Updated 6-19-19

CURRICULUM VITAE

VALERIE P. HANS

PERSONAL

Address: 104 Myron Taylor Hall

Cornell Law School

Ithaca, NY 14853

Office: 607-255-0095

Fax: 607-255-7193

Email: valerie.hans@cornell.edu

Web pages:

http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/faculty/bio.cfm?id=27 (bio page,

Cornell Law School)

http://courses2.cit.cornell.edu/sociallaw/index.html (Social Science and

Law web page)

EDUCATION

1973 B.A. With Highest Honors, Psychology, University of California at San Diego.

1974 M.A., Social Psychology, University of Toronto.

M.A. Thesis Title: The Effect of Criminal Record on Individual and Group Judgments

of Guilt in a Jury Simulation Paradigm. Thesis Supervisor: Anthony N. Doob.

1978 Ph.D., Social Psychology, University of Toronto.

Ph.D. Dissertation Title: The Effects of the Unanimity Requirement on Group Decision Processes

in Simulated Juries. Dissertation Supervisor: Anthony N. Doob.

ACADEMIC AWARDS

Public Voices Fellowship, The Op-Ed Project, 2017.

Stan Wheeler Mentorship Award, Law and Society Association, 2012 (“for outstanding mentorship of

law and society scholars”).

Paul Klebnikov Rule of Law Fellowship, sponsored by the Paul Klebnikov Fund, an activity of the Train

Foundation, October 17-Nov. 2, 2011.

Cornell University Institute for Social Science Faculty Fellow, 2009-2012. Theme Project: Judgment,

Decision Making, and Social Behavior.

Jan Burrows Graduate Educator Award, Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of

Delaware, 1999.

Fellow, 1998 Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education, University of Delaware.

Fellow, Center for Advanced Study, University of Delaware, 1996-1997.

National Science Foundation Visiting Professorship for Women, 1993-1994.

NIMH Fellowship in Law and Psychology, Stanford University, 1986-1987.

Fellow, Salzburg Seminar on American Law and Legal Institutions, Salzburg, Austria, 1986.

Finalist, Judicial Fellows Program, United States Supreme Court, 1986 (withdrew to accept NIMH

Fellowship).

Ontario Graduate Scholarship, 1975-1977.

University of Toronto Open Fellowship, 1973-1975.

Mary Beatty Fellowship, 1973-1974.

University of California Regents Scholarship, 1970-1973.

- 2 - POSITIONS AND TEACHING EXPERIENCE

Charles F. Rechlin Professor of Law, Cornell Law School (November 2018-present).

Professor of Law, Cornell Law School (February 2006-November 2018)

Graduate fields: Law, Human Development

Affiliated Faculty, Graduate Concentration in Law, Psychology, & Human Development

Affiliated Faculty, Dual Degree Program in Law & Human Development

Affiliated Scholar, East Asia Program (2009-present).

Visiting Scholar (August 2005-January 2006).

Law courses offered: Colloquium on Empirical Legal Studies, Contemporary American Jury, Social

Science and the Law; Torts. Undergraduate courses: Judging the Jury, Psychology and the Law.

Bennett University School of Law, Greater Noida, India (January 14-18, 2019). Taught short course on

Psychology and Law.

Faculty Exchange Visitor, program cosponsored by Cornell Law School, Thailand Institute of Justice and

Thai Bar Association (Jan. 7-20, 2018). Lectured to judges, lawyers, academic faculty, students, and

the public. Met with executives and researchers of Thailand Institute of Justice, with executives of

the Criminal Court, and with members of the Subcommittee on National Reform Committee on

Criminal Justice.

University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Cornell Law School Faculty Exchange visitor for 2017 (April 1-

24, 2017).

Buchmann School of Law, Tel Aviv University, Cornell Law School Faculty Exchange visitor for 2014-

2015. Taught course on Comparative Law and Social Science.

Summer Institutes of International and Comparative Law (cosponsored by Cornell Law School and the

Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne) (2007, 2010, 2012, 2014). Courses offered: Law and Social

Science: A Comparative Perspective (2007); Comparative Law and Social Science (2010, 2012);

Trial by Jury: A Global Perspective (2014).

Profesora Colaboradora Honorífica en el Área de Derecho Procesal de la Universidad de Burgos, 2013-

2014.

Professeur invité, l’Ecole de Droit de la Sorbonne, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France,

March 2012. Lectured in two Master of Laws programs: (1) the Master de Droit pénal et politiques

criminelles en Europe, and 2) the Master de théorie et pratique du process.

Short course, Contemporary American Jury, University of Illinois College of Law, October 6-10, 2008.

Faculty member, 2008 Summer Law Institute, Workshop in International Business Transactions with

Chinese Characteristics, Kenneth Wang School of Law, Suzhou, China (cosponsored by Cornell

Law School, Kenneth Wang School of Law, and Bucerius Law School).

Professor Emerita, University of Delaware (effective February 2006).

Professor of Sociology & Criminal Justice; Professor of Psychology; University of Delaware, 1991-

2006. Secondary appointments in Legal Studies Program (1998-2006); Women's Studies Program

(1987-1999).

Director, Legal Studies Program, 1995-1996; 1998-2000.

Associate Professor, 1985-1991; Assistant Professor 1980-1985.

Undergraduate courses included: Psychology and the Law, Problems of the Criminal Judiciary,

Judging the Jury, The Law and You, Social Science and the Law, Women in the Criminal Justice

System, Research on Women, and Introduction to Legal Studies.

- 3 - Graduate course offered: Social Science, Law, and the Legal Process.

Visiting Scholar and Adjunct Professor, University of Pennsylvania School of Law (2000-2001).

Taught seminar on The Contemporary American Jury in Spring 2001.

Visiting Professor, Department of Legal Studies, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

(1993-1994). Lectured on law and social science, lay judgments of corporate responsibility, and

jury decision making. (Sponsored by NSF Visiting Professorship for Women Program).

Visiting Scholar, Stanford Law School and Visiting Fellow, Department of Psychology, Stanford

University (1986-1987). Taught graduate seminar (cross-listed in the Department of Psychology

and the Law School) on Jury Decision Making.

Visiting Professor, Faculty Exchange Program, Department of Law, University College, Cardiff, Wales

(February-May, 1982). I gave lectures on the American legal system and the jury.

Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Criminology, Simon Fraser University (1979-1980).

Courses included: Undergraduate courses on Psychological Explanations of Criminal and Deviant

Behavior, and The Judicial Process; and a graduate course on Women in the Criminal Justice

System.

Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University (1978-1979). Courses

included: Group Dynamics (undergraduate and graduate courses), Introductory Social Psychology,

and Psychology and the Law.

Lecturer, University of Toronto (1976-1978).

Courses included: Introductory Psychology and Current Topics in Social Psychology.

PUBLICATIONS

Books

Robbennolt, J. K., & Hans, V. P. (2016). The psychology of tort law. New York: NYU Press.

Hans, V. P., & Gastil, J. (Eds.). (2014). El juicio por jurados: Investigaciones sobre la deliberacíon, el

veredicto y la democracia. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ad Hoc.

Works by Valerie P. Hans, John Gastil, and their coauthors, translated into Spanish by Andrés

Harfuch and his colleagues.

Includes a prologue by Andrés Harfuch & a preface by Valerie P. Hans & John Gastil (pp. 15-18).

Vidmar, N., & Hans, V. P. (2007). American juries: The verdict. NY: Prometheus Books.

Japanese translation by Takashi Maruta and colleagues, published by Nippon Hyoron Sha, Tokyo,

Japan (December 2009), with a new preface by Vidmar and Hans.

Revised version of final chapter published as: Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (2008). The verdict on

juries. Judicature, 91, 226-230.

Hans, V. P. (Ed.) (2006). The jury system: Contemporary scholarship. Hampshire, England: Ashgate

Publishing Ltd.

Hans, V. P. (2000). Business on trial: The civil jury and corporate responsibility. New Haven: Yale

University Press.

Scales used in the research to measure attitudes toward business and attitudes toward civil

litigation are reprinted in L. S. Wrightsman, A. L. Batson, & V. A. Edkins. (Eds.) (2004)

Measurement of legal attitudes (pp. 169-172). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.

- 4 -

Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., & Lawrence, S. (Eds.) (1998). Crossing boundaries:

Traditions and transformations in law and society research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University

Press.

Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., & Lawrence, S. (Eds.) (1998). Everyday practices and

trouble cases. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. NY: Plenum Press. Reissued by Perseus Press

(1991).

* Excerpted in: R. H. Field, B. Kaplan and K. Clermont (Eds.) (2007). Civil procedure: Materials

for a basic course, 9th ed. [and 3 earlier editions]. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press; S. H. Kadish &

S. J. Schulhofer (Eds.) (1989). Criminal law and its processes: Cases and materials, 5th ed. (p. 378).

Boston: Little Brown; S. Landsman, Readings on adversarial justice: The American approach to

adjudication (pp. 159-169). St. Paul, MN: West Group.

* Cited by United States Supreme Court in J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994);

Third Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. Scarfo, 850 F.2d 1015 (1988); Fourth Circuit Court of

Appeals in U.S. v. Evans, 917 F.2d 800 (1990); Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. Johnson,

892 F.2d 707 (1989); Superior Court of Delaware in State v. Pennell, 583 A. 2d 1348 (1990).

Journal Issues Edited

Marder, N. S., & Hans, V. P. (2016). Special issue: Juries and mixed tribunals across the globe: New

developments, common challenges and future directions. Oňati Socio-legal Series [online], 6 (2).

Available at: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/issue/view/55.

Marder, N. S., & Hans, V. P. (2015). Symposium: Juries and Lay Participation: American Perspectives

and Global Trends. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 90 (3).

Fukurai, H., & Hans, V. P. (Eds.) (2012). Special section: Lay adjudication in East Asia. Yonsei Law

Journal, 3 (1).

Hans, V. P., Rachlinski, J. J., & Owens, E. G. (Eds.) (2011). Judgment by the numbers: Converting

qualitative to quantitative judgments in law. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8 (Special Issue 1).

Hans, V. P. (Ed.). (2003). Special issue: Lay participation in law. Law & Policy, 25 (2).

Hans, V. P. (Ed.) (1990). Special issue: Law and the media. Law and Human Behavior, 14 (5).

Martinez, R., Jr., & Hans, V. P. (Eds.) (1994). Special issue: Race, ethnicity, and the law. Law and

Human Behavior, 18 (3).

Articles and Book Chapters

Cardi, J., Hans, V. P., & Parks, G. (forthcoming 2020). Do black injuries matter? Implicit racial bias and

juror decision making in tort cases. Southern California Law Review.

Reed, K., Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (in press). Accounting for awards: An examination of juror

reasoning behind pain and suffering awards. Denver Law Review, 94 (Issue 4).

Hans, V. P. (2019). 50 aňos de investigación empírica sobre el jurado. Hallazgos y aportes para su

mejoramiento [50 years of empirical research on the jury. Findings and implications for its

improvement]. In Alberto M. Binder & Andrés Harfuch (Eds), Teoría y práctica del juicio por

- 5 -

jurados (pp. 136-152). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ad Hoc Publishers [Spanish translation of

presentation and dialogue with session chair].

Helm, R. K., & Hans, V. P. (2019). Procedural roles: Professional judges, lay judges, and lay jurors. In

Darryl Brown, Jenia I. Turner, & Bettina Weisser (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminal

Process (pp. 209-228). NY: Oxford University Press.

Hritz, A. C., Royer, C. E., & Hans, V. P. (2019). Diminishing support for the death penalty: Implications

for fair capital case outcomes. In C. Najdowski & M. Stevenson (Eds.), Criminal Juries in the 21st

Century: Psychological Science and the Law (pp. 41-59). NY: Oxford University Press.

