00 7.47 F. Medicinal & Aromatic Plants:- Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants is started for
the last 5 years in the district. The cultivation of safed-musli, ashwagandha, citronella, lemon grass,
kawach, have been undertaken on a pilot basis.
G. Food Processing:- The regions curns out the largest variety of processed foods based on
fruits. Small processing units dot the entire region from Pulp to Pickles to Papads. Only that
processing is small scale affecting the marketing ability and capacity to generate economic wealth is
thereby limited. There is a tremendous paucity of trained personnel in the food processing sector.
Agricutural Collecges are now offerring cources in food processing.
The information on agro processing facilities available in and outside the district but serving the
need of the district is given below-
Table 2.11 Agro-processing facilities in Ratnagiri district
No. Commodity processing units
functioning units
Commodities processed
1. Fruits 2127 1997 Mango, cashew, kokam
2. Fish 3 3 Fish, Prawns
3. Bakery 14 14 Flour
4. Flour product 5 5 Papad, coconut etc.
5. Milk products 5 5 Milk
6. Rice mill 19 19 Paddy
There are 2127 fruit processing units of mango, cashew, kokam etc. in the district for
preparation of pulp, syrup, poli, jam, jelly etc. There are also 19 rice mills, three fish processing
units existing in the district.
Storage facilities :
The storage facilities available in the district are mainly provided by the District Collector at
each block (tahsil) i.e. nine storages for grain. There are four cold storages available in the district
for the perishable products such as milk and milk products. The information regarding availability of
storage facilities in the district in given in Table 2.12.
17
Table 2.12 : Storage facilities available in the district Sr No
Name of agency
Location of storage facilities
Commodities Capacity Installed Functioning
1. Maharashtra Warehousing Corporation
Ratnagiri Grains 1 Big capacity
5000 ton
1
2. Collector Block H.Q Grains 20 medium capacity 2800 ton
9
3. Cold storage Ratnagiri, Chiplun, Lanja, Sangameshwar
Milk 4 4
Note : Small storages 12 Capacity 1200 tons Medium Storage 8 Capacity 2800 tons Big Storage 1 Capacity 5000 tons
M. Farmers Groups and Organizations :
There are __________farmers groups and organizations prevailing in the district. These
groups and organizations are mainly related with agriculture and water supply. The groups for
agriculture are mainly performing the activity regarding supply of agricultural inputs to the farmers,
fruit processing of cashewnut and processing and marketing of cashewnut seed and supply of
irrigation water through the lift irrigation schemes. There are seven co-operative societies existing in
Ratnagiri tahsil, three in Lanja, four in Rajapur and two in Khed tahsil of Ratnagiri district.
In addition to the co-operative societies for agriculture and water supply, 39 co-operative
fishermen’s societies, 214 co-operative dairy societies, one milk federation and 14 non government
organizations are prevailing in the district.
Organizations :
1. NGOs : There are 18 NGOs working for the farming community at grass root level. These NGOs
undertake watershed development projects, health services, Technology transfer, educating and
training villagers, organizing women and forming SHG etc. But their presence in the Agriculture and
allied sectors is weak.
2. Self Help Groups (SHG) : There are 6031 Women’s Self Help Groups in Ratnagiri District
formed on the initiative of the DRDA, Zilla Parishad and Taluka Level Panchayat Samitis through the
Gram Panchayats and the Non- Governmental NGOs. These SHGs mainly comprise of women. They
have a revolving fund for their emergency needs. Although the aim is to make the women self
reliant and entreprenueral through the SHGs there is a basic lack of perception amongst the NGOs
that the women are agriculturists and already into allied activities and that the agriculture and allied
sector are the sectors through which there capacity building and group based economic should be
the point of focus.
3. Mumbai based Ratnagiri Gram Vikas Mandals : Their basic work comprises of financial
support to the village mandals for building temples, drinking water schemes, village roads etc. Now
a days they even market the mango fruits from their villages at Mumbai. They need to be organised
18
in a proper way for further marketing of not only mango but also of other horticultural cops, spices,
medicinal plants, ornamental fishes etc. in a systematic manner.
4. Mahila Mandals : These are totally women organisations which occasionally undertake
cultural programmes such as Haldi-Kumkum etc. and are non functional for rest of the year. These
mandals can be used to bring the women folk forward in the groups already formed by them and
utilize them for various enterprises suited to them.
5. Yuva Mandals : These are organisations formed by youngsters for sports, cultural and other
allied activities. Thus, all these organisations can be utilized in an integrated manner for the
marketing of the agricultural products, co-operative production, post harvest technology etc.
N. Agricultural Research Activity and Training Institutes: Dr. Balasaheb Sawant
Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli (the erstwhile Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth) was established on 18th
May, 1972 to cater the needs of teaching, research and extension education in agriculture and allied
sectors in the Konkan region. The jurisdiction of the University extends over five districts namely
Thane, Raigad, Ratnagiri, Sindhudurg and Greater Mumbai. At present, , In the recent past private
Agricutural colleges have come up in Devrukh, Savarda (Taluka Sangameshwar) and Nivli Palwan
(Taluka Chiplun)
O. Animal Husbandry Table 2.13 Livestock in Ratnagiri district (as per Livestock Census 2003)
Rearing of local cows and buffaloes for milk and milk products is secondary occupation to
agriculture. Good quality buffaloes are reared around viscinity of towns . In villages animals are
mostly reared in let loose condition and these animals wander all over for search of food. These
creates problem for successful Artificial insemination programme as well as acheiving 100 %
vaccination target. Lack of irrigation facilities prevents proper fodder development.
Animal Health Care:
In order to take preventive measures against epidemic diseases of livestock, the Department
provides veterinary services. Details of veterinary infrastructure available as on 31st march 2007 are
given in the table below-
Table 2.14 Veterinary facility center as on 31st march, 2008 Sr. No. Category Number
1 District veterinary polyclinic 1 2 Taluka mini veterinary policlinic 4 3 Veterinary dispensaries grade 1 21 4 Grade 2 dispensaries 126 5 Mobile veterinary clinic 2 6 Regional Disease Diagnostic Laboratory 1 Total 155
Sr. No. Type of Animal Number 1 Cow class Cross Bred 25573
Cow class Indigenous 455553 2 Buffalo class 61431 3 Goat 38498 4 Sheep 30 5 Total Poultry 1068615
19
P. Dairy Dairy is the major activity under animal husbandry department. Average requirement of milk
according to NDDB’s norms, per capita liquid milk + dairy products is 250 ml.
Considering a consumption of 120 ml of milk per person daily the consumption stands at 2,23,970
litres. The supply in the district falls short by 30 to 35 %. This shortage if fulfilled by Milk
Federations from Outside the district who market between 80-90 Thousand litres of milk every day.
Fig :2.15a Structure of Dairy Farming in Ratnagiri District Sr
No. Scheme Milk
Handling Capacity
Talukas Facilities Collection Routes
1 MIDC Mirjole, Ratnagiri
20,000 Ratnagiri, Lanja, Sangmeshwar, Rajapur
Processing- Plastic Bag Packing
6
2 Chiplun, MIDC Mirjole,
40,000 Mandangad, Khed, Dapoli, Chiplun, Guhagar
Processing- Plastic Bag Packing
7
3 Lanja 5,000 Lanja, Rajapur Cooling Milk 3 4 Sadavli,
Taluka Sangmeshwar,
5,000 Sangmeshwar Cooling Milk 2
According to the District Socio-Economic Survey 2005-06 daily collection of the government dairies
was 7726 litres of milk per day. There are 207 milk cooperatives with 24638 members.
Q. Fisheries The fisheries sector plays an important role in the development of the district economy. Ratnagiri District has long coastline of 167 km. covering 104 villages having continental shelf of 6600 square km. However, fishing activity is being carried out only in 2910 square km. i.e. upto 80 meters deep water due to non availability of big vessels. The balance area of 3690 square km. i.e.80 to 200 meter deep water remain inoperative. Fishing is major activity in the coastal blocks of Ratnagiri with fishermen population of 67615. the population of active fishermen is 25286 as per latest census. According to the District Socio Economic Survey, Annual production was 100000 tones and a financial turnover of fishing activity amounted to Rs 235 crore in the district The details regarding block/village coverage at the coastline is as under :- Block/Village coverage at the Ratnagiri District coastline
Block Coastline in Kms. Villages Landing centers Mandangad 20 5 1 Dapoli 35 15 13 Guhagar 38 19 14 Ratnagiri 56 40 19 Rajapur 18 17 3
Total 167 96 50 Annual average capture of fish during the previous six years are as under
Fisheries Production in Ratnagiri for the period 2007-08 to 2011-12
Sr.No. Year Capture in M. Tonnes
1 2006-2007 1,09,055 2 2007-2008 85,099 3 2008-2009 72,317
20
4 2009-2010 75,122 5 2010-2011 95,590 6 2011-2012 88,438
R. Infrastructure facilities
1. Electricity:- Out of 1519 villages, 1515 villages (99.37%) were electrified. The total
electricity consumption in the district was 454830 thousand-kilowatt hours. Out of this, 27.75 % was
used for domestic purpose, 10.53 % for commercial purpose, 58.79 % for industries, 1.60 % for
agriculture and 1.33 % for public street lights and other uses. There was increase in electricity
consumption in 1997-98 over the previous year by14.29 %.
2. Transport and Communication:- In Ratnagiri district, there are three modes of transport
i.e. road, railway and sea. However, most of the transport is by road, followed by railway and very
limited by sea. The main Mumbai-Goa National highway (NH 17) passes through this district. The
total road length in the district is 5364 km, of which 2584 km is pucca in all weather and 2780 km
is kaccha. The road length per 100 sq. km area comes to 31 km. Considering kaccha road, this ratio
comes to 65 km. In case of railway, total broad guage length in Ratnagiri district is 176 km.
The passenger transport - Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (S.T. Bus) and
Konkan Railway. There are 1005 routes in the district on which S.T. buses run.
Regarding communication, 1519 villages have post and telegraph services available through
639 Post Offices and 152 Telegraph Offices. On an average one lakh population is served by 42
Post Offices. In addition, there are 23,884 telephones working in the district. The telecommunication
facility is expanding very fast in the district.
3. Co-operatives In the year 2012-13, there were 2759 co-operative institutions with 11,68,600 members. Out of the total co-operatives, 376 were primary agricultural credit societies. The total non-agricultural credit societies were 327 and remaining 2187 were non-credit
societies.
4. Agricultural Credit :
There are 376 primary agricultural credit societies in the district with a membership of 3,23,081. The number of borrowers was 53,620 who borrowed 3,43,003 lakh of short
term, medium term and long term loan. The proportion of borrower is quite low with average amount of Rs. 6396 per borrower.
5. Banks :- There is a District Central Co-operative Bank and Urban Co-operative Banks( 75
branches) in the district. There are 14 other banks in the district with 103 branches. The Bank of
India is the Lead Bank of the district.
6. Regulated Markets :- There is one regulated market at Ratnagiri, but now it is not
functioning as there is no marketable surplus of rice and nagli, which are the important cereal crops.
Ratnagiri district is deficit in foodgrain production. Mango is a commercial crop sold in important city
markets like Mumbai, Pune, etc. by the cultivator and pre harvest contractors through commission
agents. Local sale is unregulated due to lack of phsical infrastructure. Therefore, the market has not
been in working condition.
21
7. Soil Testing Laboratory : There is one soil testing laboratory in the district. Water testing and
NPK analysis as well as micronutrient analysis facilities are available in the laboratory. The
laboratory has prepared village wise fertility index of the district.
8. Milk Processing and Chilling Plants in Dairy Sector
There are no Milk Processing Plants in the district as a result all milk collected through
Government Procurement lines is sent to plants at Miraj for Processing and marketing.
III. 5 Details of financial Institution Banks / Cooperatives
Sr. No. Cooperation 1 Cooperative societies 2537 2 Agri. Primary Co-op Credit Soc. 383 3 Members of Agri. Primary Co-op Credit Soc 125636 4 Dairy Co-op Soc. 220 5 No. of kisan credit card holders 56,931 6 No. of commercial banks 112 7 No. of rural commercial banks 72 8 No. of semi urban commercial banks 40 9 Agricultural Financial Assistance from (in Lakh Rs) -Agri. Co-op Banks 3183 -Nationalized Banks (in crores) 10,300
As per district credit plan mentioned in Potential Linked Plan of NABARD for the year 2007-
08, the total outlay for the district is Rs. 47065.52 lakh of which total agriculture credit is Rs.
36742.35 lakh, short term credit is 28718.19 lakh and term loan for agriculture & allied activities
accounted for Rs. 8024.16 lakh.
