DECISION TREE INDUCTION

Attribute Selection Measures Heuristic for selecting splitting criterion

Also termed as Splitting rules Ranks the attributes

If selected attribute is continuous valued or discrete with binary split, then split point or split subset must also be chosen

Common measures Information Gain, Gain ration, Gini Index

Notations D Data Partition Class label attribute has m distinct values Ci

1=1..m Ci,D Set of tuples of class i in D

Information Gain Attribute A with v distinct values {a1, a2, av} If A is discrete valued partition D into v subsets

{D1,D2,DV} Each partition is expected to be pure Additional information required to classify the

samples is: InfoA(D) = j=1 v |Dj| / |D| x Info(Dj) |Dj| / |D| - Weight of partition InfoA(D) Expected information required to

classify a tuple from D based on partitioning by A Smaller the expected information greater the

purity of partitions The Information Gain is given by:

Gain(A) = Info(D) InfoA(D)

Expected reduction in Information requirement by choosing A

Example Expected information needed to classify the sample Expected Information requirement for age

Information-Gain for Continuous-Value Attributes Must determine the best split point for A

Sort the value A in increasing order Typically, the midpoint between each pair of

adjacent values is considered as a possible split point (ai+ai+1)/2 is the midpoint between the values

of ai and ai+1 The point with the minimum expected information

requirement for A is selected as the split-point for A

Calculate InfoA(D) for each possible split point and choose minimum one

Split: D1 is the set of tuples in D satisfying A split-

point, and D2 is the set of tuples in D satisfying A > split-point

Gain Ratio for Attribute Selection Information gain measure is biased towards attributes

with a large number of values Results in more number of partitions - pure

C4.5 (a successor of ID3) uses gain ratio to overcome the problem (normalization to information gain)

Split information value is used:

Potential information generated by splitting the training data set D into v partitions Considers the number of tuples wrt total tuples

The attribute with the maximum gain ratio is selected as the splitting attribute

Gain Ratio - Example Gain ratio for Income attribute Gain(Income) = 0.029 GainRatio(Income) = 0.029/0.926 = 0.031

Gini Index Measures the impurity of a data partition

pj is probability of a tuple belonging to class Cj Considers a binary split for each value

To determine best binary split on A, all possible subsets that can be formed are considered

2v 2 possible ways to form two partitions For binary splits Reduction in impurity Attribute that maximizes reduction in impurity

or one with minimum Gini index is chosen

Gini index Ex. D has 9 tuples in buys_computer = yes and 5

in no

Suppose the attribute income partitions D into 10 in D1: {low, medium} and 4 in D2

but gini{medium,high} is 0.30 and thus the best since it is the lowest

Attribute Selection Measures The three measures, in general, return good results

but Information gain:

biased towards multivalued attributes Gain ratio:

tends to prefer unbalanced splits in which one partition is much smaller than the others

Gini index: biased to multivalued attributes has difficulty when # of classes is large tends to favor tests that result in equal-sized

partitions and purity in both partitions

Other Attribute Selection Measures CHAID: a popular decision tree algorithm, measure

based on 2 test for independence C-SEP: performs better than info. gain and gini index

in certain cases G-statistics: has a close approximation to 2

distribution MDL (Minimal Description Length) principle (i.e.,

the simplest solution is preferred): The best tree as the one that requires the fewest #

of bits to both (1) encode the tree, and (2) encode the exceptions to the tree

Multivariate splits (partition based on multiple variable combinations) CART: finds multivariate splits based on a linear

comb. of attrs. Best attribute selection measure

Most give good results, none is significantly superior than others

Overfitting and Tree Pruning Overfitting: An induced tree may overfit the training

data Too many branches, some may reflect anomalies

due to noise or outliers Poor accuracy for unseen samples

Two approaches to avoid overfitting Prepruning: Halt tree construction earlydo not

split a node if this would result in the goodness measure falling below a threshold Difficult to choose an appropriate threshold