Burd, K. A., & Hans, V. P. (2018). Reasoned verdicts: Oversold? Cornell International Law Journal, 51

(2), 319-360.

Hans, V. P., & Saks, M. J. (2018). Improving judge and jury evaluation of scientific evidence. Daedalus,

147 (4), 164-180.

Hans, V. P. (2018). Do jurors hear the oven bird’s song? In Mary Nell Trautner (Ed.), Insiders, Outsiders,

Injuries & Law: Revisiting “The Oven Bird’s Song” (pp. 98-112). Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Hans, V. P., Helm, R. K, & Reyna, V. F. (2018). From meaning to money: Translating injury into dollars.

Law and Human Behavior, 42, 95-109. Doi: 10.1037/lhb0000282. Pre-publication copy at:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3123790.

Hagan, J., & Hans, V. P. (2017). Procedural justice theory and public policy: An exchange. Annual

Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 1-3. Available at:

http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121416-011426

Hans, V. P. (2017). Dignity takings, dignity restoration: A tort law perspective. Chicago-Kent Law

Review, 92, 715-723.

Hans, V. P. (2017). Trial by jury: Story of a legal transplant (presidential address). Law & Society

Review, 51, 471-499.

Hans, V. P. (2017). Foreword. In J. Goodman-Delahunty & D. K. Das (Eds.), Trends in Legal Advocacy,

Vol. 1 (pp. xi-xii). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

Hans, V. P., Fukurai, H., Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Park, J. (2017). Global juries: A plan for research. In M.

B. Kovera (ed.), The Psychology of Juries: Current Knowledge and a Research Agenda for the

Future (pp. 131-157). Washington, DC: APA Books.

The Psychology of Juries received the American Psychology-Law Society 2018 Book Award; the

award is given annually “to a scholarly book devoted to psychology and law issues to recognize

outstanding scholarship in psychology and law.”

Helm, R. K., Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2017). Trial by numbers. Cornell Journal of Law and Public

Policy, 27, 107-143. Available at: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/JLPP/upload/Helm-

et-al-final.pdf.

Robbennolt, J., & Hans, V. P. (2017). Tort law and commonsense justice: Convergence and divergence.

Court Review, 53, 110-115. Available at: http://aja.ncsc.dni.us/publications/courtrv/cr53-

3/CR53-3Robbennolt.pdf.

- 6 - Feller, T., Gastil, J., & Hans, V. P. (2016, Summer). The civic impact of civil jury service. Voir Dire, 23,

24-26.

Revised version appeared as Tracy Feller, John Gastil, and Valerie P. Hans, The democratic

virtue of civil jury service, in Civil Jury Project Newsletter, May 2017, Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 3-4.

Hans, V. P. (2016). El veredicto general del jurado: United States vs. Spock, 416 F. 2d 165 (1969). In A.

M. Binder & A. Harfuch (Eds.), El juicio por jurados en la jurisprudencia nacional e internacional

Sentencias comentadas y opiniones académicas del common law, del civil law y de la Corte

Europea de Derechos Humanos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ad Hoc Publishers [in Spanish].

Hans, V. P., & Jolivet, A. (2016). Iron fist in a velvet glove? Judicial behavior in mixed courts. In G. B.

Ramello & T. Eisenberg (Eds.), Research Handbook in Comparative Law and Economics (pp.

182-205). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hans, V. P., & Robbennolt, J. K. (2016). Causation in the courtroom. Trial, 52, 28-33.

Howe, J., Waites, R., & Hans, V. P. (2016, Spring). What psychology teaches us about juror decision

making—Tell stories and talk about damages. New York State Bar Association Commercial and

Federal Litigation Section Newsletter, 22(1), 3-5.

Jimeno-Bulnes, M., & Hans, V. P. (2016). Legal interpreter for the jury: The role of the Clerk of the

Court in Spain. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 6, 197-215. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2784185.

Marder, N. S., & Hans, V. P. (2016). Introduction to Juries and Mixed Tribunals across the Globe: New

Developments, Common Challenges and Future Directions. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 6,

163-178. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2785708.

Robbennolt, J. K., & Hans, V. P. (2016). The psychology of tort law. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein

(Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 249-274). NY: Springer.

Hans, V. P., Blume, J. H., Eisenberg, T., Hritz, A. C., Johnson, S. L., Royer, C. E., & Wells, M. T.

(2015). The death penalty: Should the judge or the jury decide who dies? Journal of Empirical

Legal Studies, 12, 70-99.

Marder, N. S., & Hans, V. P. (2015). Introduction to Juries and Lay Participation: American Perspectives

and Global Trends. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 90, 789-824.

Reyna, V., Hans, V. P., Corbin, J., Yeh, R., Kim, K. & Royer, C. (2015). The gist of juries: Testing a

model of damage award decision making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 280-294. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000048

Hans, V. P. (2014). Judging lay judges: What is the fact finding ability of the jury? AmerikaHo, 2014 (1),

1-12 (in Japanese).

Hans, V. P. (2014). Reflections on Ted Eisenberg. Cornell Law Review, 100, 4-8.

Hans, V. P. (2014). Reflections on the Korean jury trial. Journal of Korean Law, 14, 81-115.

Hans, V. P. (2014). The impact of victim participation in Saiban-in trials in Japan: Insights from the

American jury experience. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 42, 103-116.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.07.02

- 7 - Hans, V. P. (2014). What’s it worth? Jury damage awards as community judgments. William & Mary

Law Review, 55, 935-969.

Hans, V. P., Gastil, J., & Feller, T. (2014). Deliberative democracy and the American civil jury. Journal

of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 697-717.

Royer, C. E., Hritz, A. C., Hans, V. P., Eisenberg, T., Wells, M. T., Blume, J. H., & Johnson, S. L.

(2014). Victim gender and the death penalty. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review,

82, 429-464.

Goldbach, T. & Hans, V. P. (2014). Juries, lay judges and trials. In Gerben Bruinsma & David Weisburd

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 2716-2727). NY: Springer.

Hans, V. P. (2013). Canadian jury research: The contributions of Anthony N. Doob. Canadian Journal of

Criminology and Criminal Justice/Revue canadienne de crimonologie et de justice pénale, 55,

533-548. doi: 10.3138/cjccj.2012.ES07.

Hans, V. P. (2013). Jury jokes. DePaul Law Review, 62, 391-413.

Fukurai, H., & Hans, V. P. (2012). Introduction: The future of lay adjudication in Korea and Japan

(editors’ introduction). Yonsei Law Journal, 3, 25-35.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Jan. 20). Jury Representativeness: It’s No Joke in the State of New York, Cornell

Journal of Law & Public Policy Blog.

Hans, V. P. (2012). What difference does a jury make? Yonsei Law Journal, 3, 36-54.

Spanish translation appeared in: Hans, V. P., & Gastil, J. (Eds.). (2014). El juicio por jurados:

Investigaciones sobre la deliberacíon, el veredicto y la democracia (pp. 21-45). Buenos Aires,

Argentina: Ad Hoc.

Hans, V. P. and other participants (2012, Mar. 1). Lay citizens and legal decision making around the

world: Insights for Taiwan’s proposed system. Taiwan Law Journal, 195, 1 & ff. (in Chinese &

English).

Johnson, S.L., Blume, J., Eisenberg, T., Hans, V.P. & Wells, M. T. (2012). The Delaware death penalty:

An empirical study. Iowa Law Review, 97, 1925-1964.

Hans, V. P., Rachlinski, J. J., & Owens, E. G. (2011). Editors’ introduction to Judgment by the Numbers:

Converting Qualitative to Quantitative Judgments in Law. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8,

1-5.

Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2011). To dollars from sense: Qualitative to quantitative translation in jury

damage awards. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 120-147.

Cornwell, E., & Hans, V.P. (2011). Representation through participation: A multilevel analysis of jury

deliberations. Law & Society Review, 45, 667-698.

Spanish translation appeared in: Hans, V. P., & Gastil, J. (Eds.). (2014). El juicio por jurados:

Investigaciones sobre la deliberacíon, el veredicto y la democracia (pp. 81-125). Buenos Aires,

Argentina: Ad Hoc.

Hans, V.P., & Germain, C. (2011). The French jury at a crossroads. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 737-

768.

Hans, V.P., & Eisenberg, T. (2011). The predictability of juries. DePaul Law Review, 60, 375-396.

- 8 -

Hans, V.P., Kaye, D.H., Dann, B.M., Farley, E.J., & Albertson, S. (2011). Science in the jury box: Jurors’

comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 60-71.

Corey, Z., & Hans, V. P. (2010). Japan’s new lay judge system: Deliberative democracy in action? Asian-

Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 12, 72-94.

Eisenberg, T., & Hans, V. P. (2009). Taking a stand on taking the stand: The effect of a prior criminal

record on the decision to testify and on trial outcomes. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1353-1390.

Short summary version appeared in September 2009 in The Legal Workshop,

http://legalworkshop.org/. Direct link: http://legalworkshop.org/2009/09/14/taking-a-stand-on-

taking-the-stand-the-effect-of-a-prior-criminal-record-on-the-decision-to-testify-and-on-trial-

outcomes.

Hans, V. P. (2009). What difference do juries make? In K.-C. Huang (Ed.), Empirical Studies of Judicial

Systems 2008 (pp. 105-148). Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China: Institutum Jurisprudentiae,

Academia Sinica.

Waters, N., & Hans, V. P. (2009). A jury of one: Opinion formation, conformity, and dissent on juries.

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6, 513-540.

Spanish translation appeared in: Hans, V. P., & Gastil, J. (Eds.). (2014). El juicio por jurados:

Investigaciones sobre la deliberacíon, el veredicto y la democracia (pp. 47-80). Buenos Aires,

Argentina: Ad Hoc.

Hans, V. P. and others. (2009). Lay participation [Roundtable discussion]. Taiwan Law Journal, 127, 137-

156; and Taiwan Law Journal, 128, 155-168. [in English and Chinese]

Hans, V. P. (2009). Juries as conduits for culture. In D. M. Engel & M. McCann (Eds.), Fault lines: Tort

law and cultural practice (pp. 80-96). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hans, V. P. (2008). Empowering the active jury: A genuine tort reform. Rogers Williams University Law

Review, 13, 39-72.

Hans, V. P. (2008). Faking it? Citizen perceptions of whiplash injuries. In B. H. Bornstein, R. L. Wiener,

R. Schopp & S. Willborn (Eds.), Civil juries and civil justice: Psychological and legal

perspectives (pp. 131-150). NY: Springer.

Hans, V. P. (2008). Jury systems around the world. Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 4, 275-297.

Hans, V. P. (2008, Spring). Science on trial. Cornell Forum, 34, 4-10.

Hans, V. P., & Fujita, M. (2008). How citizens make legal decisions, and how lawyers can help them.

Quarterly Keiji-Bengo [Japanese Quarterly for Criminal Defense Lawyers], 56, 108-114. [in

Japanese]

Cass, A., & Hans, V. P. (2007). Psychological analysis of juries, in D. S. Clark (Ed.), Encyclopedia of

law and society: American and global perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Eisenberg, T., Hans, V. P., & Wells, M. T. (2007). The relation between punitive and compensatory

awards: Combining extreme data with the mass of awards. In Brian H. Bornstein, Richard L.

Wiener, Robert Schopp & Steven Willborn (Eds.), Civil juries and civil justice: Psychological

and legal perspectives (pp. 105-115). NY: Springer.

- 9 - Hans, V. P. (2007). Judges, juries, and scientific evidence. Journal of Law & Policy, 16, 19-46.

Hans, V. P. (2007). Deliberation and dissent: 12 Angry Men versus the empirical reality of juries.

Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 579-589.

Hans, V. P. (2007). Introduction: Citizens as legal decision makers: An international perspective. Cornell

International Law Journal, 40, 303-314.