22
Map 2.8 :- Maharashtra State showing Konkan Strip with Location of Ratnagiri District
23
1
District at a Glance 2.2.1 Location and Geographical Units
Ratnagiri district is one of the coastal districts of Konkan region in Maharashtra State, which
forms a narrow strip running from north to south along the western coast of India. The district has
north- south length of about 180 km and average east-west extension of about 64 km, except in its
extremities, which tapers to join the coast line.
District has a geopraphical area of 816433 square kilometres divided into nine talukas, 1543
revenue villages and 848 Gram Panchayats with no uninhabited villages in the district.
Table :2.21 Geographical area and Administrative Setup
Sr. No. District Information 1 Geographical area ( sq. Km) 8,326 2 No. of Talukas 9 3 No.of Panchayat Samities 9 4 Total villages 1,543 5 No. of villages ( inhabited) 1,543 6 No. of villages (Unhabituated) - 7 No. of villages ( electrified) 1,538 8 No. of villages connected by roads 1,429 9 Towns 10 10 Municipal Council + Corporation 4 11 Gram Panchayat ( includes Block G.P.) 848 12 Police stations 13 13 Police out-posts 29
(2001 Census)
The district has 10 town and several taluka headquarters which are inching their way
towards urbanization. A high number of villages are connected by roads and virtually all villages
except 5 are to be electrified.
Boundaries : Ratnagiri district is surrounded by Sahyadri hills in the east beyond which there are
Satara and Kolhapur districts, Raigad district in the north, the Arabian sea in the west and
Sindhudurg district in the south.
Population Density
As per the 2001 census, total land area of the district was 2.71 % of the state while
the population of the district was 1.75 % of the state. In comparison population density of
the district was 207 per square kilometre in comparison to the state population density of
315. Ratnagiri taluka had the highest population density of 267 per sq km while Lanja
taluka had the lowest density of 140 persons per sq km.
Percentage of Rural and Urban Population
88.67 percent population lives in the rural areas while 11.33 percent population lives in the urban
areas. While Mandangad and Sangmeshwar talukas are entirely rural the urban population Dapoli –
8.20%, Khed – 7.10 %, Chiplun – 20.25%, Guhagar – 2.25 %, Ratnagiri – 26.34 %, Lanja –
2
2.2.3 Topography and Agro Climatic Characteristics
Considering the physical features, Ratnagiri district can be divided into three parts
i.Coastal plains where the coconut and arecanut crops thrive well.
ii. Plateau surface which is used for cereal crops like rice and nagli.
iii. Hilly area of Sahyadri and its offshoots
Table2.23 : Sub-regionwise blocks of district
Sr. No. Coastal zone Plateau zone Hilly zone 1. Mandangad (W) Dapoli (E) Mandangad (E) 2. Dapoli (W) Khed (W) Khed (E) 3. Guhagar (W) Guhagar (E) Chiplun (E) 4. Ratnagiri (W) Ratnagiri (E) Sangmeshwar (E) 5. Rajapur (W) Chiplun (E), Sangmeshwar (E), Lanja (W) Lanja (E)
NOTE : E = East W = West
Over 85 per cent of the land surface in Ratnagiri district is hilly. All rivers in the district
originate in the Sahyadri ranges and flow from the east to west and merge with the Arabian sea.
The important rivers of the district are Vashisthi, Jagabudi Bay and Naringi.
Climatic conditions in the district are strongly influenced by its geographical conditions. Being
a coastal district, variation in the temperature during the day and throughout the season is not
large. Maximum temperature at the coast rarely goes above 38 0C and in the interior, it seldom
crosses 40 0C owing to proximity to the sea. Climate of the district is very humid and relative
humidity seldom goes below 50 per cent.
Total rainfall and its monthwise distribution is an important factor affecting crop production
and land use intensity. The average annual rainfall in the district is 3787 mm. Nearly 91 per cent of
rainfall is received in four months i.e. June to September. Therefore, crop production is
concentrated only in kharif season and there is very little cropping in rabi or hot weather season.
Since, the rainfall is very high and assured one, the kharif season crop is assured one. The
concentration of rainfall during four months coupled with lateritic soils has imposed restrictions on
availability of irrigation facilities and also drinking water in summer season. There are some post
monsoon rains in October and November, which enable to grow some rabi pulses and vegetables
after harvest of kharif rice on residual moisture. Rajapur (4616 mm) and Sangmeshwar (4785
mm) are the high rainfall receiving tahsils in Ratnagiri district.
3
Land Use pattern and Land holdings
a. Land Use Pattern
Land utilization pattern of a district explains the use of land resources in the district for
various purposes. Table 2.258 indicates the land utilization statistics of Ratnagiri District which is the
average of the last three years.
Of the total geographical area (816433 ha) of the district, total cultivable area is 72.46 %
(591634 ha). However, only 35.48% of the area is under cultivation (289699 ha), 2.56 % is put to
non agricultural uses (20,882 ha) and 26.39 % is culturable waste land (215465 ha) and 8% is
fallow (65,904). There, therefore, is wide scope to bring the cultivable waste under horticulture as
well as fallow land under cultivation in the district.
1. Forest area: At the district level total area under classified forest is only 5860 ha (or
0.71%) of total geographical area of district. At taluka level there is no classified area under
forest in talukas of Dapoli, Guhagar, Sangameshwar and Ratnagiri. Area of classified forest and its
percentage is highest 3.56% (3622 ha) in Khed Taluka while only one other taluka has more than 1%
area under classified forest while the area of the remaining three talukas is far lesser than 1%.
But there are substantial private lands with unclassified forests on them. While these forest are
cleared in the coastal talukas areas when they have to be brought under horticultural plantations.
There is rampant deforestation in talukas bordering the Sahyadri Range since the demand for
fuelwood from agriculturally developed region of western Maharashtra is strong and the monetary
incomes of a large number of resource poor farmers is low. Such cleared lands are either brought
under horticulture plantations and if the land titles are complicated there is sale of lands to the
resource rich sections of society.
2. Culturable Waste:- a considerable portion of total geographical area totalling 26.4% of
land area a major portion of which is Katal. Such lands can only be brought under horticulture
plantations. If cultivated scientifically all produces on such lands have been found to be superior in
taste and aroma.
3. Net and Grossed Cropped Area:- At the district level the net sown area is 255187
hectares forming about 31.2% of the district geographical area. Proportion of net sown area to
total geographical area is shown in table 2.25 below. The highest percentage of net sown area to
total geographcal area is in (64.06%) Mandangad taluka. While it is lowest (13.62) in Ratnagiri
taluka. As can be seen the NATURAL AVAILABILITY of Area available for Agriculture activities is
abmysally low in comparison to other districts and Maharashtra State whose net sown area was
58.33% in 1991 (source: Agriculture Census : 2000-01, GOM)
4
Taluka wise % of net sown area to total geographical area in Ratnagiri District
64.06
29.3818.28
26.2229.9229.28
50.77
13.62
31.62
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.00
Mandan
gad
Dapoli
Khed
Guhag
ar
Chiplun
Sangm
eshw
ar
Ratnag
iri
Lanja
Rajapu
r
Taluka-wise % Of Net Sown Area To Total Geographical Area Of Ratnagiri District.
4. Land Under Non-Agricultural Use:-Non-agricultural use is 2.55% of the total
Geographical area. But with increasing levels of urbanization, mass land acquisition for mega
industrial projects and large areas notified for proposed mining activities, ancilliary and service
industries which would crop up as a result the percentage is bound to go up considerably.
5
Table2.25:Land Utilization on pattern in Ratnagiri district
Sr.No. Taluka
Geographical Area
Forest Area
Land under Non-Agri. use
Culturable
Waste
Permanent
Pasture
Misc. Trees & Groves
Other Fallow
Net Sown Area
Area sown more than once
Gross Cropped
Area
Cropping Intensity
(%)
Cultivable Area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 151 Mandangad 42576 123 554 3524 1254 620 741 27276 1840 29116 106.75 32815
2 Dapoli 86339 0 2154 17304 11649 335 7519 25281 1230 26511 104.87 62558
3 Khed 101610 3622 2375 29532 1948 528 15559 30397 1355 31752 104.46 77264
4 Guhagar 63603 0 1559 20420 2616 235 309 18685 9689 28374 151.85 42965
5 Chiplun 111613 240 3317 20610 2315 233 471 56666 2580 59246 104.55 82745
6 Sangmeshwar 125117 0 4037 10868 16808 904 17562 39562 3775 43337 109.54 850797 Ratnagiri 92796 0 3155 23344 9790 695 9042 12642 2810 15452 122.23 529138 Lanja 73930 1049 1162 21590 2534 400 14585 13515 2310 15825 117.09 523909 Rajapur 118849 826 2569 68273 1837 616 116 31163 8923 40086 128.63 102905
816433 5860 20882 215465 50751 4566 65904 255187 34512 289699 113.52 591634Dist- Ratnagiri
6
b. Classification of Land:
Land Use Capability Classification in Ratnagiri District
Class- II 1%
Class- III11%
Class- IV31%
Class- V1%
Class- VI42%
Class- VII11%
Class- VIII3%
Class- II Class- III Class- IV Class- VClass- VIClass- VII Class- VIII
Figure 2.6 Land Use Capability Classification In Ratnagiri District
Note: District has no land under class I (Very Good Cultivable Land)
Further considering classification of land holdings, of total geographical area (8,16,433 hectares),
There is no land ‘Very good cultivable land’ in the district, while lands under Class –II are an
abmyssal 1.29 % (10545 hectares), Moderately good cultivable lands form a low 10.57% (86,356
hectares). 28.8% (2,35,184 hectares) is faily good land suited for occasional cultivation. More than
half of all lands are non cultivable for agriculture. This puts severe constraints on planning by way of
expansion, improving productivity and production in Crop Husbandry. Wherein only horticulture by
way of Cashew and Mango in Class-VI and Mango in Laterite Soil has been possible. As such
production and productivity in agriculture and horticulture can only be increased by improving soil
fertility and conserving water and soil.
Soils:- Predominant soils in the district are lateritic which vary in colour from bright red to
brownish red, owing to the preponderance of hydrated iron oxides. They are always acidic and fairly
well supplied with nitrogen and organic matter. They are porous, non-retentive of moisture and are
found all over the district except in Mandangad tahsil. The main grades are :
a) Soils useful for cultivation of rice crops.
b) Coastal alluvial, useful for coconut and arecanut gardens
c) Varkas soils, useful for mango and cashewnut cultivation
d) Saline lands locally called khar land or khajan, where salt tolerant rice varieties can be grown.
7
8
Table 2.26 Land Use Capability Classification in Ratnagiri District
Taluka Class- 1 Class- II Class- III Class- IV Class- V Class- VI Class- VII Class- VIIITotal
Geographical Area
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8Mandangad 0 141 4218 12836 147 22463 713 0 40518
Dapoli 0 337 15094 33644 65 35454 2158 6254 93006Khed 0 48 8526 33407 285 37940 1980 0 82186
Guhagar 0 3154 17423 29843 133 44215 3606 1234 99608Chiplun 0 686 10493 18526 500 26373 2722 253 59553
Sangmeshwar 0 606 12032 27565 428 58133 14674 1658 115096Ratnagiri 0 162 6999 11282 2174 35731 29760 0 86108
Lanja 0 2183 5468 36699 300 18361 3518 4543 71072Rajapur 0 3225 6099 31377 1306 41271 22302 10079 115659
Total Area of District
0 10545 86356 235184 5344 319948 81441 24028 762846
Remaining Area 53587Class-I : Very good cultivable land Class-II :Good Cultivable Land Class-III : Moderately Good Cultivable LandClass-IV : Fairly good land, suited for occasional cultivation Class-V : Nearly level land not suitable for cultivation because of stoniness, wetness, etc.Class-VI : Steep slopes, highly erosion prone with shallow soils Class-VII : Steep slope with sever soil erosion resulting in eroded stony and rough soil surfaces with shallow soil depth Class-VIII :
9
Table 2.27 : Classification of soils in Ratnagiri district (in ha )
Sl. No.