Postpruning: Remove branches from a fully grown treeget a sequence of progressively pruned trees Use a set of data different from the training

data to decide which is the best pruned tree

Tree Pruning Cost Complexity pruning

Post pruning approach used in CART Cost complexity function of number of leaves

and error rate of the tree For each internal node cost complexity is

calculated wrt original and pruned versions If pruning results in a smaller cost complexity

subtree is pruned Uses a separate prune set

Pessimistic Pruning Uses training set and adjusts error rates by adding

a penalty Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle Issues: Repetition and Replication

Enhancements to Basic Decision Tree Induction Allow for continuous-valued attributes

Dynamically define new discrete-valued attributes that partition the continuous attribute value into a discrete set of intervals

Handle missing attribute values Assign the most common value of the attribute Assign probability to each of the possible values

Attribute construction Create new attributes based on existing ones that

are sparsely represented This reduces fragmentation, repetition, and

replication

Scalability and Decision Tree Induction Scalability: Classifying data sets with millions of

examples and hundreds of attributes with reasonable speed

Large scale databases do not fit into memory Repeated Swapping of data Inefficient Scalable Variants

SLIQ, SPRINT

Scalable Decision Tree Induction Methods SLIQ

Supervised Learning in Quest Presort the data Builds an index for each attribute and only class

list and the current attribute list reside in memory Each attribute has an associated attribute list

indexed by a Record Identifier (RID) linked to class list

Class list points to node Limited by the size of the class list

SLIQ Example

Scalable Decision Tree Induction Methods SPRINT

Serial PaRallelizable INduction Constructs an attribute list data structure Class, Attribute and RID for each attribute Can be parallelized

Scalability Framework for RainForest Separates the scalability aspects from the criteria that

determine the quality of the tree Builds an AVC-list: AVC (Attribute, Value,

Class_label) AVC-set (of an attribute X )

Projection of training dataset onto the attribute X and class label where counts of individual class label are aggregated

Rainforest: Training Set and AVC Sets

BOAT (Bootstrapped Optimistic Algorithm for Tree Construction) Use a statistical technique called bootstrapping to

create several smaller samples (subsets), each fits in memory

Each subset is used to create a tree, resulting in several trees

These trees are examined and used to construct a new tree T It turns out that T is very close to the tree that

would be generated using the whole data set together

Adv: requires only two scans of DB, an incremental algorithm

Very much faster

DECISION TREE INDUCTIONAttribute Selection Measures Heuristic for selecting splitting criterion Also termed as Splitting rules Ranks the attributes

If selected attribute is continuous valued or discrete with binary split, then split point or split subset must also be chosen Common measures Information Gain, Gain ration, Gini Index Notations D Data Partition Class label attribute has m distinct values Ci 1=1..m Ci,D Set of tuples of class i in D

Information Gain Attribute A with v distinct values {a1, a2, av} If A is discrete valued partition D into v subsets {D1,D2,DV} Each partition is expected to be pure Additional information required to classify the samples is:InfoA(D) = (j=1 v |Dj| / |D| x Info(Dj) |Dj| / |D| - Weight of partition InfoA(D) Expected information required to classify a tuple from D based on partitioning by A Smaller the expected information greater the purity of partitions

The Information Gain is given by:Gain(A) = Info(D) InfoA(D) Expected reduction in Information requirement by choosing A

Example Expected information needed to classify the sample Expected Information requirement for age

Information-Gain for Continuous-Value Attributes Must determine the best split point for A Sort the value A in increasing order Typically, the midpoint between each pair of adjacent values is considered as a possible split point (ai+ai+1)/2 is the midpoint between the values of ai and ai+1

The point with the minimum expected information requirement for A is selected as the split-point for A Calculate InfoA(D) for each possible split point and choose minimum one

Split: D1 is the set of tuples in D satisfying A split-point, and D2 is the set of tuples in D satisfying A > split-point

Gain Ratio for Attribute Selection Information gain measure is biased towards attributes with a large number of values Results in more number of partitions - pure

C4.5 (a successor of ID3) uses gain ratio to overcome the problem (normalization to information gain) Split information value is used: Potential information generated by splitting the training data set D into v partitions Considers the number of tuples wrt total tuples

The attribute with the maximum gain ratio is selected as the splitting attribute

Gain Ratio - Example Gain ratio for Income attribute Gain(Income) = 0.029 GainRatio(Income) = 0.029/0.926 = 0.031