Kaye, D. H., Hans, V. P., Dann, B. M., Farley, E. & Albertson, S. (2007). Statistics in the jury box: How

jurors respond to mitochondrial DNA match probabilities. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4,

797-834.

Dann, B. M., Hans, V. P., & Kaye, D. H. (2006). Can jury trial innovations improve juror understanding

of DNA evidence? National Institute of Justice Journal, 255, 2-6.

Reprinted in 40 The Prosecutor 20 (November/December 2006).

Revised version published in Judicature, 90, 152-156 (2007).

Reprinted in 31 Champion 26 (April, 2007).

Hans, V. P. (2006). Introduction: Issues in contemporary jury scholarship. In Hans, V. P. (Ed.), The jury

system: Contemporary scholarship. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Hans, V. P. (2006). The twenty-first century jury: Worst of times or best of times? Criminal Law Brief, 1,

3-8.

Hans, V. P. (2006). Jury research ethics and the integrity of jury deliberations. In J. Kleinig & J. P. Levine

(Eds.), Jury ethics: Juror conduct and jury dynamics (pp. 247-264). Herndon, VA: Paradigm

Publishers.

Hans, V.P., Dann, B.M., Kaye, D.H., Farley, E., & Albertson, S. (2005). Testing jury reforms. Delaware

Lawyer, 23, 34-36.

Hans, V. P. (2005). Jury bias is a special problem in high profile trials. Insights on Law & Society

(American Bar Association/Division for Public Education), 5, 15, 18.

Eisenberg, T., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Mott, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., Schwab, S. J., &

Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven &

Zeisel’s The American Jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2, 171-206.

Albertson, S., Farley, E., & Hans, V. P. (2004). Jury decision making, in Charles Spielberger (Ed.),

Encyclopedia of applied psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 485-495). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

Antonio, M. E., Fleury-Steiner, B. D., Hans, V. P., & Bowers, W. J. (2004). Capital jurors as the litmus

test of community conscience for the juvenile death penalty. Judicature, 87, 274-283.

Bowers, W. J., Fleury-Steiner, B., Hans, V. P., & Antonio, M. E. (2004). Too young to be executed: An

empirical examination of community conscience and the juvenile death penalty from the perspective

of capital jurors. Boston University Law Review, 84, 609-693.

Dann, B. M., & Hans, V. P. (2004). Recent evaluative research on jury trial innovations. Court Review,

41, 12-19.

Garvey, S. P., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Mott, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., & Wells, M. T.

(2004). Juror first votes in criminal trials. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1, 371-398.

- 10 -

Brief version published as: Wells, M. T., Garvey, S. P., Hannaford-Agor, P., Hans, V. P., Mott,

N. L., & Munsterman, G. T. (2006). Evidence, police credibility, and race affect juror first votes

(ILR Impact Brief #11). Ithaca, NY: School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell

University. Available at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/briefs/20/.

Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (2004). Jurors and juries. In A. Sarat (Ed.), Blackwell companion to law and

society (pp. 195-211). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Hannaford-Agor, P. L., & Hans, V. P. (2003). Nullification at work? A glimpse from the National Center

for State Courts study of hung juries. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78, 1249-1277.

Hans, V. P. (2003). Lay participation in legal decision making: Introduction to the special issue. Law &

Policy, 25, 83-92.

Hans, V. P., & Albertson, S. (2003). Empirical research and civil jury reform. Notre Dame Law Review,

78, 1497-1523.

Hans, V. P., & Dee, J. (2003). Whiplash: Who’s to blame? Brooklyn Law Review, 68, 1093-1120.

Excerpted in David R. Papke, et al., Law and popular culture: Text, notes, and questions (pp. 316-

318). LexisNexis (2007).

To be reprinted in Defense Law Journal.

Hans, V. P., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Mott, N. L., & Munsterman, G. T. (2003). The hung jury: The

American Jury’s insights and contemporary understanding. Criminal Law Bulletin, 39, 33-50.

Reprinted in V. P. Hans (Ed.), The jury system: Contemporary scholarship. Hampshire, England:

Ashgate Publishing Ltd. (2006).

Hans, V. P., & Jehle, A. (2003). Avoid bald men and people with green socks? Other ways to improve the

voir dire process in jury selection. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78, 1179-1201.

Abridged version reprinted in Civil Justice Digest, vol. 8, Nos. 1-2 (Winter/Spring 2003).

Kutnjak Ivkovic, S., & Hans, V. P. (2003). Jurors' evaluations of expert testimony: Judging the messenger

and the message. Law and Social Inquiry, 28, 441-482.

Reprinted in V. P. Hans (Ed.), The jury system: Contemporary scholarship. Hampshire, England:

Ashgate Publishing Ltd. (2006).

Sicuranza, E. F., Hans, V. P., Kral, K. K., & Watson, G. H. (2003). Using PBL in a WebCT faculty-

development session. In D. G. Brown (Ed.), Developing faculty to use technology (pp. 240-244).

Bolton, MA: Anker Publishers.

Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., & Munsterman, G. T. (2002). “Speaking rights”: Evaluating juror

discussions during civil trials. Judicature, 85, 237-243.

Hans, V. P. (2002). Jury selection (voir dire). In B. Kritzer (Ed.), Legal systems of the world: A political,

social, and cultural encyclopedia, Vol. II (pp. 803-805). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

Hans, V. P. (2002). U.S. jury reform: The active jury and the adversarial ideal. St. Louis University

Public Law Review, 21, 85-97.

- 11 - Antonio, M. E., & Hans, V. P. (2001). Race and the civil jury: How does a juror's race shape the jury

experience? In R. Roesch, R. R. Corrado & R. J. Dempster (Eds.), Psychology in the courts:

International advances in knowledge (69-81). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

Hans, V. P. (2001). Inside the black box: Comment on Diamond and Vidmar. Virginia Law Review, 87,

1917-1932.

Hans, V. P. (2001). The power of twelve: The impact of jury size and unanimity on civil jury decision

making, Delaware Law Review, 4, 1-31.

Hans, V. P. (2001). Integrating active learning and the use of technology in legal studies courses. In B. J.

Duch, S. E. Groh & D. E. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 141-148).

Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Hans, V. P., and others (2001). Corporate citizenship: A conversation among the law, business and

academia. Marquette Law Review, 84, 723-810. [revised transcript of conference proceedings,

including my speech, at Marquette University Law School Corporate Citizenship Conference,

September 15, 2000].

McCorkel, J, Schmitt, F. E., & Hans, V. P. (2001). Gender, law, and justice. In J. Sanders & V. L.

Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 301-341). NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum

Publishers.

Hans, V. P. (2000). Juries. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology. Washington, DC:

American Psychological Association/Oxford University Press.

Hannaford, P. L., Hans, V. P., & Munsterman, G. T. (2000). Permitting jury discussions during trial:

Impact of the Arizona reform. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 359-382.

Reprinted in Ronald Roesch & Nathalie Gagnon (Eds.) (2007). Psychology and law: Criminal and

civil perspectives (pp. 295-319). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.

Hannaford, P. L., Hans, V. P., Mott, N. L., & Munsterman, G. T. (2000). The timing of opinion formation

by jurors in civil cases: An empirical examination. Tennessee Law Review, 67, 627-652.

Hans, V. P. (2000, July). What jurors think about connective tissue injuries. Trial, pp. 18-26.

Hans, V. P., & Schmitt, F. E. (2000). Legal training. In N. Rafter (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and

crime (pp. 147-148). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.

Hans, V. P., & Vadino, N. (2000). Public attitudes toward mental disorders. In C. D. Bryant (Editor-in-

Chief), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Delinquent Behavior (Vol. 4) (pp. 406-408). Philadelphia,

PA: Brunner-Routledge.

Hans, V. P., & Vadino, N. (2000). Whipped by whiplash? The challenges of jury communication in

connective tissue injury lawsuits. Tennessee Law Review, 67, 569-586.

*Reprinted in Trial Lawyers Quarterly (2001).

*Reprinted in Defense Law Journal (2001, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 589-609).

Mott, N. L., Hans, V. P., & Simpson, L. (2000). What’s half a lung worth? Civil jurors’ accounts of their

award decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 401-419.

*Featured as Highlighted Article in Court Call (Fall, 2000).

- 12 -

Vidmar, N., et al. (2000). Amicus brief: Kumho Tire v. Carmichael. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 387-

400. [Publication of amicus brief submitted to U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of respondents in

Kumho Tire, 10/18/98].

Fulero, S. F., Greene, E., Hans, V. P., Nietzel, M. T., Small, M. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999).

Undergraduate education in legal psychology. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 137-153.

Hannaford, P. L., Hans, V. P., & Munsterman, G. T. (1999). How much justice hangs in the balance? A

new look at hung jury rates. Judicature, 83, 59-67.

Hans, V. P. (1999, Fall). Plea bargaining: Active learning in a course on the courts. About Teaching

[online publication]. Newark, DE: Center for Teaching Effectiveness and the University of

Delaware. [description of the assignment may be found at

http://cte.udel.edu/sites/udel.edu.cte/files/aboutteach/fall99/hans.html; original assignment was

available online at http://www.udel.edu/cte/aboutteach/fall99/hans.html]

Hans, V. P., & Appel, A. I. (1999). The jury on trial. In W.F. Abbott & J. Batt, Handbook of jury research

(pp. 3-1 to 3-23). Philadelphia, PA: American Law Institute-American Bar Association.

Hans, V. P., Munsterman, G. T., & Hannaford, P. L. (1999). The Arizona jury reform permitting civil

jury trial discussions: The views of trial participants, judges, and jurors. University of Michigan

Journal of Law Reform, 32, 349-377.

Hans, V. P. (1998). Illusions and realities in jurors’ treatment of corporate defendants. DePaul Law

Review, 48, 327-353.

Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V. P., & Lawrence, S. (1998). The concept of boundaries in the

practices and products of sociolegal research: An introduction. In A. Sarat, M. Constable, D. Engel,

V. P. Hans & S. Lawrence (Eds.), Crossing boundaries: Traditions and transformations in law and

society research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Hans, V. P. (1998, Winter). The jury under attack. Voir Dire, 5, 4-6, 25.

Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., & Lawrence, S. (1998). Ideas of the “everyday” and the

“breach” in law and society scholarship: An introduction. Pp. 1-13 in A. Sarat, M. Constable, D.

Engel, V. Hans & S. Lawrence (Eds.), Everyday practices and trouble cases. Evanston, IL:

Northwestern University Press.

Bersoff, D. N., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Grisso, J. T., Hans, V. P., Poythress, N. G., Jr., & Roesch, R. G.

(1997). Training in law and psychology: Models from the Villanova Conference. American

Psychologist, 52, 1301-1310.

Hans, V.P., & Casper, J. (1997). Trial by jury and the legitimacy of the courts. In L. M. Friedman &

G. Fisher (Eds.) The crime conundrum: Essays on criminal justice (pp. 93-106). Boulder, CO:

Westview Press.

Hans, V. P. (1996). The contested role of the civil jury in business litigation. Judicature, 79, 242-248.

Hans, V.P. (1995). How juries decide death: The contributions of the Capital Jury Project. Indiana Law

Journal, 70, 1233-1240.

Hans, V. P. (1994, June 6). Robin Hood myth challenged. National Law Journal, pp. C1, C6, C8.

- 13 - Hans, V. P., & Ivkovich, S. K. (1994, Summer). Jurors and experts. Advocate, 16, 16-21.

*Listed as an article of special interest in the Association of Trial Lawyers of America Law

Reporter, September 1994.

* Reprinted in Forum, 28, No. 2 (1994).

Hans, V. P., & Lofquist, W. S. (1994). Perceptions of civil justice: The litigation crisis attitudes of

civil jurors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 181-196.

Hans, V. P., & Martinez, R., Jr. (1994). Intersections of race, ethnicity, and the law. Law and Human

Behavior, 18, 211-221.