Block Red / lateritic
Alluvial Soils
Saline soils
Sodic Soils Alkaline Soils
1. Mandangad 42712.58 - 99.42 - -
2. Dapoli 86112.16 91.17 151.67 - -
3. Khed 101179.98 816.68 65.34 - -
4. Chiplun 78387.47 1615.73 30640.80 - -
5. Guhagar 51174.40 4724.18 7724.42 - -
6. Sangmeshwar 99453.46 153.04 25111.90 199.60 -
7. Ratnagiri 79932.22 1097.85 10567.22 283.83 393.88
8. Lanja 59287.32 - 10975.69 2986.82 664.17
9. Rajapur 95852.01 1082.62 21149.02 1294.12 133.23
Total 694091.60 9616.27 106485.4 4764.37 1191.28
Classification of soils in Ratnagiri district
85%
1%
13%
1%
0%
Red or lateritic SoilsAlluvial SoilsSaline soilsSodic SoilsAlkaline Soils
Figure 2.7 Classification Of Soils In Ratnagiri District
10
Figure 2.8:- Soil Fertility Index of Soils Analysed in Ratnagiri District
Figure 2.09 :- % wise Classification of Availability of Organic Carbon
Figure 2.10 :- % wise Classification of Figure 2.11 :- % wise Classification of
Availability of Phosphorous Availability of Potash
Table 2.28: Analysis of Soil Samples and Micronutrient Status
Extremely Low Low Medium Ordinarily
High High Extremely High
1 Organic Carbon 21.42% 19.03% 4.92% 5.28% 9.51% 39.81%1.91
Ordinarily High
2 Available Phosphorus 40.00% 31.56% 20.94% 6.82% 0.46% 0.14% 0.98 Low
3 Available Potash 0.49% 2.64% 6.26% 12.32% 13.35% 64.91% 2.65 High
Sr No Component/ Properties
Percentage of SamplesFertility Index
Since 2000-01-2006-07, 21949 soil samples were analysed for ordinary analysis and classified into
six categories. The component wise percentage & its fertility index as setout hereinbelow-
11
a. For Organic Carbon Availability in Soil Sample Catgory a high percentage of soil
samples fall under the ‘Extremely high’ (39.81%).
b. For Phosphorus Availability in Soil Samples a high percentage of soil samples fall
under ‘Extremely Low’ (40.00%) & 32% under low availability.
c. For Potash Availability in Soil Samples a high percentage of soil samples fall
under the ‘Extremely High ’ (64.91%).
As such availability of Available Phosphorus in Soil of Ratnagiri District is at critical level and
use of Phosphorus based fertilizers have to be used in adequate quantities. Considering Soil Fertility
in Ratnagiri District the fertility index of Organic Carbon is Moderately High (1.91), Available
Phosphorus is low (0.98) and Aviailable Potash is high (2.65). Considering the application of
fertilizers for crops dosage for Nitrogen shall have to be reduced by 10% than the dosage
recommended by the university. The dosage for Phosphorus shall have to be increased by 25% over
and above the dosage recommended by the university and the dosage for Potash shall have to be
reduced by 25% over and above the dosage recommended by the University.
The soil in Ratnagiri District is acidic in nature and the Ph of 65.86 percent of the soils
analyzed have been found to be acidic. 34.12 percent of samples have been found to be neutral and
no alkaline soils have been found in Ratnagiri district.
As a result of heavy rains in Ratnagiri District salts are washed away and they meet the seas.
Considering the soil samples analysed 99.28% of the soil are moderately saline. 0.83% of the soils
analysed have salinity at critical level and harmful levels of salinity to crops have been found in
0.01% of the soils.
From the year 2003-04 facilities for testing micronutrients have commissioned at the Soil
Testing Laboratory. In the period since then to the year 2006-07, 858 samples have been analysed
for availablity of Copper in the soil. In 98.60 percent samples Cooper was found to be sufficiently
available. 798 soil samples were analyzed for Iron, Manganese and Zinc availability of the soil of
which 95.98 % of the soils were found to contain sufficient quantities of iron and 98.99 % of the
soils were sufficient in Manganese. But only 16.26 percent had sufficient quantities of zinc available
and 83.74% of the soil samples were defficient in zinc.
12
Table 2.29 Soil Fertility Index of Ratnagiri District
Very low low Medium Medium High High Very
high Very low low Medium Medium High High
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 Mandangad 2455 667 577 126 93 225 767 830 864 608 148 52 Dapoli 3361 828 653 142 160 319 1259 1221 1100 733 290 113 Khed 1949 549 372 82 107 151 688 711 505 491 237 04 Guhagar 1287 258 217 47 43 116 606 517 503 230 25 105 Chiplun 2756 521 523 217 200 280 1015 1147 929 469 190 176 Sangmeshwar 2237 493 418 153 94 184 895 1004 635 438 149 57 Ratnagiri 3942 736 763 147 208 324 1764 1667 1129 827 263 488 Lanja 1702 358 322 80 103 179 660 658 588 341 112 39 Rajapur 2260 293 333 87 153 310 1084 1025 676 471 84 4
Total 21949 4703 4178 1081 1161 2088 8738 8780 6929 4608 1498 103
Very low low Medium Medium High High Very
high Acidic General Acidic
Above acidic General Critical Injurious
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141 Mandangad 6 34 121 271 342 1681 1521 934 0 2446 8 12 Dapoli 9 101 224 440 441 2146 1985 1376 0 3336 25 03 Khed 8 44 126 268 248 1255 1171 778 0 1931 18 04 Guhagar 0 9 56 131 180 911 898 389 0 1274 12 15 Chiplun 9 77 176 324 346 1824 1761 994 1 2739 16 1
6 Sangmeshwar 8 33 138 276 298 1484 1395 842 0 2232 5 0
7 Ratnagiri 52 195 328 535 515 2317 2737 1205 0 3852 89 18 Lanja 11 44 113 209 239 1086 1263 439 0 1702 0 09 Rajapur 6 42 94 251 323 1544 1726 534 0 2250 10
Total 579 1376 2705 2932 14248 14457 7491 1 21762 183 4
PH Coductivity (E.C )Sr. No. Taluka
Available Potash
Soil Fertility Index District Ratnagiri
Sr. No. Taluka
No of Soil
Samples
Organic carbon Available Phospphorus
13
2.2.5. Irrigation and Ground water
Irrigation facilities : There is only one medium irrigation project existing in the district, which is situated at
Natuwadi in Khed tahsil. All other remaining 17 irrigation projects are of minor type. There are three
each minor irrigation projects in Lanja and Sangameshwar tahsil, two each in Rajapur, Guhagar and
Dapoli tahsil and five minor irrigation projects in Chiplun tahsil. Irrigation through wells is
predominant in the district. Irrigation is predominantly through wells. There are 834 wells in Khed tahsil, 602 in Dapoli, 478 in
Ratnagiri, 222 in Rajapur, about 150 each in Chiplun and Guhagar tahsils and less than 100 wells in
other tahsils of the district.
The Minor Irrigation functions in Ratnagiri District under the following Offices:
1. Kokan Irrigation Circle, Ratnagiri.
a. Ratnagiri Irrigation Division (South), Ratnagiri. (Schemes above 250 hectares)
b. Irrigation Construction Division, Ratnagiri.
2. Minor Irrigation (Local Section) Division, Ratnagiri (Schemes above 100 to 250 hectares)
3. Minor Irrigation, Kapsal, Chiplun. (Schemes above 250 hectares)
4. Minor Irrigation, Kudal, Oros. (Schemes above 250 hectares)
5. Rural Water Supply Division, Zilla Parishad, Ratnagiri. (Schemes from 0 to 100 hectares)
Micro irrigation To make efficient use of irrigation water and to increase productivity per unit area to bring
more area under irrigation, sprinklers and drip irrigation systems are found to be very effective.
Micro irrigation scheme of Government of India is being implemented in the Maharashtra State.
Under this scheme financial assistance is given to beneficiaries. Progress of micro-irrigation in the
district is shown below-
Table 2.30 Progress of micro irrigation in the district is as follows
Sr. No. Year System No. of Sets Area (ha) Expenditure
1 2000-01 Drip 573 720.16 130.60 Sprinkler 1,205 1200.25 142.57
2 2001-02 Drip 518 598.02 49.89 Sprinkler 328 328.00 24.87
3 2002-03 Drip 427 511.06 59.05 Sprinkler 435 435.00 49.41
4 2003-04 Drip 219 257.41 13.55 Sprinkler 469 468.45 30.61
5 2004-05 Drip 124 179.67 9.72 Sprinkler 526 511.08 31.92
6 2005-06 Drip 143 198.87 26.29 Sprinkler 497 521.33 28.20
7 2006-07 Drip 384 271.00 40.99 Sprinkler 853 491.43 35.06
8 2007-08 Drip 655 384.00 98.91 Sprinkler 1402 853.00 100.04
Total Drip 3433 3120.84 433.00 Sprinkler 5353.00 4808.84 442.68
14
Ground Water
Ratnagiri District has been divided into 20 watershed areas with the aim of
providing precise technical data and information to the various funding agencies and
organizations implementing minor irrigation projects in the district. Every Water shed
area is 25 to 30 square kilometres in area. Based on accepted principles and practices
Ground water recharge, withdrawal and remaing ground water has been estimated
independently for every watershed area. While the latest survey was done in 2008. As
such figures of 2008 have been considered for the purpose of planning potential. As per
the 2008 estimates the annual groundwater recharge in 20 watershed areas was 48,909.08
hectare metres, of which 5249.47 hectare metres is withdrawn and 38771.77 hectare
metres remains as balance groundwater. The entire region of Ratnagiri district falls in the
Western Region Watershed area.
Table 33 Groundwater Classification of Ratnagiri District
Figure No 2.11 Component Wise Groundwater Recharge Ratnagiri District
From the data given below it is clear that after providing for domestic and
industrial consumption until the year 2025 there is ample scope to utilize ground
water since 13938.15 hectare metres of net ground water recharge is available
for future irrigation. While there are limitation to area expansion the
opportunities offered by net groundwater for future irrigation is significant and
offers hope for Rabi and Summer Cultivation thereby raising cropping Intensity
vital for achievement for the projections as envisaged by the said plan.
