1
optical Antenna Gain. 2:Receiving Antennas. Errata John J. Degnan and Bernard J. Klein NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Mary- land 20771. Received 27 September 1974. The quantity ω, incorrectly defined in the paper by Deg- nan and Klein 1 in the sentence containing Eq. (16), corre- sponds to the radius to the 1/e (not 1/e 2 ) intensity point in the Gaussian local oscillator distribution. Please note that the latter definition is at variance with the more com- mon definition of ω as the radius to the 1/e field (l/e 2 in- tensity) point. The traditional definition was used in Part 1 of our paper describing transmitted Gaussian beams. References 1. J. J. Degnan and B. J. Klein, Appl. Opt. 13, 2397 (1974). 2762 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 13. No. 12 / December 1974

Computer Generated Hologram; Null Lens Test of Aspheric Wavefronts

  • Upload
    p-k

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Computer Generated Hologram; Null Lens Test of Aspheric Wavefronts

optical Antenna Gain. 2:Receiving Antennas. Errata John J. Degnan and Bernard J. Klein

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Mary­land 20771. Received 27 September 1974. The quantity ω, incorrectly defined in the paper by Deg-

nan and Klein1 in the sentence containing Eq. (16), corre­sponds to the radius to the 1/e (not 1/e2) intensity point in the Gaussian local oscillator distribution. Please note that the latter definition is at variance with the more com­mon definition of ω as the radius to the 1/e field (l/e2 in­tensity) point. The traditional definition was used in Part 1 of our paper describing transmitted Gaussian beams.

References 1. J. J. Degnan and B. J. Klein, Appl. Opt. 13, 2397 (1974).

2762 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 13. No. 12 / December 1974