Hans, V. P. (1993). Attitudes toward the civil jury: A crisis of confidence? In Robert E. Litan (Ed.),

Verdict: Assessing the civil jury system (pp. 248-281). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

Hans, V. P., & Sweigart, K. (1993). Jurors' views of civil lawyers: Implications for courtroom

communication. Indiana Law Journal, 68, 1297-1332.

Reprinted in Defense Law Journal, 43, 121-160 (1994).

Reprinted in Voices from criminal justice: Insider perspectives, outsider experiences.

New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group (2017). Second Edition.

Hans, V. P. (1992). Expanding psycholegal inquiry: The analysis of attitudes toward corporate

responsibility. In J. R. P. Ogloff (Ed.), Psychology and law: The broadening of the discipline, (pp.

355-379). Carolina Academic Press.

Hans, V. P. (1992). Jury decision making. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of

psychology and law (pp. 56-76). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Hans, V. P., & Lofquist, W. S. (1992). Jurors' judgments of business liability in tort cases: Implications

for the litigation explosion debate. Law and Society Review, 26, 85-115.

Reprinted in edited form in A. Sarat (Ed.), The social organization of law: Introductory readings

(123-129). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company (2004).

Hans, V. P., & Dee, J. L. (1991). Media coverage of law: Its impact on juries and the public. American

Behavioral Scientist, 35, 136-149.

Reprinted in H. Machado (Ed.), Justice, media and citizenship (in Portuguese).

Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1991). The American Jury at twenty-five years. Law and Social Inquiry, 16,

323-351.

Cecil, J. S., Hans, V. P., & Wiggins, E. C. (1991). Citizen comprehension of difficult issues: Lessons

from civil jury trials. American University Law Review, 40, 727-774.

Roesch, R., Golding, S. L., Hans, V. P., & Repucci, N. D. (1991). Social science and the courts: The role

of amicus curiae briefs. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 1-11.

Reprinted in Ronald Roesch & Nathalie Gagnon (Eds.) (2007). Psychology and law: Criminal and

civil perspectives (pp. 471-482). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.

- 14 - Hans, V. P. (1990). Attitudes toward corporate responsibility: A psycholegal perspective. Nebraska Law

Review, 69, 158-189.

Hans, V. P. (1990). Law and the media: An overview and introduction. Law and Human Behavior, 14,

399-407.

Hans, V. P. (1989). The jury's response to business and corporate wrongdoing. Law and Contemporary

Problems, 52, 177-203.

Reprinted in R. M. Krivoshey (Ed.), Readings in trial advocacy and the social sciences, Vol. 3:

Presentation of evidence to juries (pp. 101-127). New York: Garland Publishing Inc. (1994).

Hans, V. P., & Ermann, M. D. (1989). Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing. Law and

Human Behavior, 13, 151-166.

Hans, V. P. (1989). Psychology and the law. In W. L. Gregory & J. Burroughs (Eds.), Introduction to

applied psychology (pp. 327-368). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.

Hans, V. P. (1988). Death by jury. In K. C. Haas & J. A. Inciardi (Eds.), Challenging capital

punishment: Legal and social science approaches (pp. 149-175). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Publications.

Hans, V. P. (1986). An analysis of public attitudes toward the insanity defense. Criminology, 24,

393-414.

*Cited in Matter of Commitment of Edward S., 570 A.2d 917 (N.J. 1990); Aizupitis v. State,

Supreme Court of Delaware (decided July 22, 1997).

Hans V. P. (1986). The conduct of voir dire: A psychological analysis. Justice System Journal, 11, 40-58.

* Reprinted in R. M. Krivoshey (Ed.), Readings in trial advocacy and the social sciences, Vol. 1:

Juries: Formation and behavior (pp. 406-424). NY: Garland Publishing Inc. (1994).

Hans, V. P. (1985). The jury's political role: "To see with their own eyes." Delaware Lawyer, 4, 20,

22-25.

Hans, V. P., & Eisenberg, N. (1985). The effects of sex-role attitudes and group composition on men and

women in groups. Sex Roles, 12, 477-490.

Hoffman, B. F., & Hans, V. P. (1985). A survey of interdisciplinary differences in attitudes and morale

within a psychiatric hospital. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 12, 23-27.

Hans, V. P., & Slater, D. (1984). "Plain crazy:" Lay definitions of legal insanity. International Journal of

Law and Psychiatry, 7, 105-114.

Slater, D., & Hans, V. P. (1984). Public opinion of forensic psychiatry following the Hinckley verdict.

American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 675-679.

Hans, V. P., & Slater, D. (1983). John Hinckley, Jr. and the insanity defense: The public's verdict. Public

Opinion Quarterly, 47, 202-212.

Slater, D., & Hans, V. P. (1983). Cameras in the courts: Can we trust the research? Delaware Lawyer, 2,

56-58.

- 15 - Hans, V. P. (1982). Jury selection in two countries: A psychological perspective. Current Psychological

Reviews, 2, 283-300.

Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1982). Jury selection. In N. L. Kerr and R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology

of the courtroom (pp. 39-82). New York: Academic Press.

*Excerpted in R. H. Field, B. Kaplan & K. Clermont (Eds.) (1990). Materials for a basic course in

civil procedure, 6th ed. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press [and later editions].

Slater, D., & Hans, V. P. (1982). Methodological issues in the evaluation of "experiments" with cameras

in the courts. Communication Quarterly, 30, 376-380.

Hans, V. P. (1981). Evaluating the jury: The uses of research in policy formation. In R. Roesch & R.

Corrado (Eds.), Evaluation and criminal justice policy (pp. 143-157). Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage.

Hans, V. P. (1979). The unanimity requirement: Issues and evidence. A report to the Law Reform

Commission of Canada, 1977. In Studies on the jury (pp. 141-179). Ottawa: Law Reform

Commission of Canada.

Hans, V. P. (l979). The effects of the unanimity requirement on ratings of jury deliberations. A report to

the Law Reform Commission of Canada, 1978. In Studies on the jury (pp. 183-211). Ottawa: Law

Reform Commission of Canada.

Hans, V. P., & Brooks, N. (1977). The effects of corroboration instructions in a rape case on

experimental juries. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 15, 701-716.

Doob, A. N., & Hans, V. P. (1977). Two experiments dealing with the acceptability to the public of

verdicts of juries and judges. A report to the Law Reform Commission of Canada. Ottawa: Law

Reform Commission of Canada.

Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the deliberations of

simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235-253.

*Reprinted in W. D. Loh (1984), Social research in the judicial process: Cases, readings, and text

(pp. 512-514). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

*Cited in People v. Allen, 420 N.W. 2d 499 (Mich. 1988); State v. Burton, 676 P. 2d 975 (Wash.

1984) (dissenting opinion).

Book Reviews

Hans, V. P. (2014). Review of McCammon, The U.S. women's jury movements and strategic adaptation:

A more just verdict. Contemporary Sociology, 43, 557-558. DOI: 10.1177/0094306114539455jj.

Available at: http://csx.sagepub.com/content/43/4/557.

Hans, V.P. (1997). Who’s to blame? [Review of Robinson and Darley, Justice, liability, and blame:

Community views and the criminal law]. Contemporary Psychology, 42, 111-112.

Hans, V. P. (1995). Review of Constable, The law of the other: Changing conceptions of citizenship, law,

and knowledge. Contemporary Sociology, 24, 662-663.

Hans, V. P. (1992). Feature review: Judgments of justice. [Review of Lind and Tyler, The social

psychology of procedural justice; Tyler, Why people obey the law; and Kelman and Hamilton,

Crimes of obedience]. Psychological Science, 3, 218-221.

- 16 -

Hans, V. P. (1990). Internationalizing psychology and law. [Review of Wegener, Losel & Haisch (Eds.),

Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives]. Contemporary Psychology,

35, 859-860.

Hans, V. P. (1989, July 21). Expert witnessing. [Review of Chesler, Sanders & Kalmuss, Social science

in court.] Science, 245, 312-313.

Hans, V. P. (1987). Psychology in court. [Review of Nietzel & Dillehay, Psychological consultation in

the courtroom.] Contemporary Psychology, 32, 1000-1002.

Hans, V. P. (1987). Judicial meat and potatoes. [Review of Kassin & Wrightsman, The psychology of

evidence and trial procedure.] Contemporary Psychology, 32, 56-57.

Hans, V. P. (1987). [Review of Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, Inside the jury.] Justice Quarterly, 4,

325-327.

Published Teaching Materials

Please note that in 2015, the PBL Clearinghouse moved to open access Google.docs.

Allen, D., Duch, B., & Hans, V. (2002). Writing effective problem-based materials. Workshop published

online in Problem-Based Learning Clearinghouse

[Available at: https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/getPage?id=/78245023770/article.html].

Duke, B., Hans, V., Groh, S., Watson, G., & White, H. (2002). Experience it yourself: A model for

active/problem-based learning for all classes. Workshop published online in Problem-Based

Clearinghouse [Available at:

https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/getPage?id=/78245023770/article.html].

Hans, V. P. (2002). Social sciences workshop, in PBL2002 Preconference Workshops: PBL from

disciplinary perspectives. Workshop published online in Problem-Based Learning Clearinghouse

[Available at: https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/viewIndex.jsp?id=78390549842].

Hans, V. P. (1999, Fall). Plea bargaining: Active learning in a course on the courts. About Teaching.

Newark, DE: Center for Teaching Effectiveness and the University of Delaware.

[Available at: http://www.udel.edu/cte/aboutteach/fall99/hans.html]

Lieux, E. M., Allen, D. & Hans, V. P. (2001). DNA for dinner. PBL problem, peer reviewed and

published online in Problem-Based Learning Clearinghouse.

[Available at: https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/viewIndex.jsp?id=24069118568].

Sicuranza, E., Hans, V. P., Kral, K. & Watson, G. (2002). Using PBL in a WebCT faculty development

session. Article peer reviewed and published online in Problem-Based Learning Clearinghouse

[Available at: https://www.mis4.udel.edu/Pbl/viewIndex.jsp?id=73989299595].

COLLOQUIA, LECTURES, AND PRESENTATIONS AT PROFESSIONAL CONFERENCES (since 2008)

Hans, V. P. (2019, June 1). Law, society, and psychological science in action. Chair, paper session

presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.

- 17 - Hans, V. P. (2019, June 1). The rise and fall of citizen participation in legal decision making. Organizer

and Chair, Roundtable discussion at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association,

Washington, DC.

Diamond, S. S., & Hans, V. P. (2019, May 31). Gender on the Argentine jury. Paper presented at the

annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.

Hans, V. P. (2019, May 16). Análisis del sistema de juicio por jurados Neuquino [Analysis of the system

of trial by jury in Neuquén]. Presented at Congreso Internatcional de Juicio por Jurados, Villa La

Angostura, Neuquén, Argentina.

Hans, V. P., Garavito, D., Helm, R. K., Reed, K., & Reyna, V F. (2019, April 24). Guiding jurors in

damage award decision making. Presentation at the Civil Jury Academic Roundtable, Civil Jury

Project at NYU Law School, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2019, April 18). Faculty speaker, Class dinner for the class of 2019 J.D. students. Cornell

Law Library, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2019, March 27). El jurado clásico y el poder de la deliberación [The classic jury and the

power of deliberation]. Presented at IV Congreso Internacional de Juicio por Juradoes: El jurado

en América Latina [4th International Congress on Jury Trial: The Jury in Latin America]. Centro

de Congresos y Exposiciones Dr. Emilio Civit, City of Mendoza, Argentina.

Hans, V. P., Porterie, S., & Romano, A. (2019, March 27). Sistema de juicio por jurado en Argentina

[Jury trial systems in Argentina]. Presented at IV Congreso Internacional de Juicio por Juradoes:

El jurado en América Latina [4th International Congress on Jury Trial: The Jury in Latin

America]. Centro de Congresos y Exposiciones Dr. Emilio Civit, City of Mendoza, Argentina.