Component wise Groundwater Recharge Ratnagiri District (In Hectare Metres)
20106.3, 93%
132.7, 1%
42.8, 0%
994.5, 5%
91.4, 0% 125.9, 1%
Rainfall
Canal
Surface Irrigation
Ground Water Irrigation- Tanks
Conservation Structures
15
Table 2.31 Groundwater Classification of Ratnagiri District
PRE MONSOON
POST MONSOON
REQUIR-EMENT
ALLOCATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 161 WF 54 19686 NC 12994 412.88 20.64 392.24 128.5 32.75 RISING RISING SAFE 40 40 233.772 WF 55 26906 NC 16178 527.89 26.39 501.5 138.2 7.55 RISING RISING SAFE 92.41 92.41 270.933 WF 56 37896 C 404 38.11 1.91 36.21 1.84 WF 56 37896 NC 15824 503.3 25.17 478.14 433.25 WF 57 31475 C 364 34.75 1.74 33.01 0.8 6 WF 57 31475 NC 19889 550.49 27.52 522.97 158.87 WF 58 47309 NC 2050 85.48 4.27 81.21 7.58 WF 58 47309 NC 34073 920.53 46.03 874.51 129.89 WF 59 39501 NC 20370 973.44 48.67 924.77 638.2 69.01 RISING RISING SAFE 89.41 89.41 197.210 WF 60 35430 C 25689 978.3 48.91 929.38 651.2 70.06 RISING RISING SAFE 107.6 107.6 170.6111 WF 61 70176 C 824 111.27 5.56 105.71 48.9312 WF 61 70176 NC 48427 1992.67 99.63 1893.04 135.213 WF 62 50842 NC 34288 973.15 48.66 924.5 231.7 25.06 RISING RISING SAFE 145.8 145.8 546.9814 WF 63 21914 NC 14429 1886.87 94.34 1792.52 428.8 23.92 RISING RISING SAFE 41 41 1322.6915 WF 64 32307 C 404 119.1 5.96 113.15 18.8816 WF 64 32307 NC 22570 3698.03 184.9 3513.12 84.5217 WF 65 23834 NC 13094 1992.61 99.63 1892.98 225.5 11.91 RISING RISING SAFE 52.01 52.01 1615.4618 WF 66 25370 NC 15249 2394.83 119.74 2275.08 607 26.68 RISING RISING SAFE 155 155 1513.1119 WF 67 44570 C 227 28.92 1.45 27.47 15.1920 WF 67 44570 NC 18912 563.24 28.16 535.08 112.321 WF 68 57096 C 220 86.05 8.6 77.44 1.122 WF 68 57096 NC 29707 1156.88 57.84 1099.04 297.323 WF 69 51251 C 184 54.72 2.74 51.98 81.9424 WF 69 51251 NC 36974 1341.3 67.06 1274.23 164.225 WF 69 2330 NC 699 30.24 1.51 28.73 0.2 0.7 RISING RISING SAFE 0.4 0.4 28.13
384048 21461.05 1084 20386 4750 1765 1740 13938.15
NET GW AVAIL FOR
FUTURE IRRIGATION USE (Ham)
0
$ 930.31
28.7 RISING RISING SAFE
105.6 79.3384.58
SR NOWATER SHED
NO
TOTAL WS
AREA (Hectares
)
TYPE OF
AREA
AREA SUITABLE FOR GW
RECHARGE(Hectares)
TOTAL ANNUAL
GW RECHARGE
(Ham)
GROSS DRAFT (Ham)
STAGE OF
DEVEL (%)
RISING RISING SAFE
NATURAL
DISCHARGE
(Ham)
NET ANNUAL
GW AVAILABILITY (Ham)
WATER TABLE TREND FOR YEAR 2025 DOME + INDUS
CATEGORY OF
WATERSHED
129.8 129.8 266.58
14.37 RISING RISING SAFE 130.6 130.6 687.77
RISING SAFE 181.8 181.8 1632.76
2.85 RISING RISING SAFE 80.41 80.41 3442.47
9.21 RISING
RISING SAFE 93.01 93.01 342.08
25.36 RISING RISING SAFE 156.8 156.8 721.3
22.66 RISING
TOTAL
149.2 149.218.56 RISING RISING SAFE
Source- Annual Ground water Survey Report – 2007-08
16
Table 2.32 Component Wise Recharge of Ground Water in Ratnagiri District
Rainfall CanalSurface Irriga-tion
Ground Water
IrrigatnTanks
Conse-rvation
StructurTotal
1 1471 WF 54 Mandanagad Non Command Hardrock 12994.0 86 385.77 0.00 0.00 27.12 0.00 14.00 412.88
2 1472 WF 55 Mandanagad, Dapoli
Non Command Hardrock 16178.0 81 480.29 0.00 0.00 22.99 0.00 24.61 527.89
3 1473 WF 56 Dapoli Command Hardrock 404.0 0 10.41 10.86 10.86 0.00 16.35 0.00 38.11
4 1473 WF 56 Dapoli Non Command Hardrock 15824.0 406 407.75 0.00 0.00 95.55 0.00 0.00 503.30
5 1474 WF 57 Dapoli, khed Command Hardrock 364.0 0 11.54 12.59 12.59 0.00 0.00 10.00 34.75
6 1474 WF 57 Dapoli, khed Non Command Hardrock 19889.0 75 526.82 0.00 0.00 23.67 0.00 0.00 550.49
7 1475 WF 58 khed Command Hardrock 2050.0 0 54.30 10.59 10.59 0.00 0.00 12.12 85.48
8 1475 WF 58 khed Non Command Hardrock 34073.0 57 902.53 0.00 0.00 18.01 0.00 0.00 920.53
9 1476 WF 59 Dapoli Non Command Hardrock 20370.0 471 809.34 0.00 0.00 148.37 0.00 15.74 973.44
10 1477 WF 60 Guhagar, Chiplun
Non Command Hardrock 25689.0 475 828.96 0.00 0.00 149.34 0.00 0.00 978.30
11 1478 WF 61 Khed, Chiplun Command Hardrock 824.0 24 33.65 52.26 5.59 14.77 0.00 5.00 111.27
12 1478 WF 61 Khed, Chiplun Non Command Hardrock 48427.0 53 1977.56 0.00 0.00 15.11 0.00 0.00 1992.67
13 1479 WF 62 Khed, Chiplun, Sangmeshwar
Non Command Hardrock 34288.0 136 933.46 0.00 0.00 39.70 0.00 0.00 973.15
14 1480 WF 63 Guhagar Non Command Hardrock 14429.0 349 1766.11 0.00 0.00 102.08 6.22 12.46 1886.87
15 1481 WF 64 Chiplun, Sangmeshwar Command Hardrock 404.0 13 65.99 11.77 1.39 8.00 0.00 31.95 119.10
16 1481 WF 64 Chiplun, Sangameshwar
Non Command Hardrock 22570.0 40 3686.67 0.00 0.00 11.35 0.00 0.00 3698.03
17 1482 WF 65 Ratnagiri, Sangmeshwar
Non Command Hardrock 13094.0 157 1942.73 0.00 0.00 49.88 0.00 0.00 1992.61
18 1483 WF 66 Ratnagiri Non Command Hardrock 15249.0 421 2262.46 0.00 0.00 132.36 0.00 0.00 2394.83
19 1484 WF 67 Sangmeshwar Command Hardrock 227.0 7 9.00 14.75 0.82 4.36 0.00 0.00 28.92
20 1484 WF 67 Sangmeshwar Non Command Hardrock 18912.0 57 545.42 0.00 0.00 17.82 0.00 0.00 563.24
21 1485 WF 68 Ratnagiri, Lanja Sangmeshwar, Command Hardrock 220.0 0 6.80 9.98 0.46 0.00 68.81 0.00 86.05
22 1485 WF 68 Ratnagiri, Lanja Sangmeshwar,
Non Command Hardrock 29707.0 179 1101.89 0.00 0.00 54.99 0.00 0.00 1156.88
23 1486 WF 69 Ratnagiri, Sangmeshwar Command Hardrock 184.0 55 7.96 9.93 0.50 36.33 0.00 0.00 54.72
24 1486 WF 69 Ratnagiri, Sangmeshwar
Non Command Hardrock 36974.0 71 1318.61 0.00 0.00 22.68 0.00 0.00 1341.30
25 1487 WF 69 Sangmeshwar Non Command Hardrock 699.0 0 30.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.24
384043.0 3213.0 20106.3 132.7 42.8 994.5 91.4 125.9 21455.1
Terrain Area in Hectare
Existing Irriga-tion
wells
TOTAL
Sr.no
Index no
Water shed no.
Talukas included
Recharge in Hectare metre Form
Type of Area
Source- Annual Ground water Survey Report – 2007-08
17
2.3 Vision Document
A joint process of comprehensive development of the Agriculture Sector in Ratnagiri has been put
forth by the the National Development Council Resolution of the 29th May 2007. Initiated under
chairmanship of the Honorable District Collector the Process identifies the key thrust areas for the
rejuvenation of the sector in the State to achieve the objectives set forth by the council.
Aims based on which the vision that has been set forth while reaffirming the commitment of
the District to achieve 4.4 percent annual growth in agriculture sector during the XI Five Years Plan
period, is laid down hereinbelow:
1. Additional production of 152114 metric tonnes of cereals 3190 metric tonnes of
pulses; and _____ lakh metric tonnes of oilseeds in the District under the National
Food Security Mission would have been achieved.
2. Additional Prodution of Horticulture Produce in terms of fruits, vegetables and spices.
And to harnest the potential of the produce in the district for quality production
(GAP/Organic Certified) for export to the Domestic/Internaltional market and facilities
such as cold chain facility and post harvest infrastructure would have been created
and the potential of the existing infrastructure would have been maximised with
assistance from the National Horticulture Mission and other applicable sources.
3. Agriculture in Ratnagiri district primarily being rain-fed, watershed development will
be the major strategy for increasing the agriculture production and productivity. This
will include watershed treatment and various measures for protective irrigation and
water recharging including farm ponds; repair of bodies.
4. Another important means of for increasing the agriculture production and productivity
is to create Infrastructure for Better Water Availability. Completion of construction of
Medium and Minor Irrigation Dams and institution of delivery mechanisms would
have brought an additional 4,000 hectares of land under irrigation.
5. An additional 7,000 hectares of land would have been brought under micro irrigation
to improve water use efficiency to increase production and productivity.
6. Processing of agriculture and horticulture produce such as rice mills, processing of
pulses fruit processing, would have value added the same and provided agriculture
allied additional income and employment to large sections of rural population
especially women.
7. Efforts would have been taken to utilize resources available from all existing schemes
such as Backward Region Grant Funds, National Rural Employment Guarantee
Programme, and livestock and fishing would have been integrated with minor
irrigation projects, rural development works and with the other schemes for water
harvesting and conservation. Efforts if possible would also be made to include
schemes for beneficiaries of land reforms.
8. Steps to initiate infrastructure strategically to improve marketing infrastructure at
Taluka level would have been completed or would be substancially under progress.
9. Strengthening would have taken place of agriculture extension in the State by
expediting implementation of the ATMA programme with focus on demonstration,
training and involvement of farmers groups; strengthening technical expertise at
18
district and taluka levels; improvement would have taken place in research-extension-
farmer linkages through the State Agriculture Universities and the KVSs; promotion
public-partnership in extension.
10. Priority would have been given to seed production and make would have been made
to bridge the gap between seed requirement and seed production / availability in the
District. Further, particular focus will be on paddy, nagli and pulse such as toor,
pawta, kulith, khesari, cowpea, moth peas and gram and oilseeds like groundnut and
sunflower through programs such as Gram Beejotpadan and participation of the
private sector for whom benefits would have been availed under Central Sector
Scheme of "Assistance for boosting of seed production in private sector "with the
assistance from National seeds Corporation.
11. Testing of soil samples would have been conducted in 1525 villages.
12. Would have been initiated under the State organic Farming policy to promote use of
bio-fertilizers, organic manures and micro-nutrient to enhance soil health; to provide
a further, boost to creation of organic sites in all talukas of the State in association
with NGOs/ co-operatives and others and bring 1,000 hectares under Organic
Certification.
2.4 Development Vision and Strategy Preamble
The Comprehensive Development of Agricultural Plan (CDAP) is to achieve an overall growth
rate of 4.5 per cent in the agriculture sector during XI Plan period. To achieve this objective the
CDAP has followed an integrated and holistic approach by involving all the concerned stakeholders
like farmers, institutions like panchayat raj institutions, non-governmental and voluntary agencies,
Agricultural Scientists, academicians and all the concerned line departments at the district and
below. This participatory approach aims to fulfill the stated objectives of CDAP.
Reasons for Backwardness
The important reasons for backwardness of agriculture are:
Degradation of soil fertility.
Poor soil and water management
Inadequate agro processing units, post harvest and export facilties.
Inadequate green fodder, local breeds and veterinary aids.
Migration of labour to towns and cities.
Vision Statement
The CDAP is prepared keeping in view the objectives and goals of the NADP/RKVY of
Government of India and Planning Commission.. The CDAP is not only to achieve the 4.5 per cent
growth rate in XI plan period but also to mitigate the poverty, unemployment, vulnerability and
more importantly sustainable agriculture productivity.
19
Portrayal of the Vision
In order to stabilize the farmer’s income it is necessary to promote the allied agriculture
activities, make provisions to provide assistance to varied sericulture activities. Poultry production in
the district are planned to be pushed up through promotion of artificial insemination, establishment
of diagnostic laboratories. Importance has been given for high-tech horticulture expansion of area
under wine verities, promotion of organic farming and recharging of bore wells are among the
components that are expected to improve horticultural productivity. Most important issue is
strengthening the irrigation network and enhancing the potentiality of irrigation by establishment of
express lines for lift irrigation schemes.
To achieve the agricultural growth rate of 4.5% in the district the year-wise targeted
production for the 12th plan are: 2012-13 –3.27 lakhs tones; 2013-14 – 3.38 lakh tones; 2014-15 –
3.62 lakh tones; 2015-16 – 3.72 lakh tonnec and 2016-17 – 3.83 lakh tonnes.
Reservoir fisheries development will be taken up to achieve fish production; all the tanks and
ponds in the district will be brought under fish culture to maximise fish production; Sea fishing too
shall be regulated and deep sea fishing shall be encouraged, so also mericulture. Fish production
will be raised from the present 105069 metric tonnes to 180508 metric tonnes; ornamental fish
breeding and its marketing shall also be focused upon.
Medium Term Perspective
Keeping in view of the concerns expressed by the Government of India, with regard to low
productivity and low income in the agriculture and allied sectors, a medium term of five year plan
starting from 2012-13 to 2016-17, as part of XII Five Year Plan, is being proposed and prepared for
Ratnagiri district. To achieve the plan targets, an investment to the tune of Rs.______ lakh has been
proposed.