Gini Index Measures the impurity of a data partition pj is probability of a tuple belonging to class Cj

Considers a binary split for each value To determine best binary split on A, all possible subsets that can be formed are considered 2v 2 possible ways to form two partitions For binary splits Reduction in impurity Attribute that maximizes reduction in impurity or one with minimum Gini index is chosen

Gini index Ex. D has 9 tuples in buys_computer = yes and 5 in no Suppose the attribute income partitions D into 10 in D1: {low, medium} and 4 in D2but gini{medium,high} is 0.30 and thus the best since it is the lowest

Attribute Selection Measures The three measures, in general, return good results but Information gain: biased towards multivalued attributes

Gain ratio: tends to prefer unbalanced splits in which one partition is much smaller than the others

Gini index: biased to multivalued attributes has difficulty when # of classes is large tends to favor tests that result in equal-sized partitions and purity in both partitions

Other Attribute Selection Measures CHAID: a popular decision tree algorithm, measure based on 2 test for independence C-SEP: performs better than info. gain and gini index in certain cases G-statistics: has a close approximation to 2 distribution MDL (Minimal Description Length) principle (i.e., the simplest solution is preferred): The best tree as the one that requires the fewest # of bits to both (1) encode the tree, and (2) encode the exceptions to the tree

Multivariate splits (partition based on multiple variable combinations) CART: finds multivariate splits based on a linear comb. of attrs.

Best attribute selection measure Most give good results, none is significantly superior than others

Overfitting and Tree Pruning Overfitting: An induced tree may overfit the training data Too many branches, some may reflect anomalies due to noise or outliers Poor accuracy for unseen samples

Two approaches to avoid overfitting Prepruning: Halt tree construction earlydo not split a node if this would result in the goodness measure falling below a threshold Difficult to choose an appropriate threshold

Postpruning: Remove branches from a fully grown treeget a sequence of progressively pruned trees Use a set of data different from the training data to decide which is the best pruned tree

Tree Pruning Cost Complexity pruning Post pruning approach used in CART Cost complexity function of number of leaves and error rate of the tree For each internal node cost complexity is calculated wrt original and pruned versions If pruning results in a smaller cost complexity subtree is pruned Uses a separate prune set

Pessimistic Pruning Uses training set and adjusts error rates by adding a penalty

Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle Issues: Repetition and Replication

Enhancements to Basic Decision Tree Induction Allow for continuous-valued attributes Dynamically define new discrete-valued attributes that partition the continuous attribute value into a discrete set of intervals

Handle missing attribute values Assign the most common value of the attribute Assign probability to each of the possible values

Attribute construction Create new attributes based on existing ones that are sparsely represented This reduces fragmentation, repetition, and replication

Scalability and Decision Tree Induction Scalability: Classifying data sets with millions of examples and hundreds of attributes with reasonable speed Large scale databases do not fit into memory Repeated Swapping of data Inefficient Scalable Variants SLIQ, SPRINT

Scalable Decision Tree Induction Methods SLIQ Supervised Learning in Quest Presort the data Builds an index for each attribute and only class list and the current attribute list reside in memory Each attribute has an associated attribute list indexed by a Record Identifier (RID) linked to class list Class list points to node Limited by the size of the class list

SLIQ ExampleScalable Decision Tree Induction Methods SPRINT Serial PaRallelizable INduction Constructs an attribute list data structure Class, Attribute and RID for each attribute Can be parallelized

Scalability Framework for RainForest Separates the scalability aspects from the criteria that determine the quality of the tree Builds an AVC-list: AVC (Attribute, Value, Class_label) AVC-set (of an attribute X ) Projection of training dataset onto the attribute X and class label where counts of individual class label are aggregated

Rainforest: Training Set and AVC SetsBOAT (Bootstrapped Optimistic Algorithm for Tree Construction) Use a statistical technique called bootstrapping to create several smaller samples (subsets), each fits in memory Each subset is used to create a tree, resulting in several trees These trees are examined and used to construct a new tree T It turns out that T is very close to the tree that would be generated using the whole data set together

Adv: requires only two scans of DB, an incremental algorithm Very much faster