Hritz, A. C., Royer, C. E., & Hans, V. P. (2019, March 14). Diminishing support for the death penalty:

Implications for fair capital case outcomes. Presentation at the meeting of the American

Psychology-Law Society, Portland, OR.

Reed, K., Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2019, Feb. 8). Accounting for awards. Driven by Data

symposium, University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Denver, CO.

Cardi, J., Hans, V. P., & Parks, G. (2018, Nov. 9). Implicit racial bias and tort case decisions. Conference

on Empirical Legal Studies, University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Hans, V. P., & Robbennolt, J. K. (2018, October 9). Psychology and torts. Keynote address. Trial

Advocacy Seminar: Jurors Live: Pulling the Curtain Back. Minneapolis, MN.

Hannaford-Agor, P., & Hans, V. P. (2018, August 7). Juicio por jurados [Trial by jury]. Mendoza,

Argentina.

Hannaford-Agor, P., & Hans, V. P. (2018, August 6). Juicio por jurados [Trial by jury]. La Plata,

Argentina.

Hans, V. P., Porterie, S., & Romano, A. (2018, August 2). Juicio por jurados en Neuquén [Trial by jury in

Neuquén]. Neuquén., Argentina.

Cardi, J., Hans, V. P., & Parks, G. (2018, June 27). Litigant race, implicit racial bias, and tort case

decisions. Faculty Workshop, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

- 18 - Hans, V. P. (2018, June 8). Undergraduate legal studies: The concept, the association, and the field.

Participant, Professional development panel, presented at the joint meeting of the Law and

Society Association/Canadian Law and Society Association, Toronto, ONT, Canada.

Hans, V. P., Porterie, S., & Romano Bordagaray, A. (2018, June 8). A new jury system at work: Data

from jurors, judges, and lawyers in Neuquén, Argentina. Paper presented at the joint meeting of

the Law and Society Association/Canadian Law and Society Association, Toronto, ONT, Canada.

Hans, V. P., (2018, June 7). Chair/discussant, Cutting Edge Jury Research. Paper session presented at the

joint meeting of the Law and Society Association/Canadian Law and Society Association,

Toronto, ONT, Canada.

Kutnjak Ivkovich, S., & Hans, V. P. (2018, June 7). A worldwide perspective on lay participation. Paper

presented at the joint meeting of the Law and Society Association/Canadian Law and Society

Association, Toronto, ONT, Canada.

Hans, V. P. (2018, June 7). Chair/discussant, New Comparative Lay Participation Research. Paper session

presented at the joint meeting of the Law and Society Association/Canadian Law and Society

Association, Toronto, ONT, Canada.

Hans, V. P. (2018, June 1). Recent research on damages. Presentation at the 37th annual meeting of the

American Society of Trial Consultants, Fort Worth, TX.

Hans, V. P., Helm, R. K., & Reyna, V. F. (2018, April 12). From injury to dollars. Paper presented at

Criser Lecture Series Workshop, Fredric G. Levin College of Law, University of Florida,

Gainesville, FL.

Helm, R. K., Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2018, March 10). Numeracy in the jury box. Paper presented at

the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Memphis, TN.

Hans, V. P. (2018, Feb. 26). A psychological perspective on tort law. Inaugural lecture, Master of Law

Program, EAFIT University, Medellín, Colombia.

Hans, V. P. (2018, January 30). From meaning to money. BEDR Showcase, Cornell University, Ithaca,

NY.

Hans, V. P. (2018, January). The scope and limitation of public participation in the criminal justice

system. Bangkok, Thailand.

Jan. 11, 2018: Judicial Training Institute

Jan. 15, 2018: Faculty of Law, Thammasart University

Jan. 17, 2018: Faculty of Law, Ramkhamhaeng University

Jan. 17, 2018: Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University

Hans, V. P. (2018, Jan. 12). Keynote address: Rule of law: Civic perspectives. TIJ Public Forum on the

Rule of Law and Sustainable Development, organized by the Thailand Institute of Justice. Dusit

Thani Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand.

Hans, V. P. (2017, Sept. 26). The role of scholarly organizations in sociolegal studies. Faculty workshop,

Wake Forest University School of Law.

Hans, V. P. (2017, July 20-21). Participant, American Academy of Arts and Sciences’ Daedalus Authors’

Workshop on Science & The Legal System, American Academy of Arts and Sciences,

Cambridge, MA.

- 19 - Hans, V. P. (2017, June 22). Chair, Evidence Disclosure in Japan. Panel presented at the International

Law and Society meeting, Mexico City, Mexico.

Hans, V. P. (2017, April 19). El impacto de los jurados [The impact of juries]. Ministerio de justicia y

derechos humanos, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (2017, April 18). Deliberación del jurado [Jury deliberation]. Presentatión para la clase de

juicio por jurados, Profesor Edmundo Hendler, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Buenos

Aires, Argentina.

Hans, V. P., (2017, April 17). ¿Por qué los jurados hacen la diferencia? [What difference do juries make?]

Jornada de Juicio por Jurados en Chubut, Museo Egidio Feruglio, Chubut, Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (2017, April 11). El jurado como un trasplante legal [The jury as a legal transplant]. Faculty

lecture, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Hans, V. P. (2017, April 10). Modelos de juicios por jurados: Ventajas y desventajas [Models of jury

trials: Advantages and disadvantages]. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad National de Córdoba.

Hans, V. P., Helm, R. K., & Reyna, V. F. (2017, Feb. 16). From injury to dollars: Views from the bench

and the bar. Faculty Enrichment Workshop, Florida State University College of Law, Tallahassee,

FL.

Hans, V. P., Helm, R. K., & Reyna, V. F. (2017, Feb. 2). Deciding on damage awards. Faculty Workshop,

Syracuse University College of Law, Syracuse, NY.

Hans, V. P., Helm, R. K., & Reyna, V. F. (2017, Jan. 30). Damage awards and the meaning of money.

Faculty workshop, Penn State Law, State College, PA.

Hans, V. P. (2017, Jan. 4). Panelist, How Social Science Can Improve Judicial Decisionmaking.

American Association of Law Schools conference, San Francisco, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2016, Dec. 13). Scientist participant (Seven minutes on jury research). Science Speed Dating

Event, National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Technology, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2016, Nov. 19). Discussant, paper by Judith Spirig, It’s in the news: The impact of asylum

issue salience on judicial decision making. Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Duke Law

School, Durham, NC.

Hans, V. P. (2016, Nov. 10). Symposium discussant. Dignity Takings/Dignity Restoration: A

Symposium. Chicago-Kent College of Law, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P. (2016, Oct. 28). A juror’s-eye view of jury service. Workshop presented to Delaware

Superior Court judges, Rehoboth Beach, DE.

Hans, V. P. (2016, Sept. 21). A primer on designing and planning law and society research. Asian Law

Institute Young Scholars’ Workshop, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Diamond, S. S., & Hans, V. P. (2016, June 23). Los jurados y la prueba [Juries and evidence]. Workshop,

Villa la Angostura, Neuquén, Argentina.

Diamond, S. S., & Hans, V. P. (2016, June 24). Instrucciones del jurado [Jury instructions]. Workshop,

Villa la Angostura, Neuquén, Argentina.

- 20 - Hans, V. P. (2016, June 27). ¿Por qué los jurados hacen la diferencia? [What difference does a jury

make?]. Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (2016, June 5). Roundtable, Psychology and law: Conceptual advancements to bridge the

disciplinary divide. Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Hans, V. P. (2016, June 4). Trial by jury: Story of a legal transplant. Presidential address, Law and

Society Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Hans, V. P. (2016, June 3). Discussant, Roundtable on Popular decision on the death penalty: Saiban-in

and death sentencing in Japan. Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Hans, V. P. (2016, May 13). The impact of juries. Keynote address, Stanford Program in Law and

Society, Third Conference for Junior Researchers, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2016, April 29). Juries’ perceptions of corporate litigants. Presentation at Roundtable,

Corporations as legal persons: Taking entity theory seriously. Cornell Club, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2016, various dates) From meaning to money: Translating injuries to dollars.

Feb. 9, 2016, Faculty workshop, Chicago-Kent School of Law, Chicago, IL.

Feb. 23, 2016, Law and Economics Workshop, University of Toronto Law School, Toronto,

Ontario, Canada.

March 3, 2016, Faculty workshop, Legal Studies & Business Ethics Department, Wharton

School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Hans, V. P. (2016, Jan. 27). Decision making about damages. Presentation to the Commercial and Federal

Practice Section, New York State Bar Association, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Dec. 16). Comments on Adi Leibivitch, Relative judgments. First SELS Global

Workshop for Junior Empirical-Legal Scholars, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Nov. 18). Remarks on the jury system. Steve Susman’s seminar on juries, NYU Law

School, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Oct. 30). Comments on Nicholas Scurich, Kenneth D. Nguyen and Richard S. John,

Jurors’ presumption of innocence: Impact on cumulative evidence evaluation and verdicts.

Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Oct. 13). The meaning of money: Juries and their damage awards. Sturm College of

Law, University of Denver, Denver, CO.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Sept. 28). Jury damage awards: To dollars from sense. Law and Society Speakers

Series, S.J. Quinney College of Law/Law & Society Association, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Aug. 5). The impact of jury service on citizens’ political participation: Data from the

United States. East Asian Law & Society Conference, Tokyo, Japan.

Jimeno-Bulnes, M., & Hans, V. P. (2015, May 29). The jury trial in Spain: the relevant role played by the

Clerk of the Court. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Seattle,

WA.

Robbennolt, J., & Hans, V. P. (2015, May 28). Psychology and tort law. Presentation at the annual

meeting of the Law & Society Association, Seattle, WA.

- 21 - Hans, V. P., & Harfuch, A. (2015, May 15). University education on trial by jury, the adversarial system

and empirical research about juries. Workshop, Third International Jury Congress, Neuquén,

Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (2015, May 14). 50 years of empirical research on juries. Third International Jury Congress,

Neuquén, Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (with others). (2015, Apr. 25). Convicted by law; acquitted by social science. Cornell

University Sesquicentennial Program.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Jan. 13). Dollars and sense: The psychology of tort damages. Talk at Law School,

Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Hans, V. P. (2015, Jan. 6). Damage awards. Talk at Law School, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Hans, V. P. (2014, Nov. 21). Roundtable discussion on jury trial (with others). II Congreso International

de Juicio por Jurados, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (2014, Nov. 19). What difference does a jury make? II Congreso International de Juicio por

Jurados, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Hans, V. P. (2014, November 8). Discussant, Chang et al., Pain and suffering damages in wrongful death

cases: An empirical study. Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Berkeley, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2014, October 10). The jury debate in Taiwan. Conference on Juries and Lay Participation:

American Perspectives and Global Trends, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P. (2014, September 9). Comments on proposals for lay participation in Taiwan. Judicial Yuan,

Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2014, September 9). Comments on proposals for lay participation in Taiwan. Roundtable

Discussion, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2014, September 6). Commentary on Huang & Lin, Civil Law & Common Law Standards of

Proof. Third International Conference on Empirical Studies of Judicial Systems, Academia

Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2014, August). Moderator/Commentator, panel on Realism about Judges, Doctrine, and

Power. New Legal Realism 10th Anniversary Conference, UC-Irvine Law School, Irvine, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2014, July 18). Reactions to the mock trial. Judges Academy, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2014, July 14). Trial by jury: A global perspective. Judges Academy, Taipei, Taiwan.

Jimeno Bulnes, M., & Hans, V. P. (2014, June 13). Legal interpreter for the jury: The role of the clerk of

the court in Spain. Paper presented at Workshop on Juries and Mixed Tribunals Across the Globe:

New Developments, Common Challenges and Future Directions. International Institute for the

Sociology of Law, Oñati, Spain.