20
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total Total (8+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Integrated cereal development program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.13 67.13 112.26 112.26
2 Integrated oilseed development program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.02 13.52 24.54 24.54
3 Soil Helth card program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.47 7.47 14.94 14.94
4 Support for agric. extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00
5 . Strengthening of Agro-Polyclinics 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
6 Strengthening Taluka Seed Farm 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
7 Agriculture Mechanisation 0.00 0.00 39 100.00 150.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289.00
8 Organic Farming Promotion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.37 11.37 22.74 22.74
9 NFSM pulses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.42 3.51 14.34 30.00 30.00 80.27 80.27
10 Maintaining Agriculture Statistics 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
11 crop sap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 172.50 195.00 152.00 160.00 160.00 839.50 839.50
12 Rainfed Agricultrue development programme 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 Dryland farming mission 0.00 0.00 266.14 338.77 710.67 1315.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1315.58
14 Rainfed Agricultrue development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15 Partcipaton of women in agriculture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.90 0.90
0.00 0.00 305.14 442.77 864.67 1612.58 174.92 198.51 166.34 268.44 292.94 1101.15 2713.73
1 Strengthening of Govt Nursery 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
2 Planting material development in nurseries 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 120.00 120.00
3 Micor irrigation 20.28 32.50 17.98 20.00 60.00 150.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.76
4 NHM 219.92 208.43 319.65 199.38 445.32 1392.70 101.50 66.50 25.39 18.93 30.00 242.32 1635.02
5 EGS Horticulture 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 175.00 325.00 325.00
6 Coconut Devlopment Board Aided Scheme 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 50.00
240.20 240.93 337.63 269.38 555.32 1643.46 121.50 86.50 45.39 213.93 270.00 737.32 2380.78
1 IWMP 1888.63 2209.41 1178.69 1944.78 74.78 7296.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7296.29
2 NWDPRA 147.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.83
3 Jalyut shivar Abhiyan 0.00 0.00 623.26 4179.25 6000.00 10802.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10802.51
2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 6124.03 6074.78 18246.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18246.63
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Ongoing sheme (Infrastructure and production)
Infrastructure and assests stream Production and growth
Total
Total
Total
Agriculture
Horticulture
Soil Conservation
21
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total Total (8+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Establishment of gokul grams under Rashtriya Gokul Mission 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00
2 Establishment of mobile extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00
3 Supply of mini setter and Hatchers of 5000 eggs capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 53.00 106.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106.00
4 Mobile Marketing 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
5 Faciliating Market 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
6 Introduction of power driven chaff cutter 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00
7 Supply of Veternary mobile Units cum Diagnostic Laboraties 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00
8 modernaxation of veterinary Dispensaries, Gr.1 for online data entry 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.45 0.00 16.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.45
0.00 0.00 0.00 923.45 833.00 1756.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1756.45
1 Establishment Of fish seed Farm 19.62 2.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 37.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.12
2 Grant of subsidy on fishery Requisite - non mechanized boats 13.99 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 83.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.99
3 Nylon Twine 0.77 0.85 0.99 1.15 1.15 4.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.91
4 Mechnization of Fishing Crafts (80% Central Assistance) 696.32 1071.90 652.01 800.00 800.00 4020.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4020.23
5 Dev. Of infrastructure facilities on fish landing 50.59 98.59 123.83 100.00 100.00 473.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 473.01
6 Development of Fishing Harbours 0 0.00 1466.10 1500.00 1500.00 4466.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4466.10
781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9085.36
1 Mangroov Plantation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
2 Casurina Plantation by group formation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
3057.95 3634.18 4712.65 10185.78 10753.92 32344.48 296.42 285.01 211.73 482.37 592.94 1868.47 34212.95
Infrastructure and assests stream Production and growth
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Ongoing sheme (Infrastructure and production)
Animal Husbandary
Grand Total
Total
Fishery
Social Forestry
Total
Total
22
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Agro-polyclinic mobile van 1 Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.000 50.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.000 50.00
1 Subsidy on mini tempo for transport of vegetables 25 tempo x 2 labor @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 45.000 90.00
2 Mango cashew Board 0.00 0.00 200.00 250.00 300.000 750.00
0.00 0.00 200.00 295.00 345.00 840.00
1 Construction of Farm ponds in rice field for protective irrigation. 4000 ponds x Rs 52264 size- 20 x 20 x 3 m
0.00 0.00 0.00 1045.28 1045.280 2090.56
2 lining of farms ponds (20 x 20 x 3 m)3000 ponds 0.00 0.00 0.00 750.00 1000.000 1750.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1795.28 2045.28 3840.56
1 Establishment of Gokul grams under Rashtriya Gokul Mission 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 1000.00
2 Establishment of Mobile extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00
3 Supply of mini setter and Hatchers of 5000 eggs capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 53.00 106.00
4 Mobile Marketing 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00
5 Faciliating Market 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00
6 Introduction of power driven chaff cutter 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
7 Supply of Veternary Mobile Units cum Diagnostic Laboraties 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00
8 Modernazation of veterinary Dispensaries, Gr.1 for online data entry 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.35 0.00 26.35
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 933.35 833.00 1766.35
0.00 0.00 200.00 3073.63 3223.28 6496.91
Soil Conservation
Total
Animal Husbandary
Grand Total
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Infrastructure and assests stream
Agriculture
Total
Horticulture
Total
23
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Incentives for hybrid seed growers for seed production Subsidy 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.28 16.28 32.56
2 Supply of Urea DAP bricket on 50% subsidy 10% area per year 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.10 56.10 112.20
3 Supply of improved seed Wal, Gram & Cowpea @50 % subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 35.00 35.00 70.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 107.38 107.38 214.76
1 Coconut supply of pheromone traps for control of Red Palm Weevil . @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 2.50 2.50 5.00
2 Supply of pheromone traps for control of Rhinoceros beetle @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 2.50 2.50 5.00
3 Drum stick PKM 1&2 (hybrid) 5/ plants 40000 plants x Rs 10 @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 11.25 11.25 22.50
4 Contract farming for vegetables 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 16.25 16.25 32.50
1 A.I. Delivery System under RKVY 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00
2 clean milk production 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.25 31.25 62.50
3 Assistance to farmers for promotion of intergrated live stalk farming on 25% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 625.00 1250.00
4 Distrubution of fodder seed 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
5 Establishment of silage making unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
6 Fodder production form fallow lands 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
7 Establishment of Hydroponics fodder production unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
8 Establishment of Azolla production unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
9 Stall fed 40+2 goat unit by punyashlok Ahiyadevi Maharashtra Mendi va Sheli vikas mahamandal 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 925.75 811.25 1737.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1049.38 934.88 1984.26
Agriculture
Total
Horticulture
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Production and growth
Animal Husbandary
Total
Grand Total
Total
24
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Infrastructure 8 197.66 251.91 641.73 1835.09 0.00 4627.89
Production 10 235.77 303.28 656.87 825.99 825.99 2847.90
18 433.43 555.19 1298.60 2661.08 825.99 7475.79
Infrastructure 4 186.59 166.61 193.68 545.40 595.32 1687.60
Production 5 311.23 41.16 183.70 335.93 335.93 1207.95
9 497.82 207.77 377.38 881.33 931.25 2895.55
Infrastructure 5 2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 7919.31 8120.06 22087.19
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 7919.31 8120.06 22087.19
Infrastructure 10 0.00 48.37 17.43 949.10 833.00 1847.90
Production 12 135.66 63.03 47.36 927.55 813.05 1986.65
22 135.66 111.40 64.79 1876.65 1646.05 3834.55
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure 6 781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36
Infrastructure 5 5.55 110.60 1973.85 568.40 164.85 2823.25
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 5.55 110.60 1973.85 568.40 164.85 2823.25
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00
Infrastructure 38 0.00 0.00 0.00 14243.45 12139.38 42159.19
Production 29 682.66 407.47 887.93 2089.47 2004.97 6072.50
67 682.66 407.47 887.93 16332.92 14144.35 48231.69
Abstract Infrastructure and assests stream and Production and growth for proposed and ongoing sheme
Sr. No.
Name of Department Stream Number
of shemes
Yearwise Program Total
1Agriculture
Sub Total
2Horticulture
Sub Total
3Soil
Conservation
Sub Total
4Animal
husbandary
Sub Total
5 Dairy
Sub Total
6Fishery
Sub Total
7Coopertaive
and Marketing
Sub Total
8Sericulture
Sub Total
9Social forestry
Sub Total
Grand Total
25
CHAPTER III:
SWOT ANALYSIS OF RATNAGIRI DISTRICT
Strengths Weakness Opportunities Threats Rainfall Assured Rainfall Heavy Rainfall in Short
Duration Scope to Use Ground Water and water storage.
Excess and Erratic Rainfall. Decrease in number of rainy days indicating growing intensity of rainfall. Leaching of Nutrients due to heavy rains.
Climate and Environment Moderate Climates and Unpolluted environment
Increasing Fluctuation in Climate affecting growth driver sectors such as Horticulture and Fisheries. District Ill Equipped to apprehend, face and address changing climatic fluctutions.
Scope for research and technology devevelopment to address weakness and in cases possible to capitalize on the situation.
Global Warming and Climatic Change. Adverse affect on health, productivity and production.
Climate suitable for horticulture crops, agro forestry, medicinal plants.
Pest and Disease Incidence High Due to Hot and Humid Climate. Also Low scope for Crop Diversification
Economic Activity employment generation and wealth creation.
Large number of proposed power plants may affect air & water quality presumed essential for development of agriculture & allied sectors
Transport and Road Connectivity of Villages Proximity to National Highway and Konkan Railway
Due to low marketable surplus of agriculture & allied commodities, low industrial output linkages to other parts of the state are lacking.
agriculture & allied commodities have assured markets in the other parts of district & state if production & activity is increased.
Non expansion of market may lead to concentration of markets and glut situations for perishable horticultural products.
Almost all villages connected by roads
Low Usage for industrial and village generated economic activity.
Scope to use road connectivity to up activity in agriculture and allied sectors including production and increase processing activity.
Increase in weakness and inability to take the opportunity shall cause outflow of basic natural resources, change in land ownership.
Non-Usage of Konkan Railway for Marketing of Agriculture and Allied Produce
Expansion or opening of Within/Outside State Market through Konkan Railway.
26
Electrification 99 percent of the villages electrified.
Lack of use for agricultural and small/cottage industrial purposes.
Scope for use of available electricity sources to introduce/ improvise mechanization and basic farm infrastructure requiring electricity.
Continuance of weakness shall lead to backwardness.
Load shedding affecting seasonal food processing dependant on electrification. Also affects irrigation.
Exploitation of Tidal and Solar Energy.
Insiffiecient Supply leading to power cuts may damage high value crops in cold storages and leads to use of high value fuels for electricity.
Non-availability of agricultural connections in remote areas of electrified villages.
Increase in forest fires because of short circuits.
Literacy High Literacy Rate Literacy is bereft of
knowledge of agriculture and allied sector. Non-Availability of higher education facilities.
Practical short courses aimed at livelihood improvement and entreprenueral skill development in agiculture and allied sector.
Literacy minus knowledge and skill of agriculture sector shall lead to masses weaning away from agriculture and allied sector.
Migration of High level literates.
Human Resource and Labour Availability Labour is remunerative.
Non-Utilization of family labour.
Scope for activity and wealth creation from increased agriculture and allied activity on community basis. Good Scope for community based activity.
Non Capitalization of family labour will lead to intra regional imbalance and lack of cooperation.
Growth Drivers sectors labourer starved as additional labour required. Dearth of skilled personnel.
Courses for imparting labour skills and encouraging youth to take up labour as career option. Good Career Options for semi literate youth as farm managers in horticulture plantations and round the year work guaranteed in their own villages or near vicinity.
Enhancement of trend of shortage shall lead to depence on imported migrant labour and outflow of capital to outside regions and increase in cost and cause change in village demographics.
27
Good Opportunities for Labour.
Labour is still looked down upon. Does not have respect inspite of shortage and being remunerative.
Scope for SHGs to take up community based activity in Agriculture and Allied Sector.
If dignity to labour is not given available local force shall be displaced by foreign migrant labour, as in Alphonso Mango sector in Ratnagiri, Lanja and Rajapur Talukas.
Other Varied Agro Ecological Zones
Absentee Landholders, and non-clear titles.
Scope for domestic tourism and agro tourism activity.
Forest Fire Hazards
Large Coastline Loss Human of Resources due to traditional migration.
Scope for NGOs, FIGs and SHGs to work in Agriculture and Allied Sectors.
Increasing Shortage of Farm Labour
Good Tourisn Development in Coastal Talukas of Ratnagiri Guhagar, Dapoli
Lack of Irrigation Facilities. Difficulties in Storage due to percolating soil.
Scope for Tourism Development in Rajapur, mandangad and inland talukas
Degradation of Land and Forestry from Deforestation on Private Lands.
Good Participation of women in agriculture
Small .and Scatterred Land holdings. Unclear Land Titles. Lack of cohesion amongst joint land holders.
Wild Animals (Monkeys, Wild Boars) and Stray Cattle causing loss to Agricultural Crops.
Good presence of cottage industry.
Uneven Topography and eneven lands. Mountainous terrain. Large Tracks of Uncultivable Land.
Non exploitation shall lead to transfer of land and property to rich classes and diversion of land for industrial activity.
Weak presence of NGO and Cooperative Sector.
Agriculture Assured rainfall Heavy Rainfall in Short
Duration causing Soil Erosion due to heavy rains and decreasing water retention capacity of soil
Water Storage and exploitation of ground water to increase cropping intensity.
Failure to conserve soil and water shall lead to backwardness in agriculture.
Crop/Bio- Diversity No Good Cultivable Land Under Class – I. 68% lands under lands for occassional cultivation and steep slopes with shallow soil prone to soil erosion.
Scope for SHG and community farming to address labour shortage and sharing of infrastructure
Strong Participation of Women in Agriculture and allied activities.
Low Cropping Intensity. Monocropping and seasonal cultivation.
Scope to improve productivity and production by using modern technology, organic practices.
Good Road Connectivity and Electrification of villages
Absentee Landlords. Sub-Division anf fragmentation of land.
Assured Market at Main Village Markets, Taluka Markets and within district.
Accessibility to agricultural
Short Duration of rainfall affects
Scope for Agro Tourism
28
university and Krishi Vigyan Kendras.
cultivating vegetables, pulses and oilseeds productivity.
Strong Womens Participation in Agriculture
Labour Shortage as Large population of Men have migrated in the last two centuries.
Continuance of weakness shall threaten food security
Market Availability NGO presence in Agriculture Sector Weak
Rice Productivity High.
Low Scope for mechanization due to small land holding.
Could lead to sale of land to large and powerfull sections of societies.
Abundance of natural resources
Lack of Cooperation at Community Level to pool into, construct and share infrastructure
Opportunity to incorporate Agriculture in school curriculum. A long standing demand of farming community.
Small and Medium Farmers shall be converted to agriculture labour class if weakness is not cured.
Effective Extension Public Services.
Weak and ineffective APMC
Stregthening of APMC shall lead to marketing of surplus in district rather then export to other APMCs.
Migration of youth may recommence.
Heavy Soil Erosion Increase in standard of living and increased spending on agriculture and allied produce in the district.
Decreasing Productivity and increasing incidence of pest and disease, increased risk of crop failure
Low Water Holding Capacity of Soil
Demand for Organic Produces.
Increasing I n crop failure. May encourage farmers to keep lands fallow further decreasing cropping intensity.
Absentee Landholders Sale of land. Lack of Irrigation
Facilities. Difficulties in Storage due to percolating soil.
.
Small .and Scattered Land holdings. Unclear Land Titles. Lack of cohesion amongst joint land holders.
Uneven Topography and eneven lands. Mountainous terrain. Large Tracks of Uncultivable Land.
Lack of Entreprenuership at Individual and community level in agriculture sector.
Lack of Knowledge of agriculture schemes.
29
Lack of Agri-Processing and Value Addition.
Shortage of Farm Labour
Lack of facilities for tourist
Horticulture Growth Driver Sector
Gaps in Research, Extension and Adoption of Modern Technology by Farmers.
Scope to give further impetus to sector by bridging GAPs and strengthening Backward and Forward Linkages (Post Harvest Management, Value Addition,
Failure to address weakness shall increase intensity of problems and lead to dilution of natural advantages.
Vast areas for plantation
Monoculture Plantations leading to high incidence of pest and disease
Intercropping Monoculture is a threat to farm health. Favours pest and disease.
Exportable Cash Crops like Alphonso Mango Cashew.
High cost of cultivation. High Value Horticulture Crops.
Strong Government support for horticulture.
Lack of Post Harvest facilities.
Scope for cooperative farming.
Large number of processing units.
Lack of Cooperation and Co-operative Sector.
Scope for Productivity Increase.
Lack of Irrigation Facilities, Roads to Plantations, Electricity.
Scope for International Export.
LARGE SCALE Leasing of Unmanaged Alphonso Mango Plantations to Traders.
Organic Cultivation
High rate of non-functional Cashew Processing Units due to lack of seed capital.
Rainfall and Climatic Conditions Assured Rainfall, Soil and Climatic Conditions suitable for Horticulture. Unpolluted Environment
Soil Erosion leading to crop vulnerability to pest and disease and susceptible to climatic Change. Humid weather favorable to pest and fungal growth. Lack of Water and Soil Conservation measures.
Scope to improve productivity and soil health by taking measures to conserve water and soil.
Leaching of Micro nutrients due to heavy rainfall leading to Low Productivity leading to incidence of pest and disease, high cost of production and low realization.
Large Availability of Ground water storage. Farmers Initiative to tap ground water & water storage in Farm Ponds.
Lack of Irrigation during Flowering and fruit setting stage
Scope for Better Crop management using irrigation since soil has low water retention capacity.
Absence of water may hinder scope for increasing productivity and production.
30
Area Expansion Availability of large tracks of land for plantation
Absentee landlords, unclear Land Titles and lack of cohesiveness and vision amongst joint land title holders.
Scope for Area Expansion in Class IV and Class VI Lands. Scope for Banana, Pineapple, Sapota for local market in district.
Non development may lead to diversion to non agricultural purposes.
Natural Advantage Natural Advantage of Good Quality Produce strong in Taste and Aroma
Low Productivity. Lack of Management resulting in crop loss.
Scope for augmenting qualitative & Quantitative Production by adoption of Scientific management practices.
Lack of Management may degrade quality of produce and increase cost of controlling pest and disease or may cause crop loss. Other non traditional areas have begun to compete and adulterate low quality fruit.
Processing Large number of farm based Fruit Processing and Value Addition by farmers.
Seasonal Processing Only
Scope for increasing fruit range and viability of processing units.
Stand alone Processing Units of Non-Farmers risk non-viability if number of operational days are not increased.
Availability of Family Labour
Shortage of Non-Family Additional Labour required by Medium and Large Plantations.
Scope for Land less and Marginal land Holding Youth, SHGs to take up labour oriented services.
Dependence on Migrant Labour and flight of capital and wastage of available human resource.
Organization Large Number of SHGs
Lack of Cooperation Scope for FIGs to work on Backward and Forward Linkages to share infrastructure and thereby reduce cost and increase efficiency and utilization.
Non- Organization shall lead to continued disadvantage to individuals and continued setback.
Marketing & Forward Linkages Assured and Vast Unexploited Market.
Lack of transport facilities and individualistic nature of farmers hinder marketing.
Scope for cooperation in developing Marketting linkages.
Unexploited Markets is wastage of opportunity and chance to other to take it.
Number of Farmers adopting GLOBALGAP standards for Farm management for Alphonso.
Weak Development of Forward Linkages.
FIGs to become exporters.
Lack of Large Base and limited managerial ability of FIGs hinders forward linkages. Global Meltdown.
Floriculture Loose Flowers Assured Demand Low Production and
area Assured Local market
Dependance on Imports
31
Green House Large Number Upcoming Small Units
Marketing and Lack of Cooperation
Scope for Cooperation in Backward and Forward Linkages
Lack of cooperation and organization leading to closure
Medicinal Plants Large Pool of Biodiversity and natural presence of Large number of Medicinal Plants
Lack of Organised Efforts and Initiative.
Heavy demand in Domestic and International market. And large availability of Class VI land where medicinal plants grow naturally.
Lost Opportunity to rejuvenate medicinal plants related low cost health care
Lack of assured market. Scope for Intercropping
Animal Husbandry Dairy 1. Family labour
available easily 1. Low producing
local breeds. 1. Demand for milk is ever increasing .
1. Disease outbreaks: Botulism.
2. Traditional business & hence have basic skill & knowledge.
2. Lack of awareness in Modern Techniques.
2. SHG Participation
2. Marketing of milk is difficult in rural areas.
3. Women participation
3. Majority of the farmers Financially Weak.
3. Value Addition and Processing
3. Vacancies in Dispensaries
4. SHGs presence 4. Inability of farmers to make good cows or buffaloes from calves born from artificial insemination.
4. Availability of A.I facilities
4. large volume of milk is pumped in from neighboring districts
5. 155 veterinary service centre available
5. Lack of green fodder due to limitation of irrigation and marginal land holding .
6. Low availability of dry fodder due to smaller land holding.
7. Inadequacy and complexity in availing of loan and credit facilities.
8. Cooperative or private Sector not developed.
9. Lack of modern veterinery facilities.
Poultry 1. Family labour available easily, especially 100% women participation.
1. Lack of technical knowledge to the women folks who are the real poultry rearers
1. Easily Available Local Market
1. Regular vaccination required due to lack of feed
2. Low investment in backyard poultry farmer.
2. Local breeds are low producers.
2. High Demand for Eggs and Birds.
2. Wild animal menace e.g. Mongoose, wolves, etc.,
3. People long for 3. Inadequate feed to 3. Capitalization 3. Availability of large volume of
32
desi chicken. Desi chicken has lot of demand during different festivals.
backyard poultry. of Low Cost Backyard Model.
eggs from neighbouring districts
4. Low availability of good quality Backyard breeds of chicken.
4. Bird flu
Goats 1. Easy availability
of family labour 1. Heavy Rainfall 1. Waste land
and Private forests not enclosed can be used for free range goat farming
1. Outbreak of diseases like pneumonia, ET, etc
2. Maximum women participation.
2. Lack of technical Knowledge
2. Heavy Local Demand for Meet and Manure at Taluka and district level
2. Marketing
3. Demand for Goat Manure as Organic Manure by Horticulturist.
3. Lack of Promotion 3. SHG Participation in remote villages where private forest are increasing and other employment opportunities for women are less.
4. Nutritious Goat Milk
Nonavailability of Goat Milk
FISHERIES 1 Growth Driver Sector
Few Fish Landing centres.
Deep Sea Fisheries Unexploited
Sea Shore Erosion
2 Vast and Productive Fishing Ground
Very Less land for development of infrastructural facilities.
Strengthening of Fisheries Cooperative to engage in Purchase and sale of marine Products.
Exploitation of Inshore Fishing Grounds
3 Heavy Local demand
Decreasing Catch due to over exploitation of In Shore Fishing Grounds
Farm Ponds under NHM
4 State Support Reluctance of Cooperative Societies to engage in purchase and sell of marine products.
Ornamental Fish
5 Foreign Exchange Earner
Lack of Cottage Processing.
Scope for SHG participation on Cottage level processing
6 Strong Presence of Cooperative Sector
Attractive Government Schemes
7. Participation of Women
33
8. Accessibility and Assimilation of Technology
9. Presence of Fisheries College
10.Strong Presence of Export Oriented Processing Units.
Financial Institutions 1. Strong Presence of Banks in Rural Areas
1. Reluctance towards agricultural finance.
Scope for Capacity Building of SHG and agri-finance in agriculture and allied sector
Small Sections of Society shall be deprived of low cost finance and ultimately lead to transfer of land to richer classes.
2. Complicated Loan Procedures considering capacity of farmers of small sections of society. 3. Lack of knowledge amongst farmers of lower sections about bank schemes and operations.
1. Scope for bringing vast area under project development with bank finance. 2. Scope for investment in scientific managements of plantations agriculture and allied activities with bank Finance.
Infusion of capital shall be difficult for the small farmer without bank help to invest in technology and infrastructure to improve productivity and increase production.
3.3: Accommodating SWOT- addressing issues emerging out of the analysis.
Problems and Issues in Ratnagiri District Based On the SWOT Analysis of Ratnagiri District Problems and Issues have been identified and classified into 14 broad categories. Some of these are naturally unsurmountable limitations, some weaknesses are challenges, opportunities and spheres on which the said Plan shall focus and address. A. Natural Resource Management 1. Lateritic soil having very low water holding capacity 2. Low fertile soils due to loss of organic matter 3. Acidic Soils having Ph less than 5. 4. Undulating and sloppy land 5. Large geographical area under ‘Katal’ (hard lateritic rock). 6. Large part of geographical area under waste land 7. Diversion of Fertile Agricultural Land for Non Agricultural Activities mainly urbanization. 8. Sea shore erosion 9. Heavy rainfall Area and nutrient losses and soil erosion resulting from thereon. 10. Wild animal menace. Wild Boar and monkeys. 11. Forest fires (Wanawa) B. Social Aspects 1. Stray cattle menace. 2. Farmers and Youth moving away from Agriculture especially in lower sections of society. 3. High Inflation and Price rise in comparison to other cities as a district is a heavy importer of
agriculture and horticulture produce (Except Mango) and essential commodities. 4. Lack of co-operation among the farmers. 5. Dependence on money orders from migrants 6. Farms managed by the elder people. Absentee Land Holders 7. School drop outs. 8. Lack of Government Aided Higher Education. 9. Absence of Agricultural and Revenue Land related Knowledge at Secondary School Level.
34
10. Lack of farmers organization. 11. Due to heavy migration in the past to metros, lack of agricultural work force/labour. C. Management of Agricultural Crops 1. Considerable yield gap in paddy, nagli, pulses and oilseeds due to gap in adoption of
recommended technology 2. Poor seed replacement ratio 3. Very low use of organic matter 4. Non-availability of hybrid seed of paddy i.e. ‘Sahydri’ 5. Imbalanced use of fertilizers 6. Lack of knowledge about plant protection measures 7. Land remains idle after harvesting of kharif crop 8. Lack of intercropping and mixed farming practices. 9. Lack of agriculture allied activities. D. Management of Horticultural Crops 1. Significant yield gap in fruit crops, plantation crops and vegetables due to gap in adoption of
recommended management practices. 2. Alternate bearing of mango variety ‘Alphonso’. 3. Physiological disorders like spongy tissue in ‘Alphonso’. 4. Severe attack of mango hopper. 5. Continuous flowering in mango (recurrent flowering). 6. Pre-cooling and Bavistin treatment not followed. 7. No market for cashew-apple. 8. Tea mosquito attack in cashew. 9. Old cashew plantations are of local varieties. 10. Close plantation of coconut and arecanut. 11. Non-availability of improved variety seed of vegetables. 12. High incidence of pests and diseases. 13. Irrigation is limiting factor to all horticultural crops. 14. Difficulty in raising spices as inter-crop due to close planting of coconut and arecanut. 15. Inadequate knowledge about facilities for post harvest handling and processing of fruits and
vegetables. 16. Ignorance about PHT 17. Lack of Cluster Based Marketing Efforts. 18. Low Penetration in several areas of State. 19. Due to Lack of Capital unable to hold on to raw material for processing as a result high rate
of export of raw material to southern states and loss of benefits allied to processing. 20. Lack of knowledge about floriculture. 21. Lack of allied Industries Based on Coconut.