Hans, V. P., Cardi, J., & Parks, G. (2014, May 29). Implicit racial bias and tort decisions. Paper presented

at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Minneapolis, MN.

- 22 - Hans, V. P. (2014, May 29). Organizer and chair, Roundtable: Fifty years of research on juries and lay

participation in law. Presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association,

Minneapolis, MN.

Hans, V. P. (2014, May 29). Discussant, New developments in Japan's Saiban-in system. Panel presented

at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Minneapolis, MN.

Hans, V. P. (2014, Apr. 12). Discussant, Lawyers in Society panel, 10th Cornell Law School Inter-

University Graduate Conference, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2014, Mar. 7). New directions in jury research. Office of the Public Defender, Continuing

Legal Education Program, Wilmington, DE.

Royer, C. E., Hritz, A. C., Hans, V. P., Eisenberg, T., Wells, M. T., Blume, J. H., & Johnson, S. L. (2014,

March). Victim gender and the death penalty. Poster presentation, American Psychology-Law

Society annual conference, New Orleans, LA.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Nov. 21). Judgment on the jury. Speech at the Austrian Society for Criminal Law and

Criminology (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Strafrecht und Kriminologie). Vienna, Austria.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Nov. 12). The American jury trial. Talk at Law School, University of Burgos, Burgos,

Spain.

Bulnes, M. J., & Hans, V. P. (Nov. 11, 2013). Jury systems. IE Law School, Madrid, Spain.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Nov. 5). Is it worse to kill a man or a woman? The answer from capital punishment

research. Presentation at Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law, Oñati, Spain.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Nov. 4). Deciding who dies: Judges versus juries in capital punishment decision

making. Talk to the Faculty of Law, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain.

Hans, V.P., Gastil, J., & Ferrer, T. (2013, October 26). Deliberative democracy and the American civil

jury. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Philadelphia, PA.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Sept.22). Judging lay judges: What is the fact-finding ability of the jury? Presentation,

Symposium on the Jury System, Conference of the Japanese American Society for Legal Studies

(Nichibei Ho Gakukai), Kanazawa, Japan.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Sept. 13). Why is killing a woman worse than killing a man? Female victims and the

death penalty. Colloquium given at Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, South Korea.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Sept. 11). The death penalty: Should the judge or the jury decide who dies?

Presentation at the Law School, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Sept. 9). Judges, juries, and the American death penalty. Presentation in Foreign

Authority Forum, Faculty of Law, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

Hans, V. P. (2013, June 1). Reader, Dan Simon’s book In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice

System, Author Meets Readers session at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association,

Boston, MA.

Dolidze, A. V., & Hans, V. P. (2013, May 30). Jury trial as legal translation: The case of the Republic of

Georgia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Boston, MA.

- 23 - Hans, V. P. (2013, May 30). Chair and discussant, New Directions in the Study of Lay Participation in

Law. Session at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Boston, MA.

Hans, V. P. (2013, May 30). Discussant, Japan and Civil Jury Trials: Possibilities, Pros, and Cons.

Session at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Boston, MA.

Hans, V. P., Reyna, V.F., Corbin, J., Royer, C., & Yeh, R. (2013, May 6). The meaning of money: Juries

and their damage awards. Cornell Law School & Tel Aviv Law School Joint Empirical Legal

Studies conference, Buchman Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Hans, V. P. (2013, March 23). Comparative empirical study of lay participation in legal decision making.

Presentation at 3rd East Asian Law & Society Association conference, Shanghai, China.

Hans, V. P. (2013, March 20). Empirical legal studies. Presentation at Law School, Hangzhou Normal

University, Hangzhou, China.

Hans, V. P. (2013, March). Discussant, panel on civil jury research, presented at the annual conference of

the American Psychology-Law Society, Portland, OR.

Hans, V. P. (2013, March 15). Global juries: A plan for research. Paper presented in the session, The

Future of Jury Research, annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Portland,

OR.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Feb. 22). Billion dollar question: How do juries decide on damage awards? Paper presented at the 2013 William & Mary Law Review Symposium: The civil jury as a political institution. Williamsburg, VA.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Feb. 11). Billion dollar question: What do law and social science have to say about

how juries decide on money damages? Presentation in the Law, Behavior, and Social Science

Colloquium, University of Illinois Law School, Champaign-Urbana, IL.

Hans, V. P. (2013, Jan. 4). Capital punishment in Delaware: Empirical findings, emerging patterns. Office

of the Public Defender Continuing Legal Education Program, Wilmington, DE.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Oct. 5). Session moderator, Presentation of evidence: Case video and panel discussion.

Symposium on The Optimal Jury Trial, American Bar Association Commission on the American

Jury Project, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Sept. 28). Global juries: A plan for research. Paper presented at the John Jay/National

Science Foundation Conference on the Future of Jury Research, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Sept. 13). Billion dollar question: How do juries determine damage awards?

Presentation in Faculty Development Series, Wake Forest Law School, Winston-Salem, NC.

Wallace, Natalie, & Hans, V. P. (2012, June 6). Is there a doctor in the “House”? The portrayal of medical

negligence in “House, M.D.” Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference on Law &

Society, Honolulu, HI.

Hans, V. P. (2012, June 5). The jury in Russia: Research and reform. Paper presented at the 2012

International Conference on Law & Society, Honolulu, HI.

- 24 -

Hans, V. P. (2012, May 4). Panelist, Social science and legal scholarship. Berkeley-NSF Workshop on the Interplay between Social Science and Law Schools: Visions, Challenges and Trajectories.

University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Apr. 27). Jury jokes. Paper presented at 2012 Clifford Symposium: A Celebration of

the Thought of Marc Galanter. DePaul University College of Law, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Apr. 13). Panelist, faculty panel on Interdisciplinary Research and Methodology,

presented at the Inter-University Graduate Conference on Changing Faces in Legal Thinking:

Revisiting Legal Methodologies. Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. (2012, Feb. 29). “Just the gist, ma'am:” A model of jury damage award

decision making. Paper presented at faculty workshop, Washington University School of Law, St.

Louis, MO.

Hans, V. P. (2012, Feb. 22). Deciding death in Delaware. Paper presented at faculty workshop, Francis

King Carey School of Law, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Dec. 12-13). Studying the impact of Guan Shen, Taiwan’s proposed lay observer

system. Seminar on Empirical Evaluation of the Proposed System, College of Law, National

Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Dec. 12). Lay citizens and legal decision making around the world: Insights for

Taiwan’s proposed system. Presentation at College of Law, National Taiwan University, Taipei,

Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Nov. 16). Deciding death: Juries, judges, and capital punishment in America. Talk at

the American Bar Foundation, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. (2011, Nov. 5). To dollars from sense: Qualitative to quantitative translation in

jury damage awards. Presentation at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Northwestern

University Law School, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Nov. 1).Common sense judgment: What we know, think we know, and don’t know

about the jury. Presentation to the Department of Psychology, Moscow State University,

Moscow, Russia.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Oct. 28). Psychology, law and the jury: Jurors’ characteristics and jury decision

making. Presentation to the Department of Psychology, Moscow State University, Moscow,

Russia.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Oct. 24). Juries and the rule of law. Methodological seminar presented to the Club for

Jurors, Moscow, Russia.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Oct. 19). Judge versus jury: What difference does it make? Presentation to Criminal

Procedure course, Moscow State University (with remote connection to Moscow State University

participants in Geneva, Switzerland). Moscow, Russia.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Sept. 15). The death penalty: Judge versus jury. Center for Law, Society and Culture,

Maurer School of Law, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

Hans, V. P. (2011, Sept. 7). Japan’s jury system: A progress report. Clarke Colloquium Series, Clarke

Program in East Asian Law and Culture, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

- 25 - Hans, V. P. (2011, Aug. 7). Juries and the impact of victim participation in criminal trials: Insights from

the American experience. International Society for Criminology, 16th World Congress, Kobe,

Japan.

Germain, C., & Hans, V. P. (2011, June 2). The French jury at a crossroads. Paper presented at the annual

meeting of the Law & Society Association, San Francisco, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2011, June 4). Participant in roundtable, Comparative research methodology: Experiences

and lessons. Presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, San Francisco,

CA.

Hans, V. P. (2011, June 4). Discussant, panel on The saiban-in system: New developments in the

Japanese experiment with citizen participation. Presented at the annual meeting of the Law &

Society Association, San Francisco, CA.

Hans, V. P. (2011, March 25). The French jury in comparative context. Paper presented at the conference

Popular Justice: Beyond Judges and Juries, cosponsored by Berger International Legal Studies

Program, Cornell Law School and Ecole Normale Supérieure’s Centre de Théorie et Analyse du droit, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.

Hans V. P., Eisenberg, T., Blume, J. H., Johnson, S. L., & Wells, M. T. (2011, Jan. 21). An empirical

study of the death penalty in Delaware: A progress report. Paper presented at the Cornell Law

School Faculty Retreat, Ovid, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2010, Oct. 22). Jury representativeness and jury reform in New York State. Paper presented

at the National Symposium on the American Jury System, ABA Commission on the American Jury Project. Washington, DC.

Hans, V. P., & Reyna, V. F. (2010, Oct. 4). To dollars from sense: Qualitative to quantitative translation

in jury damage awards. Paper presented at Judgment by the Numbers conference, Institute for

Social Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2010, Sept. 11). Panelist, From pilot study to publication: Empirical legal research. Third

National People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference. Seton Hall Law School, Newark, NJ.

Hans, V. P. (2010, May 28). The development of empirical legal studies. Paper presented at the annual

meeting of the Law & Society Association, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P., Blume, J., Eisenberg, T., & Johnson, S. L. (2010, May 6). Empirical study of the death

penalty in Delaware: A progress report. Presentation at the Delaware Superior Court Judicial

Conference, Dover, DE.

Hans, V. P. (2010, April 15). Japan’s new lay judge system: Deliberative democracy in action? Faculty Workshop, Loyola LA Law School, Los Angeles, CA.

Hans, V. P., & Eisenberg, T. (2010, April 9). The predictability of juries. Paper presented at the 2010 Clifford Symposium: The Limits of Predictability and the Value of Uncertainty, DePaul University

College of Law, Chicago, IL.

Hans, V. P. & Cornwell, E. (2010, March 25). Who participates in jury deliberations? Paper presented in

the Faculty Workshop, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe,

AZ.

- 26 - Hans, V. P. (2010, Feb. 24). Japan’s new lay judge system: Deliberative democracy in action? Paper

presented in the Theorists and Jurists Series, Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy, University

at Buffalo Law School, Buffalo, NY.

Hans, V. P., & Corey, Z. (2010, Feb. 5). Deliberative democracy and Japan’s lay judge system. Paper

presented at the inaugural East Asian Law & Society meeting, Hong Kong.

Hans, V. P. (2010, Jan. 22). Presentation of the work of Jeffrey Rachlinski, Context effects in judicial

decision making. Annual Faculty Retreat, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P., & Cornwell, E. Y. (2009, Dec. 3). Judicial efficiency and the jury. Paper presented at the

meeting, Efficiency and the Judiciary: Law and Economics Perspectives. International

Programme in Institutions, Economics and Law, Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri (Torino),

Italy.

Cornwell, E. Y., & Hans, V. P. (2009, Nov. 20) Contextualizing jury participation: Case-, jury-, and

juror-level predictors of participation in jury deliberations. Paper presented at the third annual

meeting of the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, USC Gould School of Law, Los Angeles,

CA.

Hans, V. P. (2009, Oct. 9). Moderator, panel on Ex-Offenders in the Workplace, Richard Netter

Conference: Race, Criminal Records and Employment: Legal Practice and Social Science

Research, Cornell University ILR School, Labor and Employment Program, New York, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2009, Sept. 20-21). Participant, Workshop on Evaluating Judges, Judging and Judicial

Institutions, Duke Law School, Durham, NC.

Hans, V. P. (2009, June 6). Juries and culture. Panelist, Cultural effects on the American jury and juries

around the world, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Trial Consultants,

Atlanta, GA.

Hans, V. P., Galanter, M., & Henry, M. (2009, May 29). Jury jokes. Paper presented at the annual

meeting of the Law & Society Association, Denver, CO.

Hans, V. P. (2009, May 29). Discussant, Panel on Legal Decisions of Professional and Lay Judges,

presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Denver, CO.

Ivkovich, S. K., & Hans, V. P. (2009, May 28). A worldwide survey of lay participation in legal decision-

making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Denver, CO.

Hans, V. P. (2009, March 7). Discussant, panel on Coding legal discussions: Mistakes made and lessons

learned. Panel presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San

Antonio, TX.

Eisenberg, T., & Hans, V. P. (2009, February 6). Empirical legal studies and law and society scholarship.

Presentation at the Law in Social Context Seminar, Department of Sociology, Cornell University,

Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P., & Eisenberg, T. (2009, January 16). Response to commentator Sherry Colb on Taking a

stand on taking the stand. Faculty Academic Retreat, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2009, January 8). Plaintiphobia and case outcomes: Theory or reality? Presentation at the

annual meeting of the American Association of Law Schools, San Diego, CA.

- 27 - Hans, V. P. (2008, November 18). Taking a stand on taking the stand: The effect of a prior criminal

record on the decision to testify and on trial outcomes. Temple University Beasley School of

Law, Philadelphia, PA.

Eisenberg, T., Hans, V. P., & Bybee, K. (2008, November 1). Critical intervention session: Empirical

legal studies. Presentation at the Northeast Law & Society conference, Amherst College,

Amherst, MA.

Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (2008, October 24). How juries decide cases: What practitioners can learn

from the research. Presentation at the 4th Thomas F. Lambert, Jr. Conference: Successful

Strategies for Jury Trials, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA.

Hans, V. P., & Eisenberg, T. (2008, October 7). Convicted by the past? The impact of criminal record in

felony jury trials. Faculty Workshop, University of Illinois College of Law, Urbana/Champaign,

IL.

Hans, V. P. (2008, September 25). American juries: The verdict.

Presentation at the Flaschner Judicial Institute, Boston, MA.

Presentation at the Social Law Library, Boston, MA.

Blume, J. H., Eisenberg, T., Johnson, S. L. & Hans, V. P. (2008, September 12). The death penalty in

Delaware: An empirical study. Third Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Cornell

Law School, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2008, September). Paper discussant, Third Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies,

Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2008, August). Empirical research on lay participation. China-USA workshop: Lay

Participation in the Judicial Process. Kenneth Wang School of Law, Soochow University,

Suzhou, China.

Hans, V. P. (2008, June 24). Lay participation reforms in East Asia. Roundtable discussion, Institutum

Jurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2008, June 21). What difference do juries make? Paper presented at First International

Conference on Empirical Studies of Judicial Systems, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hans, V. P. (2008, May 31). Chair/discussant, panel on The Introduction of Citizens as Legal Decision

Makers in Japan: Preparing for Saiban-in Seido. Annual meeting of the Law & Society

Association, Montreal, Canada.

Hans, V. P. (2008, May 29). Participant, Author Meets Reader: American Juries: The Verdict, by Neil

Vidmar and Valerie Hans. Annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Montreal, Canada.

Hans, V. P. (2008, May 14). Talk to Terry-Carey American Inn of Court, Baywood Country Club,

Rehoboth, DE.

Hans, V. P. (2008, Feb. 12). Social science and litigation. Presentation at the Institute for Social Science,

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Hans, V. P. (2008, Feb. 11). Remarks at Law School Faculty Book Celebration of American Juries: The

Verdict. Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY.

- 28 - Hans, V. P. (2008, Feb. 1). Employment discrimination and the jury. Forum on Social Science Research

and Title VII Class Action Litigation. Cornell ILR Conference Center, New York, NY.

GRANTS

National Science Foundation, 2016-2019. “Expanding Law and Social Science Research by International

Research Collaboration." (SES-1556070) $293,250 (with Lawrence M. Friedman, Manuel A.

Gomez, and Masayuki Murayama, through the Law and Society Association).

National Science Foundation, 2015-2019. “Quantitative Judgments in Law: Studies of Damage Award

Decision Making.” (SES-1536238) $389,996 (with Valerie F. Reyna).

Institute for the Social Sciences, Cornell University, and Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies,

Cornell University, 2018-2020. A New Jury System at Work. Project is jointly funded by ISS

($7000) and Einaudi ($1700).

Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law, funding for international conference, “Juries and

Mixed Tribunals across the Globe: New Developments, Common Challenges, and Future

Directions,” held June 12-13, 2014 at the Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law,

Oñati, Spain (co-organized with Nancy Marder, Mar Jimeno Bulnes, and Steven Thaman).

Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, Cornell University, 2013. “International Collaborative

Empirical Research on Juries and Other Lay Participation Systems.” $2,500.

National Science Foundation, 2011-2013. “Transforming Cross-National Theory and Research through

International Research Collaboratives.” (SES-1126004) $175,750 (with Barbara Yngvesson, David

M. Engel, Masayuki Murayama, Sally E. Merry; through the Law and Society Association).

Course Design Institute, Cornell University, January 16-17, 2012. Developed new course for Cornell

University students: Judging the Jury.

Research grant, Cornell University Institute for Social Science, 2009-2012. Theme Project: Judgment,

Decision Making, and Social Behavior.

Interactions of Social Science and Law, Faculty Innovation in Teaching Program, Cornell University,

2009-2010. Created course website: http://courses2.cit.cornell.edu/sociallaw/index.html (Social

Science and Law web page).

Summer Research Grants, Cornell Law School, 2006-2018.

“Citizen Participation in the Judicial System: Trial by Jury.” U.S. Speaker and Specialist Program of the

U.S. Department of State's Office of International Information Programs, Aug. 29-Sept. 4, 2004.

Speaker and Specialist Program grant for webcast to Bar Association of Morón, November 12,

2004.

Project Consultant for National Institute of Justice Practitioner Visiting Fellowship project, (PVF Award

No. 2002-90416-VA-IJ), to B. Michael Dann, “A Study of Disputed DNA Presentations in Jury

Trials,” 2002-2004. Final report: B. M. Dann, V. P. Hans, & D. Kaye, Testing the Effects of

Selected Jury Trial Innovations on Juror Comprehension of Contested mtDNA Evidence: Final

Technical Report, National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of

Justice, December 30, 2004.

- 29 - Project Consultant, National Center for State Courts grant, “Are Hung Juries a Problem?” (Project

director: G. Thomas Munsterman). Funded by the National Institute of Justice (98-IJ-CS-0048).

$169,588. Final report: P. L. Hannaford-Agor, V. P. Hans, N. L. Mott, & g. T. Munsterman, Are

Hung Juries a Problem? National Center for State Courts/National Institute of Justice, Office of

Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Jsutice. Available online at

http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_Juries_HungJuriesPub.pdf.

General University Research Grant, University of Delaware, 1999-2000. “Public Views of Legal

Contracts.” $6,000.

Project Consultant, National Center for State Courts grant, “Should Jurors Be Permitted to Discuss the

Evidence Prior to Deliberation?” (Project director: G. Thomas Munsterman) Funded by the State

Justice Institute, 1996-1999 (SJI-96-12A-B-181).

National Science Foundation, 1995-1996. "Crossing Boundaries: Summer Training Institute in Law and

Social Science." $40,000. (with Austin Sarat, Marianne Constable, David M. Engel, and Susan

Lawrence).

National Science Foundation, 1994-1995. "Summer Training Institute in Law and Social Science." (SBR-

9410902). $40,000. (with Austin Sarat, Marianne Constable, David M. Engel, and Susan

Lawrence).

National Science Foundation, 1993-1994. "Public Views of Business and Corporate Responsibility."

(GER-9350498). $95,464.

National Science Foundation, 1992-1994. "Judgments of Responsibility for Disaster Consequences."

(SBE-9213737) $76,484. (with Joanne Nigg)

U.S. Courts for the District of Columbia Circuit, 1992-1994. "Research Assistance for the Task Force for

the District of Columbia Circuit on Gender and Racial Bias." $14,500.

National Science Foundation, 1989-1993. "Public Views of Corporate Responsibility for Wrongdoing."

(SES-8822598) $140,000. Research Experience for Undergraduates supplement awarded January

1990.

Center for Teaching Effectiveness, University of Delaware, 1992-93. "Development of Introduction to

Legal Studies Course."

Center for Teaching Effectiveness, University of Delaware, 1989-90. "Development of a Legal Studies

Program" (with Leslie F. Goldstein).

Office of Computer-Based Instruction, University of Delaware, 1983-1984. "Social Science Research

Methods: An Interdisciplinary Project." (with Janet B. Johnson, Edward P. Hall, Teresa L.

Thompson, & Allan L. McCutcheon).

General University Research Grant, University of Delaware, 1983: "Attitudes toward the Insanity

Defense."

Youth Employment Project, Ministry of Labour, Province of British Columbia, 1980: "Influence of

Knowledge About Fitness to Stand Trial on Jury Disposition." (with Ron Roesch).

President's Research Grant, Simon Fraser University, 1979-1980: "Combatting Prejudice in the

Courtroom."

- 30 - Law Reform Commission of Canada, 1977-1978: "Research on the Unanimity Requirement."

SELECTED SERVICE ACTIVITIES

Cornell University Service

Cornell Law School Faculty Appointments Committee, 2008-2009; 2014-2015; 2016-2017; 2018-2020

(Chair). Entry Level Subcommittee, 2008-2009 (Chair), 2016-2017, 2018-2019 (Chair).

Cornell University, Committee on Social Science Idea Panels, Co-Chair (2017-2018).

Cornell Law School Alumni in Academia Committee, 2013-2018, Chair, 2015-2018.

Cornell Law School, Faculty Advisor, Society for Wine and Jurisprudence (law student club), 2017-2019.

Cornell Law School Graduate Studies Committee, 2015-2016.

Cornell Law School Building Committee, 2012-2016.

Cornell University Institute for the Social Sciences, Faculty Advisory Committee, 2015.

Cornell University Faculty Senate, Law School Representative, 2011-2014.

Cornell Law School Alumni in Teaching Committee, Co-Chair, 2008-2009; Chair 2009-2013.

Cornell Law School Library/IT Committee, 2011-2012.

Cornell Law School Career Planning and Placement Committee, 2011-2012.

Cornell Law School Self-Study Committee, in preparation for ABA accreditation review, 2010-2011.

CISER Faculty Advisory Committee, 2007-2010.

Law School representative, Faculty Innovation in Teaching Program, Cornell University, 2006-2010.

Cornell Law School Admissions Committee, 2006-2007; Spring 2008.

Faculty Advisory Committee on Tenure Appointments (FACTA), Cornell University, 2006-2007.

Cornell Law School Academic Programs and Planning Committee, 2005-2006.

University of Delaware Service

Legal Studies Program: Co-Chair, Legal Studies Committee, College of Arts & Science, 1989-1990

(developed University of Delaware’s Legal Studies Program and minor); Executive Committee,

Legal Studies Program, 1991-1995, 1997-2006; Director: 1995-1996, 1998-2000.

Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education, Fellow; one of the Institute Leaders, 1999-2004;

Organizing Committee, PBL2002: A Pathway to Better Learning, An International Conference on

Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education, held June 16-20, 2002, Baltimore, MD.

Phi Kappa Phi, Delaware Chapter, Vice-President, 2002-2003; President-Elect, 2003-2004; President,

2004-2005.

Promotion and Tenure Committee, College of Arts & Science, 1997-1999 (Chair: 1998-1999).