E. Management of Livestock 1. Low availability of good quality feeds and fodder 2. Animals are mostly kept in let loose condition . 3. Castration done at later years of life that is 4 - 5 yrs of age 4. Low milk productivity. 5. Negligence towards animals. 6. Lack of irrigation facilities. 7. Poor health facilities. 8. Lack of cooperation amongst farmers in sharing Animal Management responsibilities. F. Backyard Poultry 1. High mortality of chicks and birds due to climatic changes 2. Lack of technical knowledge among women 3. Low egg production due to free range system 4. Low weight gain 5. Vaccination schedule not followed 6. Wild animal menace. 7. Insufficient availability of good quality chicks for free range system G. Goat 1. Lack of technical knowledge 2. Lack of feed and fodder
35
3. Lack of graded bucks for breeding 4. Lack of proper housing 5. Low weight gain 6. High mortality due to pneumonia etc. H. Management of Marine Capture Fisheries 1. Over mechanization 2. Over exploitation of inshore fishing ground 3. Improper implementation of fishing regulations like closed season, depth of fishing and mesh
size regulations 4. Decrease in catch per unit effort 5. Large number of purse-seiners 6. Pollution 7. Catch forecast not available I. Aquaculture 1. Non-availability of seed and feed J. Management of forestry and medicinal plants 1. Deforestation 2. Lack of knowledge about medicinal plants and their medicinal use 3. Non-availability of planting material of medicinal plants 4. Low rates for forest and medicinal produce (Irregular marketing practices) 5. Unprotected forest area K. Infrastructure Facilities 1. Lack of cold storage facilities for fruit crops and fisheries 2. Inadequate agro-processing facilities 3. Lack of transport facilities (ordinary transport and refrigerated vans) 4. Lack of processing units for medicinal plants 6. Lack of training centres 7. Lack of fish landing centres 8. Lack of drying platforms 9. Lack of ice plants 10. Lack of milk collection and chilling centers 11. Lack of veterinary aid centres 12. Lack of soil and water conservation structure L. Financial 1. Complicated loaning procedures 2. Insufficient loan amount 3. High rate of interest 4. No financial help for new gillnet (Towari Jali) M. Human Resource Management 1. Lack of skilled labourers 2. Non-availability of labour during peak period 3. High wages 4. Insufficient number of trained extension persons 5. Technical and managerial incompetence. 10 Lack of Cooperation in Livelihood Activities. Farmers Both Big and Small Individualistic in Nature. Big Farmers Predatory in Nature and Small Farmers Lack Vision and Knowledge. N. Marketing 1. Inaccessibility of markets 2. Exploitations by middlemen 3. No information regarding market price (market intelligence) 4. No subsidy on marketing 5. Lack of commodity based organisation 6. Unorganized market leading to distress sale of produce 7. No Regulated Markets. 8. No co-operative marketing.
36
N. Policy Matter 1. Revenue records (7/12 extract) are not updated. Lack of Clarity in Land Titles. 2. No supply of planting material in time. 3. Ownership problem of leased land holders. 4. Non-availability of irrigation water at the time of sowing i.e. November onwards. 5. Fishing villages do not have sufficient landing space. 6. Upliftment of small fishermen.
3.4: Sectoral/ Regional Growth Drivers of the District
Horticulture, Fisheries and Tourism are the major Regional Growth Drivers of the District. Other sectors mainly Agriculture continues to be subsistance while, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Sector show negative growth. Horticulture While Horticulture Sector has growth Driven several individual success stories. Horticulture took root by way of Alphonso Mango Plantations and was developed in adverse conditions until Horticulture Plantations were encouraged under Employment Guarantee Scheme, Banks came forward to lend to traditionally big land holding families and their self developed entreprenueral zeal saw several individuals and families make giant leaps in terms of horticultural plantations, constructing processing facilities and going in for product development and penetrating the state and international market with self developed product ranges of a variety of food products mainly based on horticultural major and minor produce. The sector has also sprung a new breed of growers who have taken on lease those plantations whose management is not possible for the farmers for reasons of unviable trade, family or other labour shortage or absentee landowners. Such areas are taken on long/short term or seasonal lease. Such growers have linkages with traders in the APMC markets of Mumbai, Pune and Western Maharashtra who provide them with funds for pating contract money and management costs. In principle soil fertility of such areas are the responsibility of the farmers/owner but it is seldom taken care of. This sub-sector is a seller market as such traders are forced to fork the moneys demanded by farmers especially those which have large areas and these traders them resort to the incessant use of paclobutrozol to reaped sustained harvests. This has lead to the physiological disorder of Spongy Tissue in Alphonso Mango. Progressive farmers are now adopting good agricultural practices in Alphonso Mango to get their plantations certified as per GLOBALGAP standards for export to US, Europe and Japan. Farmers are also now moving in a big way towards organic management for soil fertility and setting up of Pack Houses and Grading Sorting Houses. In the talukas bordering the Sahyadri range, Rajapur, Lanja, Sangmeshwar, Chiplun, Khed have seen massive deforestations on private lands to cater to the domestic and industrual needs of Western Maharashtra. Such lands cleared at the cost to the felling contractor reap the farmers short term gain and clear his lands for Cashew Plantations. As such more area in the district comes under cashew plantation than Alphonso. Path breaking interventions in processing of Cashew Apple shall see a massive surge in realization within the sector and farmers would have incomes generated for further investment to improve productivity and production of cashew plantations. Coconut is mainly Backyard cultuvation in the small holdings around the dwelling units of thedr farmers. But managementless plantations are productive due to natural advantages only in the coastal talukas. Since the area is a heavy consumer of coconut and multipurpose scope for bringing other parts of the tree there is tremendous scope for area expansion multi cropping under Lakhi Baag Yojana with intensive extension and facilities for exploitation of ground water. Traditionally a coastal crop, Large Scientific Plantations of Banana based on planting material from Tissue Culture Laboratories, irrigation by drip have become successful and several farmers SHGs, individual farmers d FIGs have begun going in for large scale plantations mainly of the Grand 9 variety. Banana a poor mans health food is in substantual demand in the district where the annual consumption is estimated to be 3,00,000 tonnes per annum. Fisheries The fisheries sector has mainly been a community or cooperative movement driven growth. Sensing the great export potential the government has been liberal to the sector in providing capital to the fisheries cooperative sociieties, diesel on subsidized rates and bank finance and subsidies on building of new vessels and mechanization. The allied spawning of processing export houses in the
37
district created the potential to absorb the surplus catches and process them for export. The sector has changed the face of the fishing community from a subsistance community to a high spending and income generating community. Since production is a natural phenomenon, the sector has also been able to improvise and acquire modern technology for improving catches. Extension and encouragement to fishermen to go into deep sea into the area which is unexplored for technical difficulties shall see decongestion of the inshore fishing areas and healthy fishing environment. Similarly innovative fishing grounds such as farm ponds under the National Horticulture Mission and inland fisheries in ponds shall see the fish catch rising and within the grasp of the common man. Tourism Blessed with unpolluted, scenic beauty, rich history of coastal sea forts, paces of religious importance and a wide variety of locations to visit, domestic tourism as well as business tourism is picking up like rage in the district. Agro tourism has picked up in Alphonso Plantations in scenic locations and tourism sector offers the most exciting prospects for growth of entreprenuers, employment and wealth generation. Still places of interest in the Sahyadri range are still to be propogated. Massive capacity building in low cost tourism is required to capitalize on the opportunities offered for supplementary growth of the farmers.
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Infrastructure 8 197.66 251.91 641.73 1835.09 0.00 4627.89
Production 10 235.77 303.28 656.87 825.99 825.99 2847.90
18 433.43 555.19 1298.60 2661.08 825.99 7475.79
Infrastructure 4 186.59 166.61 193.68 545.40 595.32 1687.60
Production 5 311.23 41.16 183.70 335.93 335.93 1207.95
9 497.82 207.77 377.38 881.33 931.25 2895.55
Infrastructure 5 2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 7919.31 8120.06 22087.19
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 7919.31 8120.06 22087.19
Infrastructure 10 0.00 48.37 17.43 949.10 833.00 1847.90
Production 12 135.66 63.03 47.36 927.55 813.05 1986.65
22 135.66 111.40 64.79 1876.65 1646.05 3834.55
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure 6 781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36
Infrastructure 5 5.55 110.60 1973.85 568.40 164.85 2823.25
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 5.55 110.60 1973.85 568.40 164.85 2823.25
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00
Infrastructure 38 0.00 0.00 0.00 14243.45 12139.38 42159.19
Production 29 682.66 407.47 887.93 2089.47 2004.97 6072.50
67 682.66 407.47 887.93 16332.92 14144.35 48231.69
Ratnagiri
7Coopertaive
and Marketing
Sub Total
8Sericulture
Sub Total
9Social forestry
Sub Total
Grand Total
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,
5 Dairy
Sub Total
6Fishery
Sub Total
3Soil
Conservation
Sub Total
4Animal
husbandary
Sub Total
1Agriculture
Sub Total
2Horticulture
Sub Total
Abstract Infrastructure and assests stream and Production and growth for proposed and ongoing sheme
Sr. No.
Name of Department Stream Number of
shemes
Yearwise Program Total
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total Total (8+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Integrated cereal development program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.13 67.13 112.26 112.26
2 Integrated oilseed development program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.02 13.52 24.54 24.54
3 Soil Helth card program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.47 7.47 14.94 14.94
4 Support for agric. extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00
5 . Strengthening of Agro-Polyclinics 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
6 Strengthening Taluka Seed Farm 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
7 Agriculture Mechanisation 0.00 0.00 39 100.00 150.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289.00
8 Organic Farming Promotion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.37 11.37 22.74 22.74
9 NFSM pulses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.42 3.51 14.34 30.00 30.00 80.27 80.27
10 Maintaining Agriculture Statistics 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
11 crop sap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 172.50 195.00 152.00 160.00 160.00 839.50 839.50
12 Rainfed Agricultrue development programme 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 Dryland farming mission 0.00 0.00 266.14 338.77 710.67 1315.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1315.58
14 Rainfed Agricultrue development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15 Partcipaton of women in agriculture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.90 0.90
0.00 0.00 305.14 442.77 864.67 1612.58 174.92 198.51 166.34 268.44 292.94 1101.15 2713.73
1 Strengthening of Govt Nursery 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
2 Planting material development in nurseries 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 120.00 120.00
3 Micor irrigation 20.28 32.50 17.98 20.00 60.00 150.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.76
4 NHM 219.92 208.43 319.65 199.38 445.32 1392.70 101.50 66.50 25.39 18.93 30.00 242.32 1635.02
5 EGS Horticulture 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 175.00 325.00 325.00
6 Coconut Devlopment Board Aided Scheme 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 50.00
240.20 240.93 337.63 269.38 555.32 1643.46 121.50 86.50 45.39 213.93 270.00 737.32 2380.78
1 IWMP 1888.63 2209.41 1178.69 1944.78 74.78 7296.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7296.29
2 NWDPRA 147.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.83
3 Jalyut shivar Abhiyan 0.00 0.00 623.26 4179.25 6000.00 10802.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10802.51
2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 6124.03 6074.78 18246.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18246.63Total
Agriculture
Horticulture
Soil Conservation
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Ongoing sheme (Infrastructure and production)
Infrastructure and assests stream Production and growth
Total
Total
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total Total (8+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Infrastructure and assests stream Production and growth
1 Establishment of gokul grams under Rashtriya Gokul Mission 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00
2 Establishment of mobile extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00
3 Supply of mini setter and Hatchers of 5000 eggs capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 53.00 106.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106.00
4 Mobile Marketing 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
5 Faciliating Market 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
6 Introduction of power driven chaff cutter 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00
7 Supply of Veternary mobile Units cum Diagnostic Laboraties 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00
8 modernaxation of veterinary Dispensaries, Gr.1 for online data entry 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.45 0.00 16.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.45
0.00 0.00 0.00 923.45 833.00 1756.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1756.45
1 Establishment Of fish seed Farm 19.62 2.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 37.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.12
2 Grant of subsidy on fishery Requisite - non mechanized boats 13.99 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 83.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.99
3 Nylon Twine 0.77 0.85 0.99 1.15 1.15 4.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.91
4 Mechnization of Fishing Crafts (80% Central Assistance) 696.32 1071.90 652.01 800.00 800.00 4020.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4020.23
5 Dev. Of infrastructure facilities on fish landing 50.59 98.59 123.83 100.00 100.00 473.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 473.01
6 Development of Fishing Harbours 0 0.00 1466.10 1500.00 1500.00 4466.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4466.10
781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9085.36
1 Mangroov Plantation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
2 Casurina Plantation by group formation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
3057.95 3634.18 4712.65 10185.78 10753.92 32344.48 296.42 285.01 211.73 482.37 592.94 1868.47 34212.95
RatnagiriDistrict Supretending Agriculture Officer,
Animal Husbandary
Grand Total
Total
Fishery
Social Forestry
Total
Total
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Agro-polyclinic mobile van 1 Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.000 50.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.000 50.00
1 Subsidy on mini tempo for transport of vegetables 25 tempo x 2 labor @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 45.000 90.00
2 Mango cashew Board 0.00 0.00 200.00 250.00 300.000 750.00
0.00 0.00 200.00 295.00 345.00 840.00
1 Construction of Farm ponds in rice field for protective irrigation. 4000 ponds x Rs 52264 size- 20 x 20 x 3 m
0.00 0.00 0.00 1045.28 1045.280 2090.56
2 lining of farms ponds (20 x 20 x 3 m)3000 ponds 0.00 0.00 0.00 750.00 1000.000 1750.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1795.28 2045.28 3840.56
1 Establishment of Gokul grams under Rashtriya Gokul Mission 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 1000.00
2 Establishment of Mobile extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00
3 Supply of mini setter and Hatchers of 5000 eggs capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 53.00 106.00
4 Mobile Marketing 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00
5 Faciliating Market 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00
6 Introduction of power driven chaff cutter 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
7 Supply of Veternary Mobile Units cum Diagnostic Laboraties 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00
8 Modernazation of veterinary Dispensaries, Gr.1 for online data entry 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.35 0.00 26.35
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 933.35 833.00 1766.35
0.00 0.00 200.00 3073.63 3223.28 6496.91
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Infrastructure and assests stream
Agriculture
Total
Horticulture
Total
Ratnagiri
Soil Conservation
Total
Animal Husbandary
Grand Total
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Incentives for hybrid seed growers for seed production Subsidy 50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.28 16.28 32.56
2 Supply of Urea DAP bricket on 50% subsidy 10% area per year 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.10 56.10 112.20
3 Supply of improved seed Wal, Gram & Cowpea @50 % subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 35.00 35.00 70.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 107.38 107.38 214.76
1 Coconut supply of pheromone traps for control of Red Palm Weevil . @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 2.50 2.50 5.00
2 Supply of pheromone traps for control of Rhinoceros beetle @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 2.50 2.50 5.00
3 Drum stick PKM 1&2 (hybrid) 5/ plants 40000 plants x Rs 10 @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 11.25 11.25 22.50
4 Contract farming for vegetables 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 16.25 16.25 32.50
1 A.I. Delivery System under RKVY 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00
2 clean milk production 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.25 31.25 62.50
3 Assistance to farmers for promotion of intergrated live stalk farming on 25% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 625.00 1250.00
4 Distrubution of fodder seed 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
5 Establishment of silage making unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
6 Fodder production form fallow lands 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
7 Establishment of Hydroponics fodder production unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
8 Establishment of Azolla production unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
9 Stall fed 40+2 goat unit by punyashlok Ahiyadevi Maharashtra Mendi va Sheli vikas mahamandal 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 925.75 811.25 1737.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1049.38 934.88 1984.26
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Production and growth
Animal Husbandary
Total
Grand Total
Total
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,Ratnagiri
Agriculture
Total
Horticulture
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin Fin
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Infrastructure 8 197.66 251.91 641.73 1835.09 0.00 4627.89
Production 10 235.77 303.28 656.87 825.99 825.99 2847.90
18 433.43 555.19 1298.60 2661.08 825.99 7475.79
Infrastructure 4 186.59 166.61 193.68 545.40 595.32 1687.60
Production 5 311.23 41.16 183.70 335.93 335.93 1207.95
9 497.82 207.77 377.38 881.33 931.25 2895.55
Infrastructure 5 2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 7919.31 8120.06 22087.19
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 7919.31 8120.06 22087.19
Infrastructure 10 0.00 48.37 17.43 949.10 833.00 1847.90
Production 12 135.66 63.03 47.36 927.55 813.05 1986.65
22 135.66 111.40 64.79 1876.65 1646.05 3834.55
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure 6 781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36
Infrastructure 5 5.55 110.60 1973.85 568.40 164.85 2823.25
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 5.55 110.60 1973.85 568.40 164.85 2823.25
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Production 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00
Infrastructure 38 0.00 0.00 0.00 14243.45 12139.38 42159.19
Production 29 682.66 407.47 887.93 2089.47 2004.97 6072.50
67 682.66 407.47 887.93 16332.92 14144.35 48231.69
Abstract Infrastructure and assests stream and Production and growth for proposed and ongoing sheme
Sr.
No.
Name of
Department Stream
Number of
shemes
Yearwise Program
Total
1Agriculture
Sub Total
2Horticulture
Sub Total
3
Soil
Conservation
Sub Total
4
Animal
husbandary
Sub Total
5 Dairy
Sub Total
6Fishery
Sub Total
Ratnagiri
7
Coopertaive
and Marketing
Sub Total
8Sericulture
Sub Total
9Social forestry
Sub Total
Grand Total
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total Total (8+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Integrated cereal development program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.13 67.13 112.26 112.26
2 Integrated oilseed development program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.02 13.52 24.54 24.54
3 Soil Helth card program 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.47 7.47 14.94 14.94
4 Support for agric. extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00
5 . Strengthening of Agro-Polyclinics 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
6 Strengthening Taluka Seed Farm 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
7 Agriculture Mechanisation 0.00 0.00 39 100.00 150.00 289.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289.00
8 Organic Farming Promotion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.37 11.37 22.74 22.74
9 NFSM pulses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.42 3.51 14.34 30.00 30.00 80.27 80.27
10 Maintaining Agriculture Statistics 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
11 crop sap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 172.50 195.00 152.00 160.00 160.00 839.50 839.50
12 Rainfed Agricultrue development programme 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 Dryland farming mission 0.00 0.00 266.14 338.77 710.67 1315.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1315.58
14 Rainfed Agricultrue development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15 Partcipaton of women in agriculture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.90 0.90
0.00 0.00 305.14 442.77 864.67 1612.58 174.92 198.51 166.34 268.44 292.94 1101.15 2713.73
1 Strengthening of Govt Nursery 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
2 Planting material development in nurseries 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 120.00 120.00
3 Micor irrigation 20.28 32.50 17.98 20.00 60.00 150.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.76
4 NHM 219.92 208.43 319.65 199.38 445.32 1392.70 101.50 66.50 25.39 18.93 30.00 242.32 1635.02
5 EGS Horticulture 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 175.00 325.00 325.00
6 Coconut Devlopment Board Aided Scheme 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 50.00
240.20 240.93 337.63 269.38 555.32 1643.46 121.50 86.50 45.39 213.93 270.00 737.32 2380.78
1 IWMP 1888.63 2209.41 1178.69 1944.78 74.78 7296.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7296.29
2 NWDPRA 147.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147.83
3 Jalyut shivar Abhiyan 0.00 0.00 623.26 4179.25 6000.00 10802.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10802.51
2036.46 2209.41 1801.95 6124.03 6074.78 18246.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18246.63
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Ongoing sheme (Infrastructure and production)
Infrastructure and assests stream Production and growth
Total
Total
Total
Agriculture
Horticulture
Soil Conservation
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total Total (8+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Infrastructure and assests stream Production and growth
Agriculture
1 Establishment of gokul grams under Rashtriya Gokul Mission 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 1000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00
2 Establishment of mobile extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00
3 Supply of mini setter and Hatchers of 5000 eggs capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 53.00 106.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106.00
4 Mobile Marketing 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
5 Faciliating Market 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
6 Introduction of power driven chaff cutter 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00
7 Supply of Veternary mobile Units cum Diagnostic Laboraties 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00
8modernaxation of veterinary Dispensaries, Gr.1 for online data
entry0.00 0.00 0.00 16.45 0.00 16.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.45
0.00 0.00 0.00 923.45 833.00 1756.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1756.45
1 Establishment Of fish seed Farm 19.62 2.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 37.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.12
2 Grant of subsidy on fishery Requisite - non mechanized boats 13.99 10.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 83.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.99
3 Nylon Twine 0.77 0.85 0.99 1.15 1.15 4.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.91
4 Mechnization of Fishing Crafts (80% Central Assistance) 696.32 1071.90 652.01 800.00 800.00 4020.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4020.23
5 Dev. Of infrastructure facilities on fish landing 50.59 98.59 123.83 100.00 100.00 473.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 473.01
6 Development of Fishing Harbours 0 0.00 1466.10 1500.00 1500.00 4466.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4466.10
781.29 1183.84 2267.93 2426.15 2426.15 9085.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9085.36
1 Mangroov Plantation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
2 Casurina Plantation by group formation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
3057.95 3634.18 4712.65 10185.78 10753.92 32344.48 296.42 285.01 211.73 482.37 592.94 1868.47 34212.95
Ratnagiri
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,
Animal Husbandary
Grand Total
Total
Fishery
Social Forestry
Total
Total
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Agro-polyclinic mobile van 1 Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.000 50.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.000 50.00
1 Subsidy on mini tempo for transport of vegetables
25 tempo x 2 labor @ 50% subsidy0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 45.000 90.00
2 Mango cashew Board 0.00 0.00 200.00 250.00 300.000 750.00
0.00 0.00 200.00 295.00 345.00 840.00
1
Construction of Farm ponds in rice field for
protective irrigation. 4000 ponds x Rs 52264 size- 20
x 20 x 3 m
0.00 0.00 0.00 1045.28 1045.280 2090.56
2 lining of farms ponds (20 x 20 x 3 m)3000 ponds 0.00 0.00 0.00 750.00 1000.000 1750.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1795.28 2045.28 3840.56
1Establishment of Gokul grams under Rashtriya Gokul
Mission0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 1000.00
2 Establishment of Mobile extension 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00
3Supply of mini setter and Hatchers of 5000 eggs
capacity0.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 53.00 106.00
4 Mobile Marketing 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00
5 Faciliating Market 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 200.00
6 Introduction of power driven chaff cutter 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
7Supply of Veternary Mobile Units cum Diagnostic
Laboraties0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00
8Modernazation of veterinary Dispensaries, Gr.1 for
online data entry0.00 0.00 0.00 26.35 0.00 26.35
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 933.35 833.00 1766.35
0.00 0.00 200.00 3073.63 3223.28 6496.91
Ratnagiri
Soil Conservation
Total
Animal Husbandary
Grand Total
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Infrastructure and assests stream
Agriculture
Total
Horticulture
Total
Sr.no Name of the scheme 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Incentives for hybrid seed growers for seed
production Subsidy 50%0.00 0.00 0.00 16.28 16.28 32.56
2 Supply of Urea DAP bricket on 50% subsidy 10%
area per year 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.10 56.10 112.20
3 Supply of improved seed Wal, Gram & Cowpea
@50 % subsidy0.00 0.00 0.000 35.00 35.00 70.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 107.38 107.38 214.76
1 Coconut supply of pheromone traps for control of
Red Palm Weevil . @ 50% subsidy 0.00 0.00 0.000 2.50 2.50 5.00
2 Supply of pheromone traps for control of Rhinoceros
beetle @ 50% subsidy0.00 0.00 0.000 2.50 2.50 5.00
3 Drum stick PKM 1&2 (hybrid) 5/ plants 40000 plants
x Rs 10 @ 50% subsidy0.00 0.00 0.000 11.25 11.25 22.50
4 Contract farming for vegetables 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 16.25 16.25 32.50
1 A.I. Delivery System under RKVY 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 150.00
2 clean milk production 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.25 31.25 62.50
3Assistance to farmers for promotion of intergrated live
stalk farming on 25% subsidy0.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 625.00 1250.00
4 Distrubution of fodder seed 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
5 Establishment of silage making unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
6 Fodder production form fallow lands 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00
7 Establishment of Hydroponics fodder production unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
8 Establishment of Azolla production unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 30.00
9Stall fed 40+2 goat unit by punyashlok Ahiyadevi
Maharashtra Mendi va Sheli vikas mahamandal0.00 0.00 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 925.75 811.25 1737.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1049.38 934.88 1984.26
District Supretending Agriculture Officer,
Ratnagiri
Agriculture
Total
Horticulture
Proposed financial out-lay for C-DAP 2012-13 to 2016-17, Disctrict - Ratnagiri Production and growth
Animal Husbandary
Total
Grand Total
Total