Faculty Representative, Hearing Board, Student Judicial System, 1981-1984 (Chair, 1983-1984);

Appellate Court, Student Judicial System, 1984-1985.

Commission on the Status of Women, 1987-1988; Women's Studies Program Advisory Committee,

1983-1988.

Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice committees: Departmental Policy Committee, 1981-1983,

1987-1988, 1994-1995; 2004-2005; Graduate Policy Committee, 1983-1990, 1994-1996, 1998-1999

(Chair: 1988-1990); Promotion and Tenure Committee, 1991, 2001, 2004; Search Committees,

1981, 1985, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 2000 (Chair, Criminal Justice Search Committees, 1994 (two

positions); 1995; 2000); Undergraduate Policy Committee, 1980-1982, 1990-1992.

Community Service

Appointments and Participation on Boards and Committees

Civil Justice Research Initiative, Board of Advisors, 2017-present.

Life of the Law, Scholars Advisory Board, 2015-present, http://www.lifeofthelaw.org/about-us/team/.

Civil Jury Project, NYU School of Law, Board of Academic Advisors, 2015-present.

- 31 - Delaware Center for Justice, Board of Directors, 2003-2005; DCJ Committee on Public Education, 2003-

2004; 85th Anniversary Committee (Co-chair), 2004-2005.

The News Journal (Wilmington, Delaware) Community Advisory Board, 2001-2003. Duties included

writing quarterly opinion pieces for the newspaper.

Delaware Task Force on the More Effective Use of Juries, 1996-1998. [Report of the Task Force released

in 1998.]

Co-Director of Research, Special Committee on Gender, Task Force for the District of Columbia Circuit

on Gender and Racial Bias, 1992-1995. [Two-volume report published in 1995. Major findings

reprinted in Georgetown Law Journal, 84, 1657-1894 (1996).]

Brandywine School District (New Castle County, Delaware)

Gifted Program Evaluation, Evaluation Committee, 2002-2003; Gifted Task Force, 2003; Gifted

Advisory Committee, 2004-2005.

Committee to Explore Gender Bias Study, Criminal Justice Council, State of Delaware, 1992.

State of Delaware, Juvenile Justice Advisory Group, 1985-1989.

Delaware Humanities Forum Speakers Bureau, 1984-1986.

Jury Advisory Board, Law Reform Commission of Canada, 1977-1978.

Expert Testimony/Amicus Briefs

Brief of Law Professors and Social Scientists as Amici Curaie in Support of Petitioner, Ramos v.

Louisiana, US Supreme Court (2019) [topic: Jury unanimity].

Brief of Amici Curiae College and University Professors Brian Bornstein et al., State v. Lawson in

Support of Respondent, Oregon Supreme Court (2012) [topic: eyewitness identification].

Amicus Brief of Professors Neil Vidmar et al., McCall v. US, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (2011)

[topic: Empirical research related to medical malpractice reform].

Brief of Scholars on Jury Deliberations as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendant Jathiyah Al-Bayyinah,

North Carolina v. Al-Bayyinah, N.C. Supreme Court (2010) [topic: Exclusion of African

Americans from capital juries].

Brief of Jeffrey Abramson et al. in Support of Petitioner, Bowen v. Oregon, U.S. Supreme Court (2009)

[topic: Jury unanimity].

Invited testimony, Public Hearing on Jury Diversity, Assembly Standing Committees on Judiciary and

Codes, New York State Assembly, New York, NY, April 30, 2009 [topic: Jury pool diversity in

New York State].

Brief of Steven G. Calabresi et al. in Support of Petitioner, Gonzalez v. Florida, U.S. Supreme Court

(2008) [topic: Jury size].

Brief Amici Curiae of Neil Vidmar et al. in Support of Plaintiff, Lebron v. Gottleib Memorial Hospital

(2008), Supreme Court of Illinois [Topic: damage caps in medical malpractice cases].

Brief Amici Curiae of Neil Vidmar et al. in Support of Respondent, Philip Morris USA v. Williams, U.S.

Supreme Court (2006) [topic: Jury punitive damage awards].

Brief Amici Curiae of Neil Vidmar et al. in Support of Petitioner, LaQuan Ledbetter v. Connecticut,

U.S. Supreme Court (2006) [topic: Role of witness certainty in assessing reliability of eyewitness

identification].

- 32 - Brief Amici Curiae of Mary Rose et al. in Support of Petitioner, Spirko v. Bradshaw, U.S. Supreme Court

(February 23, 2005). [Topic: Jury and the discrediting of eyewitness testimony]

Brief Amici Curiae of Certain Leading Social Scientists and Legal Scholars in Support of Respondents,

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, U.S. Supreme Court (October, 2002).

[Topic: Constitutionality of jury punitive damage awards]

Presentation to Judiciary Committee, House of Representatives, State of Delaware, on S.B. 221, a

proposed constitutional amendment permitting nonunanimous verdicts in civil juries. January 9,

2002.

Presentation to House of Representatives, State of Delaware, on H.B. 461, a proposed constitutional

amendment reducing civil jury size to six and permitting nonunanimous verdicts. April 13, 2000.

Expert testimony on the adequacy of capital voir dire, State v. Zebroski, Superior Court, New Castle

County, Wilmington, DE, December 3, 1999.

Brief Amici Curiae of Professors Neil Vidmar et al., Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael. U.S. Supreme

Court. Submitted October 19, 1998. [Topic: juries and expert testimony]

Expert testimony on voir dire and the automatic death penalty juror. State v. Wright. Superior Court, New

Castle County, Wilmington, DE. January 27, 1998.

Expert testimony on jury instructions in the penalty phase of capital trials. Free v. Peters, U.S. District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. January 13, 1992.

Expert testimony on jury decision making and the impact on the jury of prosecutorial actions and judicial

instructions. People v. Celestine and Burks. Superior Court, Sacramento County, Sacramento, CA.

October 30, 1987.

Expert testimony on death-qualified juries. State v. Blount. Superior Court, New Castle County,

Wilmington, DE. December 19, 1983.

Testimony at public hearing on proposed rule governing a one year experiment period for extended media

coverage of Delaware courts. Supreme Court, State of Delaware, Dover, Delaware, September 24,

1981.

Professional Service

American Association of Law Schools

Committee on Research, 2013-2015

American Bar Association

Advisory Commission to the Standing Committee on Public Education, 2007-2011.

American Bar Foundation

Wheeler External Review Committee, 2019-2022.

Law and Society Association

President, June 2015-June 2017; President-Elect, November 2014-June 2015; Immediate Past

President, June 2017-November 2018.

Organizer, Collaborative Research Network on Lay Participation in Legal Decision Making,

2000-present (with others).

Chair, Stan Wheeler Mentorship Award Committee, 2012-2013.

- 33 -

Board of Trustees, Class of 2011 (Term of service: 2009-2011); Class of 1991 (Term of service:

1989-1991).

Program Committee: 2012 (Hawai’i); 2010 (Advance Planning Committee for 2012 meeting in

Hawaii); 2009 (Denver, Colorado); 2007 (Berlin, Germany); 2002 (Vancouver, British Columbia)

(Co-Chair); 2001 (Budapest, Hungary); 1988 (Vail, Colorado).

Graduate Student Workshop Committee, 2007-2008.

Organizer, International Research Collaborative on Lay Participation in Legal Decisionmaking,

2006-2007; 2010-2012 (with others); 2015-2017 (with others).

Web page: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/lay_participation_in_law/index.cfm.

Chair, Kalven Prize Committee, 2003-2004; 2009-2010.

40th Anniversary Campaign, 2003-2004.

Committee on Development and External Relations, 1998-2000; co-chair, 1999-2000.

Chair, Planning Committee, 1998 Graduate Student Workshop, Aspen, CO.

Organizing Committee, Summer Training Institutes, 1993-1995.

Secretary, 1991-1993.

Long Range Planning Committee, 1991-1993.

Chair, Membership Committee, 1988-1990.

Society for Empirical Legal Studies

Chair, Organizing Committee, Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, 2008.

Board of Directors, 2009-2014, 2015-2018.

Co-President (with Jeffrey Rachlinski and Jed Stiglitz), 2016-2017.

American Psychological Association

Subcommittee on American Psychological Association-American Bar Association Relations, 1999-

2001.

Nominations Committee, Psychology and Law Division, 1999-2000.

Steering Committee, National Invitational Conference on Education and Training in Law

and Psychology, 1994-1995.

Chair, Financial Policy Committee, Psychology and Law Division, 1989-1991.

Courtwatch Committee, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 1984-1990. (Duties

included writing columns for the Judicial Notebook, APA Monitor).

Executive Committee, Psychology and Law Division, 1988-1990.

Grant-in-Aid Committee, Psychology and Law Division, 1987-1988.

Membership Chair, Psychology and Law Division, 1985-1987.

Program Chair for 1985 meeting, Psychology and Law Division.

Program Committee for 1984 & 1987 meetings, Psychology and Law Division.

Teaching Committee, Psychology and Law Division, 1982-1987.

Dissertation Awards Committee, Psychology and Law Division, 1982-1985.

National Center for State Courts

Research Affiliate, 1997-present.

Advisory Committee, Jury Summit 2001. Held on January 31-February 3, 2001, New York, NY.

Hosted by the National Center for State Courts and the New York State Unified Court System.

National Institute of Justice.

Grant review panel, 2009, 2011.

National Science Foundation

Advisory Panel, Law and Social Sciences, 1988-1991 (Grant review panel).

Member of the Fellowship Advisory Board of the Law and Social Science Dissertation Fellowship

and Mentoring Program, funded through the National Science Foundation and the American Bar

Foundation, 2008-2012; 2015-2017).

- 34 - New York State

New York Jury Demographics Working Group, Office of Court Research, State of New York,

2009-2011.

Consortium for Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs

President, 2003-2005.

Co-organizer (with Benjamin Fleury-Steiner) of annual meeting, Omni William Penn Hotel,

Pittsburgh, PA, June 4, 2003.

Academic Program Review Committees:

Department of Criminology, Law, and Society, University of California at Irvine, 2011.

Department of Criminal Justice, Indiana University, Bloomington, ID, 2009.

Department of Legal Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 2004.

Law and Society Program, University of California at Santa Barbara (Review Committee Chair),

1999.

Law and Society Program, Ramapo College, 1998.

Editorial Service

Coeditor (with Michael Heise, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Stewart J. Schwab, Jed Stiglitz, and Martin T.

Wells), Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011-present.

Coeditor (with Jeffrey J. Rachlinski), Social Science Research Network [SSRN], Law and

Psychology Journal (Online journal).

Associate Editor, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, January 1, 2016 – December 31,

2020.

Editorial Committee, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2013-2015.

Associate Editor, Law and Human Behavior, 1988-1996.

Series Co-editor, Law and Public Policy: Psychology and the Social Sciences Book Series,

APA Books, 2002.

Editorial boards:

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2003-2011.

Justice System Journal, 1996-2002.

Law and Human Behavior, 1986-1987; 1997-2011.

Law and Policy, 2005-2009.

Law and Social Inquiry, 1992-2003.

Law & Society Review, 1999-2011.

Psychology, Crime, and Law, 1992-present.

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2000-2014.

Reviewer: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Brooks/Cole, Dorsey Press, Gender and Society,

Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Houghton Mifflin Company, John Wiley and Sons, Journal of Applied

Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, Journal of Research in Personality, Justice System Journal, Law and Policy, Law and

Society Review, National Institute of Justice, National Science Foundation, Problem-Based

Learning Clearinghouse, Psychological Bulletin, Social Forces, Social Justice Review, Social

Problems, Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice.

- 35 - MEMBERSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES

American Association of Law Schools

American Bar Association (Associate member)

American Psychological Association, Division 41 (American Psychology-Law Society)

Law & Society Association

Society for Empirical Legal Studies (Fellow: 2015-present).